| Revision as of 02:46, 4 January 2025 editSuper Dromaeosaurus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users57,715 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:46, 4 January 2025 edit undoSuper Dromaeosaurus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users57,715 editsNo edit summary | ||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| '''Energy blackmail''' is, as defined by the ] (DIIS), a strategic manipulation of ] resources for political or economic gain. It involves primarily ] and ], but also potentially other fuels such as ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.diis.dk/en/research/energy-as-a-weapon-decoding-blackmail-tactics-in-europe|title=Energy as a weapon - decoding blackmail tactics in Europe|first1=Veronika|last1=Slakaityte|first2=Izabela|last2=Surwillo|publisher=]|date=9 January 2024}}</ref> Energy blackmail has been widely attributed to ] in respect to its relationship with other states |
'''Energy blackmail''' is, as defined by the ] (DIIS), a strategic manipulation of ] resources for political or economic gain. It involves primarily ] and ], but also potentially other fuels such as ].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://www.diis.dk/en/research/energy-as-a-weapon-decoding-blackmail-tactics-in-europe|title=Energy as a weapon - decoding blackmail tactics in Europe|first1=Veronika|last1=Slakaityte|first2=Izabela|last2=Surwillo|publisher=]|date=9 January 2024}}</ref> Energy blackmail has been widely attributed to ] in respect to its relationship with other states and with the ] (EU).<ref>{{cite book|url=https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-981-97-2231-0|title=Global Political Economy, Geopolitics and International Security: The World in Permacrisis|editor-first1=Omprakash|editor-last1=Mishra|editor-first2=Souradeep|editor-last2=Sen|chapter-url=https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-2231-0_10|chapter=Leverage in Energy Security: Weaponising For Good and Bad|first=Cauvery|last=Ganapathy|publisher=]|page=176|year=2024|isbn=978-981-97-2230-3|doi=10.1007/978-981-97-2231-0|quote=Given that there is evidence now to suggest that by March 2021 (Kramer 2021), President Putin had made up his mind regarding the invasion of Ukraine in the coming spring, the decision by the Russians to reduce the supply of gas to Europe, could well account for a case of energy blackmail.}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=https://pism.pl/publications/how-the-war-in-ukraine-impacts-nato-policy-in-the-black-sea-region|title=How the War in Ukraine Impacts NATO Policy in the Black Sea Region|first=Filip|last=Bryjka|publisher=]|journal=PISM Bulletin|volume=57|issue=2176|date=12 May 2023|page=1|quote=Through hybrid methods, Russia is destabilising the internal situation in Moldova where it uses energy blackmail, disinformation, and financing of protests to undermine the pro-European Action and Solidarity Party (PAS) government and replace it with the pro-Russian Şor Party.}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4627566|title=Russia's invasion of Ukraine has cemented the European Union's commitment to carbon pricing|first=Jacob Funk|last=Kirkegaard|publisher=]|series=Policy Brief 23-13|date=30 September 2023|page=1|quote=Despite the energy shock of 2022, the price of EU carbon emissions permits was maintained in the €85 per ton range once Russia's energy blackmail became apparent in late 2021.}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine|url=http://turkishpolicy.com/files/articlepdf/hybrid-war-the-eastern-partnership-waiting-for-a-correlation_en_6878.pdf|title=Hybrid War & the Eastern Partnership: Waiting for a Correlation|first=Hanna|last=Shelest|magazine=]|volume=14|issue=3|date=13 December 2015|page=46|quote=This pressure in the form of trade wars, energy blackmail, discreditable propaganda, diplomatic deceit, and coercion to join alternative regional integration projects has been felt by almost all Eastern Partnership states (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine).}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=https://www.fpri.org/article/2024/10/contesting-russia-the-baltic-perspective/|title=Contesting Russia: The Baltic Perspective|first=Indra|last=Ekmanis|publisher=]|journal=Baltic Bulletin|series=Eurasia Program|date=28 October 2024|quote=The Baltic states, in turn, have responded by turning areas of risk into areas of expertise: for example, on Energy Security in Lithuania (2012), where previous dependency on Russia left the country vulnerable to energy blackmail;}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=https://www.foreignpolicyjournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/140606-Korybko-SouthStream.pdf|title=The Prospects for the South Stream Pipeline after the Ukrainian Crisis|first=Andrew|last=Korybko|journal=Foreign Policy Journal|date=6 June 2014}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal|url=https://www.cacianalyst.org/publications/analytical-articles/item/12793-russia-pressures-armenia-to-join-customs-union.html|title=Russia Pressures Armenia to Join Customs Union|first=Stephen|last=Blank|publisher=]|journal=The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst|date=27 August 2013|quote=Moscow's two abiding goals are to integrate the entire post-Soviet space under its domination and as part of that larger multi-dimensional process, ensure that it is the only security manager in the Caucasus. Not only is it now using energy blackmail against Armenia; }}</ref><ref>{{cite news|url=https://www.aa.com.tr/en/asia-pacific/eu-commission-chief-accuses-russia-of-energy-blackmail/3395695|title=EU Commission chief accuses Russia of energy 'blackmail'|first=Yasin|last=Güngör|newspaper=]|date=16 November 2024}}</ref> | ||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| {{Reflist|30em}} | {{Reflist|30em}} | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
| ] | ] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:46, 4 January 2025
Energy blackmail is, as defined by the Danish Institute for International Studies (DIIS), a strategic manipulation of energy resources for political or economic gain. It involves primarily oil and natural gas, but also potentially other fuels such as nuclear fuel. Energy blackmail has been widely attributed to Russia in respect to its relationship with other states and with the European Union (EU).
See also
References
- Slakaityte, Veronika; Surwillo, Izabela (9 January 2024). "Energy as a weapon - decoding blackmail tactics in Europe". Danish Institute for International Studies.
- Ganapathy, Cauvery (2024). "Leverage in Energy Security: Weaponising For Good and Bad". In Mishra, Omprakash; Sen, Souradeep (eds.). Global Political Economy, Geopolitics and International Security: The World in Permacrisis. Palgrave Macmillan. p. 176. doi:10.1007/978-981-97-2231-0. ISBN 978-981-97-2230-3.
Given that there is evidence now to suggest that by March 2021 (Kramer 2021), President Putin had made up his mind regarding the invasion of Ukraine in the coming spring, the decision by the Russians to reduce the supply of gas to Europe, could well account for a case of energy blackmail.
- Bryjka, Filip (12 May 2023). "How the War in Ukraine Impacts NATO Policy in the Black Sea Region". PISM Bulletin. 57 (2176). Polish Institute of International Affairs: 1.
Through hybrid methods, Russia is destabilising the internal situation in Moldova where it uses energy blackmail, disinformation, and financing of protests to undermine the pro-European Action and Solidarity Party (PAS) government and replace it with the pro-Russian Şor Party.
- Kirkegaard, Jacob Funk (30 September 2023). "Russia's invasion of Ukraine has cemented the European Union's commitment to carbon pricing". Policy Brief 23-13. Peterson Institute for International Economics. p. 1.
Despite the energy shock of 2022, the price of EU carbon emissions permits was maintained in the €85 per ton range once Russia's energy blackmail became apparent in late 2021.
- Shelest, Hanna (13 December 2015). "Hybrid War & the Eastern Partnership: Waiting for a Correlation" (PDF). Turkish Policy Quarterly. Vol. 14, no. 3. p. 46.
This pressure in the form of trade wars, energy blackmail, discreditable propaganda, diplomatic deceit, and coercion to join alternative regional integration projects has been felt by almost all Eastern Partnership states (Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Moldova, and Ukraine).
- Ekmanis, Indra (28 October 2024). "Contesting Russia: The Baltic Perspective". Baltic Bulletin. Eurasia Program. Foreign Policy Research Institute.
The Baltic states, in turn, have responded by turning areas of risk into areas of expertise: for example, on Energy Security in Lithuania (2012), where previous dependency on Russia left the country vulnerable to energy blackmail;
- Korybko, Andrew (6 June 2014). "The Prospects for the South Stream Pipeline after the Ukrainian Crisis" (PDF). Foreign Policy Journal.
- Blank, Stephen (27 August 2013). "Russia Pressures Armenia to Join Customs Union". The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute.
Moscow's two abiding goals are to integrate the entire post-Soviet space under its domination and as part of that larger multi-dimensional process, ensure that it is the only security manager in the Caucasus. Not only is it now using energy blackmail against Armenia;
- Güngör, Yasin (16 November 2024). "EU Commission chief accuses Russia of energy 'blackmail'". Anadolu Agency.
 | This article about energy, its collection, its distribution, or its uses is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |
 | This article about foreign relations is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it. |