| Revision as of 04:18, 30 September 2023 editBill Williams (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,455 edits →BLPN discussion← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 23:46, 29 November 2024 edit undoBill Williams (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,455 edits Archiving previous discussionsTag: Replaced |
| (15 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Ds/aware|blp|ap|ab|cc|covid|gc|a-i|gg}} |
|
{{Ds/aware|blp|ap|ab|cc|covid|gc|a-i|gg}} |
|
{{Archives}} |
|
{{Archives}} |
|
|
|
|
== BLPN discussion == |
|
|
|
|
|
You may be interested in this discussion based on your comments in this old RfC . I'm not looking for a specific article level change rather a general opinion about situations like this. ] (]) 15:56, 23 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{u|Springree}} thanks for letting me know, I definitely would have joined the discussion but don't want to get you into any trouble with any overzealous editors who think you were trying to canvass. I fully agree that the label "far-right" should never be hyperlinked because it's a completely misleading term that American media likes to use, while the hyperlink leads to an article talking about Nazism and other far more extreme positions supporting literal genocide compared to the braindead American conspiracy theorists who are also called "far-right" but have expressed 0 support for murdering millions of people. ] 04:18, 30 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
