Revision as of 02:06, 1 April 2022 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,945 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Comcast/Archive 2) (botTag: Reverted← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 14:41, 21 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,945 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Comcast/Archive 2) (bot |
(29 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header|archive_age=60|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Vital article|topic=Society|level=5|class=B}} |
|
|
{{Not a forum|Comcast}} |
|
{{Not a forum|Comcast}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Companies |class=B |importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Companies |importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pennsylvania |class=B |importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pennsylvania |importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philadelphia |class=B |importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Philadelphia |importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Telecommunications |class=B |importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Telecommunications |importance=high}} |
|
{{WikiProject Media |class=B |importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject Media |importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States |class=B |importance=High |MS=yes |MS-importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States |importance=High |MS=yes |MS-importance=low}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
Line 20: |
Line 19: |
|
|archive = Talk:Comcast/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Comcast/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== style issues == |
|
|
The very first sentence in this article sounds like an advertisement. It really should be written simply as "Comcast Corporation, formerly registered as Comcast Holdings, is a US based mass media and communications company. It is currently ranked as having the highest revenue in the world as a International Media Corporation. |
|
|
== Comcast and AT&T Merger == |
|
|
|
|
|
I feel that the discussion of the merger referenced in item 72, not only leads the audience to presume that comcast has current holdings in AT&T U Verse, but also the source has no affiliation with the security and exchange commission. |
|
|
<ref>{{cite web|title=Denver Business Journal|url=http://www.bizjournals.com/denver/stories/2003/03/24/focus1.html?page=all|website=http://www.bizjournals.com/|publisher=American City Business Journals|accessdate=6 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Office of General Counsel|url=http://transition.fcc.gov/transaction/attcomcast.html|website=http://transition.fcc.gov|publisher=Federal Communications Commision|accessdate=6 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=Federal Communications Commission|url=http://www.fcc.gov/encyclopedia/att-comcast-merger-page|website=www.fcc.gov|publisher=Federal Communications Commision|accessdate=6 June 2014}}</ref> The current Direct TV merger illustrates that competition between the two independent companies exist, and reference the previous use of broadband vs the new DSL method.<ref>{{cite web|title=Forbes Online|url=http://www.forbes.com/sites/dorothypomerantz/2014/05/01/why-comcast-should-cheer-for-att-to-buy-directv/|website=http://www.forbes.com|publisher=Pars International|accessdate=6 June 2014}}</ref> |
|
|
{{reflist}} |
|
|
|
|
|
<small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:22, 6 June 2014</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Ambiguous alert (woo!) == |
|
== Ambiguous alert (woo!) == |
Line 38: |
Line 27: |
|
:Erm, that should've been "''Ambiguity'' alert". Apparently the mobile version of WP's editor doesn't let us correct our Talk topics, just reply to them. I'm married, so this seems familiar. – ] (]) 07:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
:Erm, that should've been "''Ambiguity'' alert". Apparently the mobile version of WP's editor doesn't let us correct our Talk topics, just reply to them. I'm married, so this seems familiar. – ] (]) 07:36, 29 January 2022 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Financial performance: Aug. 25, 2023 changes == |
|
== Overpriced == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings Wikipedians! Two issues here: 1) The narrative part of this section seemed to be outdated. There was text about results from 5-10 years ago but nothing about more recent years. I deleted the outdated text and added a brief, non-judgmental summary of 2022, supported by citations. 2) A web site called "Simply Wall Street" is cited multiple times by prior editors. How do we know that web site is a reliable source? I'd prefer to see something written by a firm or publication that is closer to Misplaced Pages standards. The boilerplate on "Simply Wall Street" is not impressive: "Simply Wall Street Pty Ltd (ACN 600 056 611), is a Corporate Authorised Representative (Authorised Representative Number: 467183) of Sanlam Private Wealth Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 337927)." Full disclosure: I have no conflict of interest or affiliation with Comcast apart from the fact that I use their cable TV and internet products. Cordially, ] (]) 14:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Logo Update from February 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit COI/accepted}} |
|
|
|
|
|
The Comcast logo was updated in early 2024 to include a reflection layer that's not represented here. The new SVG logo is available on Wikimedia Commons, can someone update this here? The correct version of the logo is reflected at https://corporate.comcast.com and at https://brand.comcast.com. |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 02:29, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:This is the correct and current logo that appears on the website. ] (]) 15:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Notifying about SpinCo == |
|
|
|
|
|
Please see ] for discussion related (more directly) to it. <span style="color:#7E790E;">2601AC47</span> (]|]) <span style="font-size:80%"><span style="color:grey;">Isn't a IP anon</span></span> 13:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Moreover, any chance that we could proceed with ] or ]? <span style="color:#7E790E;">2601AC47</span> (]|]) <span style="font-size:80%"><span style="color:grey;">Isn't a IP anon</span></span> 13:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
I am 70 yo caring for 2 disabled adults and an Autistic child I pay 321.95 a month for cable while you took away 2 premium channels and added around 35 minutes of commercials to each show which I know the company's pay also. How many billions do you really have to make? Is billions you and your children and their children will never be able to spend. But I cannot even imagine when I die those I leave behind will remain in poverty and will not afford cable I asked before don't you have an assistance for folks. ] (]) 10:36, 31 March 2022 (UTC) |
|
Greetings Wikipedians! Two issues here: 1) The narrative part of this section seemed to be outdated. There was text about results from 5-10 years ago but nothing about more recent years. I deleted the outdated text and added a brief, non-judgmental summary of 2022, supported by citations. 2) A web site called "Simply Wall Street" is cited multiple times by prior editors. How do we know that web site is a reliable source? I'd prefer to see something written by a firm or publication that is closer to Misplaced Pages standards. The boilerplate on "Simply Wall Street" is not impressive: "Simply Wall Street Pty Ltd (ACN 600 056 611), is a Corporate Authorised Representative (Authorised Representative Number: 467183) of Sanlam Private Wealth Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 337927)." Full disclosure: I have no conflict of interest or affiliation with Comcast apart from the fact that I use their cable TV and internet products. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
The Comcast logo was updated in early 2024 to include a reflection layer that's not represented here. The new SVG logo is available on Wikimedia Commons, can someone update this here? The correct version of the logo is reflected at https://corporate.comcast.com and at https://brand.comcast.com.