Revision as of 09:14, 22 September 2023 edit2a00:23c6:1abe:fc01:c828:3d69:c979:19 (talk) →Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2023: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 08:12, 5 December 2024 edit undo2601:248:5181:5c70:1502:8587:7bb9:1a6f (talk) →Photo: ReplyTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Reply |
(47 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) |
Line 38: |
Line 38: |
|
|topic=Socsci|otd1date=2017-03-24|otd1oldid=771906205 |
|
|topic=Socsci|otd1date=2017-03-24|otd1oldid=771906205 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|blp=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|blp=yes|class=GA|vital=yes|listas=Irving, David|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes|class=GA|a&e-work-group=yes|a&e-priority=mid|listas=Irving, David}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|a&e-work-group=yes|a&e-priority=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Alternative Views|class=GA|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Alternative Views|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Crime|class=GA|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Journalism|class=GA|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Journalism|importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Skepticism|class=GA|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Skepticism|importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Military history|class=GA|Historiography-task-force=yes|WWII=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Military history|class=GA|Historiography-task-force=yes|WWII=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject England |class=GA |importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject England|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject East Anglia|importance=mid|Essex=yes|Essex-importance=mid}} |
|
{{Vital article|class=GA|level=5|topic=People|subpage=Pseudoscientists}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject History|importance=Mid}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{press|author=Cahal Milmo and Aline Nassif |date=25 April 2008 |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/legal-victory-for--bb-owner-who-evicted-irving-for-being-too-moody-815405.html |title=Legal victory for B&B owner who evicted Irving for being too moody |org=] |section=April 2008 |
|
{{press|author=Cahal Milmo and Aline Nassif |date=25 April 2008 |url=http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/legal-victory-for--bb-owner-who-evicted-irving-for-being-too-moody-815405.html |title=Legal victory for B&B owner who evicted Irving for being too moody |org=] |section=April 2008 |
Line 64: |
Line 65: |
|
{{section sizes}} |
|
{{section sizes}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Photo== |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't the photo used a bit too obviously propagandist? He looks mean and "in-your-face" and grumpy. Isn't this just a very basic, a very crude way of immediately portraying him as a villain? |
|
== Irving acknowledges gassings == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'd think the article- or the man's works themselves- would do a proper job of displaying him for, well, himself. Having an unflattering picture, while it works on "the plebs", will have the opposite effect on the sort of people who might actually bother reading him. |
|
Irving is no longer a "holocaust denier" proper. He now has this weird theory that a smaller number of people were murdered by gassing in every camp except for Auschwitz ] (]) 03:37, 9 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:Not sure about whether this claim about Irving is accurate or the details here, but he has long maintained that the scale of killings in the Holocaust was much smaller than was actually the case, and not that they didn't occur. Misrepresenting the scale of the Holocaust is a fairly common form of Holocaust denial (few deniers maintain that no Jews were murdered), and his aspect of his views was part of the reason that he was found to be a Holocaust denier in the libel action he launched (see ). ] (]) 06:34, 9 July 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How about finding a neutral picture? Something that doesn't bias the reader one way or the other? |
|
== Year of German atomic bomb book == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Sorry if my editing isn't proper; I very, very, very rarely engage in this sort of thing) |
|
{{edit semi-protected|answered=yes}} In the books section, please change the publication date of ''The German Atomic Bomb'' from 1983 to 1967. 1983 might be a later edition or just a reprint. Source: Nuel Pharr Davis, ''Lawrence and Oppenheimer'' (1969 British edition), bibliography section, p. 365. I guess at that time, Irving was still considered credible. ] (]) 07:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:{{done}}<!-- Template:EP --> ] (]) 22:10, 10 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
::<small>Marking as answered —⁠''']''' (] • ]) 03:26, 11 August 2023 (UTC)</small> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
I think I "sign" with three+ tilde signs? ] (]) 03:51, 11 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
==Shouldn’t this be British Court? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I honestly think it is neutral. ] (]) 08:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC) |
|
The English court found that Irving was an active Holocaust denier, antisemite and racist, who "for his own ideological reasons persistently and deliberately misrepresented and manipulated historical evidence". |
|
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
Kentish ] (]) 20:36, 17 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
:No. There is not a single court system in the UK, the ] are one system, Scotland has a totally different legal system and Northern Ireland has a third. As the case was tried in England it is correct to call it the English court. - ] (]) 21:06, 17 August 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 12 September 2023 == |
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 21 August 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|David Irving|answered=yes}} |
|
{{edit semi-protected|David Irving|answered=yes}} |
|
He is not a holocaust denier. He is the most prominent world war 2 historian. ] (]) 09:04, 12 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
Requires n doord comma. ] (]) 15:22, 21 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
*{{notdone}} -- the change you appear to want would be entirely inappropriate, not least because it is not supported by reliable sources. Thanks for your opinion, though. ] (]) 09:39, 12 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a ] and provide a ] if appropriate.<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 16:40, 21 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== uncited claim about divorce == |
|
|
|
|
|
In the article, it states that "Irving's affairs caused his first marriage to end in divorce in 1981." - but there is no citation. I think this should be removed as per ]. ] (]) 21:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== GA concerns == |
|
|
|
|
|
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the ]. Some of my concerns are listed below: |
|
|
|
|
|
*At over 11,000 words, ] suggests that it might be split up or summarised more effectively. |
|
|
*The article relies too much on block quotes: removing and summarising these will help reduce the article length. |
|
|
*There are many sources listed in the bibliography that are not used as inline citations: these should be considered for their inclusion or removed. |
|
|
*Some sections are too large and should be broken up with headings. |
|
|
|
|
|
Is anyone interested in fixing up this article, or should it go to ]? ] (]) 02:56, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
:I don't think the problem is as great as you lay out. The article is written well, and covers a lot of territory with appropriate detail. 156 kb isn't outlandishly big. ] says "the scope of a topic can sometimes justify the added reading material." |
|
:He is a holocaust denier in the most definitive way possible, declared as such by a court of law. ] (]) 09:14, 22 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
:The GA version in 2011 contained block quotes, too. The block quotes convey a great deal of information including Irving's deeply hateful tone, which would disappear if summarized. |
|
|
:Feel free to reduce the bibliography. ] (]) 03:52, 9 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{re|Binksternet}} Sorry I did not respond to this sooner: I missed it on my watchlist. Responses below |
|
|
::*I do not think the scope of this topic can justify the length: if there were already attempts to ] the article, I could agree with this, but this article has not done so yet so I do not think all of this information should stay here. |
|
|
::*Regarding block quotes: ] says we should not be making interpretations of the work. Instead, Misplaced Pages should be presenting what secondary sources have said about the topic. If the block quotes "convey a great deal of information including Irving's deeply hateful tone" then it should be presented from secondary sources. Also, direct quotes might bring copyright concerns if done too often, which is why I recommend using them sparingly and summarising the information instead. |
|
|
::Would you be interested in addressing these concerns, or should this go to ] to get additional opinions? ] (]) 22:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Do whatever you think is right. I think the GAR process will unnecessarily waste the community's time. For 14 years now, the article has contained a bunch of blockquotes. had 1,162 words worth of blockquotes. The previous GAR attempt (archived at ]) was a biased attempt to whitewash the article resulting in affirmation of the GA status. The article has been improved bit by bit for more than a decade, and represents standing consensus on the topic. I don't think a new GAR is necessary. ] (]) 22:50, 23 October 2024 (UTC) |
Isn't the photo used a bit too obviously propagandist? He looks mean and "in-your-face" and grumpy. Isn't this just a very basic, a very crude way of immediately portraying him as a villain?
I'd think the article- or the man's works themselves- would do a proper job of displaying him for, well, himself. Having an unflattering picture, while it works on "the plebs", will have the opposite effect on the sort of people who might actually bother reading him.
How about finding a neutral picture? Something that doesn't bias the reader one way or the other?
(Sorry if my editing isn't proper; I very, very, very rarely engage in this sort of thing)
In the article, it states that "Irving's affairs caused his first marriage to end in divorce in 1981." - but there is no citation. I think this should be removed as per WP:BLP. 45.178.73.82 (talk) 21:02, 8 September 2024 (UTC)