Misplaced Pages

User talk:Pepperbeast: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:38, 13 March 2010 editPepperbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,700 edits →Mastic (resin) it is not Gum arabic !!!← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:17, 1 January 2025 edit undoRiteze (talk | contribs)356 edits →Convenient tag for a section name.: new sectionTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit Android app edit App talk topic 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
'''Welcome!'''
|archiveprefix=User talk:Pepperbeast/Archives/
|format=Y %%i
|age=1440
|minarchthreads=0
|minkeepthreads=0
|archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{resolved|,{{Resolved|,{{done}},{{Done}}</nowiki>
|header=<nowiki>{{Talkarchive}}</nowiki>
|headerlevel=2
|nogenerateindex=0
|maxkeepthreads=0
|maxkeepbytes=0
|maxarchsize=150000
|numberstart=1
|archivebox=yes
|box-advert=yes
}}


== ] ==
Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ]{{#if:{{{art|}}}|, especially what you did for ]|}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
*]
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a ]! Please ] on talk pages using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out ], ask me on {{#if:{{{1|}}}|]|my talk page}}, or ask your question and then place <code><nowiki>{{</nowiki>]<nowiki>}}</nowiki></code> before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!&nbsp;<!-- Template:Welcome --> ] 23:18, 2 August 2007 (UTC)


I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)


== Not unnecessary ==
==Mince meat article==
Hi Beastiepaws. I am for ridding wikipedia of urban myth and old wives tales but the ''The Cambridge World History of Food'' discusses the use of clove and cinnamon bark in at least two places, one about mince meat, being used to mask off flavors. ] (]) 13:59, 18 December 2007 (UTC)


not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. ] (]) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Hi again Beastiepaws. Perhaps the "World History of Food" is wrong. I see the Scully endnote. I'm at owrk not a home now. I'll revert my undo, and recheck tonight. ] (]) <small>—Preceding ] was added at 14:07, 18 December 2007 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== Unnecessary reversion. ==


If some other page want to link directly to , how would it do that? ] (]) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
I was pretty sure there is no meat in mince meat. I thought someone else was putting that in to throw people off. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 20:26, 22 December 2009 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


:What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? ] ] 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
==Coriander==
Please do not categorize my edits as vandalism, as you did in your edit summary for ]. It is well known that people who taste soap while eating cilantro are genetically defective, and my edits were in good faith. ] (]) 01:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC) ::Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. ] (]) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
:::You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. ] ] 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
::::There are not only (wikipedia) users who browse these pages, but external websites might also want to make links to necessary information present there. ] (]) 02:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::There is nothing to be gained by deep-linking to information that isn't there. ] ] 02:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::There is important information about Astrological leader, Deity, Symbol, Indian zodiac, Tropical zodiac and more about the entity. ] (]) 02:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::Where is it you want to link ''from''? ] ] 03:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::. ] (]) 03:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::OK, no. Don't add unnecessary anchors to Misplaced Pages to suit the needs of your own web site. ] ] 03:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::There might be many others who might be trying the same. ] (]) 03:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::And? Why don't you just put the information on your own page? ] ] 04:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::If a copy of information from wikipedia is placed in one's own page, it will result in duplication of information. Moreover, readers will be deprived of timely updates to the information as and when they take place. ] (]) 04:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::::::::::Well, I'm sorry, but deleting anchors that nothing on WP links to is just normal housekeeping. WP editors aren't responsible for your web site. Either maintain your own information or link in a sensible way. ] ] 05:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
::::::::::::::Can you suggest any other way (which you think is sensible) of linking? This and its peers are significant topics, each of which deserves an anchor of their own, irrespective of weather they are linked to any external website or not. ] (]) 10:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)


== January 2025 ==
:Your edit was, at best, unconstructive. The article on coriander states there is no established genetic basis for differences in perception of coriander and provides references to back up the claim. Even it it *were* genetically based, that wouldn't make people who perceive a particular flavour "defective". Genetic variations are not not necessarily defects. They're just variations. ] (]) 02:12, 15 January 2009 (UTC)


] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]&#32; according to the reverts you have made on ]. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to ] with others, to avoid editing ], and to ], rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
== March 2009 ==


Points to note:
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{#if:|'''{{{reason}}}'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. {{#if:|] (]) 12:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 --> Spamming and vandalism. ] (]) 12:17, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
# '''Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;'''
# '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.'''
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases, it may be appropriate to ]. If you engage in an edit war, you '''may be ] from editing.''' <!-- Template:uw-ew --> ] ] 05:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)


== Convenient tag for a section name. ==
{{tlx|unblock|reason}}
{| width="75%" align="center" class="notice noprint" style="background: none; border: 1px solid #aaa; padding: 0.5em; margin: 0.5em auto;"
|-
| valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | ]
| style="padding: 0.1em" |


A simple convenient tag was added to a long section name which contained some special characters too. is not constructive in this sense. ] (]) 13:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
'''Your request to be unblocked''' has been '''granted''' for the following reason(s):
<br><br>Absolutely my mistake, I blocked the wrong party. Totally my error, for which I apologise. I have, prior to this message, unblocked the account (and removed the autoblocks I could find) with a note that the block was totally my fault. I hope that you have not been inconvenienced too much, and can only once again say that I am truly sorry for the error. ] (]) 21:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

''Request handled by:'' ] (]) 21:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

<small> '''Unblocking administrator''': Please check for <span class="plainlinks"> on this user after accepting the unblock request.</small>
<!-- Request accepted (after-block request) -->
|}

:I have contacted the blocking admin. --<font color="Red">]</font><sup><font color="Black">]</font></sup> 19:49, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

::Thanks ] (]) 21:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

== ] ==

The 'Facts versus opinions about The Society for Creative Anachronism ' section you were involved in was moved to bottom to be in chronological order. Thank you. ] (]) 20:56, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

:Brilliant, thanks :-) ] (]) 21:37, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

== ] it is not ] !!! ==

" ] " system made of ] tree ! ,
And " ] " is made out of ] tree ! . Unfortunately many people in the world do not know this spice is known to only a few in the ] , And a secret except for people as a great healer. I ask not to be confused with Gum arabic is something else entirely! . " Mastic is made of wood and Pistacia lentiscus ". And Gum arabic is produced from a Acacia tree resin. This spice also does not appear in any dictionary in the world and the first time he appears in the encyclopedia That he always appears in the encyclopedia as a " resin of Pistacia lentiscus " . ] (]) 09:01, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
:Beastiepaws, thanks for your persistent effort at working the mastic article into shape. It got speedily deleted in other languages such as ] as an incomprehensible translation (''traducció automàtica incomprensible''), but here in English it seems to be worth keeping. I intend to continue helping, but some days I have limited energy available for this. __ ] (]) 22:02, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
::Thanks, Bill-- I appreciate that. I'm doing my best, but having to tuck it in around Real Life. :-) ] (]) 22:52, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Beastiepaws, Why delete the line about " Athens University " ? ] (]) 23:39, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
:Because it was an uncited claim. ] (]) 00:22, 12 March 2010 (UTC)


I inquired and found there are some imitations and substitutes for " Mastic " Because of the high price, Such as :

1 - Pine tree resin

2 - Almond tree resin

3 - Boswellia tree resin

i think we should put New paragraph for it also . ] (]) 22:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
:You should use the talk page for the mastic article to discuss this. ] (]) 22:38, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 13:17, 1 January 2025


Archives (Index)

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Dutch exonyms

I think this was kept but consensus seems to have changed. Do you want to nominate this again? Bearian (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Not unnecessary

This is not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. Riteze (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Unnecessary reversion.

If some other page want to link directly to Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, how would it do that? Riteze (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? PepperBeast (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. PepperBeast (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
There are not only (wikipedia) users who browse these pages, but external websites might also want to make links to necessary information present there. Riteze (talk) 02:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
There is nothing to be gained by deep-linking to information that isn't there. PepperBeast (talk) 02:12, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
There is important information about Astrological leader, Deity, Symbol, Indian zodiac, Tropical zodiac and more about the entity. Riteze (talk) 02:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Where is it you want to link from? PepperBeast (talk) 03:06, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
From here. Riteze (talk) 03:09, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
OK, no. Don't add unnecessary anchors to Misplaced Pages to suit the needs of your own web site. PepperBeast (talk) 03:19, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
There might be many others who might be trying the same. Riteze (talk) 03:58, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
And? Why don't you just put the information on your own page? PepperBeast (talk) 04:13, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
If a copy of information from wikipedia is placed in one's own page, it will result in duplication of information. Moreover, readers will be deprived of timely updates to the information as and when they take place. Riteze (talk) 04:43, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Well, I'm sorry, but deleting anchors that nothing on WP links to is just normal housekeeping. WP editors aren't responsible for your web site. Either maintain your own information or link in a sensible way. PepperBeast (talk) 05:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Can you suggest any other way (which you think is sensible) of linking? This and its peers are significant topics, each of which deserves an anchor of their own, irrespective of weather they are linked to any external website or not. Riteze (talk) 10:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Bluecoats Drum and Bugle Corps. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Bgsu98 (Talk) 05:30, 1 January 2025 (UTC)

Convenient tag for a section name.

A simple convenient tag was added to a long section name which contained some special characters too. Your edit is not constructive in this sense. Riteze (talk) 13:17, 1 January 2025 (UTC)