Misplaced Pages

Church tax: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:10, 27 June 2023 editPol098 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers118,687 edits intro: In some countries people who are not members of a religious community are exempt from the tax; in others it is always levied, with the payer often entitled to choose who receives it, typically the state or an activity of social interest.← Previous edit Latest revision as of 15:28, 14 November 2024 edit undoOXYLYPSE (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,688 edits Remove wall of text defining what a church is in the intro. Text references IRS requirements so a trimmed down version of it might be appropriate for the USA section below.Tags: Manual revert 2017 wikitext editor 
(35 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
{{Globalize|article|Europe|date=June 2017}} {{Globalize|article|Europe|date=June 2017}}
{{taxation}} {{taxation}}
A '''church tax''' is a ] collected by the state from members of some ] ] to provide financial support of churches, such as the salaries of its clergy and to pay the operating cost of the church. In some countries people who are not members of a religious community are exempt from the tax; in others it is always levied, with the payer often entitled to choose who receives it, typically the state or an activity of social interest. A '''church tax''' is a ] collected by the state from members of some ] ] to provide financial support of churches, such as the salaries of its clergy and to pay the operating cost of the church. Not all countries have such a tax. In some countries that do, people who are not members of a religious community are exempt from the tax; in others it is always levied, with the payer often entitled to choose who receives it, typically the state or an activity of social interest.


The constitution of a number of countries could be and have been interpreted as both supporting and prohibiting the levying of taxes unto churches; prohibiting church tax could separate church and state fiscally, but it could also be favorable treatment by the government.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://churchesandtaxes.procon.org/ |title=Should Churches (Including Mosques, Synagogues, etc.) Remain Tax-Exempt? |website=Britannica ProCon |publisher=] |access-date=August 5, 2020}}</ref> The constitution of a number of countries could be and have been interpreted as both supporting and prohibiting the levying of taxes unto churches; prohibiting church tax could separate church and state fiscally, but it could also be favorable treatment by the government.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://churchesandtaxes.procon.org/ |title=Should Churches (Including Mosques, Synagogues, etc.) Remain Tax-Exempt? |website=Britannica ProCon |publisher=] |access-date=August 5, 2020}}</ref>
The term "church tax" could mean a tax levied on a religious organisation by a state, or relate to tax exemptions and so on for churches, but this article is about a tax levied on individuals.


== Austria == ==Tithing==
Every recognized religious group in Austria can collect church tax at a rate of 1.1%, though currently only the Catholic and Protestant Church make use of that opportunity. Church tax is compulsory for Catholics in Austria.


{{Main|Tithe}}
This tax was introduced into Austria by the German government in 1939 after the 1938 '']'' (annexation of Austria into Germany). After Austria received national independence again after ] the tax was retained in order to keep the churches independent of political powers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thetablet.co.uk/article/12697 |title=Austria's perilous journey |publisher=Thetablet.co.uk |access-date=2013-09-03 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090502075031/http://www.thetablet.co.uk/article/12697 |archive-date=2013-12-24 |url-status=live }}</ref>


In the past it was usual for people to be expected to pay a part of their production (e.g., agricultural produce) or income to a church, a practice known as tithing. This was often obligatory. It is no longer enforced by civil rulers, but some religious organisations still expect or require their members to pay a tithe.<ref>{{cite news| last=McClenaghan | first=Maeve | title='Exposed to horrendous things': young people in UK speak out against evangelical church |newspaper=The Guardian | date=29 November 2022 | url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2022/nov/29/young-uk-people-speak-out-against-evangelical-church-universal-kingdom-god}}</ref>
== Denmark ==
{{Further|Church of Denmark}}
The members of the national ] pay a church tax, called "''kirkeskat''". The rate varies among municipalities with a minimum of 0.4% and a maximum of 1.3% of taxable income in 2019.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.skm.dk/skattetal/satser/kommunal-beskatning/kommuneskatteprocenter-1977-2019 |title="Kommuneskatteprocenter 1977-2019 i regneark". Home page of Danish Ministry of Taxation, published 6 November 2017, accessed 19 January 2019. |access-date=19 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190119174754/https://www.skm.dk/skattetal/satser/kommunal-beskatning/kommuneskatteprocenter-1977-2019 |archive-date=19 January 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> The tax is generally around 0.7% of taxable income.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.skm.dk/skattetal/beregning/skatteberegning/skatteberegning-hovedtraekkene-i-personbeskatningen-2018 |title="Skatteberegning - hovedtrækkene i personbeskatningen 2018". Home page of Danish Ministry of Taxation, published 17 November 2017, accessed 19 January 2019. |access-date=19 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190119174558/https://www.skm.dk/skattetal/beregning/skatteberegning/skatteberegning-hovedtraekkene-i-personbeskatningen-2018 |archive-date=19 January 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> The collection of the church tax is administered by the Danish tax authorities, but the church tax is not considered as a genuine tax by, for example, ], but as a "voluntary transfer from households to the state".<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/Publikationer/VisPub?cid=21514 |title=Nationalregnskab og offentlige finanser ESA 2010 - Hovedrevison 2014. Report published by Statistics Denmark in September 2014. Quotation from page 52 (in English summary). |access-date=2019-01-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190119174805/https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/Publikationer/VisPub?cid=21514 |archive-date=2019-01-19 |url-status=live }}</ref>


== Countries that levy a church tax ==
The church tax does not cover the entire budget of the Church of Denmark. An additional 9% is paid by the government through block grants ("'']''"), which means that people who are not members of the Church of Denmark also finance its activities through taxes.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.humanistisksamfund.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Folkekirkens_%C3%B8konomi.pdf |title=Folkekirken i et samfundsøkonomisk perspektiv |access-date=2016-06-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160706072344/http://www.humanistisksamfund.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Folkekirkens_%C3%B8konomi.pdf |archive-date=2016-07-06 |url-status=live }}</ref>


==England== === Austria ===
Every recognized religious group in Austria can collect church tax at a rate of 1.1%, though currently only the Catholic and Protestant churches make use of that opportunity. Church tax is compulsory for Catholics in Austria.
Excerpts from ], '']'':


This tax was introduced into Austria by the German government in 1939 after the 1938 '']'' (annexation of Austria into Germany). After Austria received national independence again after ] the tax was retained in order to keep the churches independent of political powers.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.thetablet.co.uk/article/12697 |title=Austria's perilous journey |publisher=Thetablet.co.uk |access-date=2013-09-03 |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20090502075031/http://www.thetablet.co.uk/article/12697 |archive-date=2009-05-02 |url-status=live }}</ref>
===Definition and classification and those liable to pay tithes===
<blockquote>. . . tithes; which are defined to be the tenth part of the increase, yearly arising and renewing from the profits of lands, the stock upon lands, and the personal industry of the inhabitants:
:the first species being usually called ''predial,''<ref>from praedium, a farm</ref> as of corn, grass, hops, and wood;
:the second ''mixed'', as of wool, milk, pigs, &c, consisting of natural products, but nurtured and preserved in part by the care of man; and of these the tenth must be paid in gross:
:the third ''personal'', as of manual occupations, trades, fisheries, and the like; and of these only the tenth part of the clear gains and profits is due.
...
in general, tithes are to be paid for every thing that yields an annual increase, as corn, hay, fruit, cattle, poultry, and the like; but not for any thing that is of the substance of the earth, or is not of annual increase, as stone, lime, chalk, and the like; nor for creatures that are of a wild nature, or ''ferae naturae'', as deer, hawks, &c, whose increase, so as to profit the owner, is not annual, but casual.<ref name = 'BlackstoneII'>{{cite book |last=Blackstone |first=William |title=Commentaries on the Laws of England vol II |date=1766 |place=Oxford |publisher=Clarendon Press|title-link=Commentaries on the Laws of England }}</ref>{{rp|24}}</blockquote>


===History=== === Denmark ===
{{Further|Church of Denmark}}
<blockquote>We cannot precisely ascertain the time when tithes were first introduced into this country. Possibly they were contemporary with the planting of Christianity among the Saxons, by Augustin the monk, about the end of the fifth century. But the first mention of them, which I have met with in any written English law, is in a constitutional decree, made in a synod held A.D. 786, wherein the payment of tithes in general is strongly enjoined. This canon, or decree, which at first bound not the laity, was effectually confirmed by two kingdoms of the heptarchy, in their parliamentary conventions of estates, respectively consisting of the kings of Mercia and Northumberland, the bishops, dukes, senators, and people. Which was a few years later than the time that Charlemagne established the payment of them in France, and made that famous division of them into four parts; one to maintain the edifice of the church, the second to support the poor, the third the bishop, and the fourth the parochial clergy.<ref name = "BlackstoneII" />{{rp|25}}</blockquote>
The members of the national ] pay a church tax, called "''kirkeskat''". The rate varies among municipalities with a minimum of 0.4% and a maximum of 1.3% of taxable income in 2019.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.skm.dk/skattetal/satser/kommunal-beskatning/kommuneskatteprocenter-1977-2019 |title="Kommuneskatteprocenter 1977-2019 i regneark". Home page of Danish Ministry of Taxation, published 6 November 2017, accessed 19 January 2019. |access-date=19 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190119174754/https://www.skm.dk/skattetal/satser/kommunal-beskatning/kommuneskatteprocenter-1977-2019 |archive-date=19 January 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> The tax is generally around 0.7% of taxable income.<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.skm.dk/skattetal/beregning/skatteberegning/skatteberegning-hovedtraekkene-i-personbeskatningen-2018 |title="Skatteberegning - hovedtrækkene i personbeskatningen 2018". Home page of Danish Ministry of Taxation, published 17 November 2017, accessed 19 January 2019. |access-date=19 January 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190119174558/https://www.skm.dk/skattetal/beregning/skatteberegning/skatteberegning-hovedtraekkene-i-personbeskatningen-2018 |archive-date=19 January 2019 |url-status=live }}</ref> The collection of the church tax is administered by the Danish tax authorities, but the church tax is not considered as a genuine tax by, for example, ], but as a "voluntary transfer from households to the state".<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/Publikationer/VisPub?cid=21514 |title=Nationalregnskab og offentlige finanser ESA 2010 - Hovedrevison 2014. Report published by Statistics Denmark in September 2014. Quotation from page 52 (in English summary). |access-date=2019-01-19 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20190119174805/https://www.dst.dk/da/Statistik/Publikationer/VisPub?cid=21514 |archive-date=2019-01-19 |url-status=live }}</ref>

===Beneficiaries===
<blockquote>And upon their first introduction (as hath formerly been observed), though every man was obliged to pay tithes in general, yet he might give them to what priests he pleased; which were called ''arbitrary'' consecrations of tithes: or he might pay them into the hands of the bishop, who distributed among his diocesan clergy the revenues of the church, which were then in common. But, when dioceses were divided into parishes, the tithes of each parish were allotted to its own particular minister; first by common consent, or the appointment of lords of manors, and afterwards by the written law of the land.<ref name = "BlackstoneII" />{{rp|26}}

...It is now universally held, that tithes are due, of common right, to the ] of the ], unless there be a special exemption. This parson of the parish, we have formerly seen, may be either the actual ], or else the ] of the ]: appropriations being a method of endowing monasteries, which seems to have been devised by the regular clergy, by way of substitution to arbitrary consecrations of tithes.<ref name = "BlackstoneII" />{{rp|28}}</blockquote>

====Exemptions====
<blockquote>We observed that tithes are due to the parson of common right, unless by special exemption: let us therefore see, thirdly, who may be exempted from the payment of tithes ... either in part or totally, first, by a real composition; or secondly, by custom or prescription.

First, a real composition is when an agreement is made between the owner of the lands, and the parson or vicar, with the consent of the ordinary and the patron, that such lands shall for the future be discharged from payment of tithes, by reason of some land or other real recompence given to the parson, in lieu and satisfaction thereof.

Secondly, a discharge by custom or prescription, is where time out of mind such persons or such lands have been, either partially or totally, discharged from the payment of tithes. And this immemorial usage is binding upon all parties, as it is in its nature an evidence of universal consent and acquiescence; and with reason supposes a real composition to have been formerly made. This custom or prescription is either ''de modo decimandi'', or ''de non-decimando''.

A ''modus decimandi'', commonly called by the simple name of a ''modus'' only, is where there is by custom a particular manner of tithing allowed, different from the general law of taking tithes in kind, which are the actual tenth part of the annual increase. This is sometimes a pecuniary compensation, as twopence an acre for the tithe of land : sometimes it is a compensation in work and labour, as that the parson shall have only the twelfth cock of hay, and not the tenth, in consideration of the owner's making it for him: sometimes, in lieu of a large quantity of crude or imperfect tithe, the parson shall have a less quantity, when arrived to greater maturity, as a couple of fowls in lieu of tithe eggs; and the like. Any means, in short, whereby the general law of tithing is altered, and a new method of taking them is introduced, is called a ''modus decimandi'', or special manner of tithing.<ref name = "BlackstoneII" />{{rp|28–29}}

A prescription ''de non-decimando'' is a claim to be entirely discharged of tithes, and to pay no compensation in lieu of them. Thus the king by his prerogative is discharged from all tithes. So a vicar shall pay no tithes to the rector, nor the rector to the vicar, for ''ecclesia decimas non-folvit ecclesiae''. But these ''personal'' to both the king and the clergy; for their tenant or lessee shall pay tithes of the same land, though in their own occupation it is not tithable. And, generally speaking, it is an established rule, that in ''lay'' hands, ''modus de non-decimando non-valet''. But spiritual persons or corporations, as monasteries, abbots, bishops, and the like, were always capable of having their lands totally discharged of tithes, by various ways: as
#By real composition :
#By the pope's ] of exemption :
#By unity of possession; as when the rectory of a parish, and lands in the same parish, both belonged to a religious house, those lands were discharged of tithes by this unity of possession :
#By prescription; having never been liable to tithes, by being always in spiritual hands :
#By virtue of their order; as the ], ], and others, whose lands were privileged by the pope with a discharge of tithes. Though, upon the dissolution of abbeys by ], most of these exemptions from tithes would have fallen with them, and the lands become tithable again; had they not been supported and upheld by the statute 31 Hen. VIII. c. 13. which enacts, that all persons who should come to the possession of the lands of any abbey then dissolved, should hold them free and discharged of tithes, in as large and ample a manner as the abbeys themselves formerly held them. And from this original have sprung all the lands, which, being in lay hands, do at present claim to be tithe-free: for, if a man can shew his lands to have been such abbey lands, and also immemorially discharged of tithes by any of the means before-mentioned, this is now a good prescription ''de non-decimando''. But he must shew both these requisites; for abbey lands, without a special ground of discharge, are not discharged of course; neither will any prescription ''de non-decimando'' avail in total discharge of tithes, unless it relates to such abbeylands.<ref name = "BlackstoneII" />{{rp|31–32}}</blockquote>


The church tax does not cover the entire budget of the Church of Denmark. An additional 9% is paid by the government through block grants ("'']''"), which means that even people who are not members of the Church of Denmark finance its activities through taxes.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.humanistisksamfund.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Folkekirkens_%C3%B8konomi.pdf |title=Folkekirken i et samfundsøkonomisk perspektiv |access-date=2016-06-12 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160706072344/http://www.humanistisksamfund.dk/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Folkekirkens_%C3%B8konomi.pdf |archive-date=2016-07-06 |url-status=live }}</ref>
<gallery widths="220px" heights="150px">
Image:The tithe barn, Abbotsbury near Weymouth.jpg|The Tithe Barn, ], Dorset (scene of the sheep-shearing in ]'s '']'')
Image:Tithe Barn at Bradford on Avon.JPG| ] at Bradford on Avon, West Wiltshire
Image:Tithe Barn Pilton interior.jpg|Interior of the ], Somerset
File:GrangeBarn-interior.jpg|], Essex; the timber has been dated to between 1130 and 1270.
</gallery>


== Finland == === Finland ===
All members of the ] and the ], the two state churches of Finland, pay an income-based church tax of between 1% and 2% (average about 1.4%), depending on the ]. Members can formally leave the church, becoming exempt from the tax from the following year. Studies have found that people leave the church in Finland mainly due to the general secularization of society, not to become exempt from the tax.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.eroakirkosta.fi/media/none/tiedote_12_2015.html?year=2015 |title=Eroakirkosta.fi - Kirkollisverotus kiristynyt 2010-luvulla |access-date=2016-07-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160731055118/http://eroakirkosta.fi/media/none/tiedote_12_2015.html?year=2015 |archive-date=2016-07-31 |url-status=live }}</ref> All members of the ] and the ], the two state churches of Finland, pay an income-based church tax of between 1% and 2% (average about 1.4%), depending on the ]. Members can formally leave the church, becoming exempt from the tax from the following year. Studies have found that people leave the church in Finland mainly due to the general secularization of society, not to become exempt from the tax.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.eroakirkosta.fi/media/none/tiedote_12_2015.html?year=2015 |title=Eroakirkosta.fi - Kirkollisverotus kiristynyt 2010-luvulla |date=19 December 2015 |access-date=2016-07-24 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160731055118/http://eroakirkosta.fi/media/none/tiedote_12_2015.html?year=2015 |archive-date=2016-07-31 |url-status=live }}</ref>


== Germany == === Germany ===
] dated September 17, 1923]] ] dated September 17, 1923]]


About 70% of ] revenues come from ''church tax'' (Kirchensteuer), also called ''worship tax'' (Kultussteuer) when referring to non-Christian religious bodies such as Jewish ]. This is about ]9.2 billion (in 2010). About 70% of ] revenues come from ''church tax'' (Kirchensteuer), also called ''worship tax'' (Kultussteuer) when referring to non-Christian religious bodies such as Jewish ]. This was about ]13.1 billion in 2022.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/12520/umfrage/kirchensteuer-einnahmen-in-deutschland/#:~:text=Die%20Statistik%20zeigt%20die%20Einnahmen,Euro%20durch%20die%20Kirchensteuer%20ein | title=Einnahmen durch die Kirchensteuer in Deutschland bis 2022 }}</ref>


Article 137 of the ] of 1919 and article 140 of the German ] of 1949 form the legal bases for this practice. Article 137 of the ] of 1919 and article 140 of the German ] of 1949 form the legal bases for this practice.


In Germany, on the basis of tax regulations passed by the religious communities and within the limits set by state laws, communities may either In Germany, on the basis of tax regulations passed by the religious communities and within the limits set by state laws, communities may either:
* require the taxation authorities of the state to collect the fees from the members on the basis of income tax assessment (then, the authorities withhold a collection fee), or * require the taxation authorities of the state to collect the fees from the members on the basis of income tax assessment (then, the authorities withhold a collection fee), or
* choose to collect the church tax themselves. * choose to collect the church tax themselves.
Line 81: Line 48:
The church tax is only paid by members of the respective church, although the concept of "membership" is far from clear, and it may be asked what right the secular state has to tell the faithful what contribution they should make to their own denomination. People who are not members of a church tax-collecting denomination do not have to pay it. Members of a religious community may formally cease to be considered members by making a declaration to state (not religious) authorities, ending liability to pay church taxes. Some religious communities refuse religious marriages and funerals to members who leave.<ref name=":0" /> The church tax is only paid by members of the respective church, although the concept of "membership" is far from clear, and it may be asked what right the secular state has to tell the faithful what contribution they should make to their own denomination. People who are not members of a church tax-collecting denomination do not have to pay it. Members of a religious community may formally cease to be considered members by making a declaration to state (not religious) authorities, ending liability to pay church taxes. Some religious communities refuse religious marriages and funerals to members who leave.<ref name=":0" />


The money flow of state and churches is distinct at all levels of the procedures. Income on which church tax is paid is not subject to state income tax (as are voluntary contributions to the Church, for charity or other privileged purposes), so that in effect the state subsidises the church to some extent. The cost to the state of collecting church tax is reimbursed by the church.. The money flow of state and churches is distinct at all levels of the procedures. Income on which church tax is paid is not subject to state income tax (as are voluntary contributions to the Church, for charity or other privileged purposes), so that in effect the state subsidises the church to some extent. The cost to the state of collecting church tax is reimbursed by the church.
The church tax is historically rooted in the pre-Christian Germanic custom whereby the chief of the tribe was directly responsible for the maintenance of priests and religious groups. During the ] of Western Europe, this custom was adopted by the ] and Catholic Christian churches in the concept of "Eigenkirchen" (churches owned by the landlord), which stood in strong contrast to the central church organization of the Roman Catholic Church. Despite the resulting medieval conflict between emperor and pope, the concept of church maintenance by the ruler remained the accepted custom in most Western European countries. In Reformation times the ], and were legally responsible for the maintenance of churches. Not until the 19th century were the finances of churches and state regulated to a point where the churches became financially independent. At this point, the church tax was introduced to replace the state benefits the churches had obtained previously.


The church tax is historically rooted in the pre-Christian Germanic custom whereby the chief of the tribe was directly responsible for the maintenance of priests and religious groups. During the ] of Western Europe, this custom was adopted by the Catholic and ] churches in the concept of "Eigenkirchen" (churches owned by the landlord), which stood in strong contrast to the central church organization of the Catholic Church. Despite the resulting medieval conflict between emperor and pope, the concept of church maintenance by the ruler remained the accepted custom in most Western European countries. In Reformation times the ], and were legally responsible for the maintenance of churches. Not until the 19th century were the finances of churches and state regulated to a point where the churches became financially independent. At this point, the church tax was introduced to replace the state benefits the churches had obtained previously.
The church tax was reaffirmed in Article 13 of the ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.concordatwatch.eu/topic-752.834|title=Germany {{!}} Hitler's concordat (1933)|publisher=Concordat Watch|access-date=2019-09-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170918191352/http://www.concordatwatch.eu/topic-752.834|archive-date=2017-09-18|url-status=live}}</ref> which guaranteed the right of the Church to levy taxes. Taxpayers, whether ], ] or members of other tax-collecting communities, pay an amount equal to 8% in ] and ], and 9% in the rest of the country, of their ] to the church or religious community to which they belong.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-1400296_ITM |title=The politics of appointments to protestant theological faculties in Germany: the case of professor Erich Geldbach |publisher=Accessmylibrary.com |access-date=2013-09-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100928035046/http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-1400296_ITM |archive-date=2010-09-28 |url-status=live }}</ref> For example, a person earning €50,000 may pay income tax at 20% (€10,000); the church tax is an additional 8% (or 9%) of that sum (€800 or €900).<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|date=2012-09-24|title=German Catholics lose church rights for unpaid tax|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-19699581|access-date=2021-06-07}}</ref>

The church tax was reaffirmed in Article 13 of the ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.concordatwatch.eu/topic-752.834|title=Germany {{!}} Hitler's concordat (1933)|publisher=Concordat Watch|access-date=2019-09-06|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170918191352/http://www.concordatwatch.eu/topic-752.834|archive-date=2017-09-18|url-status=live}}</ref> which guaranteed the right of the Church to levy taxes. Taxpayers, whether ], ] or members of other tax-collecting communities, pay an amount equal to 8% in ] and ], and 9% in the rest of the country, of their ] to the church or religious community to which they belong.<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-1400296_ITM |title=The politics of appointments to protestant theological faculties in Germany: the case of professor Erich Geldbach |publisher=Accessmylibrary.com |access-date=2013-09-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100928035046/http://www.accessmylibrary.com/coms2/summary_0286-1400296_ITM |archive-date=2010-09-28 |url-status=live }}</ref> For example, a person earning €50,000 may pay income tax at 20% (€10,000); the church tax is an additional 8% (or 9%) of that sum (€800 or €900).<ref name=":0">{{Cite news|date=2012-09-24|title=German Catholics lose church rights for unpaid tax|language=en-GB|work=BBC News|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-19699581|access-date=2021-06-07}}</ref> The paid church tax is deductable in year of paying and reduces the taxable income.

Since 2015, private companies have to take part at the "church tax deduction procedure" ("Kirchensteuerabzugsverfahren"). This should ensure, that also shareholder of private companies pay church taxes on dividends.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.taxura.de/aktuelles/details/kirchensteuerabzugsverfahren-in-der-praxis-leitfaden-fuer-gmbh-geschaeftsfuehrer.html | title=Kirchensteuerabzugsverfahren in der Praxis: Leitfaden für GMBH-Geschäftsführer - TAXURA }}</ref> This regulation was introduced because capital gains in Germany can be taxed at a flat rate since 2009 and therefore do not have to be declared in the income tax return. There was therefore an enforcement deficit.


In 2017, Germany's Catholic church recorded approximately €6&nbsp;billion tax take, split across its 27 different dioceses or church districts, despite a massive dip in attendance (according to the newspaper '']'', church attendance had dropped by more than 2.2&nbsp;million since the start of the millennium). Fifty years before Catholic church attendance exceeded 11 million, but had dropped to 2.5&nbsp;million. The German Church also has a total fortune of at least €20 billion. The three highest-income dioceses are Paderborn, at €3.5 billion, Munich at €2.8 billion, and Cologne at €2.6 billion. In 2017, Germany's Catholic church recorded approximately €6&nbsp;billion tax take, split across its 27 different dioceses or church districts, despite a massive dip in attendance (according to the newspaper '']'', church attendance had dropped by more than 2.2&nbsp;million since the start of the millennium). Fifty years before Catholic church attendance exceeded 11 million, but had dropped to 2.5&nbsp;million. The German Church also has a total fortune of at least €20 billion. The three highest-income dioceses are Paderborn, at €3.5 billion, Munich at €2.8 billion, and Cologne at €2.6 billion.
Line 90: Line 60:
People moving to Germany must declare their religious affiliation. The state-administered church tax is very successful at compelling tax payment, but many residents can avoid paying it, for example by not being a practising member of a faith. This has led to many people declaring they have abandoned the religion of their birth; it is not known what proportion do this only to avoid the tax.{{Clarify|date=June 2023|reason=the text as it stands on 27Jun23 implies that everybody must have a faith, whether practising or not. Is there no provision for people who do not have a religion?}} People moving to Germany must declare their religious affiliation. The state-administered church tax is very successful at compelling tax payment, but many residents can avoid paying it, for example by not being a practising member of a faith. This has led to many people declaring they have abandoned the religion of their birth; it is not known what proportion do this only to avoid the tax.{{Clarify|date=June 2023|reason=the text as it stands on 27Jun23 implies that everybody must have a faith, whether practising or not. Is there no provision for people who do not have a religion?}}


== Iceland == === Iceland ===
Taxpayers in Iceland who belong to an ] or secular humanist organization<ref name="report2014">{{cite web | url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/religiousfreedom/index.htm?year=2014&dlid=238390 | title=International Religious Freedom Report for 2014: Iceland | access-date=2015-12-07 | author=Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor | date=2014 | publisher=]}}</ref> must pay a congregation tax (Icelandic: ''sóknargjald'', plural ''sóknargjöld'')<ref name="innan">{{cite web | url=https://www.innanrikisraduneyti.is/raduneyti/starfssvid/kirkjumal/almennt/ | title=Kirkjumál og skráð trúfélög og lífsskoðunarfélög | access-date=2015-12-07 | publisher=] (Innanríkisráðuneytið) | language=is | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160323172941/https://www.innanrikisraduneyti.is/raduneyti/starfssvid/kirkjumal/almennt/ | archive-date=2016-03-23 | url-status=live }}</ref> which is deducted from income taxes and goes to their organization.<ref name="report2014"/> The ''sóknargjald'' of those who did not belong to any recognized religious organization formerly went to the ].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2004/35460.htm | title=International Religious Freedom Report for 2004: Iceland | access-date=2015-12-07 | author=Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor | date=2004 | publisher=]}}</ref> This was changed in 2009;<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.althingi.is/altext/137/s/0155.html | title=Frumvarp til laga um ráðstafanir í ríkisfjármálum | access-date=2015-12-07 | date=2009 | publisher=] | language=is | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151208071858/http://www.althingi.is/altext/137/s/0155.html | archive-date=2015-12-08 | url-status=live }}</ref> people not belonging to a registered religious group or secular humanist organization must pay the same amount in tax, which is treated as income tax rather than paid to a church. In 2015, the monthly ''sóknargjald'' amounted to 824&nbsp;],<ref name="innan"/> about $US6. In March 2021, Judaism was added to Iceland’s list of state-recognised religious groups.<ref></ref> Taxpayers in Iceland who belong to an ] or secular humanist organization<ref name="report2014">{{cite web | url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/religiousfreedom/index.htm?year=2014&dlid=238390 | title=International Religious Freedom Report for 2014: Iceland | access-date=2015-12-07 | author=Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor | date=2014 | publisher=]}}</ref> must pay a congregation tax (Icelandic: ''sóknargjald'', plural ''sóknargjöld'')<ref name="innan">{{cite web | url=https://www.innanrikisraduneyti.is/raduneyti/starfssvid/kirkjumal/almennt/ | title=Kirkjumál og skráð trúfélög og lífsskoðunarfélög | access-date=2015-12-07 | publisher=] (Innanríkisráðuneytið) | language=is | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160323172941/https://www.innanrikisraduneyti.is/raduneyti/starfssvid/kirkjumal/almennt/ | archive-date=2016-03-23 | url-status=live }}</ref> which is deducted from income taxes and goes to their organization.<ref name="report2014"/> The ''sóknargjald'' of those who did not belong to any recognized religious organization formerly went to the ].<ref>{{cite web | url=https://2009-2017.state.gov/j/drl/rls/irf/2004/35460.htm | title=International Religious Freedom Report for 2004: Iceland | access-date=2015-12-07 | author=Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor | date=2004 | publisher=]}}</ref> This was changed in 2009;<ref>{{cite web | url=http://www.althingi.is/altext/137/s/0155.html | title=Frumvarp til laga um ráðstafanir í ríkisfjármálum | access-date=2015-12-07 | date=2009 | publisher=] | language=is | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151208071858/http://www.althingi.is/altext/137/s/0155.html | archive-date=2015-12-08 | url-status=live }}</ref> people not belonging to a registered religious group or secular humanist organization must pay the same amount in tax, which is treated as income tax rather than paid to a church. In 2015, the monthly ''sóknargjald'' amounted to 824&nbsp;],<ref name="innan"/> about $US6. In March 2021, Judaism was added to Iceland’s list of state-recognised religious groups.<ref></ref>


The ] receives governmental support beyond the congregation taxes paid by its members. The ] receives governmental support beyond the congregation taxes paid by its members.


== Italy == === Italy ===
{{Main|Eight per thousand}} {{Main|Eight per thousand}}
{{see also|Public funding of the Catholic Church in Italy}}
Taxpayers in Italy pay a mandatory ] tax, and have the option to choose to whom they will assign the funds. This tax amounts to 0.8% of the total income tax (IRPEF) and every taxpayer can choose the recipient of the contribution on their tax form. Regardless of whether the taxpayer expresses a preference or not, the 0.8% is already included in their tax levy. Taxpayers in Italy pay a mandatory ] tax, and have the option to choose to whom they will assign the funds. This tax amounts to 0.8% of the total income tax (IRPEF) and every taxpayer can choose the recipient of the contribution on their tax form. Regardless of whether the taxpayer expresses a preference or not, the 0.8% is already included in their tax levy.


Currently the choices are: Currently the choices are:
* Italian State * Italian State
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
* ] * ]
Line 115: Line 86:
If the choice is not expressly declared on the tax form, the tax is distributed according to the percentages of the taxpayers who have declared their choice of beneficiary. While it was intended that the state should use its own share of the 0.8% tax for social or cultural purposes, in practice it has employed it for general purposes including its military mission in Iraq in 2004<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150510141757/http://www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Cronache/2006/11_Novembre/10/crespi.shtml |date=2015-05-10 }} - ''Corriere della Sera'' 10 November 2006</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Servizio Studi - Dipartimento bilancio (A) |url=http://documenti.camera.it/leg16/dossier/Testi/BI0026.htm |title=Camera dei deputati Dossier BI0026 |publisher=Documenti.camera.it |date=2008-09-22 |access-date=2013-09-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150425211815/http://documenti.camera.it/leg16/dossier/Testi/BI0026.htm |archive-date=2015-04-25 |url-status=live }}</ref> and the upgrading of prison infrastructure in 2011.<ref>{{cite web |author=Carlo Alberto Bucci |url=http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2011/12/29/beni-artistici-restano-secco-57-milioni.html |title=Carlo Alberto Bucci, "I beni artistici restano a secco i 57 milioni dell'8 per mille vanno all'emergenza carceri" in ''La Repubblica'', 29 December 2011. Retrieved 3 May 2012 |language=it |publisher=Ricerca.repubblica.it |date=2011-12-29 |access-date=2013-09-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120114132001/http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2011/12/29/beni-artistici-restano-secco-57-milioni.html |archive-date=14 January 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref> If the choice is not expressly declared on the tax form, the tax is distributed according to the percentages of the taxpayers who have declared their choice of beneficiary. While it was intended that the state should use its own share of the 0.8% tax for social or cultural purposes, in practice it has employed it for general purposes including its military mission in Iraq in 2004<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150510141757/http://www.corriere.it/Primo_Piano/Cronache/2006/11_Novembre/10/crespi.shtml |date=2015-05-10 }} - ''Corriere della Sera'' 10 November 2006</ref><ref>{{cite web |author=Servizio Studi - Dipartimento bilancio (A) |url=http://documenti.camera.it/leg16/dossier/Testi/BI0026.htm |title=Camera dei deputati Dossier BI0026 |publisher=Documenti.camera.it |date=2008-09-22 |access-date=2013-09-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150425211815/http://documenti.camera.it/leg16/dossier/Testi/BI0026.htm |archive-date=2015-04-25 |url-status=live }}</ref> and the upgrading of prison infrastructure in 2011.<ref>{{cite web |author=Carlo Alberto Bucci |url=http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2011/12/29/beni-artistici-restano-secco-57-milioni.html |title=Carlo Alberto Bucci, "I beni artistici restano a secco i 57 milioni dell'8 per mille vanno all'emergenza carceri" in ''La Repubblica'', 29 December 2011. Retrieved 3 May 2012 |language=it |publisher=Ricerca.repubblica.it |date=2011-12-29 |access-date=2013-09-03 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120114132001/http://ricerca.repubblica.it/repubblica/archivio/repubblica/2011/12/29/beni-artistici-restano-secco-57-milioni.html |archive-date=14 January 2012 |url-status=live }}</ref>


== Spain == === Spain ===
The Spanish tax declaration form has one checkbox for the Catholic Church, none for other religious groups and a second checkbox for activities of social interest. These checkboxes don't influence the total tax amount, but make that for each ticked checkbox 0.7% of the total amount are used as indicated. <ref name="Periódico">{{cite web|url=https://www.elperiodico.com/es/economia/declaracion-renta/20220623/dinero-casilla-iglesia-casilla-solidaria-declaracion-renta-13678769|date=2022-06-23|language=es|title=¿Qué hace Hacienda con tu dinero si no marcas la casilla solidaria ni la Iglesia en la declaración de la renta?|access-date=2022-07-31|website=El Periódico}}</ref> The Spanish tax declaration form has a checkbox that allows the taxpayer to allocate 0.7% of their taxes to support the Catholic Church. This checkbox does not influence the total taxes paid; leaving the checkbox blank allocates the same money for general purposes.<ref name="Periódico">{{cite web|url=https://www.elperiodico.com/es/economia/declaracion-renta/20220623/dinero-casilla-iglesia-casilla-solidaria-declaracion-renta-13678769|date=2022-06-23|language=es|title=¿Qué hace Hacienda con tu dinero si no marcas la casilla solidaria ni la Iglesia en la declaración de la renta?|access-date=2022-07-31|website=El Periódico}}</ref>


== Sweden == === Sweden ===
The members of ] pay church fee, which varies between municipalities, but can be as much as 2%. ] as of 2000; however, the burial tax (''begravningsavgift'') is paid by everyone regardless of membership. The members of ] pay church fee, which varies between municipalities, but can be as much as 2%. ] as of 2000; however, the burial tax (''begravningsavgift'') is paid by everyone regardless of membership.


In a recent{{when|date=June 2017}} development, the Swedish government has agreed to continue collecting from individual taxpayers the annual payment that has always gone to the church. But now the fee will be an optional checkoff box on the tax return. The government will allocate the money collected to Catholic, Muslim, Jewish and other faiths as well as the Lutherans, with each taxpayer directing where his or her taxes should go. In a recent{{when|date=June 2017}} development, the Swedish government has agreed to continue collecting from individual taxpayers the annual payment that has always gone to the church. But now the fee will be an optional checkoff box on the tax return. The government will allocate the money collected to Catholic, Muslim, Jewish and other faiths as well as the Lutherans, with each taxpayer directing where his or her taxes should go.


== Switzerland == === Switzerland ===
There is no official state church in Switzerland. However, except Geneva and Neuchâtel, each canton (state) financially supports at least one of the three traditional denominations – ], ] (in Switzerland ]), or Evangelical ] – with funds collected through taxation. Each canton church tax may formally have to leave the church.{{clarify|date=April 2019}} In some cantons private companies are unable to avoid payment of the church tax.<ref>{{cite web There is no official state church in Switzerland. However, except Geneva and Neuchâtel, each canton (state) financially supports at least one of the three traditional denominations – ], ] (in Switzerland ]), or Evangelical ] – with funds collected through taxation. Each canton church tax may formally have to leave the church.{{clarify|date=April 2019}} In some cantons private companies are unable to avoid payment of the church tax.<ref>{{cite web
|title= Die Kirchensteuern |title= Die Kirchensteuern
|url= http://www.estv.admin.ch/dokumentation/00079/00080/00736/index.html |url= http://www.estv.admin.ch/dokumentation/00079/00080/00736/index.html
Line 135: Line 106:
}}</ref> }}</ref>


In Geneva and Neuchâtel there is no church tax : each taxpayer is free to make a voluntary tax deductible contribution or gift to his church, either directly to the beneficiary or using the canton (state) tax system.<ref>{{cite web |title=Les Eglises de Neuchâtel encouragent le versement de l'impôt ecclésiastique |url=https://www.rts.ch/info/regions/neuchatel/10702293-les-eglises-de-neuchatel-encouragent-le-versement-de-l-impot-ecclesiastique.html |website=www.rts.ch/ |access-date=22 November 2019}}</ref> In Geneva and Neuchâtel there is no church tax; each taxpayer is free to make a voluntary tax deductible contribution or gift to his church, either directly to the beneficiary or using the canton (state) tax system.<ref>{{cite web |title=Les Eglises de Neuchâtel encouragent le versement de l'impôt ecclésiastique |url=https://www.rts.ch/info/regions/neuchatel/10702293-les-eglises-de-neuchatel-encouragent-le-versement-de-l-impot-ecclesiastique.html |website=www.rts.ch/ |date=12 September 2019 |access-date=22 November 2019}}</ref>

== Countries that have ended church taxes ==

=== England ===
There has long been no church tax in United Kingdom. ] was obligatory in England centuries ago.<ref name = 'BlackstoneII'>{{cite book |last=Blackstone |first=William|author-link=William Blackstone|title=Commentaries on the Laws of England vol II |date=1766 |place=Oxford |publisher=Clarendon Press|title-link=Commentaries on the Laws of England }}</ref>

=== France ===
France abolished the church tax in 1789.

=== Mexico ===
Mexico abolished the church tax in 1833.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://memoricamexico.gob.mx/es/memorica/Temas?ctId=3&cId=YWQ4YjE3OTctYWJlNy00OWI2LTlmODEtNTEyZTcwMWJiYjJj&cd=false | title=Suspensión del diezmo eclesiástico }}</ref>


== United States == === United States ===
{{See also|Johnson Amendment}} {{See also|Johnson Amendment}}
<!--Most, or all, of this section, which is not about current levying of taxes from citizens to support a church, could well be deleted.-->
In the ], churches are generally exempt from paying taxes.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf | title = Tax Guide for Churches and Religious Organizations | author = Internal Revenue Service | access-date = July 4, 2021 }}</ref> The ] has held that tax exemption for churches is constitutional under the ]<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/397/664 | title = Walz v. Tax Comm'n, 397 U.S. 664 (1970) | website = Legal Information Institute | publisher = Cornell Law School | access-date = July 4, 2021 }}</ref> and that churches and religious organizations may be subject to a general sales and use tax;<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/493/378 | title = Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. California Bd. of Equalization, 493 U.S. 378 (1990)| website = Legal Information Institute | publisher = Cornell Law School | access-date = July 4, 2021 }}</ref> however, the Court has not addressed whether government may enact a specific "church tax".<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/tax-exemptions-of-religious-property| title = Tax Exemptions of Religious Property. | website = Legal Information Institute | publisher = Cornell Law School | access-date = July 4, 2021 }}</ref> The ] of the ] prohibits the ] and (through ])<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/incorporation_doctrine | title = Incorporation Doctrine | website = Legal Information Institute | publisher = Cornell Law School | access-date = July 3, 2018 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180703075923/https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/incorporation_doctrine | archive-date = July 3, 2018 | url-status = live }}</ref> the 50 ] governments from establishing a state religion or favoring one religion over another.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/establishment_clause| title = Establishment Clause | website = Legal Information Institute | publisher = Cornell Law School | access-date = July 4, 2021 }}</ref> The English colonies which later became the United States had tax provisions to support religion, but the ] explicitly separates church and state, and no church tax is levied from citizens. Churches are generally exempt from paying taxes.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p1828.pdf | title = Tax Guide for Churches and Religious Organizations | author = Internal Revenue Service | access-date = July 4, 2021 }}</ref> The ] has held that tax exemption for churches is constitutional under the ]<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/397/664 | title = Walz v. Tax Comm'n, 397 U.S. 664 (1970) | website = Legal Information Institute | publisher = Cornell Law School | access-date = July 4, 2021 }}</ref> and that churches and religious organizations may be subject to a general sales and use tax;<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/493/378 | title = Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. California Bd. of Equalization, 493 U.S. 378 (1990)| website = Legal Information Institute | publisher = Cornell Law School | access-date = July 4, 2021 }}</ref> however, the Court has not addressed whether government may enact a specific "church tax".<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/amendment-1/tax-exemptions-of-religious-property| title = Tax Exemptions of Religious Property. | website = Legal Information Institute | publisher = Cornell Law School | access-date = July 4, 2021 }}</ref> The Establishment Clause of the US Constitution prohibits the ] and (through ])<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/incorporation_doctrine | title = Incorporation Doctrine | website = Legal Information Institute | publisher = Cornell Law School | access-date = July 3, 2018 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20180703075923/https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/incorporation_doctrine | archive-date = July 3, 2018 | url-status = live }}</ref> the 50 ] governments from establishing a state religion or favoring one religion over another.<ref>{{cite web | url = https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/establishment_clause| title = Establishment Clause | website = Legal Information Institute | publisher = Cornell Law School | access-date = July 4, 2021 }}</ref>


Prior to American independence, most of the original colonies supported religious activities with taxes, with each colony often choosing a single church as their official religion. These official churches enjoyed privileges not granted to other religious groups.<ref name="Pew">{{cite web|url=https://www.pewforum.org/2009/05/14/shifting-boundaries2/|work=www.pewforum.org|title=Public Funding of Religious Activity in 18th-Century America|date=May 14, 2009|access-date=October 25, 2020}}</ref> ] and ] supported the ] through tax.<ref>{{cite book | last = Bremer | first = Francis J. | title = The Puritan Experiment: New England Society from Bradford to Edwards | publisher = ] | edition = Revised | date = 1995 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=zm0fkTXsvg8C | isbn = 9780874517286 | page = 226 }}</ref> In colonial ], the ] benefited from church taxes.<ref>{{cite book | last = Bolton | first = S. Charles | title = Southern Anglicanism: The Church of England in Colonial South Carolina | publisher = Greenwood Press | date = 1982 | location = Westport, Connecticut | pages = | isbn = 9780313230905 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/southernanglican0000bolt/page/24 }}</ref> Other colonies would more generally support religion by requiring taxes that would partially fund religious institutions - taxpayers could direct payments to the Protestant denomination of their choosing. Only the colonies of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island did not require a tax to support religion. During and after the American Revolution, religious minorities, such as the Methodists and the Baptists, argued that taxes to support religion violated freedoms won from the British. Defenders of the practice argued that government needed to fund religious institutions because public virtue depended on these institutions which could not survive purely on private support.<ref name="Pew"/> Prior to American independence, most of the original colonies supported religious activities with taxes, with each colony often choosing a single church as their official religion. These official churches enjoyed privileges not granted to other religious groups.<ref name="Pew">{{cite web|url=https://www.pewforum.org/2009/05/14/shifting-boundaries2/|work=www.pewforum.org|title=Public Funding of Religious Activity in 18th-Century America|date=May 14, 2009|access-date=October 25, 2020}}</ref> ] and ] supported the ] through tax.<ref>{{cite book | last = Bremer | first = Francis J. | title = The Puritan Experiment: New England Society from Bradford to Edwards | publisher = ] | edition = Revised | date = 1995 | url = https://books.google.com/books?id=zm0fkTXsvg8C | isbn = 9780874517286 | page = 226 }}</ref> In colonial ], the ] benefited from church taxes.<ref>{{cite book | last = Bolton | first = S. Charles | title = Southern Anglicanism: The Church of England in Colonial South Carolina | publisher = Greenwood Press | date = 1982 | location = Westport, Connecticut | pages = | isbn = 9780313230905 | url-access = registration | url = https://archive.org/details/southernanglican0000bolt/page/24 }}</ref> Other colonies would more generally support religion by requiring taxes that would partially fund religious institutions - taxpayers could direct payments to the Protestant denomination of their choosing. Only the colonies of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island did not require a tax to support religion. During and after the American Revolution, religious minorities, such as the Methodists and the Baptists, argued that taxes to support religion violated freedoms won from the British. Defenders of the practice argued that government needed to fund religious institutions because public virtue depended on these institutions which could not survive purely on private support.<ref name="Pew"/>
Line 145: Line 128:
==See also== ==See also==
*] *]
*], federal tax code exemptions for churches, similar religious entities, and other recognized non-profit groups in the United States *], U.S. tax-exemption for churches, religious organizations, charities, and certain other nonprofit organizations
*], income not subject to federal tax that is paid to ordained ministers in both Canada and the United States *], income not subject to federal income tax that is paid to ordained ministers in both Canada and the United States
*] *]
*] *]

Latest revision as of 15:28, 14 November 2024

State-imposed tax to fund churches
Globe icon.The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with Europe and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (June 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this message)
Part of a series on
Taxation
An aspect of fiscal policy
Policies
Economics
General Theory
Distribution of Tax
Collection
Noncompliance
General
Corporate
Locations
Major examples
Types
International
Trade
Research
Academic
Advocacy groups
Religious
By country
All Countries
Individual Countries

A church tax is a tax collected by the state from members of some religious denominations to provide financial support of churches, such as the salaries of its clergy and to pay the operating cost of the church. Not all countries have such a tax. In some countries that do, people who are not members of a religious community are exempt from the tax; in others it is always levied, with the payer often entitled to choose who receives it, typically the state or an activity of social interest.

The constitution of a number of countries could be and have been interpreted as both supporting and prohibiting the levying of taxes unto churches; prohibiting church tax could separate church and state fiscally, but it could also be favorable treatment by the government. The term "church tax" could mean a tax levied on a religious organisation by a state, or relate to tax exemptions and so on for churches, but this article is about a tax levied on individuals.

Tithing

Main article: Tithe

In the past it was usual for people to be expected to pay a part of their production (e.g., agricultural produce) or income to a church, a practice known as tithing. This was often obligatory. It is no longer enforced by civil rulers, but some religious organisations still expect or require their members to pay a tithe.

Countries that levy a church tax

Austria

Every recognized religious group in Austria can collect church tax at a rate of 1.1%, though currently only the Catholic and Protestant churches make use of that opportunity. Church tax is compulsory for Catholics in Austria.

This tax was introduced into Austria by the German government in 1939 after the 1938 Anschluss (annexation of Austria into Germany). After Austria received national independence again after World War II the tax was retained in order to keep the churches independent of political powers.

Denmark

Further information: Church of Denmark

The members of the national Church of Denmark pay a church tax, called "kirkeskat". The rate varies among municipalities with a minimum of 0.4% and a maximum of 1.3% of taxable income in 2019. The tax is generally around 0.7% of taxable income. The collection of the church tax is administered by the Danish tax authorities, but the church tax is not considered as a genuine tax by, for example, Statistics Denmark, but as a "voluntary transfer from households to the state".

The church tax does not cover the entire budget of the Church of Denmark. An additional 9% is paid by the government through block grants ("bloktilskud"), which means that even people who are not members of the Church of Denmark finance its activities through taxes.

Finland

All members of the Evangelical Lutheran Church of Finland and the Finnish Orthodox Church, the two state churches of Finland, pay an income-based church tax of between 1% and 2% (average about 1.4%), depending on the municipality. Members can formally leave the church, becoming exempt from the tax from the following year. Studies have found that people leave the church in Finland mainly due to the general secularization of society, not to become exempt from the tax.

Germany

Receipt dated September 17, 1923

About 70% of church revenues come from church tax (Kirchensteuer), also called worship tax (Kultussteuer) when referring to non-Christian religious bodies such as Jewish synagogues. This was about 13.1 billion in 2022.

Article 137 of the Weimar Constitution of 1919 and article 140 of the German Basic Law of 1949 form the legal bases for this practice.

In Germany, on the basis of tax regulations passed by the religious communities and within the limits set by state laws, communities may either:

  • require the taxation authorities of the state to collect the fees from the members on the basis of income tax assessment (then, the authorities withhold a collection fee), or
  • choose to collect the church tax themselves.

In the first case, membership in the religious community is stored in a database at the Federal Tax Office which employers receive excerpts of for the purpose of withholding tax on paid income. If an employee's data indicate membership in a tax-collecting religious community, the employer must withhold church tax prepayments from their income in addition to other taxes. The state revenue authorities assess the church tax due at the annual tax assessment. State revenue authorities collect prepayment of church tax (and income tax) from self-employed persons and unemployed taxpayers.

If, however, religious communities choose to collect church tax themselves, they may demand that the tax authorities reveal taxation data of their members to calculate the contributions and prepayments owed. In particular, some smaller communities (e.g., the Jewish Community of Berlin) choose to collect taxes themselves to save collection fees the government would charge otherwise.

Church tax collected may be used to cover any church-related expenses such as funding institutions and foundations and paying ministers.

The church tax is only paid by members of the respective church, although the concept of "membership" is far from clear, and it may be asked what right the secular state has to tell the faithful what contribution they should make to their own denomination. People who are not members of a church tax-collecting denomination do not have to pay it. Members of a religious community may formally cease to be considered members by making a declaration to state (not religious) authorities, ending liability to pay church taxes. Some religious communities refuse religious marriages and funerals to members who leave.

The money flow of state and churches is distinct at all levels of the procedures. Income on which church tax is paid is not subject to state income tax (as are voluntary contributions to the Church, for charity or other privileged purposes), so that in effect the state subsidises the church to some extent. The cost to the state of collecting church tax is reimbursed by the church.

The church tax is historically rooted in the pre-Christian Germanic custom whereby the chief of the tribe was directly responsible for the maintenance of priests and religious groups. During the Christianization of Western Europe, this custom was adopted by the Catholic and Arian churches in the concept of "Eigenkirchen" (churches owned by the landlord), which stood in strong contrast to the central church organization of the Catholic Church. Despite the resulting medieval conflict between emperor and pope, the concept of church maintenance by the ruler remained the accepted custom in most Western European countries. In Reformation times the local princes in Germany became officially heads of the church in Protestant areas, and were legally responsible for the maintenance of churches. Not until the 19th century were the finances of churches and state regulated to a point where the churches became financially independent. At this point, the church tax was introduced to replace the state benefits the churches had obtained previously.

The church tax was reaffirmed in Article 13 of the Concordat between Nazi Germany and the Vatican, which guaranteed the right of the Church to levy taxes. Taxpayers, whether Catholic, Protestant or members of other tax-collecting communities, pay an amount equal to 8% in Bavaria and Baden-Württemberg, and 9% in the rest of the country, of their income tax to the church or religious community to which they belong. For example, a person earning €50,000 may pay income tax at 20% (€10,000); the church tax is an additional 8% (or 9%) of that sum (€800 or €900). The paid church tax is deductable in year of paying and reduces the taxable income.

Since 2015, private companies have to take part at the "church tax deduction procedure" ("Kirchensteuerabzugsverfahren"). This should ensure, that also shareholder of private companies pay church taxes on dividends. This regulation was introduced because capital gains in Germany can be taxed at a flat rate since 2009 and therefore do not have to be declared in the income tax return. There was therefore an enforcement deficit.

In 2017, Germany's Catholic church recorded approximately €6 billion tax take, split across its 27 different dioceses or church districts, despite a massive dip in attendance (according to the newspaper Handelsblatt, church attendance had dropped by more than 2.2 million since the start of the millennium). Fifty years before Catholic church attendance exceeded 11 million, but had dropped to 2.5 million. The German Church also has a total fortune of at least €20 billion. The three highest-income dioceses are Paderborn, at €3.5 billion, Munich at €2.8 billion, and Cologne at €2.6 billion.

People moving to Germany must declare their religious affiliation. The state-administered church tax is very successful at compelling tax payment, but many residents can avoid paying it, for example by not being a practising member of a faith. This has led to many people declaring they have abandoned the religion of their birth; it is not known what proportion do this only to avoid the tax.

Iceland

Taxpayers in Iceland who belong to an officially registered religious group or secular humanist organization must pay a congregation tax (Icelandic: sóknargjald, plural sóknargjöld) which is deducted from income taxes and goes to their organization. The sóknargjald of those who did not belong to any recognized religious organization formerly went to the University of Iceland. This was changed in 2009; people not belonging to a registered religious group or secular humanist organization must pay the same amount in tax, which is treated as income tax rather than paid to a church. In 2015, the monthly sóknargjald amounted to 824 krónur, about $US6. In March 2021, Judaism was added to Iceland’s list of state-recognised religious groups.

The Church of Iceland receives governmental support beyond the congregation taxes paid by its members.

Italy

Main article: Eight per thousand See also: Public funding of the Catholic Church in Italy

Taxpayers in Italy pay a mandatory eight per thousand tax, and have the option to choose to whom they will assign the funds. This tax amounts to 0.8% of the total income tax (IRPEF) and every taxpayer can choose the recipient of the contribution on their tax form. Regardless of whether the taxpayer expresses a preference or not, the 0.8% is already included in their tax levy.

Currently the choices are:

If the choice is not expressly declared on the tax form, the tax is distributed according to the percentages of the taxpayers who have declared their choice of beneficiary. While it was intended that the state should use its own share of the 0.8% tax for social or cultural purposes, in practice it has employed it for general purposes including its military mission in Iraq in 2004 and the upgrading of prison infrastructure in 2011.

Spain

The Spanish tax declaration form has a checkbox that allows the taxpayer to allocate 0.7% of their taxes to support the Catholic Church. This checkbox does not influence the total taxes paid; leaving the checkbox blank allocates the same money for general purposes.

Sweden

The members of Church of Sweden pay church fee, which varies between municipalities, but can be as much as 2%. Church and state are separated as of 2000; however, the burial tax (begravningsavgift) is paid by everyone regardless of membership.

In a recent development, the Swedish government has agreed to continue collecting from individual taxpayers the annual payment that has always gone to the church. But now the fee will be an optional checkoff box on the tax return. The government will allocate the money collected to Catholic, Muslim, Jewish and other faiths as well as the Lutherans, with each taxpayer directing where his or her taxes should go.

Switzerland

There is no official state church in Switzerland. However, except Geneva and Neuchâtel, each canton (state) financially supports at least one of the three traditional denominations – Catholic, Old Catholic (in Switzerland Christian Catholic Church of Switzerland), or Evangelical Reformed – with funds collected through taxation. Each canton church tax may formally have to leave the church. In some cantons private companies are unable to avoid payment of the church tax.

In Geneva and Neuchâtel there is no church tax; each taxpayer is free to make a voluntary tax deductible contribution or gift to his church, either directly to the beneficiary or using the canton (state) tax system.

Countries that have ended church taxes

England

There has long been no church tax in United Kingdom. Tithing was obligatory in England centuries ago.

France

France abolished the church tax in 1789.

Mexico

Mexico abolished the church tax in 1833.

United States

See also: Johnson Amendment

The English colonies which later became the United States had tax provisions to support religion, but the Constitution of the United States explicitly separates church and state, and no church tax is levied from citizens. Churches are generally exempt from paying taxes. The United States Supreme Court has held that tax exemption for churches is constitutional under the Establishment Clause and that churches and religious organizations may be subject to a general sales and use tax; however, the Court has not addressed whether government may enact a specific "church tax". The Establishment Clause of the US Constitution prohibits the US federal government and (through incorporation doctrine) the 50 state governments from establishing a state religion or favoring one religion over another.

Prior to American independence, most of the original colonies supported religious activities with taxes, with each colony often choosing a single church as their official religion. These official churches enjoyed privileges not granted to other religious groups. Massachusetts and Connecticut supported the Congregational church through tax. In colonial South Carolina, the Anglican Church benefited from church taxes. Other colonies would more generally support religion by requiring taxes that would partially fund religious institutions - taxpayers could direct payments to the Protestant denomination of their choosing. Only the colonies of Delaware, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island did not require a tax to support religion. During and after the American Revolution, religious minorities, such as the Methodists and the Baptists, argued that taxes to support religion violated freedoms won from the British. Defenders of the practice argued that government needed to fund religious institutions because public virtue depended on these institutions which could not survive purely on private support.

See also

References

  1. "Should Churches (Including Mosques, Synagogues, etc.) Remain Tax-Exempt?". Britannica ProCon. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved August 5, 2020.
  2. McClenaghan, Maeve (29 November 2022). "'Exposed to horrendous things': young people in UK speak out against evangelical church". The Guardian.
  3. "Austria's perilous journey". Thetablet.co.uk. Archived from the original on 2009-05-02. Retrieved 2013-09-03.
  4. ""Kommuneskatteprocenter 1977-2019 i regneark". Home page of Danish Ministry of Taxation, published 6 November 2017, accessed 19 January 2019". Archived from the original on 19 January 2019. Retrieved 19 January 2019.
  5. ""Skatteberegning - hovedtrækkene i personbeskatningen 2018". Home page of Danish Ministry of Taxation, published 17 November 2017, accessed 19 January 2019". Archived from the original on 19 January 2019. Retrieved 19 January 2019.
  6. "Nationalregnskab og offentlige finanser ESA 2010 - Hovedrevison 2014. Report published by Statistics Denmark in September 2014. Quotation from page 52 (in English summary)". Archived from the original on 2019-01-19. Retrieved 2019-01-19.
  7. "Folkekirken i et samfundsøkonomisk perspektiv" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-07-06. Retrieved 2016-06-12.
  8. "Eroakirkosta.fi - Kirkollisverotus kiristynyt 2010-luvulla". 19 December 2015. Archived from the original on 2016-07-31. Retrieved 2016-07-24.
  9. "Einnahmen durch die Kirchensteuer in Deutschland bis 2022".
  10. ^ "German Catholics lose church rights for unpaid tax". BBC News. 2012-09-24. Retrieved 2021-06-07.
  11. "Germany | Hitler's concordat (1933)". Concordat Watch. Archived from the original on 2017-09-18. Retrieved 2019-09-06.
  12. "The politics of appointments to protestant theological faculties in Germany: the case of professor Erich Geldbach". Accessmylibrary.com. Archived from the original on 2010-09-28. Retrieved 2013-09-03.
  13. "Kirchensteuerabzugsverfahren in der Praxis: Leitfaden für GMBH-Geschäftsführer - TAXURA".
  14. ^ Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (2014). "International Religious Freedom Report for 2014: Iceland". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 2015-12-07.
  15. ^ "Kirkjumál og skráð trúfélög og lífsskoðunarfélög" (in Icelandic). Ministry of the Interior (Innanríkisráðuneytið). Archived from the original on 2016-03-23. Retrieved 2015-12-07.
  16. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights and Labor (2004). "International Religious Freedom Report for 2004: Iceland". U.S. Department of State. Retrieved 2015-12-07.
  17. "Frumvarp til laga um ráðstafanir í ríkisfjármálum" (in Icelandic). Alþingi. 2009. Archived from the original on 2015-12-08. Retrieved 2015-12-07.
  18. Iceland adds Judaism to list of state-recognised religions
  19. "In Iraq l'8 per mille destinato all'arte" Archived 2015-05-10 at the Wayback Machine - Corriere della Sera 10 November 2006
  20. Servizio Studi - Dipartimento bilancio (A) (2008-09-22). "Camera dei deputati Dossier BI0026". Documenti.camera.it. Archived from the original on 2015-04-25. Retrieved 2013-09-03.
  21. Carlo Alberto Bucci (2011-12-29). "Carlo Alberto Bucci, "I beni artistici restano a secco i 57 milioni dell'8 per mille vanno all'emergenza carceri" in La Repubblica, 29 December 2011. Retrieved 3 May 2012" (in Italian). Ricerca.repubblica.it. Archived from the original on 14 January 2012. Retrieved 2013-09-03.
  22. "¿Qué hace Hacienda con tu dinero si no marcas la casilla solidaria ni la Iglesia en la declaración de la renta?". El Periódico (in Spanish). 2022-06-23. Retrieved 2022-07-31.
  23. "Die Kirchensteuern". Swiss national tax office (in German). Archived from the original on 24 September 2015. Retrieved 30 November 2014.
  24. "Les Eglises de Neuchâtel encouragent le versement de l'impôt ecclésiastique". www.rts.ch/. 12 September 2019. Retrieved 22 November 2019.
  25. Blackstone, William (1766). Commentaries on the Laws of England vol II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  26. "Suspensión del diezmo eclesiástico".
  27. Internal Revenue Service. "Tax Guide for Churches and Religious Organizations" (PDF). Retrieved July 4, 2021.
  28. "Walz v. Tax Comm'n, 397 U.S. 664 (1970)". Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Retrieved July 4, 2021.
  29. "Jimmy Swaggart Ministries v. California Bd. of Equalization, 493 U.S. 378 (1990)". Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Retrieved July 4, 2021.
  30. "Tax Exemptions of Religious Property". Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Retrieved July 4, 2021.
  31. "Incorporation Doctrine". Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Archived from the original on July 3, 2018. Retrieved July 3, 2018.
  32. "Establishment Clause". Legal Information Institute. Cornell Law School. Retrieved July 4, 2021.
  33. ^ "Public Funding of Religious Activity in 18th-Century America". www.pewforum.org. May 14, 2009. Retrieved October 25, 2020.
  34. Bremer, Francis J. (1995). The Puritan Experiment: New England Society from Bradford to Edwards (Revised ed.). University Press of New England. p. 226. ISBN 9780874517286.
  35. Bolton, S. Charles (1982). Southern Anglicanism: The Church of England in Colonial South Carolina. Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press. pp. 24–26. ISBN 9780313230905.
Categories: