Revision as of 14:12, 5 May 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,299,780 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Archive 15) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:57, 27 December 2024 edit undoCarrite (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers98,629 edits →Writer Request: ReplyTag: Reply | ||
(73 intermediate revisions by 35 users not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
{{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
== |
== Vandalism Removal == | ||
I've just found out that an IP ] me and another user from the list last month. Could we do something to prevent that? Thanks ] (]) 14:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello I am interested in reviving the Wikiproject Report. I am very active within wikiprojects and most of my edits can be traced to either wikiproject television or wikiproject Doctor Who. I feel that WikiProjects are key to wikipedias growth and deserve more recognition. What steps would be required in order for me to join the Signpost Team. Some of the projects I wish to cover include ], ], ], and ]. <b>] ] ]</b> 00:04, 28 February 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | :{{Ping|JPxG}} should be easy for an admin to change page privileges?? ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">]</span> (]) 19:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah, this is cooked. I do not see a single IP subscription in this whole list, which suggests there is no reason to not have it semiprotected -- have also taken the liberty of TE-move protecting it because inb4onwheels. <b style="font-family:monospace;color:#E35BD8">]×]]</b> 22:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Writer Request == | |||
:{{ping|OlifanofmrTennant}} seems nobody has gotten back to you on this yet, apologies on behalf of the Signpost team! | |||
:To your question: Just go ahead! I assume you might already be familiar with the section's usual format, but it can't hurt to take a look at earlier issues (]); there is also some potentially useful material at ]. Once your have posted your draft report (e.g. via ]), others will take a look to review and copy-edit it before publication. In case you want to solicit feedback in advance on e.g. your choice of WikiProject to cover, draft interview questions etc., you could post at ]. Regards, ] (]) 01:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
I would like to help write stories for the Signpost as a official writer. Would that be possible. ] (]) 02:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Are there plans for using "piccy" in archives of The Signpost? == | |||
:Write something good and submit it. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Voilà! ] (]) 03:57, 27 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Page ] looks very different compared to how ]. Are there any plans to integrate the {{para|piccy-*}} template parameters into the archives of The Signpost? —] (]) 14:00, 3 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
:The landing page has been very broken since the introduction of the new format a few issues ago, and it has not been fixed or reverted. I am in awe of the improvements that have been made to the Signpost infrastructure over the last year or so, but this change is definitely still in early beta. I don't think I have the skills to fix it. – ] (]) 16:26, 3 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | : |
||
::Can we please revert to the previous layout for ]? We have black text on black backgrounds (accessibility problem), overlapping images, and images that exceed the cell-like spaces that they are being put in. The large images are not aligned vertically when the captions are different lengths, and the images overlap some of the text. It has looked bad for a few months now. I tried to insert a {{tl|clear}} template after the first row of images to vertically align the next row, but it looks like the images are not set using divs or a table. – ] (]) 14:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Last (12-12-24) issue was not announced == | |||
== Arbcom == | |||
Or at least, not through MassMessage. Was that intentional? — ] ] 15:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Any reason why a recent arbcom case that resulted in a de-cratting got zero coverage? ~~ ] (]) 15:27, 25 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
:@] it was announced, ]. <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 15:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|Jessintime}} Can you draft an article? Can you find anyone who can? Post notes to ] to get started. | |||
::Probably because I ask for it interwiki, at enws. Seems that all users of ] did not get it (). — ] ] 15:44, 15 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:One answer to your question is simply that there was not enough volunteer labor to write the article. Anyone can still cover the story. ]] 15:49, 27 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
::As someone who participated in the case, I don't believe I should be writing about it. ~~ ] (]) 03:22, 29 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Reply button is not working == | |||
== Front page == | |||
While readinga signpost i tried to reply to a comment showing below the page but the button gave me error said | |||
As long as everyone is complaining, I might as well voice my own gripe. In the good old days (yeah, former glory, wooden ships and iron men) the front page was a list of headlines, or rather sections and subsections. It was easy to read. This year, half the text is superimposed on a background photo. This degrades both the photo and the words, making them less easy and pleasant to read. It was a brave try, but it didn't work, at least for me and I'd like to click an option to show the old version, without pictures. Or words all below, above, or beside the picture; whatever. ] (]) 23:13, 1 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
" Could not find the comment you're replying to on the page" | |||
:Like this: ]? Or more like this: ]? ☆ <span style="white-space:nowrap;font-family: Papyrus">]</span> (]) 23:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
] (]) 09:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
::I made a similar note above. The two pages that Bri linked to are fine. It's ] that has been a problem for a few months. It can't possibly comply with our accessibility policies, for one thing. – ] (]) 00:53, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:{{ping|R1F4T}} - try it now. If you are on the article page, click on the talk tab and then the "edit" or "+" links on the top line. This should work automatically every time, but I think sometimes for the first comment a bit of code gets accidentally removed in the prepublication process (and then it should be just like creating any other talk page). Maybe if the comment was removed while you were typing, you'd get messed up. Maybe if you are commenting on an old article, something different might be happening. ]<sub>(])</sub> | |||
:::I'm trying to improve the layout/readability. I got something decent ish ] I think, but I can't for the life of my find how the hell to adjust padding/margins so that things don't overlap with each other. I'd get rid of text shadows on the ''In the media'' etc. sections, but that would mean playing with the live version since there's no CSS sandbox.  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 03:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::I think the only way to make the text accessible with arbitrary images is to separate it the text from the images. Black on translucent gray on an unknown image background is probably not accessible. – ] (]) 17:03, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::The latter version with more details as given by Bri is my preference. But either of these no-picture front page versions is better than what we've been getting the past couple months. ] (]) 09:32, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::I too prefer the pictureless version. But only because the picture-full version is badly aligned and legibility is compromised. I'm not, in principle, opposed to pictures. But the layout needs improvement.  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 20:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::agreed; i think pictures are good and well, but i also don't like that the text goes ''over'' them. <templatestyles src="Template:Color/styles.css" /><span class="tmp-color" style="color:#618A3D">... ] * <small>he/they</small> * ]</span> 22:14, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
::::The Big Pictures are a distracting, less than good (trying to say that gently) use of space requiring extra scrolling and making skimming very difficult, so the amt of time I care to spend on it is less- to un- informative, imo. ] (]) 22:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
:Another place to consider is ]. One of the advertised methods to receive notifications for new issues is to ]. However with the current format, the items are overlapping each other within each row. ] (]) 23:00, 2 May 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 03:57, 27 December 2024
← Current issueWT:POSTFeedbackPlease use this page for general or technical issues, praise, queries, or complaints related to The Signpost as a whole.
|
To help centralize discussions and keep related topics together, all talk pages of subpages of Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost except /Newsroom redirect here. |
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
The Signpost (talk · chat) |
---|
|
|
|
Recent changes: main · talk |
|
Vandalism Removal
I've just found out that an IP removed me and another user from the list last month. Could we do something to prevent that? Thanks Nobody (talk) 14:56, 15 November 2024 (UTC)
- @JPxG: should be easy for an admin to change page privileges?? ☆ Bri (talk) 19:15, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, this is cooked. I do not see a single IP subscription in this whole list, which suggests there is no reason to not have it semiprotected -- have also taken the liberty of TE-move protecting it because inb4onwheels. jp×g🗯️ 22:40, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Writer Request
I would like to help write stories for the Signpost as a official writer. Would that be possible. WikiEditor5678910 (talk) 02:44, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- Write something good and submit it. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Then do it again. Voilà! Carrite (talk) 03:57, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
Last (12-12-24) issue was not announced
Or at least, not through MassMessage. Was that intentional? — Alien 3
3 3 15:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Alien333 it was announced, for me at least. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 15:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Probably because I ask for it interwiki, at enws. Seems that all users of the interwiki list did not get it (random example). — Alien 3
3 3 15:44, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
- Probably because I ask for it interwiki, at enws. Seems that all users of the interwiki list did not get it (random example). — Alien 3
Reply button is not working
While readinga signpost i tried to reply to a comment showing below the page but the button gave me error said " Could not find the comment you're replying to on the page" R1F4T (talk) 09:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC)
- @R1F4T: - try it now. If you are on the article page, click on the talk tab and then the "edit" or "+" links on the top line. This should work automatically every time, but I think sometimes for the first comment a bit of code gets accidentally removed in the prepublication process (and then it should be just like creating any other talk page). Maybe if the comment was removed while you were typing, you'd get messed up. Maybe if you are commenting on an old article, something different might be happening. Smallbones(smalltalk)