Misplaced Pages

Talk:Emily Prentiss: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:33, 26 January 2012 edit66.87.0.86 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 05:14, 18 December 2024 edit undoDocZach (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users961 editsNo edit summary 
(12 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi |date=24 September 2023 |result='''Redirect''' |page=Emily Prentiss |date2=24 November 2024 |result2='''No consensus''' |page2=Emily Prentiss (2nd nomination)}}
⚫ {{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=Start}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|

⚫ {{WikiProject Fictional characters}}
}}
== Old Discussion ==
Absolutely not! There is no need to move this article! There's enough info about the character, and it would be a pain to add stuff on. Leave the article where it is! Besides, I would like to add info on how the character was created. ] (]) 23:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC) Absolutely not! There is no need to move this article! There's enough info about the character, and it would be a pain to add stuff on. Leave the article where it is! Besides, I would like to add info on how the character was created. ] (]) 23:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
:Most of this article should be deleted as original research... the referenced episodes are not valid citations. "''Do not analyze, synthesize, interpret, or evaluate material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so''" (from ]) ] (]) 03:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC) :Most of this article should be deleted as original research... the referenced episodes are not valid citations. "''Do not analyze, synthesize, interpret, or evaluate material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so''" (from ]) ] (]) 03:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
::] ] (]) 13:36, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

== Why is this article up for deletion? ==

Apart from the character not being notable, I do not see why it is up for deletion. The article is well written and maintained. Might want to change out the sources as using an episode as a source is not meeting wiki’s standards based on what I know. But sources are not hard to change out. ] (]) 05:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

:You basically hit the nail on the head with your statement of {{tq|character not being notable}} which is a requirement, however, if you want to participate in the discussion you’re welcome to talk about it over at ]. ] ] 05:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 05:14, 18 December 2024

Articles for deletionThis article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
This article is rated Start-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconFictional characters
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character

Old Discussion

Absolutely not! There is no need to move this article! There's enough info about the character, and it would be a pain to add stuff on. Leave the article where it is! Besides, I would like to add info on how the character was created. 71.202.132.106 (talk) 23:56, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Most of this article should be deleted as original research... the referenced episodes are not valid citations. "Do not analyze, synthesize, interpret, or evaluate material found in a primary source yourself; instead, refer to reliable secondary sources that do so" (from WP:PSTS) 66.87.0.86 (talk) 03:33, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
@66.87.0.86 107.115.243.56 (talk) 13:36, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Why is this article up for deletion?

Apart from the character not being notable, I do not see why it is up for deletion. The article is well written and maintained. Might want to change out the sources as using an episode as a source is not meeting wiki’s standards based on what I know. But sources are not hard to change out. SylviaSNA (talk) 05:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

You basically hit the nail on the head with your statement of character not being notable which is a requirement, however, if you want to participate in the discussion you’re welcome to talk about it over at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Emily Prentiss (2nd nomination). TiggerJay (talk) 05:53, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
Categories: