Revision as of 15:56, 20 May 2023 editPoppysButterflies (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users31,869 edits →Seal of Approval← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 01:18, 28 December 2024 edit undoChimatronx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,279 editsNo edit summaryTag: Visual edit | ||
(36 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{About|the nonprofit group that rates TV shows|the TV guidelines and list of advisories|TV Parental Guidelines}} | {{About|the nonprofit group that rates TV shows|the TV guidelines and list of advisories|TV Parental Guidelines}} | ||
{{Use American English|date=January 2019}} | {{Use American English|date=January 2019}} | ||
{{Use mdy dates|date= |
{{Use mdy dates|date=July 2024}} | ||
{{Infobox organization | {{Infobox organization | ||
| name = Parents Television and Media Council | | name = Parents Television and Media Council | ||
| formation = {{Start date and age|1995}} | |||
| logo = |
| logo = Parents Television Council logo.svg | ||
| type = ] | |||
| |
| logo_size = 100px | ||
| |
| type = ] | ||
| abbreviation = PTMC | |||
⚫ | | |
||
| |
| formerly = Parents Television Council (1995-2021) | ||
| founder = ] | |||
| key_people = ] (founder), Tim Winter (current president), advisory board members include ], ], ] and ] | |||
| leader_title2 = ] | |||
⚫ | | |
||
| leader_name2 = Tim Winter | |||
⚫ | | focus = "Bringing back responsibility and ] to the ]" | ||
| |
| website = {{URL|parentstv.org}} | ||
| |
| footnotes = <ref name="NYT2010">{{cite news|title=TV Watchdog Group Is on the Defensive|work=The New York Times|author=Barnes, Brooks|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/25/business/media/25watchdog.html|date=October 25, 2010|page=B1|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062404/https://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/25/business/media/25watchdog.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
⚫ | | focus = "Bringing back responsibility and ] to the ]" | ||
| homepage = {{URL|parentstv.org}} | |||
⚫ | | headquarters = ], ] and ], California | ||
⚫ | | location_country = United States | ||
| method = Media attention, direct-appeal campaigns | |||
| membership = 12,000 (disputed) | |||
| leader_title = ] | |||
| leader_name = Jon Yasuda | |||
}} | }} | ||
The '''Parents Television and Media Council''' ('''PTMC'''), formerly the '''Parents Television Council''' ('''PTC'''), is an American media ] founded by ] |
The '''Parents Television and Media Council''' ('''PTMC'''), formerly the '''Parents Television Council''' ('''PTC'''), is an American media ] founded by ] political pundit ] in 1995, which advocates for what it considers to be responsible, ] content across all media platforms, and for advertisers to be held accountable for the content of television programs that they sponsor. The PTMC officially describes itself as a ] organization, although the group has also been described as ] and ]. | ||
The PTMC produces reviews, research reports, and online newsletters that highlight television programs and other entertainment products (such as ]s and ]) based on their suitability for family viewing. The PTMC has advocated for cable television networks to be subject to the same decency rules as broadcast television, and for television providers to allow subscribers to ]. The group has also been critical of the ] system, often deeming the ratings given by broadcasters to be inaccurate in comparison to their own assessments of a program's content. | The PTMC produces reviews, research reports, and online newsletters that highlight television programs and other entertainment products (such as ]s and ]) based on their suitability for family viewing. The PTMC has advocated for cable television networks to be subject to the same decency rules as broadcast television, and for television providers to allow subscribers to ]. The group has also been critical of the ] system, often deeming the ratings given by broadcasters to be inaccurate in comparison to their own assessments of a program's content. | ||
Line 29: | Line 35: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
], former host of ''The Tonight Show'', was PTC's honorary chairman and a member of its advisory board.]] | ], former host of ''The Tonight Show'', was PTC's honorary chairman and a member of its advisory board.]] | ||
In 1989, the ] (MRC) began monitoring the entertainment industry for alleged liberal bias through its Entertainment Division and newsletter ''TV, etc.''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.heritage.org/research/politicalphilosophy/hl380.cfm|title=Why Conservatives Should Be Optimistic About the Media|last=Bozell|first=L. Brent III|date= |
In 1989, the ] (MRC) began monitoring the entertainment industry for alleged liberal bias through its Entertainment Division and newsletter ''TV, etc.''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.heritage.org/research/politicalphilosophy/hl380.cfm|title=Why Conservatives Should Be Optimistic About the Media|last=Bozell|first=L. Brent III|date=January 21, 1992|work=Heritage Lecture #380|publisher=Heritage Foundation|access-date=August 30, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090315015903/http://www.heritage.org/Research/PoliticalPhilosophy/HL380.cfm|archive-date=March 15, 2009}}</ref> MRC founder and president L. Brent Bozell III later felt that "decency" was declining on most prime-time television programming.<ref name="annual report 14"/><ref name="decency police">{{cite magazine |last= Poniewozik |first= James |title= The Decency Police |magazine= Time |date= March 20, 2005 |volume= 165 |issue= 13 |url=https://content.time.com/time/subscriber/printout/0,8816,1039700,00.html|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20050324144407/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1039700,00.html |archive-date= March 24, 2005 |url-status= live }}</ref> The PTC began operations in 1995 following private planning meetings with ], ], and others in the entertainment industry, who would eventually make up the advisory board of the PTC. After the release of its first annual ''Family Guide to Prime-Time Television'' following the ], the PTC hoped to hold the entertainment industry accountable for the indecency that it perceived to be prominent on prime-time television.<ref>{{Citation |title= 2005 Annual Report |publisher= Parents Television Council |year= 2006 |url= http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/joinus/AR2005.pdf |archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20060428212424/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/joinus/AR2005.pdf |url-status= dead |archive-date= April 28, 2006 |page= 13 }}</ref> By 1996, the organization had the support of several members of the ], including ] and ], and an estimated annual budget of $142,000.<ref name="annual report 14"/> | ||
By 1998, with an estimated membership of 120,000,<ref name="annual report 15">{{ |
By 1998, with an estimated membership of 120,000,<ref name="annual report 15">{{Citation | title = 2005 Annual Report | publisher = Parents Television Council | year = 2006 | url = http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/joinus/AR2005.pdf | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060428212424/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/joinus/AR2005.pdf | url-status = dead | archive-date = April 28, 2006 | page = 15 }}</ref> comedian and former '']'' host ] joined PTC as its Honorary Chairman, and PTC released a report questioning the accuracy of the ] ratings system<ref>{{cite news|last=Broder|first=John M.|title=Broadcast Industry Defends Its TV Rating System|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1997/02/28/us/broadcast-industry-defends-its-tv-rating-system.html|work=The New York Times|date=February 28, 1997|page=A14|access-date=February 18, 2017|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062406/https://www.nytimes.com/1997/02/28/us/broadcast-industry-defends-its-tv-rating-system.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and campaigning for advertisers to stop sponsoring programs that the PTC claimed were offensive.<ref name="on the air 10 30 98">{{cite magazine|last=Flint|first=Joe|url= https://ew.com/article/1998/10/30/air-84/|title=On the Air|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|date=October 30, 1998|access-date=August 26, 2009|archive-date=January 9, 2016|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20160109182610/http://www.ew.com/article/1998/10/30/air|url-status=live}}</ref> Allen launched a newspaper advertisement campaign promoting the PTC, which was published in many outlets including '']''.<ref>{{cite news|last=Mifflin|first=Lawrie|title=A Call for Decency|url=https://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/14/arts/tv-notes-a-call-for-decency.html|work=The New York Times|date=October 14, 1998|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062408/https://www.nytimes.com/1998/10/14/arts/tv-notes-a-call-for-decency.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The PTC was noted for criticizing such shows as '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']''.<ref name="on the air 10 30 98"/><ref name="dawson filthy">"{{cite magazine|last=Flint|first=Joe|url=https://ew.com/article/1998/08/06/dawsons-creek-named-filthiest-tv-series/|title="Dawson's Creek" is named the filthiest TV series|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|date=August 6, 1998|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062429/https://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,83644,00.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Its website was also introduced that year, and its annual budget had already surpassed $1 million.<ref name="annual report 15"/> PTC rolled out another round of full-page newspaper advertisements in 1999; ''San Francisco Examiner'' television columnist Tim Goodman perceived Allen and the PTC of advocating complete censorship of television to allow only what PTC considered "Family-Safe TV".<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.sfgate.com/style/article/Sir-you-re-blocking-my-view-of-the-sewer-3059423.php|title=Sir, you're blocking my view of the sewer|last=Goodman|first=Tim|date=November 8, 1999|work=San Francisco Chronicle|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> | ||
The PTC lost nearly $1 million in 2008 and in 2009 received $2.9 million in revenue, a 29 percent drop from the previous year. In 2009 and 2010, the PTC cut its staff by 38 percent to save money.<ref name="NYT2010"/> | The PTC lost nearly $1 million in 2008 and in 2009 received $2.9 million in revenue, a 29 percent drop from the previous year. In 2009 and 2010, the PTC cut its staff by 38 percent to save money.<ref name="NYT2010"/> | ||
Line 39: | Line 45: | ||
==Leadership== | ==Leadership== | ||
], a conservative political activist, founded the Parents Television and Media Council in 1995.]] | ], a conservative political activist, founded the Parents Television and Media Council in 1995.]] | ||
PTC was founded in 1995 by longtime political activist ]. Bozell is a prominent conservative activist who has, among other things, served as executive director of the Conservative Victory Committee, a ] that has supported the election of dozens of conservative candidates |
PTC was founded in 1995 by longtime political activist ]. Bozell is a prominent conservative activist who has, among other things, served as executive director of the Conservative Victory Committee, a ] that has supported the election of dozens of conservative candidates. He was also National Finance Chairman for Pat Buchanan's 1992 presidential campaign, and later president of the National Conservative Political Action Committee. Bozell was succeeded as PTC President by Timothy F. Winter.<ref>{{cite news|last=Thompson |first=Bob |title=Fighting Indecency, One Bleep At a Time |newspaper=The Washington Post |page=C1 |date=December 9, 2004 |url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/2004/12/09/fighting-indecency-one-bleep-at-a-time/2be1a76e-bc1b-4e1d-898f-9f09d4f40ad8/ |archive-url= https://archive.today/20111023035854/http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A49907-2004Dec8?language=printer |archive-date=October 23, 2011 |access-date=April 18, 2022 }}</ref> Winter served as executive director of the PTC for three years prior to becoming president. Prior to joining the PTC, Mr. Winter's 20-year career as a media executive included positions with ] and ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/aboutus/winterbio.asp|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060105234511/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/aboutus/winterbio.asp|url-status=dead|archive-date=January 5, 2006|title=Tim Winter - President|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=August 20, 2009}}</ref> Until 2015 when his position was terminated, Dan Isett, Director of Corporate and Government Affairs of the PTC, represented the PTC on the Consumer Advisory Committee of the ].<ref>{{cite press release | title = Parents Television Council Appointed to FCC's Consumer Advisory Committee | publisher = Parents Television Council |date=July 26, 2007 | url =http://parentstv.org/PTC/news/release/2007/0726.asp | access-date = July 30, 2007 }}</ref> | ||
==Advisory board== | ==Advisory board== | ||
The PTC also has an advisory board consisting of ]s and ]s working to assist the council in their goal of protecting children against profanity and violence in the media. Notable members of the advisory board have included singer ], former football player ], writer-producer Coleman Luck, ] musician ], comedian and actor ] of CBS's '']'', former ] from ] and ] candidate ], film critic ], star of 1980s soap opera '']'' ], and ] producer Gary Johnson.<ref>{{cite web|title=Advisory Board|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/aboutus/advisoryboard/main.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date= |
The PTC also has an advisory board consisting of ]s and ]s working to assist the council in their goal of protecting children against profanity and violence in the media. Notable members of the advisory board have included singer ], former football player ], writer-producer Coleman Luck, ] musician ], comedian and actor ] of CBS's '']'', former ] from ] and ] candidate ], film critic ], star of 1980s soap opera '']'' ], and ] producer Gary Johnson.<ref>{{cite web|title=Advisory Board|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/aboutus/advisoryboard/main.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=November 27, 2008|archive-date=January 6, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060106001409/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/aboutus/advisoryboard/main.asp|url-status=live}}</ref> In addition, the PTC has established numerous local chapters for most ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/grassroots/main.asp|title=Parents Television Council Chapters|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=August 20, 2009|archive-date=January 6, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100106013415/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/grassroots/main.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref> Notable former advisory board members include - both of whom are now deceased - comedian ], original host of NBC's '']'', and ], participant in the ] and activist against ] music; Allen is now given the title of National Honorary Chairman-Emeritus.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/aboutus/advisoryboard/steveallen.htm|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070930201112/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/aboutus/advisoryboard/steveallen.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=September 30, 2007|title=Steve Allen - National Honorary Chairman-Emeritus|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=August 5, 2009}}</ref> ] associate professor Christian Christiansen questioned the backgrounds of certain PTC advisory board members as not consistent with their stance on morality.<ref name="Christensen">{{cite web | ||
| last = Christensen | | last = Christensen | ||
| first = Christian | | first = Christian | ||
| title = Pixelate the Morality Police | | title = Pixelate the Morality Police | ||
| work = CommonDreams.org | | work = CommonDreams.org | ||
|date=January 26, 2005 | |||
| publisher = CommonDreams.org | |||
|date=2005-01-26 | |||
| url = http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0126-23.htm | | url = http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0126-23.htm | ||
| access-date = |
| access-date = September 12, 2015 | ||
| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20050129033600/http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0126-23.htm | | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20050129033600/http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0126-23.htm | ||
| archive-date = |
| archive-date = January 29, 2005 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Line 58: | Line 63: | ||
===Columns and reports=== | ===Columns and reports=== | ||
The website of the PTC features reports on what the group says is harmful content on television and regular writings from its staff. Their research is done with the support of their |
The website of the PTC features reports on what the group says is harmful content on television and regular writings from its staff. Their research is done with the support of their Entertainment Tracking System, an archive of ] programming that they claim is the largest in the world.<ref>. Parents Television Council. Retrieved April 12, 2007.</ref> Such publications include: | ||
* '''"Culture Watch"''' |
* '''"Culture Watch"''' – Throughout 2005 and 2006, the PTC published columns under this series authored by Christopher Gildemeister, covering the influence on American culture by entertainment as well as exposing the increase in sex, violence, and profanity in cable television and the methods used by advertisers and broadcasting companies to attract young audiences.<ref>{{cite web|title=Culture Watch|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/culturewatch/archive.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|date=September 28, 2007|access-date=July 29, 2007|archive-date=August 7, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070807160655/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/culturewatch/archive.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref> In a December 2005 column of his, '']'' columnist Simon Dumenco criticized the PTC, arguing that the PTC is "very very afraid of gay TV characters".<ref>{{Cite news|last=Dumenco|first=Simon|title=Honey, I Shrank the Cable-TV Universe|periodical=Advertising Age|date=December 12, 2005|page=26}}</ref> Gildemeister defended the PTC as being "not homophobic" but simply opposed to "sexual references or innuendo (of any variety, hetero, homo or other) aired where children might be exposed to them."<ref name="culture watch 12 26">{{cite web | last = Gildemeister | first = Christopher| title = Culture Watch - Exposing Sex, Violence, and Language in the Media - for the week of 12.26.05 (part 2 of 2) | publisher = Parents Television Council | date = December 26, 2006 | url = http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/culturewatch/2005/1226.asp | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070930220801/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/culturewatch/2005/1226.asp | archive-date = September 30, 2007 | access-date = June 28, 2007 }}</ref> | ||
* '''"Parenting and the Media"''' authored by Rod Gustafson, where he offers advice on parenting children who frequent the media.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/rgcolumns/main.asp|title=Parenting and the Media: A Column by Rod Gustafson|publisher=Parents Television Council}}</ref> | * '''"Parenting and the Media"''' authored by Rod Gustafson, where he offers advice on parenting children who frequent the media.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/rgcolumns/main.asp|title=Parenting and the Media: A Column by Rod Gustafson|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=July 29, 2007|archive-date=August 7, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070807163927/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/rgcolumns/main.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
*'''"TV Trends"''' |
*'''"TV Trends"''' – Another column by Christopher Gildemeister, published since October 2007 intending to inform parents and TV viewers in general about what he determines to be "harmful or questionable prime-time programming."<ref>{{cite web|title=TV Trends|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/TVTrends/main.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|date=March 14, 2008|access-date=March 14, 2008|archive-date=March 3, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080303234608/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/TVTrends/main.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref> ''Hartford Courant'' television critic Roger Catlin quoted Gildemeister as criticizing ABC for having an "apparent fetish for transsexuals" in certain programs.<ref>{{cite news|url= https://www.seattletimes.com/entertainment/tv/on-tv-being-gay-is-so-pass-now-transexuals-are-in/|title=On TV, being gay is so passé; now transexuals are in|last=Catlin|first=Roger|date=November 11, 2007|work=The Seattle Times|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> | ||
*Former president Bozell's weekly entertainment column, which it links to within the home page | *Former president Bozell's weekly entertainment column, which it links to within the home page | ||
In 2000, PTC's report ''What a Difference a Decade Makes'' allegedly stated that there was an increase in profanity, sex, and violence on ]. The report also claimed that references to homosexuality increased the most during that decade |
In 2000, PTC's report ''What a Difference a Decade Makes'' allegedly stated that there was an increase in profanity, sex, and violence on ]. The report also claimed that references to homosexuality increased the most during that decade – by a factor of 24.<ref>{{harvnb|Green|2005|p=136}}</ref> In 2002, the PTC released a report claiming that there was an increase in profanity on network programming shown during the first hour of ].<ref name="oh the profanity">{{cite news|last=Farhi |first=Paul |title=Oh, the Profanity! |url= https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/lifestyle/style/2002/04/21/oh-the-profanity/d84bcab9-57a1-478c-b10f-8ab09fa5bc8c/ |newspaper=The Washington Post |date=April 19, 2002 |archive-url=https://archive.today/20110630224330/http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A16027-2002Apr19 |archive-date=June 30, 2011|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> In a 2006 report titled ''Wolves in Sheep's Clothing'', analyst Kristen Fyfe reported an increase in violent, profane, and sexual content in children's programming.<ref name="wolves">{{citation | author = Kristen Fyfe| title = Wolves in Sheep's Clothing: A Content Analysis of Children's Television| publisher = Parents Television Council| date = March 2, 2006| url = http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/reports/childrensstudy/childrensstudy.pdf| access-date = August 5, 2007| archive-date = August 8, 2007| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070808140158/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reports/childrensstudy/childrensstudy.pdf| url-status = live}}</ref> Among its results, based on research during summer 2005, the PTC stated that '']'' was the most violent program, and claimed ] had the most violent incidents.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/03/02/children.television/index.html|title=Group: Children's TV isn't kid stuff|last=McManus|first=Michael|date=March 2, 2006|publisher=CNN|access-date=March 15, 2009|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062431/http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/03/02/children.television/index.html|url-status=live}}</ref> Richard Huff of the '']'' criticized the report for misinterpreting an episode of '']'', "]", over its intent to satirize profanity implicitly.<ref>{{cite web|last=Huff |first=Richard |title=A four-letter word for decency police: Lame |work=New York Daily News |date=March 4, 2006 |url=https://www.nydailynews.com/archives/entertainment/four-letter-word-decency-police-lame-article-1.630523|access-date=May 21, 2020 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101106185047/http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/entertainment/2006/03/07/2006-03-07_a_four-letter_word_for_decen.html |archive-date=November 6, 2010 }}</ref> | ||
Following the ], PTC issued a report ''Faith in a Box'' that analyzed depictions of |
Following the ], PTC issued a report ''Faith in a Box'' that analyzed depictions of religion in primetime television. The study stated that most positive references to religion were on ]s such as '']'', while claiming that scripted shows tended to be more negative towards it.<ref>{{harvnb|Lipschultz|2008|pp=154–157}}</ref> The report also ranked ] as the "most anti-religious network", followed by NBC, UPN, ABC, CBS, and the WB.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://variety.com/2006/scene/markets-festivals/ptc-unhappy-with-tv-s-religious-stereotypes-1117955772/|title=PTC unhappy with TV's religious stereotypes|last=Learmonth|first=Michael|date=December 14, 2006|work=Variety|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> In 2008, PTC published a report titled ''Happily Never After'', using analysis of several primetime shows early in the 2007-2008 television season that asserted that ] was more favored on television shows during that time period.<ref>{{cite news|title=Study: TV shows sex, but not in marriage|url= https://www.today.com/popculture/study-tv-shows-sex-not-marriage-1c9483863|agency=Associated Press|date=August 6, 2008|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> Ian O'Doherty of '']'' asked regarding the PTC's marriage depiction study: "After all, would you rather watch people having fun or would you rather watch a realistic depiction of marriage, which ... would simply be an hour of two people sullenly chewing their food, pausing occasionally only to throw each other filthies and occasionally grumbling under their breath how the biggest regret of their life was ever setting eyes on you and that their mother was right all along?"<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.independent.ie/opinion/columnists/ian-odoherty/truly-an-inspiration-to-us-all-1456239.html|title=Truly, an inspiration to us all|last=O'Doherty|first=Ian|date=August 15, 2008|work=The Irish Independent|access-date=September 30, 2009|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062413/https://www.independent.ie/opinion/independent-journalists/ian-odoherty/|url-status=live}}</ref> PTC released a report in October 2009 stating that prime-time television shows on broadcast networks had twice as many depictions of ] in 2009 than in 2004.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/arts/television/29arts-MORETVVIOLEN_BRF.html|title=Study: More TV Violence Against Women|last=Wyatt|first=Edward|date=October 29, 2009|work=The New York Times|access-date=November 13, 2009|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062436/https://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/29/arts/television/29arts-MORETVVIOLEN_BRF.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
In November 2010, the PTC released a study, ''Habitat for Profanity: Broadcast TV's Sharp Increase in Foul Language'', which claims that there was a sharp rise in the usage of ] between 2005 and 2010—during the 8 pm to 9 pm ET/PT time period commonly referred to them as the ], the PTC claimed that there were 111 instances of profanity during this hour in 2010 versus 10 in 2005; during all of prime time, 276 instances in 2010 against 11 in 2005. The study claimed that there was a 69.3% increase in prime time in general between 2005 and 2010, with the Fox network being heavily accused of bringing a 269% increase for the network during that period. The study also claimed instances in which there was profanity, but the offending word was ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-report-notes-sharp-rise-primetime-broadcast-profanity-58124|title=PTC Report Notes "Sharp Rise" in Primetime Broadcast Profanity|work=Broadcasting & Cable|date=November 9, 2010|access-date=April 18, 2022 |
In November 2010, the PTC released a study, ''Habitat for Profanity: Broadcast TV's Sharp Increase in Foul Language'', which claims that there was a sharp rise in the usage of ] between 2005 and 2010—during the 8 pm to 9 pm ET/PT time period commonly referred to them as the ], the PTC claimed that there were 111 instances of profanity during this hour in 2010 versus 10 in 2005; during all of prime time, 276 instances in 2010 against 11 in 2005. The study claimed that there was a 69.3% increase in prime time in general between 2005 and 2010, with the Fox network being heavily accused of bringing a 269% increase for the network during that period. The study also claimed instances in which there was profanity, but the offending word was ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-report-notes-sharp-rise-primetime-broadcast-profanity-58124|title=PTC Report Notes "Sharp Rise" in Primetime Broadcast Profanity|work=Broadcasting & Cable|date=November 9, 2010|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> | ||
===Entertainment reviews and analysis=== | ===Entertainment reviews and analysis=== | ||
The PTC's activities extend to evaluation, rating, and educating around broadcast TV programs according to a traffic light system across three categories of sex, violence and profanity, accumulating to an overall rating based on the ratings of these three categories. The guide has been in use since the ]<ref>{{cite news|last=Carroll|first=Jerry|title=A Finger Wagger's Guide to Television|url=https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/A-Finger-Wagger-s-Guide-to-Television-3017614.php|work=San Francisco Examiner|page=B3|date= |
The PTC's activities extend to evaluation, rating, and educating around broadcast TV programs according to a traffic light system across three categories of sex, violence and profanity, accumulating to an overall rating based on the ratings of these three categories. The guide has been in use since the ]<ref>{{cite news|last=Carroll|first=Jerry|title=A Finger Wagger's Guide to Television|url=https://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/A-Finger-Wagger-s-Guide-to-Television-3017614.php|work=San Francisco Examiner|page=B3|date=December 26, 1995|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> using the traffic light system.<ref name="annual report 14">{{Citation | title = 2005 Annual Report | publisher = Parents Television Council | year = 2006 | url = http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/joinus/AR2005.pdf | page = 14 | access-date = September 4, 2008 | archive-date = February 26, 2009 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20090226031742/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/joinus/AR2005.pdf | url-status = dead }}</ref> In the PTC's definition of its traffic light system, green light indicates that the program is "appropriate for all ages", a yellow light indicates that the program "would be unsuitable for children under the age of 14", and a red light indicates that the program is "appropriate for adult audiences only".<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/familyguide/Ratings.asp|title=Family Guide to Prime Time Television|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=August 16, 2011|archive-date=June 6, 2011|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110606053846/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/familyguide/Ratings.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
Every television season since 1995–96, the council has released a list of the best and worst prime-time television programs for family viewing. The PTC's website includes the guide from the ] at the earliest.<ref name="bw9697">{{cite web | title = Top 10 Best and Worst Shows on Primetime TV 1996-1997 | work = ParentsTV.org | publisher = Parents Television Council | year = 1997 | url = http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/97top/main.asp | access-date = 2007 |
Every television season since 1995–96, the council has released a list of the best and worst prime-time television programs for family viewing. The PTC's website includes the guide from the ] at the earliest.<ref name="bw9697">{{cite web | title = Top 10 Best and Worst Shows on Primetime TV 1996-1997 | work = ParentsTV.org | publisher = Parents Television Council | year = 1997 | url = http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/97top/main.asp | access-date = June 3, 2007 | archive-date = April 22, 2012 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20120422160527/http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/97top/main.asp | url-status = live }}</ref> Starting with the 2005–2006 season, their list was based on their traffic light system as well as ] ratings of viewership among children ages 2–17 of certain shows.<ref name="bw0506"/> Popular shows that have frequently been praised as the most family-friendly programs on television include '']'',<ref name="bw0102">{{cite web|title=Top 10 Best and Worst Shows on Primetime Network TV 2001-2002 |work=ParentsTV.org |publisher=Parents Television Council |year=2002 |url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/2002/main.asp |access-date=June 28, 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070609011639/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/2002/main.asp |archive-date=June 9, 2007 }}</ref><ref name="best0203">{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/2003/top10best.asp|title=Top 10 Best Shows on Primetime Network TV 2002-2003|publisher=Parents Television Council|year=2003|access-date=December 16, 2007|archive-date=June 4, 2012|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120604212241/http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/2003/top10best.asp|url-status=live}}</ref> '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'',<ref name="bw9899">{{cite web | title = PTC's Annual Top 10 Best & Worst Family Shows on Network Television, 1998-99 TV Season | work = ParentsTV.org | publisher = Parents Television Council | year = 1999 | url = http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/99top/main.asp | access-date = June 28, 2007 | archive-date = January 18, 2020 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200118192002/http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/99top/main.asp | url-status = dead }}</ref> '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'',<ref name="bw0506">{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/main.asp|title=What Are Your Children Watching?: Research on sex, violence, and profanity on Television|publisher=Parents Television Council|year=2005|access-date=October 30, 2007|archive-date=December 11, 2006|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061211215308/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/main.asp|url-status=live}}</ref> and '']''. Popular shows frequently named "Worst of the Season" include '']'',<ref name="bw0506"/> '']'',<ref name="bw0506"/><ref name="bw0102"/> '']'', ''],'' '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'',<ref name="bw0506" /> '']'', '']'',<ref name="bw0506"/><ref name="bw9900">{{cite web|title=Top 10 Best and Worst Shows on Primetime Network TV 1999-2000 |publisher=Parents Television Council |year=2000 |url=http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/2000top/main.asp |access-date=June 28, 2007 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061212220452/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reports/top10bestandworst/2000top/main.asp |archive-date=December 12, 2006 }}</ref> ''Friends'',<ref name="bw9697"/> '']'', '']'',<ref name="bw9697"/><ref name="bw9899"/> '']''<ref name="bw0102"/><ref name="bw9899"/> and '']''.<ref name="bw9697"/><ref name="bw9899"/> | ||
On a weekly basis, the PTC publishes reviews of what they consider to be the best and worst television programming for family viewing, authored by the various entertainment analysts at the council.<ref>{{cite web|title=Best and Worst Family TV Shows of the Week|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/bw/archive.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|date=2008 |
On a weekly basis, the PTC publishes reviews of what they consider to be the best and worst television programming for family viewing, authored by the various entertainment analysts at the council.<ref>{{cite web|title=Best and Worst Family TV Shows of the Week|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/bw/archive.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|date=May 2, 2008|access-date=May 10, 2008|archive-date=April 12, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080412001403/http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/bw/archive.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref> ], creator of ''Family Guy'', compared the PTC's frequent negative reviews of the series to "hate mail from Hitler" and "They're literally terrible human beings. I've read their newsletter, I've visited their website, and they're just rotten to the core. For an organization that prides itself on 'Christian' values ... they spend their entire day hating people."<ref>{{cite web|url= https://www.advocate.com/arts-entertainment/television/2008/01/25/read-oscar-host-seth-macfarlanes-one-and-only-gay-interview?pg=full |title=Read Oscar Host Seth MacFarlane's One and Only Gay Interview |last=Voss |first=Brandon |date=January 25, 2008 |work=The Advocate |access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20101110104416/http://www.advocate.com/printArticle.aspx?id=22202 |archive-date=November 10, 2010 }}</ref> MacFarlane became a target again when the PTC protested the ]' decision to have him host the 85th ceremony.<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://ew.com/article/2012/10/04/ptc-oscar-seth-macfarlane/|title=Parents group protests Oscars host Seth MacFarlane|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062441/https://ew.com/article/2012/10/04/ptc-oscar-seth-macfarlane/|url-status=live}}</ref> "So You Think You Can Rate a TV Show?", the title being a play on the title of ] television series '']'', is a weekly column the PTC began in July 2007 to claim that networks inaccurately rate their shows based on the ], whether the network applied the improper age-based rating (such as TV-PG or TV-14) or failed to include the proper content descriptors (such as "L" for ] or "V" for ]).<ref>{{cite web|title=So You Think You Can Rate a TV Show?|url=http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/ratings/main.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|date=May 2, 2008|access-date=May 10, 2008|archive-date=May 9, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080509200129/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/ratings/main.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
===Seal of Approval=== | ===Seal of Approval=== | ||
To recognize excellence in the media, the Parents Television Council awards its Seal of Approval to television shows, movies, home products, and advertisers that provide or sponsor content it deems to be "family-friendly". It is divided into two categories: Entertainment and Advertiser.<ref>{{cite web|title=The PTC Seal of Approval|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/awards/main.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=2009- |
To recognize excellence in the media, the Parents Television Council awards its Seal of Approval to television shows, movies, home products, and advertisers that provide or sponsor content it deems to be "family-friendly". It is divided into two categories: Entertainment and Advertiser.<ref>{{cite web|title=The PTC Seal of Approval|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/awards/main.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=August 5, 2009|archive-date=August 16, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090816161417/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/awards/main.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref> Popular television shows that have been awarded include '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and most recently, '']''. Also receiving the Entertainment Seal of Approval are ]'s KidZone television filtering service, The Jimmy Wilson Films Children's Adventure Series, the ] ] television service, and the ] DVD filtering product.<ref>{{cite web|title=The PTC Seal of Approval - Recipients|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/awards/soa/ESOA.asp|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120907022249/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/awards/soa/ESOA.asp|url-status=dead|archive-date=September 7, 2012|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=August 5, 2009}}</ref> | ||
==Activism== | ==Activism== | ||
===Broadcast indecency=== | ===Broadcast indecency=== | ||
In 2003, the PTC unsuccessfully campaigned for the FCC to take action against the NBC television network in response to the use of the word "]" by ], lead singer for the rock band ], during the network's January 2003 telecast of the ]. Among an audience of nearly 20 million, the FCC received only 234 complaints, 217 of which came from the PTC.<ref>{{harvnb|Lane|2006|p=43}}</ref> In October 2003, the FCC decided not to fine NBC because Bono's obscenity was ruled as fleeting and not describing sexual or excretory functions, the FCC's standard for fining a network for indecency.<ref>{{cite news | title = FCC OKs Bono's F-Word Slip | publisher = CBS News |date=2003 |
In 2003, the PTC unsuccessfully campaigned for the FCC to take action against the NBC television network in response to the use of the word "]" by ], lead singer for the rock band ], during the network's January 2003 telecast of the ]. Among an audience of nearly 20 million, the FCC received only 234 complaints, 217 of which came from the PTC.<ref>{{harvnb|Lane|2006|p=43}}</ref> In October 2003, the FCC decided not to fine NBC because Bono's obscenity was ruled as fleeting and not describing sexual or excretory functions, the FCC's standard for fining a network for indecency.<ref>{{cite news | title = FCC OKs Bono's F-Word Slip | publisher = CBS News |date=October 7, 2003 | url =https://www.cbsnews.com/news/fcc-oks-bonos-f-word-slip/| access-date = April 18, 2022 }}</ref> After the PTC filed an Application for Review to the FCC, in March 2004 the FCC decided that the word was indecent by law but still decided not to fine NBC; however, the ruling was to serve as a warning to networks that there would be a "zero tolerance" policy towards obscene language willfully used during the daytime.<ref>{{harvnb|Lane|2006|pp=44–45}}</ref> However, the PTC's complaints about profanity used by presenter ] in the December 10, 2003, broadcast of the ''Billboard Music Awards'' led the FCC to conclude that the language violated decency law.<ref>{{harvnb|Lipschultz|2008|pp=133–134}}</ref> | ||
The PTC began attracting more attention after it filed around 65,000<ref>{{cite web|title=Broadcast Indecency Campaign|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/fcc/Complaints.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070503021051/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/fcc/Complaints.asp|archive-date=May 3, 2007}}</ref> complaints to the ] (FCC) about the ], in which one of performer ]'s nipple shielded breasts, was exposed for 9/16ths of a second. FCC chairman ] stated that the number of indecency complaints to the FCC had risen from 350 in the years 2000 and 2001, to 14,000 in 2002 and 240,000 in 2003.<ref name="mediaweek 2004">{{cite news | last = Shields | first = Todd | title = Activists Dominate Content Complaints | work = Mediaweek | publisher = Parents Television Council |date=2004 |
The PTC began attracting more attention after it filed around 65,000<ref>{{cite web|title=Broadcast Indecency Campaign|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/fcc/Complaints.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070503021051/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/fcc/Complaints.asp|archive-date=May 3, 2007}}</ref> complaints to the ] (FCC) about the ], in which one of performer ]'s nipple shielded breasts, was exposed for 9/16ths of a second. FCC chairman ] stated that the number of indecency complaints to the FCC had risen from 350 in the years 2000 and 2001, to 14,000 in 2002 and 240,000 in 2003.<ref name="mediaweek 2004">{{cite news | last = Shields | first = Todd | title = Activists Dominate Content Complaints | work = Mediaweek | publisher = Parents Television Council |date=December 6, 2004 | url = http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000731656 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20050213091055/http://www.mediaweek.com/mediaweek/headlines/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000731656 | archive-date = February 13, 2005 | access-date = June 28, 2007 }}</ref> It was also found that the PTC had generated most of the indecency complaints received by the ].<ref name="mediaweek 2004" /><ref name="lynetterice">{{Cite news| last = Rice| first = Lynette| title = Four TV execs come clean about on-air decency rules| newspaper = ]| issue = #933| pages = 43| date = May 11, 2007| url = https://ew.com/article/2007/05/03/four-tv-execs-come-clean-about-air-decency-rules/| access-date = April 18, 2022| archive-date = December 30, 2020| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062421/https://www.ew.com/ew/article/0,,20037552_2,00.html| url-status = live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news | last = Fisher | first = Ken | title = Activist organization responsible for 99% of FCC complaints | work = arstechnica.com | publisher = Ars Technica | date = December 7, 2004 | url = https://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2004/12/4442-2/ | access-date = April 18, 2022 | archive-date = December 30, 2020 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062423/https://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2004/12/4442-2/ | url-status = live }}</ref> In July 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit voided the fine.<ref>{{cite news|last=Loviglio |first=Joann |title=Appeals court throws out fine against CBS in 'wardrobe malfunction' incident |url= https://www.seattletimes.com/sports/other-sports/appeals-court-throws-out-fine-against-cbs-in-wardrobe-malfunction-incident/ |work=The Seattle Times |agency=Associated Press |date=July 21, 2008|access-date=April 18, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110901095604/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/othersports/2008065154_cbs22.html |archive-date=September 1, 2011 }}</ref> | ||
] | ] | ||
After the halftime show, the PTC launched five more FCC complaint drives, starting March 2004 with an episode of ]'s '']'' titled "Happy Jack", which revolved around character ] being caught ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/action/70s/content.htm|title=Content from the March 24, 2004 episode of Fox's That '70s Show|publisher=Parents Television Council|date= |
After the halftime show, the PTC launched five more FCC complaint drives, starting March 2004 with an episode of ]'s '']'' titled "Happy Jack", which revolved around character ] being caught ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/action/70s/content.htm|archive-url=https://archive.today/20120905221449/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/action/70s/content.htm|url-status=dead|archive-date=September 5, 2012|title=Content from the March 24, 2004 episode of Fox's That '70s Show|publisher=Parents Television Council|date=March 25, 2004}}</ref> The beginning of the ] sparked four new campaigns, the first being against NBC's animated series '']'', stating that it contained a "barrage of sexual innuendo and profanity"<ref>{{cite web|last=Winter|first=Tim|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/action/fotp/emailH.htm|title=PTC E-Alert (Father of the Pride)|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=August 5, 2009|archive-date=June 15, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090615025324/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/action/fotp/emailH.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> while being promoted "from the creators of '']''", which they felt would potentially attract children to watching the series. That campaign led to over 11,000 email complaints to the FCC.<ref>{{cite web | last = Halonen | first = Doug| title = PTC E-Mails Generate Results| work = Television Week| publisher = Parents Television Council |date=October 18, 2004 | url = http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/news/2004/indecency_tvweek3.htm | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20071206041839/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/news/2004/indecency_tvweek3.htm | archive-date = December 6, 2007 | access-date = July 18, 2007 }}</ref> Later, shortly after ] broadcast the word "]" during an airing of '']'', the PTC took action again, this time claiming that CBS ignored a warning from the ] (FCC) that there would be zero tolerance toward unbleeped profanity.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/cbs-hit-f-word-complaint-104511|title=CBS Hit with F-Word Complaint|last=Eggerton|first=John|date=September 24, 2004|work=Broadcasting & Cable|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> However, those complaints became moot when ], then-owners of CBS, settled with the FCC for $3.5 million regarding all allegedly indecent programming broadcast in the years around 2003 and 2004, including the ''Big Brother 5'' episode in question.<ref>{{cite web |title=Viacom, FCC reach $3.5 million agreement |url=https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna6573618 |website=NBC News |access-date=April 18, 2022 |date=November 24, 2004}}</ref> In March 2006, the FCC ruled that ''Father of the Pride'' was not indecent.<ref>{{citation | author = Martin, Kevin | author-link = Kevin Martin (FCC) | title = Notices of Apparent Liability and Memorandum Opinion and Order | version = FCC 06-17 | publisher = ] | url = http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-17A1.pdf | display-authors = etal | access-date = January 14, 2008 | archive-date = April 17, 2006 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20060417182351/http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-06-17A1.pdf | url-status = live }}</ref> Following were complaints about an October 2004 episode of ]'s short-lived teen drama '']'', which the PTC felt was sexually charged.<ref>{{cite web|last=Winter|first=Tim|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/action/lawki/email.htm|title=PTC E-Alert (Life As We Know It)|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=August 5, 2009|archive-date=February 18, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090218074613/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/action/lawki/email.htm|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
The PTC started off 2005 with their campaign against the '']'' episode "Our Sons and Daughters", leading to CBS being fined for indecency in March 2006; the PTC objected to the depiction of teenagers participating in an ] in that episode. CBS argued that the episode "featured an important and socially relevant storyline warning parents to exercise greater supervision of their teenagers."<ref name="eonline">{{cite news | last = Finn | first = Natalie | title = CBS Fined for "Trace" of Indecency | work = ] |date= |
The PTC started off 2005 with their campaign against the '']'' episode "Our Sons and Daughters", leading to CBS being fined for indecency in March 2006; the PTC objected to the depiction of teenagers participating in an ] in that episode. CBS argued that the episode "featured an important and socially relevant storyline warning parents to exercise greater supervision of their teenagers."<ref name="eonline">{{cite news | last = Finn | first = Natalie | title = CBS Fined for "Trace" of Indecency | work = ] |date=March 15, 2006 |url=https://www.eonline.com/news/51883/cbs-fined-for-trace-of-indecency| access-date = April 18, 2022 }}</ref> The FCC fined CBS $3.63 million in March 2006 for this episode,<ref name="eonline" /> but after a court settlement, the network agreed to pay $300,000 in fines. At the end of January 2005, the FCC rejected a set of complaints that PTC filed between October 2001 and February 2004 for allegedly indecent programs such as NBC's '']'', the WB's '']'', and Fox's '']''.<ref>{{cite news|author=Armas, Genaro C.|title=FCC denies 36 indecency complaints over "Friends", "The Simpsons" and other shows|url=http://lubbockonline.com/stories/012405/upd_075-4790.shtml|agency=Associated Press|date=January 24, 2005|access-date=November 27, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20131006003225/http://lubbockonline.com/stories/012405/upd_075-4790.shtml|archive-date=October 6, 2013}}</ref> The FCC received complaints from the PTC in the summer over an unedited broadcast of the lyric "who the fuck are you?" in ]'s song "]" from the '']'' concert broadcast July 2, 2005, on ABC stations on the East Coast.<ref>{{harvnb|Lipschultz|2008|p=154}}</ref> | ||
In 2006, PTC requested that the FCC deny broadcast license renewal for ] CBS station ] because they felt that the broadcast of the ''Without a Trace'' episode that was ruled indecent violated community standards and that CBS failed to take action to reduce indecent content following the FCC fines.<ref>{{cite news|last=Pierce|first=Scott D.|title=Parents Television Council subverts process|url=https://www.deseret.com/2006/9/2/19971829/scott-d-pierce-parents-television-council-subverts-process|access-date=April 18, 2022|newspaper=Deseret News|date=September 2, 2006|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062426/https://www.deseret.com/2006/9/2/19971829/scott-d-pierce-parents-television-council-subverts-process|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Eggerton|first=John|url=http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6493178.html|title=CBS Defends Inaction on Without a Trace|work=Broadcasting & Cable|date= |
In 2006, PTC requested that the FCC deny broadcast license renewal for ] CBS station ] because they felt that the broadcast of the ''Without a Trace'' episode that was ruled indecent violated community standards and that CBS failed to take action to reduce indecent content following the FCC fines.<ref>{{cite news|last=Pierce|first=Scott D.|title=Parents Television Council subverts process|url=https://www.deseret.com/2006/9/2/19971829/scott-d-pierce-parents-television-council-subverts-process|access-date=April 18, 2022|newspaper=Deseret News|date=September 2, 2006|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062426/https://www.deseret.com/2006/9/2/19971829/scott-d-pierce-parents-television-council-subverts-process|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Eggerton|first=John|url=http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/CA6493178.html|title=CBS Defends Inaction on Without a Trace|work=Broadcasting & Cable|date=October 22, 2007|access-date=October 22, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062427/https://www.nexttv.com/}}</ref> Subsequently, CBS agreed to pay the FCC $300,000 to settle the KUTV license challenge.<ref>{{cite news|last=Eggerton|first=John|url=https://www.benton.org/headlines/cbs-pays-300000-settle-kutv-license-challenge|title=CBS Pays $300,000 To Settle KUTV License Challenge|work=Broadcasting & Cable|date=November 23, 2007|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> Starting from December 2007,<ref>{{cite web|last=Hibberd |first=James |title=Parents Television Council Denounces CBS' 'Dexter' Plan |url= https://adage.com/article/james-hibberd-rated/parents-television-council-denounces-cbs-s-dexter-plan/122424 |work=TV Week |date=December 5, 2007 |access-date=April 18, 2022 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090216103322/http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/james-hibberd/2007/12/parents_television_council_den.php |archive-date=February 16, 2009 }}</ref> the organization demanded that CBS cancel its plan to rebroadcast an edited version of the ] drama '']'', whose title character was a serial killer and police forensics analyst,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sho.com/site/dexter/cast.do|archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20091002070444/http://www.sho.com/site/dexter/cast.do|url-status=dead|archive-date=October 2, 2009|title=Cast & Characters - Dexter Morgan/Michael C. Hall|publisher=Showtime|access-date=August 30, 2009}}</ref> because it felt that the program would glorify ] even with the edits. By early February 2008, the Council claimed to have collected 17,000 complaints to CBS.<ref>{{cite news|last=Stelter|first=Brian|title=Showtime's Serial Killer Moves to CBS, to a Not Entirely Warm Welcome|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/arts/television/16dext.html|work=]|date=February 16, 2008|access-date=March 6, 2008|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062427/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/arts/television/16dext.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
Starting from December 2007,<ref>{{cite web|last=Hibberd |first=James |title=Parents Television Council Denounces CBS' 'Dexter' Plan |url= https://adage.com/article/james-hibberd-rated/parents-television-council-denounces-cbs-s-dexter-plan/122424 |work=TV Week |date=2007-12-05 |access-date=2022-04-18 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090216103322/http://www.tvweek.com/blogs/james-hibberd/2007/12/parents_television_council_den.php |archive-date=2009-02-16 }}</ref> the organization demanded that CBS cancel its plan to rebroadcast an edited version of the ] drama '']'', whose title character was a serial killer and police forensics analyst,<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.sho.com/site/dexter/cast.do|archive-url=http://arquivo.pt/wayback/20091002070444/http://www.sho.com/site/dexter/cast.do|url-status=dead|archive-date=2009-10-02|title=Cast & Characters - Dexter Morgan/Michael C. Hall|publisher=Showtime|access-date=2009-08-30}}</ref> because it felt that the program would glorify ] even with the edits. By early February 2008, the Council claimed to have collected 17,000 complaints to CBS.<ref>{{cite news|last=Stelter|first=Brian|title=Showtime's Serial Killer Moves to CBS, to a Not Entirely Warm Welcome|url=https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/arts/television/16dext.html|work=]|date=2008-02-16|access-date=2008-03-06|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062427/https://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/16/arts/television/16dext.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
On January 25, 2008, the FCC proposed an estimated $1.4 million fine against ABC for a scene of female nudity in the '']'' episode "]" aired on February 25, 2003. Because the episode aired outside the indecency "safe harbor" in the Central and Mountain Time Zones, the fine applied only to ABC stations in those zones.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/97613-FCC_Proposes_1_4M_Fine_Against_ABC_Stations_for_NYPD_Blue.php|title=FCC Proposes $1.4M Fine Against ABC Stations for NYPD Blue|last=Eggerton|first=John|date= |
On January 25, 2008, the FCC proposed an estimated $1.4 million fine against ABC for a scene of female nudity in the '']'' episode "]" aired on February 25, 2003. Because the episode aired outside the indecency "safe harbor" in the Central and Mountain Time Zones, the fine applied only to ABC stations in those zones.<ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/97613-FCC_Proposes_1_4M_Fine_Against_ABC_Stations_for_NYPD_Blue.php|title=FCC Proposes $1.4M Fine Against ABC Stations for NYPD Blue|last=Eggerton|first=John|date=January 25, 2008|work=Broadcasting & Cable|access-date=August 30, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062437/https://www.nexttv.com/}} During the ] when the episode aired, ''NYPD Blue'' was shown on ABC on Tuesdays, 10:00 p.m. (Eastern and Pacific Time Zones) and 9:00 P.M. in the Central and Mountain zones.</ref> The PTC praised the FCC's action.<ref>{{cite news|last=Eggerton|first=John|title=PTC Praises FCC's Proposed NYPD Blue Fine|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-praises-fccs-proposed-nypd-blue-fine-27808|work=]|date=January 28, 2008|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> However, PTC president Winter condemned ABC's decision to appeal the fine in federal court.<ref>{{cite news|last=Teinowitz|first=Ira|title=ABC Challenges FCC's 'NYPD Blue' Fine in Court|url=http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/02/abc_challenges_fccs_nypd_blue.php|work=TV Week|date=February 21, 2008|access-date=March 6, 2008|archive-date=February 27, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080227014626/http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/02/abc_challenges_fccs_nypd_blue.php|url-status=dead}}</ref> PTC has also criticized the ]' decision to void the FCC's fine for the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show.<ref>{{cite web|last=Eggerton|first=John|title=CBS' Janet Jackson Fine Thrown Out|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/cbs-janet-jackson-fine-thrown-out-32831|work=Broadcasting & Cable|date=July 21, 2008|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> TV series that the PTC has targeted for FCC complaints in 2008 have included NBC's '']'' morning show and CBS primetime programs '']'', '']'', and '']''. Profanity was the main concern for ''Today'' and ''Big Brother 10'',<ref>{{cite press release|title=CBS's 'Big Brother' Drops an F-Bomb on Families|url=http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/news/release/2008/0806.asp|publisher=PTC|date=August 6, 2008|access-date=November 27, 2008|archive-date=August 11, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080811220204/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/news/release/2008/0806.asp|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite press release|title=PTC Slams NBC for Airing Yet Another Unbleeped Profanity on the Today Show|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/news/release/2008/0911.asp|publisher=PTC|date=September 11, 2008|access-date=November 27, 2008}}</ref> the extremely brief exposure of contestant Marcus Lehman's penis for ''Survivor: Gabon'',<ref>{{cite news|last=de Moraes|first=Lisa|title='Survivor' Reveals a Bit Too Much for Watchdog Group|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/01/AR2008100103062.html|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=October 2, 2008|page=C7|access-date=September 7, 2017|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062605/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/10/01/AR2008100103062.html|url-status=live}}</ref> and a "lap-dance" scene for ''Two and a Half Men''.<ref>{{cite press release|title=PTC: CBS Crosses Indecency Line with 'Two and a Half Men'|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/news/release/2008/1022.asp|publisher=PTC|date=October 22, 2008}}</ref> The PTC's first complaint in 2009 was over sexual content in an episode of '']'' titled "]".<ref>{{cite news|url= https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-outraged-over-family-guy-episode-55790|title=PTC Outraged Over 'Family Guy' Episode|last=Eggerton|first=John|date=March 11, 2009|work=Broadcasting & Cable|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=March 16, 2010|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20100316192410/http://www.broadcastingcable.com/article/189799-PTC_Outraged_Over_Family_Guy_Episode.php|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2009/03/foxs-family-guy-has-parents-television-council-seeing-red-indecency-complaint-reflects-ptcs-renewed-.html |title=Fox's "Family Guy" has Parents Television Council seeing red; indecency complaint reflects PTC's renewed activism |last=Boedeker |first=Hal |date=March 11, 2009 |work=Orlando Sentinel |access-date=March 11, 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090315073720/http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_tv_tvblog/2009/03/foxs-family-guy-has-parents-television-council-seeing-red-indecency-complaint-reflects-ptcs-renewed-.html |archive-date=March 15, 2009 }}</ref> Later in 2009, the PTC urged affiliates of ] to pre-empt a '']'' episode to be aired November 9; the episode would reportedly contain a ] scene.<ref>{{cite news|url= https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-pushes-stations-preempt-gossip-girl-35700|title=PTC Pushes Stations To Preempt 'Gossip Girl'|last=Eggerton|first=John|date=November 3, 2009|work=Broadcasting & Cable|access-date=November 8, 2009|archive-date=July 7, 2021|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210707232035/https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-pushes-stations-preempt-gossip-girl-35700|url-status=live}}</ref> In response to ]'s performance of his song "]" at the end of the ] broadcast on ABC, PTC urged viewers to complain to the FCC if living in an area where the performance was shown before 10 p.m. local time. PTC complained that the performance contained a simulation of ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-upset-over-adam-lambert-ama-performance-56798|title=PTC Upset Over Adam Lambert AMA Performance|last=Eggerton|first=John|date= November 23, 2009|work=Broadcasting & Cable|access-date=August 21, 2022|archive-date=November 26, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091126052841/http://www.broadcastingcable.com:80/article/390281-PTC_Upset_Over_Adam_Lambert_AMA_Performance.php|url-status=dead}}</ref> Lambert's performance reportedly was broadcast around 11 p.m. Eastern and Pacific time, "outside the FCC's usual 6am-10pm time frame prohibiting the broadcast of indecent material".<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-news/adam-lamberts-amas-performance-draws-1500-complaints-250192/ |title=Adam Lambert's AMAs Performance Draws 1,500 Complaints |magazine=Rolling Stone |date=November 24, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20160109182609/http://www.rollingstone.com/music/news/adam-lamberts-amas-performance-draws-1-500-complaints-20091124 |archive-date=January 9, 2016|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> ABC also received about 1,500 telephoned complaints.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://music.yahoo.com/adam-lambert/news/abc-lamberts-performance-draws-1-500-complaints--61996642 |title=ABC: Lambert's performance draws 1,500 complaints |date=November 23, 2009 |work=Yahoo! Music |publisher=Associated Press |access-date=November 23, 2009 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120612080914/http://music.yahoo.com/adam-lambert/news/abc-lamberts-performance-draws-1-500-complaints--61996642|archive-date= June 12, 2012}}</ref> | ||
In January 2010, the PTC launched a complaint campaign after the '']'' episode "]" aired in January 2010. The FCC fined Fox $25,000 on June 4, stating that they failed to respond to an inquiry of 100,000 complaints about the episode.<ref>{{cite news|last=Johnson|first=Ted|title=FCC fines Fox over 'American Dad' episode|url=https://variety.com/2010/scene/markets-festivals/fcc-fines-fox-over-american-dad-episode-1118020180/|work=Variety|date=June 4, 2010|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> A month later, Fox slammed the decision, claiming that it was "unconstitutional".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/fox-fcc-american-dad-inquiry-unconstitutional-36567|title=Fox to FCC: 'American Dad' Inquiry is Unconstitutional|work=Broadcasting & Cable|access-date=April 18, 2022|date=July 6, 2010}}</ref> On May 20, 2010, the PTC announced that it plans to target CBS and its affiliates after the network announced that the new sitcom '']'' was added to the 2010-2011 fall TV lineup. The PTC cites both the show's title and its Thursday 8:30 pm timeslot as reasons. The series is based on the popular ] ] created by Justin Halpern, who also served as one of the co-producers on the show. CBS defended its decision and said that it was working with the account's creator and its content was toned down for the program before the series premiere in September.<ref>{{cite web|last=Eggerton|first=John|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-takes-aim-my-dad-says-36450|title=PTC Takes Aim At '$#*! My Dad Says'|work=Broadcasting & Cable|date=May 20, 2010|access-date=April 18, 2022 |
In January 2010, the PTC launched a complaint campaign after the '']'' episode "]" aired in January 2010. The FCC fined Fox $25,000 on June 4, stating that they failed to respond to an inquiry of 100,000 complaints about the episode.<ref>{{cite news|last=Johnson|first=Ted|title=FCC fines Fox over 'American Dad' episode|url=https://variety.com/2010/scene/markets-festivals/fcc-fines-fox-over-american-dad-episode-1118020180/|work=Variety|date=June 4, 2010|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> A month later, Fox slammed the decision, claiming that it was "unconstitutional".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/fox-fcc-american-dad-inquiry-unconstitutional-36567|title=Fox to FCC: 'American Dad' Inquiry is Unconstitutional|work=Broadcasting & Cable|access-date=April 18, 2022|date=July 6, 2010}}</ref> On May 20, 2010, the PTC announced that it plans to target CBS and its affiliates after the network announced that the new sitcom '']'' was added to the 2010-2011 fall TV lineup. The PTC cites both the show's title and its Thursday 8:30 pm timeslot as reasons. The series is based on the popular ] ] created by Justin Halpern, who also served as one of the co-producers on the show. CBS defended its decision and said that it was working with the account's creator and its content was toned down for the program before the series premiere in September.<ref>{{cite web|last=Eggerton|first=John|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-takes-aim-my-dad-says-36450|title=PTC Takes Aim At '$#*! My Dad Says'|work=Broadcasting & Cable|date=May 20, 2010|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> | ||
In October 2010, the PTC targeted an episode of the ] series '']'', stating that the episode featured outfits that were scantily clad and guest-star ] going shopping in lingerie, calling it, "an endorsement of narcotics abuse, public masturbation, and school-sanctioned burlesque." They were also criticizing it for making an episode idolizing Britney in the first place, stating: "Perhaps most troubling is the deification of a troubled popstar into a symbol of empowerment and self-esteem."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2010/10/britney-spears-glee-ripped-by-parents-television-council|title=Britney Spears, Glee Torn a New One By Parents Television Council|date=October 8, 2010|publisher=The Hollywood Gossip}}</ref> On October 20, PTC criticized '']'' magazine for featuring three ''Glee'' stars posing in risque outfits; the PTC statement said that the photoshoot "borders on ]."<ref name="NYT2010" /><ref>{{cite magazine|last=Hibberd|first=James|title=Sexy 'Glee' Photos Draw 'Pedophilia' Protests|url=https://www.billboard.com/music/music-news/sexy-glee-photos-draw-pedophilia-protests-953207/|magazine=Billboard|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130405215518/http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/953207/sexy-glee-photos-draw-pedophilia-protests|archive-date=April 5, 2013|date=October 20, 2010|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> | In October 2010, the PTC targeted an episode of the ] series '']'', stating that the episode featured outfits that were scantily clad and guest-star ] going shopping in lingerie, calling it, "an endorsement of narcotics abuse, public masturbation, and school-sanctioned burlesque." They were also criticizing it for making an episode idolizing Britney in the first place, stating: "Perhaps most troubling is the deification of a troubled popstar into a symbol of empowerment and self-esteem."<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://www.thehollywoodgossip.com/2010/10/britney-spears-glee-ripped-by-parents-television-council|title=Britney Spears, Glee Torn a New One By Parents Television Council|date=October 8, 2010|publisher=The Hollywood Gossip}}</ref> On October 20, PTC criticized '']'' magazine for featuring three ''Glee'' stars posing in risque outfits; the PTC statement said that the photoshoot "borders on ]."<ref name="NYT2010" /><ref>{{cite magazine|last=Hibberd|first=James|title=Sexy 'Glee' Photos Draw 'Pedophilia' Protests|url=https://www.billboard.com/music/music-news/sexy-glee-photos-draw-pedophilia-protests-953207/|magazine=Billboard|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130405215518/http://www.billboard.com/articles/news/953207/sexy-glee-photos-draw-pedophilia-protests|archive-date=April 5, 2013|date=October 20, 2010|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> | ||
Line 104: | Line 108: | ||
In January 2011, the PTC called on the ] and the ] of both houses of Congress to investigate whether ] violated ] in casting teenaged actors in '']'', a remake of the ]. MTV rated ''Skins'' "TV-MA", meaning the show is not suitable for audiences under 17.<ref>{{cite news|last=de Moraes|first=Lisa|title=Racy 'Skins' prompts Parents Television Council to call for investigation|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/20/AR2011012005397.html|access-date=January 25, 2011|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=January 21, 2011|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062541/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/20/AR2011012005397.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The '']'' responded in an editorial: "...looking for government remedies is ineffective and unwise; we suspect the network's editors are smart enough to skirt prosecution. The Federal Communications Commission doesn't regulate the content of cable networks, and even if it did, a crackdown on shows like "Skins" would be a bad idea, because adults should be able to watch whatever they like on cable and federal attempts to protect kids from adult programming have never been successful."<ref>{{cite news|title=Parents vs. 'Skins'|url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-xpm-2011-jan-22-la-ed-mtv-20110122-story.html|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=January 22, 2011|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062626/https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-xpm-2011-jan-22-la-ed-mtv-20110122-story.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | In January 2011, the PTC called on the ] and the ] of both houses of Congress to investigate whether ] violated ] in casting teenaged actors in '']'', a remake of the ]. MTV rated ''Skins'' "TV-MA", meaning the show is not suitable for audiences under 17.<ref>{{cite news|last=de Moraes|first=Lisa|title=Racy 'Skins' prompts Parents Television Council to call for investigation|url=https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/20/AR2011012005397.html|access-date=January 25, 2011|newspaper=The Washington Post|date=January 21, 2011|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062541/https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/20/AR2011012005397.html|url-status=live}}</ref> The '']'' responded in an editorial: "...looking for government remedies is ineffective and unwise; we suspect the network's editors are smart enough to skirt prosecution. The Federal Communications Commission doesn't regulate the content of cable networks, and even if it did, a crackdown on shows like "Skins" would be a bad idea, because adults should be able to watch whatever they like on cable and federal attempts to protect kids from adult programming have never been successful."<ref>{{cite news|title=Parents vs. 'Skins'|url=https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-xpm-2011-jan-22-la-ed-mtv-20110122-story.html|newspaper=Los Angeles Times|date=January 22, 2011|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062626/https://www.latimes.com/opinion/editorials/la-xpm-2011-jan-22-la-ed-mtv-20110122-story.html|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
In August 2020, the PTC requested that ] remove the film '']'' from its ].<ref name="VarietyMcNary">{{cite news|last=McNary|first=Dave|date= |
In August 2020, the PTC requested that ] remove the film '']'' from its ].<ref name="VarietyMcNary">{{cite news|last=McNary|first=Dave|date=August 20, 2020|title=Netflix Apologizes for 'Inappropriate' 'Cuties' Poster Slammed for 'Sexualizing' Little Girls|work=Variety|url=https://variety.com/2020/film/news/netflix-cuties-sexualizing-girls-1234741510/|url-status=live|access-date=August 20, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200820200935/https://variety.com/2020/film/news/netflix-cuties-sexualizing-girls-1234741510/|archive-date=August 20, 2020}}</ref> | ||
===Advertising=== | ===Advertising=== | ||
In May 2005 ] introduced its "Spicy BBQ Six Dollar Burger" in a television advertisement featuring celebrity ] in a swimsuit, soaping up a ] while leaning on it, and then eating the burger. A similar ad with Hilton for ] hamburger chain was aired in June 2005. | In May 2005 ] introduced its "Spicy BBQ Six Dollar Burger" in a television advertisement featuring celebrity ] in a swimsuit, soaping up a ] while leaning on it, and then eating the burger. A similar ad with Hilton for ] hamburger chain was aired in June 2005. | ||
The Parents Television Council and other media watchdog groups criticized the commercial for being shown during programs that were very likely to be watched by children. Melissa Caldwell, PTC research director, said, "This commercial is basically ]. The way she moves, the way she puts her finger in her mouth—it's very suggestive and very titillating."<ref>{{cite news| last = James| first = Meg| title = Critics are saying 'That's Too Hot' of sexy Carl's Jr. ad| work = ]| date = |
The Parents Television Council and other media watchdog groups criticized the commercial for being shown during programs that were very likely to be watched by children. Melissa Caldwell, PTC research director, said, "This commercial is basically ]. The way she moves, the way she puts her finger in her mouth—it's very suggestive and very titillating."<ref>{{cite news| last = James| first = Meg| title = Critics are saying 'That's Too Hot' of sexy Carl's Jr. ad| work = ]| date = May 24, 2005| url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-may-24-fi-paris24-story.html | access-date = April 18, 2022| archive-date = December 30, 2020| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062451/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-may-24-fi-paris24-story.html| url-status = live}}</ref> The group mobilized more than one million members to contact the restaurant chain and voice their concern and claimed that "f this television commercial were to go unchallenged it would set a new standard for acceptable television commercial content." Caldwell, then-president Bozell, and then-executive director Winter appeared on various news programs such as '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']'' to discuss this issue.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/campaigns/TVads/main.asp|title=TV Ads: Advertiser and Network Campaign|publisher=Parents Television Council|year=2005|access-date=August 25, 2009|archive-date=June 20, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090620091113/http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/campaigns/TVads/main.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref> ], CEO of Carl's Jr., says the group needs to "get a life ... This isn't ]—there is no nipple shield in this," referring to the ]. He continued, "There is no nudity, there is no sex act — it's a beautiful model in a swimsuit washing a car."<ref>{{cite news| last = Silver| first = Caleb| title = No apologies for sexy Paris Hilton ad| publisher = CNN| date = June 1, 2005| url = https://money.cnn.com/2005/05/24/news/newsmakers/carls_ad/| access-date = June 28, 2007| archive-date = December 30, 2020| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062458/https://money.cnn.com/2005/05/24/news/newsmakers/carls_ad/| url-status = live}}</ref> In addition to featuring the ad on their web site, Carl's Jr. also set up another website playing a longer version of the commercial. | ||
PTC accused television commercials for Hardee's "biscuit holes" food product of suggesting double entendres. The commercial featured consumers suggesting "]" and "B-holes" as nicknames for the biscuit holes. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, which owned 350 Hardee's restaurants in four states, refused to show the ads in its respective markets.<ref>{{cite news|last=Wolf|first=Alan M.|url=http://www.news-record.com/content/2009/07/23/article/hardees_ads_too_racy_for_nc_consumers|title=Hardee's ads too racy for N.C. consumers|work=Raleigh News & Observer|publisher=McClatchy News Service|date=July 23, 2009|access-date=June 7, 2010}}</ref> Ben Mayo Boddie, chairman of Boddie-Noell, wrote a letter to the PTC condemning the ads as well.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nydailynews.com/news/money/hardee-ad-rejected-reviewers-choose-a-holes-b-holes-article-1.430718|title=Hardee's ad rejected for asking reviewers to choose between "A-holes" and "B-holes"|last=Roberts|first=Christine|date= |
PTC accused television commercials for Hardee's "biscuit holes" food product of suggesting double entendres. The commercial featured consumers suggesting "]" and "B-holes" as nicknames for the biscuit holes. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, which owned 350 Hardee's restaurants in four states, refused to show the ads in its respective markets.<ref>{{cite news|last=Wolf|first=Alan M.|url=http://www.news-record.com/content/2009/07/23/article/hardees_ads_too_racy_for_nc_consumers|title=Hardee's ads too racy for N.C. consumers|work=Raleigh News & Observer|publisher=McClatchy News Service|date=July 23, 2009|access-date=June 7, 2010}}</ref> Ben Mayo Boddie, chairman of Boddie-Noell, wrote a letter to the PTC condemning the ads as well.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.nydailynews.com/news/money/hardee-ad-rejected-reviewers-choose-a-holes-b-holes-article-1.430718|title=Hardee's ad rejected for asking reviewers to choose between "A-holes" and "B-holes"|last=Roberts|first=Christine|date=July 23, 2009|work=New York Daily News|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> | ||
===World Wrestling Federation campaign and lawsuit=== | ===World Wrestling Federation campaign and lawsuit=== | ||
In 1999, the PTC launched a campaign against the World Wrestling Federation (WWF), now ] (WWE), complaining that their '']'' program contained levels of sexuality and violence unbecoming prime time programming.<ref>{{cite news|last=Gordon|first=Devin|date= |
In 1999, the PTC launched a campaign against the World Wrestling Federation (WWF), now ] (WWE), complaining that their '']'' program contained levels of sexuality and violence unbecoming prime time programming.<ref>{{cite news|last=Gordon|first=Devin|date=December 13, 1999|title=WWF Tones Down Its 'Smackdown' Act|work=Newsweek|url=https://www.newsweek.com/wwf-tones-down-its-smackdown-act-162738|url-status=live|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062429/https://www.newsweek.com/wwf-tones-down-its-smackdown-act-162738|archive-date=December 30, 2020}}</ref> In the campaign, Bozell said that four children had been killed by peers emulating ] moves learned from the program.<ref>{{cite web|date=June 1, 2000|title=PTC Calls MCI Worldcom to the Mat - archived on 31 October 2001|url=http://www.parentstv.org/publications/release/pr20000601.html|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20011106164514/http://www.parentstv.org/publications/release/pr20000601.html|archive-date=November 6, 2001|work=Internet Archive Wayback Machine|publisher=Parents Television Council}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Dempsey|first=John|date=May 28, 2001|title=WWF wins round 1 against parents org|work=Variety|url=https://variety.com/2001/biz/news/wwf-wins-round-1-against-parents-org-1117800064/|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref><ref name="WWF wins Round 1">{{cite news|date=May 28, 2001|title=News Shorts - WWF wins Round 1 against parents group|work=Media Life Magazine|url=http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/may01/may28/3_wed/news7wednesday.html|url-status=dead|access-date=June 16, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061025050900/http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2001/may01/may28/3_wed/news7wednesday.html|archive-date=October 25, 2006}}</ref> With these allegations, Bozell and various PTC members began meeting with representatives of the advertising departments of various companies that advertised on ''SmackDown!'' to persuade them to withdraw sponsorship. The PTC also suggested that between 30 and 40 advertisers had pulled their commercials from WWF programming, an assertion that was not true.<ref name="WWF wins Round 1"/><ref name="judgereject">{{cite press release|title=Judge rejects Parents Television Council motion to Dismiss Lawsuit|publisher=]|date=May 24, 2001|url=http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2001/2001_05_24.jsp|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090609225904/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2001/2001_05_24.jsp|archive-date=June 9, 2009}}</ref> | ||
On November 9, 2000, the WWF filed a lawsuit against the PTC in the ], claiming that the PTC's statements were false and constituted ].<ref>{{cite press release|title=Suit Filed Against L. Brent Bozell III, Media Research Center|publisher=]|date=2000 |
On November 9, 2000, the WWF filed a lawsuit against the PTC in the ], claiming that the PTC's statements were false and constituted ].<ref>{{cite press release|title=Suit Filed Against L. Brent Bozell III, Media Research Center|publisher=]|date=November 9, 2000|url=http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2000/2000_11_09.jsp|access-date=August 8, 2007|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070814190918/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2000/2000_11_09.jsp|archive-date=August 14, 2007}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|date=November 10, 2000|title=WWF Sues Media Watchdog Group|work=Los Angeles Times|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2000-nov-10-fi-49770-story.html|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> The WWF also filed a ] lawsuit against the PTC for using clips from WWF programs in their promotional videos.<ref name="judgereject"/> The PTC filed for dismissal of the suit, but on May 24, 2001, ] Judge ] denied the PTC's motion on the basis that the WWF's lawsuit had merit.<ref name="judgereject"/> The PTC and the WWF settled out of court and, as part of the settlement agreement, the PTC paid the WWF $3.5 million ] and Bozell issued a public apology,<ref name="Issues Apology">{{cite press release|title=World Wrestling Entertainment Settles Lawsuit With Parents Television Council; Founder Brent Bozell Issues Apology|publisher=]|date=July 8, 2002|url=http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2002/2002_07_08.jsp|access-date=June 16, 2009|url-status=dead|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090609225920/http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2002/2002_07_08.jsp|archive-date=June 9, 2009}}</ref> stating that it was wrong to blame the World Wrestling Federation or any of its programs for the deaths of children and that the original statements had been based on what was later found to be false information designed by people close to the ] case to blame the death of Tiffany Eunick on the WWF.<ref>{{cite press release|title=World Wrestling Entertainment Settles Lawsuit With Parents Television Council; PTC Founder Brent Bozell Issues Apology.|url=http://www.thefreelibrary.com/World+Wrestling+Entertainment+Settles+Lawsuit+With+Parents+Television...-a088554235|date=July 8, 2002|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=June 16, 2009}}</ref> | ||
The PTC |
The PTC would be satirized in WWF programming by ], a ] of ] led by ] who objected to rowdy, risqué, and "]" activities.<ref>{{Cite web|title=Steven Richards discusses the politics of Right To Censor|url=https://slamwrestling.net/index.php/2000/11/07/the-politics-of-right-to-censor/|access-date=October 30, 2021|website=Slam Wrestling|date=November 7, 2000 |language=en-US}}</ref><ref name="btr167">{{cite book|last1=Fritz|first1=Brian|title=Between the Ropes: Wrestling's Greatest Triumphs and Failures|last2=Murray|first2=Christopher|publisher=]|year=2006|isbn=978-1-55022-726-0|page=167}}</ref><ref name="steelchair148">{{cite book|last=Sammond|first=Nicholas|title=Steel Chair to the Head|publisher=]|year=2005|isbn=978-0-8223-3438-5|page=148}}</ref> | ||
===In-flight entertainment=== | ===In-flight entertainment=== | ||
In September 2007, the PTC launched a campaign to get ] in America to reduce the number of "PG-13" and "R"-rated films shown as ]. Consequently, ], ] representative of ], introduced the Family Friendly Flights Act of 2007 bill to require airlines to set aside "child-safe" viewing areas for families to sit in planes.<ref>{{cite news|last=Eggerton|first=John|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-seeks-flight-video-guidelines-54029|title=PTC Seeks In-Flight-Video Guidelines|work=Broadcasting & Cable|date=2007 |
In September 2007, the PTC launched a campaign to get ] in America to reduce the number of "PG-13" and "R"-rated films shown as ]. Consequently, ], ] representative of ], introduced the Family Friendly Flights Act of 2007 bill to require airlines to set aside "child-safe" viewing areas for families to sit in planes.<ref>{{cite news|last=Eggerton|first=John|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-seeks-flight-video-guidelines-54029|title=PTC Seeks In-Flight-Video Guidelines|work=Broadcasting & Cable|date=September 28, 2007|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> The bill never became law. | ||
===YouTube=== | ===YouTube=== | ||
Twice has the PTC targeted video-hosting website ] in its campaigns and statements. PTC called for NBC to reconsider uploading the uncensored clip of the '']'' novelty song "]" on NBC's site and YouTube channel.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.eonline.com/news/54026/ptc_puts_nbc_on_naughty_list|title=PTC Puts NBC on Naughty List|last=Hall|first=Sarah|date= |
Twice has the PTC targeted video-hosting website ] in its campaigns and statements. PTC called for NBC to reconsider uploading the uncensored clip of the '']'' novelty song "]" on NBC's site and YouTube channel.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.eonline.com/news/54026/ptc_puts_nbc_on_naughty_list|title=PTC Puts NBC on Naughty List|last=Hall|first=Sarah|date=December 22, 2006|publisher=E! Online|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062630/https://www.eonline.com/news/54026/ptc_puts_nbc_on_naughty_list|url-status=live}}</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Lipschultz|2008|p=178}}</ref> In 2008, the PTC released a report ''The "New" Tube: A Content Analysis of YouTube—the Most Popular Online Video Destination'', which praised YouTube for filtering adult content but criticized the site for not filtering profanity and other explicit content from comments sections or videos.<ref>{{cite web|url=https://arstechnica.com/old/content/2008/12/ptc-goes-after-youtube-user-comments.ars|title=Decency group goes after YouTube users' comments|last=Lasar|first=Matthew|date=December 21, 2008|work=Ars Technica|access-date=August 5, 2009|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062457/https://arstechnica.com/uncategorized/2008/12/ptc-goes-after-youtube-user-comments/|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
===Ethics controversy=== | ===Ethics controversy=== | ||
Line 129: | Line 133: | ||
===Other=== | ===Other=== | ||
The PTC also criticized '']'' for not meeting "family viewing" guidelines and suggested a boycott, based on the mockumentary format of the series including mentions of plastic surgery, "inside" business language being used in a crude manner, and the Muppets in a bar consuming alcoholic beverages.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://w2.parentstv.org/Main/News/Detail.aspx?docID=3296|title=New PTC Research Finds ABC's The Muppets Exposes Kids to Adult-Themed Content Every 3 Minutes|last=Oliver|first=Kelley|work=Parents Television Council|date=October 20, 2015|access-date=October 25, 2015}}</ref> | The PTC also criticized '']'' for not meeting "family viewing" guidelines and suggested a boycott, based on the mockumentary format of the series including mentions of plastic surgery, "inside" business language being used in a crude manner, and the Muppets in a bar consuming alcoholic beverages.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://w2.parentstv.org/Main/News/Detail.aspx?docID=3296|title=New PTC Research Finds ABC's The Muppets Exposes Kids to Adult-Themed Content Every 3 Minutes|last=Oliver|first=Kelley|work=Parents Television Council|date=October 20, 2015|access-date=October 25, 2015|archive-date=November 17, 2015|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20151117020558/http://w2.parentstv.org/Main/News/Detail.aspx?docID=3296|url-status=dead}}</ref> | ||
The PTC also criticized ]'s '']'', deeming it "an affront to families, toxic to advertisers, and a clear demonstration of a badly-broken business model that forces every cable/satellite subscriber to pay for unwanted and unwatched cable networks."<ref>{{Cite news | url= |
The PTC also criticized ]'s '']'', deeming it "an affront to families, toxic to advertisers, and a clear demonstration of a badly-broken business model that forces every cable/satellite subscriber to pay for unwanted and unwatched cable networks."<ref>{{Cite news | url=https://www.foxnews.com/entertainment/parents-group-slams-sex-box-basic-cable-show/ | title=Parents group slams 'Sex Box' basic cable show | first=Diana | last=Falzone | publisher=] | date=January 29, 2015 }}</ref> | ||
==Viewpoints== | ==Viewpoints== | ||
{{Conservatism US}} | |||
On its website, PTC states that its mission is to "promote and restore responsibility and decency to the entertainment industry in answer to America's demand for positive, family-oriented television programming."<ref>{{cite web|title=What is the PTC's mission?|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/faqs/main.asp#What%20is%20the%20PTCs%20mission|work=FAQ|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date= |
On its website, PTC states that its mission is to "promote and restore responsibility and decency to the entertainment industry in answer to America's demand for positive, family-oriented television programming."<ref>{{cite web|title=What is the PTC's mission?|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/faqs/main.asp#What%20is%20the%20PTCs%20mission|work=FAQ|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=June 12, 2007|archive-date=July 3, 2007|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070703152145/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/faqs/main.asp#What%20is%20the%20PTCs%20mission|url-status=live}}</ref> The PTC believes that the entertainment industry—not only television but also music, movies, and video games as well—and its sponsors share responsibility with parents for children's television viewing habits. It therefore believes that television is harming children through a perceived "gratuitous" amount of sex, violence, and profanity.<ref name="about us"/> Its activism has influenced the removal of potentially objectionable content from certain shows, such as the fourth season of the popular CBS crime drama '']''.<ref>{{cite news|last=Battaglio |first=Stephen |title="CSI" Goes for Less Seamy Side |url=http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/entertainment/2003/09/25/2003-09-25__csi__goes_for_less_seamy_si.html |work=] |date=September 25, 2003 |access-date=March 15, 2008 |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090220222326/http://www.nydailynews.com/archives/entertainment/2003/09/25/2003-09-25__csi__goes_for_less_seamy_si.html |archive-date=February 20, 2009 }}</ref> Increased government regulation of broadcasting is another viewpoint supported by PTC.<ref name="Television Watch">{{cite press release | ||
|title = TV Watch Statement on Government's Role in Controlling What's on TV | |title = TV Watch Statement on Government's Role in Controlling What's on TV | ||
|publisher = Television Watch | |publisher = Television Watch | ||
|date = |
|date = June 15, 2006 | ||
|url = http://www.televisionwatch.org/NewsPolls/PressReleases/PR004.html | |url = http://www.televisionwatch.org/NewsPolls/PressReleases/PR004.html | ||
|archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070927015425/http://www.televisionwatch.org/NewsPolls/PressReleases/PR004.html | |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070927015425/http://www.televisionwatch.org/NewsPolls/PressReleases/PR004.html | ||
|url-status = dead | |url-status = dead | ||
|archive-date = |
|archive-date = September 27, 2007 | ||
|access-date = |
|access-date = June 19, 2007 | ||
}}</ref> PTC considers itself ];<ref name="about us">{{cite web|title=About Us|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/aboutus/main.asp |
}}</ref> PTC considers itself ];<ref name="about us">{{cite web|title=About Us|url=http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/aboutus/main.asp|publisher=Parents Television Council|access-date=December 31, 2007|archive-date=January 17, 2008|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080117052116/http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/aboutus/main.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref><ref>{{cite news|last=Nelson|first=Colleen McCain|url=http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002451506_parents25.html|title=Networks prepare to take on parents in showdown over TV programming|work=The Seattle Times|date=August 20, 2005|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110622083512/http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/2002451506_parents25.html|archive-date=June 22, 2011}} Originally published by ''The Dallas Morning News'' as "Networks rebelling against Mom, Dad."</ref> others have considered the PTC to be ]<ref>{{cite news|last=Campbell|first=Julia|url=https://abcnews.go.com/print?id=123179|title=Lieberman in Hollywood: Will He Be Welcome?|publisher=ABC News|date=August 10, 2000|access-date=August 27, 2007|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062641/https://abcnews.go.com/print?id=123179|url-status=live}}</ref> or ].<ref>{{cite news|last=Smith|first=Lynn|title=For 'indecency' watchdogs, work is a day full of TV|url=https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-may-10-et-watchdog10-story.html|work=Los Angeles Times|date=May 10, 2004|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062550/https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-may-10-et-watchdog10-story.html|url-status=live}}</ref> ] of the ''St. Petersburg Times'' called the PTC "the ] of public advocacy" in a column of hers and believed the PTC supported a federal policy on broadcast decency she called "Big Nanny run amok".<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.tampabay.com/archive/2007/06/10/the-nanny-inside-your-tv/|title=The nanny inside your TV|last=Blumner|first=Robyn|author-link=Robyn Blumner|date=June 10, 2007|work=Tampa Bay Times|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> | ||
===TV Parental Guidelines=== | ===TV Parental Guidelines=== | ||
Since the introduction of the ] ratings system, the PTC has frequently accused the guidelines of having inaccuracy and low standards. In 1997, PTC was twice as likely to rate a show with the toughest rating classification, "red light" in the PTC's case, and "TV-14" in the Guidelines.<ref>{{harvnb|Price|1998|p=143}}</ref> Bill Berkowitz quoted PTC president Bozell as stating, based on PTC research, that "the current ratings system and ] are failures."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mediatransparency.org/story.php?storyID=62|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060427133850/http://www.mediatransparency.org/story.php?storyID=62|url-status=dead|archive-date= |
Since the introduction of the ] ratings system, the PTC has frequently accused the guidelines of having inaccuracy and low standards. In 1997, PTC was twice as likely to rate a show with the toughest rating classification, "red light" in the PTC's case, and "TV-14" in the Guidelines.<ref>{{harvnb|Price|1998|p=143}}</ref> Bill Berkowitz quoted PTC president Bozell as stating, based on PTC research, that "the current ratings system and ] are failures."<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.mediatransparency.org/story.php?storyID=62|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20060427133850/http://www.mediatransparency.org/story.php?storyID=62|url-status=dead|archive-date=April 27, 2006|title=The Parents Television Council|last=Berkowitz|first=Bill|date=May 11, 2005|publisher=Media Transparency|access-date=March 15, 2009}}</ref> In response to a V-Chip advertising campaign in the summer of 2006, Bozell proposed instead that cable companies either apply FCC-style broadcast television standards or offer choice in ordering channels.<ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.cnet.com/news/parents-group-derides-v-chip-ads/|title=Parents group derides V-Chip ads|last=Ogg|first=Erica|date=July 27, 2006|work=CNET News|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062501/https://www.cnet.com/news/parents-group-derides-v-chip-ads/|url-status=live}}</ref> ] considers PTC's reporting on the V-chip inaccurate and ideologically charged.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.televisionwatch.org/newspolls/pressreleases/pr016.html|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927015418/http://www.televisionwatch.org/newspolls/pressreleases/pr016.html|url-status=dead|archive-date=September 27, 2007|title=Parents Want Control of TV|publisher=TV Watch|date=March 15, 2007|access-date=April 22, 2007}}</ref> | ||
===Cable choice=== | ===Cable choice=== | ||
{{Further|Family and Consumer Choice Act of 2007}} | {{Further|Family and Consumer Choice Act of 2007}} | ||
The PTC is an avid supporter of "]" ] services to allow families to choose only the cable television channels that are appropriate for their children, and also impose the same decency standards already in place on broadcast television on cable channels.<ref>{{cite web | last = Winter | first = Tim | title = Cable Choice is the Right Choice | work = ParentsTV.org | publisher = Parents Television Council | url = http://parentstv.org/PTC/cable/documents/TWCableChoice.asp | access-date = 2007- |
The PTC is an avid supporter of "]" ] services to allow families to choose only the cable television channels that are appropriate for their children, and also impose the same decency standards already in place on broadcast television on cable channels.<ref>{{cite web | last = Winter | first = Tim | title = Cable Choice is the Right Choice | work = ParentsTV.org | publisher = Parents Television Council | url = http://parentstv.org/PTC/cable/documents/TWCableChoice.asp | access-date = June 28, 2007 | archive-date = May 2, 2007 | archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070502021857/http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/cable/documents/TWCableChoice.asp | url-status = dead }}</ref> Frequently, the council has criticized programs on ], ], ], ], ],<ref>{{cite web| last = Eggerton| first = John| title = PTC Doesn't Want Its MTV| work = ] |date=February 1, 2005 | url = https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-doesnt-want-its-mtv-76912| access-date = April 18, 2022 }}</ref> ], ], and ] because they claim some of the content aired on those channels is inappropriate for younger viewers.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://parentstv.org/PTC/cable/archives.asp|title=Cable Consumer Choice Campaign|publisher=PTC|access-date=February 22, 2009|archive-date=January 6, 2009|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090106154140/http://www.parentstv.org./PTC/cable/archives.asp|url-status=dead}}</ref> On the other side of the issue, the PTC has awarded its "Seal of Approval" to cable networks ]<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/news/release/2007/0308.asp|title=PTC Awards Disney for Family-Friendly Advertising Practices|publisher=Parents Television Council|date=March 8, 2007|access-date=April 12, 2007}}</ref> and ]<ref>{{cite web| title = Review - Naomi's New Morning| work = ParentsTV.org| publisher = Parents Television Council| date = May 4, 2007| url = http://www.parentstv.org/PTC/publications/reviews/naomisnewmorning.asp| archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20070203194342/http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/publications/reviews/naomisnewmorning.asp| url-status = dead| archive-date = February 3, 2007| access-date = August 24, 2009}}</ref> for their original programs several years ago. | ||
On June 14, 2007, United States Representatives ] (], ]) and ] (], ]) introduced into legislation the Family and Consumer Choice Act of 2007, which intends to allow families to choose and pay for only the cable television channels that they want to watch. In September 2007, the PTC launched a new website, ''HowCableShouldBe.com'', to allow cable customers to see how much they are paying for their monthly cable bill currently.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/news/release/2007/0925.asp|title=PTC Shows Consumers How Cable Should Be |publisher= Parents Television Council|date=2007 |
On June 14, 2007, United States Representatives ] (], ]) and ] (], ]) introduced into legislation the Family and Consumer Choice Act of 2007, which intends to allow families to choose and pay for only the cable television channels that they want to watch. In September 2007, the PTC launched a new website, ''HowCableShouldBe.com'', to allow cable customers to see how much they are paying for their monthly cable bill currently.<ref>{{cite press release|url=http://www.parentstv.org/ptc/news/release/2007/0925.asp|title=PTC Shows Consumers How Cable Should Be |publisher= Parents Television Council|date=September 25, 2007|access-date=October 12, 2007}}</ref> | ||
In August 2013, the PTC released a statement criticizing MTV for the airing of a performance by ] during its ] and urged Congress to pass the Television Consumer Freedom Act.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Strecker|first=Erin|title=Parents Television Council isn't happy with Miley Cyrus' VMAs performance|url=https://ew.com/article/2013/08/26/parents-television-council-miley-cyrus-vmas/|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062611/https://ew.com/article/2013/08/26/parents-television-council-miley-cyrus-vmas/|url-status=live}}</ref> | In August 2013, the PTC released a statement criticizing MTV for the airing of a performance by ] during its ] and urged Congress to pass the Television Consumer Freedom Act.<ref>{{cite magazine|last=Strecker|first=Erin|title=Parents Television Council isn't happy with Miley Cyrus' VMAs performance|url=https://ew.com/article/2013/08/26/parents-television-council-miley-cyrus-vmas/|magazine=Entertainment Weekly|access-date=April 18, 2022|archive-date=December 30, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20201230062611/https://ew.com/article/2013/08/26/parents-television-council-miley-cyrus-vmas/|url-status=live}}</ref> | ||
==Popular music== | ==Popular music== | ||
In April 2008, PTC released ''The Rap on Rap'', a study covering hip-hop and R&B music videos rotated on programs '']'' and '']'', both shown on ], and '']'' on ]. PTC urged advertisers to withdraw sponsorship of those programs, whose videos PTC stated targeted children and teenagers "with adult content ... once every 38 seconds".<ref>{{cite web|last1=Moss|first1=Linda|last2=Umstead|first2=R. Thomas|title=PTC Puts a Bad 'Rap' On BET, MTV|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-puts-bad-rap-bet-mtv-268081|work=Multichannel |date= |
In April 2008, PTC released ''The Rap on Rap'', a study covering hip-hop and R&B music videos rotated on programs '']'' and '']'', both shown on ], and '']'' on ]. PTC urged advertisers to withdraw sponsorship of those programs, whose videos PTC stated targeted children and teenagers "with adult content ... once every 38 seconds".<ref>{{cite web|last1=Moss|first1=Linda|last2=Umstead|first2=R. Thomas|title=PTC Puts a Bad 'Rap' On BET, MTV|url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-puts-bad-rap-bet-mtv-268081|work=Multichannel |date=April 10, 2008|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref><ref>{{cite web |last=Crupi |first=Anthony |title=PTC Blasts MTV, BET |url=http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/media_agencies/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003788641 |work=Mediaweek |date=April 10, 2008 |access-date=January 2, 2011 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080422053803/http://www.mediaweek.com/mw/news/media_agencies/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003788641 |archive-date=April 22, 2008 |url-status=dead }}</ref> PTC also warned radio stations about playing the ] song "]" over concerns it contained an audible use of an obscenity.<ref>{{cite news |url=https://www.nexttv.com/news/ptc-cautions-media-about-britney-spears-song-55548 |title=PTC Cautions Media About Britney Spears Song |last=Eggerton |first=John |date=January 21, 2009 |work=Broadcasting & Cable |access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> In response to the music video to ]' song "]", the PTC stated that it felt it was "unfortunate that she would participate in such a sexualized video like this one"; ironically, Miley Cyrus' father ] sat on the PTC Advisory Board at the time.<ref name="NYT2010"/> | ||
In May 2011, the PTC took issue with ]'s music video for her song "]." In the video ] portrays a woman who resorts to killing the man who had previously raped her. They claimed the video promoted gun crime and murder, while the pop star said she wanted to be a voice to victims. After the video became the most viewed ] video that week, ]<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.nme.com/news/music/rihanna-221-1281048|title=Rihanna thanks US pressure groups for making 'Man Down' a success|magazine=NME|date=June 11, 2011|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> | In May 2011, the PTC took issue with ]'s music video for her song "]." In the video ] portrays a woman who resorts to killing the man who had previously raped her. They claimed the video promoted gun crime and murder, while the pop star said she wanted to be a voice to victims. After the video became the most viewed ] video that week, ]<ref>{{cite magazine|url=https://www.nme.com/news/music/rihanna-221-1281048|title=Rihanna thanks US pressure groups for making 'Man Down' a success|magazine=NME|date=June 11, 2011|access-date=April 18, 2022}}</ref> | ||
Line 164: | Line 169: | ||
The PTMC has been frequently criticized for hypocrisy, slanted reporting and only criticizing shows that are aimed at adults. Critics of the PTMC have alleged that it supports increased governmental censorship of television by lobbying the FCC for indecency enforcement for certain television shows<ref name="Television Watch"/> and inaccurately reporting on the ] in order to further their agenda.<ref>. TV Watch. March 15, 2007. Retrieved April 22, 2007.</ref> | The PTMC has been frequently criticized for hypocrisy, slanted reporting and only criticizing shows that are aimed at adults. Critics of the PTMC have alleged that it supports increased governmental censorship of television by lobbying the FCC for indecency enforcement for certain television shows<ref name="Television Watch"/> and inaccurately reporting on the ] in order to further their agenda.<ref>. TV Watch. March 15, 2007. Retrieved April 22, 2007.</ref> | ||
'']'' creator ], who |
'']'' creator ], who the PTMC frequently criticizes, said in '']''<ref name="BGFM">{{cite journal |last1=Voss |first1=Brandon |year=2008|title=Big Gay Following: Seth MacFarlane |journal= The Advocate}}</ref> | ||
{{blockquote|Oh, yeah. That's like getting hate mail from ]. They're literally terrible human beings. I've read their newsletter, I've visited their website, and they're just rotten to the core. For an organization that prides itself on Christian values—I mean, I'm an atheist, so what do I know?—they spend their entire day hating people. They can all suck my dick as far as I'm concerned.}} | {{blockquote|Oh, yeah. That's like getting hate mail from ]. They're literally terrible human beings. I've read their newsletter, I've visited their website, and they're just rotten to the core. For an organization that prides itself on Christian values—I mean, I'm an atheist, so what do I know?—they spend their entire day hating people. They can all suck my dick as far as I'm concerned.}} | ||
], creator of '']'' responded to Bozell's article that attacked the season 6 premiere of his show due to it including a school shooting scene, calling the PTC "a hate club" and Bozell an "idiot" as well as "a pathetic fucking douchebag and I bet your own kids fucking hate you.”<ref>{{Cite web |date= |title=Kurt Sutter's content: Dear Mr. Bozell, Yes, I oft…" on WhoSay |url=http://www.whosay.com/status/kurtsutter/735490?wsref=tw&code=UyF6NMb |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150129160030/http://www.whosay.com/status/kurtsutter/735490?wsref=tw&code=UyF6NMb |archive-date=2015-01-29 |access-date= |website=www.whosay.com}}</ref> | |||
⚫ | In January 2005, ] associate professor Christian Christiansen questioned the backgrounds of certain PTC Advisory Board members, contending they are not consistent with their stance on morality.<ref name="Christensen" /> Christiansen's observations were as follows: ] as 'National Finance Chairman for the 1992 "Buchanan for President" campaign' of "neo-fascist ]"; ]'s portrayal of adulterous ] on TV series '']'', which series "was soaked in scantily-clad women, emotional cruelty, violence, alcoholism, and marital infidelity"; Coleman Luck as 'writer and producer' ... 'on |
||
⚫ | In January 2005, ] associate professor Christian Christiansen questioned the backgrounds of certain PTC Advisory Board members, contending they are not consistent with their stance on morality.<ref name="Christensen" /> Christiansen's observations were as follows: ] as 'National Finance Chairman for the 1992 "Buchanan for President" campaign' of "neo-fascist ]"; ]'s portrayal of adulterous ] on TV series '']'', which series "was soaked in scantily-clad women, emotional cruelty, violence, alcoholism, and marital infidelity"; Coleman Luck as 'writer and producer' ... 'on '']'', '']'', '']'', '']'', and '']'' ... included a fair amount of death and violence'; ] as "a popular guest at a number of Las Vegas casinos"; ] appearing in "less family-friendly products... such as '']'', '']'' and '']''; ], who starred in '']'' made by filmmaker ]; and John Carvelli, 'who, in 1987, "took part in a fact-finding mission in ] and ] with the National Conservative Foundation during the ]."'<ref name="Christensen" /> | ||
⚫ | In a December 2005 column of his, '']'' columnist Simon Dumenco claimed that the PTC is "very very afraid of gay TV characters".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Dumenco |first1=Simon |title=Honey, I Shrank the Cable-TV Universe |url=https://adage.com/article/the-media-guy/honey-i-shrank-cable-tv-universe/47749 |url-access=subscription |work=Ad Age |date= |
||
⚫ | In a December 2005 column of his, '']'' columnist Simon Dumenco claimed that the PTC is "very very afraid of gay TV characters".<ref>{{cite news |last1=Dumenco |first1=Simon |title=Honey, I Shrank the Cable-TV Universe |url=https://adage.com/article/the-media-guy/honey-i-shrank-cable-tv-universe/47749 |url-access=subscription |work=Ad Age |date=December 12, 2005 }}</ref> ''Culture Watch'' columnist Christopher Gildemeister defended the PTC as being "not homophobic" but simply opposed to "sexual references or innuendo (of any variety, hetero, homo or other) aired where children might be exposed to them."<ref name="culture watch 12 26"/> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Line 207: | Line 214: | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] | ||
] | |||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Latest revision as of 01:18, 28 December 2024
Non-profit advocacy group in the United States This article is about the nonprofit group that rates TV shows. For the TV guidelines and list of advisories, see TV Parental Guidelines.
Abbreviation | PTMC |
---|---|
Formation | 1995; 30 years ago (1995) |
Founder | L. Brent Bozell III |
Type | Advocacy group |
Focus | "Bringing back responsibility and family values to the entertainment industry" |
Headquarters | Alexandria, Virginia and Los Angeles, California |
Location |
|
Method | Media attention, direct-appeal campaigns |
Membership | 12,000 (disputed) |
President | Jon Yasuda |
President emeritus | Tim Winter |
Website | parentstv |
Formerly called | Parents Television Council (1995-2021) |
The Parents Television and Media Council (PTMC), formerly the Parents Television Council (PTC), is an American media advocacy group founded by conservative political pundit L. Brent Bozell III in 1995, which advocates for what it considers to be responsible, family-friendly content across all media platforms, and for advertisers to be held accountable for the content of television programs that they sponsor. The PTMC officially describes itself as a non-partisan organization, although the group has also been described as partisan and socially conservative.
The PTMC produces reviews, research reports, and online newsletters that highlight television programs and other entertainment products (such as music videos and video games) based on their suitability for family viewing. The PTMC has advocated for cable television networks to be subject to the same decency rules as broadcast television, and for television providers to allow subscribers to purchase channels on an individual basis. The group has also been critical of the TV Parental Guidelines system, often deeming the ratings given by broadcasters to be inaccurate in comparison to their own assessments of a program's content.
It has mounted pressure campaigns against the producers, broadcasters, and sponsors of programming that they perceive to be indecent or harmful to children (such as those containing undue sexual content, profane language, and violence); these campaigns typically include the organized mass mailing of form letters and emails to advertising sponsors of unapproved programs, organized mass filing of complaints via the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) website complaint form, and direct threats of long, potentially costly FCC license challenges to local network affiliates planning to broadcast what the council considers harmful network programming.
Throughout its existence, the Parents Television and Media Council has been accused of promoting censorship. In 2004, the FCC reported that the group was the primary source of most content complaints received by the commission.
History
In 1989, the Media Research Center (MRC) began monitoring the entertainment industry for alleged liberal bias through its Entertainment Division and newsletter TV, etc. MRC founder and president L. Brent Bozell III later felt that "decency" was declining on most prime-time television programming. The PTC began operations in 1995 following private planning meetings with Charlton Heston, Michael Medved, and others in the entertainment industry, who would eventually make up the advisory board of the PTC. After the release of its first annual Family Guide to Prime-Time Television following the 1995–1996 television season, the PTC hoped to hold the entertainment industry accountable for the indecency that it perceived to be prominent on prime-time television. By 1996, the organization had the support of several members of the U.S. Congress, including Joe Lieberman and Lamar S. Smith, and an estimated annual budget of $142,000.
By 1998, with an estimated membership of 120,000, comedian and former The Tonight Show host Steve Allen joined PTC as its Honorary Chairman, and PTC released a report questioning the accuracy of the TV Parental Guidelines ratings system and campaigning for advertisers to stop sponsoring programs that the PTC claimed were offensive. Allen launched a newspaper advertisement campaign promoting the PTC, which was published in many outlets including The New York Times. The PTC was noted for criticizing such shows as Ally McBeal, Dawson's Creek, Ellen, Friends, and Spin City. Its website was also introduced that year, and its annual budget had already surpassed $1 million. PTC rolled out another round of full-page newspaper advertisements in 1999; San Francisco Examiner television columnist Tim Goodman perceived Allen and the PTC of advocating complete censorship of television to allow only what PTC considered "Family-Safe TV".
The PTC lost nearly $1 million in 2008 and in 2009 received $2.9 million in revenue, a 29 percent drop from the previous year. In 2009 and 2010, the PTC cut its staff by 38 percent to save money.
On April 14, 2021, the organization changed its name to the Parents Television and Media Council "to better reflect its mission to advocate for responsible entertainment on all entertainment media platforms".
Leadership
PTC was founded in 1995 by longtime political activist L. Brent Bozell III. Bozell is a prominent conservative activist who has, among other things, served as executive director of the Conservative Victory Committee, a political action committee that has supported the election of dozens of conservative candidates. He was also National Finance Chairman for Pat Buchanan's 1992 presidential campaign, and later president of the National Conservative Political Action Committee. Bozell was succeeded as PTC President by Timothy F. Winter. Winter served as executive director of the PTC for three years prior to becoming president. Prior to joining the PTC, Mr. Winter's 20-year career as a media executive included positions with Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer and NBC. Until 2015 when his position was terminated, Dan Isett, Director of Corporate and Government Affairs of the PTC, represented the PTC on the Consumer Advisory Committee of the Federal Communications Commission.
Advisory board
The PTC also has an advisory board consisting of politicians and entertainers working to assist the council in their goal of protecting children against profanity and violence in the media. Notable members of the advisory board have included singer Pat Boone, former football player Mel Renfro, writer-producer Coleman Luck, country musician Billy Ray Cyrus, comedian and actor Tim Conway of CBS's The Carol Burnett Show, former U.S. Senator from Kansas and 2008 presidential candidate Sam Brownback, film critic Michael Medved, star of 1980s soap opera Dallas Susan Howard, and ION Television producer Gary Johnson. In addition, the PTC has established numerous local chapters for most American media markets. Notable former advisory board members include - both of whom are now deceased - comedian Steve Allen, original host of NBC's The Tonight Show, and C. Delores Tucker, participant in the Civil Rights Movement and activist against gangsta rap music; Allen is now given the title of National Honorary Chairman-Emeritus. Bahçeşehir University associate professor Christian Christiansen questioned the backgrounds of certain PTC advisory board members as not consistent with their stance on morality.
Publications
Columns and reports
The website of the PTC features reports on what the group says is harmful content on television and regular writings from its staff. Their research is done with the support of their Entertainment Tracking System, an archive of prime-time television programming that they claim is the largest in the world. Such publications include:
- "Culture Watch" – Throughout 2005 and 2006, the PTC published columns under this series authored by Christopher Gildemeister, covering the influence on American culture by entertainment as well as exposing the increase in sex, violence, and profanity in cable television and the methods used by advertisers and broadcasting companies to attract young audiences. In a December 2005 column of his, Advertising Age columnist Simon Dumenco criticized the PTC, arguing that the PTC is "very very afraid of gay TV characters". Gildemeister defended the PTC as being "not homophobic" but simply opposed to "sexual references or innuendo (of any variety, hetero, homo or other) aired where children might be exposed to them."
- "Parenting and the Media" authored by Rod Gustafson, where he offers advice on parenting children who frequent the media.
- "TV Trends" – Another column by Christopher Gildemeister, published since October 2007 intending to inform parents and TV viewers in general about what he determines to be "harmful or questionable prime-time programming." Hartford Courant television critic Roger Catlin quoted Gildemeister as criticizing ABC for having an "apparent fetish for transsexuals" in certain programs.
- Former president Bozell's weekly entertainment column, which it links to within the home page
In 2000, PTC's report What a Difference a Decade Makes allegedly stated that there was an increase in profanity, sex, and violence on television during the 1990s. The report also claimed that references to homosexuality increased the most during that decade – by a factor of 24. In 2002, the PTC released a report claiming that there was an increase in profanity on network programming shown during the first hour of prime time. In a 2006 report titled Wolves in Sheep's Clothing, analyst Kristen Fyfe reported an increase in violent, profane, and sexual content in children's programming. Among its results, based on research during summer 2005, the PTC stated that Teen Titans was the most violent program, and claimed Cartoon Network had the most violent incidents. Richard Huff of the New York Daily News criticized the report for misinterpreting an episode of SpongeBob SquarePants, "Sailor Mouth", over its intent to satirize profanity implicitly.
Following the 2005–06 television season, PTC issued a report Faith in a Box that analyzed depictions of religion in primetime television. The study stated that most positive references to religion were on reality shows such as Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, while claiming that scripted shows tended to be more negative towards it. The report also ranked Fox as the "most anti-religious network", followed by NBC, UPN, ABC, CBS, and the WB. In 2008, PTC published a report titled Happily Never After, using analysis of several primetime shows early in the 2007-2008 television season that asserted that extramarital sex was more favored on television shows during that time period. Ian O'Doherty of The Irish Independent asked regarding the PTC's marriage depiction study: "After all, would you rather watch people having fun or would you rather watch a realistic depiction of marriage, which ... would simply be an hour of two people sullenly chewing their food, pausing occasionally only to throw each other filthies and occasionally grumbling under their breath how the biggest regret of their life was ever setting eyes on you and that their mother was right all along?" PTC released a report in October 2009 stating that prime-time television shows on broadcast networks had twice as many depictions of violence against women in 2009 than in 2004.
In November 2010, the PTC released a study, Habitat for Profanity: Broadcast TV's Sharp Increase in Foul Language, which claims that there was a sharp rise in the usage of profanity between 2005 and 2010—during the 8 pm to 9 pm ET/PT time period commonly referred to them as the Family Viewing Hour, the PTC claimed that there were 111 instances of profanity during this hour in 2010 versus 10 in 2005; during all of prime time, 276 instances in 2010 against 11 in 2005. The study claimed that there was a 69.3% increase in prime time in general between 2005 and 2010, with the Fox network being heavily accused of bringing a 269% increase for the network during that period. The study also claimed instances in which there was profanity, but the offending word was bleeped out.
Entertainment reviews and analysis
The PTC's activities extend to evaluation, rating, and educating around broadcast TV programs according to a traffic light system across three categories of sex, violence and profanity, accumulating to an overall rating based on the ratings of these three categories. The guide has been in use since the 1995–96 season using the traffic light system. In the PTC's definition of its traffic light system, green light indicates that the program is "appropriate for all ages", a yellow light indicates that the program "would be unsuitable for children under the age of 14", and a red light indicates that the program is "appropriate for adult audiences only".
Every television season since 1995–96, the council has released a list of the best and worst prime-time television programs for family viewing. The PTC's website includes the guide from the 1996-97 season at the earliest. Starting with the 2005–2006 season, their list was based on their traffic light system as well as Nielsen Media Research ratings of viewership among children ages 2–17 of certain shows. Popular shows that have frequently been praised as the most family-friendly programs on television include George Lopez, 7th Heaven, Touched by an Angel, Home Improvement, Family Matters, Sabrina the Teenage Witch, Boy Meets World, Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, American Idol, Dancing with the Stars, NBC Sunday Night Football, Deal or No Deal, and Who Wants to Be a Millionaire. Popular shows frequently named "Worst of the Season" include American Dad!, CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, House, South Park, Two and a Half Men, Ally McBeal, Dawson's Creek, Grey's Anatomy, The Drew Carey Show, Family Guy, Friends, The O.C., Spin City, That '70s Show and Will and Grace.
On a weekly basis, the PTC publishes reviews of what they consider to be the best and worst television programming for family viewing, authored by the various entertainment analysts at the council. Seth MacFarlane, creator of Family Guy, compared the PTC's frequent negative reviews of the series to "hate mail from Hitler" and "They're literally terrible human beings. I've read their newsletter, I've visited their website, and they're just rotten to the core. For an organization that prides itself on 'Christian' values ... they spend their entire day hating people." MacFarlane became a target again when the PTC protested the Academy Awards' decision to have him host the 85th ceremony. "So You Think You Can Rate a TV Show?", the title being a play on the title of Fox television series So You Think You Can Dance, is a weekly column the PTC began in July 2007 to claim that networks inaccurately rate their shows based on the TV Parental Guidelines, whether the network applied the improper age-based rating (such as TV-PG or TV-14) or failed to include the proper content descriptors (such as "L" for language or "V" for violence).
Seal of Approval
To recognize excellence in the media, the Parents Television Council awards its Seal of Approval to television shows, movies, home products, and advertisers that provide or sponsor content it deems to be "family-friendly". It is divided into two categories: Entertainment and Advertiser. Popular television shows that have been awarded include 7th Heaven, American Idol, Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, Everybody Loves Raymond, George Lopez, JAG, Reba, Smallville, Touched by an Angel, The West Wing, The Wonderful World of Disney, and most recently, When Calls the Heart. Also receiving the Entertainment Seal of Approval are TiVo's KidZone television filtering service, The Jimmy Wilson Films Children's Adventure Series, the Sky Angel Christian television service, and the CleanFlicks DVD filtering product.
Activism
Broadcast indecency
In 2003, the PTC unsuccessfully campaigned for the FCC to take action against the NBC television network in response to the use of the word "fucking" by Bono, lead singer for the rock band U2, during the network's January 2003 telecast of the Golden Globe Awards. Among an audience of nearly 20 million, the FCC received only 234 complaints, 217 of which came from the PTC. In October 2003, the FCC decided not to fine NBC because Bono's obscenity was ruled as fleeting and not describing sexual or excretory functions, the FCC's standard for fining a network for indecency. After the PTC filed an Application for Review to the FCC, in March 2004 the FCC decided that the word was indecent by law but still decided not to fine NBC; however, the ruling was to serve as a warning to networks that there would be a "zero tolerance" policy towards obscene language willfully used during the daytime. However, the PTC's complaints about profanity used by presenter Nicole Richie in the December 10, 2003, broadcast of the Billboard Music Awards led the FCC to conclude that the language violated decency law.
The PTC began attracting more attention after it filed around 65,000 complaints to the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) about the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show, in which one of performer Janet Jackson's nipple shielded breasts, was exposed for 9/16ths of a second. FCC chairman Michael Powell stated that the number of indecency complaints to the FCC had risen from 350 in the years 2000 and 2001, to 14,000 in 2002 and 240,000 in 2003. It was also found that the PTC had generated most of the indecency complaints received by the Federal Communications Commission. In July 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit voided the fine.
After the halftime show, the PTC launched five more FCC complaint drives, starting March 2004 with an episode of Fox's That '70s Show titled "Happy Jack", which revolved around character Eric Forman being caught masturbating. The beginning of the 2004–2005 television season sparked four new campaigns, the first being against NBC's animated series Father of the Pride, stating that it contained a "barrage of sexual innuendo and profanity" while being promoted "from the creators of Shrek", which they felt would potentially attract children to watching the series. That campaign led to over 11,000 email complaints to the FCC. Later, shortly after CBS broadcast the word "fuck" during an airing of Big Brother 5, the PTC took action again, this time claiming that CBS ignored a warning from the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) that there would be zero tolerance toward unbleeped profanity. However, those complaints became moot when Viacom, then-owners of CBS, settled with the FCC for $3.5 million regarding all allegedly indecent programming broadcast in the years around 2003 and 2004, including the Big Brother 5 episode in question. In March 2006, the FCC ruled that Father of the Pride was not indecent. Following were complaints about an October 2004 episode of ABC's short-lived teen drama Life As We Know It, which the PTC felt was sexually charged.
The PTC started off 2005 with their campaign against the Without a Trace episode "Our Sons and Daughters", leading to CBS being fined for indecency in March 2006; the PTC objected to the depiction of teenagers participating in an orgy in that episode. CBS argued that the episode "featured an important and socially relevant storyline warning parents to exercise greater supervision of their teenagers." The FCC fined CBS $3.63 million in March 2006 for this episode, but after a court settlement, the network agreed to pay $300,000 in fines. At the end of January 2005, the FCC rejected a set of complaints that PTC filed between October 2001 and February 2004 for allegedly indecent programs such as NBC's Friends, the WB's Gilmore Girls, and Fox's The Simpsons. The FCC received complaints from the PTC in the summer over an unedited broadcast of the lyric "who the fuck are you?" in The Who's song "Who Are You" from the Live 8 concert broadcast July 2, 2005, on ABC stations on the East Coast.
In 2006, PTC requested that the FCC deny broadcast license renewal for Salt Lake City CBS station KUTV because they felt that the broadcast of the Without a Trace episode that was ruled indecent violated community standards and that CBS failed to take action to reduce indecent content following the FCC fines. Subsequently, CBS agreed to pay the FCC $300,000 to settle the KUTV license challenge. Starting from December 2007, the organization demanded that CBS cancel its plan to rebroadcast an edited version of the Showtime drama Dexter, whose title character was a serial killer and police forensics analyst, because it felt that the program would glorify murder even with the edits. By early February 2008, the Council claimed to have collected 17,000 complaints to CBS.
On January 25, 2008, the FCC proposed an estimated $1.4 million fine against ABC for a scene of female nudity in the NYPD Blue episode "Nude Awakening" aired on February 25, 2003. Because the episode aired outside the indecency "safe harbor" in the Central and Mountain Time Zones, the fine applied only to ABC stations in those zones. The PTC praised the FCC's action. However, PTC president Winter condemned ABC's decision to appeal the fine in federal court. PTC has also criticized the Third Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to void the FCC's fine for the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime show. TV series that the PTC has targeted for FCC complaints in 2008 have included NBC's Today morning show and CBS primetime programs Big Brother 10, Survivor: Gabon, and Two and a Half Men. Profanity was the main concern for Today and Big Brother 10, the extremely brief exposure of contestant Marcus Lehman's penis for Survivor: Gabon, and a "lap-dance" scene for Two and a Half Men. The PTC's first complaint in 2009 was over sexual content in an episode of Family Guy titled "Family Gay". Later in 2009, the PTC urged affiliates of The CW to pre-empt a Gossip Girl episode to be aired November 9; the episode would reportedly contain a threesome scene. In response to Adam Lambert's performance of his song "For Your Entertainment" at the end of the 2009 American Music Awards broadcast on ABC, PTC urged viewers to complain to the FCC if living in an area where the performance was shown before 10 p.m. local time. PTC complained that the performance contained a simulation of oral sex. Lambert's performance reportedly was broadcast around 11 p.m. Eastern and Pacific time, "outside the FCC's usual 6am-10pm time frame prohibiting the broadcast of indecent material". ABC also received about 1,500 telephoned complaints.
In January 2010, the PTC launched a complaint campaign after the American Dad! episode "Don't Look a Smith Horse in the Mouth" aired in January 2010. The FCC fined Fox $25,000 on June 4, stating that they failed to respond to an inquiry of 100,000 complaints about the episode. A month later, Fox slammed the decision, claiming that it was "unconstitutional". On May 20, 2010, the PTC announced that it plans to target CBS and its affiliates after the network announced that the new sitcom $#*! My Dad Says was added to the 2010-2011 fall TV lineup. The PTC cites both the show's title and its Thursday 8:30 pm timeslot as reasons. The series is based on the popular Twitter account created by Justin Halpern, who also served as one of the co-producers on the show. CBS defended its decision and said that it was working with the account's creator and its content was toned down for the program before the series premiere in September.
In October 2010, the PTC targeted an episode of the Fox series Glee, stating that the episode featured outfits that were scantily clad and guest-star Britney Spears going shopping in lingerie, calling it, "an endorsement of narcotics abuse, public masturbation, and school-sanctioned burlesque." They were also criticizing it for making an episode idolizing Britney in the first place, stating: "Perhaps most troubling is the deification of a troubled popstar into a symbol of empowerment and self-esteem." On October 20, PTC criticized GQ magazine for featuring three Glee stars posing in risque outfits; the PTC statement said that the photoshoot "borders on pedophilia."
In January 2011, the PTC called on the United States Department of Justice and the Judiciary Committees of both houses of Congress to investigate whether MTV violated child pornography laws in casting teenaged actors in Skins, a remake of the British TV series of the same name. MTV rated Skins "TV-MA", meaning the show is not suitable for audiences under 17. The Los Angeles Times responded in an editorial: "...looking for government remedies is ineffective and unwise; we suspect the network's editors are smart enough to skirt prosecution. The Federal Communications Commission doesn't regulate the content of cable networks, and even if it did, a crackdown on shows like "Skins" would be a bad idea, because adults should be able to watch whatever they like on cable and federal attempts to protect kids from adult programming have never been successful."
In August 2020, the PTC requested that Netflix remove the film Cuties from its streaming service.
Advertising
In May 2005 Carl's Jr. introduced its "Spicy BBQ Six Dollar Burger" in a television advertisement featuring celebrity Paris Hilton in a swimsuit, soaping up a Bentley Arnage while leaning on it, and then eating the burger. A similar ad with Hilton for Hardee's hamburger chain was aired in June 2005. The Parents Television Council and other media watchdog groups criticized the commercial for being shown during programs that were very likely to be watched by children. Melissa Caldwell, PTC research director, said, "This commercial is basically soft-core porn. The way she moves, the way she puts her finger in her mouth—it's very suggestive and very titillating." The group mobilized more than one million members to contact the restaurant chain and voice their concern and claimed that "f this television commercial were to go unchallenged it would set a new standard for acceptable television commercial content." Caldwell, then-president Bozell, and then-executive director Winter appeared on various news programs such as Good Morning America, Today, The Early Show, American Morning, and The O'Reilly Factor to discuss this issue. Andy Puzder, CEO of Carl's Jr., says the group needs to "get a life ... This isn't Janet Jackson—there is no nipple shield in this," referring to the Super Bowl XXXVIII halftime-show controversy. He continued, "There is no nudity, there is no sex act — it's a beautiful model in a swimsuit washing a car." In addition to featuring the ad on their web site, Carl's Jr. also set up another website playing a longer version of the commercial.
PTC accused television commercials for Hardee's "biscuit holes" food product of suggesting double entendres. The commercial featured consumers suggesting "A-holes" and "B-holes" as nicknames for the biscuit holes. Boddie-Noell Enterprises, which owned 350 Hardee's restaurants in four states, refused to show the ads in its respective markets. Ben Mayo Boddie, chairman of Boddie-Noell, wrote a letter to the PTC condemning the ads as well.
World Wrestling Federation campaign and lawsuit
In 1999, the PTC launched a campaign against the World Wrestling Federation (WWF), now World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE), complaining that their SmackDown! program contained levels of sexuality and violence unbecoming prime time programming. In the campaign, Bozell said that four children had been killed by peers emulating professional wrestling moves learned from the program. With these allegations, Bozell and various PTC members began meeting with representatives of the advertising departments of various companies that advertised on SmackDown! to persuade them to withdraw sponsorship. The PTC also suggested that between 30 and 40 advertisers had pulled their commercials from WWF programming, an assertion that was not true.
On November 9, 2000, the WWF filed a lawsuit against the PTC in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, claiming that the PTC's statements were false and constituted defamation. The WWF also filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against the PTC for using clips from WWF programs in their promotional videos. The PTC filed for dismissal of the suit, but on May 24, 2001, U.S. district court Judge Denny Chin denied the PTC's motion on the basis that the WWF's lawsuit had merit. The PTC and the WWF settled out of court and, as part of the settlement agreement, the PTC paid the WWF $3.5 million USD and Bozell issued a public apology, stating that it was wrong to blame the World Wrestling Federation or any of its programs for the deaths of children and that the original statements had been based on what was later found to be false information designed by people close to the Lionel Tate case to blame the death of Tiffany Eunick on the WWF.
The PTC would be satirized in WWF programming by The Right to Censor, a group of heels led by Steven Richards who objected to rowdy, risqué, and "hardcore" activities.
In-flight entertainment
In September 2007, the PTC launched a campaign to get airlines in America to reduce the number of "PG-13" and "R"-rated films shown as in-flight entertainment. Consequently, Heath Shuler, Democratic representative of North Carolina, introduced the Family Friendly Flights Act of 2007 bill to require airlines to set aside "child-safe" viewing areas for families to sit in planes. The bill never became law.
YouTube
Twice has the PTC targeted video-hosting website YouTube in its campaigns and statements. PTC called for NBC to reconsider uploading the uncensored clip of the Saturday Night Live novelty song "Dick in a Box" on NBC's site and YouTube channel. In 2008, the PTC released a report The "New" Tube: A Content Analysis of YouTube—the Most Popular Online Video Destination, which praised YouTube for filtering adult content but criticized the site for not filtering profanity and other explicit content from comments sections or videos.
Ethics controversy
In October 2010, The New York Times reported that former PTC vice president of development Patrick W. Salazar had accused PTC of mishandling hundreds of thousands of mailings to donors and members. Based on Internal Revenue Service filings, the American Institute of Philanthropy rated PTC "C+" on financial efficiency. Salazar also disputed the PTC's official membership figure of 1.3 million and estimated that at most 12,000 people respond to annual fundraisers. Although Salazar stated that he left the PTC in November 2009, the PTC said that it fired Salazar and that Salazar was trying to extort money from the organization.
Other
The PTC also criticized The Muppets for not meeting "family viewing" guidelines and suggested a boycott, based on the mockumentary format of the series including mentions of plastic surgery, "inside" business language being used in a crude manner, and the Muppets in a bar consuming alcoholic beverages.
The PTC also criticized WE tv's Sex Box, deeming it "an affront to families, toxic to advertisers, and a clear demonstration of a badly-broken business model that forces every cable/satellite subscriber to pay for unwanted and unwatched cable networks."
Viewpoints
On its website, PTC states that its mission is to "promote and restore responsibility and decency to the entertainment industry in answer to America's demand for positive, family-oriented television programming." The PTC believes that the entertainment industry—not only television but also music, movies, and video games as well—and its sponsors share responsibility with parents for children's television viewing habits. It therefore believes that television is harming children through a perceived "gratuitous" amount of sex, violence, and profanity. Its activism has influenced the removal of potentially objectionable content from certain shows, such as the fourth season of the popular CBS crime drama CSI: Crime Scene Investigation. Increased government regulation of broadcasting is another viewpoint supported by PTC. PTC considers itself nonpartisan; others have considered the PTC to be bipartisan or socially conservative. Robyn Blumner of the St. Petersburg Times called the PTC "the Gladys Kravitz of public advocacy" in a column of hers and believed the PTC supported a federal policy on broadcast decency she called "Big Nanny run amok".
TV Parental Guidelines
Since the introduction of the TV Parental Guidelines ratings system, the PTC has frequently accused the guidelines of having inaccuracy and low standards. In 1997, PTC was twice as likely to rate a show with the toughest rating classification, "red light" in the PTC's case, and "TV-14" in the Guidelines. Bill Berkowitz quoted PTC president Bozell as stating, based on PTC research, that "the current ratings system and V-chip are failures." In response to a V-Chip advertising campaign in the summer of 2006, Bozell proposed instead that cable companies either apply FCC-style broadcast television standards or offer choice in ordering channels. Television Watch considers PTC's reporting on the V-chip inaccurate and ideologically charged.
Cable choice
Further information: Family and Consumer Choice Act of 2007The PTC is an avid supporter of "a la carte" cable television services to allow families to choose only the cable television channels that are appropriate for their children, and also impose the same decency standards already in place on broadcast television on cable channels. Frequently, the council has criticized programs on BET, Comedy Central, E!, FX, MTV, Spike, TNT, and VH1 because they claim some of the content aired on those channels is inappropriate for younger viewers. On the other side of the issue, the PTC has awarded its "Seal of Approval" to cable networks Disney Channel and Hallmark Channel for their original programs several years ago.
On June 14, 2007, United States Representatives Dan Lipinski (Democratic, Illinois) and Jeff Fortenberry (Republican, Nebraska) introduced into legislation the Family and Consumer Choice Act of 2007, which intends to allow families to choose and pay for only the cable television channels that they want to watch. In September 2007, the PTC launched a new website, HowCableShouldBe.com, to allow cable customers to see how much they are paying for their monthly cable bill currently.
In August 2013, the PTC released a statement criticizing MTV for the airing of a performance by Miley Cyrus during its Video Music Awards and urged Congress to pass the Television Consumer Freedom Act.
Popular music
In April 2008, PTC released The Rap on Rap, a study covering hip-hop and R&B music videos rotated on programs 106 & Park and Rap City, both shown on BET, and Sucker Free on MTV. PTC urged advertisers to withdraw sponsorship of those programs, whose videos PTC stated targeted children and teenagers "with adult content ... once every 38 seconds". PTC also warned radio stations about playing the Britney Spears song "If U Seek Amy" over concerns it contained an audible use of an obscenity. In response to the music video to Miley Cyrus' song "Who Owns My Heart", the PTC stated that it felt it was "unfortunate that she would participate in such a sexualized video like this one"; ironically, Miley Cyrus' father Billy Ray Cyrus sat on the PTC Advisory Board at the time.
In May 2011, the PTC took issue with Rihanna's music video for her song "Man Down." In the video Rihanna portrays a woman who resorts to killing the man who had previously raped her. They claimed the video promoted gun crime and murder, while the pop star said she wanted to be a voice to victims. After the video became the most viewed YouTube video that week, she sarcastically used Twitter to thank the PTC in helping her make the video such a success.
Criticism
The PTMC has been frequently criticized for hypocrisy, slanted reporting and only criticizing shows that are aimed at adults. Critics of the PTMC have alleged that it supports increased governmental censorship of television by lobbying the FCC for indecency enforcement for certain television shows and inaccurately reporting on the V-Chip in order to further their agenda.
Family Guy creator Seth MacFarlane, who the PTMC frequently criticizes, said in The Advocate
Oh, yeah. That's like getting hate mail from Hitler. They're literally terrible human beings. I've read their newsletter, I've visited their website, and they're just rotten to the core. For an organization that prides itself on Christian values—I mean, I'm an atheist, so what do I know?—they spend their entire day hating people. They can all suck my dick as far as I'm concerned.
Kurt Sutter, creator of Sons of Anarchy responded to Bozell's article that attacked the season 6 premiere of his show due to it including a school shooting scene, calling the PTC "a hate club" and Bozell an "idiot" as well as "a pathetic fucking douchebag and I bet your own kids fucking hate you.”
In January 2005, Bahçeşehir University associate professor Christian Christiansen questioned the backgrounds of certain PTC Advisory Board members, contending they are not consistent with their stance on morality. Christiansen's observations were as follows: L. Brent Bozell III as 'National Finance Chairman for the 1992 "Buchanan for President" campaign' of "neo-fascist Pat Buchanan"; Susan Howard's portrayal of adulterous Donna Culver Krebbs on TV series Dallas, which series "was soaked in scantily-clad women, emotional cruelty, violence, alcoholism, and marital infidelity"; Coleman Luck as 'writer and producer' ... 'on Otherworld, The Equalizer, Gabriel's Fire, Matrix, and The Burning Zone ... included a fair amount of death and violence'; William Bennett as "a popular guest at a number of Las Vegas casinos"; Bruce Jarchow appearing in "less family-friendly products... such as The Puppet Masters, Mad Dog and Glory and Married... with Children; Billy Ray Cyrus, who starred in Mulholland Drive made by filmmaker David Lynch; and John Carvelli, 'who, in 1987, "took part in a fact-finding mission in Nicaragua and Honduras with the National Conservative Foundation during the Nicaraguan civil war."'
In a December 2005 column of his, Advertising Age columnist Simon Dumenco claimed that the PTC is "very very afraid of gay TV characters". Culture Watch columnist Christopher Gildemeister defended the PTC as being "not homophobic" but simply opposed to "sexual references or innuendo (of any variety, hetero, homo or other) aired where children might be exposed to them."
See also
- Anti-pornography movement
- Criticism of Family Guy
- Parents Music Resource Center
- "Think of the children"
References
- Green, Philip (2005). Primetime Politics: The Truth about Conservative Lies, Corporate Control, and Television Culture. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield. ISBN 0-7425-2107-9.
- Lane, Frederick S. (2006). The Decency Wars: The Campaign to Cleanse American Culture. Amherst, New York, U.S.: Prometheus Books. ISBN 1-59102-427-7.
- Lipschultz, Jeremy Harris (2008). Broadcast and Internet Indecency. New York, New York, U.S.: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-8058-5910-2.
- Price, Monroe Edwin (1998). The V-chip Debate. Philadelphia, Penn., U.S.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. ISBN 0-8058-3062-6.
Citations
- ^ Barnes, Brooks (October 25, 2010). "TV Watchdog Group Is on the Defensive". The New York Times. p. B1. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Abrams, Natalie (May 20, 2010). "Parents Council Protests CBS' $#*! My Dad Says". TV Guide. Archived from the original on May 23, 2010. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Parents Television Council REALLY Loves the Sin". Psychology Today. Retrieved July 13, 2015.
- Bozell, L. Brent III (January 21, 1992). "Why Conservatives Should Be Optimistic About the Media". Heritage Lecture #380. Heritage Foundation. Archived from the original on March 15, 2009. Retrieved August 30, 2009.
- ^ 2005 Annual Report (PDF), Parents Television Council, 2006, p. 14, archived from the original (PDF) on February 26, 2009, retrieved September 4, 2008
- Poniewozik, James (March 20, 2005). "The Decency Police". Time. Vol. 165, no. 13. Archived from the original on March 24, 2005. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- 2005 Annual Report (PDF), Parents Television Council, 2006, p. 13, archived from the original (PDF) on April 28, 2006
- ^ 2005 Annual Report (PDF), Parents Television Council, 2006, p. 15, archived from the original (PDF) on April 28, 2006
- Broder, John M. (February 28, 1997). "Broadcast Industry Defends Its TV Rating System". The New York Times. p. A14. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved February 18, 2017.
- ^ Flint, Joe (October 30, 1998). "On the Air". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on January 9, 2016. Retrieved August 26, 2009.
- Mifflin, Lawrie (October 14, 1998). "A Call for Decency". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Flint, Joe (August 6, 1998). ""Dawson's Creek" is named the filthiest TV series". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Goodman, Tim (November 8, 1999). "Sir, you're blocking my view of the sewer". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "PTC Announces New Name: Parents Television and Media Council".
- Thompson, Bob (December 9, 2004). "Fighting Indecency, One Bleep At a Time". The Washington Post. p. C1. Archived from the original on October 23, 2011. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Tim Winter - President". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on January 5, 2006. Retrieved August 20, 2009.
- "Parents Television Council Appointed to FCC's Consumer Advisory Committee" (Press release). Parents Television Council. July 26, 2007. Retrieved July 30, 2007.
- "Advisory Board". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on January 6, 2006. Retrieved November 27, 2008.
- "Parents Television Council Chapters". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on January 6, 2010. Retrieved August 20, 2009.
- "Steve Allen - National Honorary Chairman-Emeritus". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on September 30, 2007. Retrieved August 5, 2009.
- ^ Christensen, Christian (January 26, 2005). "Pixelate the Morality Police". CommonDreams.org. Archived from the original on January 29, 2005. Retrieved September 12, 2015.
- "Saving the World's Largest Archive of Prime-Time Television". Parents Television Council. Retrieved April 12, 2007.
- "Culture Watch". Parents Television Council. September 28, 2007. Archived from the original on August 7, 2007. Retrieved July 29, 2007.
- Dumenco, Simon (December 12, 2005). "Honey, I Shrank the Cable-TV Universe". Advertising Age. p. 26.
- ^ Gildemeister, Christopher (December 26, 2006). "Culture Watch - Exposing Sex, Violence, and Language in the Media - for the week of 12.26.05 (part 2 of 2)". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on September 30, 2007. Retrieved June 28, 2007.
- "Parenting and the Media: A Column by Rod Gustafson". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on August 7, 2007. Retrieved July 29, 2007.
- "TV Trends". Parents Television Council. March 14, 2008. Archived from the original on March 3, 2008. Retrieved March 14, 2008.
- Catlin, Roger (November 11, 2007). "On TV, being gay is so passé; now transexuals are in". The Seattle Times. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Green 2005, p. 136
- Farhi, Paul (April 19, 2002). "Oh, the Profanity!". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on June 30, 2011. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Kristen Fyfe (March 2, 2006), Wolves in Sheep's Clothing: A Content Analysis of Children's Television (PDF), Parents Television Council, archived (PDF) from the original on August 8, 2007, retrieved August 5, 2007
- McManus, Michael (March 2, 2006). "Group: Children's TV isn't kid stuff". CNN. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved March 15, 2009.
- Huff, Richard (March 4, 2006). "A four-letter word for decency police: Lame". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on November 6, 2010. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
- Lipschultz 2008, pp. 154–157
- Learmonth, Michael (December 14, 2006). "PTC unhappy with TV's religious stereotypes". Variety. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Study: TV shows sex, but not in marriage". Associated Press. August 6, 2008. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- O'Doherty, Ian (August 15, 2008). "Truly, an inspiration to us all". The Irish Independent. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved September 30, 2009.
- Wyatt, Edward (October 29, 2009). "Study: More TV Violence Against Women". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved November 13, 2009.
- "PTC Report Notes "Sharp Rise" in Primetime Broadcast Profanity". Broadcasting & Cable. November 9, 2010. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Carroll, Jerry (December 26, 1995). "A Finger Wagger's Guide to Television". San Francisco Examiner. p. B3. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Family Guide to Prime Time Television". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on June 6, 2011. Retrieved August 16, 2011.
- ^ "Top 10 Best and Worst Shows on Primetime TV 1996-1997". ParentsTV.org. Parents Television Council. 1997. Archived from the original on April 22, 2012. Retrieved June 3, 2007.
- ^ "What Are Your Children Watching?: Research on sex, violence, and profanity on Television". Parents Television Council. 2005. Archived from the original on December 11, 2006. Retrieved October 30, 2007.
- ^ "Top 10 Best and Worst Shows on Primetime Network TV 2001-2002". ParentsTV.org. Parents Television Council. 2002. Archived from the original on June 9, 2007. Retrieved June 28, 2007.
- "Top 10 Best Shows on Primetime Network TV 2002-2003". Parents Television Council. 2003. Archived from the original on June 4, 2012. Retrieved December 16, 2007.
- ^ "PTC's Annual Top 10 Best & Worst Family Shows on Network Television, 1998-99 TV Season". ParentsTV.org. Parents Television Council. 1999. Archived from the original on January 18, 2020. Retrieved June 28, 2007.
- "Top 10 Best and Worst Shows on Primetime Network TV 1999-2000". Parents Television Council. 2000. Archived from the original on December 12, 2006. Retrieved June 28, 2007.
- "Best and Worst Family TV Shows of the Week". Parents Television Council. May 2, 2008. Archived from the original on April 12, 2008. Retrieved May 10, 2008.
- Voss, Brandon (January 25, 2008). "Read Oscar Host Seth MacFarlane's One and Only Gay Interview". The Advocate. Archived from the original on November 10, 2010. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Parents group protests Oscars host Seth MacFarlane". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "So You Think You Can Rate a TV Show?". Parents Television Council. May 2, 2008. Archived from the original on May 9, 2008. Retrieved May 10, 2008.
- "The PTC Seal of Approval". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on August 16, 2009. Retrieved August 5, 2009.
- "The PTC Seal of Approval - Recipients". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on September 7, 2012. Retrieved August 5, 2009.
- Lane 2006, p. 43
- "FCC OKs Bono's F-Word Slip". CBS News. October 7, 2003. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Lane 2006, pp. 44–45
- Lipschultz 2008, pp. 133–134
- "Broadcast Indecency Campaign". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on May 3, 2007.
- ^ Shields, Todd (December 6, 2004). "Activists Dominate Content Complaints". Mediaweek. Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on February 13, 2005. Retrieved June 28, 2007.
- Rice, Lynette (May 11, 2007). "Four TV execs come clean about on-air decency rules". Entertainment Weekly. No. #933. p. 43. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Fisher, Ken (December 7, 2004). "Activist organization responsible for 99% of FCC complaints". arstechnica.com. Ars Technica. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Loviglio, Joann (July 21, 2008). "Appeals court throws out fine against CBS in 'wardrobe malfunction' incident". The Seattle Times. Associated Press. Archived from the original on September 1, 2011. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Content from the March 24, 2004 episode of Fox's That '70s Show". Parents Television Council. March 25, 2004. Archived from the original on September 5, 2012.
- Winter, Tim. "PTC E-Alert (Father of the Pride)". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on June 15, 2009. Retrieved August 5, 2009.
- Halonen, Doug (October 18, 2004). "PTC E-Mails Generate Results". Television Week. Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on December 6, 2007. Retrieved July 18, 2007.
- Eggerton, John (September 24, 2004). "CBS Hit with F-Word Complaint". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Viacom, FCC reach $3.5 million agreement". NBC News. November 24, 2004. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Martin, Kevin; et al., Notices of Apparent Liability and Memorandum Opinion and Order (PDF), FCC 06-17, Federal Communications Commission, archived (PDF) from the original on April 17, 2006, retrieved January 14, 2008
- Winter, Tim. "PTC E-Alert (Life As We Know It)". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on February 18, 2009. Retrieved August 5, 2009.
- ^ Finn, Natalie (March 15, 2006). "CBS Fined for "Trace" of Indecency". E!. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Armas, Genaro C. (January 24, 2005). "FCC denies 36 indecency complaints over "Friends", "The Simpsons" and other shows". Associated Press. Archived from the original on October 6, 2013. Retrieved November 27, 2008.
- Lipschultz 2008, p. 154
- Pierce, Scott D. (September 2, 2006). "Parents Television Council subverts process". Deseret News. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Eggerton, John (October 22, 2007). "CBS Defends Inaction on Without a Trace". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved October 22, 2007.
- Eggerton, John (November 23, 2007). "CBS Pays $300,000 To Settle KUTV License Challenge". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Hibberd, James (December 5, 2007). "Parents Television Council Denounces CBS' 'Dexter' Plan". TV Week. Archived from the original on February 16, 2009. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Cast & Characters - Dexter Morgan/Michael C. Hall". Showtime. Archived from the original on October 2, 2009. Retrieved August 30, 2009.
- Stelter, Brian (February 16, 2008). "Showtime's Serial Killer Moves to CBS, to a Not Entirely Warm Welcome". The New York Times. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved March 6, 2008.
- Eggerton, John (January 25, 2008). "FCC Proposes $1.4M Fine Against ABC Stations for NYPD Blue". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved August 30, 2009. During the season when the episode aired, NYPD Blue was shown on ABC on Tuesdays, 10:00 p.m. (Eastern and Pacific Time Zones) and 9:00 P.M. in the Central and Mountain zones.
- Eggerton, John (January 28, 2008). "PTC Praises FCC's Proposed NYPD Blue Fine". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Teinowitz, Ira (February 21, 2008). "ABC Challenges FCC's 'NYPD Blue' Fine in Court". TV Week. Archived from the original on February 27, 2008. Retrieved March 6, 2008.
- Eggerton, John (July 21, 2008). "CBS' Janet Jackson Fine Thrown Out". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "CBS's 'Big Brother' Drops an F-Bomb on Families" (Press release). PTC. August 6, 2008. Archived from the original on August 11, 2008. Retrieved November 27, 2008.
- "PTC Slams NBC for Airing Yet Another Unbleeped Profanity on the Today Show" (Press release). PTC. September 11, 2008. Retrieved November 27, 2008.
- de Moraes, Lisa (October 2, 2008). "'Survivor' Reveals a Bit Too Much for Watchdog Group". The Washington Post. p. C7. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved September 7, 2017.
- "PTC: CBS Crosses Indecency Line with 'Two and a Half Men'" (Press release). PTC. October 22, 2008.
- Eggerton, John (March 11, 2009). "PTC Outraged Over 'Family Guy' Episode". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the original on March 16, 2010. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Boedeker, Hal (March 11, 2009). "Fox's "Family Guy" has Parents Television Council seeing red; indecency complaint reflects PTC's renewed activism". Orlando Sentinel. Archived from the original on March 15, 2009. Retrieved March 11, 2009.
- Eggerton, John (November 3, 2009). "PTC Pushes Stations To Preempt 'Gossip Girl'". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the original on July 7, 2021. Retrieved November 8, 2009.
- Eggerton, John (November 23, 2009). "PTC Upset Over Adam Lambert AMA Performance". Broadcasting & Cable. Archived from the original on November 26, 2009. Retrieved August 21, 2022.
- "Adam Lambert's AMAs Performance Draws 1,500 Complaints". Rolling Stone. November 24, 2009. Archived from the original on January 9, 2016. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "ABC: Lambert's performance draws 1,500 complaints". Yahoo! Music. Associated Press. November 23, 2009. Archived from the original on June 12, 2012. Retrieved November 23, 2009.
- Johnson, Ted (June 4, 2010). "FCC fines Fox over 'American Dad' episode". Variety. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Fox to FCC: 'American Dad' Inquiry is Unconstitutional". Broadcasting & Cable. July 6, 2010. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Eggerton, John (May 20, 2010). "PTC Takes Aim At '$#*! My Dad Says'". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Britney Spears, Glee Torn a New One By Parents Television Council". The Hollywood Gossip. October 8, 2010.
- Hibberd, James (October 20, 2010). "Sexy 'Glee' Photos Draw 'Pedophilia' Protests". Billboard. Archived from the original on April 5, 2013. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- de Moraes, Lisa (January 21, 2011). "Racy 'Skins' prompts Parents Television Council to call for investigation". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved January 25, 2011.
- "Parents vs. 'Skins'". Los Angeles Times. January 22, 2011. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- McNary, Dave (August 20, 2020). "Netflix Apologizes for 'Inappropriate' 'Cuties' Poster Slammed for 'Sexualizing' Little Girls". Variety. Archived from the original on August 20, 2020. Retrieved August 20, 2020.
- James, Meg (May 24, 2005). "Critics are saying 'That's Too Hot' of sexy Carl's Jr. ad". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "TV Ads: Advertiser and Network Campaign". Parents Television Council. 2005. Archived from the original on June 20, 2009. Retrieved August 25, 2009.
- Silver, Caleb (June 1, 2005). "No apologies for sexy Paris Hilton ad". CNN. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved June 28, 2007.
- Wolf, Alan M. (July 23, 2009). "Hardee's ads too racy for N.C. consumers". Raleigh News & Observer. McClatchy News Service. Retrieved June 7, 2010.
- Roberts, Christine (July 23, 2009). "Hardee's ad rejected for asking reviewers to choose between "A-holes" and "B-holes"". New York Daily News. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Gordon, Devin (December 13, 1999). "WWF Tones Down Its 'Smackdown' Act". Newsweek. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "PTC Calls MCI Worldcom to the Mat - archived on 31 October 2001". Internet Archive Wayback Machine. Parents Television Council. June 1, 2000. Archived from the original on November 6, 2001.
- Dempsey, John (May 28, 2001). "WWF wins round 1 against parents org". Variety. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- ^ "News Shorts - WWF wins Round 1 against parents group". Media Life Magazine. May 28, 2001. Archived from the original on October 25, 2006. Retrieved June 16, 2009.
- ^ "Judge rejects Parents Television Council motion to Dismiss Lawsuit" (Press release). World Wrestling Entertainment. May 24, 2001. Archived from the original on June 9, 2009.
- "Suit Filed Against L. Brent Bozell III, Media Research Center" (Press release). World Wrestling Entertainment. November 9, 2000. Archived from the original on August 14, 2007. Retrieved August 8, 2007.
- "WWF Sues Media Watchdog Group". Los Angeles Times. November 10, 2000. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "World Wrestling Entertainment Settles Lawsuit With Parents Television Council; Founder Brent Bozell Issues Apology" (Press release). World Wrestling Entertainment. July 8, 2002. Archived from the original on June 9, 2009. Retrieved June 16, 2009.
- "World Wrestling Entertainment Settles Lawsuit With Parents Television Council; PTC Founder Brent Bozell Issues Apology" (Press release). Parents Television Council. July 8, 2002. Retrieved June 16, 2009.
- "Steven Richards discusses the politics of Right To Censor". Slam Wrestling. November 7, 2000. Retrieved October 30, 2021.
- Fritz, Brian; Murray, Christopher (2006). Between the Ropes: Wrestling's Greatest Triumphs and Failures. ECW Press. p. 167. ISBN 978-1-55022-726-0.
- Sammond, Nicholas (2005). Steel Chair to the Head. Duke University Press. p. 148. ISBN 978-0-8223-3438-5.
- Eggerton, John (September 28, 2007). "PTC Seeks In-Flight-Video Guidelines". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Hall, Sarah (December 22, 2006). "PTC Puts NBC on Naughty List". E! Online. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Lipschultz 2008, p. 178
- Lasar, Matthew (December 21, 2008). "Decency group goes after YouTube users' comments". Ars Technica. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved August 5, 2009.
- Oliver, Kelley (October 20, 2015). "New PTC Research Finds ABC's The Muppets Exposes Kids to Adult-Themed Content Every 3 Minutes". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on November 17, 2015. Retrieved October 25, 2015.
- Falzone, Diana (January 29, 2015). "Parents group slams 'Sex Box' basic cable show". Fox News.
- "What is the PTC's mission?". FAQ. Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on July 3, 2007. Retrieved June 12, 2007.
- ^ "About Us". Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on January 17, 2008. Retrieved December 31, 2007.
- Battaglio, Stephen (September 25, 2003). ""CSI" Goes for Less Seamy Side". New York Daily News. Archived from the original on February 20, 2009. Retrieved March 15, 2008.
- ^ "TV Watch Statement on Government's Role in Controlling What's on TV" (Press release). Television Watch. June 15, 2006. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved June 19, 2007.
- Nelson, Colleen McCain (August 20, 2005). "Networks prepare to take on parents in showdown over TV programming". The Seattle Times. Archived from the original on June 22, 2011. Originally published by The Dallas Morning News as "Networks rebelling against Mom, Dad."
- Campbell, Julia (August 10, 2000). "Lieberman in Hollywood: Will He Be Welcome?". ABC News. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved August 27, 2007.
- Smith, Lynn (May 10, 2004). "For 'indecency' watchdogs, work is a day full of TV". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Blumner, Robyn (June 10, 2007). "The nanny inside your TV". Tampa Bay Times. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Price 1998, p. 143
- Berkowitz, Bill (May 11, 2005). "The Parents Television Council". Media Transparency. Archived from the original on April 27, 2006. Retrieved March 15, 2009.
- Ogg, Erica (July 27, 2006). "Parents group derides V-Chip ads". CNET News. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Parents Want Control of TV" (Press release). TV Watch. March 15, 2007. Archived from the original on September 27, 2007. Retrieved April 22, 2007.
- Winter, Tim. "Cable Choice is the Right Choice". ParentsTV.org. Parents Television Council. Archived from the original on May 2, 2007. Retrieved June 28, 2007.
- Eggerton, John (February 1, 2005). "PTC Doesn't Want Its MTV". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Cable Consumer Choice Campaign". PTC. Archived from the original on January 6, 2009. Retrieved February 22, 2009.
- "PTC Awards Disney for Family-Friendly Advertising Practices" (Press release). Parents Television Council. March 8, 2007. Retrieved April 12, 2007.
- "Review - Naomi's New Morning". ParentsTV.org. Parents Television Council. May 4, 2007. Archived from the original on February 3, 2007. Retrieved August 24, 2009.
- "PTC Shows Consumers How Cable Should Be" (Press release). Parents Television Council. September 25, 2007. Retrieved October 12, 2007.
- Strecker, Erin. "Parents Television Council isn't happy with Miley Cyrus' VMAs performance". Entertainment Weekly. Archived from the original on December 30, 2020. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Moss, Linda; Umstead, R. Thomas (April 10, 2008). "PTC Puts a Bad 'Rap' On BET, MTV". Multichannel. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Crupi, Anthony (April 10, 2008). "PTC Blasts MTV, BET". Mediaweek. Archived from the original on April 22, 2008. Retrieved January 2, 2011.
- Eggerton, John (January 21, 2009). "PTC Cautions Media About Britney Spears Song". Broadcasting & Cable. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- "Rihanna thanks US pressure groups for making 'Man Down' a success". NME. June 11, 2011. Retrieved April 18, 2022.
- Parents Want Control of TV. TV Watch. March 15, 2007. Retrieved April 22, 2007.
- Voss, Brandon (2008). "Big Gay Following: Seth MacFarlane". The Advocate.
- "Kurt Sutter's content: Dear Mr. Bozell, Yes, I oft…" on WhoSay". www.whosay.com. Archived from the original on January 29, 2015.
- Dumenco, Simon (December 12, 2005). "Honey, I Shrank the Cable-TV Universe". Ad Age.
Categories:
- Political advocacy groups in the United States
- Conservative organizations in the United States
- Organizations established in 1995
- Internet properties established in 1998
- Censorship of broadcasting in the United States
- Censorship in Christianity
- Entertainment rating organizations
- Non-profit organizations based in Alexandria, Virginia
- Non-profit organizations based in California
- Television organizations in the United States
- Catholic organizations established in the 20th century
- Christianity and politics
- Political organizations based in the United States
- Television content ratings systems
- Catholic Church in the United States
- Censorship in the United States
- First Amendment to the United States Constitution
- Christianity and society in the United States
- 1995 establishments in the United States