| Revision as of 21:15, 21 October 2023 editBD2412 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, IP block exemptions, Administrators2,453,990 edits →IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications: :{{tpw|c}} I would suggest, as an alternative to reversing to a different outcome, that this discussion be relisted with a relisting note requesting a more specific basis in policy for keeping the article.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 21:23, 3 January 2025 edit undoWwew345t (talk | contribs)312 edits →Sophie clarke: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (32 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| |counter = 26 | |counter = 26 | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| Declaration: I recently logged into my daughter's account to upload and post some images to her sandbox for her university course. For privacy reasons I will not be publicly disclosing her account but will do so privately to any admin in good standing. This was a one time thing and there is no intention for me to edit further using her account. By the way uploading images on mobile is needlessly difficult event for a user who has been around since 2006.... ] <sup>'']''</sup> 15:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{-}} | {{-}} | ||
| == |
== Restore for updating == | ||
| Heyy! Can you please restore ] page in my personal space, so I could continue improving it until it's ready to be published again? Thanks! --] (]) 16:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| I noticed you recently closed the AfC for this article as "merge". At the time of the AfD nomination, the article was in a state that it could've been merged or deleted. However, the AfD nominator's rationale for deletion was flawed. On top of that, I was able to expand the article by about six times its original length using several sources which I cited in the article. All citations were from reputable sources that meet ]. I get that there was a second "merge" vote recently in the AfD, but I'm wondering whether anyone read the article before moving to wipe it? Any clarification would be helpful. Thanks! —] (]) 06:48, 19 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Let me have a look at it. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 18:27, 19 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ok, there were 6 citations at the time of deletion but having reviewed the sources myself I think the other commentators were right in their assessment. | |||
| ::1 EMIC article, this is a website with no author on this page and its structured a bit like a press release. Not clear independent, fact checked or reliable source, not counting imo | |||
| ::2 muusikaplant, another website but the article is not about the orchestra in any meaningful way. Its an account of a forthcoming concert and tells us little about the orchestra, this lacks necessary detail imo | |||
| ::3 ajakirimuusika no byline, reads like a press release more about the conductor then the orchestra. Unclear on independence and reliability some wouldn’t count for me | |||
| ::4 klaasikaradio namecheck in an article about an person. This in no way is GNG coverage | |||
| ::5 schott-music - namecheck so inadequate | |||
| ::6 sirp - no byline, no indication this is a reliable source. | |||
| ::so overall, I’m not seeing anything here allowing me to disregard the views of the other editors. Have you looked at ] to understand how to evidence a reliable source.? Happy to review if you get more information. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 19:30, 19 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks for the reply! I have to refresh my memory on nos. 2, 3, and 4, but ''Muusikka'' is the leading Estonian classical music magazine, comparable to '']'' in English. Their article is not about the conductor, but about the PCO's announcement of a new music director and why it chose Mänd. As for EMIC and ''Sirp'', they are respectively the national musical directory of Estonia and a major arts weekly that goes back to the Soviet period: both are published by the ]. All meet ] and also meet ] (especially "reliable", "sources", and "independent of the subject"). —] (]) 05:47, 20 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Been thinking about this with the extra context I'm not as comfortable with the close as I was originally. The problem is I can't just set aside the views of the other contributors and if I relist I suspect we won't get much interest in further reviews. | |||
| ::::I suggest you contact the other contributors, point them in the direction of this discussion and ask them if they would be prepared to reconsider their views on the light of the sources you introduced. If they agree that gives me a basis to reclose based on updated views. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 07:43, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Thanks! In the event that they don't, since the decision had been to merge, would it be OK to restore some of this material within the merged article? —] (]) 16:08, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Good Afternoon, Can you please userfy the deleted article for me? | |||
| == Article delition == | |||
| https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jorge_Gracie_(2nd_nomination) | |||
| Why did you delete the page ], when significant media coverage has been proven by myself in the deletion discussion? --] (]) 12:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) 20:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Your sources were all impeached in the discussion and literally no other editor supported retention of the article. Please see ] and I will review if you provide the three best sources and explain how they meet ] ] <sup>'']''</sup> 19:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::Alright. So, here's the three sources: | |||
| ::1. ] <ref>{{Cite web |title=Співачка Masha Danilova: Завдяки хейтерам, я заробила грошей. Мій кліп подивилися багато разів |url=https://www.unian.ua/lite/stars/spivachka-masha-danilova-dyakuyuchi-heyteram-ya-zarobila-groshey-miy-klip-podivilisya-bagato-raziv-12330516.html |access-date=2023-10-20 |website=www.unian.ua |language=uk}}</ref> | |||
| ::2. ] <ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-07-15 |title=16-річна онучка секретаря РНБО Олексія Данілова запрем'єрила кліп просто у центрі Києва |url=https://tsn.ua/glamur/16-richna-onuchka-sekretarya-rnbo-oleksiya-danilova-zaperm-yerila-klip-prosto-u-centri-kiyeva-2370868.html |access-date=2023-10-20 |website=ТСН.ua |language=uk}}</ref> | |||
| ::3. ] <ref>{{Cite web |title=Онучка секретаря РНБО Данілова – 16-річна співачка Маша Данілова зізналася, що багато хто хоче з нею товаришувати через відоме прізвище |url=https://gordonua.com/ukr/bulvar/news/vnuchka-sekretarja-rnbo-danilova-16-richna-spivachka-masha-danilova-ziznalasja-shcho-bagato-hto-hoche-z-neju-druzhiti-cherez-vidome-prizvishche-1659985.html |access-date=2023-10-20 |website=Гордон {{!}} Gordon |language=uk}}</ref> | |||
| ::Although it was hard to choose, because there were other articles in popular Ukrainian media websites. So according to GNG, the sources must be: | |||
| ::* "'''Presumed'''" — well from this three sources I can definitely say, that the person mentioned there should have their own article. It would be a mess if you add all of it to, for example, the page of ]. She already received significant popularity and was present in Ukrainian YouTube Music TOP-100 charts.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Ukraine Youtube Top 100 Songs |url=https://www.top-charts.com/songs/all-genres/ukraine/youtube/2023-W08 |access-date=2023-10-20 |website=www.top-charts.com |language=en}}</ref> | |||
| ::* "'''Significant coverage'''" — the sources' articles are directly about the singer or an event, that is directly linked to the singer. | |||
| ::* "'''Reliable'''" — the three sources mentioned are one of the most read media in Ukraine, and are considered strongly reliable in Ukrainian Misplaced Pages, and by English standarts these ones should also easily pass. | |||
| ::* "'''Sources'''" — the page has a lot of sources, most of them are secondary (this three I mentioned are secondary as well). Primary ones were only used to support the release dates, used in the Misplaced Pages article, as YouTube shows the most accurate date of release. | |||
| ::* "'''Independent of the subject'''" — this three sources have no relation either with the show business industry, music industry, or the singer herself. Most of the ones (but not all) mentioned on the page are also not related to the music industry whatsoever. | |||
| ::] (]) 09:34, 20 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::The first source is an interview so isn't independent and the others are too short and look very tabloidy, which we wouldn't use for sources. This feels short to me and as I said every other contributor to the discussion felt the article should be deleted. This may be a case of ] ] <sup>'']''</sup> 06:58, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Hm, alright, I guess it might be ]. Can you restore it in my playground space (or how's called, I forgot..), so I could update it ocasionally? I have it backed up, but not the updated and fixed version. Thanks! --] (]) 08:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :{{tpw|c}} This close was an straightforward correct evaluation of consensus. ] ] 21:12, 19 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| {{reflist-talk}} | |||
| == |
== Deletion review for ] == | ||
| As requested: an editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ] ] 22:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message == | |||
| The discussion clearly has a consensus for keep. That people base their arguments on an essay rather than "official" policy is reflective of the fact that "official" policy is out of whack with what is best for Misplaced Pages. This is exactly why we have ]. Please undo this closure.  <span style="font-variant:small-caps; whitespace:nowrap;">] {] · ] · ] · ]}</span> 09:32, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| *Hi Spartaz! I second what Headbomb says. This journal is included in three of the most selective databases around (Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded, Index Medicus). If this is not a "keep", then >95% of journal articles can be deleted, too. As for NJournals, sure, it's an essai and not a guideline, but it clearly describes why I think this is notable enough for inclusion. Please have another look, IMHO at worst this should have been a "no consensus". Thanks. --] (]) 13:13, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">]</div> | |||
| *:What is the guiding policy you think I should apply? ] <sup>'']''</sup> 13:24, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| *I didn't express a keep/delete opinion in that discussion, although I participated, but that close is a ] if I ever saw one. It has no basis in consensus of the discussants. Please reconsider your bad close. Your close rationale should be listed as a "delete" opinion instead, which would at least bring the discussion closer to no-consensus instead of consensus-keep. —] (]) 16:53, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| *:What policy compliant votes did I ignore. Please explain the supervote in a way that doesn't mean you disagree with the close. ] <sup>'']''</sup> 20:11, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| *::You are supposed to assess the consensus of the discussion, and close according to that consensus, rather than interjecting your own opinion on what the result should be and closing based on that opinion. Your close rationale obviously did not do that. All comments there were legitimate discussions of whether the sourcing was adequate for the article, most of them agreeing that it was, with only one dissenting delete opinion. That is clearly not a consensus that sourcing is inadequate. Even if you threw out all comments but the delete, for reasons, one delete comment is not enough to establish a consensus. As for your assumption that I am arguing with you here only because I disagree with the result: This is a gross violation of ], and is contradicted by my initial sentence, which I'll quote again for you as you seem to have missed it the first time: {{tq|I didn't express a keep/delete opinion in that discussion}}. —] (]) 21:09, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :{{tpw|c}} I would suggest, as an alternative to reversing to a different outcome, that this discussion be relisted with a relisting note requesting a more specific basis in policy for keeping the article. ] ] 21:15, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Kowasek deletion == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small> | |||
| Can you please send the deleted page to user ksherin? Ty. ] (]) 20:26, 21 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1187132049 --> | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="afd-notice"> | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ] is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ''']''' until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.<!-- Template:Afd notice --></div> ] ] 15:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 4#2014 Chula Vista mayoral election}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; padding:2px;">]]</span>🏳️⚧ 01:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == "]" listed at ] == | |||
| ] | |||
| The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 4#2018 Chula Vista mayoral election}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; padding:2px;">]]</span>🏳️⚧ 01:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == PAR Technology Deletion Review == | |||
| Hi there! For full disclosure upfront, I'm a PAR employee. I submitted a brief write up requesting for a review of PAR Technology's page deletion from a few years ago. I have detailed reasoning based on new information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2024_June_13 | |||
| Can you please have a look and let me know if this is something we can discuss? Many thanks! ] (]) 13:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :== Deletion review for ] == | |||
| An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRV notice --> ] (]) 13:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=PAR_Technology&action=edit&redlink=1 ] (]) 13:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Invitation to participate in a research == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this ''''''. | |||
| You do not have to be an Administrator to participate. | |||
| The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ] . | |||
| Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns. | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| ] | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins&oldid=27650221 --> | |||
| == Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its ] and view its ]. | |||
| Take the survey ''''''. | |||
| Kind Regards, | |||
| ] | |||
| <bdi lang="en" dir="ltr">] (]) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC) </bdi> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:UOzurumba (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/search/?title=UOzurumba_(WMF)/sandbox_Research_announcement_list_for_enwiki_Current_Admins_(reminders)&oldid=27744339 --> | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| </div> | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| == Sophie clarke == | |||
| I was told to come to the deleteing admin i would like to express my concern that the nominater of said page is extremely biased againt pages like this these pages have been considered notable for years and there were onlyn2 particpents in the afd including the nominator who i feel is biased ] (]) 21:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 21:23, 3 January 2025
 Archives |
|
Archive 1 * Archive 2 * Archive 3 * Archive 4 * Archive 5 * Archive 6 * Archive 7 * Archive 8 * Archive 9 * Archive 10 * Archive 11 * Archive 12 * Archive 13 * Archive 14 * Archive 15 * Archive 16 * Archive 17 * Archive 18 * Archive 19 * Archive 20 * Archive 21 * Archive 22 * Archive 23 * Archive 24 * Archive 25 * Archive 26 * Archive 27 |
Spartaz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
I'm a long term user (first edit 2006) and have been an admin on or off since 2007. When we first started there was so much idealism and we really had no strong policies about inclusion except a desire to have some level of sourcing. As time moved on we became more structured and around the time I became an admin in 2007 we were grappling with the concept of collapsing non notable articles into lists which I was at the forefront of as a regular afd closer and constant presence at DRV. I had a lot of patience once and for that reason was regular DRV closer for a long time after GR Berry left the project. Sadly, my patience was degraded over time and getting involved in the PORNBIO wars pretty much washed out a lot of the good faith that policy and courtesy quite rightly requires us to show. This was again a major change in our approach to content and one of the first SNGs that was deprecated in favour of a more rigid approach to proper sourcing. Since then our content in this area has become much better and we are seeing similar struggles now in the sports arena where SNGs are slowly giving way to GNG level standards.
I have always taken a very legalistic approach to closing discussions that I recognise does not fit well to the current community standard, where low participation level allowing more brigading of votes or allowing more non-policy based arguments. For this reason I'm not really closing discussions but will still happily review old closes. Otherwise I mostly review and nominate unsuitable content as a BLP is a serious matter and needs to be properly sourced.
i am willing to userfy deleted articles for improvement as long as there is a reasonable likelihood that they can be saved. If you are challenging a deletion, do you have three good sources?
Useful Links:
- Please don't leave talkback templates as I always watchlist pages when I edit and I'm perfectly capable of looking for a reply myself.
Declaration: I recently logged into my daughter's account to upload and post some images to her sandbox for her university course. For privacy reasons I will not be publicly disclosing her account but will do so privately to any admin in good standing. This was a one time thing and there is no intention for me to edit further using her account. By the way uploading images on mobile is needlessly difficult event for a user who has been around since 2006.... Spartaz 15:55, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Restore for updating
Heyy! Can you please restore Masha Danilova page in my personal space, so I could continue improving it until it's ready to be published again? Thanks! --Oleh325 (talk) 16:00, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Good Afternoon, Can you please userfy the deleted article for me?
https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Jorge_Gracie_(2nd_nomination)
BlackAmerican (talk) 20:04, 25 October 2023 (UTC)
Deletion review for Alex Zhavoronkov
As requested: an editor has asked for a deletion review of Alex Zhavoronkov. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. BD2412 T 22:38, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of The Gruffalo's Child for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Gruffalo's Child is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/The Gruffalo's Child until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.BD2412 T 15:24, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
"2014 Chula Vista mayoral election" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect 2014 Chula Vista mayoral election has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 4 § 2014 Chula Vista mayoral election until a consensus is reached. Isla🏳️⚧ 01:36, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
"2018 Chula Vista mayoral election" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect 2018 Chula Vista mayoral election has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 4 § 2018 Chula Vista mayoral election until a consensus is reached. Isla🏳️⚧ 01:37, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
PAR Technology Deletion Review
Hi there! For full disclosure upfront, I'm a PAR employee. I submitted a brief write up requesting for a review of PAR Technology's page deletion from a few years ago. I have detailed reasoning based on new information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2024_June_13
Can you please have a look and let me know if this is something we can discuss? Many thanks! LeLiPAR (talk) 13:57, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- == Deletion review for PAGE NAME ==
An editor has asked for a deletion review of PAGE NAME. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. LeLiPAR (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
- https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=PAR_Technology&action=edit&redlink=1 LeLiPAR (talk) 13:58, 14 June 2024 (UTC)
Invitation to participate in a research
Hello,
The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Misplaced Pages, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.
You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.
The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .
Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:22, 23 October 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to participate in Misplaced Pages research
Hello,
I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Misplaced Pages. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.
Take the survey here.
Kind Regards,
BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:18, 13 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Sophie clarke
I was told to come to the deleteing admin i would like to express my concern that the nominater of said page is extremely biased againt pages like this these pages have been considered notable for years and there were onlyn2 particpents in the afd including the nominator who i feel is biased Wwew345t (talk) 21:23, 3 January 2025 (UTC)