Revision as of 23:49, 8 February 2019 editResnjari (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users27,465 edits →The article need an overhaul. Its got all sorts of WP:PRIMARY everywhere.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:01, 29 November 2024 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,569,545 edits Adding/updating {{OnThisDay}} for 2024-11-28. Errors? User:AnomieBOT/shutoff/OnThisDayTagger |
(139 intermediate revisions by 62 users not shown) |
Line 16: |
Line 16: |
|
|topic=History |
|
|topic=History |
|
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|
|currentstatus=FGAN |
|
|
|otd1date=2007-11-28|otd1oldid=174325507 |
|
|
|otd2date=2008-11-28|otd2oldid=254539953 |
|
|
|otd3date=2009-11-28|otd3oldid=328209906 |
|
|
|otd4date=2010-11-28|otd4oldid=399342694 |
|
|
|otd5date=2011-11-28|otd5oldid=462797273 |
|
|
|otd6date=2013-11-28|otd6oldid=583637590 |
|
|
|otd7date=2014-11-28|otd7oldid=635675347 |
|
|
|otd8date=2016-11-28|otd8oldid=751878425 |
|
|
|otd9date=2019-11-28|otd9oldid=928350819 |
|
|
|otd10date=2023-11-28|otd10oldid=1186138936 |
|
|
|otd11date=2024-11-28|otd11oldid=1259937010 |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C|vital=yes|living=n|listas=Skanderbeg|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|military-work-group=y|military-priority=Low|royalty-work-group=y|royalty-priority=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Military history |
|
|
|class =C |
|
|
|b1 <!-- Referencing and citations --> =n |
|
|
|b2 <!-- Coverage and accuracy --> =y |
|
|
|b3 <!-- Structure --> =y |
|
|
|b4 <!-- Grammar and style --> =y |
|
|
|b5 <!-- Supporting materials --> =y |
|
|
|Biography =y |
|
|
|Balkan =y |
|
|
|Medieval =y}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Albania|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Italy|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Kosovo|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject North Macedonia|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Middle Ages|Crusades-task-force=yes|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Montenegro |importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Former countries|Ottoman=yes|Ottoman-importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Religion|importance=Mid|Interfaith=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Serbia|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=SMasters |date=December 17, 2010|old-user-1=Reaper Eternal|old-date-1=November 26, 2010}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=no|class=C|military-work-group=yes|royalty-work-group=yes|listas=Skanderbeg}} |
|
|
{{WPMILHIST|class=c |
|
|
<!-- B-Class checklist --> |
|
|
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |
|
|
|B-Class-1=no |
|
|
<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and |
|
|
does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |
|
|
|B-Class-2=yes |
|
|
<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. -->|B-Class-3=yes |
|
|
<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. -->|B-Class-4=yes |
|
|
<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |
|
|
|B-Class-5=yes |
|
|
|Biography=yes|Balkan=yes|Medieval=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Albania|class=c <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=no<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes <!-- 6. It is written from a neutral point of view. --> |B-Class-6=yes |importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Italy|class=c|importance=low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Kosovo|class=c|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Republic of Macedonia|class=c|importance=Top}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Middle Ages|Crusades-task-force=yes|class=c|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Montenegro |class=c|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Ottoman Empire|class=c|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Middle Ages|class=C|Crusades-task-force=yes}} |
|
|
{{WPReligion|class=c|importance=mid|Interfaith=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Serbia|class=c|importance=mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=SMasters |date=December 17, 2010 |
|
|
|old-user-1=Reaper Eternal|old-date-1=November 26, 2010}}}} |
|
|
{{OnThisDay |date1=2007-11-28|oldid1=174325507|date2=2008-11-28|oldid2=254539953|date3=2009-11-28|oldid3=328209906|date4=2010-11-28|oldid4=399342694|date5=2011-11-28|oldid5=462797273|date6=2013-11-28|oldid6=583637590|date7=2014-11-28|oldid7=635675347|date8=2016-11-28|oldid8=751878425}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
|
|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes |
Line 55: |
Line 62: |
|
|archive = Talk:Skanderbeg/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:Skanderbeg/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Vital article|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Military leaders|class=C}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Skanderbeg origin, sources == |
|
|
|
|
|
Ever since a group of pro-Albanian editors took control over the article against ], other editors have been strugling to edit and expand the article. Instances of such behavior can be observed in their inflexibility to accept changes backed by ]. The problem is even greater giving the fact that the vesion they wrote and they prevent editors from changing or expanding, is unsouced. For someone fom outside things may not be clear, but, we are facing clear Albanian-POV pushing in which they tend to marginalise and gather all together all different theories of Skanderbeg origin, that way discrediting them all. |
|
|
|
|
|
is absolutelly unecceptable. Not only restores an unsourced claim (not even one source claims Skanderbeg was "possibly of Serbian or Bulgaian origin") but also prevents expanding each claim by itself. |
|
|
|
|
|
Another, quite contentious aspect, is their addition of "possibly",. which is wrong, because most sources, as least for the Serbian origin claim, don´t use the expression of "possibility" neither any other expressing doubts. Lets see some of the sources backing up Skanderbegs Serbian origin theory: |
|
|
|
|
|
* by Francis Stevenson, citarion: "'''Skanderber himself, as has been seen - Skanderbergthe national hero of the Albanians, was of Serb origin.'''" |
|
|
|
|
|
* by Theodōros Spandouginos, page 47. Citation: "'''For some years it has been ruled by by Skanderbeg, a most valiant man of Serbian oigin'''."] |
|
|
|
|
|
* by Ramón Máiz and Safran William, citation: "'''This force was led by John Kastrioti, who was of mixed Albanian-Serbian origin, and whose son, Skenderbeg, was venerated by Albanians at the time were Christian and their solidarity with the Serbs was not difficult to comprehend'''." |
|
|
|
|
|
* by balcanicaucaso.org, citation: " '''Skanderbeg, the greatest Albanian hero, is the perfect example of this – his father was from Albanian family Castriot, while his mother Vojislava was of Serbian origin; his older brother was Sinisha, which is a Serbian or, to be more accurate, Slavic name'''." |
|
|
|
|
|
* by Marko Miljanov Popovich, page 59, citation: "'''George Kastriota (Skanderbeg), (1404–1468) an Orthodox Christian ruler of Albania. His father, John Kastriota (of the Serbian origin), led the'''..." |
|
|
|
|
|
* by Walter Yust, 1952, page 762, citation: "'''(Skanderbeg) out wearing a royal crown, was of Serbian origin. The founder of the family of Castriota was a certan Branilo, who was governor of Kanina in 1368, and whose gandson, Giovani lord of Mat and Vumenestia, married Voisava Tripalda, daughter of a Serbian magnate.'''" |
|
|
|
|
|
* - Volume 8; Volume 24 - Page 878, pblished 1998, citation: "'''...son of John Kastrioti (Castriota), a high official of Serbian origin, and his given name was George.'''" |
|
|
|
|
|
These are just some of the first results I am finding and all in English. Would you now be kind and revert yourself so we can properly expand Serbian origin part? ] (]) 21:42, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:ok {{u|FkpCascais}} once again Spandouginos is ] and so is Miljanov. Both sources are old with the first being some 500 years old and the second over a hundred years old. In those cases ]. Britannica and Americana are ] etc and most articles contain content based on ]. Please this is not some thing about ].] (]) 22:09, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:How is that Spandouginos is primary source? I don´t see at his book any citation quotes which would means he is refering to some old text of someone elses words. About the rest, in one way or another, they do say the same, which is Skanderbeg has Serbian origin. We are not strict to use just nowadays sources. Anyway, I will keep on bringing sources. ] (]) 22:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::Going by your comment I'm getting this vibe that you haven't had a good look at some of the sources your using. With Spandouginos, p.iii.. Its clearly stated its a translation of a text from some 500 years ago etc. Please desist for the time being as your going into ] territory.] (]) 22:24, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
More sources: |
|
|
|
|
|
* by Ivo Vukcevich, page 246, citation: "'''According to some sources, great-grandfather, Branilo Castriot, was a Serb (dórigine Serbe) in the company of Serbs. .... It is a matter of record that thee Castrior estates in Albania can be traced to Skanderbeg´s gandfather , Pal, who receved his estates from Serbian Emperir Dushan in 1345.'''" |
|
|
|
|
|
Mu friend, I am adding sourced material which is missing. I will bring much more. ] (]) 22:37, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{u|FkpCascais}} your just confriming more and more that your not having a proper look the sources your using. Your latest addition based on Ivo Vukcevich is a self published source (]) done through Xlibris. Misplaced Pages does not allow for use of publications that are self published.] (]) 22:54, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
* by Komnen Bećirović, pages 8, 9, citation:"... '''sur le origine serbe de George Castriote, dit Skanderbeg''',..." ] (]) 22:58, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::I'm very concerned on the way your going about things here. Editors have expressed multiple concerns with the sources used, and you have repeatedly put them back and then added more problematic sources into the article. Please desist. The editing is going into ] and ] territory. I have engaged you in good faith and its very disappointing seeing all this.] (]) 23:08, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I am also very concern that what you call "editors" is just the 3 of you Albanians who happened team-tag and OWN articles. It is time to end this. I will keep on bringing sources cause WP:RS and WP:Verifiability is all that matters. ] (]) 23:18, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::::{{u|FkpCascais}} again why are you resorting to personal attacks. Whatever a person's ethnic heritage or origin maybe that should not be part of any discussion here. Please stop with this. Show good faith.] (]) 23:29, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::At begining I had all good-faith, also because I have great Albanian friends in personal life. But you make me loose it when I see that here at Misplaced Pages tha tactic that you use is to make endless objections at talk-page in order to leave some info you dislike out of the article. You tried to disrgard Skandebeg Serbian origin theories by minimasing them and equalising them to some considerably lower in impotance origin theories such as the Bulgarian one. You should have shown good-faith when I asked you to respect WP rules and separate the two claims cause no source claimed both simultaneously, while all claim either one or another, You did it to prevent expanding the Serbian origin claim, as you still do. And, as you can see, there are plenty of sources for it. ] (]) 23:38, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::{{u|FkpCascais}} how many Albanian friends you have is not something that any editor asked you and not a concern here. What is a concern is that you have rammed your edits into the article showing clear ] behavior when multiple concerns were raised by other editors about the sources you have used and the way you have gone about things. Its disappointing.] (]) 23:50, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::I also don´t care if you are disapointed or what, all I want is for us to make the best possible article based on reliable sources. ] (]) 23:55, 13 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::{{u|FkpCascais}}, good. So show good faith and revert your additions that you have no consensus for and also use sources are problematic.] (]) 00:02, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::No, this state of article is certainly better than the previous, because the previous edit was unsourced and indicated total undue-weight regading the Serbian origin of Skanderbeg. I asked Deb for a sugestion, lets, wait. ] (]) 00:10, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::::{{u|FkpCascais}}, your just showing more ] behavior. Again disappointing.] (]) 00:15, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
{{od}} |
|
|
Per ]: to ] and structure an article so as to avoid ] and ] the common views of scholars should be consulted. In many historical topics, scholarship is divided, so several scholarly positions should be relied upon. Some people masquerading as scholars actually present ] views outside of the accepted practice, and these should not be used. To determine scholarly opinions about a historical topic, consult the following sources in order: |
|
|
# Recent scholarly books and chapters on the historiography of the topic |
|
|
# "Review Articles", or historiographical essays that explicitly discuss recent scholarship in an area. |
|
|
# Similarly conference papers that were peer reviewed in full before publication that are field reviews or have as their central argument the historiography |
|
|
# Journal articles or peer reviewed conference papers that open with a review of the historiography etc. |
|
|
Per above mentioned classification: ], who is an expert of Albanian issues claims in his Historical Dictionary of Albania, Volume 75 of Historical Dictionaries of Europe, Second edition, published by Academic publisher ], recently (2010), ISBN 081087380X, p. 398 in the article on Skanderbeg himself: |
|
|
:''Albanian prince and national hero. The real name of Scanderbeg (Alb. Skenderbej, def. Skenderbeu) was George Castriotta (Alb. Gjergj Kastrioti). George Castriotta came from a family of landowners from the Dibra region in northeastern Albania, who were no doubt of'' '''mixed Albanian-Slavic ancestry.''' |
|
|
That is ] and meets the criteria above. ] (]) 07:50, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::The problem is that the ammount of sources claiming Serbian (not generalistically "Slavic") ancestry is so significant that clearly deserves a mention. ] (]) 09:17, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:::], I have checked the first 3 of them. The first one is called "A History of Montenegro" by Francis Stevenson. It was published for the first time more then 100 years ago and is out of date, i.e. not reliable source. The second book is written by Theodore Spandounes: "On the Origins of the Ottoman Emperors". Spandounes died in 1538, i.e. this book is totally out of date. The third one is the only reliable source: "Identity and Territorial Autonomy in Plural Societies" by Ramón Máiz and Safran William, and claims ''Kastrioti was of mixed Albanian-Serbian origin'', that is as a whole in accordance with the article. ] (]) 10:16, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Thank you. What about the others? ] (]) 10:20, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Ok, ]. The next 3 sources are: '''1.''' What can Germans and French learn from Serbs and Albanians? by Aleksandar Pavlović, published on the research on-line magazine called OBC Transeuropa, i.e. it is reliable at some degree. ''It claims: Skanderbeg, the greatest Albanian hero... his father was from Albanian family Castriot, while his mother Vojislava was of Serbian origin;'' Simply the mixed origins story is confirmed. '''2.''' HONOR and HEROISM by ], who died on February 2, 1901. He is a Serbian author and the book was simply translated in English. I would say, it is somehow biased source, and out of date, i.e. not reliable. '''3.''' Encyclopædia Britannica: a new survey of universal knowledge by Walter Yust, 1952 edition. This source confirms the thesis on the Serbian origin of Skanderbeg. Nevertheless it is ca. 70 years old, that means this publication does not meet the criteria on recent scholarship mentioned above. ] (]) 10:55, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Can I suggest that a RfC is opened here. It pretty much looks there will be a snow closure, so this might be the simplest way to resolve this.] (]) 11:56, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:Its time to revert to the stable version of the article before all the events of the past 24 hours. After that a discussion can resume about these things hopefully this time in good faith by all editors. Best.] (]) 19:28, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::It's obvious that an essential part from the ] belongs to this article. I wonder why there is nothing in here yet. {{u|FkpCascais}} {{u|Jingiby}} {{u|Resnjari}} {{u|Antidiskriminator}} suggestions?] (]) 21:57, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Do not ping FkpCascais as he is topic-banned. ] (]) 21:59, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
::::{{u|Alexikoua}}, unless this discussion is about a merger of the ] article into this one (and deletion of that article), we ain't creating forks all over the place. Also pinging {{u|Calthinus}} and {{u|Ktrimi991}} as they have been involved in the editing of this article. And do take @Ktrimi991's advice, don't ping topic banned editors, as they got themselves into enough trouble as it is with this page. They have had enough excitement for the day.] (]) 22:07, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== The islamic view == |
|
I see no consensus on the view of a "pure Albanian" in the LEAD. After all, how can a person be just "Albanian" when his mother is not, at a time that "Albanian" was not an official nationality, and when he never claimed that he is of certain ethnicity? I think the LEAD should reflect modern views on the man.--] (]) 12:16, 30 January 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The article is almost exclusively presenting the western-albanian view on the subject. However, there is a good volume of islamic/ottoman historiography on Sk., claiming that the western is "propaganda". Of course the islamic historiography can also be characterized as "propaganda", but the spirit of WP is to present all views, so as to produce the famous "neutral p.o.v.". Would it be proper to open a section presenting the islamic (or pro-Ottoman / Turkish) point of view? ] (]) 19:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
==Mediation== |
|
|
There are so many souces backing his Serbian origin than your removal of sourced content about it is disruptive. I will open a mediation for this. ] (]) 09:44, 14 December 2018 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Your point being? ] (]) 12:25, 26 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
== Any reason the Greek name is excluded? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KOPAŃSKI, A. B. (1997). ISLAMIZATION OF ALBANIANS IN THE MIDDLE AGES: THE PRIMARY SOURCES AND THE PREDICAMENT OF THE MODERN HISTORIOGRAPHY. Islamic Studies, 36(2/3), 191–208. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23076194 |
|
First, I don't see why the name in other languages should be given first in Albanian. Did he ever write his name in Albanian? This form of name appeared about 2 centuries after his death. |
|
|
|
* Ivan Kastrioti, serbo-albanian war lord (p. 195). |
|
|
* The clans of southern and central Albanians refused to join Skanderbeg. |
|
|
* Kastrioti and others received every year 1.400 golden ducats from the Pope. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:] on the first two. Gjon Kastrioti was most definitely not Serbo-Albanian, and some of the southern and central clans did indeed join Skanderbeg (e.g. Muzaka, Arianiti, Topia and smaller clans and groups). The last one may be true, I don't know the exact amount, but I think he did receive minimal financial aid from the Pope. Based on the fact that the paper calls Gjon Kastrioti a Serbo-Albanian warlord, the source shouldn't be used. Additionally, this isn't technically the Islamic/Ottoman view on anything - he was a Pole who converted to Islam during adulthood and was very religiously-biased in his work. ] (]) 04:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
On the other hand, the Greek form of his surname appeared in some important Greek chronicles, mainly that of Laonikos Chalkokondyles, his contemporary. Some other late byzantine chronicographs simply ignored him, because he was not as an important figure as some claimed later. We had to wait till late 20th c. the monumental work of Oliver Schimt to learn that Skanderbeg was only partly accepted in his country, never won a major battle, and never ruled a city. Anyway, for the learned readers of WP, the Greek name is important. Obviously the latin Georgius Castrioti is a transliteration from the Greek. I added for the moment the original text of Chalkokondyles, and soon I will add some more modern sources citing the greek text of Chalkokondyles. Unfortunatelly, it is not easy to find a modern non-greek publication that cites the name in greek letters. This is one of the cases where the "primary sources" have to be used. We don't use any info from Chalkokondyles, other than the wording of the name, and this is not a problem. Regretably, some friends here insist on a pro-albanian POV and anti-slavic and anti-greek polemic.--] (]) 10:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::Of course this source can't be used, since it has been decided that the article must be an albanian fiction. However, if you read Karl Hopf, which is a source in the article, citing John Musachi, you may see that Skanderbeg was ''''per natura Serviano'''" (born Serbian). (Karl Hopf, Reise durch die Gebiete des Drin und Wardar, 1867 p. 303, citing J.Musaki (who claimed that his is relative of Sk's family): |
|
Greeks are funny people ;D <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 15:26, 30 January 2019 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
"''Perche in Albania era entrato Scanderbeg uomo valente e per natura Serviano''" . Have a nice day. |
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks for the above. Otherwise some could think that anti-hellenism is only in my imagination.--] (]) 09:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC) |
|
:::Have you actually read Gjon Muzaka’s work? I’m pretty certain it’s free to read online. ] (]) 07:27, 28 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::''Per natura Serviano'', means "of a Serbian nature", or "Serbian character, disposition" (he was very tall, as Giuseppe Valentini has shown). Please do not distort the sources, or give them a meaning they do not have. If someone wanted to write ''born Serbian'' he would had used ''nato Serviano'' instead; please refer to . ] (]) 00:32, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
:A: "They're against me!" B: "Don't be silly!" A: "You see! He called me silly!" --] (]) 00:07, 1 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Any opinion on the topic? The name in Greek should be there or not, and why?--] (]) 12:54, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
::I was searching for "Gjon" + "Muzaka" but it didn't find anything. Can you paste the link here, please? However, I found Marinus Barletius' book and he doesn't mention any "Albanian" Georgius Castriotus. It doesn't even say that he was born somewhere in Albania.--] (]) 16:51, 30 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
::The Albanian name is in there because the figure of Skanderbeg is associated with Albania and Albanians. Unless you have not read the whole article, then this thread is the result.] (]) 18:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::Jokes aside, the memoirs of Giovanni Musachi is here, published by K. Hopf. Starts from p. 270. The "natura Serviano" is in p. 334. . Of course it's free. |
|
:This or similar questions are frequently asked by multiple editors for many years and deserve a proper reply based on consensus grounded in wikipedia rules. I have never seen such reply. I think nobody has ever presented a single convincing argument or criteria to add Sk's name on Albanian language into lede but not on Serbian or Greek language. Nine years ago there was a discussion about inclusion of Sk's name on Serbian or Greek language in the lede (]). At that time a small group of editors made up seven unconvincing specific and mutually exclusive and contradicting POV rules why Sk's name on Albanian language should be added to the lede and why Serbian and Greek language names should not. It might be a good idea to prepare some kind of Matrix with different langague names and arguments to determine the correct answer what language name should be present in the lede.--] (]) 16:41, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
::This goes to same for you too. The Albanian name is in there because the figure of Skanderbeg is associated with Albania and Albanians. Unless you have not read the whole article, then this thread is the result.] (]) 18:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Only after Myth of Skanderbeg was created about 100 years ago. On the other hand, George was associated with Slavs and their resistance to Ottomans centuries before 19th century Albanian nationalists decided to create Albanian nationalistic myth of poor Ђурађ. Still, thank you for unconvincing, specific, mutually exclusive and contradicting POV rules number eight ({{tq|associated with Albania and Albanians}}) and nine ({{tq|read the whole article}}). I will create a matrix and present it here as soon as I have some more time.--] (]) 20:34, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::You forget that Skanderbeg associated with the Arberesh community. They where Albanians (which included most of the Albanian aristocracy and other elite and a sizable chuck of the population) who fled while he was alive and after he died to southern Italy to escape the Ottoman wars and later conquest. The association has been with Albanians for a very long time. If you want to get specific about which Albanian communities kept his memory alive or was relevant to them, that's a different matter. Of course in the Balkans it was a different reality where his memory was forgotten and later reimported via the Arberesh during the Albanian national Awakening as a national symbol to generate unity etc. Among the Slavs he was a anti-Ottoman symbol for a time, they didn't bother to stick with him interestingly though like all the other types like in the nationalistic Kosovo Myth etc.] (]) 21:28, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::Yes, Slavs indeed associated themselves with Skanderbeg without making a nationalistic myth of him. This article is about historical Skanderbeg. Not about Myth of Skanderbeg. If this article would be about Myth of Skanderbeg, the addition of his name on Albanian or Arbereshe language would be justified because Slavs or Greeks never made a myth of him. {{U|Resnjari}}, can you please present written source for earliest mention of Skanderbeg on Arbereshe language?--] (]) 22:01, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::They never made a myth out of him? They used Skanderbeg as an anti-Ottoman symbol for their own purposes of "liberation from the Ottoman yoke" polemic. Anyway a few clarifications on Arberesh. The term Arbersh is a self appellation the old Albanian community uses in Southern Italy. Their Albanian dialect (not language) is called Arberisht. Both the words Arberesh and Arbersht are old words that Albanian speakers used for themselves and the language prior to the 18th century and has survived outside the Balkans until now in Southern Italy. Skanderbeg had survived as in oral memory among the Arberesh and at the 19th century it was from such sources and so on that Balkan Albanians borrowed him for their purposes (Blumi, p.43. ). Skendi also did a paper on this titled ''Skenderbeg and Albanian Consciousness'', 1968, pp. 83-84. deals with the Arberesh and their traditions about the man. The rest of the paper looks at how those traditions were taken up by Balkan Albanians of the National Awakening when transnational links between both communties transpired in the 1880s etc.] (]) 22:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::*{{U|Resnjari}}, are you able to present written source for earliest mention of Skanderbeg on ] or you want to say that in case of Skanderbeg wikipedia should make exemption and use oral instead of written sources? |
|
|
:::::::*The article about ] uses ''Gjergji'' (). Do you want to say that correct ] version of his name should be ''Gjergji'' instead of ''Gjergj'' version (used by people who only borrowed Skanderbeg and used him for their purposes)? --] (]) 22:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::::About Gjergj and Gjergji both forms work, as per Albanian phonetic rules depending on the context. If you spoke Albanian that should not be some gotcha moment. About the Arberesh, Skanderbeg's memory survived via oral means. This has been documented. I'll quote Skendi as i guess you might not have access to the source. pp.83-84: {{tq|The memory of the Albanian national hero was maintained vividly among the Albanians of Italy, those who emigrated to Calabria and Sicily, following his death. Among them, "during the wedding dinner", wrote A. Smilari toward the end of the last century, "guns are fired on every side, and songs are chanted, which recall the dinners of Skenderbeg". And the afternoon of Easter day, "The men and women dance separately, singing poems which bring to memory Skenderbeg and the fall of Albania under Turkish rule." Living compactly in Christian territory, though in separate communities, the Italo-Albanians have preserved the songs about Skenderbeg and his exploits which their ancestors had brought from the mother country. Today one may even speak of the existence of a Skenderbeg cycle among them, if one takes into account also the songs on other Albanian heroes who surrounded him. Different, however, was the situation in Albania proper.....}}] (]) 23:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::: Here you go - https://books.google.com/books/about/Early_Albania.html?id=_sHmTRCEe7kC - nowhere does it say in John’s original work that which you put above. Not only is Karl Hopf outdated, but he is incorrect in what he is saying. ] (]) 23:21, 30 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
The Greek chronicographers ], ] and ] are the first who mentioned Castriotis in their chronicles. Barletti in latin came almost a century later. Also, the Greeks produced an extended bibliography in Greek. Therefore, the name in Greek is of encyclopaedic interest. Don't worry. You don't "lose" him if the name is in Greek.--] (]) 10:59, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:::Karl Hopf has been accused of making a mess of his genealogies, or misreading documents, but I assure you he is not outdated. ] (]) 00:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Karl Hopf’s work from '''1867''' is outdated when it comes to the ethnicity of Skanderbeg’s family. We have much more recent sources that clearly state his paternal side was purely Albanian. ] (]) 01:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Karl Hopf published a documentary collection, called ''Chroniques gréco-romaines'', which as the name precisely states, is a collection of Greek-Roman chronicles; among these chronicles is the ''Breve Memoria'', or "Short Memoir" of Giovanni Musachi. Now, which part of Giovanni Musachi is outdated? I'm not sure if you are familiar with this work, of which you paste a link that shows what, precisely? ] (]) 17:57, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::A link to the up-to-date translation in a book by a Robert Elsie. ] (]) 20:52, 31 October 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::::{{ping|ShockedSkater}} Is this your first and only account? The statement ("natura Serviano") hasn't been written by Muzaka. It has been written by ] and Hopf accidentally included it in Muzaka's chronicle. ''Breve memoria'' is a medieval text which can be cited via reliable secondary sources, but not via Hopf.--] (]) 16:48, 1 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::::::Well it happens that the only edition we have is the one published by Hopf. Do you have any other reliable, secondary sources on the Breve Memoria, that can be cited via reliable sources, but not through Hopf? Because by publishing it, Hopf saved the Memoria; the original is lost, not to be found anywhere. |
|
|
::::::::Not my first, I had an account years ago, got disinterested with the project. Can't remember for sure right now. |
|
|
::::::::Do you have any sources that support the: "''The statement ("natura Serviano") hasn't been written by Muzaka. It has been written by ] and Hopf accidentally included it in Muzaka's chronicle''" statement ] (]) 16:39, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Is anybody else enjoying that K. Hopf is good for the article to claim that Sk's mother was Albanian (page?), but not good to cite Musachi that Sk was Serbian? Properly interpreted, all this says that both of Sk's parents were Serbians, and therefore if Musachi was Voisava's relative, he was also Serbian, unless we find Musachi quoting that Sk's mother was "Albanian". After that we can ask why "accidentally" one child was called Stanislav (Stanisha).--] (]) 21:23, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
:{{re|Skylax30}} Can you cite a WP policy stating that if there is literature concerning a person in a certain language, we should add his name in the WP article in that language? I am asking because I 'd like to add ]'s name in Chinese. ] (]) 11:14, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::Please tell me what "di natura Serviano" means, by "nature a Serbian", or by character, a Serbian, or by disposition, a Serbian, or he looked like Bosnians. If it read "di origine Serviano", "nato Serviano" that would be OK. That would mean he was born a Serb. Vojsava is Albanian because the link with her sister Agnese, the mother of ''Andrea Angeli'' is attested in other sources, that say the Angeli were nephews of Skanderbeg on his maternal side (Girolamo Angeli, or Paolo Angeli, Skanderbeg's trusted counselor and diplomat). Now, the Angeli are most definitely not Serbian, or having to do with the Brankovitch, they're Drivastine Catholics (from Drisht). It's either this, or that; you cannot possibly be Serbian on another side, beside your mother and father. Please see on the meaning of "natura" in Italian. For example: Forsi voi credete, o donna, che io consumato da molti anni, & ''per natura rozo'' - From: Michelangelo Biondo: "Angitia cortigiana" (Maybe you believe, o woman, that I, consumed from many years now, ''rough by nature''...). If you ask why "accidentally" one child was called Stanisha (sic!) and not Stanislav, I might accidentally add they were Pravoslav Orthodox in the beginning, then his father took the name Hamza (Amesa in Latin sources, Pope Pius). They were not Slavs, they were Pravoslavs of the Slavonic rite, the difference between which I'm sure you know and appreciate. ] (]) 22:14, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:::Wow, this is some science! So, Vojsava had not a sister called Mara Brankovich? And according to your "scientific" method, if Serbiano means Orthodox, all the supposed to be "Albanians" are so in what sense? |
|
::I suppose there will be no objection in adding a list with a famous man's name like Marx in Chinese, Korean and any other language. I don't know any WP rule that excludes this. After all, Marx and ''anarchists'' did not believe in nations, I think. But as an anarchist, you should know better. Alternatively, I can add a sub-paragraph with Greek bibliography on Castrioti, based on Titos Yohalas' book and others. Cheers. --] (]) 11:22, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:::@Skylax30, the article is not about ].] (]) 12:06, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::Or the Brankovich incident, when the Serbs blocked Skanderbeg the way so he did not join Hunyadi, because '''Brankovitch didn't want to mess up his good relations with the Turks'''. No mention is made of this fantastic origin from the Brankovich, for example, "Skanderbeg, who was related to Brankovich by way of his mother, told him etc. etc.". There are no hints whatsoever. The Brankovich origin is kind of ridiculous, Ivan Kastrioti's father '''owned only 2 villages''' in Dibra. If you were a Brankovich, that pretty much owned all Kosovo - a large swathe of the Balkans, would you give your daughter in marriage to a guy whose father Paul had only 2 villages? ] (]) 22:41, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
Sorry ], but I don't have time to "study" whatever you are suggesting. Stete here clearly what you don't like. I transferred to the "Myth of Sk." the paragraph of Rama. You may delete it from here. Where are the "primary sources"? --] (]) 12:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:I know that's the problem, you don't study, but POV push. Look either that article gets absorbed into here or its stays separate. We are not creating ]s all over the place.] (]) 12:29, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
::Adding an inaccurate and incorrect source from the 19th century is against ] and ]. It’s not even the Turkish/Islamic view, which is what you discussed in the initial comment on this thread. ] (]) 23:42, 2 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
::Don't bother responding to this nonsense {{u|Resnjari}}. Feeding it keeps the exhibit on display. --] (]) 04:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
:::What source are you talking about? ] (]) 01:08, 3 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Hopf's source. My comment was directed towards Skylax. ] (]) 02:12, 3 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::::{{ping|ShockedSkater}} Read Noli (1968) for details about the issue. The statement "natura Serviano" doesn't come from Gjon Muzaka, but from Spandounes.--] (]) 22:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::I think Spandounes/Spandugino wrote "natione Serviano". ] (]) 11:02, 11 November 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kosovo as an example is a Slavic name, all cities and landscapes, rivers and mountains in Kosovo have Slavic names - the Albanians have simply adopted these Slavic names and pronounce them Albanian. They don't even have their own names in Kosovo, let alone history and culture - yet they aggressively deny anything Slavic and Serbian in Kosovo today and claim that they have always been in Kosovo and have always been the majority of the population there - and don't even have their own names for the country. But Washington has decided on the project of an Albanian nation in Kosovo, which is why the memory of everything non-Albanian in Kosovo must be erased. It's easy to deal with foreign countries and cultures, it is not the own home. |
|
===... and why Albanian name is in LEAD?=== |
|
|
Any explanation why the Albanian name is coming after the english? Is the english name a transliteration of the Albanian? Point to the appropriate rule please.--] (]) 13:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:Because the figure of Skanderbeg is associated most with Albanians, hence the Albanian name is given in lede.] (]) 14:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The same applies to the Albanian national hero Skenderbeg, who was more Serb than Albanian by descent. His mother ] was Serbian, or at least Slavic (Bulgarian or Macedonian Slavic), and on his father's side the Serbian/Slavic proportion was also high. His father ] and his brother Reposh (sr. Repoš) were buried in the Serbian Orthodox monastery of Hilandar on the monastic republic of Athos. The most important monasteries there are and were Greek or Byzantine, but he wanted the Serbian monastery. Apparently his father Gjon identified himself with Serbs, and his mother was Serb/Slavic anyway. Their children, Skanderbeg's siblings, all have Serbian names. And all their children were given Serbian names, Skenderbeg alone was called Gjergj in Albanian. It's strange, not..? Or was Skednerbeg actually given the Serbian name Đurđ (dʑurdʑ) or Đurađ (dʑuradʑ), which became the Albanian Gjergj? |
|
] has an example: {{tq|*'''Cleopatra VII Philopator''' ({{lang-grc-gre|Κλεοπάτρα Φιλοπάτωρ}}; 69 – August 12, 30 BC), known to history simply as '''Cleopatra''', was the last active ruler of the ] of Egypt ...}} Have a look at Good Article ], it begins with {{tq|'''Alexander III of Macedon''' ({{lang-grc-gre|Αλέξανδρος Γ΄ ὁ Μακεδών}}; 20/21 July 356 BC – 10/11 June 323 BC), commonly known as '''Alexander the Great'''}}. Cheers mate. ] (]) 14:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The example is irrelevant. Cleopatra was called Κλεοπάτρα and Alexander was called Αλέξανδρος by his compatriots, and these are their names in the primary sources. It is true, though, that their names are somewhat different in modern Albanian. Cheers.--] (]) 14:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
Why is this such a nuisance for the Albanians, why can't they stand it and consider it the greatest national insult when Skenderbeg's Serbian or Slavic ancestry is mentioned in even the slightest way? Isn't that very racist? If we change Serb to Jew, what would we say? But they are Albanians, they are tolerated because the Albanian Kosovo project is to be realized.] (]) 23:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
:More ] views there. One hopes your editing is not steered by it.] (]) 14:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:His earliest recorded ancestor was Kostandin Kastriot Mazreku, given by Muzaka. PLEASE tell me what in the world Mazrek could mean in Serbian. They were buried in a Serbian Orthodox church, because an Albanian autocephalous church did not exist at the time. They had Serb names because obviously, the Serbian church baptized them. Why is the tower in which Gjon Kastrioti buried called "Arbanski Pirg"? Or will you leave such details and logic out, because you want to seem like you have a hidden history, buried under Albanian "propaganda". It's all just very humorous, considering the fact that your ethnicity would never even dare claim Skanderbeg up until a few years ago, because he was the hero of your worst enemy. It's all laughable. ] (]) 00:37, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
:{{re|Skylax30}} I thought ancient greek alphabet consisted only of capital letters. ] (]) 15:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:His father was originally Catholic as well. Go figure. For sure an Orthodox Serb, very proud of his ethnicity and nationality. The most powerful rulers around him were Serb lords. Obviously he would switch faiths for an alliance. You make it seem as if he was a nationalist, identifying with Serbia when his son campaigned into Serbia and feuded with the Brankovic ruler, who according to you all is from the same family as his mother. So according to your logic, a Catholic father, located in Albania, who gathered a mostly ethnic Albanian army and alliance around him, goes and invades his "Serb" mother's supposed relative, and is still a Serb. At this point it's become a literal joke. ] (]) 00:43, 29 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Albanians do not consider it a national insult because first of all the argument presented is ridiculous and laughable. In addition, the Albanian people are the most hospitable, generous, tolerant, and peace loving people in the entire Europe. Serbia sees that as a weakness and always attacks Albanians. Those are the reasons. ] (]) 01:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
::No. The ancient greek script was the Linear B.--] (]) 20:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is not the place to share Serb grievances. The article is about the Albanian hero Skanderbeg not about Serb grievances regarding what happened in Dardania 250 years ago, and please cite sources. Not a single source is cited. The names and people in Dardania 250 years ago might have been Slavonic, but today the people and the names in Dardania are 92.9% Albanians and deserve to live in peace and have their rights respected similar to every other European people. Speaking of Washington, the Serb police and military during the Dardania war of 1999 was among the most brutal in the entire history of mankind. In addition, Albanians have always wanted to live in peace and have accepted hundreds and thousands of concessions to make peace, but Serbs have never respected the deals because Serbs are not interested in peace but in wars. ] (]) 00:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
:::Seriously??? What is your definition of "Ancient Greek"? --] (]) 21:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Is There Evidence that Skanderbeg's Correspondences Were in Greek? == |
|
:::We are getting off-topic but I loled.] (]) 21:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is evidence that Skanderbeg, the national hero of Albania, sent and received his correspondences in Greek. Skanderbeg wrote letters to the Sultan and rulers of the West in Greek. |
|
::::Would it get back on topic if we write Skanderbeg in Linear B? <small>Sorry, couldn't resist!</small> --] (]) 21:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
] (]) 23:31, 19 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== If there is no evidence on Voisava Kastrioti being a part of the Branković family, why is it still written on this article? == |
|
:::::{{(-:}}] (]) 21:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is it okay if I remove it? ] (]) 21:18, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
== The article need an overhaul. Its got all sorts of WP:PRIMARY everywhere. == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Serbian sources of this article mention Skanderbeg as Serbian == |
|
The article need an overhaul. Its got all sorts of WP:PRIMARY everywhere (and content based on sources from the 19th century ! -]) and has a layout of original research. Its time to remove these and or replace it with secondary sources that mention certain aspects of the life of Skanderbeg.] (]) 12:08, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:Sources way over their use by date. Content should not be based on these and new scholarship has made either some of these redundant. Scholarship also can not ascertain for their accuracy. The following should go. Demetrio 1539, Miklosich 1858, Moore 1850, Thallóczy 1916, Noli 1947, Ljubić 1868–91, Jorga 1908–1913, Lane–Poole 1888, Gibbon 1901. I also came across this: Jacques 1995! This source is not even RS and should not be used in the body of the article at all.] (]) 12:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sources that are old or unreliable can be included in a section (or article) on the "Historiography on Sk.".--] (]) 12:25, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
Why are the sources used in this article in contradiction with each other? Why do they cite Skanderbeg as a Serbian while the article mentions him as Albanian? ] (]) 12:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
:They should not be in the body of the article. All of these are used for information in the article. Content based on these should not be there. If your talking about a further reading section that is different.] (]) 12:27, 5 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
::I think a few of these are okay, like some of the 1900s sources that are currently only being used for figures or mundane things like that.--] (]) 22:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I think its best that all of those get removed because it has the potential to open a Pandora's box for certain POV pushing editors (as the events of recent times have shown regarding this page). On sources from long ago the topic of Skanderbeg was written from either position of limited research or more patriotic and other similar elements. I don't mind having those old references replaced for a piece of info in the article with strong RS sources of the past few decades as a new ref source. Makes the article stronger in term of RS that way. Best.] (]) 22:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
::::It would be better if they could all get replaced, yeah. I've been removing some. Should I just leave extra cn tags on ones that if I remove, could cut useful stuff out of the article? --] (]) 23:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
|
:::::Do that with the tags, so like this editors will know what to address. Replacing takes a while due to locating RS scholarship and reading sources, especially this topic. Best.] (]) 23:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC) |
|
The article is almost exclusively presenting the western-albanian view on the subject. However, there is a good volume of islamic/ottoman historiography on Sk., claiming that the western is "propaganda". Of course the islamic historiography can also be characterized as "propaganda", but the spirit of WP is to present all views, so as to produce the famous "neutral p.o.v.". Would it be proper to open a section presenting the islamic (or pro-Ottoman / Turkish) point of view? Skylax30 (talk) 19:15, 22 October 2023 (UTC)
KOPAŃSKI, A. B. (1997). ISLAMIZATION OF ALBANIANS IN THE MIDDLE AGES: THE PRIMARY SOURCES AND THE PREDICAMENT OF THE MODERN HISTORIOGRAPHY. Islamic Studies, 36(2/3), 191–208. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23076194
Kosovo as an example is a Slavic name, all cities and landscapes, rivers and mountains in Kosovo have Slavic names - the Albanians have simply adopted these Slavic names and pronounce them Albanian. They don't even have their own names in Kosovo, let alone history and culture - yet they aggressively deny anything Slavic and Serbian in Kosovo today and claim that they have always been in Kosovo and have always been the majority of the population there - and don't even have their own names for the country. But Washington has decided on the project of an Albanian nation in Kosovo, which is why the memory of everything non-Albanian in Kosovo must be erased. It's easy to deal with foreign countries and cultures, it is not the own home.
The same applies to the Albanian national hero Skenderbeg, who was more Serb than Albanian by descent. His mother Voisava Kastrioti was Serbian, or at least Slavic (Bulgarian or Macedonian Slavic), and on his father's side the Serbian/Slavic proportion was also high. His father Gjon Kastrioti and his brother Reposh (sr. Repoš) were buried in the Serbian Orthodox monastery of Hilandar on the monastic republic of Athos. The most important monasteries there are and were Greek or Byzantine, but he wanted the Serbian monastery. Apparently his father Gjon identified himself with Serbs, and his mother was Serb/Slavic anyway. Their children, Skanderbeg's siblings, all have Serbian names. And all their children were given Serbian names, Skenderbeg alone was called Gjergj in Albanian. It's strange, not..? Or was Skednerbeg actually given the Serbian name Đurđ (dʑurdʑ) or Đurađ (dʑuradʑ), which became the Albanian Gjergj?
Why is this such a nuisance for the Albanians, why can't they stand it and consider it the greatest national insult when Skenderbeg's Serbian or Slavic ancestry is mentioned in even the slightest way? Isn't that very racist? If we change Serb to Jew, what would we say? But they are Albanians, they are tolerated because the Albanian Kosovo project is to be realized.Carski (talk) 23:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The Albanians do not consider it a national insult because first of all the argument presented is ridiculous and laughable. In addition, the Albanian people are the most hospitable, generous, tolerant, and peace loving people in the entire Europe. Serbia sees that as a weakness and always attacks Albanians. Those are the reasons. 2600:1700:36D0:9B0:D125:2D1:9542:CB94 (talk) 01:43, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
This is not the place to share Serb grievances. The article is about the Albanian hero Skanderbeg not about Serb grievances regarding what happened in Dardania 250 years ago, and please cite sources. Not a single source is cited. The names and people in Dardania 250 years ago might have been Slavonic, but today the people and the names in Dardania are 92.9% Albanians and deserve to live in peace and have their rights respected similar to every other European people. Speaking of Washington, the Serb police and military during the Dardania war of 1999 was among the most brutal in the entire history of mankind. In addition, Albanians have always wanted to live in peace and have accepted hundreds and thousands of concessions to make peace, but Serbs have never respected the deals because Serbs are not interested in peace but in wars. 2600:1700:36D0:9B0:6493:D35:2CE8:6F77 (talk) 00:25, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
Why are the sources used in this article in contradiction with each other? Why do they cite Skanderbeg as a Serbian while the article mentions him as Albanian? 93.86.237.151 (talk) 12:57, 26 November 2024 (UTC)