| Revision as of 16:52, 5 February 2020 editQuackGuru (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users79,978 edits →Ownership← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 17:07, 30 December 2024 edit undoJonesey95 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Mass message senders, Template editors373,946 editsm Fix Linter errors. | ||
| (44 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | {{User:MiszaBot/config | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 100K | |maxarchivesize = 100K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 6 | ||
| |algo = old(5d) | |algo = old(5d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:QuackGuru/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:QuackGuru/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| http://www.tobacco.org/ | http://www.tobacco.org/ | ||
| ==] of ]== | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| ] | |||
| ⚫ | <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article |
||
| {{Quote box|quote=<p>If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read ].</p><p>You may want to consider using the ] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}} | |||
| The page ] has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done under ], because the page appeared to be an unambiguous ]. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://medium.com/@seozenius/ayurveda-the-ancient-indian-system-of-medicine-is-based-on-the-principle-of-maintaining-a-balance-d37f47436f0d. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''sentences''. This part is crucial: ''say it in your own words''. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be ]'''. | |||
| If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you ''must'' verify that externally by one of the processes explained at ]. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see ] for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at ] for more details, or ask a question ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with ]. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Draft%3AAyurveda|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at ]. <!-- Template:Db-copyvio-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> ] (]) 11:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. |
||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| == Signature color and user page redirect == | |||
| ⚫ | <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ], to which you have , is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or if it should be ]. | ||
| ⚫ | The discussion will take place at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | ||
| I didn't want to clutter up the article talk page where I first suggested redirecting your user page to your talk page. | |||
| To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit ]. Delivered by '']'' (]) 01:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)<!-- User:SDZeroBot/AfD notifier/template --> | |||
| I just realized that you ''want'' your user name to be red in signatures. I hadn't bothered to analyze the wikitext until now: | |||
| :<nowiki>] (])</nowiki> | |||
| :] (]) | |||
| == <s>Copyvio on Health effects of electronic cigarettes</s> == | |||
| And I learned a trick for combining bolding and color styling: '''<nowiki><b style="color: #e34234;">Text</b></nowiki>''' | |||
| :<b style="color: #e34234;">Text</b> | |||
| <s>] Your edit to ] has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added ] material to Misplaced Pages without evidence of ] from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read ] for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Misplaced Pages strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''content'', such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy '''will be ]'''. See ] for more information. <!-- Template:uw-copyright -->⸺] 03:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)</s> | |||
| I will be using that. It is more compact than using span. | |||
| Withdrawn.⸺] 07:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==<s>CCI Notice</s>== | |||
| You can make it easier for people if you redirect your user page to your talk page. It won't effect the color of your username in signatures since you are using inline styling. | |||
| <s>Hello, QuackGuru. This message is being sent to inform you that a '''request for a contributor copyright investigation''' has been filed at ] concerning your contributions to Misplaced Pages in relation to ]. The listing can be found ]. Thank you. <!--Template:CCI-notice--> ⸺] 04:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)</s> | |||
| You know, you could make your signature username a color like orange. That would be a bright color, but it wouldn't confuse people by being a red link. | |||
| :{{ping|Randomstaplers}} QuackGuru always followed sources very closely to minimize misinterpretation of what the source said but, as I remember, the wording was substantially rearranged and not a copyvio problem. I know copyright checking is painful and I don't want to add to the stress but would it be possible to give, say, two examples of text added to Misplaced Pages and the corresponding originals? I had a quick look at ] but found it hard to identify a problem. Perhaps you could add an example at ]. Thanks. ] (]) 05:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :<nowiki>]</nowiki> | |||
| <s>::* @]: Go to https://copyvios.toolforge.org/ and paste in the URLs from the CCI. This is pretty bad.⸺] 05:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)</s> | |||
| :] | |||
| Withdrawn. So far only one copyvio. Sorry for the trouble. I'll leave this up in case anyone else is confused. ⸺] 07:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| -- ] (]) 18:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :@] Withdrawn the CCI, only one actual copyvio so far: this , with this . ⸺] 07:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == List of brands on ] == | |||
| ::@] I've gone ahead and addressed it. Hoping that's all of them.⸺] 08:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks for your work! ] (]) 09:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| You my edit on ] in which I deleted the content about the various brands of this product, with the edit summary ''Including brands are part of the article. See ]. (If it is an invitation for spam then request semi-protection.'' I would argue that the inclusion of the individual products in that article is no more appropriate than the inclusion in ]. Since ], including an exhaustive brand listing within the body of the article seems inappropriate. At very best, one might consider creating ], but since the product category is relatively new, it's unlikely any of the brands has yet reached sufficient notability to have its own article, and since most lists should consist only of category entries that already have a Misplaced Pages article (see ]), you'd be hard-pressed to create a valid list article. In any case, since you've reverted my edit, I'll open a discussion about the matter at ]. Please feel free to comment there. ]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 19:28, 30 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 05:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Violation of RfC == | |||
| Re: where your edit summary was simply ''Violation of RfC''. Care to explain? ]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 19:57, 30 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :I started numerous RfCs last year. Read archive 10 under brands. ] (]) 20:05, 30 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :: I would argue that the RfC was inconclusive at best. You posted a rather long screed on the topic, and one editor basically said "yeah, what he said." While a discussion of the various technologies available (with, perhaps, a mention of which brands employ those technologies) would be useful, a brand-by-brand exposition smacks of promotion. ]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 12:52, 31 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::Content about different brands and how they work is neutral content. Deleting critical content smacks of promotion. See for example, "The emissions generated by IQOS contains the identical harmful constituents as tobacco cigarette smoke, including volatile organic compounds at comparable levels to cigarette smoke, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at vast various ranges, and carbon monoxide. Each of these substances, on the basis of rigorous research of cigarette smoke, are known to result in significant harms to health." ] (]) 12:57, 31 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| == Ownership == | |||
| <s>You are exhibiting an alarming amount of ] over the ] article. References to "other articles" (which are largely your own creation also) are not valid arguments. The discussion of individual brands of a product properly lives under the marketing heading to avoid giving ] to the topic.</s> Apologies: I had thought you reverted my edit outright, rather than keeping a "Brands" heading. I still believe the "Brands" topic belongs as a subhead of "Marketing", but that is a fine point that I am willing to concede. ]<sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub> 14:11, 31 January 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :I can confirm the alarming amount of ]. All the examples are too numerous to list, but here's one. | |||
| :{| class="wikitable" | |||
| |- | |||
| ! His phrasing (placed under Research) | |||
| |- | |||
| | Organizations in Kenya are concerned that the nicotine pouches may raise the risk of cancer, heart disease, and reproductive or developmental harms.<ref name=Kabale2019/> Kenya Tobacco Control Alliance objected to the entrance of nicotine pouches in Kenya.<ref name=Kabale2019/> They stated that there is no reliable research that demonstrates nicotine pouches are safer than regular ]s.<ref name=Kabale2019>{{cite news|url=https://www.nation.co.ke/health/Tobacco-free-nicotine-pouches-proposal/3476990-5225488-imjgvj/index.html|title=Lobby has raised an alarm, saying the introduction of pouches could result in increased risk for cancer|last=Kabale|first=Nasibo|work=]|date=8 June 2019}}</ref> | |||
| |} | |||
| :{| class="wikitable" | |||
| |- | |||
| ! My rephrasing (moved to Opposition), CN and FV tags are his | |||
| |- | |||
| | The Kenya Tobacco Control Alliance objected to the entrance of nicotine pouches in Kenya.{{CN|date=February 2020}} They are concerned that the nicotine pouches may raise the risk of cancer, heart disease, and reproductive or developmental harms.{{FV|date=February 2020}} They also{{FV|date=February 2020}} stated that there is no reliable research that demonstrates nicotine pouches are safer than regular ]s.<ref name="Kabale2019">{{cite news|url=https://www.nation.co.ke/health/Tobacco-free-nicotine-pouches-proposal/3476990-5225488-imjgvj/index.html|title=Lobby has raised an alarm, saying the introduction of pouches could result in increased risk for cancer|last=Kabale|first=Nasibo|date=8 June 2019|work=]|access-date=24 November 2019|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20191202064133/https://www.nation.co.ke/health/Tobacco-free-nicotine-pouches-proposal/3476990-5225488-imjgvj/index.html|archive-date=2 December 2019|url-status=live}}</ref> | |||
| |} | |||
| :After my rephrasing he added CN and FV tags all over the place, despite the reference being very clear. It's like he sabotages content that he didn't write himself by adding ridiculous tagging requirements after every single sentence. Related sentences can be combined together, as long as the reference listed next applies to them all. He seems to use CN and FV tags in order to discourage participation on "his articles".] (]) 19:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| {{ref-talk}} | |||
| ::It is "Organizations in Kenya" not "They" The word "also" failed verification. Why was the citation removed from the sentence? How come the has not been removed from the article? ] (]) 19:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::My point exactly. He takes issue with the word "also" being used to string related sentences together, and requires a reference for it. "Organizations" were removed because the reference mentions a single organization. | |||
| :::Many of the other "failed verification" are also completely invalid, he puts it on pages from the government of Norway...] (]) 19:26, 3 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::See "Lobbies have raised an alarm, saying the pouches could result in increased risk for cancer, heart disease and reproductive or developmental effects." | |||
| ::::"Organizations" were removed but the sentence does not mention any single organization. The source does not verify the current claim. Sourced content was replaced failed verification content throughout the article. ] (]) 19:31, 3 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Again, the sentences are connected and should be read together. | |||
| :::::The article should perhaps be considered unreliable, considering how it consistently misspells the name of the organization Ketca as Ketco. "Lobbies" is too vague and unspecified to rely on, it could very well be another language error. ] (]) 19:37, 3 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::The word "Lobbies" does not mean "Kenya Tobacco Control Alliance". That's the reason it fails verification. "Organizations in Kenya" passed verifiability. Sourced content was obviously replaced with failed verification. ] (]) 19:40, 3 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::The article is clearly speaking about Ketca and not other organizations. "Organizations" (plural) is completely unsourced in the article. "Lobby" (singular) is used in the article title and ingress ("Lobby has raised an alarm, saying the introduction of pouches could result in increased risk for cancer"), it is clear that it is referring to the only lobby mentioned in the article. "Lobbies" is unusable as evidence of plurality.] (]) 19:54, 3 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::See "'''Lobbies''' have raised an alarm,...". That is plural not singular. The source is making a more general claim. ] (]) 20:04, 3 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::This has been continued here: ], as it became more relevant for an article talk page than a user talk page. ] (]) 20:07, 3 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Did you add the to the article? ] (]) 16:52, 5 February 2020 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 17:07, 30 December 2024
This user is taking a kit kat-break.
Check sources
www.scoop.it/t/the-future-of-e-cigarette
http://www.economist.com/topics/electronic-cigarettes
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/news/electronic-cigarettes/
Speedy deletion of Draft:Ayurveda
If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
The page Draft:Ayurveda has been speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This was done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appeared to be a direct copy from https://medium.com/@seozenius/ayurveda-the-ancient-indian-system-of-medicine-is-based-on-the-principle-of-maintaining-a-balance-d37f47436f0d. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition has been be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Misplaced Pages to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Misplaced Pages's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 11:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Vaping for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vaping, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Vaping until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
Copyvio on Health effects of electronic cigarettes
Your edit to Health effects of electronic cigarettes has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Misplaced Pages without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Misplaced Pages strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Misplaced Pages takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Misplaced Pages:Copying text from other sources for more information. ⸺RandomStaplers 03:58, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
CCI Notice
Hello, QuackGuru. This message is being sent to inform you that a request for a contributor copyright investigation has been filed at Contributor copyright investigations concerning your contributions to Misplaced Pages in relation to Misplaced Pages's copyrights policy. The listing can be found here. Thank you. ⸺RandomStaplers 04:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Randomstaplers: QuackGuru always followed sources very closely to minimize misinterpretation of what the source said but, as I remember, the wording was substantially rearranged and not a copyvio problem. I know copyright checking is painful and I don't want to add to the stress but would it be possible to give, say, two examples of text added to Misplaced Pages and the corresponding originals? I had a quick look at Health effects of electronic cigarettes but found it hard to identify a problem. Perhaps you could add an example at Talk:Health effects of electronic cigarettes. Thanks. Johnuniq (talk) 05:39, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
::* @Johnuniq: Go to https://copyvios.toolforge.org/ and paste in the URLs from the CCI. This one is pretty bad.⸺RandomStaplers 05:47, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Withdrawn. So far only one copyvio. Sorry for the trouble. I'll leave this up in case anyone else is confused. ⸺RandomStaplers 07:06, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq Withdrawn the CCI, only one actual copyvio so far: this Diff, with this document. ⸺RandomStaplers 07:08, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq I've gone ahead and addressed it. Hoping that's all of them.⸺RandomStaplers 08:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your work! Johnuniq (talk) 09:37, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
- @Johnuniq I've gone ahead and addressed it. Hoping that's all of them.⸺RandomStaplers 08:07, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Weasel word some span
Template:Weasel word some span has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 05:29, 31 August 2024 (UTC)