| Revision as of 19:06, 5 September 2024 editEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,226 edits OneClickArchived "Semi-protection of Khalil al-Hayya" to User talk:EdJohnston/Archive 53← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:08, 29 December 2024 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,226 edits OneClickArchived "Is this an adequate source?" to User talk:EdJohnston/Archive 53 | ||
| (83 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| {{archives|search=yes|auto=yes}} | {{archives|search=yes|auto=yes}} | ||
| == Update regarding Topic-Ban Observance == | |||
| == SPI case(s) == | |||
| I once again momentarily forgot about my lede image ban and reverted a change to a picture I had uploaded as the lede image for ]. It literally occurred to me at the last moment before making said revert that what I was about to do might violate my topic ban. However, by the time it fully registered, the change had already been made. I have since reverted said change. While I am inclined to ask you to show leniency, I realize I asked you to dismiss a similar occurence around a month ago so I will leave it to your discretion regarding whether further sanctions are warranted. ] (]) 03:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hello Ed; hope you are doing well. | |||
| The userpage of ], who was identified as a sockpuppet in ], remains to be tagged per ]. A clerk will probably notice it before the case is archived, but I thought of letting you know. | |||
| I would also like to ask whether the rest of the accounts mentioned in the comment section of the aforementioned case – ] and ] – were checked for "possible" links? They are reported in a different case (see ]), but the evidence in relation to ], is compelling. There is some additional suspicious activity that wasn't mentioned; such as Lumbarschen appearing a day after the creation of ] by Henrikurti, to contest its deletion (]). Though, this is not necessarily due to sockpuppetry; there are additional possibilities to consider. ] (]) 14:54, 1 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == HerbLightman alias == | |||
| *{{userlinks|HerbLightman}} | |||
| *{{userlinks|49Bottles}} | |||
| Hi Ed, | |||
| Sorry to bug you. I recently cleaned out a filmography of ]. I feel like an editor with similar editing patterns of ] has come in and made changes to more European genre filmography articles through the ] account. Not sure if it needs more time or eyes, but figured I'd point it out. Thanks. ] (]) 18:55, 1 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Whups looks like we both did this around the same time . Hope it does not complicate things. ] (]) 22:22, 2 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| *{{userlinks|Symphony_Regalia}} | |||
| User was from the Japanese wiki for without consulting the Talk page first (this disruptive cross wiki activity started roughly a month after their initial edits on the ), ], harassing JP editors who were against their behaviour with , as well as maliciously ] ] of said editors (which coincidentally happened during the edit block request). | |||
| This user was under the scrutiny of an ] and an ], both of which were ignored by said user, except for the socks. User was continuing their edits on the English pages during the duration of both incidences. This user engages in aggressive POV-pushing and does not engage in Talks nor do they present information when pressed, as noted ], and ]. I would like to know what measures could be taken against this user. ] (]) 23:40, 2 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :This IP user is an involved editor spreading false allegations. A CheckUser ] and the sock puppet allegations were not substantiated. | |||
| :I was blocked based on a comment request where ] gave input, but I believe that to be for reasons of offending Japanese sensibilities. On Japanese Misplaced Pages I have had a target on my back for a while for attempting to bring the Nanking Massacre article in line with the English counterpart (on Japanese Misplaced Pages the ] is named "''The Nanking Incident''" and many of the genocide allegations are scrubbed from the article). | |||
| :None of this is relevant as I haven't edited on Japanese Misplaced Pages in a while. ] (]) 00:27, 3 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::The ] by a JP admin mentions "an abnormal amount of logins within a short timeframe" for those accounts, which was the ] by another JP admin. It should be noted that the socks were created days later after your initial edit on the subject, all of which were involved in the same subject matter. | |||
| ::You were requested for comments on both the RfC and the edit block request to defend yourself, would you kindly explain why you chose not to do so? ] (]) 01:53, 3 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Sock complaint about Sevens Football == | |||
| *{{pagelinks|Sevens Football}} | |||
| *{{pagelinks|Sevens Football Association}} | |||
| *{{pagelinks|Seven-a-side football}} | |||
| One more sock-attacked page "sevens football" needs deletion, see my log ] (]) 16:21, 3 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :You are insisting that ] should be a redirect to ] and not be its own article. Has this been discussed anywhere? I notice that some of the past editors of ] are now blocked but I'm not well-informed about any sock issues that may exist. You could link to any SPI reports. ] (]) 17:29, 3 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::I put three months of semiprotection on ]. ] (]) 00:24, 4 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Conundrum == | |||
| Hey Ed, hope you are doing well. I have a conundrum. | |||
| I have been unable to find this journal article: | |||
| *Jeannin, Jean-Paul. "Jean de Luxembourg, seigneur de Haubourdin, dit le Bâtard de Saint-Pol." Revue Historique, vol. 147, 1923, pp. 145-175.<br> | |||
| I checked Jstor more ways than I care to relate and found nothing. | |||
| I have also been unable to find any mention of Jean, Lord of Haubourdin, Bastard of Luxembourg / Bastard of Saint-Pol, or Hennequin in this book: | |||
| *Allmand, Christopher. The Hundred Years War: England and France at War c.1300–1450. Cambridge University Press, 1988, no page number given<br> | |||
| It is searchable/viewable via | |||
| AND, I have been unable to verify the existance of this book: | |||
| *Browning, Reed. The Duke of Burgundy: Philip the Good. G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1978, no page number given<br> | |||
| World Cat has no record of it<br> | |||
| Isbn search brings back weird stuff or books by Richard Vaughan and William R. Tyler<br> | |||
| Would you, or anyone reading this, be willing to do a search for this information? --] (]) 02:21, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hello KB. We have an article at ]. Why not explain on the article's talk page what you're looking for? I looked at Revue Historique, and their contents seem to be available through JSTOR, including 1923. Is your concern that there is no article in the Revue matching the reference? If Jean fought in the Hundred Years War there ought to be coverage. There is an actual historian named ] but I couldn't find a book by him about the Duke of Burgundy ] (]) 17:58, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :: were added by ] within the last few days. You could ask them. ] (]) 18:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:08, 29 December 2024
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Update regarding Topic-Ban Observance
I once again momentarily forgot about my lede image ban and reverted a change to a picture I had uploaded as the lede image for Hideki Tojo. It literally occurred to me at the last moment before making said revert that what I was about to do might violate my topic ban. However, by the time it fully registered, the change had already been made. I have since reverted said change. While I am inclined to ask you to show leniency, I realize I asked you to dismiss a similar occurence around a month ago so I will leave it to your discretion regarding whether further sanctions are warranted. Emiya1980 (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)