Misplaced Pages

User talk:Larry Hockett: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:12, 25 November 2023 editBenison (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers44,276 edits Reverted 1 edit by The Herald (talk): Mayb they were LTA.Tags: Twinkle Undo← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:35, 3 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,091 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Larry Hockett/Archive 19) (bot 
(77 intermediate revisions by 28 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
}} }}


== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
== Darryl Strawberry is a FOUR time WS Champion. ==


<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
Hi, just trying to update a page where I know the information is correct - but it keeps reverting to incorrect information. It’s Darryl Strawberry’s information page. He is a four time World Series Champion. Not 3. While I understand he didn’t play in the ‘98 WS - he was on the active roster until a colon cancer diagnosis after
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div>
the start of the 1998 playoffs, at which point he was moved to the disabled list and Ledee was call to the active roster. In MLB, the players who are awarded with a ring, and being considered a “World Series Champion” are anyone who stood in the batter’s box, or on the pitcher’s mound for the winning team during that season. Darryl Strawberry is a 4 time WS Champion. 1986 with the NY Mets and 1996, 1998, and 1999 with the NY Yankees. Please update. ] (]) 04:56, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.


The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
:Hi Dennis - Article content issues are not usually best discussed on user talk pages, because this may leave interested parties out of the discussion. For this issue, you might discuss at ] or ]. See Archive 46 at WT:BASEBALL for one recent discussion. Our common approach on Misplaced Pages, which mirrors the approach used at reliable sources like Baseball Reference, is usually to omit the WS as an infobox highlight if the player was not on the postseason roster. ] (]) 05:06, 26 September 2023 (UTC)


If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
== ] reversion ==


</div>
Hi! I noticed your reversion of Bespi024's edit just now. Do you think that's AI-generated? They've made several similar rapid-fire edits to various articles and they all sound similar. ] ] 03:04, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1258243549 -->


{{-}}
:I thought about that, but I don't think it changes our response. ] (]) 03:08, 2 October 2023 (UTC)
== Always precious ==
]
Ten years ago, ] were found precious. That's what you are, always. --] (]) 08:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)


== 2025 Update from Women in Green ==
::Totally agree. ] ] 03:13, 2 October 2023 (UTC)


<div style="border: 6px solid #2bbf08; background: #FFF; background-color:#FFFFFF; color: #000000; padding: 1ex 1ex 1ex 1.5ex; margin: 0px 0px 1em 1em; font-size: 99%">
== Asking for help ==
]
]
Hello {{<includeonly>safesubst:</includeonly>BASEPAGENAME}}:


2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for ]! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around ] and another on ]. We also managed to achieve most of our ], nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved!
Can you look at this link - I think the INVESTIGATIONS section is misnamed - I tried an edit -- it was reverted with alacrity - your thoughts would be helpful - if I change it - I get beaten on.


For 2025 we have ] for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our ] being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to ]. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you!


This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around!
] ] (]) 17:45, 7 November 2023 (UTC)


] (])
:I think it's more likely to be an error or misunderstanding than a beating, unless I'm really missing something big here. Is there any talk page discussion of this? I would maybe start there. Maybe work to clarify the meaning of ''investigations''. To me, in the context of a medical specialty, it would refer to something like lab tests or X-rays. ] (]) 18:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

::I agree - yes, there is a talk section - it really should read 'Knowledge Requirements' or some such.
{{small|You are receiving this message as a member of the ]. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications ].}}
::As to the beating - I'd like to think you are correct - but I have my doubts, I do have a stalker - they may seriously not see it as such - but there is a fairly clear pattern -

::Small detail - but it does make the article read badly. ] (]) 18:20, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
</div>
:::Something to consider: You may find that other editors are more receptive to your points in that discussion if you remove the extra question marks and the all-caps text. I know it must be stressful to be reverted frequently, particularly if there's an unsatisfactory edit summary with the revert, but I think this message may not have the intended effect. If it's a simple mistake, there's usually an editor who won't mind discussing or fixing the issue, but if it comes across as a situation involving unnecessary drama, people may hesitate to get involved. ] (]) 18:31, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

::::It is good feedback - I do have to work on the tendency to lean on professional experience - and developing digital consensus is a bit of an art form - a few articles I did manage to enhance IMHO - without any perceived conflict - I do find the minor edits - as in this section title - to be so obvious that I cannot understand why someone wants to be dramatic - thanks for the feedback. ] (]) 18:37, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
] (]) 09:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:DreamRimmer@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Women_in_Green/Mail-list&oldid=1266971077 -->

Latest revision as of 19:35, 3 January 2025

User

Talk

Questions? Comments? Advice? Talk to me.

Contribs

Promoted

Thank you.

Gallery

Interesting pics.

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19



This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present.

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Always precious

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

2025 Update from Women in Green

Hello Larry Hockett:

2024 has wrapped up, and what a full year it was for WikiProject Women in Green! Over the past year, we hosted two edit-a-thons, one themed around women's history and another on women around the world. We also managed to achieve most of our 2024 annual goals, nominating 75 articles for GA, reviewing 64 GA nominations, nominating 8 articles for FAC, peer reviewing 3 articles and reviewing 10 FAC nominations. Excellent work, and thank you to everyone involved!

For 2025 we have a new set of goals for nominations and reviews. In particular, we would like to see more articles on our Hot 100 list being improved and nominated for GA this year. If you take a look at the list and see an article you are interested in contributing to, feel free to add it and yourself to our Hot 100 project discussion. You might even find someone interested in collaborating with you!

This year, as with every year, we hope you will join us in helping improve our coverage of women and women's works on this encyclopedia. Every contribution helps. We'll see you around!

Grnrchst (talk)

You are receiving this message as a member of the WikiProject Women in Green. You can remove yourself from receiving notifications here.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:46, 3 January 2025 (UTC)