Revision as of 06:16, 5 March 2023 editAndyTheGrump (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers54,017 edits Proposed deletion - non-notableTag: Reverted← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 21:32, 1 December 2024 edit undoJJMC89 bot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Administrators3,695,714 editsm Moving Category:Animals and humans to Category:Human–animal interaction per Misplaced Pages:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 November 23#Category:Animals and humans |
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Proposed deletion/dated |
|
|
|concern = An article on a supposed 'emerging interdisciplinary academic field' apparently created by the field's sole proponent. No evidence of notability. Or as far as I can tell, even existence outside a single scolar's writings. |
|
|
|timestamp = 20230305061547 |
|
|
|nom = AndyTheGrump |
|
|
|help = |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{distinguish|Animal studies}} |
|
{{distinguish|Animal studies}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{Third-party|date=March 2023}} |
|
'''Animality studies''' is an emerging ] ] focused on the cultural study of ]s and animality. It can be distinguished from ] and critical animal studies by its resistance to ] or ] as an explicit justification for work in this field. According to Michael Lundblad, "If animal studies can be seen as work that explores representations of animality and related discourses with an emphasis on advocacy for nonhuman animals, animality studies becomes work that emphasizes the history of animality in relation to human ], without an explicit call for nonhuman advocacy."<ref name="Lundblad">Lundblad, Michael. "From Animal to Animality Studies." ''PMLA'' 124.2 (2009): 500.</ref> |
|
'''Animality studies''' is an emerging ] ] focused on the cultural study of ]s and animality. It can be distinguished from ] and critical animal studies by its resistance to ] or ] as an explicit justification for work in this field. According to Michael Lundblad, "If animal studies can be seen as work that explores representations of animality and related discourses with an emphasis on advocacy for nonhuman animals, animality studies becomes work that emphasizes the history of animality in relation to human ], without an explicit call for nonhuman advocacy."<ref name="Lundblad">Lundblad, Michael. "From Animal to Animality Studies." ''PMLA'' 124.2 (2009): 500.</ref> |
|
|
|
|
Line 19: |
Line 14: |
|
* |
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
] |