| Revision as of 03:30, 19 April 2024 edit2a02:cb80:401d:f74c:1:1:a243:8048 (talk) →what is underneath,,: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 17:00, 31 December 2024 edit undoQuicoleJR (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers15,062 edits Pretty major scandal.Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
| (4 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Talk header|age=365|bot=lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{afd-merged-from|I did not have sexual relations with that woman|I did not have sexual relations with that woman|11 July 2009}} |
|
{{afd-merged-from|I did not have sexual relations with that woman|I did not have sexual relations with that woman|11 July 2009}} |
|
{{On this day|date1=2004-08-17|oldid1=9955998|date2=2004-12-19|oldid2=8742503|date3=2005-12-19|oldid3=31949203|date4=2006-12-19|oldid4=95048557|date5=2012-01-26|oldid5=473259063|date6=2012-08-17|oldid6=507875002|date7=2015-08-17|oldid7=676253223|date8=2018-01-26|oldid8=822369139}} |
|
{{On this day|date1=2004-08-17|oldid1=9955998|date2=2004-12-19|oldid2=8742503|date3=2005-12-19|oldid3=31949203|date4=2006-12-19|oldid4=95048557|date5=2012-01-26|oldid5=473259063|date6=2012-08-17|oldid6=507875002|date7=2015-08-17|oldid7=676253223|date8=2018-01-26|oldid8=822369139}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=B|collapsed=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=B|collapsed=yes|listas=Lewinsky scandal|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Biography|living=yes |listas= Lewinsky scandal}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low|USPresidents=yes|USPresidents-importance=low}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=low|USPresidents=yes|USPresidents-importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid|American=yes|American-importance=mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=mid|American=yes|American-importance=high}} |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Old moves |
|
{{Old moves |
| Line 27: |
Line 27: |
|
| minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
| minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
== Ms./Miss == |
|
|
|
|
|
Clinton said: "I did not have sexual relations with that woman, Miss Lewinsky". Note "Miss" and not "Ms.". ] (]) 02:33, 14 February 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== 2003 ? == |
|
== 2003 ? == |
| Line 59: |
Line 55: |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 04:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
] (]) 04:42, 1 September 2023 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
== what is underneath,, == |
|
|
|
|
|
The american governmet spent close to 100 mil on this investigation, cimpared to 10 mil on 911,,, |
|
|
On the other hand, a top cia official during this event also was accused of sexualcase with a teenager, as i recal, she disapeared then the investigation started linking him to an appartment, the "government" Used a sate of art instroment to kink him with the case,, all of the sudden both lewinsky and the other "gal" where from Jewish back round, |
|
|
& the team of bill clinton made big steps towrd Palestinian file,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
The rest is in your hands... ] (]) 03:30, 19 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
Re : -"Steven C. LaTourette (R-OH) US Representative, voted to impeach Bill Clinton for the Lewinsky scandal while he himself, was having a long-term affair with his chief of staff, Jennifer Laptook. (2003" - what does the "(2003)" reference here? 84.13.36.104 (talk) 20:53, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
I think that the over-coverage claims need some more recent citations. These are all from the early 2000s and (I know this is OR territory here) attitudes towards scandals like this - particularly where one is in a position of power like Clinton - has shifted significantly since then in the US. More recent criticism seems to be on the nature of the coverage, not the over-coverage per se. —AFreshStart (talk) 16:05, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
I reviewed the other requests for moving this article, but it seems to me that this has never been discussed: Why is Lewinsky´s name in the title of this article? For me, this very much looks like victim blaming - because that is what she was: the victim in all of this. Perpetrator is definitely Bill Clinton, and maybe others - but Lewinsky? I cannot find anything in the article that suggest that she was part of the scandal - she had sex with a co-worker, which in itself is no concern of anyone. The scandal is about how Clinton behaved in the aftermath - but not how Lewinsky behaved. I dont know what the right title for this page would be, but would argue that the name "Lewinsky" should not be part of it.--Schreibvieh (talk) 09:13, 24 January 2023 (UTC)
I was trying to explain this article to my Taiwanese girlfriend who was unfamiliar with it and noticed that this article is extraordinarily unclear about what actually happened. The popular understanding, which has no doubt influenced many Americans’ personal relationships one way or another, is “Clinton got a blowjob in the oral office.” The type of sex act performed is also central to Clinton’s famous statements about the definition of “sexual relations.” But the word “blowjob” is nowhere in the article and “oral sex” does not appear in the introduction nor under “Allegations of sexual contact,” and only under “perjury charges,” where it is implied but not directly stated that Clinton received oral sex.
If this is correct, the article should include this information, because I think it is popularly believed, correctly or not, that “Clinton got a blowjob in the Oval Office.” The introduction to the article should provide enough information so that a reader knows what parts of that statement are or aren’t correct.
