| Revision as of 06:01, 26 April 2007 editWJBscribe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,293 editsm fix unfortunate typo← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:06, 26 April 2007 edit undoCalton (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users78,494 edits →[]Next edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| * '''Comment''' during my "past editor notify", I saw this: , and I think Frederick may not be aware of how our notability, verifiability, etc., work, as it looks chock full of prod notices. ] 05:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | * '''Comment''' during my "past editor notify", I saw this: , and I think Frederick may not be aware of how our notability, verifiability, etc., work, as it looks chock full of prod notices. ] 05:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Keep'''. Firstly it should be noted that any COI issues arose ''after'' the creation of the article by ]. Although not definitive he gets and his work can be found on and as well as numerous other sites. He is apparently one of two founders of a notable NGO- ]. The article requires cleanup and more sources ''about'' FN but I think he just meets our criteria for inclusion. Also I note that the article's creator (]) is away until May and will be unable to comment in this discussion. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 05:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. Firstly it should be noted that any COI issues arose ''after'' the creation of the article by ]. Although not definitive he gets and his work can be found on and as well as numerous other sites. He is apparently one of two founders of a notable NGO- ]. The article requires cleanup and more sources ''about'' FN but I think he just meets our criteria for inclusion. Also I note that the article's creator (]) is away until May and will be unable to comment in this discussion. <span style="font-family: Verdana">]]</span> 05:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :*''a notable NGO- ]'' I'm seeing any sign in that article that it IS a notable NGO, since it doesn't have much in the way of reliable sources. Speaking of which, how about a few, just as evidence? It's not up to us to do your work for you. --] | ] 06:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
| *'''Delete''' unless actually reliably sourced, both this article and the ] article propping it up. --] | ] 06:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:06, 26 April 2007
Frederick Noronha
- Frederick Noronha (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
So far, I've counted problems with: Conflict of Interest (COI), Small business/organization (ORG), Use of self-published sources (SPS), and a general verifiability challenge (V). It might or might not be SNOW, I'll leave that to others to decide. Ronabop 05:21, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom. Gillyweed 05:47, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --ElKevbo 05:54, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Comment during my "past editor notify", I saw this: , and I think Frederick may not be aware of how our notability, verifiability, etc., work, as it looks chock full of prod notices. Ronabop 05:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Firstly it should be noted that any COI issues arose after the creation of the article by Nichalp. Although not definitive he gets 78,600 ghits and his work can be found on Google News and Find Articles as well as numerous other sites. He is apparently one of two founders of a notable NGO- BytesForAll. The article requires cleanup and more sources about FN but I think he just meets our criteria for inclusion. Also I note that the article's creator (Nichalp) is away until May and will be unable to comment in this discussion. WjBscribe 05:59, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- a notable NGO- BytesForAll I'm seeing any sign in that article that it IS a notable NGO, since it doesn't have much in the way of reliable sources. Speaking of which, how about a few, just as evidence? It's not up to us to do your work for you. --Calton | Talk 06:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless actually reliably sourced, both this article and the BytesForAll article propping it up. --Calton | Talk 06:06, 26 April 2007 (UTC)