| Revision as of 15:07, 28 August 2024 editSouthasianhistorian8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,293 edits →Deleted: ReplyTags: Reverted Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:40, 2 December 2024 edit undoScottishFinnishRadish (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Oversighters, Administrators61,106 edits notify of arbipa topic ban | ||
| (41 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban== | |||
| {{archives}} | |||
| {{Ivmbox | |||
| |2=Commons-emblem-hand.svg | |||
| |imagesize=50px | |||
| |1=The following ] now applies to you: | |||
| {{Talkquote|1=You are topic banned from India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, broadly construed for six months ''and'' 500 edits. This topic ban explicitly includes India's foreign relations and Sikhism.}} | |||
| == August 2024 == | |||
| You have been sanctioned as a result of . | |||
| ] Please stop. If you continue to assume ], as you did at ], you may be ]. Behavior such as this is regarded as ], and is a violation of Misplaced Pages policy.<!-- Template:uw-own3 --> | |||
| ] (]) 10:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an ] under the authority of the ]'s decision at ] and, if applicable, the ]. This sanction has been recorded in the ]. Please read ] to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may be ] for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions. | |||
| == August 2024 == | |||
| You may appeal this sanction using the process described ]. I recommend that you use the ] if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you.<!-- Template:AE sanction/topicban.--> ] (]) 12:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] Please stop. If you continue to assume bad faith when dealing with other editors, as you did at ], you may be ]. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Misplaced Pages. Comments such as, "Rv nonsense egregious pov pushing", do not follow these guidelines.<!-- Template:uw-agf3 --> ] (]) 10:39, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| }} | |||
| :@], I misread your version of the article and thought it said that Vaisakhi began in 1699. My apologies. ] (]) 19:38, 15 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Articles for deletion == | |||
| Hi @], can you check if these articles are ok for wikipedia or else nominate them for deletion ] (no sources), ] (3 sources that too unreliable), ] (single source is used), ] (no notablity, title too is invented) and ] and ] (no reliable history source used). I hope this would help regards. ] (]) 12:53, 19 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Deleted == | |||
| Hi, I've noticed the removal of your response to me. You've made baseless claims that I've used AI models *chuckle*. Considering I've made 10+ articles and been on here for 2.5 years, this is utterly hilarious and I am more than happy for you to bring Admins in and we can sort all these issues out. | |||
| Furthermore, you used heavy bias i.e. against the World Sikh Organisation through you're edits, which also led to you remove the content from the article of Anti-Sikh Sentiment in Canada which was really ridiculous. | |||
| You claim, I made things up with my sources ? Weirdly, it has only been yourself who has had an issue with my edits since my time on Misplaced Pages. Wiki articles I've created with hundreds of thousands of views but "I make up things with my sources". Even one of them which was nominated for deletion, was overwhelmingly voted in favour to keep. I suggest you take that outrageous comment back. | |||
| I am not saying what articles you can't or cannot edit, it's the specific association with Sikh articles and constant negative editing and un-justifiable editing which is of huge concern. | |||
| The issue and conflict is, you constantly made edits on Hinduism in Canada particularly to the section, "Attacks on Hindu community" in a favourable light. | |||
| We can put the issue the rest, if not lets sort through the admins and I'll present my evidence. | |||
| ] (]) 13:12, 25 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{tq|The Komagata Maru incident of 1914 is a poignant example of racial discrimination and xenophobia in early 20th-century Canada.}} | |||
| :{{tq|The Canadian government’s refusal to allow the ship’s passengers to land was a manifestation of the broader racial prejudices of the time. }} | |||
| :{{tq|acknowledging the grave injustices faced by the passengers and marking an official recognition '''of this dark chapter in Canadian history'''}} | |||
| :{{tq|During the mid-20th century, Sikhs in Canada faced pervasive racism and discrimination, '''reflecting the broader challenges of immigrant communities in a society''' that was often unwelcoming to visible minorities. Despite their contributions to the country,}} | |||
| :{{tq|This event was deeply intertwined with the broader context of anti-Sikh sentiment in Canada, where Sikhs, along with other South Asian immigrants, were subjected to racism, exclusionary immigration policies, and social marginalization.}} | |||
| :{{tq|These students have faced online harassment and discrimination, exacerbating their vulnerability and marginalization in Canadian society.}} | |||
| :{{tq|These instances underscore the persistent challenges Sikhs face in Canada, from historical prejudices to modern-day discrimination}} | |||
| :Who are you kidding? This is very obviously AI generated language. I'd be willing to bet good money that most others would agree. Happy to have admins examine this. | |||
| :In the section "1985 Air India Flight 182 aftermath", you falsely included claims of Sikh businesses being boycotted, and temples being targets of vandalism and arson- even though the source you provided made no such claim. | |||
| :, you falsely claimed that Transport Canada made offensive lyrics about Sikhs, even though the source you provided had zero mentions of the word "Sikh". | |||
| :Your original version of the article claimed that "More recently, anti-Sikh sentiment has surfaced on social media, particularly targeting international students from India." even though the sources you provided made no specific mentions or labels of anti Sikh sentiment. | |||
| :The original version of the article you made was poorly sourced, AI generated to a large extent, literally made incidents up, and inundated points that were not supported by sources. And instead of engaging with points on the talk page, you decided to harass me on my t/p and make personal attacks against me. If you have any reservations regarding my conduct, feel free to go to admins, if you have issues with my edits on the article, bring it up on the t/p there. ] (]) 15:07, 28 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:40, 2 December 2024
Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement topic ban
The following topic ban now applies to you:
You are topic banned from India, Pakistan and Afghanistan, broadly construed for six months and 500 edits. This topic ban explicitly includes India's foreign relations and Sikhism.
You have been sanctioned as a result of this AE report.
This topic ban is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at arbipa#Final decision and, if applicable, the contentious topics procedure. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. Please read WP:TBAN to understand what a topic ban is. If you do not comply with this topic ban, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything above is unclear to you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:40, 2 December 2024 (UTC)