Misplaced Pages

talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:51, 23 June 2024 editRevelationDirect (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users173,562 edits Requested move at Talk:Randolph House (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania)#Requested move 10 June 2024: CFD← Previous edit Latest revision as of 04:14, 4 January 2025 edit undoUsernamekiran (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers34,887 edits Notifying of requested move using rmCloser 
(26 intermediate revisions by 14 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{shortcut|WT:NRHP}} {{shortcut|WT:NRHP}}
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|class=Project|needs-infobox=no}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2009-09-28/WikiProject report|||day=28|month=September|year=2009}} {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2009-09-28/WikiProject report|||day=28|month=September|year=2009}}
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-10-17/WikiProject report|||day =17|month=October|year=2011}} {{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/Templates/Signpost article link for WikiProjects|link=Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2011-10-17/WikiProject report|||day =17|month=October|year=2011}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject National Register of Historic Places|needs-infobox=no}}
}}
{{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot II |age= 1 |units=month |index=/Archive index }} {{Archives |auto=yes |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot II |age= 1 |units=month |index=/Archive index }}
{{Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/to do talkbox}} {{Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/to do talkbox}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config {{User:MiszaBot/config
|maxarchivesize = 250K |maxarchivesize = 250K
|counter = 69 |counter = 70
|algo = old(30d) |algo = old(30d)
|archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Archive %(counter)d |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places/Archive %(counter)d
Line 15: Line 17:
}} }}


==] / ] ==
== Website of the current occupant that just so happens to be occupying a NRHP property ==
The question is, should the website of the current tenant/business of NRHP buildings be included as EL or in infobox as the website? ] (]) 01:46, 17 February 2024 (UTC) I can't find this NRHP property on Misplaced Pages. NRHP documents . What am I missing? ] (]) 23:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
:Good catch. It's definitely on the NRHP. The reference number is and the address is . Some photos of the house can be found . You can update ] with the information if you'd like. ] (]) 04:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)


== Requested move at ] ==
:To me, it's a matter of notability. I don't think whatever fly-by-night business that happens to be occupying a property warrants inclusion in an article at all; however, if the business is a notable one, or if it's been an occupant long enough to have accumulated local/regional press, then it likely would be mentioned in the article's prose. At that point, depending on the degree of notability, it would then warrant an external link and possibly the link in the infobox. ] (]) 23:30, 17 February 2024 (UTC)
]
:I agree with DrOrinScrivello on when to include the link and, looking at articles I created, I've put them both places. But maybe the infobox makes more sense if it is the original organization (like the church website) and the EL section makes sense if it's not the original purpose but a long-term occupant (like ]). This is just a thought; I don't think either location is "wrong". ] (]) 01:46, 20 February 2024 (UTC)
An editor has requested that ] be moved to ], which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You &#32;are invited to participate in ].<!-- from Template:RM notice--> - ] (]) 03:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)


== Good article reassessment for ] ==
== Individually listed non-contributing properties to historic districts? ==
] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 17:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)
Generally, when a building is ''non''-contributing to a historic district, we wouldn't care about it for this wikiproject. But I just created the article for the ], which was individually listed in 2016 when it turned 50 years old. The mentioned that it was within the ] but was listed as a non-contributing property because, at the time, it was only 31 years old. I expected to see that text followed with something like "and we're requesting it be added at this time" but it didn't.


== ] ==
The historic district does list 3717 Harney as non-contributing but doesn't say why. I looked for updates on the Gold Coast Historic District that reclassified the property, but didn't see any. (This wouldn't be an increase per se, since the building sits squarely within the original boundary.)


I have questions about this newly-added listing. As no documentation appears when I click the external link, and that's being used in lieu of a third-party source, it fails ] at present. ]/]/] 05:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)
Clearly, this is an obscure question, but is this really an individually listed non-contributing property to a historic district? - ] (]) 15:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
:From the list: {{indent|10}}{{main other|{{short description|none|2=noreplace}}}}''This ] list is complete through posted {{NRHP date for lists/dates|Alaska}}.''{{#tag:ref|National Park Service, ], , retrieved {{NRHP date for lists/dates{{!}}Alaska}}.}}
:In this case, it is in the . '']''] 18:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)


== Requested move at ] ==
:A property may be historic for one reason, and the district in which it sits may be historic for a different reason. Imagine a 19th-century town center that has a 1930s Art Deco building in it (perhaps the only such building in the entire community). Both notable, but the building does not contribute to the district's character. In your case, if the district is ever updated, the building's status might be changed to contributing. '']''] 22:39, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
]
::Thanks for the thoughtful reply! ] (]) 02:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
An editor has requested that ] be moved to ], which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You &#32;are invited to participate in ].<!-- from Template:RM notice--> - ] (]) 11:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)


== Help needed for infobox template with automatic category ==
I'm probably missing something obvious, but I was having trouble with updating infoboxes of individually listed contributing properties. For instance, the ] is an individually listed contributing property to the ] so the DP&L article should be in ].


But, when I update ] with the historic district, the infobox ''automatically'' places the article in the less specific ]. I then manually added the more specific category.


{{reflist-talk}}
How do I get the article to ''only'' be in the more specific category? - ] (]) 18:46, 27 May 2024 (UTC)


== Greater Nassau County NY lists ==
:I don't see a way to automatically place the article in a more specific category, but you can prevent the automatic placement in Category:Historic district contributing properties in STATE by adding a 'nocat=yes' parameter to the NRHP infobox template. You still have to manually add the more specific category, but at least that saves you from having to remove the other. ] (]) 13:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
::Ideally the template would have a value in addition to "CP", like "IL", that would do this automatically. But this approach is easy enough to cut and paste.{{pb}}Thank you! ] (]) 15:04, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
:Looking closer, there is an nrhp_type "indcp" but it automatically places the article in the ''national'' ] instead of the state one. So the same workaround is required. Adding this info to the ]. - ] (]) 14:39, 1 June 2024 (UTC)


Howdy, some rearranging has been done recently on different lists for Nassau County, NY. Two new sublists have been created: ], and ]. Can someone get these lists added into the Progress list, so the counts are back up to date? Thanks, ] (]) 16:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
== Requested move at ] ==
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span><sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 01:22, 18 June 2024 (UTC)


:I'll take care of it. '']''] 16:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
==] has been nominated for deletion==


== Requested move at ] ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>], which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the ] guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at ''']''' on the ] page.<!-- Template:Cfd-notify--> Thank you. ] (]) 02:51, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran ] 04:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 04:14, 4 January 2025

Shortcut
WikiProject National Register of Historic Places was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 28 September 2009.
WikiProject National Register of Historic Places was featured in a WikiProject Report in the Signpost on 17 October 2011.
This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject iconNational Register of Historic Places
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places
Archiving icon
Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40
41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50
51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60
61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70



This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

To-do:


Development
Images
Maintenance


Luther Palmer House / Pauchinganuc Farm

I can't find this NRHP property on Misplaced Pages. NRHP documents here. What am I missing? FloridaArmy (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Good catch. It's definitely on the NRHP. The reference number is 08000498 and the address is 812 Pendleton Hill Road. Some photos of the house can be found here. You can update National Register of Historic Places listings in New London County, Connecticut with the information if you'd like. APK hi :-) (talk) 04:30, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Brown's Hall-Thompson's Opera House#Requested move 15 December 2024

An editor has requested that Brown's Hall-Thompson's Opera House be moved to Thompson's Opera House, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. - RevelationDirect (talk) 03:34, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Good article reassessment for National Register of Historic Places

National Register of Historic Places has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Talk:National Register of Historic Places listings in Fairbanks North Star Borough, Alaska#Chena Building?

I have questions about this newly-added listing. As no documentation appears when I click the external link, and that's being used in lieu of a third-party source, it fails WP:V at present. RadioKAOS / Talk to me, Billy / Transmissions 05:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

From the list:
          This National Park Service list is complete through NPS recent listings posted January 3, 2025.
In this case, it is in the December 13 list. Magic♪piano 18:46, 21 December 2024 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Gem Theatre#Requested move 27 December 2024

An editor has requested that Gem Theatre be moved to Gem Theatre (Detroit), which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. - RevelationDirect (talk) 11:37, 31 December 2024 (UTC)


References

  1. National Park Service, United States Department of the Interior, "National Register of Historic Places: Weekly List Actions", retrieved January 3, 2025.

Greater Nassau County NY lists

Howdy, some rearranging has been done recently on different lists for Nassau County, NY. Two new sublists have been created: National Register of Historic Places listings in Long Beach, New York, and National Register of Historic Places listings in Glen Cove, New York. Can someone get these lists added into the Progress list, so the counts are back up to date? Thanks, 25or6to4 (talk) 16:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

I'll take care of it. Magic♪piano 16:48, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

Requested move at Talk:Gem Theatre#Requested move 27 December 2024

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Gem Theatre#Requested move 27 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. —usernamekiran (talk) 04:14, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

Categories: