| Revision as of 13:31, 20 November 2024 edit2601AC47 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers1,145 edits →Notifying about SpinCo: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 14:41, 21 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,912 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Comcast/Archive 2) (bot |
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) |
| Line 19: |
Line 19: |
|
|archive = Talk:Comcast/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Comcast/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Deleted Imageworks sub-section == |
|
|
|
|
|
Greetings Wikipedians. I deleted the list of bullet points headed "ImageWorks" because it seems totally out of place in the Overview section. There was no context given to explain what ImageWorks is, nor its relationship to Comcast. And I can't think of any reason why those bullet points might belong there, or in this article at all for that matter. And so, being ever-mindful of Misplaced Pages's guidance to "be bold", I have taken action. If that was wrong, please tell us why. Cordially, ] (]) 13:31, 27 December 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Ambiguous alert (woo!) == |
|
== Ambiguous alert (woo!) == |
| Line 50: |
Line 46: |
|
|
|
|
|
Please see ] for discussion related (more directly) to it. <span style="color:#7E790E;">2601AC47</span> (]|]) <span style="font-size:80%"><span style="color:grey;">Isn't a IP anon</span></span> 13:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
Please see ] for discussion related (more directly) to it. <span style="color:#7E790E;">2601AC47</span> (]|]) <span style="font-size:80%"><span style="color:grey;">Isn't a IP anon</span></span> 13:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Moreover, any chance that we could proceed with ] or ]? <span style="color:#7E790E;">2601AC47</span> (]|]) <span style="font-size:80%"><span style="color:grey;">Isn't a IP anon</span></span> 13:33, 20 November 2024 (UTC) |
Greetings Wikipedians! Two issues here: 1) The narrative part of this section seemed to be outdated. There was text about results from 5-10 years ago but nothing about more recent years. I deleted the outdated text and added a brief, non-judgmental summary of 2022, supported by citations. 2) A web site called "Simply Wall Street" is cited multiple times by prior editors. How do we know that web site is a reliable source? I'd prefer to see something written by a firm or publication that is closer to Misplaced Pages standards. The boilerplate on "Simply Wall Street" is not impressive: "Simply Wall Street Pty Ltd (ACN 600 056 611), is a Corporate Authorised Representative (Authorised Representative Number: 467183) of Sanlam Private Wealth Pty Ltd (AFSL No. 337927)." Full disclosure: I have no conflict of interest or affiliation with Comcast apart from the fact that I use their cable TV and internet products. Cordially, BuzzWeiser196 (talk) 14:38, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
The Comcast logo was updated in early 2024 to include a reflection layer that's not represented here. The new SVG logo is available on Wikimedia Commons, can someone update this here? The correct version of the logo is reflected at https://corporate.comcast.com and at https://brand.comcast.com.
level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
