Revision as of 21:39, 8 April 2024 editHoneyteas (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,693 edits updated info.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:11, 21 November 2024 edit undoAsarlaí (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers33,686 edits →top: added more detail; moved a sentence | ||
(19 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{short description| |
{{short description|Military neutrality of the Republic of Ireland}} | ||
{{Use Hiberno-English|date=May 2022}} | {{Use Hiberno-English|date=May 2022}} | ||
{{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} | {{Use dmy dates|date=May 2020}} | ||
] |
] has a longstanding policy of military ], which has meant not joining ]s or ]s, or taking part in international conflicts. The nature of '''Irish neutrality''' has varied over time. The ] declared itself a ] in 1922, and Ireland remained neutral during the ]; although it allowed ] military aircraft to fly through ], and shared some intelligence with the Allies (see ]). During the ], it did not join ] nor the ].<ref name="TonraPreface">Tonra et al. 2012, Preface: {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131017172201/http://ria.ie/getmedia/2f50e24a-9d8a-42df-8ec5-db3efe7583a4/Forward.pdf.aspx#page=3 |date=17 October 2013 }}</ref> Since the 1970s, some have defined Irish neutrality more broadly to include a commitment to "], human rights and ]".<ref name="TonraPreface"/> Recent Irish governments have defined it narrowly as non-membership of military defensive alliances.<ref name="TonraPreface"/><ref>{{cite web |title=Ireland's policy of military neutrality |url=https://www.dfa.ie/our-role-policies/international-priorities/peace-and-security/neutrality/ |publisher=] |quote=Ireland’s policy of military neutrality has long been an important strand of our independent foreign policy and is characterised by non-membership of military alliances or common or mutual defence arrangements.}}</ref> Although the republic is not part of any military alliance, it relies on a NATO member, the United Kingdom, to protect Irish airspace.<ref>{{cite news |title=Who protects Irish skies? The secret air defence deal that dates back to the Cold War |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2023/05/08/who-protects-irish-skies-the-secret-air-defence-deal-that-dates-back-to-the-cold-war/ |work=] |date=8 May 2023}}</ref> It also allows stopovers by some foreign military aircraft, provided they are not armed. | ||
Ireland is one of four ] countries that are ]; the others are ], ] and ]. The compatibility of neutrality with Ireland's EU membership has been a point of debate in ] since the 1990s. The ] acknowledge Ireland's "traditional policy of military neutrality".<ref></ref><ref>{{cite web |title=Ambiguous alliance: Neutrality, opt-outs, and European defence |url=https://ecfr.eu/publication/ambiguous-alliance-neutrality-opt-outs-and-european-defence/ |website=] |date=28 June 2021}}</ref> The ] have been involved in ]. | |||
==Concept== | ==Concept== | ||
Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
This was originally inserted by the ] ratifying the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2002/en/act/cam/0026/index.html|title=Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution Act, 2002|work=]|access-date=4 February 2015}}</ref> and updated by the ] ratifying the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2009/en/act/cam/0028/index.html|title=Twenty-Eighth Amendment of the Constitution Act, 2009|work=]|access-date=4 February 2015}}</ref> An earlier bill intended to ratify the Treaty of Nice did not include a common defence opt-out, and was rejected in the ], in 2001.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?fn=/documents/bills28/bills/2001/1901/default.htm|title=Twenty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 2001 (No. 19 of 2001)|work=Bills|publisher=]|access-date=4 February 2015}}</ref> | This was originally inserted by the ] ratifying the ],<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2002/en/act/cam/0026/index.html|title=Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution Act, 2002|work=]|access-date=4 February 2015}}</ref> and updated by the ] ratifying the ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2009/en/act/cam/0028/index.html|title=Twenty-Eighth Amendment of the Constitution Act, 2009|work=]|access-date=4 February 2015}}</ref> An earlier bill intended to ratify the Treaty of Nice did not include a common defence opt-out, and was rejected in the ], in 2001.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.oireachtas.ie/viewdoc.asp?fn=/documents/bills28/bills/2001/1901/default.htm|title=Twenty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 2001 (No. 19 of 2001)|work=Bills|publisher=]|access-date=4 February 2015}}</ref> | ||
{{anchor|Triple lock}}The Defence Act 1954, the principal statute governing the ], did not oblige members of the ] to serve outside the state (members of the ] and ] were not so limited).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1954/en/act/pub/0018/print.html#partiv-chapiii|title=Defence Act, 1954|work=]|pages=Part IV Chapter III|access-date=3 July 2015}}</ref> A 1960 amendment<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1960/en/act/pub/0044/|title=Defence (Amendment) (No. 2) Act, 1960|work=]|access-date=3 July 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150704040729/http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1960/en/act/pub/0044/|archive-date=4 July 2015|url-status=dead}} replacing the temporary {{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1960/en/act/pub/0022/index.html|title=Defence (Amendment) Act, 1960|work=]|access-date=3 July 2015}}</ref> was intended to allow deployment in ] missions,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail1960120700007?opendocument|title=Defence (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill, 1960—Second Stage.|date=7 December 1960|work=Dáil Éireann debates|pages=Vol.185 No.6 p.7|access-date=3 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/Debates%20Authoring/DebatesWebPack.nsf/takes/dail1960072000039|title=Defence (Amendment) Bill, 1960—Second and Subsequent Stages.|date=20 July 1960|work=Dáil Éireann debates|pages=Vol.183 No.14 p.39|access-date=3 July 2015}}</ref> and requires three forms of authorisation, which since the 1990s have come to be called the "triple lock":<ref name="grnPaperE">{{cite web|url=http://www.defence.ie/WebSite.nsf/grnPaperE#page=10|title=Green paper on Defence|date=July 2013|publisher=Department of Defence|pages=2.6 Military Neutrality, 2.7 Overseas Deployments and the "Triple Lock"|access-date=3 July 2015|location=Dublin}}</ref> | {{anchor|Triple lock}}The Defence Act 1954, the principal statute governing the ], did not oblige members of the ] to serve outside the state (members of the ] and ] were not so limited).<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1954/en/act/pub/0018/print.html#partiv-chapiii|title=Defence Act, 1954|work=]|pages=Part IV Chapter III|access-date=3 July 2015}}</ref> A 1960 amendment<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1960/en/act/pub/0044/|title=Defence (Amendment) (No. 2) Act, 1960|work=]|access-date=3 July 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150704040729/http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1960/en/act/pub/0044/|archive-date=4 July 2015|url-status=dead}} replacing the temporary {{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1960/en/act/pub/0022/index.html|title=Defence (Amendment) Act, 1960|work=]|access-date=3 July 2015}}</ref> was intended to allow deployment in ] missions,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail1960120700007?opendocument|title=Defence (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill, 1960—Second Stage.|date=7 December 1960|work=Dáil Éireann debates|pages=Vol.185 No.6 p.7|access-date=3 July 2015}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/Debates%20Authoring/DebatesWebPack.nsf/takes/dail1960072000039|title=Defence (Amendment) Bill, 1960—Second and Subsequent Stages.|date=20 July 1960|work=Dáil Éireann debates|pages=Vol.183 No.14 p.39|access-date=3 July 2015}}</ref> and requires three forms of authorisation, which since the 1990s have come to be called the "triple lock":<ref name="grnPaperE">{{cite web|url=http://www.defence.ie/WebSite.nsf/grnPaperE#page=10|title=Green paper on Defence|date=July 2013|publisher=Department of Defence|pages=2.6 Military Neutrality, 2.7 Overseas Deployments and the "Triple Lock"|access-date=3 July 2015|location=Dublin|archive-date=27 May 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150527042033/http://www.defence.ie/WebSite.nsf/grnPaperE#page=10|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
# A ] or ]; | # A ] or ]; | ||
# A formal decision by the Irish government; | # A formal decision by the Irish government; | ||
Line 29: | Line 31: | ||
===Before independence=== | ===Before independence=== | ||
] outside ] in 1914, in front of a banner reading "We serve neither King nor Kaiser but Ireland".]] | ] outside ] in 1914, in front of a banner reading "We serve neither King nor Kaiser but Ireland".]] | ||
⚫ | |||
Irish leaders in the ] (1594–1603) allied with ], who sent military aid to the Irish.<ref name="fanning1982p27"/> Following their defeat, ] was a ] of ] and then of ]. During this period, Catholic soldiers from Ireland fought in the armies of several European Catholic countries, in what is known as the ]. In 1644–1645, during the ], the ] sent a ] to help the Scottish Royalists. During the ], the ] sought and received military assistance from the ].<ref name="fanning1982p27"/> | |||
⚫ | Ireland was part of the ] from 1801 to 1922. While ]s supported political integration with Britain, ]s were divided between those who envisaged some continuing link with Britain and the "advanced nationalists", mainly ], who wanted full independence. Separatists generally envisaged an independent Ireland being neutral, but were prepared to ally with Britain's enemies in order to secure that independence, reflected in the maxim "England's difficulty is Ireland's opportunity".<ref name="fanning1982p27">Fanning 1982, p.27</ref> At the outbreak of the ], ] was president of the Irish Neutrality League<ref name="fanning1982p28">Fanning 1982, p.28</ref> and was prosecuted for a banner reading "We serve neither King nor Kaiser but Ireland". During the 1916 ], Connolly and the other leaders of the uprising sought military aid from Germany.<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Martin |first1=F. X. |title=The 1916 Rising: A "Coup d'État" or a 'Bloody Protest'? |journal=Studia Hibernica |date=1968 |issue=8 |pages=106–137 |doi=10.3828/sh.1968.8.7 |jstor=20495897 |s2cid=243122187 |issn=0081-6477}}</ref> | ||
In the 1921 negotiations leading to the ], ] envisaged the ] having a neutral status guaranteed in international law on the model of ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.difp.ie/docs/1921/Anglo-Irish-Treaty/142.htm|title=Memorandum on Irish defence as affected by the British proposals of 20 July 1921|last=Childers|first=Erskine|date=July 1921|work=Documents on IRISH FOREIGN POLICY|publisher=]|pages=Vol. I No. 142|access-date=15 July 2015}}</ref> | |||
===Irish Free State=== | ===Irish Free State=== | ||
Article 49 of the 1922 ] stated, "Save in the case of actual invasion, the Irish Free State ... shall not be committed to active participation in any war without the assent of the ] ". In the ] debate on the draft constitution, the ] rejected a ] amendment requiring assent of the electorate via |
The ] established in 1922 by the ] was a ] of the ], with the UK retaining responsibility for Ireland's marine defence as well as three naval bases, the "]". Article 49 of the 1922 ] stated, "Save in the case of actual invasion, the Irish Free State ... shall not be committed to active participation in any war without the assent of the ] ". In the ] debate on the draft constitution, the ] rejected a ] amendment requiring assent of the electorate via referendum. ] argued "The war that is to be guarded against is a war overseas, is a war that this country may be drawn into by Parliament, by the will of Parliament perhaps, at the instigation of perhaps Canada, or perhaps Australia, or perhaps South Africa, or perhaps Great Britain, and the last is very much the more likely".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Johnson |first1=Thomas |title=In Committee on the Constitution of Saorstát Eireann Bill. — Article 48 |url=https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/1922-10-05/19/#para_132 |website=Dáil Éireann (3rd Dáil) debates |publisher=Houses of the Oireachtas |access-date=31 January 2020 |language=en-ie |date=5 October 1922}}</ref> | ||
In the ], the UK renounced the right to legislate for the Free State. The 1938 ] saw the Treaty Ports handed over to the Free State. | In the ], the UK renounced the right to legislate for the Free State. The 1938 ] saw the Treaty Ports handed over to the Free State. | ||
Line 42: | Line 49: | ||
Ireland remained neutral during World War II. The ] government's position was flagged years in advance by ] ] and had broad support. ] was the only member of ] to oppose it during the war, resigning from ] in 1942 and demanding that Ireland assist the ] (while not necessarily declaring war on the ]).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/1942-07-15/22/ |title=Committee on Finance. – Vote 3—Department of the Taoiseach (Resumed).|date=15 July 1942 |work=Dáil Éireann debates |pages=Vol.88 No.6 |access-date=21 March 2022}}</ref><ref name="RobertsGirvin2000">{{cite book |last1=Roberts |first1=Geoffrey |last2=Girvin |first2=Brian |title=Ireland and the Second World War: Politics, Society and Remembrance |year=2000 |publisher=Four Courts Press |isbn=9781851824823 |page=178}}</ref> However, tens of thousands of Irish citizens, who were by law British subjects, fought in the Allied armies against the Nazis, mostly in the ]. Senators ] and ] also favoured Allied support.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ireland/1940-01-01/ireland-and-war|title=Ireland and the War|last=Gwynn|first=Stephen|date=January 1940|journal=Foreign Affairs|volume=18|issue=2|pages=305–313|doi=10.2307/20029000|jstor=20029000|access-date=15 July 2015}}</ref> | Ireland remained neutral during World War II. The ] government's position was flagged years in advance by ] ] and had broad support. ] was the only member of ] to oppose it during the war, resigning from ] in 1942 and demanding that Ireland assist the ] (while not necessarily declaring war on the ]).<ref>{{cite web |url=https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/1942-07-15/22/ |title=Committee on Finance. – Vote 3—Department of the Taoiseach (Resumed).|date=15 July 1942 |work=Dáil Éireann debates |pages=Vol.88 No.6 |access-date=21 March 2022}}</ref><ref name="RobertsGirvin2000">{{cite book |last1=Roberts |first1=Geoffrey |last2=Girvin |first2=Brian |title=Ireland and the Second World War: Politics, Society and Remembrance |year=2000 |publisher=Four Courts Press |isbn=9781851824823 |page=178}}</ref> However, tens of thousands of Irish citizens, who were by law British subjects, fought in the Allied armies against the Nazis, mostly in the ]. Senators ] and ] also favoured Allied support.<ref>{{cite journal |url=http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/ireland/1940-01-01/ireland-and-war|title=Ireland and the War|last=Gwynn|first=Stephen|date=January 1940|journal=Foreign Affairs|volume=18|issue=2|pages=305–313|doi=10.2307/20029000|jstor=20029000|access-date=15 July 2015}}</ref> | ||
De Valera |
De Valera said in his wartime speeches that small states should stay out of the conflicts of big powers; hence Ireland's policy was officially "neutral", and the country did not publicly declare its support for either side. In practice, while ] pilots who crash-landed in Ireland and German sailors were interned, ] (RAF), ] (RCAF), and ] (USAAF) pilots who crashed were released on personal assurances and usually allowed to cross the ] into British territory (although some Allied personnel were also interned<ref name=klines>{{cite web | last = Matthew McNamara | first = Matthew | title = The Challenge of the Irish Volunteers of World War II | publisher = K-Lines Internment Camp 1940–44 | year = 2008 | url = http://www.curragh.info/klines.htm | access-date = 19 March 2010 }}</ref>). The internees were referred to as "guests of the nation". The German embassy had to pay for their keep. If they were on a non-combative mission they were repatriated. While it was easy for Allied pilots to make that claim, it was not realistic for Luftwaffe pilots to make a similar claim. Towards the end of the war, the German embassy was unable to pay, so the internees had to work on local farms. Strict wartime press censorship had the effect of controlling a moral reaction to the war's unfolding events and reiterated the public position that Irish neutrality was morally superior to the stance of any of the combatants.<ref name="wwiivolunteers">{{cite web | last = Roberts | first = Geoffrey | title = The Challenge of the Irish Volunteers of World War II | publisher = Reform Movement | year = 2004 | url = http://www.reform.org/TheReformMovement_files/article_files/articles/war.htm | access-date = 6 September 2008 }}</ref> | ||
Allied aircraft were allowed to overfly ] to bases in ] |
Allied military aircraft were allowed to overfly ] to bases in ]. This was known as the ]. The bodies of any crashed Allied airmen were repatriated by the Irish Army at the border, where they would be met by an Allied officer. On at least one occasion, an Allied Air Force officer thanked his Irish counterpart for the honour they bestowed upon the repatriated airmen. The Irish captain was said to reply, "Ours may be the honour, but yours is the glory."<ref> {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061026175845/http://www.localdial.com/users/airforce/Doncor.htm |date=26 October 2006 }} A Talk given by Joe O'Loughlin, Local Historian, of Fermanagh, Northern Ireland.</ref> | ||
USAAF aircraft |
USAAF aircraft flying to North Africa refuelled at ] and ]s at nearby ].{{cn|date=November 2024}} | ||
During the war, an estimated 70,000 citizens of neutral Ireland served as volunteers in the ] (and another estimated 50,000 from Northern Ireland).<ref name="wwiivolunteers"/> Those who deserted the Irish Army to serve in the British Army, on returning to Ireland were stripped of all pay and pension rights, and banned for seven years from any employment paid for by state or government funds.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-16287211 |title=Why Irish soldiers who fought Hitler hide their medals |first=John |last=Waite |publisher=] |date=27 December 2011 |access-date=20 July 2012}}</ref> | |||
Irish ] (]) shared information with the British military and even held secret meetings to decide what to do if Germany invaded Ireland to attack Britain, which resulted in ], a plan for joint Irish and British military action should the Germans invade. However General ], the commander of the Irish Second Division based on the Northern Ireland border, had private discussions with the German ambassador, ], about German military assistance in the event of a British invasion from the north.<ref>Ireland in the War Years 1939 – 1940 – T.J. Carroll pg 117</ref> De Valera declined Germany's offer of captured British weapons.<ref>Carroll, (1975). ''Ireland in the War Years'', page 176.</ref> The Germans did have a plan for an invasion of Ireland called ], similar to the Allies' ], but it was only to be put into operation with ], the plan to conquer Britain. | |||
Irish weather reports were crucial to the timing of the ] landings.<ref>{{cite book |page=180 |last=Duggan |first=John P. |title=Herr Hempel at the German Legation in Dublin 1937–1945 |publisher=Irish Academic Press |year=2003 |isbn=978-0-7165-2746-6}}</ref> | |||
During the ] in April 1941, when the Luftwaffe bombed ] in Northern Ireland, De Valera responded immediately to a request for help from ], ]. Fire engines were sent from the south to help their Belfast colleagues. De Valera formally protested to the German government and made a speech declaring "they are our people". | |||
⚫ | Irish neutrality during the war was threatened from within by the ] (IRA), which sought to provoke a confrontation between Britain and Ireland. This plan collapsed, however, when ] ] died in a ] off the Irish coast as part of ]; the Germans also later came to realise they had overestimated the capabilities of the IRA. The American ambassador, David Gray, stated that he once asked de Valera, early in the war, what he would do if ] "liberated" ]. According to Gray, de Valera was silent for a time and then replied "I don't know."{{cn|date=November 2024}} | ||
Ireland wanted to maintain a public stance of neutrality and refused to close the German and Japanese embassies. Unlike many other non-combatant states, Ireland did not declare war on the near-defeated Germany, and therefore did not seize any German assets. Other neutral countries like Sweden and Switzerland expelled German embassy staff at the end of the war, as they no longer represented a state, but the German legation in Dublin was allowed to remain open. | |||
⚫ | Many German spies were sent to Ireland, but all were captured quickly as a result of good intelligence and sometimes their ineptitude. The chief ] spy was ]. | ||
⚫ | Irish neutrality during the war was threatened from within by the ] (IRA), which sought to provoke a confrontation between Britain and Ireland. This plan collapsed, however, when ] ] died in a ] off the Irish coast as part of ]; the Germans also later came to realise they had overestimated the capabilities of the IRA. The American ambassador, David Gray, stated that he once asked de Valera, early in the war, what he would do if ] "liberated" ]. According to Gray, de Valera was silent for a time and then replied "I don't know." |
||
⚫ | As the state was neutral, ] continued to sail with full navigation lights. They had large tricolours and the word "EIRE" <!-- not ÉIRE -->painted large on their sides and decks. Irish ships rescued more than 500 seamen, and some airmen, from many countries during the war. However, many Irish ships were attacked by belligerents on both sides. Over 20% of Irish seamen died, on clearly marked neutral vessels, in the ]. | ||
In 1966, a forest in ] was planted in ]'s honour at Kfar Kana near ]. | |||
⚫ | Winston Churchill, the British wartime Prime Minister, made an attack on the Irish Government and in particular Éamon de Valera in his radio broadcast on ]. Churchill maintained that the British government displayed restraint on the Irish state while the de Valera government were allowed to "frolic with the Germans". Churchill maintained that the British could have invaded the Irish state, but displayed "considerable restraint" in not doing so. De Valera replied to Churchill in a radio broadcast:<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.politics.ie/index.php?title=%C3%89amon_de_Valera_Response_to_Churchill_(Document) |title=Politics.ie – The Irish Politics Website |publisher=Politics.ie |access-date=26 October 2008 |archive-date=28 November 2007 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071128072805/http://www.politics.ie/index.php?title=%C3%89amon_de_Valera_Response_to_Churchill_%28Document%29 |url-status=dead }}</ref> | ||
⚫ | Many German spies were sent to Ireland, but all were captured quickly as a result of good intelligence and sometimes their ineptitude. The chief ] spy was ] |
||
⚫ | As the state was neutral, ] continued to sail with full navigation lights. They had large tricolours and the word " |
||
While civilian aircraft in other countries were frequently requisitioned for military purposes, ] continued to fly a service between Dublin and ] throughout the war.<ref>Manning, G. ''Airliners of the 1960s'', AirLife Publishing, Shrewsbury, UK, p.16</ref> | |||
⚫ | Winston Churchill, the British wartime Prime Minister, made an attack on the Irish Government and in particular Éamon de Valera in his radio broadcast on ]. Churchill maintained that the British government displayed restraint on the Irish state while the de Valera government were allowed to "frolic with the Germans". Churchill maintained that the British could have invaded the Irish state, but displayed "considerable restraint" in not doing so. De Valera replied to Churchill in a radio broadcast:<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.politics.ie/index.php?title=%C3%89amon_de_Valera_Response_to_Churchill_(Document) |title=Politics.ie – The Irish Politics Website |publisher=Politics.ie |access-date=26 October 2008}}</ref> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Mr. Churchill makes it clear that in certain circumstances he would have violated our neutrality and that he would justify his action by Britain's necessity. It seems strange to me that Mr. Churchill does not see that this, if accepted, would mean that Britain's necessity would become a moral code and that when this necessity became sufficiently great, other people's rights were not to count....this same code is precisely why we have the disastrous succession of wars... shall it be world war number three? | Mr. Churchill makes it clear that in certain circumstances he would have violated our neutrality and that he would justify his action by Britain's necessity. It seems strange to me that Mr. Churchill does not see that this, if accepted, would mean that Britain's necessity would become a moral code and that when this necessity became sufficiently great, other people's rights were not to count....this same code is precisely why we have the disastrous succession of wars... shall it be world war number three? | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
Ireland applied to join the ] in 1945, but this was blocked by an objection by the Soviet Union in the security council.<ref>.</ref> ] considered that the UN boycott of Ireland was originally agreed to at the 1945 ] by Churchill and ].<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110609131240/http://www.oireachtas-debates.gov.ie/D/0149/D.0149.195503290016.html |date=9 June 2011 }}.</ref> Despite MacBride's belief, the United Kingdom fully supported Ireland's applications to join the UN.<ref>{{cite web | url=https://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/PV.186 | title=Security Council Official Records Second Year – 186th meeting | date=18 August 1947 | publisher=United Nations | access-date=24 October 2019 }}</ref>(Ireland eventually joined the United Nations in 1955.) | |||
===The Cold War=== | ===The Cold War=== | ||
During the ], Ireland maintained its policy of neutrality. It did not align itself officially with ] |
During the ], Ireland maintained its policy of neutrality. It did not align itself officially with ], the ], or the ]. It refused to join NATO due to a sovereignty dispute over Northern Ireland with the United Kingdom, a NATO member.<ref>{{cite journal |first=Ronan |last=Fanning |title=The United States and Irish Participation in Nato: The Debate of 1950 |journal=Irish Studies in International Affairs |volume=1 |number=1 |year=1979 |pages=38–48: 38 |jstor = 30001704}}</ref><ref>''Aide-mémoire'' to US State Department official on issue of NATO membership, 8 February 1949, National Archives of Ireland, File NAI DEA 305/74 a, Ireland and NATO</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|title ='Coming out of the Cave': The First Inter-Party Government, the Council of Europe and NATO|last = Keane|first = E.|journal = Irish Studies in International Affairs|volume=15 |year=2004 |pages=167–190|doi = 10.3318/ISIA.2004.15.1.167|jstor=30002085 | url=https://muse.jhu.edu/article/845137 }}</ref><ref>Dáil Éireann, Volume 114, 23 February 1949, Oral Answers – Atlantic Pact, 324 (Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Atlantic Pact. Wednesday, 23 February 1949) http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail1949022300018?opendocument Accessed 20150927 | ||
</ref> Ireland offered to set up a separate alliance with the United States but this was refused. This offer was linked in part to the $133 million received from the ] Plan. | </ref> Ireland offered to set up a separate alliance with the United States but this was refused. This offer was linked in part to the $133 million received from the ] Plan.{{cn|date=November 2024}} | ||
However, secret transmission of information from the government to the ] started in 1955. The link was established by ] via a Mr. Cram and the Irish embassy in London, and was not revealed until December 2007.<ref>{{cite web | |
However, secret transmission of information from the government to the ] started in 1955. The link was established by ] via a Mr. Cram and the Irish embassy in London, and was not revealed until December 2007.<ref>{{cite web |date=28 December 2007 |title=Ex Trinity student was CIA's Irish link, records show |url=http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2007/1228/breaking13.html?via=mr |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160305080737/http://www.irishtimes.com/news/ex-trinity-student-was-cia-s-irish-link-records-show-1.816633?via=mr |archive-date=5 March 2016 |access-date=6 September 2008 |work=]}}</ref> In 1962–63, during the ], ] authorised searches of aircraft that stopped over at ] while flying between ] countries and ], for "warlike material".<ref>{{cite web | last = Collins | first = Stephan | title = Lemass authorised aircraft searches during Cuban crisis (Front Page) | work = ]| date = 28 December 2007 | url = http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/frontpage/2007/1228/1198509920335.html | access-date = 6 September 2008}}</ref> | ||
In 1952 the government agreed a secret ] with the UK government regarding ], under which the ] can apply to ] hostile aircraft in Irish |
In 1952 the government agreed a secret ] with the UK government regarding ], under which the ] can apply to ] hostile aircraft in Irish airspace, conscious of the lack of capability of the ] to do so. The agreement has been renewed by subsequent governments despite misgivings. In 2023, Senator ] applied to the ] for a ] of its constitutionality.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Gallagher |first1=Conor |title=Secret Anglo-Irish air defence agreement dates back to the Cold War era |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/ireland/2023/05/08/secret-anglo-irish-air-defence-agreement-dates-back-over-70-years/ |access-date=8 May 2023 |newspaper=The Irish Times |date=8 May 2023 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | Ireland applied to join the then ] in 1963 and finally ]. ], who was Minister for Foreign Affairs ], claims that both Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael in the 1960s and 1970s accepted that European integration would eventually reach a point where Ireland would have to join in defence co-operation.<ref name="FitzGerald2014"/> FitzGerald points to ]'s opposition to the explicit mention of neutrality in a 1981 Dáil motion,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://beta.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/1981-03-11/19/|title=Defence Policy: Motion.|date=11 March 1981|work=Dáil Éireann (21st Dáil) debates|publisher=Oireachtas|access-date=2 March 2018}}</ref> stating that Haughey adopted a more pro-neutrality stance upon entering opposition later in 1981.<ref name="FitzGerald2014">{{cite book|last=FitzGerald|first=Garret|title=Ireland in the World: Further Reflections|chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=d6AHBAAAQBAJ&pg=PT120|access-date=2 March 2018|date=2014-06-27|publisher=Liberties Press|isbn=9781909718777|chapter=The origins, development, and present status of Irish 'neutrality"'}}</ref> | ||
===European Union=== | |||
⚫ | Ireland applied to join the then ] in 1963 and finally ]. ], who was Minister for Foreign Affairs ] and Taoiseach ] and ], claims that both Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael in the 1960s and 1970s accepted that European integration would eventually reach a point where Ireland would have to join in defence co-operation.<ref name="FitzGerald2014"/> FitzGerald points to ]'s opposition to the explicit mention of neutrality in a 1981 Dáil motion,<ref>{{cite web|url=https://beta.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/1981-03-11/19/|title=Defence Policy: Motion.|date=11 March 1981|work=Dáil Éireann (21st Dáil) debates|publisher=Oireachtas|access-date=2 March 2018}}</ref> stating that Haughey adopted a more pro-neutrality stance upon entering opposition later in 1981 |
||
===1990s–2010s=== | |||
⚫ | ==United Nations peacekeeping== | ||
⚫ | {{see also|Ireland–NATO relations}} | ||
⚫ | ] have seen active service as part of United Nations ] activities{{spaced ndash}}initially in the early 1960s ], and subsequently in ] (]) and ] (]). | ||
⚫ | The ] undertook not to change the policy of military neutrality without a referendum.<ref name="pn2133" /> That government's 1996 ] on foreign policy stated:<ref name="pn2133">{{cite book |author=Department of Foreign Affairs |author-link=Department of Foreign Affairs (Ireland) |title=Challenges and opportunities abroad : white paper on foreign policy |chapter-url=http://opac.oireachtas.ie/AWData/Library3/Library2/DL033049.pdf#page=20|series=Official publications|volume=Pn.2133|date=March 1996|publisher=Stationery Office|location=Dublin|pages=15–18|chapter=Agenda for Irish Foreign Policy}}</ref> | ||
==Current policy== | |||
⚫ | The ] |
||
:The majority of the Irish people have always cherished Ireland's military neutrality, and recognise the positive values that inspire it, in peace-time as well as time of war. Neutrality has been the policy of the State in the event of armed conflict and has provided the basis for Ireland's wider efforts to promote international peace and security. | :The majority of the Irish people have always cherished Ireland's military neutrality, and recognise the positive values that inspire it, in peace-time as well as time of war. Neutrality has been the policy of the State in the event of armed conflict and has provided the basis for Ireland's wider efforts to promote international peace and security. | ||
It recommended joining NATO's ] and participating in humanitarian missions of the ] (WEU), but opposed joining NATO or the WEU as incompatible with military neutrality.<ref name="pn2133" /> | It recommended joining NATO's ] and participating in humanitarian missions of the ] (WEU), but opposed joining NATO or the WEU as incompatible with military neutrality.<ref name="pn2133" /> | ||
⚫ | Ireland provided 120 Defence Forces personnel as trainers to the ] mission in the ].<ref name=afgha>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/ireland/2011/0608/1224298573368.html|title=€3m spent on deploying Irish troops to Afghanistan|date=8 June 2011|access-date=1 November 2011|work=]}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishexaminerusa.com/mt/2011/06/14/irish_involvement_in_the_afgha.html|title=Irish Involvement in the Afghanistan War Has Cost Three Million Euros|date=14 June 2011|access-date=1 November 2011|work=Irish Examiner USA}}</ref> The personnel were provided under United Nations mandate.<ref name=afgha /> | ||
⚫ | In |
||
⚫ | The ] did not take a position on the ]. Ireland, then a member of the ], voted "yes" to ], which warned of "serious consequences" if Iraq did not comply with weapons inspectors. Some ] planes were allowed to refuel at ] before and during the conflict, as were civilian aircraft transporting US military personnel; others had permission to overfly Irish air space. A ] of the Dáil on 20 March 2003 approved these arrangements.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail2003032000005|title=Foreign Conflicts: Motion.|date=20 March 2003|work=Dáil Éireann Debates|pages=Vol.563 No.3 p.5|access-date=19 December 2016}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | Anti-war activist Edward Horgan took a case in the ] seeking declarations that the government, in allowing use of Shannon, had breached the state's obligations as a neutral state. While the court held that the ] in ] was that "a neutral state may not permit the movement of large numbers of troops or munitions of one belligerent State through its territory en route to a theatre of war with another", it found this was not part of Irish ], as Irish neutrality was "a matter of government policy only". The Dáil resolution implied that letting military aircraft refuel at Shannon did not amount to "participation" in the war, and the courts had no power to overrule the Dáil on this issue.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IEHC/2003/64.html|title=Horgan v. An Taoiseach|date=28 April 2003|work=High Court of Ireland Decisions|publisher=]|pages= 2 IR 468, 2 ILRM 357, IEHC 64 |no-pp=y|access-date=19 December 2016}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | In 2006, the ], ], announced that the Irish government would open talks on joining the ]. O'Dea said that joining the battlegroups would not affect Ireland's military neutrality, and that a UN mandate would be required for all battlegroup operations with Irish participation. ] foreign affairs spokesperson ] condemned the decision, saying that the government was "discarding the remnants of Irish neutrality".<ref>{{cite web | last = O'Farrell | first = Michael | title = Legislation imminent for EU battle group role | work = Ireland | publisher = Irish Examiner | date = 10 February 2006 | url = https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/arid-10075847.html | access-date = 4 November 2008 }}</ref> | ||
Taoiseach ] said in 2007: "the truth is, Ireland is not neutral. We are merely unaligned".<ref name="neutrality">National Forum on Europe (26 October 2006). {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071118211933/http://www.forumoneurope.ie/eng/index.asp?docID=1099 |date=18 November 2007 }}. Retrieved on 31 October 2007.</ref> | |||
In 2012, the Oireachtas established a ] to review ]s submitted by the public. An early petition sought clarification of government policy in relation to the use of Irish ] by foreign military aircraft. In 2013–16 the committee held discussions with the petitioners, government members, the Secretary General of the ], and academics,<ref>Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions (KildareStreet.com): | In 2012, the Oireachtas established a ] to review ]s submitted by the public. An early petition sought clarification of government policy in relation to the use of Irish ] by foreign military aircraft. In 2013–16 the committee held discussions with the petitioners, government members, the Secretary General of the ], and academics,<ref>Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions (KildareStreet.com): | ||
Line 108: | Line 110: | ||
:The Joint Committee note the lacuna between what is understood by the citizens by neutrality and what is the {{lang|la|de facto}} position. Accordingly, the Joint Committee recommend that the Dáil and ] debate the matter of neutrality with a view to the holding of a Referendum so that the will of the people can be determined. | :The Joint Committee note the lacuna between what is understood by the citizens by neutrality and what is the {{lang|la|de facto}} position. Accordingly, the Joint Committee recommend that the Dáil and ] debate the matter of neutrality with a view to the holding of a Referendum so that the will of the people can be determined. | ||
In 2015, the ] published a foreign policy review which stated, "Our policy of military neutrality remains a core element of Irish foreign policy."<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.dfa.ie/media/dfa/alldfawebsitemedia/ourrolesandpolicies/ourwork/global-island/the-global-island-irelands-foreign-policy.pdf#page=31|title=The Global Island : Ireland's Foreign Policy for a Changing World|date=13 January 2015|publisher=Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade|page=29|access-date=14 September 2017|location=Dublin}}</ref> It defined neutrality as "non-membership of military alliances and non-participation in common or mutual defence arrangements",<ref>Dept of Defence 2015 p.24</ref> while working with international organisations for peacekeeping missions.<ref>Dept of Defence 2015 p.30</ref> | |||
Ireland joined the EU's ] (PESCO) |
Ireland joined the EU's ] (PESCO) when it was founded in December 2017. The ] said it would participate on a case-by-case basis and membership did not compromise neutrality. Fianna Fáil supported membership; Sinn Féin, the Greens, ], and ] opposed it; the Labour Party had reservations.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.thejournal.ie/eu-army-pesco-3734034-Dec2017/|title='We're being asked to sell out our neutrality': Government accused of trying to rush EU defence deal vote|last=Finn|first=Christina|date=7 December 2017|work=]|access-date=24 April 2018}}; {{cite news|url=https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/explainer-ireland-joins-pesco-is-it-the-start-of-an-eu-army-36409443.html|title=Explainer: Ireland joins PESCO... is it the start of an EU army?|last=Bielenberg|first=Kim|date=17 December 2017|work=]|access-date=24 April 2018}}; {{cite web|url=https://www.kildarestreet.com/debates/?id=2018-01-16a.262 |title=European Council: Statements |date=16 January 2018 |work=Dáil debates |publisher=KildareStreet.com |access-date=24 April 2018}}; {{cite web|url=https://www.kildarestreet.com/sendebates/?id=2017-12-13a.293 |title=Permanent Structured Cooperation|date=13 December 2017|work=Seanad debates|publisher=KildareStreet.com|access-date=24 April 2018}}; {{cite web|url=https://www.kildarestreet.com/committees/?id=2017-12-06a.473 |author=Select Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade, and Defence |title=Permanent Structured Cooperation: Motion |date=6 December 2017|work=Oireachtas Joint and Select Committees|publisher=KildareStreet.com|access-date=24 April 2018}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | ===Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine=== | ||
===Recent conflicts=== | |||
⚫ | In a Dáil discussion on the ] in January 2022, ] of ] asked:<ref name="dail20220125">{{multiref| | ||
⚫ | {{see also|Ireland–NATO relations}} | ||
====2001–2021 Afghanistan War==== | |||
⚫ | |||
====2003 invasion of Iraq==== | |||
⚫ | The ] did not take a position on the ]. Ireland, then a member of the ], voted yes to ], which |
||
⚫ | Anti-war activist Edward Horgan took a case in the ] seeking |
||
⚫ | === |
||
⚫ | In a Dáil discussion on the ] in January 2022, ] asked:<ref name="dail20220125">{{multiref| | ||
{{cite web |title=Ministerial Rota for Parliamentary Questions: Motion |url=https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/2022-01-25/7/#s8 |website=Dáil Éireann (33rd Dáil) debates |publisher=Oireachtas |access-date=26 January 2022 |language=en-ie |date=25 January 2022}}| | {{cite web |title=Ministerial Rota for Parliamentary Questions: Motion |url=https://www.oireachtas.ie/en/debates/debate/dail/2022-01-25/7/#s8 |website=Dáil Éireann (33rd Dáil) debates |publisher=Oireachtas |access-date=26 January 2022 |language=en-ie |date=25 January 2022}}| | ||
{{cite news |last1=Duffy |first1=Rónán |title=Taoiseach: Ireland 'not politically neutral but militarily neutral' as Ukraine travel advice is updated |url=https://www.thejournal.ie/training-exercise-russia-ireland-5664154-Jan2022/ |access-date=26 January 2022 |work=TheJournal.ie |date=25 January 2022 |language=en}} | {{cite news |last1=Duffy |first1=Rónán |title=Taoiseach: Ireland 'not politically neutral but militarily neutral' as Ukraine travel advice is updated |url=https://www.thejournal.ie/training-exercise-russia-ireland-5664154-Jan2022/ |access-date=26 January 2022 |work=TheJournal.ie |date=25 January 2022 |language=en}} | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
: |
:Why does the Government correctly condemn Russian military exercises in Irish waters but allow the US military to use Shannon Airport ... Neutrality means not taking sides in dangerous conflicts and game-playing between major imperial powers. | ||
Taoiseach ] replied:<ref name="dail20220125"/> | Taoiseach ] replied:<ref name="dail20220125"/> | ||
:Ireland accepts Ukrainian territorial integrity We're not politically neutral but we're militarily neutral. It's an important distinction. We're members of the European Union. We work with our European Union colleagues in terms of rules-based multilateral approaches to international disputes. | :Ireland accepts Ukrainian territorial integrity We're not politically neutral but we're militarily neutral. It's an important distinction. We're members of the European Union. We work with our European Union colleagues in terms of rules-based multilateral approaches to international disputes. | ||
In response to Russia's ] on 24 February 2022, the ] ] stated that while Ireland is not militarily aligned, the country is "not neutral at all" in relation to this conflict and that "support for Ukraine is unwavering and unconditional".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/oireachtas/ireland-is-not-neutral-says-t%C3%A1naiste-as-70-irish-citizens-remain-in-ukraine-1.4811139|title=Ireland is 'not neutral', says Tánaiste as 70 Irish citizens remain in Ukraine|publisher=]|author-first=Sarah|author-last=Burns|date=24 February 2022|access-date=24 February 2022}}</ref> Days later the ] said it would "constructively abstain" from ], |
In response to Russia's ] on 24 February 2022, the ] ] stated that while Ireland is not militarily aligned, the country is "not neutral at all" in relation to this conflict and that "support for Ukraine is unwavering and unconditional".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/oireachtas/ireland-is-not-neutral-says-t%C3%A1naiste-as-70-irish-citizens-remain-in-ukraine-1.4811139|title=Ireland is 'not neutral', says Tánaiste as 70 Irish citizens remain in Ukraine|publisher=]|author-first=Sarah|author-last=Burns|date=24 February 2022|access-date=24 February 2022}}</ref> Days later the ] said it would "constructively abstain" from an EU fund for ], but contribute instead to a fund that did not include weaponry.<ref>{{cite news |last1=Murphy |first1=David |title=Ireland 'constructively abstains' from EU arms package |url=https://www.rte.ie/news/ireland/2022/0226/1283234-irish-airspace/ |access-date=28 February 2022 |work=RTÉ News |date=27 February 2022 |language=en}}</ref> | ||
In March 2023 a |
In March 2023 a bill to hold a referendum on Irish membership in a hypothetical ] was opposed by the government, who called it "unnecessary".<ref>{{cite web |last1=Loughlin |first1=Elaine |last2=Hosford |first2=Paul |title=Government to oppose 'unnecessary' bill on holding neutrality referendum |url=https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-40839860.html |website=] |date=29 March 2022 |access-date=15 July 2023}}</ref> Micheál Martin said that if the referendum had taken place he was confident it would have passed and that Ireland needs to 'reflect' on the issue of neutrality.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Hosford |first1=Paul |title=Ireland needs to 'reflect' on military neutrality — Taoiseach |url=https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/politics/arid-40890692.html |website=] |date=8 June 2022 |access-date=15 July 2023}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | A ] was held in Dublin, Cork and Galway during 2023. It was a public forum to discuss Ireland's foreign, security and defence policy. Micheál Martin, then Minister for Defence and Foreign Affairs, said every country in Europe had reviewed their defence and security in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Pepper |first1=Diarmuid |title=Tánaiste Micheál Martin is 'developing proposals' around Ireland's neutrality |url=https://www.thejournal.ie/tanaiste-micheal-martin-is-developing-proposals-around-irelands-neutrality-6027927-Mar2023/ |website=] |date=24 March 2023 |access-date=15 July 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Webber |first1=Jude |title=Ireland opens debate on future of military neutrality |url=https://www.ft.com/content/67279122-7cf4-41ad-bc98-24fe8a51538f |website=] |access-date=15 July 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Finn |first1=Christina |title=Public forum examining Ireland's neutrality to be held in Dublin, Galway and Cork in June |url=https://www.thejournal.ie/national-forum-irelands-neutrality-6036486-Apr2023/ |website=] |date=5 April 2023 |access-date=15 July 2023}}</ref> ], ], rebuffed the forum, saying that Ireland was drifting away from neutrality and "playing with fire". His comments were criticised by government ministers.<ref>{{cite web |last1=O'Connor |first1=Niall |title=Tánaiste defends forum as President claims Ireland is 'playing with fire' in neutrality 'drift' |url=https://www.thejournal.ie/michael-d-higgins-neutrality-nato-micheal-martin-6096331-Jun2023/ |website=] |date=18 June 2023 |access-date=15 July 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last1=Downing |first1=John |last2=McTaggart |first2=Maeve |title=Tánaiste Micheál Martin strongly rebuffs comments by President Michael D Higgins on military neutrality and foreign policy 'drift' |url=https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/tanaiste-micheal-martin-strongly-rebuffs-comments-by-president-michael-d-higgins-on-military-neutrality-and-foreign-policy-drift/a255334157.html |website=] |date=18 June 2023 |access-date=15 July 2023}}</ref><ref>{{cite news |last1=Sherlock |first1=Cillian |last2=Black |first2=Rebecca |title=Tánaiste 'developing proposals around neutrality' |url=https://www.breakingnews.ie/ireland/irish-deputy-premier-developing-proposals-around-neutrality-1452714.html |newspaper=] |access-date=15 July 2023}}</ref> The forum was disrupted by anti-NATO protesters from the ]; with Martin describing them as "undemocratic" and "trying to shut down debate".<ref>{{cite news |title=Martin hits out at 'incoherent' protesters who were removed during forum speech in Cork |url=https://www.irishexaminer.com/news/munster/arid-41167795.html |work=] |date=22 June 2023}}</ref> Boyd Barrett accused those involved in the forum of "trying to soften up public opinion to abandoning Ireland's neutrality."<ref>{{cite news |last1=O'Halloran |first1=Marie |title=Ireland is not neutral about Ukraine, Taoiseach insists in renewed row over constitutional position |url=https://www.irishtimes.com/politics/2022/11/15/ireland-is-not-neutral-about-ukraine-taoiseach-insists-in-renewed-row-over-constitutional-position/ |newspaper=] |access-date=15 July 2023}}</ref> | ||
On April 14, ] ], visited Ireland and personally met with Micheál Martin which '']'' assessed showed Ireland drawing closer to the United States and NATO.<ref>{{cite web |last1=Pogatchnik |first1=Shawn |title=World needs Biden 'in time of great danger,' Irish foreign minister says |url=https://www.politico.eu/article/world-need-joe-biden-time-great-danger-ireland-foreign-minister-micheal-martin/ |website=] |access-date=15 July 2023}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | ==United Nations peacekeeping== | ||
⚫ | |||
⚫ | ] have seen active service as part of United Nations ] activities{{spaced ndash}}initially in the early 1960s ], and subsequently in ] (]) and ] (]). | ||
==Weapons control== | |||
A 2004 report by ] noted that the policy of neutrality is a factor in Ireland's lack of an ] and strict ]s on weapons.<ref name="forfas">Forfás 2004, §2.4.1, 3.1.4, 6.3.1</ref> The latter were previously enforced by the Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2009,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2009/en/si/0305.html|title=S.I. No. 305/2009 – Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2009|work=Irish Statute Book|publisher=Attorney General|access-date=2 March 2012|location=Dublin}}</ref> a ] made under the Control of Exports Act 1983.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1983/en/act/pub/0035/index.html|title=Control of Exports Act, 1983|work=Irish Statute Book|publisher=Attorney General|access-date=2 March 2012|location=Dublin}}</ref> The 2009 order was replaced by the Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2012, which reflects the 2008 EU Common Position on Arms Exports.<ref name="dail20180419a69"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2012/si/216/made/en/print|title=S.I. No. 216/2012 – Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2012.|work=]|access-date=24 April 2018}}</ref> The 2004 Forfás report noted concerns about ] and the use as weapons components of products from ] such as chemicals, telecommunications equipment, computer chips and software.<ref>Forfás 2004, §§2.2.6, 3.10.3, 6.5.6</ref> The state is also bound by EU regulations and international ] treaties.<ref>Forfás 2004, pp.17–18</ref><ref name="dail20180419a69"/> In 2017, four export licence applications were refused for dual-use items.<ref name="dail20180419a69">{{cite web|url=https://www.kildarestreet.com/wrans/?id=2018-04-18a.69|title=Military Exports|date=18 April 2018|work=Written answers|publisher=KildareStreet.com|access-date=24 April 2018}}</ref> | A 2004 report by ] noted that the policy of neutrality is a factor in Ireland's lack of an ] and strict ]s on weapons.<ref name="forfas">Forfás 2004, §2.4.1, 3.1.4, 6.3.1</ref> The latter were previously enforced by the Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2009,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/2009/en/si/0305.html|title=S.I. No. 305/2009 – Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2009|work=Irish Statute Book|publisher=Attorney General|access-date=2 March 2012|location=Dublin}}</ref> a ] made under the Control of Exports Act 1983.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/1983/en/act/pub/0035/index.html|title=Control of Exports Act, 1983|work=Irish Statute Book|publisher=Attorney General|access-date=2 March 2012|location=Dublin}}</ref> The 2009 order was replaced by the Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2012, which reflects the 2008 EU Common Position on Arms Exports.<ref name="dail20180419a69"/><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.irishstatutebook.ie/eli/2012/si/216/made/en/print|title=S.I. No. 216/2012 – Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2012.|work=]|access-date=24 April 2018}}</ref> The 2004 Forfás report noted concerns about ] and the use as weapons components of products from ] such as chemicals, telecommunications equipment, computer chips and software.<ref>Forfás 2004, §§2.2.6, 3.10.3, 6.5.6</ref> The state is also bound by EU regulations and international ] treaties.<ref>Forfás 2004, pp.17–18</ref><ref name="dail20180419a69"/> In 2017, four export licence applications were refused for dual-use items.<ref name="dail20180419a69">{{cite web|url=https://www.kildarestreet.com/wrans/?id=2018-04-18a.69|title=Military Exports|date=18 April 2018|work=Written answers|publisher=KildareStreet.com|access-date=24 April 2018}}</ref> | ||
Latest revision as of 16:11, 21 November 2024
Military neutrality of the Republic of Ireland
Ireland has a longstanding policy of military neutrality, which has meant not joining military alliances or defence pacts, or taking part in international conflicts. The nature of Irish neutrality has varied over time. The Irish Free State declared itself a neutral country in 1922, and Ireland remained neutral during the Second World War; although it allowed Allied military aircraft to fly through part of its airspace, and shared some intelligence with the Allies (see Irish neutrality during World War II). During the Cold War, it did not join NATO nor the Non-Aligned Movement. Since the 1970s, some have defined Irish neutrality more broadly to include a commitment to "United Nations peacekeeping, human rights and disarmament". Recent Irish governments have defined it narrowly as non-membership of military defensive alliances. Although the republic is not part of any military alliance, it relies on a NATO member, the United Kingdom, to protect Irish airspace. It also allows stopovers by some foreign military aircraft, provided they are not armed.
Ireland is one of four European Union countries that are not members of NATO; the others are Austria, Cyprus and Malta. The compatibility of neutrality with Ireland's EU membership has been a point of debate in EU treaty referendum campaigns since the 1990s. The Seville Declarations on the Treaty of Nice acknowledge Ireland's "traditional policy of military neutrality". The Irish Defence Forces have been involved in many UN peacekeeping missions.
Concept
There are notable differences between Irish neutrality and “traditional” types of neutral states:
- Traditionally, neutral states maintain strong defence forces; Ireland has a relatively small defence force of approximately 10,500 personnel.
- Traditionally, neutral states do not allow any foreign military within their territory; Ireland has a long history of allowing military aircraft of various nations to refuel at Shannon Airport. Under the Air Navigation (Foreign Military Aircraft) Order, 1952, the Minister for Foreign Affairs, exceptionally, could grant permission to foreign military aircraft to overfly or land in the state. Confirmation was required that the aircraft in question be unarmed, carry no arms, ammunition or explosives and that the flights in question would not form part of military exercises or operations.
After the September 11 attacks, these conditions were "waived in respect of aircraft operating in pursuit of the implementation of the United Nations Security Council Resolution 1368". Irish governments have always said that allowing aircraft to use Irish soil does not constitute participation in any particular conflict and is compatible with a neutral stance, adducing the transit of German troops between Finland and Norway through neutral Swedish territory during World War II.
A neutral state may also allow its citizens to serve in the armed forces of other, possibly belligerent, nations. Ireland does not restrict its citizens from serving in foreign armies, and significant numbers of Irish citizens serve or have served in the British, and to a lesser extent United States armies and the French Foreign Legion.
Legal status
Ireland's neutrality is in general a matter of government policy rather than a requirement of statute law. One exception is Article 29, section 4, subsection 9° of the Irish constitution:
- The State shall not adopt a decision taken by the European Council to establish a common defence pursuant to Article 42 of the Treaty on European Union where that common defence would include the State.
This was originally inserted by the 2002 amendment ratifying the Treaty of Nice, and updated by the 2009 amendment ratifying the Treaty of Lisbon. An earlier bill intended to ratify the Treaty of Nice did not include a common defence opt-out, and was rejected in the first Nice referendum, in 2001.
The Defence Act 1954, the principal statute governing the Irish Defence Forces, did not oblige members of the Irish Army to serve outside the state (members of the Air Corps and Naval Service were not so limited). A 1960 amendment was intended to allow deployment in United Nations peacekeeping missions, and requires three forms of authorisation, which since the 1990s have come to be called the "triple lock":
- A UN Security Council resolution or UN General Assembly resolution;
- A formal decision by the Irish government;
- Approval by a resolution of Dáil Éireann (the lower house of the Oireachtas or parliament, to which the government is responsible).
These provisions were modified in 1993 to allow for Chapter VII missions and again in 2006 to allow for regionally organised UN missions.
History
Before independence
Irish leaders in the Nine Years' War (1594–1603) allied with Habsburg Spain, who sent military aid to the Irish. Following their defeat, all of Ireland was a dependency of England and then of Great Britain. During this period, Catholic soldiers from Ireland fought in the armies of several European Catholic countries, in what is known as the Flight of the Wild Geese. In 1644–1645, during the Wars of the Three Kingdoms, the Irish Confederacy sent a military expedition to Scotland to help the Scottish Royalists. During the Irish Rebellion of 1798, the United Irishmen sought and received military assistance from the French First Republic.
Ireland was part of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland from 1801 to 1922. While Irish unionists supported political integration with Britain, Irish nationalists were divided between those who envisaged some continuing link with Britain and the "advanced nationalists", mainly republicans, who wanted full independence. Separatists generally envisaged an independent Ireland being neutral, but were prepared to ally with Britain's enemies in order to secure that independence, reflected in the maxim "England's difficulty is Ireland's opportunity". At the outbreak of the First World War, James Connolly was president of the Irish Neutrality League and was prosecuted for a banner reading "We serve neither King nor Kaiser but Ireland". During the 1916 Easter Rising, Connolly and the other leaders of the uprising sought military aid from Germany.
In the 1921 negotiations leading to the Anglo-Irish Treaty, Erskine Childers envisaged the Irish Republic having a neutral status guaranteed in international law on the model of Belgium and Switzerland.
Irish Free State
The Irish Free State established in 1922 by the Anglo-Irish Treaty was a Dominion of the British Commonwealth, with the UK retaining responsibility for Ireland's marine defence as well as three naval bases, the "Treaty Ports". Article 49 of the 1922 Constitution of the Irish Free State stated, "Save in the case of actual invasion, the Irish Free State ... shall not be committed to active participation in any war without the assent of the Oireachtas ". In the Third Dáil debate on the draft constitution, the Provisional Government rejected a Labour Party amendment requiring assent of the electorate via referendum. Thomas Johnson argued "The war that is to be guarded against is a war overseas, is a war that this country may be drawn into by Parliament, by the will of Parliament perhaps, at the instigation of perhaps Canada, or perhaps Australia, or perhaps South Africa, or perhaps Great Britain, and the last is very much the more likely".
In the Statute of Westminster 1931, the UK renounced the right to legislate for the Free State. The 1938 Anglo-Irish Trade Agreement saw the Treaty Ports handed over to the Free State.
The Free State joined the International Committee for Non-Intervention in the Spanish Civil War. The Spanish Civil War (Non-Intervention) Act, 1937 made it an offence to travel from Ireland to Spain to fight for either side. This applied both to Irish citizens and nationals of other countries on the committee. Nevertheless, there was Irish involvement in the Spanish Civil War on both sides by private individuals and groups. Another statute related to the committee was the Merchant Shipping (Spanish Civil War) Act 1937, which restricted Irish shipping's access to Spain until 27 April 1939.
World War II
Main article: Irish neutrality during World War IIIreland remained neutral during World War II. The Fianna Fáil government's position was flagged years in advance by Taoiseach Éamon de Valera and had broad support. James Dillon was the only member of Dáil Éireann to oppose it during the war, resigning from Fine Gael in 1942 and demanding that Ireland assist the Allies (while not necessarily declaring war on the Axis). However, tens of thousands of Irish citizens, who were by law British subjects, fought in the Allied armies against the Nazis, mostly in the British army. Senators John Keane and Frank MacDermot also favoured Allied support.
De Valera said in his wartime speeches that small states should stay out of the conflicts of big powers; hence Ireland's policy was officially "neutral", and the country did not publicly declare its support for either side. In practice, while Luftwaffe pilots who crash-landed in Ireland and German sailors were interned, Royal Air Force (RAF), Royal Canadian Air Force (RCAF), and United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) pilots who crashed were released on personal assurances and usually allowed to cross the border into British territory (although some Allied personnel were also interned). The internees were referred to as "guests of the nation". The German embassy had to pay for their keep. If they were on a non-combative mission they were repatriated. While it was easy for Allied pilots to make that claim, it was not realistic for Luftwaffe pilots to make a similar claim. Towards the end of the war, the German embassy was unable to pay, so the internees had to work on local farms. Strict wartime press censorship had the effect of controlling a moral reaction to the war's unfolding events and reiterated the public position that Irish neutrality was morally superior to the stance of any of the combatants.
Allied military aircraft were allowed to overfly County Donegal to bases in County Fermanagh. This was known as the Donegal Corridor. The bodies of any crashed Allied airmen were repatriated by the Irish Army at the border, where they would be met by an Allied officer. On at least one occasion, an Allied Air Force officer thanked his Irish counterpart for the honour they bestowed upon the repatriated airmen. The Irish captain was said to reply, "Ours may be the honour, but yours is the glory."
USAAF aircraft flying to North Africa refuelled at Shannon Airport and flying boats at nearby Foynes.
During the war, an estimated 70,000 citizens of neutral Ireland served as volunteers in the British Armed Forces (and another estimated 50,000 from Northern Ireland). Those who deserted the Irish Army to serve in the British Army, on returning to Ireland were stripped of all pay and pension rights, and banned for seven years from any employment paid for by state or government funds.
Irish military intelligence (G2) shared information with the British military and even held secret meetings to decide what to do if Germany invaded Ireland to attack Britain, which resulted in Plan W, a plan for joint Irish and British military action should the Germans invade. However General Hugo McNeill, the commander of the Irish Second Division based on the Northern Ireland border, had private discussions with the German ambassador, Edouard Hempel, about German military assistance in the event of a British invasion from the north. De Valera declined Germany's offer of captured British weapons. The Germans did have a plan for an invasion of Ireland called Operation Green, similar to the Allies' Operation Bodyguard, but it was only to be put into operation with Operation Sea Lion, the plan to conquer Britain.
During the Belfast Blitz in April 1941, when the Luftwaffe bombed Belfast in Northern Ireland, De Valera responded immediately to a request for help from Basil Brooke, Prime Minister of Northern Ireland. Fire engines were sent from the south to help their Belfast colleagues. De Valera formally protested to the German government and made a speech declaring "they are our people".
Irish neutrality during the war was threatened from within by the Irish Republican Army (IRA), which sought to provoke a confrontation between Britain and Ireland. This plan collapsed, however, when IRA chief of staff Seán Russell died in a U-boat off the Irish coast as part of Operation Dove; the Germans also later came to realise they had overestimated the capabilities of the IRA. The American ambassador, David Gray, stated that he once asked de Valera, early in the war, what he would do if German paratroopers "liberated" Derry. According to Gray, de Valera was silent for a time and then replied "I don't know."
Many German spies were sent to Ireland, but all were captured quickly as a result of good intelligence and sometimes their ineptitude. The chief Abwehr spy was Hermann Görtz.
As the state was neutral, Irish cargo ships continued to sail with full navigation lights. They had large tricolours and the word "EIRE" painted large on their sides and decks. Irish ships rescued more than 500 seamen, and some airmen, from many countries during the war. However, many Irish ships were attacked by belligerents on both sides. Over 20% of Irish seamen died, on clearly marked neutral vessels, in the Irish Mercantile Marine during World War II.
Winston Churchill, the British wartime Prime Minister, made an attack on the Irish Government and in particular Éamon de Valera in his radio broadcast on VE Day. Churchill maintained that the British government displayed restraint on the Irish state while the de Valera government were allowed to "frolic with the Germans". Churchill maintained that the British could have invaded the Irish state, but displayed "considerable restraint" in not doing so. De Valera replied to Churchill in a radio broadcast:
Mr. Churchill makes it clear that in certain circumstances he would have violated our neutrality and that he would justify his action by Britain's necessity. It seems strange to me that Mr. Churchill does not see that this, if accepted, would mean that Britain's necessity would become a moral code and that when this necessity became sufficiently great, other people's rights were not to count....this same code is precisely why we have the disastrous succession of wars... shall it be world war number three?
The Cold War
During the Cold War, Ireland maintained its policy of neutrality. It did not align itself officially with NATO, the Warsaw Pact, or the Non-Aligned Movement. It refused to join NATO due to a sovereignty dispute over Northern Ireland with the United Kingdom, a NATO member. Ireland offered to set up a separate alliance with the United States but this was refused. This offer was linked in part to the $133 million received from the Marshall Aid Plan.
However, secret transmission of information from the government to the CIA started in 1955. The link was established by Liam Cosgrave via a Mr. Cram and the Irish embassy in London, and was not revealed until December 2007. In 1962–63, during the Cuban Missile Crisis, Seán Lemass authorised searches of aircraft that stopped over at Shannon while flying between Warsaw Pact countries and Cuba, for "warlike material".
In 1952 the government agreed a secret memorandum of understanding with the UK government regarding air defence, under which the Royal Air Force can apply to intercept hostile aircraft in Irish airspace, conscious of the lack of capability of the Irish Air Corps to do so. The agreement has been renewed by subsequent governments despite misgivings. In 2023, Senator Gerard Craughwell applied to the High Court for a judicial review of its constitutionality.
Ireland applied to join the then European Communities in 1963 and finally acceded in 1973. Garret FitzGerald, who was Minister for Foreign Affairs 1973–77, claims that both Fianna Fáil and Fine Gael in the 1960s and 1970s accepted that European integration would eventually reach a point where Ireland would have to join in defence co-operation. FitzGerald points to Charles Haughey's opposition to the explicit mention of neutrality in a 1981 Dáil motion, stating that Haughey adopted a more pro-neutrality stance upon entering opposition later in 1981.
1990s–2010s
See also: Ireland–NATO relationsThe 1994 coalition government undertook not to change the policy of military neutrality without a referendum. That government's 1996 white paper on foreign policy stated:
- The majority of the Irish people have always cherished Ireland's military neutrality, and recognise the positive values that inspire it, in peace-time as well as time of war. Neutrality has been the policy of the State in the event of armed conflict and has provided the basis for Ireland's wider efforts to promote international peace and security.
It recommended joining NATO's Partnership for Peace and participating in humanitarian missions of the Western European Union (WEU), but opposed joining NATO or the WEU as incompatible with military neutrality.
Ireland provided 120 Defence Forces personnel as trainers to the International Security Assistance Force mission in the 2001–2021 Afghanistan War. The personnel were provided under United Nations mandate.
The Fianna Fáil-led government did not take a position on the 2003 invasion of Iraq. Ireland, then a member of the UN Security Council, voted "yes" to Resolution 1441, which warned of "serious consequences" if Iraq did not comply with weapons inspectors. Some United States Air Force planes were allowed to refuel at Shannon Airport before and during the conflict, as were civilian aircraft transporting US military personnel; others had permission to overfly Irish air space. A resolution of the Dáil on 20 March 2003 approved these arrangements.
Anti-war activist Edward Horgan took a case in the High Court seeking declarations that the government, in allowing use of Shannon, had breached the state's obligations as a neutral state. While the court held that the custom in international law was that "a neutral state may not permit the movement of large numbers of troops or munitions of one belligerent State through its territory en route to a theatre of war with another", it found this was not part of Irish domestic law, as Irish neutrality was "a matter of government policy only". The Dáil resolution implied that letting military aircraft refuel at Shannon did not amount to "participation" in the war, and the courts had no power to overrule the Dáil on this issue.
In 2006, the Minister for Defence, Willie O'Dea, announced that the Irish government would open talks on joining the European Union battle groups. O'Dea said that joining the battlegroups would not affect Ireland's military neutrality, and that a UN mandate would be required for all battlegroup operations with Irish participation. Green Party foreign affairs spokesperson John Gormley condemned the decision, saying that the government was "discarding the remnants of Irish neutrality".
Taoiseach Enda Kenny said in 2007: "the truth is, Ireland is not neutral. We are merely unaligned".
In 2012, the Oireachtas established a joint committee to review petitions submitted by the public. An early petition sought clarification of government policy in relation to the use of Irish airspace by foreign military aircraft. In 2013–16 the committee held discussions with the petitioners, government members, the Secretary General of the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, and academics, and issued a report, which stated:
- The Joint Committee note the lacuna between what is understood by the citizens by neutrality and what is the de facto position. Accordingly, the Joint Committee recommend that the Dáil and Seanad debate the matter of neutrality with a view to the holding of a Referendum so that the will of the people can be determined.
In 2015, the Fine Gael–Labour government published a foreign policy review which stated, "Our policy of military neutrality remains a core element of Irish foreign policy." It defined neutrality as "non-membership of military alliances and non-participation in common or mutual defence arrangements", while working with international organisations for peacekeeping missions.
Ireland joined the EU's Permanent Structured Cooperation (PESCO) when it was founded in December 2017. The Fine Gael-led government said it would participate on a case-by-case basis and membership did not compromise neutrality. Fianna Fáil supported membership; Sinn Féin, the Greens, Solidarity, and People Before Profit opposed it; the Labour Party had reservations.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine
In a Dáil discussion on the Russo-Ukrainian crisis in January 2022, Richard Boyd Barrett of People Before Profit asked:
- Why does the Government correctly condemn Russian military exercises in Irish waters but allow the US military to use Shannon Airport ... Neutrality means not taking sides in dangerous conflicts and game-playing between major imperial powers.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin replied:
- Ireland accepts Ukrainian territorial integrity We're not politically neutral but we're militarily neutral. It's an important distinction. We're members of the European Union. We work with our European Union colleagues in terms of rules-based multilateral approaches to international disputes.
In response to Russia's invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022, the Tánaiste Leo Varadkar stated that while Ireland is not militarily aligned, the country is "not neutral at all" in relation to this conflict and that "support for Ukraine is unwavering and unconditional". Days later the Department of Foreign Affairs said it would "constructively abstain" from an EU fund for military aid to Ukraine, but contribute instead to a fund that did not include weaponry.
In March 2023 a bill to hold a referendum on Irish membership in a hypothetical European army was opposed by the government, who called it "unnecessary". Micheál Martin said that if the referendum had taken place he was confident it would have passed and that Ireland needs to 'reflect' on the issue of neutrality.
A Consultative Forum on International Security Policy was held in Dublin, Cork and Galway during 2023. It was a public forum to discuss Ireland's foreign, security and defence policy. Micheál Martin, then Minister for Defence and Foreign Affairs, said every country in Europe had reviewed their defence and security in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. President of Ireland, Michael D. Higgins, rebuffed the forum, saying that Ireland was drifting away from neutrality and "playing with fire". His comments were criticised by government ministers. The forum was disrupted by anti-NATO protesters from the Connolly Youth Movement; with Martin describing them as "undemocratic" and "trying to shut down debate". Boyd Barrett accused those involved in the forum of "trying to soften up public opinion to abandoning Ireland's neutrality."
United Nations peacekeeping
Irish Defence Forces have seen active service as part of United Nations peacekeeping activities – initially in the early 1960s Congo Crisis, and subsequently in Cyprus (UNFICYP) and Lebanon (UNIFIL).
Weapons control
A 2004 report by Forfás noted that the policy of neutrality is a factor in Ireland's lack of an arms industry and strict export controls on weapons. The latter were previously enforced by the Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2009, a statutory instrument made under the Control of Exports Act 1983. The 2009 order was replaced by the Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2012, which reflects the 2008 EU Common Position on Arms Exports. The 2004 Forfás report noted concerns about dual-use technology and the use as weapons components of products from major Irish export industries such as chemicals, telecommunications equipment, computer chips and software. The state is also bound by EU regulations and international arms control treaties. In 2017, four export licence applications were refused for dual-use items.
See also
- Foreign relations of the Republic of Ireland
- Ireland–NATO relations
- Neutral states
- Neutral member states in the European Union
- History of Ireland
- History of Northern Ireland
- Conscription in Ireland
- Irish Shipping Limited
- Seville Declarations on the Treaty of Nice
- Visa policy of Ireland
References
Sources
- Tonra, Ben; Kennedy, Michael; Doyle, John; Dorr, Noel (13 April 2012). Irish Foreign Policy. Gill & MacMillan. ISBN 9780717152643.
- Fanning, Ronan (1982). "Irish Neutrality: An Historical Review". Irish Studies in International Affairs. 1 (3). Royal Irish Academy: 27–38. JSTOR 30001722.
- Forfás; Fitzpatrick Associates; Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (May 2004). "Export Licensing of Military and Dual-Use Goods in Ireland" (PDF). Interdepartmental Group on Export Licensing of Military and Dual-Use Goods in Ireland. Archived from the original (PDF) on 26 December 2011. Retrieved 2 March 2012.
- "White Paper on Defence". Department of Defence. August 2015. Archived from the original on 1 February 2017. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
Citations
- ^ Tonra et al. 2012, Preface: The Study of Irish Foreign Policy p.xix Archived 17 October 2013 at the Wayback Machine
- "Ireland's policy of military neutrality". Department of Foreign Affairs (Ireland).
Ireland's policy of military neutrality has long been an important strand of our independent foreign policy and is characterised by non-membership of military alliances or common or mutual defence arrangements.
- "Who protects Irish skies? The secret air defence deal that dates back to the Cold War". The Irish Times. 8 May 2023.
- Seville Declarations on the Nice Treaty
- "Ambiguous alliance: Neutrality, opt-outs, and European defence". European Council on Foreign Relations. 28 June 2021.
- "Military.ie – FAQ". Archived from the original on 26 December 2008. Retrieved 8 January 2009.
- "Irish Statute Book, Statutory Instruments, S.I. No. 74/1952 – Air Navigation (Foreign Military Aircraft) Order, 1952". Irish Statute Book. Irishstatutebook.ie. Archived from the original on 16 March 2007. Retrieved 26 October 2008.
- "Minister for Foreign Affairs, Dail Debate 17 December 2002". Archived from the original on 23 November 2007. Retrieved 13 March 2006.
- "French Foreign Legion Association of Ireland". French Foreign Legion Association of Ireland. 2019. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
- MacCormaic, Ruadhan (8 October 2011). "The legion of extraordinary gentlemen". Dispatches. Irish Times. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
- Sunderland, Cairin (11 December 2017). "The Irish men of the French Foreign Legion". Features. Trinity News. Retrieved 1 December 2019.
- "Constitution of Ireland". Irish Statute Book. Art 29.4.9°. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
- "Twenty-Sixth Amendment of the Constitution Act, 2002". Irish Statute Book. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
- "Twenty-Eighth Amendment of the Constitution Act, 2009". Irish Statute Book. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
- "Twenty-fourth Amendment of the Constitution Bill, 2001 (No. 19 of 2001)". Bills. Oireachtas. Retrieved 4 February 2015.
- "Defence Act, 1954". Irish Statute Book. pp. Part IV Chapter III. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
- "Defence (Amendment) (No. 2) Act, 1960". Irish Statute Book. Archived from the original on 4 July 2015. Retrieved 3 July 2015. replacing the temporary "Defence (Amendment) Act, 1960". Irish Statute Book. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
- "Defence (Amendment) (No. 2) Bill, 1960—Second Stage". Dáil Éireann debates. 7 December 1960. pp. Vol.185 No.6 p.7. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
- "Defence (Amendment) Bill, 1960—Second and Subsequent Stages". Dáil Éireann debates. 20 July 1960. pp. Vol.183 No.14 p.39. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
- ^ "Green paper on Defence". Dublin: Department of Defence. July 2013. pp. 2.6 Military Neutrality, 2.7 Overseas Deployments and the "Triple Lock". Archived from the original on 27 May 2015. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
- "Defence (Amendment) Act, 1993". Irish Statute Book. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
- "Defence (Amendment) Act 2006". Irish Statute Book. Retrieved 3 July 2015.
- ^ Fanning 1982, p.27
- Fanning 1982, p.28
- Martin, F. X. (1968). "The 1916 Rising: A "Coup d'État" or a 'Bloody Protest'?". Studia Hibernica (8): 106–137. doi:10.3828/sh.1968.8.7. ISSN 0081-6477. JSTOR 20495897. S2CID 243122187.
- Childers, Erskine (July 1921). "Memorandum on Irish defence as affected by the British proposals of 20 July 1921". Documents on IRISH FOREIGN POLICY. Royal Irish Academy. pp. Vol. I No. 142. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
- Johnson, Thomas (5 October 1922). "In Committee on the Constitution of Saorstát Eireann Bill. — Article 48". Dáil Éireann (3rd Dáil) debates. Houses of the Oireachtas. Retrieved 31 January 2020.
- "Spanish Civil War (Non-Intervention) Act, 1937". Irish Statute Book. Retrieved 31 August 2010.
- "S.I. No. 35/1937 – Spanish Civil War (Non-Intervention) Act, 1937 (Appointed Countries) Order, 1937". Irish Statute Book. Retrieved 31 August 2010.
- "Spain: International Committee for the Application of the Agreement Regarding Non-Intervention in Spain". The American Journal of International Law. 31 (4, Supplement: Official Documents): 163–179. October 1937. doi:10.2307/2213590. JSTOR 2213590. S2CID 246013596.
- O'Donoghue, Aoife (2010). "Neutrality and Multilateralism after the First World War". Journal of Conflict and Security Law. 15 (1): 169–202. doi:10.1093/jcsl/krp029.
- "S.I. No. 102/1939 - Merchant Shipping (Spanish Civil War) (Revocation) Order, 1939". Irish Statute Book. 27 April 1939. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
- "Committee on Finance. – Vote 3—Department of the Taoiseach (Resumed)". Dáil Éireann debates. 15 July 1942. pp. Vol.88 No.6. Retrieved 21 March 2022.
- Roberts, Geoffrey; Girvin, Brian (2000). Ireland and the Second World War: Politics, Society and Remembrance. Four Courts Press. p. 178. ISBN 9781851824823.
- Gwynn, Stephen (January 1940). "Ireland and the War". Foreign Affairs. 18 (2): 305–313. doi:10.2307/20029000. JSTOR 20029000. Retrieved 15 July 2015.
- Matthew McNamara, Matthew (2008). "The Challenge of the Irish Volunteers of World War II". K-Lines Internment Camp 1940–44. Retrieved 19 March 2010.
- ^ Roberts, Geoffrey (2004). "The Challenge of the Irish Volunteers of World War II". Reform Movement. Retrieved 6 September 2008.
- The Donegal Corridor and Irish Neutrality during World War Two. Archived 26 October 2006 at the Wayback Machine A Talk given by Joe O'Loughlin, Local Historian, of Fermanagh, Northern Ireland.
- Waite, John (27 December 2011). "Why Irish soldiers who fought Hitler hide their medals". BBC News. Retrieved 20 July 2012.
- Ireland in the War Years 1939 – 1940 – T.J. Carroll pg 117
- Carroll, (1975). Ireland in the War Years, page 176.
- "Politics.ie – The Irish Politics Website". Politics.ie. Archived from the original on 28 November 2007. Retrieved 26 October 2008.
- Fanning, Ronan (1979). "The United States and Irish Participation in Nato: The Debate of 1950". Irish Studies in International Affairs. 1 (1): 38–48: 38. JSTOR 30001704.
- Aide-mémoire to US State Department official on issue of NATO membership, 8 February 1949, National Archives of Ireland, File NAI DEA 305/74 a, Ireland and NATO
- Keane, E. (2004). "'Coming out of the Cave': The First Inter-Party Government, the Council of Europe and NATO". Irish Studies in International Affairs. 15: 167–190. doi:10.3318/ISIA.2004.15.1.167. JSTOR 30002085.
- Dáil Éireann, Volume 114, 23 February 1949, Oral Answers – Atlantic Pact, 324 (Ceisteanna—Questions. Oral Answers. - Atlantic Pact. Wednesday, 23 February 1949) http://oireachtasdebates.oireachtas.ie/debates%20authoring/debateswebpack.nsf/takes/dail1949022300018?opendocument Accessed 20150927
- "Ex Trinity student was CIA's Irish link, records show". Irish Times. 28 December 2007. Archived from the original on 5 March 2016. Retrieved 6 September 2008.
- Collins, Stephan (28 December 2007). "Lemass authorised aircraft searches during Cuban crisis (Front Page)". Irish Times. Retrieved 6 September 2008.
- Gallagher, Conor (8 May 2023). "Secret Anglo-Irish air defence agreement dates back to the Cold War era". The Irish Times. Retrieved 8 May 2023.
- ^ FitzGerald, Garret (27 June 2014). "The origins, development, and present status of Irish 'neutrality"'". Ireland in the World: Further Reflections. Liberties Press. ISBN 9781909718777. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
- "Defence Policy: Motion". Dáil Éireann (21st Dáil) debates. Oireachtas. 11 March 1981. Retrieved 2 March 2018.
- ^ Department of Foreign Affairs (March 1996). "Agenda for Irish Foreign Policy" (PDF). Challenges and opportunities abroad : white paper on foreign policy. Official publications. Vol. Pn.2133. Dublin: Stationery Office. pp. 15–18.
- ^ "€3m spent on deploying Irish troops to Afghanistan". Irish Times. 8 June 2011. Retrieved 1 November 2011.
- "Irish Involvement in the Afghanistan War Has Cost Three Million Euros". Irish Examiner USA. 14 June 2011. Retrieved 1 November 2011.
- "Foreign Conflicts: Motion". Dáil Éireann Debates. 20 March 2003. pp. Vol.563 No.3 p.5. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
- "Horgan v. An Taoiseach". High Court of Ireland Decisions. BAILII. 28 April 2003. 2 IR 468, 2 ILRM 357, IEHC 64. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
- O'Farrell, Michael (10 February 2006). "Legislation imminent for EU battle group role". Ireland. Irish Examiner. Retrieved 4 November 2008.
- National Forum on Europe (26 October 2006). Enda Kenny calls for Unified EU Approach to Immigration Archived 18 November 2007 at the Wayback Machine. Retrieved on 31 October 2007.
- Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions (KildareStreet.com): 27 Nov 2013, 12 Mar 2014, 18 Jun 2014, 3 Dec 2014, 18 Feb 2015, 17 Jun 2015, 15 Jul 2015
- Joint Committee on Public Service Oversight and Petitions (February 2016). ". Recommendation of the Joint Committee" (PDF). Report on Petition P00072/12 "Investigation into US Military and CIA use of Shannon Airport and Irish Airspace" from Dr. Edward Horgan and Shannonwatch. Oireachtas. p. 4. Retrieved 19 December 2016.
- "The Global Island : Ireland's Foreign Policy for a Changing World" (PDF). Dublin: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade. 13 January 2015. p. 29. Retrieved 14 September 2017.
- Dept of Defence 2015 p.24
- Dept of Defence 2015 p.30
- Finn, Christina (7 December 2017). "'We're being asked to sell out our neutrality': Government accused of trying to rush EU defence deal vote". TheJournal.ie. Retrieved 24 April 2018.; Bielenberg, Kim (17 December 2017). "Explainer: Ireland joins PESCO... is it the start of an EU army?". Irish Independent. Retrieved 24 April 2018.; "European Council: Statements". Dáil debates. KildareStreet.com. 16 January 2018. Retrieved 24 April 2018.; "Permanent Structured Cooperation". Seanad debates. KildareStreet.com. 13 December 2017. Retrieved 24 April 2018.; Select Committee on Foreign Affairs and Trade, and Defence (6 December 2017). "Permanent Structured Cooperation: Motion". Oireachtas Joint and Select Committees. KildareStreet.com. Retrieved 24 April 2018.
- ^
- "Ministerial Rota for Parliamentary Questions: Motion". Dáil Éireann (33rd Dáil) debates. Oireachtas. 25 January 2022. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
- Duffy, Rónán (25 January 2022). "Taoiseach: Ireland 'not politically neutral but militarily neutral' as Ukraine travel advice is updated". TheJournal.ie. Retrieved 26 January 2022.
- Burns, Sarah (24 February 2022). "Ireland is 'not neutral', says Tánaiste as 70 Irish citizens remain in Ukraine". The Irish Times. Retrieved 24 February 2022.
- Murphy, David (27 February 2022). "Ireland 'constructively abstains' from EU arms package". RTÉ News. Retrieved 28 February 2022.
- Loughlin, Elaine; Hosford, Paul (29 March 2022). "Government to oppose 'unnecessary' bill on holding neutrality referendum". Irish Examiner. Retrieved 15 July 2023.
- Hosford, Paul (8 June 2022). "Ireland needs to 'reflect' on military neutrality — Taoiseach". Irish Examiner. Retrieved 15 July 2023.
- Pepper, Diarmuid (24 March 2023). "Tánaiste Micheál Martin is 'developing proposals' around Ireland's neutrality". TheJournal.ie. Retrieved 15 July 2023.
- Webber, Jude. "Ireland opens debate on future of military neutrality". Financial Times. Retrieved 15 July 2023.
- Finn, Christina (5 April 2023). "Public forum examining Ireland's neutrality to be held in Dublin, Galway and Cork in June". TheJournal.ie. Retrieved 15 July 2023.
- O'Connor, Niall (18 June 2023). "Tánaiste defends forum as President claims Ireland is 'playing with fire' in neutrality 'drift'". TheJournal.ie. Retrieved 15 July 2023.
- Downing, John; McTaggart, Maeve (18 June 2023). "Tánaiste Micheál Martin strongly rebuffs comments by President Michael D Higgins on military neutrality and foreign policy 'drift'". Irish Independent. Retrieved 15 July 2023.
- Sherlock, Cillian; Black, Rebecca. "Tánaiste 'developing proposals around neutrality'". The Irish Times. Retrieved 15 July 2023.
- "Martin hits out at 'incoherent' protesters who were removed during forum speech in Cork". Irish Examiner. 22 June 2023.
- O'Halloran, Marie. "Ireland is not neutral about Ukraine, Taoiseach insists in renewed row over constitutional position". The Irish Times. Retrieved 15 July 2023.
- Forfás 2004, §2.4.1, 3.1.4, 6.3.1
- "S.I. No. 305/2009 – Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2009". Irish Statute Book. Dublin: Attorney General. Retrieved 2 March 2012.
- "Control of Exports Act, 1983". Irish Statute Book. Dublin: Attorney General. Retrieved 2 March 2012.
- ^ "Military Exports". Written answers. KildareStreet.com. 18 April 2018. Retrieved 24 April 2018.
- "S.I. No. 216/2012 – Control of Exports (Goods and Technology) Order 2012". Irish Statute Book. Retrieved 24 April 2018.
- Forfás 2004, §§2.2.6, 3.10.3, 6.5.6
- Forfás 2004, pp.17–18
Further reading
- Brown, Terence (1985). Ireland: A Social and Cultural History, 1922 to the Present. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-1731-3.
- Tonra, Ben (19 July 2013). "Security, defence and neutrality". Global citizen and European Republic: Irish foreign policy in transition. Manchester University Press. pp. 153–180. doi:10.7765/9781847792358.00013. ISBN 9781847792358.
External links
- Irish Peace and Neutrality Alliance
- Campaign for Irish Neutrality and Democracy
- Fine Gael "Beyond Neutrality" Document (pdf)
- Beyond Neutrality Questions and Answers Archived 5 December 2008 at the Wayback Machine
- Second World War online resource for NI Archived 21 June 2007 at the Wayback Machine