| Revision as of 00:45, 10 December 2023 editWoovee (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users14,210 edits →Santigold: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:12, 4 January 2025 edit undoNJZombie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers30,603 edits Reverted 1 edit by MontanaBrice (talk)Tags: Twinkle Undo | ||
| (79 intermediate revisions by 22 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| :Thanks. I know they had been hitting ] at one point but that calmed down. However, they may resort to hitting that one again now that the others are blocked. ] (]) 18:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | :Thanks. I know they had been hitting ] at one point but that calmed down. However, they may resort to hitting that one again now that the others are blocked. ] (]) 18:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
| :: Well, there has been continual vandalism at ] for years, so I think protecting it may be a good idea anyway. I have now checked all of the editing history of all the accounts I know of, and semi-protected all of the articles. Unfortunately, sometimes the effect of doing that is just to drive the vandal to other articles, but it's still worth trying. ] (]) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | :: Well, there has been continual vandalism at ] for years, so I think protecting it may be a good idea anyway. I have now checked all of the editing history of all the accounts I know of, and semi-protected all of the articles. Unfortunately, sometimes the effect of doing that is just to drive the vandal to other articles, but it's still worth trying. ] (]) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | ||
| ==Unblock request== | |||
| {{unblock reviewed |1=I seem to have been blocked as part of an IP range block. I’m a 17 year editor in good standing with not connection to the edits made by the targeted disruptive edits. Thanks ] (]) 12:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC) |decline = <!-- forgot ip -->Procedural decline only. You forgot to tell us your IP address so we can't investigate your claim. You can find this using . If you don't wish to provide this publicly, you may use ] to provide the IP address privately.<!-- Template:forgot ip--> ] (]) 13:14, 17 November 2023 (UTC)}} | |||
| :Sorry, the IP that seems to be blocked for me is 2600:1001:b04c:93a3:f125:6413:d565:e02a. ] (]) 13:47, 17 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::That block does not prevent you from editing, provided you are signed in to your account. --] (]) 13:50, 17 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :::Well, I’m signed in and unless I’m signed into a network, it’s not letting me edit via my phone. It’s saying I’ve been blocked. ] (]) 15:35, 17 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::::In that case, your phone is using a different IP address. For example, you may have the Apple iCloud private relay service turned on. You'll need to disable any such proxy or VPN and wait a full 24 hours. --] (]) 16:23, 17 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| : The range was hard blocked. I changed it, so you should be able to edit now. ] (]) 03:52, 18 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks for you help with that! MUCH appreciated!!! ] (]) 05:05, 18 November 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Santigold == | |||
| Withdrawing brackets for music genres, changing a few words in a quote whereas there wasn't any ] issue, is not what one could call a sign of collaborative work. Either one improves wording or one tries to locate new sources, but one certainly reverts an edit made by someone who did all the work in the lead of an article. ] (]) 00:45, 10 December 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:12, 4 January 2025
You deserve this
even if you don't want it, just delete it then... :)
|
The Music Barnstar | |
| for all that good work on the Mucky Pup and other pages on which we've crossed paths... Luminifer (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC) |
Vince
Nice job adding to the "Legacy" section. The negatives were written objectively, no undue weight, and the two paragraphs didn't come off as smear pieces. Nice job. Kjscotte34 (talk) 01:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Carlos Correa vandal
Thanks for suggesting protecting List of people from Minnesota, which I have now done. When I wrote the talk page message saying "The article you have been vandalising has now been protected", I had seen only one article that had been affected, but later I realised there are more. It looks as though you probably know more about this vandal than I do, so if there are other affected articles that you can let me know about, I'll consider protecting those too. JBW (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I know they had been hitting Shannon Sharpe at one point but that calmed down. However, they may resort to hitting that one again now that the others are blocked. NJZombie (talk) 18:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Well, there has been continual vandalism at Shannon Sharpe for years, so I think protecting it may be a good idea anyway. I have now checked all of the editing history of all the accounts I know of, and semi-protected all of the articles. Unfortunately, sometimes the effect of doing that is just to drive the vandal to other articles, but it's still worth trying. JBW (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)