| Revision as of 05:18, 6 November 2024 edit31.164.184.21 (talk) →Edit-warring IP at Fort Mose: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:08, 29 December 2024 edit undoEdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,226 edits OneClickArchived "Is this an adequate source?" to User talk:EdJohnston/Archive 53 | ||
| (44 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| {{archives|search=yes|auto=yes}} | {{archives|search=yes|auto=yes}} | ||
| == |
== Update regarding Topic-Ban Observance == | ||
| *{{userlinks|Emiya1980}} | |||
| *{{pagelinks|Leonid Brezhnev}} | |||
| *{{pagelinks|Loomis Havemeyer}} | |||
| I once again momentarily forgot about my lede image ban and reverted a change to a picture I had uploaded as the lede image for ]. It literally occurred to me at the last moment before making said revert that what I was about to do might violate my topic ban. However, by the time it fully registered, the change had already been made. I have since reverted said change. While I am inclined to ask you to show leniency, I realize I asked you to dismiss a similar occurence around a month ago so I will leave it to your discretion regarding whether further sanctions are warranted. ] (]) 03:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| This message comes to inform you that I slipped up with regards to the topic ban. During the course of visiting the ] page, I noticed there was no date for the lede image and then (as a matter of habit) edited the infobox to reflect that the photo depicted Tikhonov in 1985. Almost immediately afterward, it occurred to me that such an edit was in violation of the topic ban and I promptly reverted said edit. You'll find that the timestamp of such edits reflects this. | |||
| Everything I have just said to you is 100% true and is not intended to justify a calculated attempt to bypass the topic ban that was recently opposed. | |||
| If possible, please cut me a break regarding this mistake on my part in this one instance. ] (]) 02:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| *{{tps}} The problems with this user are certainly broader compared to this lenient sanction. One needs to simply take a look at ] article for understanding that. ] (]) 03:35, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::], thanks for your note. I won't be taking any action on your slip-up myself. ] (]) 03:48, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::: is also really pushing at the edge of the topic ban, since in an article with an infobox, the addition of an image is going to ''be'' to that infobox. ] (]) 18:59, 13 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Does in ] violate my topic ban?] (]) 02:43, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| ::No, you should be able to contribute at ] so long as you stay away from mentioning the infobox. I notice that you just self-reverted your change to the first sentence of the article. That seems wise. Not because of your topic ban but because such a change would be a magnet for edit wars. ] (]) 03:07, 24 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Seven}} | |||
| --] (]) 06:14, 17 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| ] | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
| == Query about outcome of edit warring report == | |||
| * | |||
| *{{pagelinks|Melissa McBride}} | |||
| *{{userlinks|Zombie girl509}} | |||
| *{{userlinks|Asdfghjkl38}} | |||
| Hello, Thank you for looking into the report I made about user 'Zombie girl509' reverting an edit made to Melissa McBride's Misplaced Pages page. | |||
| Please can I ask why I am receiving a warning? I cited reliable sources to prove that the information I edited is accurate, and I provided explanations for this edit. Zombie girl509 has been reverting this with no explanation as to why, even after I reached out to communicate about it. I have been trying to provide accurate information while it seems to me that Zombie girl509 has been reverting this with malicious intent. I reached out on Zombie girl509's 'Talk' page and I posted on the article talk page about the edit, but I received no response. If there's something else I should have done, please let me know. ] (]) 16:40, 29 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :It appears you have reverted about four times since October 12. If my count is correct then your behavior can be described as long-term edit warring. So it is not just the other party who is at fault. You did the right thing by opening a talk page discussion. Usually, when there is a complaint of edit warring the admins only look at who is continuing to revert, unless the thing being reverted is blatant vandalism or misinformation. So being right is not a defence here. Let's see what ] does next. Be careful about phrases like 'malicious intent' since they don't seem to be trying to make the article worse. They could be sincere in thinking their version is better. ] (]) 17:12, 29 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thank you for your response. I appreciate and understand your explanation. | |||
| ::Thank you for your advice about the phrase 'malicious intent'. My concern stems from cultural context, which is external discourse surrounding Melissa McBride's role in The Walking Dead: Daryl Dixon, which is the subject of this edit. The context is that despite the fact that her part is widely described as 'Lead role' and that she is an Executive Producer, a minority of social media users have been known to express hateful discourse about her and the character she plays in this programme. This includes attempts to downplay her role. These specific edit reversions seem, to me, to align with the behaviour that is seen on other platforms. I do believe that removing 'Executive Producer' and changing 'Lead role' to 'Main cast' is misinformation, especially as I have cited sources that prove the information in my edit to be accurate. But I appreciate that this may be a coincidence and that this specific user may be sincere. ] (]) 17:59, 29 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::] has been blocked 48 hours for continuing the war after being warned at AN3 to wait for consensus. ] (]) 03:37, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Hello, I'm writing to ask for guidance on how to proceed as the other user has reverted this edit again and has not responded to any of my attempts at communication. Following their reversion, the information now on the page has removed and changed the correct information, which is proved by the two sources that are cited. Since the other user is not engaging in discussion to reach consensus and is continuing to revert the edit, despite the information I added being proved by the cited sources, please can you advise how to proceed? Thank you very much for your help. ] (]) 04:27, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::You could ask at a film-related Wikiproject. ] (]) 05:11, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Edit-warring IP at ] == | |||
| *{{pagelinks|Fort Mose}} | |||
| Hi Ed, hope you're doing well. We're at the Fort Mose article who insists on making unsourced changes to sourced content and adding misspelled proper names. ] (]) 18:21, 5 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :I semiprotected ] one month due to the unsourced IP changes and the edit warring. ] (]) 03:57, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks, Ed. I think he'll come around to respecting other editors. He's no dummy.;-) ] (]) 04:05, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Dear Carlstalk, | |||
| :::This is completely unfair. My edits were very legit. Why did you erase all I did? And your words "Learn English" are very inappropriate. What kind of Misplaced Pages user you think you are by erasing others contributions and writing them what you wrote? Please reconsider. ] (]) 05:18, 6 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 16:08, 29 December 2024
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Update regarding Topic-Ban Observance
I once again momentarily forgot about my lede image ban and reverted a change to a picture I had uploaded as the lede image for Hideki Tojo. It literally occurred to me at the last moment before making said revert that what I was about to do might violate my topic ban. However, by the time it fully registered, the change had already been made. I have since reverted said change. While I am inclined to ask you to show leniency, I realize I asked you to dismiss a similar occurence around a month ago so I will leave it to your discretion regarding whether further sanctions are warranted. Emiya1980 (talk) 03:42, 19 December 2024 (UTC)