| Revision as of 23:14, 8 March 2006 edit24.137.90.147 (talk) →not neutral: Java centric.← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 20:28, 6 December 2024 edit undoBrunnock (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,345 edits Restored revision 1227536384 by Curb Safe Charmer (talk): Reverting junkTags: Twinkle Undo |
| (136 intermediate revisions by 76 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
As someone who is shopping for, and consequently bewildered by, web portal software on the less than corporate enterprise level, I find this article inadequate in that it does not address this wide array of software that is out there, nor is there a link or disambiguation to these other forms (soopportal.org, web wiz forums, maxwebportal extreme, etc) of web portal. I would glady do an article myself, but clearly I'm not ready. I, and I suspect others, need someone more knowledgeable to at least start the ball rolling here. Please? Thanx. :-)] 18:54, 19 October 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C| |
|
|
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Websites|importance=High}} |
|
Think of "portal" as a BS marketing term that doesn't really mean much of anything. Does that help? |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Internet|importance=High}} |
|
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
== not neutral: Java centric. == |
|
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|
|
|
| algo=old(90d) |
|
This is a well writen article but it is Java centric. What a web portal is should not be defined by the implementation of a portal in Java. I love Java but mentions of it should be in a links section or an example section. |
|
|
|
| archive=Talk:Web portal/Archive %(counter)d |
|
] 13:13, 23 November 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| counter=1 |
|
:I find no point-of-view asserted here. Please see ] regarding the use of the <nowiki>{{NPOV}}</nowiki> tag. If it being Java centric is concerned, then I invite you to expand the article to cover portals made in other languages. Thanks! -- ] ] 01:34, 24 November 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| maxarchivesize=75K |
|
::If the no point-of-view policy is about unbiased articles, then your correction is not good. The article is biased towards only one technology, implying that a web portal can only be made from Java technologies. The article should be language neutral in defining what a portal is. I will take you up on your invitation and see if I can write something acceptable. I know it is not an easy thing. I will see about it over the weekend.-- ] 13:07, 24 November 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
| archiveheader={{Automatic archive navigator}} |
|
|
|
|
|
| minthreadsleft=5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| minthreadstoarchive=2 |
|
I'm a developer. Any room for my opinion? |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Official statement from a student of Jakob Nielsen == |
|
|
|
|
|
* A 'portal' refers to a location on the World Wide Web while a 'Wikiportal' should refer to 'Wikiportals' here on Misplaced Pages. The 'portal' use confuses users. Let us clarify this as soon as possible. I suggest 'portal' designers begin their conversion to 'wikiportal' immediately. I should know. Like Al Gore, I built the Internet. Ha! Anyway, I have started the switch to Wikiportals with the new ] which you can find here ''Sincerely, ] 22:39, 3 December 2005 (UTC)'' |
|
|
* |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
==Vortal?== |
|
|
|
|
|
'''Vortal''' redirects here. What is a vortal? The word doesn't occur here even though it redirects here. ] 17:11, 11 January 2006 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Vortal was, for a short time in the 90s, used to describe a "vertical portal". I don't know if any of those still exists, but the idea was to gather links to businesses in a certain field and maybe let them share information with each other. --] 13:44, 12 January 2006 (UTC) |
|
.svg){kind=icon}
