| Revision as of 02:15, 20 March 2021 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,176 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Facial (sexual act)/Archive 4) (bot← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 14:48, 25 November 2024 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,176 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:Facial (sexual act)/Archive 4) (bot |
| (28 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Censor}} |
|
{{Censor}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|1= |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Sexuality|importance=mid|class=B}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sexology and sexuality|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pornography|importance=mid|class=B}} |
|
{{WikiProject Pornography|importance=mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
| Line 13: |
Line 13: |
|
|archive = Talk:Facial (sexual act)/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Facial (sexual act)/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Auto archiving notice |bot=Lowercase sigmabot III |age=90 |units=days}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Lips == |
|
|
|
|
|
"...could come into contact with broken skin or sensitive mucous membranes (eyes, lips, mouth),..." The lips are not mucous membranes.--] (]) 19:49, 5 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Genders == |
|
|
|
|
|
The "criticisms_and_responses" section is mainly about main ejaculating on women. Is there any information about facial cumshots where the ejaculator is not a man and/or the ejaculee(?) is not a woman? ] (]) 05:09, 19 January 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 18 February 2021 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Facial (sexual act)|answered=yes}} |
|
|
I believe the image depicting a white woman receiving a black man's cum should be changed to a similar image of a black woman receiving white man's cum. This will help racial diversity, improve race relations, and make Misplaced Pages a place for all to enjoy. |
|
|
Thank you. ] (]) 15:07, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
: You'd have to find another free image to use and start an RFC to see if anyone wants to change the status quo. ] (]) 16:12, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
::OP Indefinately blocked. -] ] 19:23, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Merger proposal == |
|
|
|
|
|
I propose to merge ] into ]. Currently the pearl necklace article is a dictionary definition plus a collection of pop-culture trivia. Most of the current sources are passing mentions or dictionary definitions; the closest thing to ] is the entry in ''Sex Tips for Straight Women from a Gay Man'', which definitely isn't ]. I looked for additional sources and found only dictionary entries (), junk sources, and trivial coverage. Cheers, ]] 14:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
*'''Support'''. Makes sense, and even if the above didn't apply, the two concepts are so closely related that ] could be invoked. <span style="font-family:Palatino">]</span> <sup>]</sup> 03:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC) |
|
.svg){kind=small}
