Misplaced Pages

User talk:Who: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:56, 6 June 2005 editJnc (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators17,600 edits Felix the Cat← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:42, 12 November 2024 edit undoDidlidoo (talk | contribs)90 edits A kitten for you!: new WikiLove messageTag: WikiLove 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{not around|date=May 18, 2020}}
<div id="talk" style="border: 1px solid #000000; text-align: center; padding:5px; clear: both; background-color: #f4f4f4"> <div id="talk" style="border: 1px solid #000000; text-align: center; padding:5px; clear: both; background-color: #f4f4f4">



'''<font color="Blue">{{CURRENTDAYNAME}} <font color="Blue"> {{CURRENTMONTHNAMEGEN}} {{CURRENTDAY}}<sup>th</sup> <font color="Blue"> {{CURRENTTIME}}''' </font>
{{Userpage}} {{Userpage}}
Line 12: Line 11:
<div style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA"> <div style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA">
<div style="border-top: 1px solid white; border-left: 1px solid white"> <div style="border-top: 1px solid white; border-left: 1px solid white">
] ]]
</div> </div>
</div> </div>
Line 19: Line 18:
<div style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA"> <div style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA">
<div style="border-top: 1px solid white; border-left: 1px solid white"> <div style="border-top: 1px solid white; border-left: 1px solid white">
] ]
</div> </div>
</div> </div>
Line 33: Line 32:
<div style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA"> <div style="border: 1px solid #AAAAAA">
<div style="border-top: 1px solid white; border-left: 1px solid white"> <div style="border-top: 1px solid white; border-left: 1px solid white">
] ]
</div> </div>
</div> </div>
Line 47: Line 46:
</div> </div>


{{TOCright}}
----


== Changing merge templates == == ArbCom 2019 special circular ==

<div class="notice" style="background:#fff1d2; border:1px solid #886644; padding:0.5em; margin:0.5em auto; min-height:40px; line-height:130.7%; font-weight: 130.7%;">
{|
|valign="top" style="padding: 0.5em 1em 0 0.25em;"| ]
|<span style="font-size: 125%;">'''Administrators ] secure their accounts'''</span>
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
* Use strong, unique passwords for your Misplaced Pages account and associated email
* ] if your Misplaced Pages account password or email password is reused on another website, , or weak
* ] for improved security
|}
<span style="color:#5871C6;cursor:pointer" class="mw-customtoggle-ArbCom_2019_special_circular">{{clickable button 2|1=View additional information|link=no}}</span>
</div><div class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed" id="mw-customcollapsible-ArbCom_2019_special_circular" style="display:none">
<div style="border-style: dotted; border-color: #886644; border-width: 0 3px 3px 3px; padding: 0 0.5em 0.5em 0.5em;">

{| style="border-left: 3px solid black; padding-left: 1em;"
|{{null}}
; Why have I received this message?
: All administrators are receiving it.

; What prompted you to send this message?
: Recently, several Misplaced Pages admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were ]. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh ] after losing control of their account.

; What do I need to do?
: Only to follow the instructions in this message.
:# Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites).
:# Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable).
:# Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers.

; How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)?
: You can find out more about 2FA at ].
|}</div>
</div>


<small>This message was sent to all administrators following a ]. Thank you for your attention. For the ], ] 02:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small>
Please see ] before changing more merge templates. - ] 12:43, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 -->


== Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular) ==
== Gang ==


ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Wouldn't it make more sense to leave the article on the overwhelmingly common meaning of "gang" at ] and put the disambiguation at ]? Anyway, if you really insist on doing it this way, are you planning to do something about the roughly 200 articles that you've now left pointing at a disambiguation page? -- ] | ] 06:04, May 3, 2005 (UTC)


Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are ] to "have strong passwords and ]." We have ] our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, ] remains an ''optional'' means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
== ] ==


We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
Hi,


For the Arbitration Committee, -] 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)</small>
Just wanted to thank you for your involvement in this page. I have reported his actions to ]. However, I do not believe this person can be stopped by mere arbitrary actions. In my view, the only way to stop him is to have several editors standing against him and neutralizing all his POV edits and vandalism/trolling. Only then, I believe, this person will realize the whole senselessness of his actions and will retreat. Therefore, I am grateful to you and to ] for not leaving me alone to combat Rovoam's POV and vandalism. Please, keep it up. --] 05:04, May 5, 2005 (UTC)
<!-- Template:ArbCom 2019 special circular correction -->
<!-- Message sent by User:Cameron11598@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Bradv/Adminlist-mms&oldid=891852932 -->
:Reviewed, in compliance. ]]] 04:38, 6 May 2019 (UTC)


== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
Thanks for picking up on the immature prank, apparently played by one of the other ], by creating an extremely insulting entry for ]. I've put some work into the entry, it may lack a bit of neutrality but it's much better than what you found.


== Brackets in IPA transliterations ==


]
Hi, please don't remove square brackets from IPA transliterations. They are necessary! Thanks! --]/] 19:52, 12 May 2005 (UTC)
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.


Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ].
== Abbott & Costello ==


Who is the Wikipedian that this user talk page belongs to?? ] 14:45, 21 May 2005 (UTC) Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->—&thinsp;] 00:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
:Received. ]]] 01:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)
== Nomination of ] for deletion ==
<div class="afd-notice">
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ].


The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
==<nowiki>{{Image-stub}}</nowiki>==
''I feel I have explained everything on my test page for this stub.''
:Hi Who (hi who, it's off to work...)... erm... This isn't really a stub-type operation. Stub is simply a way of saying that an article is incomplete, not ''why'' it is incomplete. In any case, there are already templates used for just that purpose - you've created an alternative form of ]. I must admit it looks better that Reqimage, but I'd suggest proposing a change to that template (to make it more like your one) on the Reqimage talk page rather than to WP:WSS. Otherwise, as the duplicate of an existing template, it's likely to eventually turn up on ]. Please don't call it "stub", though, whatever you do - an article without an image is still a valid article, not a stub! ]...<font color=green><small>''] 01:46, 22 May 2005 (UTC)


Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
== Article on twins ==
<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> <sub style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]&#124;]</sub> 08:36, 22 December 2020 (UTC)
== Nomination for merging of ] ==
]] has been ] with ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> ] (]) 10:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)


== Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
Hi, Who. I'm sorry, but I had to revert your edits in the articles partaining to the ]. I stated my reasons in the edit summary, but I figured I'd drop you a message to explain it better. I see you've been with us for little more than a month. That being the case, I thought you might not yet be completely familiarized with some of our procedings. In cases like this one, we prefer to put the topic up for discussion on the article's talk page before implementing the change. There, we try to reach a consensus, which basicaly means that we get a reasonable number of editors to agree on a line of action, which is the one that shall be taken in the article itself (how many people may have to agree to form consensus is subjective, it depends on how many people are interested and contribute for any particular article, or just how many opinions happen to have been given to the issue at hand). In the case of the issue of whether to split the article on the Olsen sisters in two, you will notice that this has been discussed before (as a matter of fact, it was brought up by someone who thought that the article should be broken in two), but the train of thought that prevailed was in favor of keeping the ''status quo'' for that article. That is why I reverted your edits. I must say that, personally, I too think that it should be kept in only one article &mdash; read the comments in the article's talk page for more details (but you will notice that I did not participate in that discussion myself). In any event, the consensus was to keep the joint article. I apologize if I might have erased some new data that you may have inserted in the separated articles. If that happened, I would ask you to integrate them in the MK&A article. Cheers, ] 02:44, 22 May 2005 (UTC)
:I'm glad to be of assistance. Your points about the twins are theoretically valid, but let me sum up what was discussed on that regard (also in other similar instances): It may well be that the two of them go their separate ways and end up doing noteworthy deeds each on their own, but that has not happened thus far. Certainly there are facts about each of them that are different, but Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, and most of these facts are not suited for it. So, when it comes down to what is encyclopedic enough about the Olsen twins, we'd end up with two articles that would essentially repeat the same contents. In these cases, one of Misplaced Pages's main features comes in handy: it can be updated constantly. Biographies of living people are always about "current events", so you could say that separating the articles is something that is "on hold" right now, to be done if and when the situation warrants it. Right now, the twins' ''encyclopedic'' information (and that adjective is key here) is virtually the same ("more than 95%", as one user put it), so we have no basis for two articles on them. Regards, ] 03:04, 22 May 2005 (UTC)


== stubs ==


]
''Hi, again. I totally forgot about the Australia and Sweden stubs, or I would have posted them on the discussion page as well. Unfortunately I created the France actor stub before I knew about the discussion page. You can be assured that it wont happen again. Thanks for your understanding.''
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next month.
:That's OK - just make sure it doesn't (sternly wags finger) :) ]...<font color=green><small>''] 01:45, 23 May 2005 (UTC)


Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ].
== re: vandalism on Caucasian Albania ==


Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->—&thinsp;] 00:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
See ]. --] | ] 20:28, May 23, 2005 (UTC)


== Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
== Image speedy deletions ==


I'm sorry, but the images you are tagging as candidates for speedy deletion aren't meeting any of the ] for images. -- ]|] 04:47, 27 May 2005 (UTC)


]
:"Redundant" has a very specific meaning in this case, it means the images are identical (except for scale), not just of the same subject. As image deletion cannot be undone, it's best to be careful with deleting them. Cleaning up unused images is a good thing, but you'll need to list them on ] to help avoid irreversible mistakes. -- ]|] 05:01, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed&#32;if you do not return to activity within the next several days.


Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at ]. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at ].
== Ed, Edd n Eddy ==


Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->—&thinsp;] 00:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Go ahead and merge them. I tried to make a start on them but there are 26 episodes to bind together, and that is actually a lot more than it seems like. ] 06:04, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
*Nice job with the merger! ] 07:36, 27 May 2005 (UTC)
*As the one who closed that VfD, I'd like to add my thanks for taking on the dirty work. :-) ] ] 11:51, 31 May 2005 (UTC)


== Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity ==
==Albertofan==
]
Not a problem. I checked the edit history of the Cynthia Vargas article and that led me to his edit history, and all of the articles he was writing. He was also seeding his fantasies into other articles, which I think I've cleaned up. Shadows2005 has been blocked for repeated deletion of the VfD header and of Talk page discussions. ]] 05:34, May 29, 2005 (UTC)
Established ] provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.


Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at ].
==Felix the Cat==


Thank you for your past contributions to the project. <!-- Template:Inactive admin -->— ] <sup>]</sup> 00:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
Are you sure that IMDB didn't get it wrong? I note that both the fan page, as well as the only IMDB has listed, both call it "Twisted Tales". Not only that, if you look at the cover art at both IMDB and the review page, the cover art gives the title as "Twisted Tales"! (I did check, and all the episodes listed on the thing listed on the review page are from the 95-96 season.) Now, perhaps the "Twisted Tales" variant was selected for the video re-release, and it's the cover art for that which we are seeing, but I would certainly want to make sure. (I'm not a Felix fan, I just did the article when it was listed on RfD.) ] ] 14:20, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
== "NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®" listed at ] ==
]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] ] 20:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
== "REALTOR®" listed at ] ==
]
An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect ] and has thus listed it ]. This discussion will occur at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] ] 04:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
==] has been nominated for renaming==


<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>] has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 09:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
: I don't think we have to be in any hurry to act; there's a redirect at the alternative title, so anyone looking up (or linking to) "Twisted Tales" is going to find the article. I'd rather take our time and get the definitive data. Have you tried e.g. contacting Film Roman and seeing what they say? Given all the stuff you've found, I can easily believe that ''both'' have been officially used; e.g. maybe it was "Adventures" back when it was on first-run TV, and "Tales" for the video re-release? (I'll copy the relevant posts to the article Talk: page, maybe someone else can help.) ] ] 23:56, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)


== A kitten for you! ==
==Your User page==
That's one of the advantages of being an admin -- you can protect your User page so that only you (and other admins) can edit it. ]] 23:54, Jun 3, 2005 (UTC)


]
== ] VfD ==
A kitten for you, fellow coder!


] (]) 21:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)
I didn't write it, and I have no notable works. I can barely get more reviews than I have chapters. ]] 02:07, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)
<br style="clear: both;"/>

Latest revision as of 21:42, 12 November 2024

This user may have left Misplaced Pages. Who has not edited Misplaced Pages since May 18, 2020. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.


This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Who.


Sand Box

Discussion log

Leave me a Message

VP discussion log

Wiki Syntax Errors

ArbCom 2019 special circular

Icon of a white exclamation mark within a black triangle
Administrators must secure their accounts

The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.

View additional information

Why have I received this message?
All administrators are receiving it.
What prompted you to send this message?
Recently, several Misplaced Pages admin accounts were compromised. The admin accounts were desysopped on an emergency basis. In the past, the Committee often resysopped admin accounts as a matter of course once the admin was back in control of their account. The committee has updated its guidelines. Admins may now be required to undergo a fresh Request for Adminship (RfA) after losing control of their account.
What do I need to do?
Only to follow the instructions in this message.
  1. Check that your password is unique (not reused across sites).
  2. Check that your password is strong (not simple or guessable).
  3. Enable Two-factor authentication (2FA), if you can, to create a second hurdle for attackers.
How can I find out more about two-factor authentication (2FA)?
You can find out more about 2FA at m:2FA.

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:29, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)

Reviewed, in compliance. «»Who?¿? 04:38, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:06, 1 May 2020 (UTC)

Received. «»Who?¿? 01:20, 19 May 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Seraphiel for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Seraphiel is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Seraphiel until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 08:36, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination for merging of Template:R from template shortcut

Template:R from template shortcut has been nominated for merging with Template:R from shortcut. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Aasim (talk) 10:12, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

Pending suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next month.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Imminent suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to activity within the next several days.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to rejoin the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for reengaging with the project are available at Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to rejoin the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)

Suspension of administrative permissions due to inactivity

Information icon Established policy provides for removal of the administrative permissions of users who have not made any edits or logged actions in the preceding twelve months. Because you have been inactive, your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux 00:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

"NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS®" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 2#NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 20:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

"REALTOR®" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect REALTOR® and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 April 15#REALTOR® until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. BD2412 T 04:59, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Lists of Law & Order episodes by season has been nominated for renaming

Category:Lists of Law & Order episodes by season has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Solidest (talk) 09:10, 18 September 2024 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

A kitten for you, fellow coder!

Didlidoo (talk) 21:42, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

Categories: