Revision as of 22:40, 5 December 2023 editSimpul skitsofreeneea (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,179 editsm →page move← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:27, 28 December 2024 edit undoCewbot (talk | contribs)Bots7,670,402 editsm Maintain {{WPBS}}: 4 WikiProject templates. (Fix Category:Pages using WikiProject banner shell with invalid parameters)Tag: Talk banner shell conversion | ||
(18 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Talk header}} | {{Talk header}} | ||
{{WikiProject banner shell| |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1= | ||
{{WikiProject Medicine|importance=High|hemonc=y}} | |||
{{WikiProject Health and fitness |
{{WikiProject Health and fitness |importance=high}} | ||
{{WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health |
{{WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health|importance=mid}} | ||
{{WikiProject Environment |
{{WikiProject Environment|importance=mid}} | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{off topic warning}} | {{off topic warning}} | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
|archive = Talk:Passive smoking/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = Talk:Passive smoking/Archive %(counter)d | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Broken anchors|links= | |||
* <nowiki>]</nowiki> The anchor (#Corporate denialism) has been ] before. <!-- {"title":"Corporate denialism","appear":{"revid":366208770,"parentid":366184331,"timestamp":"2010-06-05T15:45:12Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"disappear":{"revid":659827291,"parentid":659381650,"timestamp":"2015-04-29T07:32:16Z","removed_section_titles":,"added_section_titles":},"very_different":false,"rename_to":"Climate change denialism"} --> | |||
}} | |||
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== | ==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment== | ||
] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2018-08-20">20 August 2018</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2018-12-05">5 December 2018</span>. Further details are available ]. Student editor(s): ]. | ] This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2018-08-20">20 August 2018</span> and <span class="mw-formatted-date" title="2018-12-05">5 December 2018</span>. Further details are available ]. Student editor(s): ]. | ||
{{small|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 06:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}} | {{small|Above undated message substituted from ] by ] (]) 06:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)}} | ||
⚫ | == Semi-protected edit request on |
||
⚫ | {{edit semi-protected|Passive smoking|answered=yes}} | ||
In the intro of the section 'effects' please add that "There is no risk-free level of secondhand smoke exposure. Even brief exposure can be harmful to health." This is supported by citation no. 133 from the CDC fact sheet Also additional sources are from: | |||
1) US surgeon general: | |||
2) The EPA: | |||
3) American Lung Association: | |||
4) American cancer society: | |||
5) Australian government Department of health: | |||
6) National Cancer Institute: | |||
Also in the same section's sub-section 'Cancer: General' , please add "Secondhand smoke contains more than 7,000 chemicals, of which hundreds are toxic and about 70 can cause cancer." | |||
source: citation no.133 from CDC: and from the American cancer society: | |||
Thank you! ] (]) 18:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC) | |||
: Second part is done. I don't know if we really ''need'' the first sentence; it's not like the article implies otherwise. Leaving request open for another opinion. ] <small>(])</small> 20:47, 5 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
::I find the first sentence about no risk-free level to be helpful information for readers. It looks supported by the sources. I'd probably support adding it. ––] <span style="border-radius:8em;padding:2px 5px;background:#0151D2;font-size:75%">]</span> 03:29, 6 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
:: I can see benefits from both. On one hand the article's 3rd sentence screams that it's dangerous and so adding it may be superfluous. On the other, it can be imperative to clarify that the health detriment of the smoke isn't either "nothing" or "horrible disease". I would lean more so on adding it. If we can reasonably get away with further hammering home that smoking is bad, I think we should take it, and the requested addition is extremely inobtrusive from my point of view. ](]) 23:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
:] '''Note:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> I'm closing this request while it's under discussion per {{tq|Remember to change the answered no parameter to "yes" when the request has been accepted, rejected ''or on hold awaiting user input''. This is so that inactive or completed requests don't needlessly fill up the edit requests category.}} ] (]) 11:06, 10 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Scene in ] == | |||
Scene: Lonnie Shaver's fellow jurors request him not to '''secondhand smoke'''. Please create "Pop culture" section and mention this. ] (]) 05:48, 5 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
: {{not done}}. ], not important to the subject. ] <small>(])</small> 20:43, 5 August 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Merger proposal == | == Merger proposal == | ||
Line 63: | Line 34: | ||
:The term "secondhand smoke" refers to the smoke itself, while the term "passive smoking" refers to being subjected to the smoke. Hope that explains things. Anyway, that is no reason to move the article away from the ]. ] (]) 19:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC) | :The term "secondhand smoke" refers to the smoke itself, while the term "passive smoking" refers to being subjected to the smoke. Hope that explains things. Anyway, that is no reason to move the article away from the ]. ] (]) 19:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
:Second hand smoke is also common: as I indicated "smoking" is the action part of the subject - which is a generalized concept: smoking smoker (1) but means to ignite tobacco to make smoke to inhale for drug-use (2). So 1 is taken to mean 2. This I think is obvious and without contention. "Passive smoking" isn't therefore a fusion of two ideas successfully but is a confusion of the idea of (1) as I have shown, that by the fact of passive, no action smoking is occuring. Wouldn't you agree? whether or not "passive smoking" is the commonest version, which I'm not stating it isn't (although I don't see you've provided any indication of proof currently to support your claim). ] (]) 22:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC) | :Second hand smoke is also common: as I indicated "smoking" is the action part of the subject - which is a generalized concept: smoking smoker (1) but means to ignite tobacco to make smoke to inhale for drug-use (2). So 1 is taken to mean 2. This I think is obvious and without contention. "Passive smoking" isn't therefore a fusion of two ideas successfully but is a confusion of the idea of (1) as I have shown, that by the fact of passive, no action smoking is occuring. Wouldn't you agree? whether or not "passive smoking" is the commonest version, which I'm not stating it isn't (although I don't see you've provided any indication of proof currently to support your claim). ] (]) 22:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
:The participation in the habit |
:The participation in the habit-activity of the consumption of tobacco for it's psychoactive effects is by the application of sufficient heat to cause a state of ignition where-by smoke is created = smoking. ] (]) 22:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC) | ||
:I can not understand what it is you are trying to say or what your argument is. But i guess that it is based on an ]; since "to smoke" is an active action where someone lights tobacco and inhales the smoke that means that any phrase that contains the verb "smoke" must use "smoke" in exactly that meaning. That is incorrect, and language does not work that way. ] (]) 05:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:An administrator reverted my response for legitimate reasons (as is shown in policy): ] ] (]) 02:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
:With regards to 19:21 "no continuity": this makes the introductory concept not the subject of the article - therefore a way to improve would be to impose "passive smoking" as the continuation instead of "second hand smoking" - the intro different to the contents term is conflictual for the reader. Evidently "As of 2003, "secondhand smoke" was the term most used to refer to other people's smoke in the English-language media." if true does indicate by your argument ] the article needs to be renamed. Although the relevant editor distorted the source so I deleted. ] (]) 02:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 6#Passive inhaling of tobacco smoke}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 10:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
⚫ | == Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2024 == | ||
⚫ | {{edit semi-protected|Passive smoking|answered=yes}} | ||
Please add the missing <code><nowiki><ref></nowiki></code> tag here: | |||
<code><nowiki>The ] has identified reduction of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke as key element for actions to encourage healthy child development.{{cite web|access-date=2024-06-12|title=WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC)|url=https://www.who.int/europe/teams/tobacco/who-framework-convention-on-tobacco-control-(who-fctc)|website=www.who.int}}</ref></nowiki></code> | |||
. ] (]) 05:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> ] (]) 17:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 21:27, 28 December 2024
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Passive smoking article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 35 days |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Passive smoking. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Passive smoking at the Reference desk. |
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 20 August 2018 and 5 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Atomic1City*Blonde.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:11, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Merger proposal
I propose to merge Sidestream smoke into this article because everything that needs to be covered about sidestream smoke is also covered in this article. Needforspeed888 (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)
This merge seems reasonable to me. AdequateNBAfan (talk) 01:49, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
- I'd agree, except that Passive smoking, at 137k, is WP:TOOBIG and so having a separate article is warranted. Klbrain (talk) 16:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)
- Closing, given the uncontested objection with stale discussion. Klbrain (talk) 10:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)
Title change proposal
With an increase in literature on third-hand smoke, the dichotomy between active and passive smoking seems less relevant. As such, I'd propose changing the beginning term to secondhand or second-hand smoke, which would move to passive smoking to one of the alternate terms. AdequateNBAfan (talk) 01:51, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
page move
@Sjö: the article introduces "passive smoking" but continues "secondhand smoking" c.f. Effects - there is no continuity Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 19:21, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- The term "secondhand smoke" refers to the smoke itself, while the term "passive smoking" refers to being subjected to the smoke. Hope that explains things. Anyway, that is no reason to move the article away from the WP:COMMONNAME. Sjö (talk) 19:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- Second hand smoke is also common: as I indicated "smoking" is the action part of the subject - which is a generalized concept: smoking smoker (1) but means to ignite tobacco to make smoke to inhale for drug-use (2). So 1 is taken to mean 2. This I think is obvious and without contention. "Passive smoking" isn't therefore a fusion of two ideas successfully but is a confusion of the idea of (1) as I have shown, that by the fact of passive, no action smoking is occuring. Wouldn't you agree? whether or not "passive smoking" is the commonest version, which I'm not stating it isn't (although I don't see you've provided any indication of proof currently to support your claim). Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 22:37, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- The participation in the habit-activity of the consumption of tobacco for it's psychoactive effects is by the application of sufficient heat to cause a state of ignition where-by smoke is created = smoking. Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 22:39, 5 December 2023 (UTC)
- I can not understand what it is you are trying to say or what your argument is. But i guess that it is based on an etymological fallacy; since "to smoke" is an active action where someone lights tobacco and inhales the smoke that means that any phrase that contains the verb "smoke" must use "smoke" in exactly that meaning. That is incorrect, and language does not work that way. Sjö (talk) 05:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
- An administrator reverted my response for legitimate reasons (as is shown in policy): User talk:Simpul skitsofreeneea#December 2023 Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 02:05, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
- With regards to 19:21 "no continuity": this makes the introductory concept not the subject of the article - therefore a way to improve would be to impose "passive smoking" as the continuation instead of "second hand smoking" - the intro different to the contents term is conflictual for the reader. Evidently "As of 2003, "secondhand smoke" was the term most used to refer to other people's smoke in the English-language media." if true does indicate by your argument WP:UCRN the article needs to be renamed. Although the relevant editor distorted the source so I deleted. Simpul skitsofreeneea (talk) 02:20, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
"Passive inhaling of tobacco smoke" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Passive inhaling of tobacco smoke has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 December 6 § Passive inhaling of tobacco smoke until a consensus is reached. Sjö (talk) 10:07, 6 December 2023 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 15 July 2024
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please add the missing <ref>
tag here:
The ] has identified reduction of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke as key element for actions to encourage healthy child development.{{cite web|access-date=2024-06-12|title=WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC)|url=https://www.who.int/europe/teams/tobacco/who-framework-convention-on-tobacco-control-(who-fctc)|website=www.who.int}}</ref>
. 76.14.122.5 (talk) 05:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Done PianoDan (talk) 17:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Categories:- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class vital articles in Biology and health sciences
- B-Class medicine articles
- High-importance medicine articles
- B-Class hematology-oncology articles
- Unknown-importance hematology-oncology articles
- Hematology-oncology task force articles
- All WikiProject Medicine pages
- B-Class Health and fitness articles
- High-importance Health and fitness articles
- WikiProject Health and fitness articles
- B-Class Occupational Safety and Health articles
- Mid-importance Occupational Safety and Health articles
- WikiProject Occupational Safety and Health articles
- B-Class Environment articles
- Mid-importance Environment articles