| Revision as of 07:06, 16 January 2023 editNythar (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers142,750 edits Reverting edit(s) by Alfalfasprouts (talk) to rev. 1133750829 by Nigel Ish: non-constructive (RW 16.1)Tags: RW Undo← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:12, 4 January 2025 edit undoNJZombie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers30,607 edits Reverted 1 edit by MontanaBrice (talk)Tags: Twinkle Undo | ||
| (137 intermediate revisions by 38 users not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| == Vince == | == Vince == | ||
| Nice job adding to the "Legacy" section. The negatives were written objectively, no undue weight, and the two paragraphs didn't come off as smear pieces. Nice job. ] (]) 01:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC) | Nice job adding to the "Legacy" section. The negatives were written objectively, no undue weight, and the two paragraphs didn't come off as smear pieces. Nice job. ] (]) 01:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC) | ||
| == |
==Carlos Correa vandal== | ||
| Thanks for suggesting protecting ], which I have now done. When I wrote the talk page message saying "The article you have been vandalising has now been protected", I had seen only one article that had been affected, but later I realised there are more. It looks as though you probably know more about this vandal than I do, so if there are other affected articles that you can let me know about, I'll consider protecting those too. ] (]) 17:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I know they had been hitting ] at one point but that calmed down. However, they may resort to hitting that one again now that the others are blocked. ] (]) 18:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| In case you are not aware, ] has been started on ANI about you. (Note that it was originally posted on ] and then moved by another editor to ANI.) As neither the original poster or the person who moved the complaint to ANI appears to have notified you about this, I thought that it was senible to inform you of the discussion.] (]) 09:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :: Well, there has been continual vandalism at ] for years, so I think protecting it may be a good idea anyway. I have now checked all of the editing history of all the accounts I know of, and semi-protected all of the articles. Unfortunately, sometimes the effect of doing that is just to drive the vandal to other articles, but it's still worth trying. ] (]) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:12, 4 January 2025
You deserve this
even if you don't want it, just delete it then... :)
|
The Music Barnstar | |
| for all that good work on the Mucky Pup and other pages on which we've crossed paths... Luminifer (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC) |
Vince
Nice job adding to the "Legacy" section. The negatives were written objectively, no undue weight, and the two paragraphs didn't come off as smear pieces. Nice job. Kjscotte34 (talk) 01:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Carlos Correa vandal
Thanks for suggesting protecting List of people from Minnesota, which I have now done. When I wrote the talk page message saying "The article you have been vandalising has now been protected", I had seen only one article that had been affected, but later I realised there are more. It looks as though you probably know more about this vandal than I do, so if there are other affected articles that you can let me know about, I'll consider protecting those too. JBW (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I know they had been hitting Shannon Sharpe at one point but that calmed down. However, they may resort to hitting that one again now that the others are blocked. NJZombie (talk) 18:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Well, there has been continual vandalism at Shannon Sharpe for years, so I think protecting it may be a good idea anyway. I have now checked all of the editing history of all the accounts I know of, and semi-protected all of the articles. Unfortunately, sometimes the effect of doing that is just to drive the vandal to other articles, but it's still worth trying. JBW (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)