Misplaced Pages

Dogma: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 10:09, 11 August 2003 editKoyaanis Qatsi (talk | contribs)13,445 edits re-removing irrelevance← Previous edit Latest revision as of 17:00, 7 December 2024 edit undoAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,575,348 editsm Substing templates: {{Format ISBN}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info. 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Belief(s) accepted by members of a group without question}}
] ]
{{About|established beliefs, doctrines or sets of theological or philosophical tenets|other uses}}


'''Dogma''', in its broadest sense, is any belief held definitively and without the possibility of reform. It may be in the form of an official system of ]s or ]s of a ], such as ], ], ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05089a.htm|title=Dogma|website=New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia|access-date=5 October 2016|archive-date=5 June 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220605133144/https://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05089a.htm|url-status=live}}</ref> or ], the ] of a philosopher or ], such as ], and political belief systems such as ], ], ], ], and ].<ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/22/yes-liberal-democracy-is-struggling-progressive-left-isnt-helping/|title=Yes, liberal democracy is struggling, and the progressive left isn't helping|newspaper=]|access-date=16 January 2021|archive-date=22 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210122085113/https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/22/yes-liberal-democracy-is-struggling-progressive-left-isnt-helping/|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/09/challenging-the-dogmas-of-right-and-left/540093/|title=Challenging the Dogmas of Right and Left|website=]|date=18 September 2017 |access-date=16 January 2021|archive-date=17 January 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210117011431/https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/09/challenging-the-dogmas-of-right-and-left/540093/|url-status=live}}</ref>
Typically in ] ], but generally in other religions' theologies too, a '''dogma''' is an absolute theological foundation, that must be strictly held as an indisputable principle in order to be a faithful follower of that religion.


In the ] sense, dogma refers to enforced decisions, such as those of aggressive political interests or authorities.<ref>{{cite web|url = http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dogma|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220729014435/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/dogma|archive-date=2022-07-29|title =dogma|work = Merriam-Webster.com |publisher= Encyclopædia Britannica Company, Inc. }}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dogma|title=Dogma|website=dictionary.com|access-date=4 October 2016|archive-date=23 September 2016|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160923025608/http://www.dictionary.com/browse/dogma|url-status=live}}</ref> More generally, it is applied to some strong belief that its adherents are not willing to discuss rationally. This attitude is named as a dogmatic one, or dogmatism, and is often used to refer to matters related to religion, though this pejorative sense strays far from the formal sense in which it is applied to religious belief. The pejorative sense is not limited to theistic attitudes alone and is often used with respect to political or philosophical dogmas.
Dogma eminently distinguishes itself from theological opinions, or beliefs, about which the faithful are free to disagree, for its absolute character; as a fundamental part of the religion, it cannot be disputed, revised or otherwise doubted, but has to be respected by faith. However, dogmas can be discussed and even expanded upon, provided that doing so doesn't overturn or contradict the original teaching. The disagreement on dogmas is ] and usually leads to the expulsion of the heretics from the religious group.


==Etymology==
The specific beliefs on dogmas and their sources, can considerably vary among religious groups. For most of ], the dogmas are contained in the ] and the first two, three, or seven ]s (depending on whether one is a Nestorian, a Monophysite, or an Eastern Orthodox Christian). ] may also affirm these, but often rely on a "Statement of Faith" which summarizes their dogmas, drawn up by their individual denomination.
{{seealso|Doxa}}
The word ''dogma'' was adopted in the 17th century from {{langx|la|dogma||philosophical tenet or principle}}, derived from the {{langx|grc|]|]|opinion, belief, judgement}} from the {{langx|grc|]|dokeî|it seems that...}}. The plural is based on the {{langx|la|]}}, though '']'' may be more commonly used in English.


==In philosophy==
The term '''dogma''' has been imported in ] too, where it stands for a concept that expresses a substantial element of the ideological referring doctrine. Often, but not exclusively, said of the established ] of a political ], in the journalistic jargon.
=== Pyrrhonism ===
{{Pyrrhonism sidebar}}
In ], "dogma" refers to assent to a proposition about a non-evident matter.<ref>Sextus Empiricus, 'Outlines of Pyrrhonism', I. 13.</ref> The main principle of Pyrrhonism is expressed by the word '']'', which connotes the ability to withhold assent from doctrines regarding the truth of ]; against every statement its contradiction may be advanced with equal justification. Consequently, Pyrrhonists withhold assent with regard to non-evident propositions, i.e., dogmas.<ref>Sextus Empiricus, 'Outlines of Pyrrhonism', I. 14.</ref> Pyrrhonists argue that dogmatists, such as the ], ], and ], have failed to demonstrate that their doctrines regarding non-evident matters are true.


==In religion==
It is commonly used, in everyday speech (even about politics), to indicate a fact that is considered absolutely ] by its believers, without thought to its accuracy or relevance or to different opinions on the same subject, particularly where the "dogma" is long established within a group or organisation.
=== Christianity ===
In Christianity, a ''dogma'' is a belief communicated by divine revelation and defined by the Church,{{sfn|Blackburn|2016|p=139}} The organization's formal religious positions may be taught to new members or simply communicated to those who choose to become members. It is rare for agreement with an organization's formal positions to be a requirement for attendance, though membership may be required for some church activities.{{sfn|Blackburn|2016|p=139}}


In the narrower sense of the church's official interpretation of divine revelation,{{sfn|Stanglin|2009|p=240}} theologians distinguish between defined and non-defined dogmas, the former being those set out by authoritative bodies such as the Roman Curia for the Catholic Church, the latter being those which are universally held but have not been officially defined, the nature of Christ as universal redeemer being an example.{{sfn|O'Collins|1983|pp=162–163}} The term originated in late Greek philosophy legal usage, in which it meant a decree or command, and came to be used in the same sense in early Christian theology.{{sfn|McKim|2001|p=350}} ] to differing degrees are less formal about doctrine, and often rely on denomination-specific beliefs, but seldom refer to these beliefs as dogmata. The first{{cn|date=January 2023}} unofficial institution of dogma in the Christian church was by ] in his ''Demonstration of Apostolic Teaching'', which provides a 'manual of essentials' constituting the 'body of truth'.
----


==== Catholicism and Eastern Christianity ====
'''Dogma''' is also the name of a ] band. Their site is .
{{main|Dogma in the Catholic Church}}
For ] and ], the dogmata are contained in the ] and the ]s of two, three, seven, or twenty ]s (depending on whether one is ], ], ], or ]). These tenets are summarized by ] in his ''Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith'', which is the third book of his main work, titled ''The Fount of Knowledge''. In this book he takes a dual approach in explaining each article of the faith: one, directed at Christians, where he uses quotes from the ] and, occasionally, from works of other ], and the second, directed both at members of non-Christian religions and at ]s, for whom he employs ] and ].


The decisions of fourteen later councils that Catholics hold as dogmatic and a small number of decrees promulgated by ]s exercising ] (for examples, see ] and ]) are considered as being a part of the Catholic Church's sacred body of doctrine.
----


=== Judaism ===
''''']''''' is also the name of a movie comedy, directed and with screenplay by ], starring amongst others ] as a ], ] as ], and ] and ] as a duo of ]s. It caused much controversy in many countries, as well as resulting in a death threat for Smith.
In the Jewish commentary tradition, ''dogma'' is a principle by which the ] can try the proofs of faith about the existence of God and truth;<ref>], ]</ref> ''dogma'' is what is necessarily true for rational thinking.<ref>"Fons Vitae" of ]</ref> In Jewish ], a ''dogma'' is an '']'' of the ] or ''Torah Nistar'', the secrets of Bible. In the relation between "logical thinking" and "rational Kabbalah" the "]" is the means to identify "dogma".{{clarify|date=January 2023}}
===Buddhism===
{{main|View (Buddhism)}}
] or position ({{langx|sa|दृष्टि|dṛṣṭi|translit-std=IAST}}; {{langx|pi-Latn|diṭṭhi|translit-std=IAST}}) is a central idea in ] that corresponds with the Western notion of dogma.{{sfn|Fuller|2005|page=1}} In Buddhist thought, a view is not a simple, abstract collection of propositions, but a charged interpretation of experience which intensely shapes and affects thought, sensation, and action.<ref name="Lusthaus 2002">{{cite book|first=Dan|last=Lusthaus|title=Buddhist Phenomenology|url=http://www.khamkoo.com/uploads/9/0/0/4/9004485/buddhist_phenomenology_-_a_pholosophical_investigation_of_yogacara_buddhism_and_the_cheng_wei-shih_lun.pdf|publisher=Routledge|year=2002|page=242, n. 46|access-date=2018-08-27|archive-date=2020-02-19|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200219223250/http://www.khamkoo.com/uploads/9/0/0/4/9004485/buddhist_phenomenology_-_a_pholosophical_investigation_of_yogacara_buddhism_and_the_cheng_wei-shih_lun.pdf}}</ref> Having the proper mental attitude toward views is therefore considered an integral part of the Buddhist path, as sometimes correct views need to be put into practice and incorrect views abandoned, while at other times all views are seen as obstacles to enlightenment.{{sfn|Fuller|2005|pages=1–2}}


=== Islam ===
----
{{Main|Taqlid}}
Taqlid ({{langx|ar|تَقْليد|taqlīd}}) is a term in Islam that refers to conforming to the teachings of a particular person. Classical usage of the term differs between ] and ]. In Sunni Islam, taqlid refers to the unjustified conformity to the teachings of a person without inquiring or thinking about said teachings, rather than the justified conformity of a layperson to the teaching of '']'' (a person who is qualified for independent reasoning). In Shia Islam, taqlid refers to the general conformity of non-''mujtahid'' to the teaching of ''mujtahid'', without a negative connotation. The discrepancy corresponds to differing views on ] and ]. Taqlid can be seen as a form of dogma, as no particular scholar can always be correct, so their rulings should not be taken uncritically.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Imitation (taqleed), following the evidence (daleel) – and was Ibn Hazm a Hanbali? |url=https://islamqa.info/en/answers/23280/imitation-taqleed-following-the-evidence-daleel-and-was-ibn-hazm-a-hanbali |website=islamqa.org |quote="No one has the right to follow an imam blindly and never accept anything but his worlds. Rather what he must do is accept that which is in accordance with the truth, whether it is from his imam or anyone else."}}</ref>


==See also==
''']''' is the name for the manifesto about filmmaking aesthetics, made initially in ] in 1995 by four directors: ], ], ], and ].
* {{annotated link|Axiom}}
* {{annotated link|Central dogma of molecular biology}}
* {{annotated link|Doctrine#Religious usage}}
* {{annotated link|Dogmatic theology}}
* {{annotated link|Escalation of commitment}}
* ] – Confidence or trust, often characterized as without evidence
* {{annotated link|Pseudoskepticism}}
* {{annotated link|Standard social science model}}

==References==
{{Reflist}}

==Bibliography==
* {{cite book
| last1 = Blackburn
| first1 = Simon
| chapter = Dogma
| title = The Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy
| publisher = Oxford University Press
| year = 2016
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=Mno8CwAAQBAJ
| isbn = 978-0-19-873530-4
}}
* {{cite book |first=Paul |last=Fuller |title=The Notion of Diṭṭhi in Theravāda Buddhism: The Point of View |url=http://www.ahandfulofleaves.org/documents/The%20Notion%20of%20Ditthi%20in%20Theravada%20Buddhism_Fuller.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150226092537/http://ahandfulofleaves.org/documents/The%20Notion%20of%20Ditthi%20in%20Theravada%20Buddhism_Fuller.pdf |archive-date=February 26, 2015 |publisher=Routledge |year=2005}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = McKim
| first1 = D.K.
| chapter = Dogma
| editor1-last = Elwell
| editor1-first = Walter A.
| title = Evangelical Dictionary of Theology
| publisher = Baker Academic
| year = 2001
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=yu846j61u0wC
| isbn = 978-0-8010-2075-9
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = O'Collins
| first1 = Gerald
| chapter = Dogma
| editor1-last = Richardson
| editor1-first = Alan
| editor2-last = Bowden
| editor2-first = John
| title = The Westminster Dictionary of Christian Theology
| publisher = Westminster John Knox Press
| year = 1983
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=PN7UMUTBBPAC
| isbn = 978-0-664-22748-7
}}
* {{cite book
| last1 = Stanglin
| first1 = K.D.
| chapter = Dogma
| editor1-last = Dyrness
| editor1-first = William A.
| editor2-last = Kärkkäinen
| editor2-first = Veli-Matti
| title = Global Dictionary of Theology: A Resource for the Worldwide Church
| publisher = InterVarsity Press
| year = 2009
| url = https://books.google.com/books?id=ncqkZnDSeo4C
| isbn = 978-0-8308-7811-6
}}

==External links==
{{Wiktionary}}
{{wikiquote}}
{{CE1913 poster|Dogma}}
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070213061957/http://bible.crosswalk.com/Lexicons/Greek/grk.cgi?number=1378&version=kjv |date=2007-02-13 }} – ] N.T. Greek Lexicon
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140926002219/http://www.enricomariaradaelli.it/aureadomus/convivium/convivium_domani_del_dogma.html |date=2014-09-26 }}, a book by Enrico Maria Radaelli with a Preface by Roger Scruton and comments by Brunero Gherardini, Alessandro Gnocchi-Mario Palmaro, and Mario Oliveri (Roma 2012)
* Irenaeus. ''Demonstration of the Apostolic Preaching''. pp.&nbsp;70–75. available at: Christian Classics ethereal library

{{Conformity}}
{{Authority control}}

]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 17:00, 7 December 2024

Belief(s) accepted by members of a group without question This article is about established beliefs, doctrines or sets of theological or philosophical tenets. For other uses, see Dogma (disambiguation).

Dogma, in its broadest sense, is any belief held definitively and without the possibility of reform. It may be in the form of an official system of principles or doctrines of a religion, such as Judaism, Roman Catholicism, Protestantism, or Islam, the positions of a philosopher or philosophical school, such as Stoicism, and political belief systems such as fascism, socialism, progressivism, liberalism, and conservatism.

In the pejorative sense, dogma refers to enforced decisions, such as those of aggressive political interests or authorities. More generally, it is applied to some strong belief that its adherents are not willing to discuss rationally. This attitude is named as a dogmatic one, or dogmatism, and is often used to refer to matters related to religion, though this pejorative sense strays far from the formal sense in which it is applied to religious belief. The pejorative sense is not limited to theistic attitudes alone and is often used with respect to political or philosophical dogmas.

Etymology

See also: Doxa

The word dogma was adopted in the 17th century from Latin: dogma, lit.'philosophical tenet or principle', derived from the Ancient Greek: δόγμα, romanizeddogma, lit.'opinion, belief, judgement' from the Ancient Greek: δοκεῖ, romanizeddokeî, lit.'it seems that...'. The plural is based on the Latin: dogmata, though dogmas may be more commonly used in English.

In philosophy

Pyrrhonism

Part of a series on
Pyrrhonism
Pyrrhonists
Concepts
Similar philosophies
Modern influence
Philosophy portal

In Pyrrhonism, "dogma" refers to assent to a proposition about a non-evident matter. The main principle of Pyrrhonism is expressed by the word acatalepsia, which connotes the ability to withhold assent from doctrines regarding the truth of things in their own nature; against every statement its contradiction may be advanced with equal justification. Consequently, Pyrrhonists withhold assent with regard to non-evident propositions, i.e., dogmas. Pyrrhonists argue that dogmatists, such as the Stoics, Epicureans, and Peripatetics, have failed to demonstrate that their doctrines regarding non-evident matters are true.

In religion

Christianity

In Christianity, a dogma is a belief communicated by divine revelation and defined by the Church, The organization's formal religious positions may be taught to new members or simply communicated to those who choose to become members. It is rare for agreement with an organization's formal positions to be a requirement for attendance, though membership may be required for some church activities.

In the narrower sense of the church's official interpretation of divine revelation, theologians distinguish between defined and non-defined dogmas, the former being those set out by authoritative bodies such as the Roman Curia for the Catholic Church, the latter being those which are universally held but have not been officially defined, the nature of Christ as universal redeemer being an example. The term originated in late Greek philosophy legal usage, in which it meant a decree or command, and came to be used in the same sense in early Christian theology. Protestants to differing degrees are less formal about doctrine, and often rely on denomination-specific beliefs, but seldom refer to these beliefs as dogmata. The first unofficial institution of dogma in the Christian church was by Saint Irenaeus in his Demonstration of Apostolic Teaching, which provides a 'manual of essentials' constituting the 'body of truth'.

Catholicism and Eastern Christianity

Main article: Dogma in the Catholic Church

For Catholicism and Eastern Christianity, the dogmata are contained in the Nicene Creed and the canon laws of two, three, seven, or twenty ecumenical councils (depending on whether one is Church of the East, Oriental Orthodox, Eastern Orthodox, or Roman Catholic). These tenets are summarized by John of Damascus in his Exact Exposition of the Orthodox Faith, which is the third book of his main work, titled The Fount of Knowledge. In this book he takes a dual approach in explaining each article of the faith: one, directed at Christians, where he uses quotes from the Bible and, occasionally, from works of other Church Fathers, and the second, directed both at members of non-Christian religions and at atheists, for whom he employs Aristotelian logic and dialectics.

The decisions of fourteen later councils that Catholics hold as dogmatic and a small number of decrees promulgated by popes exercising papal infallibility (for examples, see Immaculate Conception and Assumption of Mary) are considered as being a part of the Catholic Church's sacred body of doctrine.

Judaism

In the Jewish commentary tradition, dogma is a principle by which the Rabbanim can try the proofs of faith about the existence of God and truth; dogma is what is necessarily true for rational thinking. In Jewish Kabbalah, a dogma is an archetype of the Pardes or Torah Nistar, the secrets of Bible. In the relation between "logical thinking" and "rational Kabbalah" the "Partzuf" is the means to identify "dogma".

Buddhism

Main article: View (Buddhism)

View or position (Sanskrit: दृष्टि, romanizeddṛṣṭi; Pali: diṭṭhi) is a central idea in Buddhism that corresponds with the Western notion of dogma. In Buddhist thought, a view is not a simple, abstract collection of propositions, but a charged interpretation of experience which intensely shapes and affects thought, sensation, and action. Having the proper mental attitude toward views is therefore considered an integral part of the Buddhist path, as sometimes correct views need to be put into practice and incorrect views abandoned, while at other times all views are seen as obstacles to enlightenment.

Islam

Main article: Taqlid

Taqlid (Arabic: تَقْليد, romanizedtaqlīd) is a term in Islam that refers to conforming to the teachings of a particular person. Classical usage of the term differs between Sunni Islam and Shia Islam. In Sunni Islam, taqlid refers to the unjustified conformity to the teachings of a person without inquiring or thinking about said teachings, rather than the justified conformity of a layperson to the teaching of mujtahid (a person who is qualified for independent reasoning). In Shia Islam, taqlid refers to the general conformity of non-mujtahid to the teaching of mujtahid, without a negative connotation. The discrepancy corresponds to differing views on Shia views on the Imamate and Sunni imams. Taqlid can be seen as a form of dogma, as no particular scholar can always be correct, so their rulings should not be taken uncritically.

See also

References

  1. "Dogma". New Advent Catholic Encyclopedia. Archived from the original on 5 June 2022. Retrieved 5 October 2016.
  2. "Yes, liberal democracy is struggling, and the progressive left isn't helping". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on 22 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  3. "Challenging the Dogmas of Right and Left". The Atlantic. 18 September 2017. Archived from the original on 17 January 2021. Retrieved 16 January 2021.
  4. "dogma". Merriam-Webster.com. Encyclopædia Britannica Company, Inc. Archived from the original on 2022-07-29.
  5. "Dogma". dictionary.com. Archived from the original on 23 September 2016. Retrieved 4 October 2016.
  6. Sextus Empiricus, 'Outlines of Pyrrhonism', I. 13.
  7. Sextus Empiricus, 'Outlines of Pyrrhonism', I. 14.
  8. ^ Blackburn 2016, p. 139.
  9. Stanglin 2009, p. 240.
  10. O'Collins 1983, pp. 162–163.
  11. McKim 2001, p. 350.
  12. Joseph Albo, Sefer HaIkkarim
  13. "Fons Vitae" of Solomon ibn Gabirol
  14. Fuller 2005, p. 1.
  15. Lusthaus, Dan (2002). Buddhist Phenomenology (PDF). Routledge. p. 242, n. 46. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2020-02-19. Retrieved 2018-08-27.
  16. Fuller 2005, pp. 1–2.
  17. "Imitation (taqleed), following the evidence (daleel) – and was Ibn Hazm a Hanbali?". islamqa.org. No one has the right to follow an imam blindly and never accept anything but his worlds. Rather what he must do is accept that which is in accordance with the truth, whether it is from his imam or anyone else.

Bibliography

External links

Conformity
Enforcement
Proscription
Governmental pressure
Group pressure
Individual pressure
Conformity
Experiments
Anticonformity
Categories: