Revision as of 18:26, 13 November 2021 editGeysirhead (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users19,885 editsm removed Category:Hazards using HotCat redundant← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:18, 15 November 2024 edit undoRobert John (talk | contribs)25 editsm →Notable incidents | ||
(44 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ |
{{Short description|Rapid combustion of fine particles suspended in the air}} | ||
]]] | ]]] | ||
A '''dust explosion''' is the rapid ] of fine particles suspended in the ] within an enclosed location. Dust explosions can occur where any dispersed powdered ] is present in high-enough concentrations in the atmosphere or other ] gaseous medium, such as pure ]. In cases when fuel plays the role of a combustible material, the explosion is known as a '''fuel-air explosion.''' | A '''dust explosion''' is the rapid ] of ] suspended in the ] within an enclosed location. Dust explosions can occur where any dispersed powdered ] is present in high-enough concentrations in the atmosphere or other ] gaseous medium, such as pure ]. In cases when fuel plays the role of a combustible material, the explosion is known as a '''fuel-air explosion.''' | ||
Dust explosions are a frequent hazard in ]s, ]s, and other industrial environments. They are also commonly used by ]s artists, ], and ], given their spectacular appearance and ability to be safely contained under certain carefully controlled conditions. | Dust explosions are a frequent hazard in ]s, ]s and ]s, and other industrial environments. They are also commonly used by ]s artists, ], and ], given their spectacular appearance and ability to be safely contained under certain carefully controlled conditions. | ||
] |
] exploit this principle by rapidly saturating an area with an easily combustible material and then igniting it to produce explosive force. These weapons are the most powerful non-nuclear weapons in existence.<ref>{{Cite news |url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2007/sep/12/russia.lukeharding|title=Russia unveils the 'father of all bombs' |last=Harding |first=Luke |date=2007-09-11 |work=The Guardian |access-date=2019-01-19 |language=en-GB |issn=0261-3077}}</ref> | ||
== Terminology == | == Terminology == | ||
If rapid combustion occurs in a ], enormous ]s can build up, causing major structural damage and flying debris. The sudden release of energy from a "]" can produce a ], either in open air or in a confined space. If the spread of flame is at ] speed, the phenomenon is sometimes called a "]", although looser usage calls both phenomena "]". | If rapid combustion occurs in a ], enormous ]s can build up, causing major structural damage and flying debris. The sudden release of energy from a "]" can produce a ], either in open air or in a confined space. If the spread of flame is at ] speed, the phenomenon is sometimes called a "]", although looser usage calls both phenomena "]".{{CN|date=October 2024}} | ||
Dust explosions may be classified as being either "primary" or "secondary" in nature. Primary dust explosions may occur inside process equipment or similar enclosures, and are generally controlled by ] through purpose-built ducting to the external atmosphere. Secondary dust explosions are the result of dust accumulation inside a building being disturbed and ignited by the primary explosion, resulting in a much more dangerous uncontrolled explosion that can affect the entire structure. Historically, fatalities from dust explosions have largely been the result of secondary dust explosions.<ref name=ONE>Eckhoff, Rolf K. (1997). Dust Explosions in the Process Industries (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. {{ISBN|0-7506-3270-4}}.</ref> | Dust explosions may be classified as being either "primary" or "secondary" in nature. Primary dust explosions may occur inside process equipment or similar enclosures, and are generally controlled by ] through purpose-built ducting to the external atmosphere. Secondary dust explosions are the result of dust accumulation inside a building being disturbed and ignited by the primary explosion, resulting in a much more dangerous uncontrolled explosion that can affect the entire structure. Historically, fatalities from dust explosions have largely been the result of secondary dust explosions.<ref name=ONE>Eckhoff, Rolf K. (1997). Dust Explosions in the Process Industries (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. {{ISBN|0-7506-3270-4}}.</ref> | ||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
== Conditions required == | == Conditions required == | ||
] | ] | ||
There are five necessary conditions for a dust explosion:<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/data_General_Facts/OSHAcombustibledust.pdf|title=OSHA Fact Sheet: Hazard Alert: Combustible Dust Explosions|website=osha.gov|access-date=2018-01-23 |
There are five necessary conditions for a dust explosion:<ref>{{Cite web |url=https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/data_General_Facts/OSHAcombustibledust.pdf |title=OSHA Fact Sheet: Hazard Alert: Combustible Dust Explosions |website=osha.gov |access-date=2018-01-23 |archive-date=2020-11-01 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201101022138/https://www.osha.gov/OshDoc/data_General_Facts/OSHAcombustibledust.pdf |url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | # A combustible ] | ||
⚫ | # The dust is dispersed in the air within certain ]s | ||
⚫ | |||
# There is an ] (typically atmospheric oxygen) | |||
⚫ | |||
# There is an ignition source | |||
⚫ | # The area is confined{{snd}}a building can be an enclosure | ||
* There is an ignition source | |||
⚫ | |||
=== Sources of dust === | === Sources of dust === | ||
] rendering of the ]]] | ] rendering of the ]]] | ||
] in ] 1921. These cable drums were blown 50 feet (15 m) from their foundations following a ] explosion.]] | ] in ] 1921. These cable drums were blown 50 feet (15 m) from their foundations following a ] explosion.]] | ||
] in ], US]] | ] in ], US]] | ||
Many common materials which are known to burn can generate a dust explosion, such as ] and ]. In addition, many otherwise mundane organic materials can also be dispersed into a dangerous dust cloud, such as ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. ]s (such as ], ], and ]) can form explosive suspensions in air, if finely divided. | Many common materials which are known to burn can generate a dust explosion, such as ] and ]. In addition, many otherwise mundane organic materials can also be dispersed into a dangerous dust cloud, such as ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. ]s (such as ], ], and ]) can form explosive suspensions in air, if finely divided. | ||
A ] destroyed a mill in Minnesota on May 2, 1878, killing 14 workers at the ] and another four in adjacent buildings.<ref>{{cite encyclopedia |url=http://www.mnopedia.org/event/1878-washburn-mill-explosion |title=The 1878 Washburn A Mill Explosion|first=Iric |last=Nathanson |access-date=2014-04-08 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140408222412/http://www.mnopedia.org/event/1878-washburn-mill-explosion |archive-date=2014-04-08 }}</ref> A similar problem occurs in ]s and other places dedicated to ]. | |||
Since the advent of industrial production–scale ]–based ] (AM) in the 2010s, there is growing need for more information and experience with preventing dust explosions and fires from the traces of excess metal powder sometimes left over after laser ] or other fusion methods.<ref name="Simpson_2017-08-17">{{Citation |last=Simpson |first=Timothy W. |date=2017-08-17 |title=Will My AM Part Explode? Not if you're careful. Parts built from metallic powder require extra precautions |journal=] |url=https://www.mmsonline.com/columns/will-my-am-part-explode |postscript=.}}</ref> For example, in ] operations downstream of the AM build, excess powder liberated from porosities in the support structures can be exposed to sparks from the cutting interface.<ref name="Simpson_2017-08-17"/> Efforts are underway not only to build this knowledgebase within the industry but also to share it with local fire departments, who do periodic fire-safety inspections of businesses in their districts and who can expect to answer alarms at shops or plants where AM is now part of the production mix.<ref name="Simpson_2017-08-17"/> | Since the advent of industrial production–scale ]–based ] (AM) in the 2010s, there is growing need for more information and experience with preventing dust explosions and ] from the traces of excess ] sometimes left over after laser ] or other fusion methods.<ref name="Simpson_2017-08-17">{{Citation |last=Simpson |first=Timothy W. |date=2017-08-17 |title=Will My AM Part Explode? Not if you're careful. Parts built from metallic powder require extra precautions |journal=] |url=https://www.mmsonline.com/columns/will-my-am-part-explode |postscript=.}}</ref> For example, in ] operations downstream of the AM build, excess powder liberated from porosities in the support structures can be exposed to sparks from the cutting interface.<ref name="Simpson_2017-08-17"/> Efforts are underway not only to build this knowledgebase within the industry but also to share it with local fire departments, who do periodic fire-safety inspections of businesses in their districts and who can expect to answer alarms at shops or plants where AM is now part of the production mix.<ref name="Simpson_2017-08-17"/> | ||
Although not strictly a dust, paper particles emitted during processing |
Although not strictly a dust, paper ] emitted during processing – especially rolling, unrolling, calendaring/slitting, and sheet-cutting – are also known to pose an explosion hazard. Enclosed paper mill areas subject to such dangers commonly maintain ] to reduce the chance of airborne paper dust explosions. | ||
In ] ], ]<ref name=ONE/> and ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.detonationfilms.com/Fireball_demo.htm|title=Detonation Films |
In ] ], ]<ref name=ONE/> and ]<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.detonationfilms.com/Fireball_demo.htm|title=Detonation Films – Why Coffee Creamer?|access-date=March 20, 2011|archive-date=November 12, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201112014857/https://www.detonationfilms.com/Fireball_demo.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> are two common means of producing safe, controlled fire effects. | ||
To support rapid combustion, the dust must consist of very small particles with a high ], thereby making the collective or combined surface area of all the particles very large in comparison to a dust of larger particles. ] is defined as ] with particles less than about 500 micrometres in diameter, but finer dust will present a much greater hazard than coarse particles by virtue of the larger total surface area of all the particles. | To support rapid combustion, the dust must consist of very small particles with a high ], thereby making the collective or combined surface area of all the particles very large in comparison to a dust of larger particles. ] is defined as ] with particles less than about 500 micrometres in diameter, but ] dust will present a much greater hazard than coarse particles by virtue of the larger total surface area of all the particles. | ||
=== Concentration === | === Concentration === | ||
Below a certain value, the ] (LEL), there is insufficient dust to support the combustion at the rate required for an explosion.<ref name=bartec/> A combustible concentration at or below 25% of the LEL is considered safe.<ref>NFPA 69 8.3.1</ref> Similarly, if the ] increases above the ] (UEL), there is insufficient oxidant to permit combustion to continue at the necessary rate. | Below a certain value, the ] (LEL), there is insufficient dust to support the combustion at the rate required for an explosion.<ref name=bartec/> A combustible concentration at or below 25% of the LEL is considered safe.<ref>NFPA 69 8.3.1</ref> Similarly, if the ] increases above the ] (UEL), there is insufficient oxidant to permit combustion to continue at the necessary rate. | ||
Determining the minimum explosive concentration or maximum explosive concentration of dusts in air is difficult, and consulting different sources can lead to quite different results. Typical explosive ranges in air are from few dozens grams/m<sup>3</sup> for the minimum limit, to few kg/m<sup>3</sup> for the maximum limit. For example, the LEL for sawdust has been determined to be between 40 and 50 grams/m<sup>3</sup>.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://powderprocess.net/Safety/Dust_Explosion_Concentration.html|title=Dust explosion concentration |
Determining the minimum explosive concentration or maximum explosive concentration of dusts in air is difficult, and consulting different sources can lead to quite different results. Typical explosive ranges in air are from few dozens grams/m<sup>3</sup> for the minimum limit, to few kg/m<sup>3</sup> for the maximum limit. For example, the LEL for sawdust has been determined to be between 40 and 50 grams/m<sup>3</sup>.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://powderprocess.net/Safety/Dust_Explosion_Concentration.html|title=Dust explosion concentration – Physical meaning and use in risk assessment of powder minimum explosive concentration (MEC)|website=PowderProcess.net}}</ref> It depends on many factors including the type of material used. | ||
=== Oxidant === | === Oxidant === | ||
Line 58: | Line 57: | ||
== Mechanism == | == Mechanism == | ||
] | |||
Dusts have a very large surface area compared to their mass. Since burning can only occur at the surface of a solid or liquid, where it can react with oxygen, this causes dusts to be much more flammable than bulk materials. For example, a {{convert|1|kg}} sphere of a combustible material with a density of 1 g/cm<sup>3</sup> would be about {{convert|12.4|cm|in}} in diameter, and have a surface area of {{convert|0.048|m2}}. However, if it were broken up into spherical dust particles 50 ] in diameter (about the size of ] particles) it would have a surface area of {{convert|120|m2}}. This greatly-increased surface area allows the material to burn much faster, and the extremely small mass of each particle allows them to catch on fire with much less energy than the bulk material, as there is no heat loss to conduction within the material. | Dusts have a very large surface area compared to their mass. Since burning can only occur at the surface of a solid or liquid, where it can react with oxygen, this causes dusts to be much more flammable than bulk materials. For example, a {{convert|1|kg}} sphere of a combustible material with a density of 1 g/cm<sup>3</sup> would be about {{convert|12.4|cm|in}} in diameter, and have a surface area of {{convert|0.048|m2}}. However, if it were broken up into spherical dust particles 50 ] in diameter (about the size of ] particles) it would have a surface area of {{convert|120|m2}}. This greatly-increased surface area allows the material to burn much faster, and the extremely small mass of each particle allows them to catch on fire with much less energy than the bulk material, as there is no heat loss to conduction within the material. | ||
When this mixture of fuel and air is ignited, especially in a confined space such as a warehouse or silo, a significant increase in pressure is created, often more than sufficient to demolish the structure. Even materials that are traditionally thought of as nonflammable (such as aluminum), or slow burning (such as wood), can produce a powerful explosion when finely divided, and can be ignited by even a small spark. | When this mixture of fuel and air is ignited, especially in a confined space such as a warehouse or silo, a significant increase in pressure is created, often more than sufficient to demolish the structure. Even materials that are traditionally thought of as nonflammable (such as aluminum), or slow burning (such as wood), can produce a powerful explosion when finely divided, and can be ignited by even a small spark. | ||
Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
==Effects== | ==Effects== | ||
A dust explosion can cause major damage to structures, equipment, and personnel from violent overpressure or shockwave effects. Flying objects and debris can cause further damage. Intense ] from a fireball can ignite the surroundings, or cause severe ]s in unprotected persons. In a tightly enclosed space, the sudden depletion of oxygen can cause ]. Where the dust is carbon based (such as in a coal mine), incomplete combustion may cause large amounts of ] (the miners' ]) to be created. This can cause more deaths than the original explosion as well as hindering rescue attempts.<ref>{{Citation | last1 = Murray | first1=Charles Edward Robertson | last2=Wilberforce | first2=Daniel | last3=Ritchie | first3=David | date=1903 | title=Mount Kembla Colliery Disaster 31 July 1902 – Report of the Royal Commission, together with minutes of evidence and exhibits | journal=Historical and Cultural Collections |
A dust explosion can cause major damage to structures, equipment, and personnel from violent overpressure or shockwave effects. Flying objects and debris can cause further damage. Intense ] from a fireball can ignite the surroundings, or cause severe ]s in unprotected persons. In a tightly enclosed space, the sudden depletion of oxygen can cause ]. Where the dust is carbon based (such as in a coal mine), incomplete combustion may cause large amounts of ] (the miners' ]) to be created. This can cause more deaths than the original explosion as well as hindering rescue attempts.<ref>{{Citation | last1 = Murray | first1=Charles Edward Robertson | last2=Wilberforce | first2=Daniel | last3=Ritchie | first3=David | date=1903 | title=Mount Kembla Colliery Disaster 31 July 1902 – Report of the Royal Commission, together with minutes of evidence and exhibits | journal=Historical and Cultural Collections – Publications | publisher=New South Wales Legislative Assembly | url=https://ro.uow.edu.au/hcp/2/ | access-date=19 May 2019|page=xxxvi}}</ref><ref>{{citation | last = Roberts | first = H C W | title = Report on the causes of, and circumstances attending, the explosion which occurred at Easington Colliery, County Durham, on the 29th May, 1951. | date = September 1952 | publisher = Her Majesty's Stationery Office | location = London | series = Cmd 8646 | hdl = 1842/5365 | pages = 9, 39–40}}</ref> | ||
== Protection and mitigation == | == Protection and mitigation == | ||
Line 113: | Line 113: | ||
| scope="row" | ] || {{dts|1872-07-09}} || ], ] || {{flagcountry|UK}} || ] dust || 18 || 16 || Destroyed the mill building and damaged surrounding buildings, and started a fire that killed others. The investigation into the explosion was published across Europe and the Americas. | | scope="row" | ] || {{dts|1872-07-09}} || ], ] || {{flagcountry|UK}} || ] dust || 18 || 16 || Destroyed the mill building and damaged surrounding buildings, and started a fire that killed others. The investigation into the explosion was published across Europe and the Americas. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| scope="row" | ] |
| scope="row" | ]|| {{dts|1878-05-02}} || ] || {{flagcountry|USA|variant=1877}} || ] dust || 18 || || Destroyed the largest grain mill in the world and leveled five other mills, effectively reducing the milling capacity of Minneapolis by one-third to one-half. Prompted mills throughout the country to install better ventilation systems to prevent dust build-up. | ||
|- | |||
|Husted Mill and Elevator Disaster | |||
|June 24, 1913 | |||
|] | |||
|{{Flagicon|United States of America|variant=1912}}] | |||
|] dust | |||
|33 | |||
|80 | |||
|This workday afternoon explosion destroyed a grain elevator and mill complex. The engineer of a passing railroad switch engine was blown from the cab and died. Windows of a passing ] passenger train were broken, but no passengers were injured.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Buffalo, NY Grain Elevator Explosion, June 1913 {{!}} GenDisasters ... Genealogy in Tragedy, Disasters, Fires, Floods Page 1 |url=http://www.gendisasters.com/new-york/17188/buffalo-ny-grain-elevator-explosion-june-1913?page=0,0 |access-date=2022-02-28 |website=www.gendisasters.com}}</ref><ref>{{Cite book |last=Henry H. |first=Baxter |url=http://bechsed.nylearns.org/pdf/Buffalos_Grain_Elevators.pdf |title=Grain Elevators |publisher=Buffalo and Erie County Historical Society |year=1980 |location=Buffalo, NY |pages=14}}</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| scope="row" | Milwaukee Works explosion | | scope="row" | Milwaukee Works explosion | ||
Line 127: | Line 136: | ||
|| {{dts|1919-05-22}} | || {{dts|1919-05-22}} | ||
|| ] | || ] | ||
|| {{flagcountry|USA}} | || {{flagcountry|USA|variant=1912}} | ||
|| ] | || ] | ||
|| 43 | || 43 | ||
Line 136: | Line 145: | ||
|| {{dts|1919-08-09}} | || {{dts|1919-08-09}} | ||
|| ] | || ] | ||
|| {{flagcountry|Canada}} | || {{flagcountry|Canada|variant=1868}} | ||
|| grain | || grain | ||
|| 10 | || 10 | ||
Line 145: | Line 154: | ||
|| {{dts|1919-09-13}} | || {{dts|1919-09-13}} | ||
|| ] | || ] | ||
|| {{flagcountry|USA}} | || {{flagcountry|USA|variant=1912}} | ||
|| | || | ||
|| 14 | || 14 | ||
Line 153: | Line 162: | ||
| scope="row" | ] || {{dts|1921-09-19}} || ] || {{flagcountry|Australia}} || ] || 75 || || The series of coal dust explosions within a mine rocked the close-knit township and was audible as far as {{convert|30|km}} away. | | scope="row" | ] || {{dts|1921-09-19}} || ] || {{flagcountry|Australia}} || ] || 75 || || The series of coal dust explosions within a mine rocked the close-knit township and was audible as far as {{convert|30|km}} away. | ||
|- | |- | ||
| scope="row" | ] || {{dts|1942-04-26}} || ], ] || {{flagcountry|Manchukuo}} (now |
| scope="row" | ] || {{dts|1942-04-26}} || ], ] || {{flagcountry|Manchukuo}} (now China) || coal dust and gas || 1,549 || || 34% of the miners working that day were killed. This is the world's worst-ever coal-mining accident. | ||
|- | |||
|Pillsbury Explosion and Fire | |||
|January 2, 1972 | |||
|] | |||
|{{Flagicon|United States of America}}] | |||
|] | |||
|3 | |||
|8 | |||
|New Year's weekend explosion at what was then the world's biggest flour mill. The blast occurred in a series of 500-foot-long, 10-story-tall concrete-and-steel bulk flour storage bins. Repairs took a year to complete.<ref>{{Cite news |date=1972-01-03 |title=1 Dead, 2 Lost as Blast in Buffalo Rips World's Biggest Flour Mill |language=en-US |work=The New York Times |url=https://www.nytimes.com/1972/01/03/archives/1-dead-2-lost-as-blast-in-buffalo-rips-worlds-biggest-flour-mill.html |access-date=2022-02-28 |issn=0362-4331}}</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| scope="row" |]||{{dts|1977-12-22}} || ] || {{flagcountry|USA}} || grain dust || 36 || 13 || <ref name=TheDay>{{cite news| journal=The Day |title=Explosion suits settled |date=24 April 1980 |page=26 |place=New London, Connecticut}}</ref> | | scope="row" |]||{{dts|1977-12-22}} || ] || {{flagcountry|USA}} || grain dust || 36 || 13 || <ref name=TheDay>{{cite news| journal=The Day |title=Explosion suits settled |date=24 April 1980 |page=26 |place=New London, Connecticut}}</ref> | ||
Line 163: | Line 181: | ||
| scope="row" | Metz malt factory explosion || {{dts|1982-10-18}} || ] || {{flagcountry|France}} || barley dust || 12 || 1 || <ref>{{in lang|fr}}</ref> | | scope="row" | Metz malt factory explosion || {{dts|1982-10-18}} || ] || {{flagcountry|France}} || barley dust || 12 || 1 || <ref>{{in lang|fr}}</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| scope="row" | |
| scope="row" | Ingeniero White Silo Nº 5 explosion || {{dts|1985-03-13}} || ] || {{flagcountry|Argentina}} || grain dust || 22 || || <ref>{{cite news |title=En un emotivo acto presentaron el documental "Elevador 5 – 35 años" |url=https://www.lanueva.com/nota/2020-3-13-15-11-0-en-un-emotivo-acto-presentaron-el-documental-silo-5-35-anos |date=13 March 2020 |access-date=17 November 2021 |journal=La Nueva |lang=es}}</ref> | ||
|- | |||
| scope="row" | Harbin textile factory explosion || {{dts|1987-03-17}} || ] || {{flagcountry|China}} || ] dust || 58 || 177 || <ref name=LATimesHarbin>{{cite news |title=47 Die, 179 Injured in Blast at Linen Mill in Northeast China |url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1987-03-17-mn-12499-story.html |date=March 17, 1987 |access-date=2015-07-02 |journal=Los Angeles Times }}</ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| scope="row" | ] accident || {{dts|1992-06-9}} || ] || {{flagcountry|Ukraine}} || coal dust and ] || 63 || 37 || <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fireman.club/statyi-polzovateley/vzryv-na-shaxte-suxodolskaya-vostochnaya/|title = Взрыв на шахте «Суходольская-Восточная»|date = 25 March 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://tsn.ua/ru/ukrayina/samye-masshtabnye-avarii-na-shahtah-za-gody-nezavisimoy-ukrainy-815354.html|title=Самые масштабные аварии на шахтах за годы независимой Украины|date=2 March 2017}}</ref> | | scope="row" | ] accident || {{dts|1992-06-9}} || ] || {{flagcountry|Ukraine}} || coal dust and ] || 63 || 37 || <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://fireman.club/statyi-polzovateley/vzryv-na-shaxte-suxodolskaya-vostochnaya/|title = Взрыв на шахте «Суходольская-Восточная»|date = 25 March 2016}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://tsn.ua/ru/ukrayina/samye-masshtabnye-avarii-na-shahtah-za-gody-nezavisimoy-ukrainy-815354.html|title=Самые масштабные аварии на шахтах за годы независимой Украины|date=2 March 2017}}</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
| scope="row" | Blaye grain explosion || {{dts|1997-08}} || ] || {{flagcountry|France}} || grain dust || 11 || 1 || Explosion in a grain storage facility at the Société d’Exploitation Maritime Blayaise killed 11 people in nearby offices and injured one.<ref name=HazardEx/> | | scope="row" | Blaye grain explosion || {{dts|1997-08}} || ] || {{flagcountry|France}} || grain dust || 11 || 1 || Explosion in a grain storage facility at the Société d’Exploitation Maritime Blayaise killed 11 people in nearby offices and injured one.<ref name=HazardEx/> | ||
|- | |||
| scope="row" | Debruce elevator explosion || {{dts|1998-06}} || ] || {{flagcountry|USA}} || grain dust || 7 || 10 || Multiple explosions occurred in what was then the world's largest grain elevator. Dust collection systems were not properly maintained.<ref></ref> | |||
|- | |- | ||
| scope="row" | ] || {{dts|2003-01-29}} || ] || {{flagcountry|USA}} || ] dust || 6 || 38 || | | scope="row" | ] || {{dts|2003-01-29}} || ] || {{flagcountry|USA}} || ] dust || 6 || 38 || | ||
Line 183: | Line 205: | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
* ] | * ] | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
Line 200: | Line 222: | ||
* | * | ||
'''Protecting process plant |
'''Protecting process plant, grain handling facilities, etc. from the risk of dust hazard explosions:''' | ||
* | * | ||
* | * | ||
* http://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/books/hsg103.htm |
* | ||
* | |||
{{Fire protection}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | {{Authority control}} | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
⚫ | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
⚫ | ] |
Latest revision as of 12:18, 15 November 2024
Rapid combustion of fine particles suspended in the airA dust explosion is the rapid combustion of fine particles suspended in the air within an enclosed location. Dust explosions can occur where any dispersed powdered combustible material is present in high-enough concentrations in the atmosphere or other oxidizing gaseous medium, such as pure oxygen. In cases when fuel plays the role of a combustible material, the explosion is known as a fuel-air explosion.
Dust explosions are a frequent hazard in coal mines, grain elevators and silos, and other industrial environments. They are also commonly used by special effects artists, filmmakers, and pyrotechnicians, given their spectacular appearance and ability to be safely contained under certain carefully controlled conditions.
Thermobaric weapons exploit this principle by rapidly saturating an area with an easily combustible material and then igniting it to produce explosive force. These weapons are the most powerful non-nuclear weapons in existence.
Terminology
If rapid combustion occurs in a confined space, enormous overpressures can build up, causing major structural damage and flying debris. The sudden release of energy from a "detonation" can produce a shockwave, either in open air or in a confined space. If the spread of flame is at subsonic speed, the phenomenon is sometimes called a "deflagration", although looser usage calls both phenomena "explosions".
Dust explosions may be classified as being either "primary" or "secondary" in nature. Primary dust explosions may occur inside process equipment or similar enclosures, and are generally controlled by pressure relief through purpose-built ducting to the external atmosphere. Secondary dust explosions are the result of dust accumulation inside a building being disturbed and ignited by the primary explosion, resulting in a much more dangerous uncontrolled explosion that can affect the entire structure. Historically, fatalities from dust explosions have largely been the result of secondary dust explosions.
Conditions required
There are five necessary conditions for a dust explosion:
- A combustible dust
- The dust is dispersed in the air within certain flammability limits
- There is an oxidant (typically atmospheric oxygen)
- There is an ignition source
- The area is confined – a building can be an enclosure
Sources of dust
Many common materials which are known to burn can generate a dust explosion, such as coal dust and sawdust. In addition, many otherwise mundane organic materials can also be dispersed into a dangerous dust cloud, such as grain, flour, starch, sugar, powdered milk, cocoa, coffee, and pollen. Powdered metals (such as aluminum, magnesium, and titanium) can form explosive suspensions in air, if finely divided.
A gigantic explosion of flour dust destroyed a mill in Minnesota on May 2, 1878, killing 14 workers at the Washburn A Mill and another four in adjacent buildings. A similar problem occurs in sawmills and other places dedicated to woodworking.
Since the advent of industrial production–scale metal powder–based additive manufacturing (AM) in the 2010s, there is growing need for more information and experience with preventing dust explosions and fires from the traces of excess metal powder sometimes left over after laser sintering or other fusion methods. For example, in machining operations downstream of the AM build, excess powder liberated from porosities in the support structures can be exposed to sparks from the cutting interface. Efforts are underway not only to build this knowledgebase within the industry but also to share it with local fire departments, who do periodic fire-safety inspections of businesses in their districts and who can expect to answer alarms at shops or plants where AM is now part of the production mix.
Although not strictly a dust, paper particles emitted during processing – especially rolling, unrolling, calendaring/slitting, and sheet-cutting – are also known to pose an explosion hazard. Enclosed paper mill areas subject to such dangers commonly maintain very high air humidities to reduce the chance of airborne paper dust explosions.
In special effects pyrotechnics, lycopodium powder and non-dairy creamer are two common means of producing safe, controlled fire effects.
To support rapid combustion, the dust must consist of very small particles with a high surface area to volume ratio, thereby making the collective or combined surface area of all the particles very large in comparison to a dust of larger particles. Dust is defined as powders with particles less than about 500 micrometres in diameter, but finer dust will present a much greater hazard than coarse particles by virtue of the larger total surface area of all the particles.
Concentration
Below a certain value, the lower explosive limit (LEL), there is insufficient dust to support the combustion at the rate required for an explosion. A combustible concentration at or below 25% of the LEL is considered safe. Similarly, if the fuel to air ratio increases above the upper explosive limit (UEL), there is insufficient oxidant to permit combustion to continue at the necessary rate.
Determining the minimum explosive concentration or maximum explosive concentration of dusts in air is difficult, and consulting different sources can lead to quite different results. Typical explosive ranges in air are from few dozens grams/m for the minimum limit, to few kg/m for the maximum limit. For example, the LEL for sawdust has been determined to be between 40 and 50 grams/m. It depends on many factors including the type of material used.
Oxidant
Typically, normal atmospheric oxygen can be sufficient to support a dust explosion if the other necessary conditions are also present. High-oxygen or pure oxygen environments are considered to be especially hazardous, as are strong oxidizing gases such as chlorine and fluorine. Also, particulate suspensions of compounds with a high oxidative potential, such as peroxides, chlorates, nitrates, perchlorates, and dichromates, can increase risk of an explosion if combustible materials are also present.
Sources of ignition
There are many sources of ignition, and a naked flame need not be the only one: over one half of the dust explosions in Germany in 2005 were from non-flame sources. Common sources of ignition include:
- electrostatic discharge (e.g. an improperly installed conveyor belt, which can act like a Van de Graaff generator)
- friction
- electrical arcing from machinery or other equipment
- hot surfaces (e.g. overheated bearings)
- fire
- self-ignition
However, it is often difficult to determine the exact source of ignition when investigating after an explosion. When a source cannot be found, ignition will often be attributed to static electricity. Static charges can be generated by external sources, or can be internally generated by friction at the surfaces of particles themselves as they collide or move past one another.
Mechanism
Dusts have a very large surface area compared to their mass. Since burning can only occur at the surface of a solid or liquid, where it can react with oxygen, this causes dusts to be much more flammable than bulk materials. For example, a 1 kilogram (2.2 lb) sphere of a combustible material with a density of 1 g/cm would be about 12.4 centimetres (4.9 in) in diameter, and have a surface area of 0.048 square metres (0.52 sq ft). However, if it were broken up into spherical dust particles 50 μm in diameter (about the size of flour particles) it would have a surface area of 120 square metres (1,300 sq ft). This greatly-increased surface area allows the material to burn much faster, and the extremely small mass of each particle allows them to catch on fire with much less energy than the bulk material, as there is no heat loss to conduction within the material.
When this mixture of fuel and air is ignited, especially in a confined space such as a warehouse or silo, a significant increase in pressure is created, often more than sufficient to demolish the structure. Even materials that are traditionally thought of as nonflammable (such as aluminum), or slow burning (such as wood), can produce a powerful explosion when finely divided, and can be ignited by even a small spark.
- Demonstration of an open-air dust explosion
- Experimental setup
- Finely-ground flour is dispersed
- Cloud of flour is ignited
- Fireball spreads rapidly
- Intense radiant heat has nothing to ignite here
- Fireball and superheated gases rise
- Aftermath of explosion, with unburned flour on the ground
Effects
A dust explosion can cause major damage to structures, equipment, and personnel from violent overpressure or shockwave effects. Flying objects and debris can cause further damage. Intense radiant heat from a fireball can ignite the surroundings, or cause severe skin burns in unprotected persons. In a tightly enclosed space, the sudden depletion of oxygen can cause asphyxiation. Where the dust is carbon based (such as in a coal mine), incomplete combustion may cause large amounts of carbon monoxide (the miners' after-damp) to be created. This can cause more deaths than the original explosion as well as hindering rescue attempts.
Protection and mitigation
Much research has been carried out in Europe and elsewhere to understand how to control these dangers, but dust explosions still occur. The alternatives for making processes and plants safer depend on the industry.
In the coal mining industry, a methane explosion can initiate a coal dust explosion, which can then engulf an entire mine pit. As a precaution, incombustible stone dust may be spread along mine roadways, or stored in trays hanging from the roof, to dilute the coal dust stirred up by a shockwave to the point where it cannot burn. Mines may also be sprayed with water to inhibit ignition.
Some industries exclude oxygen from dust-raising processes, a precaution known as "inerting". Typically this uses nitrogen, carbon dioxide, or argon, which are incombustible gases which can displace oxygen. The same method is also used in large storage tanks where flammable vapors can accumulate. However, use of oxygen-free gases brings a risk of asphyxiation of the workers. Workers who need illumination in enclosed spaces where a dust explosion is a high risk often use lamps designed for underwater divers, as they have no risk of producing an open spark due to their sealed waterproof design.
Good housekeeping practices, such as eliminating build-up of combustible dust deposits that could be disturbed and lead to a secondary explosion, also help mitigate the problem.
Best engineering control measures which can be found in the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Combustible Dust Standards include:
- Wetting
- Oxidant concentration reduction
- Deflagration venting
- Deflagration pressure containment
- Deflagration suppression
- Deflagration venting through a dust retention and flame-arresting device
Notable incidents
Dust clouds are a common source of explosions, causing an estimated 2,000 explosions annually in Europe. The table lists notable incidents worldwide.
Event | Date | Location | Country | Source material | Fatalities | Injuries | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tradeston Flour Mills explosion | July 9, 1872 | Glasgow, Scotland | United Kingdom | grain dust | 18 | 16 | Destroyed the mill building and damaged surrounding buildings, and started a fire that killed others. The investigation into the explosion was published across Europe and the Americas. |
Great Mill Disaster | May 2, 1878 | Minneapolis, Minnesota | United States | grain dust | 18 | Destroyed the largest grain mill in the world and leveled five other mills, effectively reducing the milling capacity of Minneapolis by one-third to one-half. Prompted mills throughout the country to install better ventilation systems to prevent dust build-up. | |
Husted Mill and Elevator Disaster | June 24, 1913 | Buffalo, New York | United States | grain dust | 33 | 80 | This workday afternoon explosion destroyed a grain elevator and mill complex. The engineer of a passing railroad switch engine was blown from the cab and died. Windows of a passing Nickel Plate Road passenger train were broken, but no passengers were injured. |
Milwaukee Works explosion | May 20, 1919 | Milwaukee, Wisconsin | United States | Feed grinding plant | 3 | 4 | The blast was felt for miles around and completely leveled the plant owned by the company. |
Douglas Starch Works explosion | May 22, 1919 | Cedar Rapids, Iowa | United States | corn starch | 43 | 30 | The blast was felt for miles around and completely leveled the plant owned by the company. |
Port Colborne explosion | August 9, 1919 | Port Colborne | Canada | grain | 10 | 16 | Blast also destroyed the steamer Quebec, which was near the grain elevator |
Large terminal grain elevator in Kansas City | September 13, 1919 | Kansas City, Missouri | United States | 14 | 10 | Originated in basement of elevator, during a cleanup period, and travelled up through the elevator shaft | |
Mount Mulligan mine disaster | September 19, 1921 | Mount Mulligan, Queensland | Australia | coal dust | 75 | The series of coal dust explosions within a mine rocked the close-knit township and was audible as far as 30 kilometres (19 mi) away. | |
Benxihu Colliery explosion | April 26, 1942 | Benxi, Liaoning | Manchukuo (now China) | coal dust and gas | 1,549 | 34% of the miners working that day were killed. This is the world's worst-ever coal-mining accident. | |
Pillsbury Explosion and Fire | January 2, 1972 | Buffalo, New York | United States | wheat flour | 3 | 8 | New Year's weekend explosion at what was then the world's biggest flour mill. The blast occurred in a series of 500-foot-long, 10-story-tall concrete-and-steel bulk flour storage bins. Repairs took a year to complete. |
Westwego grain elevator explosion | December 22, 1977 | Westwego, Louisiana | United States | grain dust | 36 | 13 | |
Galveston grain elevator explosion | December 27, 1977 | Galveston, Texas | United States | grain dust | 20 | ||
Bird's Custard factory explosion | November 18, 1981 | Banbury | United Kingdom | corn starch | 9 | ||
Metz malt factory explosion | October 18, 1982 | Metz | France | barley dust | 12 | 1 | |
Ingeniero White Silo Nº 5 explosion | March 13, 1985 | Ingeniero White | Argentina | grain dust | 22 | ||
Harbin textile factory explosion | March 17, 1987 | Harbin | China | flax dust | 58 | 177 | |
Sukhodilska–Skhidna coal mine accident | June 9, 1992 | Sukhodilsk | Ukraine | coal dust and firedamp | 63 | 37 | |
Blaye grain explosion | August 1997 | Blaye | France | grain dust | 11 | 1 | Explosion in a grain storage facility at the Société d’Exploitation Maritime Blayaise killed 11 people in nearby offices and injured one. |
Debruce elevator explosion | June 1998 | Wichita, Kansas | United States | grain dust | 7 | 10 | Multiple explosions occurred in what was then the world's largest grain elevator. Dust collection systems were not properly maintained. |
West Pharmaceutical Services explosion | January 29, 2003 | Kinston, North Carolina | United States | polyethylene dust | 6 | 38 | |
Imperial Sugar explosion | February 7, 2008 | Port Wentworth, Georgia | United States | sugar dust | 14 | 42 | |
2014 Kunshan explosion | August 2, 2014 | Kunshan | China | metal powder | 146 | 114 | |
Formosa Fun Coast explosion | June 27, 2015 | New Taipei | Taiwan | colored starch powder | 15 | 498 | Explosion when Holi-like colored powder was released at an outdoor music and color festival at the Formosa Fun Coast. |
Bosley wood flour mill explosion | July 17, 2015 | Bosley, Cheshire | United Kingdom | wood flour | 4 | 4 |
See also
References
- Harding, Luke (2007-09-11). "Russia unveils the 'father of all bombs'". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-01-19.
- ^ Eckhoff, Rolf K. (1997). Dust Explosions in the Process Industries (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 0-7506-3270-4.
- "OSHA Fact Sheet: Hazard Alert: Combustible Dust Explosions" (PDF). osha.gov. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-11-01. Retrieved 2018-01-23.
- Nathanson, Iric. The 1878 Washburn A Mill Explosion. Archived from the original on 2014-04-08. Retrieved 2014-04-08.
- ^ Simpson, Timothy W. (2017-08-17), "Will My AM Part Explode? Not if you're careful. Parts built from metallic powder require extra precautions", Modern Machine Shop.
- "Detonation Films – Why Coffee Creamer?". Archived from the original on November 12, 2020. Retrieved March 20, 2011.
- ^ "Dust explosion protection" (PDF). bartec.de. 2005. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2006-12-10.
- NFPA 69 8.3.1
- "Dust explosion concentration – Physical meaning and use in risk assessment of powder minimum explosive concentration (MEC)". PowderProcess.net.
- Murray, Charles Edward Robertson; Wilberforce, Daniel; Ritchie, David (1903), "Mount Kembla Colliery Disaster 31 July 1902 – Report of the Royal Commission, together with minutes of evidence and exhibits", Historical and Cultural Collections – Publications, New South Wales Legislative Assembly: xxxvi, retrieved 19 May 2019
- Roberts, H C W (September 1952), Report on the causes of, and circumstances attending, the explosion which occurred at Easington Colliery, County Durham, on the 29th May, 1951., Cmd 8646, London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, pp. 9, 39–40, hdl:1842/5365
- "List of NFPA Codes & Standards". NFPA.org.
- ^ Hought, Julian (28 February 2011). "Dust to Dust". Retrieved 2015-07-02.
- "Buffalo, NY Grain Elevator Explosion, June 1913 | GenDisasters ... Genealogy in Tragedy, Disasters, Fires, Floods Page 1". www.gendisasters.com. Retrieved 2022-02-28.
- Henry H., Baxter (1980). Grain Elevators (PDF). Buffalo, NY: Buffalo and Erie County Historical Society. p. 14.
- "1 Dead, 2 Lost as Blast in Buffalo Rips World's Biggest Flour Mill". The New York Times. 1972-01-03. ISSN 0362-4331. Retrieved 2022-02-28.
- ^ "Explosion suits settled". The Day. New London, Connecticut. 24 April 1980. p. 26.
- "Corn Starch Dust Explosion at General Foods Ltd, Banbury, Oxfordshire – 18th November 1981". Great Britain: January 1983. Occupational Health & Safety Information Service, UK. ISBN 0-11-883673-0
- Explosion dans un silo d'une malterie(in French)
- "En un emotivo acto presentaron el documental "Elevador 5 – 35 años"". La Nueva (in Spanish). 13 March 2020. Retrieved 17 November 2021.
- "47 Die, 179 Injured in Blast at Linen Mill in Northeast China". Los Angeles Times. March 17, 1987. Retrieved 2015-07-02.
- "Взрыв на шахте «Суходольская-Восточная»". 25 March 2016.
- "Самые масштабные аварии на шахтах за годы независимой Украины". 2 March 2017.
- OSHA report on the Debruce explosion
- "Bosley explosion: Four missing in Wood Flour Mills blast". BBC News. July 17, 2015. Retrieved 2015-12-02.
- Pilling, Kim (July 27, 2015). "Bosley Wood flour mill explosion: Fourth body found in wreckage of building gutted by blast". Mirror Online. Retrieved 2015-12-02.
- Barton, John, ed. (2002). Dust Explosion Prevention and Protection: A Practical Guide. Institution of Chemical Engineers. ISBN 0-85295-410-7.
- Eckhoff, Rolf K. (1997). Dust Explosions in the Process Industries (2nd ed.). Butterworth-Heinemann. ISBN 0-7506-3270-4.
- Price, David J. (1921). "A Disastrous Explosion of Starch Dust". American Miller and Processor. 49 (1–6). National Miller Publications.
External links
Incidents in France and the US:
- Combustible dust explosion investigation products from the Chemical Safety Board
- Combustible Dust Policy Institute-ATEX
- OSHA case studies of dust explosions
Protecting process plant, grain handling facilities, etc. from the risk of dust hazard explosions:
- Hazard Monitoring Equipment – Selection, Installation and Maintenance
- Seminars for Combustible Dust Safety
- HSE (UK) advice on safe handling of combustible dust
- Combustible Dust, CCOHS