| Revision as of 11:23, 8 March 2006 editKillerChihuahua (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users34,578 edits →Mucky Pup: Blocked for 3RR← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:12, 4 January 2025 edit undoNJZombie (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers30,603 edits Reverted 1 edit by MontanaBrice (talk)Tags: Twinkle Undo | ||
| (907 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==You deserve this== | |||
| even if you don't want it, just delete it then... :) | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid purple; background-color: beige;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Music Barnstar''' | |||
| ⚫ | |- | ||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid purple;" | for all that good work on the ] and other pages on which we've crossed paths... ] (]) 05:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Vince == | |||
| Nice job adding to the "Legacy" section. The negatives were written objectively, no undue weight, and the two paragraphs didn't come off as smear pieces. Nice job. ] (]) 01:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC) | |||
| ==Carlos Correa vandal== | |||
| Thanks for suggesting protecting ], which I have now done. When I wrote the talk page message saying "The article you have been vandalising has now been protected", I had seen only one article that had been affected, but later I realised there are more. It looks as though you probably know more about this vandal than I do, so if there are other affected articles that you can let me know about, I'll consider protecting those too. ] (]) 17:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Thanks. I know they had been hitting ] at one point but that calmed down. However, they may resort to hitting that one again now that the others are blocked. ] (]) 18:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Mucky Pup == | |||
| :: Well, there has been continual vandalism at ] for years, so I think protecting it may be a good idea anyway. I have now checked all of the editing history of all the accounts I know of, and semi-protected all of the articles. Unfortunately, sometimes the effect of doing that is just to drive the vandal to other articles, but it's still worth trying. ] (]) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC) | |||
| Having dropped in to see what was going on with this recently AfD'd article, I took a look at the article history, and I'd like to suggest that you take a break from editing this article for a couple of days. Let it be, find something else to work on, let the Wikistress levels die down. I know that you want to make Misplaced Pages a better encyclopedia, and I am certain that you will continue to do so. | |||
| I've left a similar suggestion to MikeWazowski, because I think it's a good idea for him to take a brief break, too. Not being much of a music fan, or Bloom County fan, I am just sort of looking at this from a distance, and I believe that a few days of benign neglect might improve perspectives all round. | |||
| -<font color="#2000C0">]</font> (<font color="#00FF00">]</font>) 07:31, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| *That's an understandable solution. My problem is the fact that he feels the need to be 100% right or not at all. While I haven't agreed with every deletion he's made, I've accepted most of them and moved on. In fact, I'm not even deleting his line, which I agree was a good point. I'm simply moving it to the appropriate section. Before the incident, he removed one my opening sentences, claiming redundancy. After thinking it over, I agreed with his deletion but realized the previous line was also redundant. This is the line that he's throwing a hissyfit over. As far as putting the line in, in order to make it interesting to people, if they're visiting the entry, they already had an interest, or found it interesting enough to follow a link from another entry. All a introduction, for a band, needs, is a lineup (original or current works), a formation year and the location a band came from. Unless there are some extraordinary events, that the band were resposible for or part of, there's no need for some minor accomplishment, like winning a writing contest for a cartoon strip. | |||
| He then removes a factual line about the first bass player, not being an official member, because there's no specific reference listed. Not every band entry is going to have a reference regarding the official status of each member that passes through. Most of the information, that I've supplied in the entry, comes from a mixture of information off of the band's site and my own personal knowledge resulting from my friendship with the members. | |||
| Lastly, the fact that a person may have suggested an entry, that I submitted, be undeleted, does not mean I'm going to just accept the person poor changes. | |||
| I just wanted to state my case and make my point. Thanks. | |||
| ] 02:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
| {| | |||
| ⚫ | |- | ||
| | valign="top" style="padding: 0.1em" | ] | |||
| | style="padding: 0.1em" | | |||
| '''You have been ]''' in accordance with ] for violating policy against 3RR on Mucky Pup. To contest this block, please reply here on your '''talk page''' by adding the text <nowiki>{{unblock}}</nowiki> along with the reason you believe the block is unjustified, or email the blocking administrator or any administrator from ].<br> | |||
| :''Note to ]:'' Unblocking yourself should almost ''never'' be done. If you disagree with the block, contact another administrator. | |||
| |} Please take this time to consider how to better handle content disputes. ]<sup>]</sup> 11:23, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:12, 4 January 2025
You deserve this
even if you don't want it, just delete it then... :)
|
The Music Barnstar | |
| for all that good work on the Mucky Pup and other pages on which we've crossed paths... Luminifer (talk) 05:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC) |
Vince
Nice job adding to the "Legacy" section. The negatives were written objectively, no undue weight, and the two paragraphs didn't come off as smear pieces. Nice job. Kjscotte34 (talk) 01:12, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Carlos Correa vandal
Thanks for suggesting protecting List of people from Minnesota, which I have now done. When I wrote the talk page message saying "The article you have been vandalising has now been protected", I had seen only one article that had been affected, but later I realised there are more. It looks as though you probably know more about this vandal than I do, so if there are other affected articles that you can let me know about, I'll consider protecting those too. JBW (talk) 17:43, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks. I know they had been hitting Shannon Sharpe at one point but that calmed down. However, they may resort to hitting that one again now that the others are blocked. NJZombie (talk) 18:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
- Well, there has been continual vandalism at Shannon Sharpe for years, so I think protecting it may be a good idea anyway. I have now checked all of the editing history of all the accounts I know of, and semi-protected all of the articles. Unfortunately, sometimes the effect of doing that is just to drive the vandal to other articles, but it's still worth trying. JBW (talk) 20:07, 4 May 2023 (UTC)