| Revision as of 15:32, 10 May 2024 edit82.20.46.48 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 18:34, 1 January 2025 edit undoChiswick Chap (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers297,143 edits rv editing test, that's in the article, and this is not your sandbox, nor a forumTags: Undo Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit |
| (20 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
|
|
{{afd-merged-from|Taurine cattle|Taurine cattle|10 March 2022}} |
|
{{afd-merged-from|Taurine cattle|Taurine cattle|10 March 2022}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Skip to talk}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=180|archive_units=days|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} |
|
{{Talk header|search=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{WikiProject Agriculture|importance=top|livestock=yes|livestock-importance=top}} |
|
{{WikiProject Agriculture|importance=top|livestock=yes|livestock-importance=top}} |
| Line 32: |
Line 31: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Issue in ] == |
|
== Greenhouse gas percentage? == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] |
|
@] As ] has been in power for a while now so there is less deforestation would it be OR to ignore land use change and simply tick the 4 Climate Trace boxes which mention “cattle”? Also we could link to their methodology, which they explain in detail. Then the lead could just say “more than 4%” which is not likely to change for years. |
|
|
|
] is displayed in section {{Section link|Cattle#Digestive system}}. The source of the image is "Fig 1. Phylogenetic classification of the rumen microbiome as revealed by metagenomic analysis." from paper . |
|
|
|
|
|
|
In bottom center of the image (labeled "a", captioned {{tq|'''a'''. Pie chart for microbial classification at the domain level. Averages are from all fecal and rumen liquor samples.}}), a small pie chart is split into three parts. Arrows from these slices point to three corresponding bar charts. The arrow from the blue (]) slice points to a bar chart (labeled "e", captioned {{tq|'''e.''' Stacked bar plot of relative abundance of the dominant phyla in the ''Eukaryota'' domain.}}) with six items: |
|
I mean although the FAO is presumably a more reliable source than Climate Trace a lot has changed since 2015, and I have not yet been able to find the FAO methodology. ] (]) 07:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:: It sounds extremely risky to me, so please, let's not do it. Further, this article is currently going through a GAN review, so it's definitely not a great moment. A third thing: this is not the right article for intricate detail on environmental matters, as it's the top-level article on all things Cattle; we already have ] for exactly that subject. ] (]) 08:22, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Ah thanks I did not notice that article - I will move some detail there and ask on that talk page ] (]) 13:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::OK I have put a lot of detail in the main article and the answer seems to be between 4% and 12%. If anyone from the FAO is reading this where are your methodology and error bars please? ] (]) 12:35, 27 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::: I don't think you'll get an answer that way, and I do think your own methodology of calculation and inference is extremely close to the ] boundary. ] (]) 13:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* ] |
|
According to All the Mammals of the world there are 4 species of cattle: Bos frontalis, Bos domesticus, Bos taurus and Bos indicus. Pls can you change it? |
|
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* '''Other ]''' |
|
|
* '''unclassified (])''' |
|
|
|
|
|
Arrow from the grey (]) slice points to a bar chart with: |
|
|
|
|
|
* '''Other ]''' |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
* ] |
|
|
|
|
|
It seems that there is a mix-up both in the original paper and in the file on Commons. Either the blue and grey parts are mixed up, or the arrows from pie chart to bar charts are wrong. I couldn't find ] for this paper. |
|
|
|
|
|
Pinging ], the original uploader of the image, who also added it in ]. —] (]) 19:03, 17 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Best would be a bit of rearranging using a raster graphics editor. ] (]) 04:07, 18 August 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Well since nobody seems to be trampling everyone to death rushing to fix the image, I've fixed it myself. ] (]) 13:56, 10 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Semi-protected edit request on 11 September 2024 == |
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit semi-protected|Cattle|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Young male cattle are called bull calves, once they are castrated they are called steers for the first 12 months then they are bullocks or oxen. ] (]) 20:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
: Not done: leaving aside that Misplaced Pages isn't a dictionary, we can't insert text without citing a reliable source; nor is it obvious where this might go in the article. |
It seems that there is a mix-up both in the original paper and in the file on Commons. Either the blue and grey parts are mixed up, or the arrows from pie chart to bar charts are wrong. I couldn't find errata for this paper.
Young male cattle are called bull calves, once they are castrated they are called steers for the first 12 months then they are bullocks or oxen. 58.179.75.144 (talk) 20:36, 11 September 2024 (UTC)
level-3 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
