Misplaced Pages

American Revolutionary War: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:43, 13 August 2017 view sourceWOSlinker (talk | contribs)Administrators855,296 editsm fix image options← Previous edit Latest revision as of 19:54, 4 January 2025 view source Nikkimaria (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users232,359 edits rv: "Patriot" is the term typically used in source for that side of the conflictTag: Manual revert 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Short description|1775–1783 American war of independence from Great Britain}}
{{Redirect|Revolutionary War}}
{{About|military actions only|political and social developments, including the origins and aftermath of the war|American Revolution}} {{About|military actions primarily|origins and aftermath|American Revolution}}
{{pp-protected|expiry=indefinite)|small=yes}} {{Pp|expiry=indefinite|small=yes}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=June 2013}} {{Use American English|date=June 2019}}
{{Use mdy dates|date=March 2020}}
{{Infobox military conflict {{Infobox military conflict
|conflict=American Revolutionary War | conflict = American Revolutionary War
| partof = the ]
|image=AmericanRevolutionaryWarMon.jpg
| image = {{Multiple image
|image_size=300px
| perrow = 1/2/2
|caption='''Clockwise''': ] after the ], ], ] at the ], ], ]
| total_width = 300
|date=April 19, 1775{{snds}}September 3, 1783<ref name="was proclaimed by Congress">A ceasefire in America on April 11, 1783 in response to a ceasefire agreement between Great Britain and France on January 20, 1783. The final peace treaty was signed on September 3, 1783 and ratified in the U.S. on January 14, 1784, with final ratification exchanged in Europe on May 12, 1784. Hostilities in India continued until July 1783.</ref><br />{{small|({{Age in years, months and days|1775|04|19|1783|09|03}})}}<br />'''Ratification effective:''' May 12, 1784<br />{{small|({{Age in years, months and days|1775|04|19|1784|05|12}})}}
| border=infobox
|place= Eastern North America, ], ],<ref>{{cite book|last1=Jaques|first1=Tony|title=Dictionary of Battles and Sieges: F-O|date=2007|page=720|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Dh6jydKXikoC&pg=PA720|accessdate=1 April 2017}}</ref> ], ],<ref>Jaques (2007), </ref> ], the ], and the ]
| image1= Surrender of Lord Cornwallis.jpg

| image2= Battle of Guilford Courthouse 15 March 1781.jpg
|result= <!--DO NOT ALTER WITHOUT CONSENSUS-->
| image3= Battle of Trenton by Charles McBarron.jpg
'''American-Allied victory:'''
| image4= BattleofLongisland.jpg
* ]
| image5= The_Battle_of_Bunker's_Hill_June_17_1775_by_John_Trumbull.jpeg
* British recognition of American independence
| footer_align = left
* End of the ]
| footer = '''Clockwise from top left''': '']'' after the ], ], ] at the ], ], and the ]
* British retention of Canada and Gibraltar
}}
|territory=
| image_size =
* ] cedes to the ] the area east of the ] and south of the ] and ]
| date = April 19, 1775{{snds}}September 3, 1783{{Efn|A cease-fire in North America was proclaimed by Congress<ref>{{cite web | url=http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/proc1783.asp | title=Avalon Project - British-American Diplomcay : Proclamation Declaring the Cesssation of Arms; April 11, 1783 }}</ref> on April 11, 1783, under a cease-fire agreement between Great Britain and France on January 20, 1783. The final peace treaty was signed on September 3, 1783, and ratified on January 14, 1784, in the U.S., with final ratification exchanged in Europe on May 12, 1784. Hostilities in India continued until July 1783.}}<br />({{Age in years, months and days|1775|04|19|1783|09|03}})<br />Ratification effective: May 12, 1784
* Great Britain cedes ], ], and ] to ]
| place = ], ], the ]
* Great Britain cedes ] and ] to ]
| result = <!--DO NOT ALTER WITHOUT CONSENSUS -->
* ] cedes ] to Great Britain
American and allied victory

* Signing of the ] in 1776.
|combatant1= <!--DO NOT CHANGE WITHOUT CONSENSUS-->
* ] would not recognize American independence until signing the ].
{{flagicon|United States|1776}} ''']'''<br />{{small|(before 1776)}}<br />
* End of the ]<ref name="4I7tG">], pp. 615–618</ref>
{{flagicon|United States|1777}} ''']'''<br />{{small|(after 1776)}}<br />
| territory = Great Britain cedes generally, all mainland territories east of the ], south of the ], and north of ] to the ].
{{flagicon image|Flag of the Vermont Republic.svg}} ]{{refn|(from 1777)}}<br />
* Great Britain cedes ] and ] to ].
{{flagicon|Kingdom of France}} ]{{refn|]}}{{refn|The term "French Empire" colloquially refers to the ], but it is used here for brevity to refer to France proper and to the colonial empire that the ] ruled}}<br>
* Great Britain cedes ], ] and ] to ].
{{flagicon|Spanish Empire}} ]{{refn|]}}
<!--PLEASE DO NOT CHANGE WITHOUT CONSENSUS-->| combatant1 = ''']:'''<br>{{flagcountry|Thirteen Colonies}} (1775)<br>{{Flagdeco|Thirteen Colonies}}{{Flagdeco|United States|1776}} ] (1775–1776)<br>{{Unbulleted list
----
|{{Flagdeco|United States|1776}}{{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ] (from 1776){{efn|Including the United Colonies period from 1776 to 1781 and the ] from 1781 to 1783.}}
''Co-belligerents:''
{{Collapsible list|bullets=on

|]|]|]|]|]|]|]|]|]|]|]|]|]}}<br>{{Flagcountry|Kingdom of France}}
{{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ]{{refn|]}}<br />
<br>{{flagdeco|Kingdom of Spain|1760}} ]<br>{{Flagcountry|Dutch Republic}}
{{Flagicon image|Flag of Mysore.svg}} ]{{refn|(])}}
----
{{Collapsible list
|framestyle=border:none; padding:0; <!--Hides borders and improves row spacing-->
|title=]:
|1= ]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]{{refn|(until 1779)}}<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]
}} }}
| combatant1a =
|combatant2= <!--DO NOT CHANGE WITHOUT CONSENSUS-->
'''Combatants'''
{{flagicon|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]<br>
{{Unbulleted list
{{flagicon image|Flag of Hanover (1692).svg}} ]{{refn|Hanover supplied troops per ] treaty, not as mercenaries}}<ref>Lowell, Edward J (1884), "The Hessians and the other German Auxiliaries of Great Britain in the Revolutionary War", Harper and Brothers Publishers, New York, Chapter II. Quote: "Five battalions of the Hanoverian subjects of George III were despatched to Gibraltar and Minorca"</ref> <!--Agreed by consensus, do not revert-->
|] Br. Canadien, Cong. rgts.{{Efn|Two independent "COR" Regiments, the Congress's Own Regiments, were recruited among British Canadiens. The ] formed by ] of ];<ref name="h5WNR">]</ref> and the ] formed by ] of ], Quebec.<ref name="kRctn">]</ref>}}
|] Br. Canadien mil., Fr. led{{Efn|] independently ] under a ] with British Canadien militia recruited from western Quebec (]) at the county seat of ], ], and ].<ref name="kbqqr">]</ref>}}}}
{{Collapsible list<!-- removed for consistency, until this works correctly when nested: |bullets=on -->
|titlestyle=background:transparent;text-align:left;font-weight:normal;font-size:100%;
|framestyle=border:none; padding:0; <!--Hides borders and improves row spacing-->
|title=]<ref name="bell">], Essay</ref>
|]|]|]|]|]|]|]|]{{Efn|(until 1779)}}|]|]|]|]<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://allthingsliberty.com/2015/02/indian-patriots-from-eastern-massachusetts-six-perspectives/|title=Indian Patriots from Eastern Massachusetts: Six Perspectives|first=Daniel J.|last=Tortora|date=February 4, 2015|website=Journal of the American Revolution}}</ref>}}
<!--DO NOT CHANGE WITHOUT CONSENSUS-->| combatant2 = {{Flagcountry|Kingdom of Great Britain}}
*]<!--Agreed by consensus, do not revert-->
*]
*]
*]
*]
| combatant2a = '''Combatants'''<br>{{Unbulleted list
|{{Collapsible list|bullets=on
|titlestyle=background:transparent;text-align:left;font-weight:normal;font-size:100%;
|title={{flagicon|Hesse}}{{Efn|Sixty-five percent of Britain's German auxiliaries employed in North America were from ] (16,000) and ] (2,422), flying this same flag.<ref>], p. 66</ref>}} {{flagicon|Brunswick|pre1814}}{{Efn|Twenty percent of Britain's German auxiliaries employed in North America were from ] (5,723),<ref>], p. 66</ref> flying this flag.<ref>{{cite web |title=Duchy of Brunswick until 1918 (Germany) |url=https://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/de-bs814.html |website=www.crwflags.com |publisher=] |access-date=5 February 2024}}</ref>}} ]<ref name="atwood1,23">], pp. 1, 23</ref>{{Efn|The British hired over 30,000 professional soldiers from various German states who served in North America from 1775 to 1782.<ref>], pp. 14–15</ref> Commentators and historians often refer to them as mercenaries or auxiliaries, terms that are sometimes used interchangeably.<ref name="atwood1,23" />}}<!--There was a consensus to use both terms, per neutrality.-->
|] ]|] ]|] ]<!--black, yellow and red colors not officially used by the military until 1814: see https://www.fotw.info/flags/de-wp_hi.html-->|] ]|] ]|] ] |{{Flagcountry|Electorate of Hanover}}
}}
{{Collapsible list|bullets=on
|titlestyle=background:transparent;text-align:left;font-weight:normal;font-size:100%;
|title=]<ref name="bell" />
|]|]
|]|]|]{{Efn|(from 1779)}}|]|]|]|]|]}}
}}
| commander1 = <!--MAJOR LEADERS ONLY. DO NOT ADD/REMOVE WITHOUT CONSENSUS -->{{Unbulleted list
|{{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ]
|{{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ]|{{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ]}}
---- ----
{{Unbulleted list|{{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ]|{{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ]|{{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ]|{{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ]|{{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ]|{{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ]{{Turncoat}}{{Efn|Arnold served on the American side from 1775 to 1780; after defecting, he served on the British side from 1780 to 1783.}}|{{flagicon image |George Rogers Clark Flag.svg}} ]| {{Flagdeco|Kingdom of France}} {{Flagdeco|United States|1777}} ]|{{Flagdeco|Kingdom of France}} ]|{{Flagdeco|Spain|1748}} ]|]}}
]:<!--Consensus agrees mercenaries is the term, do not revert--><br />
| commander2 = <!--MAJOR LEADERS ONLY. DO NOT ADD/REMOVE WITHOUT CONSENSUS-->{{Unbulleted list
] ]<br />
|{{flagdeco|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]|{{Flagicon|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]|{{Flagicon|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]}}
] ]<br />
] ]<!--black, yellow and red colors not officially used by the military until 1814: see http://www.fotw.net/flags/de-wp_hi.html--><br />
] ]<br />
] ]<br />
] ]
---- ----
{{Unbulleted list|{{Flagicon|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]|{{Flagdeco|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]|{{Flagdeco|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]|{{Flagdeco|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]|{{Flagdeco|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]|{{Flagdeco|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]|{{Flagdeco|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]{{Efn|1780–1783}}|{{Flagdeco|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]|{{Flagdeco|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]|]}}
{{Collapsible list
| strength1 = {{Unbulleted list
|framestyle=border:none; padding:0; <!--Hides borders and improves row spacing-->
|title=]: |'''United States:'''{{Bulleted list
|] and ]:{{Bulleted list|40,000 (average)<ref name="duncan371">], p. 371</ref>{{Efn|The total in active duty service for the American Cause during the American Revolutionary War numbered 200,000.<ref name="6bqxv">], pp. 195–196</ref>}}}}
|1= ]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]{{refn|(from 1779)}}<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]<br />]
|]:{{Bulleted list|53 ] and ]<ref name="Greene" />{{Efn|5,000 sailors (peak),<ref name="Greene">], p. 328</ref> manning privateers, an additional 55,000 total sailors<ref name="usmm">], "Privateers and Mariners"</ref>}}}}
|]: 2,131 (peak)<ref>]</ref>
|''']:'''{{Bulleted list|106 ships (total)<ref>], pp. 315–316</ref>}}}}
|'''France:'''{{Bulleted list
|]: 10,800{{Efn|In 1780, General ] landed in Rhode Island with an independent command of about 6000 troops,<ref>]</ref> and in 1781 Admiral ] landed nearly 4000 troops who were detached to Lafayette's Continental Army surrounding British General ] in Virginia at ].<ref>]</ref> An additional 750 French troops participated with the Spanish assault on ].<ref name="beerman181">]</ref>}}
|]: <small>2 fleets;</small>{{efn|For five months in 1778 from July to November, the French deployed a fleet to assist American operations off of New York, ] and ] commanded by Admiral ], with little result.<ref>]</ref> In September 1781, Admiral ] left the West Indies to defeat the British fleet off Virginia at the ], then offloaded 3,000 troops and siege cannon to support Washington's ].<ref name="miTsf">]</ref>}} <small>escorts</small><ref name="dull110">], p. 110</ref>}}
| '''Spain:'''
|]: 12,000{{efn|Governor ] deployed 500 Spanish regulars in his New Orleans-based attacks on British-held locations west of the Mississippi River in ].<ref>]</ref> In later engagements, Galvez had 800 regulars from New Orleans to assault ], reinforced by infantry from regiments of Jose de Ezpeleta from Havana. In the assault on Pensacola, the Spanish Army contingents from Havana exceeded 9,000.<ref>]</ref> For the final days of the siege at Pensacola siege, Admiral Jose Solano's fleet landed 1,600 crack infantry veterans from that of ].<ref name="beerman181" />}}
|]: 1 fleet;{{efn|Admiral Jose Solano's fleet arrived from the Mediterranean Sea to support the Spanish conquest of English Pensacola, West Florida.<ref name="beerman181" />}} escorts
|'''Native Americans:''' Unknown
}} }}
| strength2 = {{Unbulleted list
|commander1=<!--MAJOR LEADERS ONLY. DO NOT ADD/REMOVE WITHOUT CONSENSUS-->
|'''Great Britain:'''{{Bulleted list
{{flagicon|United States|1777}} ]<br>
|]:{{Bulleted list
{{flagicon image|Flag of the Vermont Republic.svg}} ]<br>
|48,000 (average), most in North America{{Efn|British 121,000 (global 1781)<ref>], "British Army 1775–1783"</ref> "Of 7,500 men in the Gibraltar garrison in September (including 400 in hospital), some 3,430 were always on duty".<ref>], p. 63</ref>}}}}
{{flagicon|Kingdom of France}} ]<br>
|]:{{Bulleted list
{{flagicon|Spanish Empire}} ]<br>
|Task-force fleets & blockading squadrons{{Efn|Royal Navy 94 ] global, 104 ] global,<ref name="winfield">]</ref> 37 ] global,<ref name="winfield" />
----
171,000 sailors<ref name="macksey6,176">]&nbsp;, pp. 6, 176</ref>}}}}}}
{{flagicon|Dutch Republic}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Kingdom of Mysore}} ] ]<br />{{flagicon|Kingdom of Mysore}} ]
]
|commander2=<!--MAJOR LEADERS ONLY. DO NOT ADD/REMOVE WITHOUT CONSENSUS-->


|''']:'''{{Bulleted list
{{flagicon|Kingdom of Great Britain}}{{flagicon image|Flag of Hanover (1692).svg}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]<br>{{flagicon|Kingdom of Great Britain}} ]
|25,000 (total)<ref name="savas41">], p. xli</ref>{{Efn|Contains a detailed listing of American, French, British, German, and Loyalist regiments; indicates when they were raised, the main battles, and what happened to them. Also includes the main warships on both sides, and all the important battles.}}}}

|''']:'''{{Bulleted list |29,875 (total)<ref name="Knesebeck">]&nbsp;, p. 9</ref>}}
]
|'''Native Americans:'''{{Bulleted list|13,000<ref name="Greene p. 393" />}}}}
|strength1=
| casualties1 = {{Unbulleted list
'''United States:'''<br />
<small>'''] & ]:'''<br /> |'''United States:'''{{Bulleted list
|178,800–223,800 total dead
40,000 (average)<ref name=medical>Duncan, Louis C. (1931).</ref><br />
|6,800 killed
200,000 (total served)<ref name="Michael Lanning 2009 195–96">{{cite book|author=Michael Lanning|title=American Revolution 100: The Battles, People, and Events of the American War for Independence, Ranked by Their Significance|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1GEs53wMr7EC&pg=PA193|year=2009|publisher=Sourcebooks|pages=195–96}}</ref><br />
|6,100 wounded
''']:'''<br />
5,000 sailors (peak 1779)<ref name="Greene" /><br /> |17,000 dead from disease<ref name="oLlYw">], "Patriots or Terrorists"</ref>
|25,000–70,000 war dead<ref name="FFKG4">]</ref>
53 ] and ] (total served)<ref name="Greene">Jack P. Greene and J. R. Pole. ''A Companion to the American Revolution'' (Wiley-Blackwell, 2003), p. 328.</ref><br />
|130,000 dead from smallpox<ref name="2D11O">], pp. 133–134</ref>}}
''']:'''<br />
|'''France:'''{{Bulleted list
106 ships (total served)<ref>{{cite book|title=The navy of the American Revolution: its administration, its policy and its achievements|first=Charles Oscar|last=Paullin|publisher=The Burrows Brothers Co|year=1906|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ws5EAAAAIAAJ&dq=inauthor%3Apaullin%20massachusetts%20navy&lr=&pg=PA315#v=onepage&q=inauthor:paullin%20massachusetts%20navy&f=false|ref=Paullin}}</ref><br />
|2,112 killed– <small>East Coast</small><ref name="ApKKb">], pp. 20, 53</ref>{{Efn|1=Beyond the 2112 deaths recorded by the French Government fighting for U.S. independence, additional men died fighting Britain in a war waged by France, Spain, and the Dutch Republic from 1778 to 1784, "overseas" from the American Revolution as posited by a British scholar{{specify|date=July 2022}} in his "War of the American Revolution".<ref name="yt8Dp">], pp. 75, 135</ref>}}}}
''']:'''<br />
|'''Spain:'''{{Bulleted list
55,000 sailors (total served)<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usmm.org/revolution.html |title=Privateers or Merchant Mariners help win the Revolutionary War |publisher=Usmm.org |date= |accessdate=May 25, 2017}}</ref><br />
1,697 ships<ref>Howarth 1991, p. 16</ref></small> |371 killed – W. Florida<ref name="gZqKm">], p. 16</ref>
|4,000 dead – prisoners<ref name="QEJS2">], p. 69</ref>}}

'''Allies:'''<br /> |'''Native Americans:''' Unknown
}}
<small>'''Army:'''<br />
| casualties2 = {{Unbulleted list
63,000 French and Spanish (Gibraltar){{Sfn | Montero | 1860 | p = 356}}{{Sfn | Chartrand | Courcelle | 2006 | p = 79}}<br />
'''Navy:'''<br /> |'''Great Britain:'''{{Bulleted list
|8,500 killed<ref name="3kb8Q">], p. 134</ref>{{Efn|Clodfelter reports that the total deaths among the British and their allies numbered 15,000 killed in battle or died of wounds. These included estimates of 3000 Germans, 3000 Loyalists and Canadians, 3000 lost at sea, and 500 Native Americans killed in battle or died of wounds.<ref name="2D11O" />}}}}
146 ] (1782)<ref name="Jonathan Dull 1985 p. 110">Jonathan Dull, ''A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution'' (Yale University Press, 1985), p. 110.</ref></small>
|'''Germans:'''{{Bulleted list

|7,774 total dead
'''Native American Allies:''' <br />
|1,800 killed
<small>Unknown</small>
|4,888 deserted<ref name="duncan371" />}}

|''']:'''{{Bulleted list
|strength2=
|7,000 total dead
'''Great Britain:'''<br />
|1,700 killed
<small>''']:'''<br />
|5,300 dead from disease<ref name="SlCBl">], ''Forgotten Patriots''</ref>}}
48,000 (America peak)<ref name="totallyhistory.com">{{cite web|url=http://totallyhistory.com/red-coats/|title=Red Coats Facts – British Soldiers in the American Revolution|work=totallyhistory.com}}</ref><br />
|'''Native Americans'''{{Bulleted list
121,000 (global 1781)<ref name="British Army 1775–1783">{{cite web|url=http://orbat.com/site/uk_orbats/files/6/The%20British%20Army%201775.pdf |title=The British Army 1775–1783 |publisher=orbat|accessdate=2013-09-23}}</ref><br />
|500 total dead<ref name="2D11O" />}}
7,500 (Gibraltar){{Sfn | Chartrand | Courcelle | 2006 | p = 63 | ps =: "Of 7,500 men in the Gibraltar garrison in September (including 400 in hospital), some 3,430 were always on duty"}}<br />
}}
''']:'''<br />
| campaignbox = {{Campaignbox American Revolutionary War}}
94 ] (1782)<ref name="Jonathan Dull 1985 p. 110" /><br />
104 ] (1781)<ref>Winfield, Rif, '']: 1714–1792'' (Seaforth Publishing, 2007) {{ISBN|978-1-84415-700-6}}</ref><br />
37 ] (1781)<ref>Winfield, Rif, ''] 1714–1792: Design, Construction, Careers and Fates'' (Seaforth Publishing, 2007)</ref><br />
171,000 sailors<ref name="Mackesy 1964 pp. 6, 176">Mackesy (1964), pp. 6, 176 (British seamen).</ref></small>

''']:'''<br />
<small>25,000 (total served)<ref name="Savas and Dameron 2006, p. xli">Savas and Dameron (2006), p. xli</ref></small>

''']:'''<br />
<small>2,365 (total served)<ref>Knesebeck, Ernst von dem (1845), "Geschichte de churhannoverschen Truppen in Gibraltar, Minorca und Ostindien", Published by Im Verlage der Helwingschen Hof-Buchhandlung. Note: The strength of a Hanoverian battalion is listed as 473 men</ref></small>

''']:'''<br />
<small>29,875 (total served)<ref name="Lowell, Edward J 1884">Lowell, Edward J (1884), "The Hessians and the other German Auxiliaries of Great Britain in the Revolutionary War", Harper and Brothers Publishers, New York, Chapter II</ref></small>

'''Native American Allies:'''<br />
<small>13,000<ref>Greene and Pole (1999), p. 393; Boatner (1974), p. 545.</ref></small>

|casualties1= '''United States:'''<br />
<small>25,000–70,000 total dead<ref name=medical /><ref name="Howard H. Peckham 1974">Howard H. Peckham, ed., The Toll of Independence: Engagements and Battle Casualties of the American Revolution (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1974).</ref><br />
6,800 killed in battle<br />
17,000 died of disease<ref name="Burrows">{{cite journal|last=Burrows |first=Edwin G. |author-link=Edwin G. Burrows |title=Patriots or Terrorists |url=http://www.americanheritage.com/content/patriots-or-terrorists |work=American Heritage |accessdate=November 29, 2014 |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20130323233806/http://www.americanheritage.com/content/patriots-or-terrorists |archivedate=March 23, 2013 |date=Fall 2008 |series=58 |issue=5 |deadurl=no |df=mdy }}</ref><br /></small>

'''France:'''<br />
<small>at least 7,000 dead<br />
(2,112 in the United States)<ref name="frenchcasualtiesrevolution">{{cite web|last1=Dawson|first1=Warrington|title=The 2112 Frenchmen who died in the United States from 1777 to 1783 while fighting for the American Independence|url=http://www.w3r-us.org/history/rosters/frgraves.htm|website=Washington-Rochambeau Revolutionary Route|publisher=Journal de la societe des Americanistes|accessdate=4 June 2017}}</ref><br /></small>

'''Spain:'''<br /><small>5,000 killed<ref name="Necrometrics">{{cite web|url= http://necrometrics.com/wars18c.htm#AmRev |title= Spanish casualties in The American Revolutionary war. |publisher= Necrometrics}}</ref>

'''Netherlands:'''<br />
<small>500 killed<ref name="Necrometrics">{{cite web|url= http://necrometrics.com/wars18c.htm#AmRev |title= Spanish casualties in The American Revolutionary war. |publisher= Necrometrics}}</ref></small>
----
'''Total:''' 37,000–82,500+ soldiers dead
|casualties2='''Great Britain:'''<br />
<small>'''Army:'''<br />
43,633 total dead<ref name="Annual Register, 1783"> (1785), pp. 199–200.</ref><br />
~9,372 killed in battle<ref name="books.google.com"> (1781), pp. 263–65.</ref><br />
27,000 died of disease<ref name=medical /><ref>{{cite web|url= http://necrometrics.com/wars18c.htm|title= Eighteenth Century Death Tolls|author= |date= |work= necrometrics.com|accessdate= January 7, 2016}}</ref><br />
'''Navy:'''<br />
1,243 killed in battle<br />
18,500 died of disease (1776–1780)<ref name="Parliamentary Register"> (1781), p. 269.</ref><br />
42,000 deserted<ref name="Mackesy pp. 6, 176">Mackesy (1964), pp. 6, 176 (British seamen)</ref><br /></small>

'''Germans:'''<br />
<small>7,774 total dead<br />
1,800 killed in battle<br />
4,888 deserted<ref name=medical /></small>

'''Loyalists:'''<br />
<small>5,300 total dead<br />
1,700 killed in battle<br />
3,600 died of disease (estimated)<ref>Burrows, Edwin. "Forgotten Patriots: The Untold Story of American Prisoners During the Revolutionary War." Basic Books. New York, 2008. Page 203.</ref></small>
----
'''Total:''' 76,500+ soldiers dead
| campaignbox =
{{Campaignbox American Revolutionary War}}
}} }}
<!--
<!--DO NOT MAKE ANY MAJOR EDITS TO THE LEAD, IT WAS AGREED UPON BY CONSENSUS ON THE TALK PAGE. PLEASE DISCUSS IF YOU WISH TO CHANGE IT-->
Please do not make any major edits to the lead, as it was agreed upon by consensus on the talk page. Please discuss if you wish to change it.
The '''American Revolutionary War''' (1775{{ndash}}1783), also known as the '''American War of Independence''',<ref>Modern British writers generally favor "American War of Independence", rather than "American Rebellion" or "War of American Independence". {{cite web|url= https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-curriculum-in-england-history-programmes-of-study/national-curriculum-in-england-history-programmes-of-study|title= National Curriculum England|date= |accessdate= April 21, 2016}}</ref> was a global war that began as a conflict between ] and her ] which declared independence as the ].{{refn|This article primarily refers to the inhabitants of the thirteen colonies who supported the American Revolution as "Americans", with occasional references to "Patriots" or "Revolutionaries". Colonists who supported the British and opposed the Revolution are referred to as "Loyalists" or "Tories". The geographical area of the thirteen colonies is often referred to simply as "America".|group=N}}
-->


The '''American Revolutionary War''' (April 19, 1775 – September 3, 1783), also known as the '''Revolutionary War''' or '''American War of Independence''', was an armed conflict that was part of the broader ], in which American ] forces organized as the ] and commanded by ] defeated the ]. The conflict was fought in ], the ], and the ]. The war ended with the ], which resulted in ] ultimately recognizing the independence of the ].
After 1765, growing ] strained the relationship between Britain and its colonies. Following the ], ] protests against ] escalated into boycotts, which culminated in the ] ] in Boston Harbor. Britain responded by closing Boston Harbor and passing a series of ] against Massachusetts colony. ] responded with the ], and they established a shadow government which wrested control of the countryside from the Crown. Twelve colonies formed a ] to coordinate their resistance, establishing committees and conventions that effectively seized power.<ref>The colony of Georgia joined later.</ref>


After the ] gained dominance in North America with victory over the French in the ] in 1763, tensions and disputes arose between Great Britain and the ] over a variety of issues, including the ] and ]. The resulting British military occupation led to the ] in 1770. Among further tensions, the British Parliament imposed the ] in mid-1774. A British attempt to disarm the Americans and the resulting ] in April 1775 ignited the war. In June, the ] formalized Patriot militias into the ] and appointed Washington its commander-in-chief. The British Parliament declared the colonies to be in a ] in August 1775. The stakes of the war were formalized with passage of the ] by the Congress in ] on July 2, 1776, and the unanimous ratification of the ] on July 4, 1776.
British attempts to disarm the Massachusetts militia at ] in April 1775 ]. Militia forces then ], forcing a British evacuation in March 1776, and Congress appointed ] to command the ]. Concurrently, an American attempt to ] against the British ]. On July 2, 1776, the Continental Congress voted for independence, issuing its ] on July&nbsp;4. ] launched a ], capturing New York City and leaving American morale at a low ebb. However, victories at ] and ] restored American confidence. In 1777, the British launched an ] under ], intending to isolate ]. Instead of assisting this effort, Howe took his army on a separate ] against Philadelphia, and Burgoyne was decisively defeated at ] in October 1777.


After a ], Washington's forces drove the ] out of Boston in March 1776, and British commander in chief ] responded by launching the ]. Howe captured New York City in November. Washington responded by ] the ] and winning small but significant victories at ] and ]. In the summer of 1777, as Howe was poised to ], the Continental Congress fled to ]. In October 1777, a separate northern British force under the command of ] was forced to surrender at ] in an American victory that proved crucial in convincing France and Spain that an independent United States was a viable possibility. France signed a ] with the rebels, followed by a ] in February 1778. In 1779, the ] undertook a ] campaign against the Iroquois who were largely allied with the British. Indian raids on the American frontier, however, continued to be a problem. Also, in 1779, Spain allied with France against Great Britain in the ], though Spain did not formally ally with the Americans.
Burgoyne's defeat had drastic consequences; France formally ] and ] in 1778, and Spain ] the following year as an ] but not as an ally of the United States. In 1780, the ] ], and tensions between Britain and the Netherlands erupted into ]. In North America, the British mounted a "]" led by ] which hinged upon a ], but too few came forward. Cornwallis suffered reversals at ] and ]. He retreated to Yorktown, Virginia, intending an evacuation, but a decisive ] deprived him of an escape. A Franco-American army led by the ] and Washington then ] and, with no sign of relief, he surrendered.


Howe's replacement ] intended to take the war against the Americans into the ]. Despite some initial success, British General ] was besieged by a Franco-American force in ] in September and October 1781. Cornwallis was forced to surrender in October. The British wars with France and Spain continued for another two years, but fighting largely ceased in North America. In the Treaty of Paris, ratified on September 3, 1783, Great Britain acknowledged the sovereignty and independence of the United States, bringing the American Revolutionary War to an end. The ] resolved Great Britain's conflicts with ] and ] and forced Great Britain to cede ], ], and small territories in ] to France, and ], ] and ] to Spain.<ref>Lawrence S. Kaplan, "The Treaty of Paris, 1783: A Historiographical Challenge", ''International History Review,'' Sept 1983, Vol. 5 Issue 3, pp 431–442</ref><ref name="9w1sv">], "American Revolution"</ref>
] in Britain had long opposed the pro-war ] in Parliament, and the surrender gave them the upper hand. In early 1782, Parliament voted to end all offensive operations in North America, but the war continued in Europe and India. Britain remained ] but scored a ] over the French navy. On September 3, 1783, the belligerent parties signed the ] in which Britain agreed to recognize the sovereignty of the United States and formally end the war. French involvement had proven decisive,<ref name="RichardBrooks">Brooks, Richard (editor). ''Atlas of World Military History''. HarperCollins, 2000, p. 101 "Washington's success in keeping the army together deprived the British of victory, but French intervention won the war."</ref> but France made few gains and incurred crippling debts. Spain made some minor territorial gains but failed in its primary aim of recovering ]. The Dutch were defeated on all counts and were compelled to cede ] to Great Britain. In India, the war against Mysore and its allies ] ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/status%20quo%20ante%20bellum|title=status quo ante bellum|publisher=''Merriam-Webster Online''|accessdate=June 24, 2017}}</ref>


== Background == ==Prelude to war==
{{Main|American Revolution}} {{Main|American Revolution}}
{{Further|American Enlightenment|Colonial history of the United States|Thirteen Colonies}}
] and ] following the ] with lands held by the British prior to 1763 (in red), land gained by Britain in 1763 (in pink), and lands ceded to the ] in secret during 1762 (in light yellow).]]


The French and Indian War, part of the wider global conflict known as the ], ended with the ], which expelled ] from their possessions in ].<ref name="wtW8l">], p. 4</ref> The ] was designed to refocus colonial expansion north into ] and south into ], with the ] as the dividing line between British and ] possessions in America. Settlement was tightly restricted beyond the 1763 limits, and claims west of this line, including by ] and ], were rescinded.{{Sfn|Lass|1980|p=3}} With the exception of Virginia and others deprived of rights to western lands, the ] agreed on the boundaries but disagreed on where to set them. Many settlers resented the restrictions entirely, and enforcement required permanent garrisons along the frontier, which led to increasingly bitter disputes over who should pay for them.<ref name="pb2Zp">], p. 12</ref>
=== Early seeds ===


===Taxation and legislation===
In 1651, the ] sought to regulate trade in America by passing the ], ensuring that trade ].<ref>Pestana, Carla Gardina (2004). The English Atlantic in an Age of Revolution: 1640–1661. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London, England: Harvard University Press. p. 120.</ref><ref name="Purvis1997">{{cite book|last=Purvis|first=Thomas L.|title=A dictionary of American history|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=556-YcjJYhkC&pg=PA278|accessdate=24 May 2017|date=23 April 1997|publisher=Wiley-Blackwell|isbn=978-1-57718-099-9|page=278}}</ref> The economic effects were minimal,<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Whaples|first=Robert|author-link=Robert Whaples|journal=]|publisher=]|volume=55|issue=1|pages=140|jstor=2123771|title=Where Is There Consensus Among American Economic Historians? The Results of a Survey on Forty Propositions|year=March 1995|via=]|registration=y|doi=10.1017/S0022050700040602}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal |last=Thomas |first=Robert P. |title=A Quantitative Approach to the Study of the Effects of British Imperial Policy of Colonial Welfare: Some Preliminary Findings |journal=] |year=1964 |volume=25 |issue=4 |pages=615–638 |jstor=2116133 }}</ref> but they triggered serious political friction.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Walton |first=Gary M. |title=The New Economic History and the Burdens of the Navigation Acts |journal=] |year=1971 |volume=24 |issue=4 |pages=533–542 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-0289.1971.tb00192.x }}</ref> The American colonists had fought ] without significant assistance from the Crown, and this contributed to a growing sense of American identity separate from that of ].<ref>Lepore (1998), ''The Name of War'' (1999) pp 5–7</ref> Britain continued to assert control into the 1680s,<ref>Curtis P. Nettels, The Roots of American Civilization: A History of American Colonial Life (1938) p. 297.</ref> culminating in the abrogation of colonial charters<ref>{{cite book|last=Lovejoy|first=David|title=The Glorious Revolution in America|publisher=Wesleyan University Press|year=1987|location=Middletown, CT|isbn=978-0-8195-6177-0|oclc=14212813}}, pp. 148–56, 155–57, 169–70</ref> and the establishment of the ] in 1686. Colonists, however, felt that the Dominion was undermining their democratic liberty<ref>Lovejoy, pp. 180, 192–93, 197</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Barnes|first=Viola Florence|title=The Dominion of New England: A Study in British Colonial Policy|publisher=Frederick Ungar|location=New York|year=1960|origyear=1923|isbn=978-0-8044-1065-6|oclc=395292}}, pp. 169–70</ref> and they ] in 1689;<ref>{{cite book|last=Webb|first=Stephen Saunders|title=Lord Churchill's Coup: The Anglo-American Empire and the Glorious Revolution Reconsidered|publisher=Syracuse University Press|year=1998|isbn=978-0-8156-0558-4|oclc=39756272|location=Syracuse, NY}}, pp. 190–91</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Lustig|first=Mary Lou|title=The Imperial Executive in America: Sir Edmund Andros, 1637–1714|publisher=Fairleigh Dickinson University Press|year=2002|location=Madison, WI|isbn=978-0-8386-3936-8|oclc=470360764}}, p. 201</ref> the Crown made no attempt to restore it.<ref>{{cite book|last=Palfrey|first=John|title=History of New England: History of New England During the Stuart Dynasty|year=1864|publisher=Little, Brown|location=Boston|oclc=1658888|url=https://books.google.com/?id=A70rAAAAYAAJ}}, p. 596</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Evans|first=James Truslow|title=The Founding of New England|year=1922|publisher=The Atlantic Monthly Press|location=Boston|oclc=1068441|url=https://archive.org/details/foundingnewengl02adamgoog}}, p. 430</ref>
{{Further|Boston Tea Party|Pine Tree Riot}}


The huge debt incurred by the Seven Years' War and demands from British taxpayers for cuts in government expenditure meant ] expected the colonies to fund their own defense.<ref name="pb2Zp" /> The 1763 to 1765 ] instructed the ] to cease trading smuggled goods and enforce customs duties levied in American ports.<ref name="pb2Zp" /> The most important was the 1733 ]; routinely ignored before 1763, it had a significant economic impact since 85% of New England rum exports were manufactured from imported molasses. These measures were followed by the ] and ], which imposed additional taxes on the colonies to pay for defending the western frontier.<ref name="4R8zt">], pp. 183–184</ref> The taxes proved highly burdensome, particularly for the poorer classes, and quickly became a source of discontent.<ref>{{Cite journal |last=Kay |first=Marvin L. Michael |date=April 1969 |title=The Payment of Provincial and Local Taxes in North Carolina, 1748–1771 |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/1918676 |journal=] |volume=26 |issue=2 |pages=218–240 |doi=10.2307/1918676 |jstor=1918676 |access-date=1 September 2024}}</ref> In July 1765, the ] formed the ], which repealed the Stamp Act and reduced tax on foreign molasses to help the New England economy, but re-asserted Parliamentary authority in the ].<ref name="Leqka">], pp. 116, 187</ref>
The British government continued to pursue trade control, however, passing acts that taxed ],<ref>{{cite book |author= John A. Garraty |author2=Mark C. Carnes |title= A Short History of the American Nation | edition = 8th |year= 2000 |publisher= Longman |isbn= 0-321-07098-4 |chapter=Chapter Three: America in the British Empire |chapterurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080517130635/http://edweb.tusd.k12.az.us/uhs/WebSite/Courses/APUSH/1st%20Sem/Garraty%20Short%20History%20Chapters%201-18/chapter_threei.htm}}</ref> ],<ref>Max Savelle, , p.93 (1974)</ref> and ].<ref>Draper pg. 100. The quote provided by Draper came from Leo Francis Stock’s Proceedings and Debates of the British Parliaments respecting North America (1937) vol. 4. pg. 182</ref> The Molasses Act of 1733 was especially egregious to the colonists, as a significant part of colonial trade relied on the product. The taxes severely damaged the local economy, and consequently they were rarely paid. Smuggling, bribery, piracy, and intimidation of customs officials became commonplace.<ref>{{cite book |last=Miller |first=John C. |title=Origins of the American Revolution |publication-place= Boston |publisher= Little, Brown and company |date= 1943 |url= http://openlibrary.org/books/OL6453380M/Origins_of_the_American_revolution|ref=harv}}, pp. 95-e99</ref>
Colonial wars were also a contributing factor. The return of ] to France in 1748 following the ] caused considerable resentment in New England, the colonists having expended great effort in subduing the fortress only to have it returned to their erstwhile enemy.<ref>Guizot, M. ''A popular history of France, from the earliest times.'' Vol IV, University of Michigan, 2005, {{ISBN|978-1-4255-5724-9}}, p.166.</ref><ref>{{cite web|title=American Revolution|publisher=Britannica.com|url=https://www.britannica.com/event/American-Revolution|accessdate= 26 June 2017}}</ref>


However, this did little to end the discontent; in 1768, a riot started in Boston when the authorities seized the sloop '']'' on suspicion of smuggling.<ref name="sImY5">], p. 40</ref> Tensions escalated in March 1770 when British troops fired on rock-throwing civilians, killing five in what became known as the ].<ref name="kIDxS">], p. 23</ref> The Massacre coincided with the partial repeal of the ] by the Tory-based ]. North insisted on retaining duty on tea to enshrine Parliament's right to tax the colonies; the amount was minor, but ignored the fact it was that very principle Americans found objectionable.<ref name="HdjZT">], p. 52</ref>
=== Taxation disputes ===


In April 1772, colonialists staged the first American tax revolt against British royal authority in ], later referred to as the ].<ref>{{Cite web |title=The Weare NH Historical Society |url=http://wearehistoricalsociety.org/pineriot.php |access-date=2024-07-01 |website=wearehistoricalsociety.org}}</ref> This would inspire the design of the ]. Tensions escalated following the destruction of a customs vessel in the June 1772 ], then came to a head in 1773. A ] led to the near-collapse of the ], which dominated the British economy; to support it, Parliament passed the ], giving it a trading monopoly in the ]. Since most American tea was smuggled by the Dutch, the act was opposed by those who managed the illegal trade, while being seen as another attempt to impose the principle of taxation by Parliament.<ref name="oTpsv">], pp. 155–156</ref> In December 1773, a group called the ] disguised as ]s dumped crates of tea into ], an event later known as the ]. The British Parliament responded by passing the so-called ], aimed specifically at Massachusetts, although many colonists and members of the Whig opposition considered them a threat to liberty in general. This increased sympathy for the ] cause locally, in the British Parliament, and in the London press.<ref name="t3NFX">], p. 15</ref>
Britain triumphed over France and Spain in the ], but this led to a financial crisis, as the national debt had doubled to £130 million, and the annual cost of the British civil and military establishment in America had quintupled when compared to 1749.<ref>Debt & Taxes, John Makim & Norman Ornstein P.54</ref> Smuggling had been tacitly accepted, but now the British began to consider that it blunted their revenue, so Whitehall decided to ensure that customs duties were unavoidable<ref>Spain & the Independence of the United States; An Intrinsic Gift. Thomas E, Chavez P.22</ref> by passing the ] in 1765. Colonists condemned the tax because their ] protected them from being taxed by a Parliament in which they had ].<ref>{{cite book|author=Gladney, Henry M. |title=No Taxation without Representation: 1768 Petition, Memorial, and Remonstrance |year=2014 |url=http://www.hgladney.com/PMR/No_Taxation_without_Representation_(book_description).pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150513135503/http://www.hgladney.com/PMR/No_Taxation_without_Representation_%28book_description%29.pdf |archive-date=May 13, 2015 |deadurl=yes |df= }}</ref> Parliament argued that the colonies were "]", an idea that was criticized throughout the Empire.<ref name="google1">{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YKYOAAAAQAAJ|title=Liberty and Property: Political Ideology in Eighteenth-century Britain – H. T. Dickinson – Google Books|publisher=Books.google.com|date=1977|accessdate=2015-01-07|isbn=9780416729306|page=218}}</ref> Parliament did repeal the act in 1766; however, it also ] to pass laws that were binding on the colonies.<ref>{{cite book|author=Charles Howard McIlwain|title=The American Revolution: A Constitutional Interpretation|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uPCOs3MBUUEC&pg=PA51|year=1938|page=51}}</ref> From 1767, Parliament began passing ] to raise revenue for the salaries of civil officials, ensuring their loyalty while inadvertently increasing resentment among the colonists, and opposition soon became widespread.<ref>{{cite book|author=Paul Boyer|title=The Enduring Vision: A History of the American People|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kDAaCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA142|year=2014|publisher=Cengage Learning|page=142|display-authors=etal}}</ref><ref>Knollenberg, Growth, 48; Thomas, Duties Crisis, 76</ref>


===Break with the British Crown===
Enforcing the acts proved difficult; the seizure of the sloop '']'' on suspicions of smuggling triggered a riot. In response, British troops occupied Boston, and Parliament threatened to ] to face trial in England.<ref>Knollenberg, Growth, 69</ref> Tensions rose after the murder of a ] in 1770 and escalated into outrage after British troops fired on civilians in the ].<ref>{{cite web|title=What was the Boston Massacre?|website=Boston Massacre Society|url=http://www.bostonmassacre.net/}}</ref> In 1772, colonists in ] boarded and burned a ]. Parliament then repealed all taxes except the one on tea, passing the ] in 1773, attempting to force colonists to buy ] tea on which the Townshend duties were paid, thus implicitly agreeing to Parliamentary supremacy. The landing of the tea was resisted in all colonies, but the ] permitted British tea ships to remain in ]—so the ] ] chests.<ref>{{cite web|title=Boston Tea Party|website=History.com.|accessdate=|url=http://www.history.com/topics/american-revolution/boston-tea-party}}</ref>
{{Further|Battles of Lexington and Concord|First Continental Congress}}


Throughout the 18th century, the ] in the colonial legislatures gradually wrested power from their governors.<ref name="0pRKw">], pp. 543–544</ref> Dominated by smaller landowners and merchants, these assemblies now established ad-hoc provincial legislatures, effectively replacing royal control. With the exception of ], twelve colonies sent representatives to the ] to agree on a unified response to the crisis.<ref name="0j3B4">], p. 112</ref> Many of the delegates feared that a boycott would result in war and sent a ] calling for the repeal of the Intolerable Acts.<ref name="BkMNP">], p. 102</ref> After some debate, on September 17, 1774, Congress endorsed the Massachusetts ] and on October 20 passed the ], which instituted ] and a boycott of goods against Britain.<ref name="yBXBu">], p. 199</ref>
] was entitled "The Destruction of Tea at Boston Harbor"; the phrase "Boston Tea Party" had not yet become standard. Contrary to Currier's depiction, few of the men dumping the tea were actually disguised as Indians.<ref>Young, ''Shoemaker'', 183–85.</ref>]]


While denying its authority over internal American affairs, a faction led by ] and future ] ] insisted Congress recognize Parliament's right to regulate colonial trade.<ref name="yBXBu" />{{Efn|"Resolved, 4. That the foundation of English liberty, and of all free government, is a right in the people to participate in their legislative council: ... they are entitled to a free and exclusive power of legislation in their several provincial legislatures, where their right of representation can alone be preserved, in all cases of taxation and internal polity, subject only to the negative of their sovereign, ...: But, ... we cheerfully consent to the operation of such acts of the British parliament, as are bonafide, restrained to the regulation of our external commerce, for the purpose of securing the commercial advantages of the whole empire to the mother country, and the commercial benefits of its respective members; excluding every idea of taxation internal or external, ." quoted from the Declarations and Resolves of the First Continental Congress October 14, 1774.}} Expecting concessions by the North administration, Congress authorized the colonial legislatures to enforce the boycott; this succeeded in reducing British imports by 97% from 1774 to 1775.<ref name="RVpda">], p. 21</ref> However, on February 9 Parliament declared Massachusetts to be in rebellion and instituted a blockade of the colony.<ref name="X94UC">], pp. 62–64</ref> In July, the ] limited colonial trade with the ] and Britain and barred New England ships from the ]. The tension led to a scramble for control of militia stores, which each assembly was legally obliged to maintain for defense.<ref name="JNwEc">], p. 83</ref> On April 19, a British attempt to secure the Concord arsenal culminated in the ], which began the Revolutionary War.<ref name="Ng1sv">], p. 76</ref>
Parliament then passed punitive legislation. It ] until the tea was paid for and ] the ], taking upon themselves the right to directly appoint the ]. Additionally, the royal governor was granted powers to undermine local democracy.<ref>http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/mass_gov_act.asp</ref><ref>Ian R. Christie and Benjamin W. Labaree, Empire or Independence, 1760–1776 (New York: Norton, 1976) p. 188.</ref> ] allowed the extradition of officials for trial elsewhere in the Empire, if the governor felt that a fair trial could not be secured locally. The act's vague reimbursement policy for travel expenses left few with the ability to testify, and colonists argued that it would allow officials to harass them with impunity.<ref>{{cite book |title=In the Common Cause: American Response to the Coercive Acts of 1774 |last=Ammerman |first=David |publisher=Norton |year=1974 |isbn= |location=New York }}, p. 9</ref> ] allowed the governor to ] troops in private property without permission.<ref>Ammerman points out that the act only permitted soldiers to be quartered in unoccupied buildings—although they were still private property. (Ammerman, In the Common Cause, 10)</ref> The colonists referred to the measures as the "]", and they argued that both their constitutional rights and their ] were being violated, viewing the acts as a threat to all of America.<ref>Ammerman, ''In the Common Cause,'' 15.</ref> The acts were widely opposed, driving neutral parties into support of the ] and curtailing ] sentiment.<ref>{{cite book|author1=Gary B. Nash|author2=Carter Smith|title=Atlas Of American History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tyzmAJfLKs8C&pg=PA64|year=2007|publisher=Infobase Publishing|page=64|isbn=9781438130132}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Peter Knight|title=Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qMIDrggs8TsC&pg=PA184|year=2003|publisher=ABC-CLIO|pages=184–85|isbn=9781576078129}}</ref>


=== Colonial response === ===Political reactions===
{{Main|Olive Branch Petition}}
], who were charged with drafting the ], including (from left to right): ] (chair), ], ], ] (the Declaration's principal author), and ]]]


After the Patriot victory at Concord, moderates in Congress led by ] drafted the ], offering to accept royal authority in return for George III mediating in the dispute.<ref name="nessy25">], p. 25</ref> However, since the petition was immediately followed by the ], Colonial Secretary ] viewed the offer as insincere and refused to present the petition to the king.<ref name="NXP0A">], pp. 29–31</ref> Although constitutionally correct, since the monarch could not oppose his own government, it disappointed those Americans who hoped he would mediate in the dispute, while the hostility of his language annoyed even Loyalist members of Congress.<ref name="nessy25" /> Combined with the ], issued on August 23 in response to the ], it ended hopes of a peaceful settlement.<ref name="ketchum211">], p. 211</ref>
The colonists responded by establishing the ], effectively removing Crown control of the colony outside Boston. Meanwhile, representatives from twelve colonies{{refn|Georgia did not attend}}<ref>Ferling, John. (2003). A Leap in the Dark. Oxford University Press. p. 112.</ref> convened the ] to respond to the crisis. The Congress narrowly rejected a proposal which would have created an ] to act in concert with the British Parliament; instead, they passed ] declaring a ] against Britain.<ref name=Kindig>{{cite web|last1=Kindig |first1=Thomas E. |title=Galloway's Plan for the Union of Great Britain and the Colonies |url=http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/planforunion.htm |website=Declaration of Independence |publisher=], publishing electronically as ushistory.org. |accessdate=March 14, 2015 |location=], USA |date=1995 |quote=The plan was considered very attractive to most of the members, as it proposed a popularly elected Grand Council which would represent the interests of the colonies as a whole, and would be a continental equivalent to the English Parliament. After a sincere debate, it was rejected by a six to five vote on October 22, 1774. It may have been the arrival of the Suffolk County (Boston) resolutions that killed it. |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20150402104121/http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/related/planforunion.htm |archivedate=April 2, 2015 |df= }}</ref><ref name="Kramnick, Isaac 1982 p. 21">Kramnick, Isaac (ed); Thomas Paine (1982). Common Sense. Penguin Classics. p. 21.</ref> Congress also affirmed that Parliament had no authority over internal American matters, but they were willing to consent to trade regulations for the benefit of the empire,<ref>"Resolved, 4. That the foundation of English liberty, and of all free government, is a right in the people to participate in their legislative council: and as the English colonists are not represented, and from their local and other circumstances, cannot properly be represented in the British parliament, they are entitled to a free and exclusive power of legislation in their several provincial legislatures, where their right of representation can alone be preserved, in all cases of taxation and internal polity, subject only to the negative of their sovereign, in such manner as has been heretofore used and accustomed: But, from the necessity of the case, and a regard to the mutual interest of both countries, we cheerfully consent to the operation of such acts of the British parliament, as are bonfide, restrained to the regulation of our external commerce, for the purpose of securing the commercial advantages of the whole empire to the mother country, and the commercial benefits of its respective members; excluding every idea of taxation internal or external, for raising a revenue on the subjects, in America, without their consent." quoted from the October 14, 1774.</ref> and they authorized committees and conventions to enforce the boycott. The boycott was effective, as imports from Britain dropped by 97% in 1775 compared to 1774.<ref name="Kramnick, Isaac 1982 p. 21"/>


Backed by the Whigs, Parliament initially rejected the imposition of coercive measures by 170 votes, fearing an aggressive policy would drive the Americans towards independence.<ref name="maier25">], p. 25</ref> However, by the end of 1774 the collapse of British authority meant both Lord North and George III were convinced war was inevitable.<ref name="fFVBS">], pp. 123–124</ref> After Boston, Gage halted operations and awaited reinforcements; the ] approved the recruitment of new regiments, while allowing Catholics to enlist for the first time.<ref name="lecky162-165">], vol. 3, pp. 162–165</ref> Britain also signed a series of treaties with German states to supply ].<ref name="davenport132-144">], pp. 132–144</ref> Within a year, it had an army of over 32,000 men in America, the largest ever sent outside Europe at the time.<ref name="smith21-23">], pp. 21–23</ref> The employment of German soldiers against people viewed as British citizens was opposed by many in Parliament and by the colonial assemblies; combined with the lack of activity by Gage, opposition to the use of foreign troops allowed the Patriots to take control of the legislatures.<ref name="miller410">], pp. 410–412</ref>
Parliament refused to yield. In 1775, it declared Massachusetts to be in a state of rebellion and enforced a blockade of the colony.<ref>Cogliano, Francis D. ''Revolutionary America, 1763–1815: A Political History''. Routledge, 1999. pp. 47</ref><ref>Cogliano, Revolutionary America, 47–48</ref> It then passed ] colonial trade to the British West Indies and the British Isles. Colonial ships were barred from the Newfoundland cod fisheries, a measure which pleased ] but damaged New England's economy. These increasing tensions led to a ] and pushed the colonies toward open war.<ref>Alan Axelrod, , p. 83</ref> ] was the British ] and military governor of Massachusetts, and he received orders on April 14, 1775 to disarm the local militias.<ref>Fischer, p. 76</ref>


== Course of the war == ===Declaration of Independence===
{{Main|United States Declaration of Independence}}


Support for independence was boosted by ]'s pamphlet '']'', which was published on January 10, 1776, and argued for American self-government and was widely reprinted.<ref name="maier33-34">], pp. 33–34</ref> To draft the ], the ] appointed the ]: ], ], ], ], and ].<ref name="mccullough119">], pp. 119–122</ref> The declaration was written almost exclusively by Jefferson.<ref>, National Park Services</ref>
=== War breaks out (1775–1776) ===


Identifying inhabitants of the Thirteen Colonies as "one people", the declaration simultaneously dissolved political links with Britain, while including a long list of alleged violations of "English rights" committed by ]. This is also one of the first times that the colonies were referred to as "United States", rather than the more common ].<ref name="ferling112">], pp. 112, 118</ref>
{{Main|Battles of Lexington and Concord|Boston campaign|Invasion of Quebec (1775)|Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War#Early operations, 1775–1778|Battle of Nassau}}


On July 2, Congress voted for independence and published the declaration on July 4.<ref name="R0xyC">], pp. 160–161</ref> At this point, the revolution ceased to be an internal dispute over trade and tax policies and had evolved into a civil war, since each state represented in Congress was engaged in a struggle with Britain, but also split between American Patriots and American Loyalists.<ref name="IE7Bq">], p. 2</ref> Patriots generally supported independence from Britain and a new national union in Congress, while Loyalists remained faithful to British rule. Estimates of numbers vary, one suggestion being the population as a whole was split evenly between committed Patriots, committed Loyalists, and those who were indifferent.<ref name="DEcPu">], p. 3</ref> Others calculate the split as 40% Patriot, 40% neutral, 20% Loyalist, but with considerable regional variations.<ref name="Greene p. 235">], p. 235</ref>
] in April 1775]]


At the onset of the war, the Second Continental Congress realized defeating Britain required foreign alliances and intelligence-gathering. The ] was formed for "the sole purpose of corresponding with our friends in Great Britain and other parts of the world". From 1775 to 1776, the committee shared information and built alliances through secret correspondence, as well as employing secret agents in Europe to gather intelligence, conduct undercover operations, analyze foreign publications, and initiate Patriot propaganda campaigns.<ref name="cia2007">], "Intelligence Until WWII"</ref> Paine served as secretary, while Benjamin Franklin and ], sent to France to recruit military engineers,<ref>], pp. 86–87</ref> were instrumental in securing French aid in Paris.<ref name="rose43">]&nbsp;, p. 43</ref>
On April 18, 1775, 700 troops were sent to confiscate militia ordnance stored at ].<ref>Fischer, p. 85</ref><ref name="Chidsey6">], p. 6. This is the total size of Smith's force.</ref> ], forcing the regulars to conduct a fighting withdrawal to ]. Overnight, the local militia converged on and ].<ref>Ketchum, pp. 18,54</ref> On March 25, 4,500 British reinforcements arrived with three senior generals; ], ] and ].<ref>Ketchum, pp. 2–9</ref> On June 17, the British ] after a costly frontal assault,<ref>Ketchum pp. 110–111</ref><ref>Adams, Charles Francis, , in ''American Historical Review'' (1895–1896), pp. 401–13.</ref> leading Howe to replace Gage.<ref>Higginbotham (1983), pp.&nbsp;75–77.</ref> Many senior officers were dismayed at the attack which had gained them little,<ref>Ketchum, p. 183, 198–209</ref> while Gage wrote to London stressing the need for a large army to suppress the revolt.<ref>{{cite book|author=Hugh F. Rankin, ed.|title=Rebels and Redcoats: The American Revolution Through the Eyes of Those who Fought and Lived it|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_BiqdpZ9hlcC&pg=PA63|year=1987|publisher=Da Capo Press|page=63}}</ref> On July 3, ] took command of the ] besieging Boston. Howe made no effort to attack, much to Washington's surprise.<ref>Lecky, William Edward Hartpole, (1882), pp. 449–50.</ref> After a plan to assault the city was rejected,<ref>McCullough, p.53</ref> in early March 1776, the Americans ] with ] captured ].<ref name="Frothingham100">], pp. 100–101</ref> On March 17, the British were ] unmolested, sailing to ], ]. Washington then moved his army to ].<ref>{{cite book|author=John R. Alden|title=A History of the American Revolution|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-o03VtlglokC&pg=PA189|year=1989|publisher=Da Capo Press|pages=188–90}}</ref>


==War breaks out==
Meanwhile, British officials in ] began lobbying Native American tribes to support them,<ref name="Smith14I_293">], p. 293</ref> while the Americans attempted to maintain their neutrality.<ref name="Glatthaar91">], p. 91</ref><ref name="Glatthaar93">], p. 93</ref> Fearing an Anglo-Indian attack from Canada, Congress authorized an invasion of Quebec. Quebec, with a largely ] population, had only been under British rule for twelve years,{{refn|Quebec was officially ]}} and the Americans expected that liberating them from the British would be welcomed.<ref name="Smith14I_242">], p. 242</ref><ref>{{cite book|title=Major General Richard Montgomery: The Making of an American Hero|first=Michael P.|last=Gabriel|publisher=Fairleigh Dickinson Univ Press|year=2002|ref=Gabriel|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1x2neu9sFNEC&lpg=PP1&dq=Major%20General%20Richard%20Montgomery%3A%20The%20Making%20of%20an%20American%20Hero&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=true|isbn=978-0-8386-3931-3}}, p. 141</ref><ref>Mark R. Anderson, ''The Battle for the Fourteenth Colony: America's War of Liberation in Canada, 1774–1776'' (University Press of New England; 2013).</ref> After ],<ref>Alden, ''The American Revolution'' (1954) p. 206</ref> the Americans attacked Quebec City on December 31, which was ].<ref>], "Benedict Arnold at Quebec", ''MHQ: Quarterly Journal of Military History'', Summer 1990, Vol. 2, Issue 4, pp 38–49.</ref><ref>Davies, Blodwen (1951). Quebec: Portrait of a Province. Greenberg. p. 32.Carleton's men had won a quick and decisive victory</ref> After a loose siege, the Americans withdrew on May 6. 1776.<ref name="Lanctot141_146">], pp. 141–146</ref><ref>Thomas A. Desjardin, ''Through a Howling Wilderness: Benedict Arnold's March to Quebec, 1775'' (2006).</ref> A ] on June 8 ended American operations in Quebec.<ref name="Stanley127_128">], pp. 127–128</ref> However, the British could not conduct an aggressive pursuit, due to the presence of American ships on ]. On October 11, the ], forcing the Americans to withdraw to ], ending the campaign. The invasion cost the Patriots their support in British public opinion,<ref>Watson (1960), p.&nbsp;203.</ref> while aggressive anti-Loyalist policies diluted ] support.<ref>Arthur S. Lefkowitz, ''Benedict Arnold's Army: The 1775 American Invasion of Canada during the Revolutionary War'' (2007).</ref> The Patriots continued to view Quebec as a strategic aim, though no further attempts to invade were ever realized.<ref name="Smith14II_459_552">], pp. 459–552</ref>
{{main|Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War|Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War}}
{{also|Western theater of the American Revolutionary War}}
{{more|Naval battles of the American Revolutionary War}}


], ], December 1775]]


===Early engagements===
In ], the ], ], had attempted to ] as tensions increased, although no fighting broke out.<ref>Selby and Higginbotham, p. 2</ref> After war broke out, Dunmore issued a ] on November 7, 1775, promising freedom for slaves who fled their Patriot masters to fight for the Crown.<ref name="The First Emancipator">{{cite book|last=Levy|first=Andrew|title=The First Emancipator: Slavery, Religion, and the Quiet Revolution of Robert Carter|date=Jan 9, 2007|publisher=Random House Trade Paperbacks|isbn=978-0375761041|page=74}}</ref><ref>{{cite book |last=Scribner |first=Robert L. |authorlink=Robert L. Scribner |title=Revolutionary Virginia, the Road to Independence |publisher=] |year=1983 |pages=''xxiv'' |isbn=0-8139-0748-9}}</ref> After Dunmore's troops were ] at ], Dunmore fled to naval ships anchored off ]. After negotiations broke down, Dunmore ordered the ships to ].<ref>Russell, p. 73</ref> In ], ] on November 19 between Loyalist and Patriot militias,<ref>McCrady, p. 89</ref> and the Loyalists were subsequently ].<ref>{{cite book|last=Landrum|first=John Belton O'Neall|title=Colonial and Revolutionary History of Upper South Carolina|publisher=Shannon|year=1897|location=Greenville, SC|oclc=187392639|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4IwGAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA72#v=onepage&f=false}}, pp. 80–81</ref> Loyalists recruited in ] to reassert colonial rule in the South were ], subduing Loyalist sentiment.<ref>{{cite book|first=David K|last=Wilson|title=The Southern Strategy: Britain's Conquest of South Carolina and Georgia, 1775–1780|publisher=University of South Carolina Press|location=Columbia, SC|year=2005|isbn=1-57003-573-3|oclc=56951286}}, p. 33</ref> An expedition of British regulars to reconquer South Carolina launched a ] on June 28, 1776,<ref>Hibbert, C: Rebels and Redcoats, p.106</ref> effectively leaving the South in Patriot control until 1780.<ref name="Jstor link">Kepner, F, "A British View of the Siege of Charleston, 1776", ''The Journal of Southern History'', Vol. 11, No. 1. (Feb., 1945), p. 94 </ref><ref>Bicheno, H: ''Rebels and Redcoats'', p.154, 158</ref>
{{Further|Battles of Lexington and Concord|Shot heard round the world}}


] attack at the ] in December 1775]]
The shortage of gunpowder had led Congress to authorize an expedition against the ] in the ], in order to secure ordnance there.<ref>{{cite book|title=Esek Hopkins, commander-in-chief of the continental navy during the American Revolution, 1775 to 1778|first=Edward|last=Field|year=1898|publisher=Preston & Rounds|ref=Field|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GEEvAAAAYAAJ|oclc=3430958|location=Providence}}, p. 104</ref> On March 3, 1776, the Americans landed after a ], and the local militia offered no resistance.<ref>{{cite book|title=Essays in the economic history of the Atlantic world|first=John J|last=McCusker|ref=McCusker|publisher=Routledge|year=1997|isbn=978-0-415-16841-0|location=London|oclc=470415294}}, p. 185-187</ref> For two weeks, the Americans confiscated all the supplies they could load, and sailed away on March 17.<ref>Riley, pp. 101–102</ref><ref>Field, pp. 117–118</ref> After a ] with the Royal Navy frigate '']'' on April 6, the squadron reached ] on April 8.<ref>Field, pp. 120–125</ref>
] of the 2nd South Carolina Regiment, on a parapet raising the fort's South Carolina Revolutionary flag with its white crescent moon.|Sergeant ] of the ] raises the fort's flag at the ] in ], in June 1776]]


On April 14, 1775, Sir ], ] and ], received orders to take action against the Patriots. He decided to destroy militia ordnance stored at ], and capture ] and ], who were considered the principal instigators of the rebellion. The operation was to begin around midnight on April 19, in the hope of completing it before the American Patriots could respond.<ref name="oSWXd">], p. 29</ref><ref name="icqWN">Fischer, p. 85</ref> However, ] learned of the plan and notified Captain ], commander of the ] militia, who prepared to resist.<ref name="Q5xrq">], pp. 129–19{{page needed|date=June 2023}}</ref> The first action of the war, commonly referred to as the ], was a brief skirmish at Lexington, followed by the full-scale Battles of Lexington and Concord. British troops suffered around 300 casualties before withdrawing to ], which was then ] by the militia.<ref name="Hyy3u">], pp. 18, 54</ref>
=== Political reactions ===
{{Main|Olive Branch Petition|United States Declaration of Independence}}


In May 1775, 4,500 British reinforcements arrived under Generals ], ], and ].<ref name="lSvP0">], pp. 2–9</ref> On June 17, they seized the ] at the ], a frontal assault in which they suffered over 1,000 casualties.<ref name="TZZpb">]&nbsp;, pp. 75–77</ref> Dismayed at the costly attack which had gained them little,<ref name="jP5Oe">], pp. 183, 198–209</ref> Gage appealed to London for a larger army,<ref name="ktPiL">], p. 63</ref> but instead was replaced as commander by Howe.<ref name="TZZpb" />
After fighting began, ] launched a ], which Parliament rejected as insincere.<ref name="constitution.org taking up arms">{{cite web | url=http://www.constitution.org/bcp/takuparm.htm | title=DECLARATION OF TAKING UP ARMS: RESOLUTIONS OF THE SECOND CONTINENTAL CONGRESS | publisher=Constitution Society | accessdate=2013-09-23}}</ref> ] ] then issued a ] on August 23, 1775, leading to an emboldening of hitherto weak support for independence in the colonies.<ref>Ketchum, p.211</ref> After a speech by the King, Parliament rejected to oppose coercive measures on the colonies by 170 votes.<ref>Maier, ''American Scripture'', 25. The text of the 1775 ] is , published by the ] project.</ref> British ] refused to compromise,<ref>Middlekauff, Glorious Cause, 168; Ferling, Leap in the Dark, 123–24.</ref> while ] argued current policy would drive the colonists towards secession.<ref>Maier, American Scripture, 25</ref> Despite opposition, the King himself began micromanaging the war effort.{{citation needed|date=May 2017}}<ref>Andrew Jackson O'Shaughnessy, ''The Men who Lost America: British Leadership, the American Revolution, and the Fate of the Empire'' (Yale UP, 2013).</ref>{{vague|date=May 2017}} The ] pledged to send troops to America,<ref>{{cite book|author=Frank A. Biletz|title=Historical Dictionary of Ireland|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rb8eAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA8|year=2013|publisher=Scarecrow Press|page=8}}</ref> and Irish Catholics were allowed to enlist in the army for the first time.<ref name="Lecky 162–65">{{cite book|author=Lecky|title=A History of England|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m3cUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA162|pages=162–65}}</ref> ] favored the Americans, while ] favored the King.<ref>{{cite book|author=Vincent Morley|title=Irish Opinion and the American Revolution, 1760–1783|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iBrJz9XYzNgC&pg=PA154|year=2002|publisher=Cambridge UP|pages=154–57}}</ref>


On June 14, 1775, Congress took control of Patriot forces outside Boston, and Congressional leader John Adams nominated Washington as commander-in-chief of the newly formed ].<ref name="nXlAp">], p. 186</ref> On June 16, Hancock officially proclaimed him "General and Commander in Chief of the army of the United Colonies."<ref name="Nx1rV">], p. 187</ref> He assumed command on July 3, preferring to ] outside Boston rather than assaulting it.<ref name="CH6Xw">], p. 53</ref> In early March 1776, Colonel ] arrived with ] acquired in the ].<ref name="rFWWw">], pp. 100–101</ref> Under cover of darkness, on March 5, Washington placed these on Dorchester Heights,<ref name="E7Y0J">], p. 183</ref> from where they could fire on the town and British ships in Boston Harbor. Fearing another Bunker Hill, Howe evacuated the city on ] without further loss and sailed to ], while Washington moved south to New York City.<ref name="IDjnL">], pp. 188–190</ref>
Militarily, the ] was a sobering lesson for the British, causing them to rethink their views on colonial military capability.<ref name="Ketchum208_9">], pp. 208–209</ref><ref name="Frothingham298">], p. 298</ref> The weak British response gave the Patriots the advantage; the British lost control over every colony.<ref name="John C. Miller 1959 410–12">{{cite book|author=John C. Miller|title=Origins of the American Revolution|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DlmrAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA410|year=1959|publisher=Stanford UP|pages=410–12}}</ref> The army had been kept deliberately small ] to prevent abuses of power by the King.<ref name="Scheer64">], p. 64</ref> Parliament secured treaties with small German states for ],<ref name="library.si.edu">http://library.si.edu/digital-library/book/hessiansotherge00lowe</ref> and, after a year, were able to send an army of 32,000 men to America, the largest it had ever sent outside Europe at the time.<ref>{{cite book|author=David Smith|title=New York 1776: The Continentals' First Battle|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IlMa-Krnxl8C&pg=PA21|year=2012|publisher=Osprey Publishing|pages=21–23}}</ref>


Beginning in August 1775, ] raided towns in Nova Scotia, including ], ], and ]. In 1776, ] and ] attacked ] and ] respectively. British officials in ] began negotiating with the ] for their support,<ref name="QwMwp">]&nbsp;vol. 1, p. 293</ref> while US envoys urged them to remain neutral.<ref name="yGdMY">], pp. 91, 93</ref> Aware of Native American leanings toward the British and fearing an Anglo-Indian attack from Canada, Congress authorized a second invasion in April 1775.<ref name="eWWH5">], pp. 504–505</ref> After the defeat at the ] on December 31,<ref name="Jfxzh">], pp. 38–39</ref> the Americans maintained a loose blockade of the city until they retreated on May 6, 1776.<ref name="yYbsM">], pp. 141–246</ref> A second defeat at ] on June 8 ended operations in Quebec.<ref name="qYcQ0">], pp. 127–128</ref>
In the colonies, the success of ] pamphlet '']'' had boosted public support for independence.<ref>Christie and Labaree, Empire or Independence, 270; Maier, American Scripture, 31–32.</ref><ref>Maier, American Scripture, 33–34</ref> On July 2, Congress voted in favor of independence with twelve affirmatives and one abstention,<ref>Boyd, Evolution, 19</ref> ] on July 4.<ref>Maier, American Scripture, 160–61</ref> Washington read the ] to his men and the citizens of New York on July 9,<ref>Fischer (2004), p.&nbsp;29.</ref> invigorating the crowd to tear down a lead statue of the King, melting it to make bullets.<ref>Maier, American Scripture, 156–57</ref> British Tories criticized the signatories for not extending the same standards of equality to ]. Patriots followed independence with the Test Laws, requiring residents to swear allegiance to the state in which they lived,<ref>Encyclopedia of the American Revolution Mark M. Botner III, (1974) P. 1094.</ref> intending to root out neutrals or opponents to independence. Failure to do so meant possible imprisonment, exile, and, in some cases, death.<ref>Liberty's Exiles; American Loyalists & the Revolutionary World. Maya Jasanoff (2011)</ref> American Tories were barred from public office, forbidden from practising medicine and law, forced to pay increased taxes, barred from executing wills or becoming guardians to orphans.<ref>The American Revolution; Colin Bonwick (1991) P.152</ref><ref name="American History 1982 p. 130">Encyclopedia of American History. Richard B. Morris and Jeffrey B. Morris, eds., 6th Edition (New York: Harper & Row Publishers, 1982), p. 130.</ref> Congress enabled states to confiscate Loyalist property to fund the war,<ref>Flight of the Tories from the Republic, The Tories of the American Revolution. North Callahan (1967) P. 120.</ref> and offered them a choice between swearing loyalty to the republic, or either face exile, or forfeit the right to protection. ]s, who remained neutral, had their property confiscated. States later prevented Loyalists from collecting any debts they were owed.<ref>Land confiscation Records of north Carolina – Vol.1 (1779–1800) Stewart Dunaway P.9</ref>


British pursuit was initially blocked by American naval vessels on ] until victory at ] on October 11 forced the Americans to withdraw to ], while in December an uprising in Nova Scotia sponsored by Massachusetts was defeated at ].<ref name="84Tbw">]&nbsp;vol. 1, p. 242</ref> These failures impacted public support for the Patriot cause,<ref name="MCw6s">], p. 203</ref> and aggressive anti-Loyalist policies in the ] alienated the Canadians.<ref name="ZFLSb">], pp. 264–265</ref>
=== British counter-offensive (1776–1777) ===
{{Main|New York and New Jersey campaign}}


In Virginia, ] on November 7, 1775, promised freedom to any ] who fled their Patriot masters and agreed to fight for the Crown.<ref name="A8wFb">], p. 74</ref> British forces were defeated at ] on December 9 and took refuge on British ships anchored near Norfolk. When the ] refused to disband its militia or accept martial law, ] ordered the ] on January 1, 1776.<ref name="1FC9n">Russell 2000, p. 73</ref>
], 1776]]


The ] began on November 19 in ] between Loyalist and Patriot militias,<ref name="CdDYP">], p. 89</ref> and the Loyalists were subsequently driven out of the colony in the ].<ref name="3Ehts">], pp. 80–81</ref> Loyalists were recruited in ] to reassert British rule in the South, but they were decisively defeated in the ].<ref name="ZWeHt">], p. 33</ref> A British expedition sent to reconquer ] launched an attack on Charleston in the ] on June 28, 1776,<ref name="efEyN">], p. 106</ref> but it failed.<ref name="LWF70">], pp. 154, 158</ref>
After regrouping at Halifax, William Howe determined to take the fight to the Americans.<ref>Fischer, pp. 76–78</ref> Howe set sail in June 1776, and began landing troops on ] on July 2. Due to poor intelligence, Washington split his army to positions across the city.<ref>Fischer, pp. 89, 381</ref> An informal attempt to negotiate peace was rejected by the Americans.<ref>Ketchum (1973), p. 104</ref> On August 27, Howe ] and forced him back to ]. Had Howe chose to land on ], Washington could have been encircled and his army destroyed.<ref name="Battle of Long Island">Adams, Charles Francis, , in ''American Historical Review'' (1895–1896), pp. 668–669.</ref> Howe restrained his subordinates from pursuit, opting to besiege Washington instead.<ref name="Adams, Charles Francis 1896 p. 657">Adams, Charles Francis, , in ''American Historical Review'' (1895–1896), p. 657.</ref> Washington managed to withdraw to Manhattan without any losses in men or ordnance.<ref>Fischer, pp. 88–102</ref> Following the withdrawal, a ] to negotiate peace failed, as the British delegates did not possess authorization to grant independence.<ref>Ketchum (1973), p. 117</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Thomas J. McGuire|title=Stop the Revolution: America in the Summer of Independence and the Conference for Peace|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OsNi7Byog6kC&pg=PA166|year=2011|publisher=Stackpole Books|pages=165–66}}</ref> Howe then ] of New York on September 15, and unsuccessfully ] the following day.<ref>Fischer, pp. 102–107</ref> Howe attempted ], but the Americans successfully withdrew. On October 28, the British fought ] against Washington, in which Howe declined to attack Washington's army, instead concentrating his efforts upon a hill that was of no strategic value.<ref name="Fischer 2004, pp. 102–11">Fischer (2004), pp.&nbsp;102–11.</ref><ref name="Barnet Schecter 2002">Barnet Schecter, ''The battle for New York: The city at the heart of the American Revolution'' (2002).</ref>


A shortage of gunpowder led Congress to authorize a naval expedition against ] to secure ordnance stored there.<ref name="field104">], p. 104</ref> On March 3, 1776, an American squadron under the command of Esek Hopkins landed at the east end of ] and encountered minimal resistance at ]. Hopkins' troops then marched on ]. Hopkins had promised governor ] and the civilian inhabitants that their lives and property would not be in any danger if they offered no resistance; they complied. Hopkins captured large stores of powder and other munitions that was so great he had to impress an extra ship in the harbor to transport the supplies back home, when he departed on March 17.<ref name="field117-118">], pp. 114–118</ref> A month later, after a ] with {{HMS|Glasgow|1757|6}}, they returned to ], the base for American naval operations.<ref name="I4JgD">], pp. 120–125</ref>
]


===British New York counter-offensive===
Washington's retreat left the remnants of his forces isolated, and, on November 16, the British ], taking 3,000 prisoners, amounting to the worst American defeat to date.<ref>Ketchum p.130</ref><ref>Ketchum p.111-"The most disastrous defeat of the entire war"</ref> Washington fell back four days later.<ref>Fischer, pp. 109–125</ref> ] then captured ], an operation which he opposed, feeling the 6,000 troops assigned to him could have been better employed in the pursuit of Washington.<ref name="Ridpath 1915">{{cite book|last=Ridpath|first=John Clark|title=The new complete history of the United States of America, Volume 6|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y8lKAAAAYAAJ&dq=Percy%20Clinton%20Newport%201776&pg=PA2531#v=onepage&q=Percy%20Clinton%20Newport%201776&f=false|publisher=Jones Brothers|year=1915|oclc=2140537|location=Cincinnati}}, p. 2531</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=David McCullough|title=1776|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5LBVT46o5yQC&pg=PT122|year=2006|page=122}}</ref><ref name="Stedman, Charles 1794 p. 221">Stedman, Charles, (1794), p. 221.</ref> The American prisoners were then sent to the ], in which more American soldiers and sailors died of disease and neglect than died in every battle of the war combined.<ref>Larry Lowenthal, ''Hell on the East River: British Prison Ships in the American Revolution'' (2009).</ref> ] pursued Washington, but Howe ordered him to halt, and Washington escaped unmolested.<ref>{{cite book|author=Mary Tucker|title=Washington Crossing the Delaware|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IZUx6QnUxxQC&pg=PA22|date=March 1, 2002|publisher=Lorenz Educational Press|pages=22–23}}</ref><ref>Stedman, Charles, (1794), p. 223.</ref> The outlook of the American cause was bleak; the army had dwindled to fewer than 5,000 men, and would be reduced further when the enlistments expired at the end of the year.<ref>Schecter, pp. 266–267</ref> Popular support wavered, morale ebbed away, and Congress abandoned ].<ref name="Fischer, pp. 138–142">Fischer, pp. 138–142</ref> Loyalist activity surged in the wake of the American defeat, especially in New York.<ref name="American History 1982 p. 130"/>
{{Main|New York and New Jersey campaign}}
{{Further|Battle of Fort Washington|Battle of Long Island}}


], connecting ] and ], to isolate ] in the ] in November 1776.]]
]'s famous 1851 depiction of '']'']]


After regrouping at ] in Nova Scotia,<ref name="86AtO">], pp. 78–76</ref> Howe set sail for ] in June 1776 and began landing troops on ] near the entrance to ] on July 2. The Americans rejected Howe's informal attempt to negotiate peace on July 30;<ref name="fu3mC">]&nbsp;, p. 104</ref> Washington knew that an attack on the city was imminent and realized that he needed advance information to deal with disciplined British regular troops.
News of the campaign was well received in Britain; festivities took place in London, and public support reached a peak.<ref>{{cite book|author=Lecky|title=A History of England|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m3cUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA70|pages=70–78}}</ref><ref name="m195">{{Harvnb|McCullough|2006|p=195}}.</ref> William Howe was awarded the ] by the King. The successes led to predictions that the British could win within a year.<ref>Ketchum (1973), p. 191, 269</ref> The American defeat revealed Washington's strategic deficiencies, such as dividing a numerically weaker army in the face of a stronger one, his inexperienced staff misreading the situation, and his poorly-trained troops, who fled in disorder when fighting began.<ref>Charles Francis Adams, "The Battle of Long Island," ''American Historical Review'' Vol. 1, No. 4 (Jul. 1896), pp. 650–670 </ref> In the meantime, the British entered ], and were in a good place to resume campaigning.<ref>Schecter, pp. 259–263</ref>


On August 12, 1776, Patriot ] was ordered to form an elite group for reconnaissance and secret missions. ], which included ], became the Army's first intelligence unit.<ref name="mgY85">], p. 61</ref>{{Efn|To learn when and where the attack would occur Washington asked for a volunteer among the Rangers to spy on activity behind enemy lines in ]. Young ] stepped forward, but he was only able to provide Washington with nominal intelligence at that time.<ref name="FLQKA">], p. 134</ref> On September 21, Hale was recognized in a ] tavern, and was apprehended with maps and sketches of British fortifications and troop positions in his pockets. Howe ordered that he be summarily hung as a spy without trial the next day.<ref name="lFweM">], Chap. 11</ref>}} When Washington was driven off ], he soon realized that he would need to professionalize military intelligence. With aid from ], Washington launched the six-man ].<ref name="Baker 2014, Chap.12">], Chap. 12</ref>{{Efn|Tallmadge's cover name became John Bolton, and he was the architect of the spy ring.<ref name="Baker 2014, Chap.12" />}} The efforts of Washington and the Culper Spy Ring substantially increased the effective allocation and deployment of Continental regiments in the field.<ref name="Baker 2014, Chap.12" /> Throughout the war, Washington spent more than 10 percent of his total military funds on ].<ref name="w8uDs">]</ref>
On December 25, 1776, Washington ] the ], and ] the ] garrison at ] the following morning, taking 900 prisoners.<ref>Fischer p. 254—Casualty numbers vary slightly with the Hessian forces, usually between 21–23 killed, 80–95 wounded and 890–920 captured (including the wounded), but it is generally agreed that the casualties were in this area.</ref><ref>Fischer (2004), pp.&nbsp;206–59.</ref> The decisive victory rescued the army's flagging morale, and gave a new hope to the cause for independence.<ref>{{cite book|last=Wood|first=W. J|title=Battles of the Revolutionary War, 1775–1781|publisher=Da Capo Press|year=1995|isbn=0-306-80617-7}} {{ISBN|0-306-81329-7}} (2003 paperback reprint), p. 72-74</ref> Cornwallis marched to re-take Trenton, though his efforts to this end ] on January 2.<ref>Fischer p. 307</ref><ref>Ketchum p. 286</ref> Washington outmanoeuvred Cornwallis that night, and ] the following day. The victories proved instrumental in convincing the ] and ] that the Americans were worthwhile allies, as well as recovering morale in the army.<ref>Ketchum (1973), pp. 388–389</ref><ref>Schecter, p. 268</ref><ref>McCullough p. 290</ref> Washington entered winter quarters at ] on January 6,<ref>Lengel p. 208</ref> though a ].<ref>Fischer (2004), pp.&nbsp;345–58.</ref> While encamped, Howe made no attempt to attack, much to Washington's amazement.<ref name="Lecky, William 1891 p. 57">Lecky, William, , Vol. IV (1891), p. 57.</ref>


Washington split the Continental Army into positions on ] and across the ] in western Long Island.<ref name="QzdDu">], pp. 89, 381</ref> On August 27 at the ], Howe outflanked Washington and forced him back to ], but he did not attempt to encircle Washington's forces.<ref name="04huq">]&nbsp;, p. 657</ref> Through the night of August 28, Knox bombarded the British. Knowing they were up against overwhelming odds, Washington ordered the assembly of a war council on August 29; all agreed to retreat to Manhattan. Washington quickly had his troops assembled and ferried them across the East River to Manhattan on flat-bottomed ] without any losses in men or ordnance, leaving General ]'s regiments as a rearguard.<ref name="2BFMO">], pp. 184–186</ref>
=== British northern strategy fails (1777–1778) ===
{{Main|Saratoga campaign|Philadelphia campaign}}


Howe met with a delegation from the Second Continental Congress at the September ], but it failed to conclude peace, largely because the British delegates only had the authority to offer pardons and could not recognize independence.<ref name="4FsKF">], pp. 165–166</ref> On September 15, Howe seized control of New York City when the British ] and unsuccessfully engaged the Americans at the ] the following day.<ref name="5YPyI">], pp. 102–107</ref> On October 18, Howe failed to encircle the Americans at the ], and the Americans withdrew. Howe declined to close with Washington's army on October 28 at the ] and instead attacked a hill that was of no strategic value.<ref name="baDUW">], pp. 102–111</ref>
]" shows General ] in front of a French ] 4-pounder.]]


Washington's retreat isolated his remaining forces and the British captured ] on November 16. The British victory there amounted to Washington's most disastrous defeat with the loss of 3,000 prisoners.<ref name="iikrS">]&nbsp;, pp. 111, 130</ref> The remaining American regiments on Long Island fell back four days later.<ref name="ImjPu">], pp. 109–125</ref> General ] wanted to pursue Washington's disorganized army, but he was first required to commit 6,000 troops to capture ], to secure the Loyalist port.<ref name="uekYy">], p. 122</ref>{{Efn|The American prisoners were subsequently sent to the ] in the ], where more American soldiers and sailors died of disease and neglect than died in every battle of the war combined.<ref name="YCPdp">], pp. 61, 131</ref>}} General ] pursued Washington, but Howe ordered him to halt.<ref name="1TXji">], pp. 22–23</ref>
In December 1776, ] returned to London to set strategy with ]. Burgoyne's plan was to establish control of the ]-]-] route from New York to Quebec, isolating New England.<ref name="K84">], p. 84</ref> Efforts could then be concentrated on the southern colonies, where it was believed Loyalist support was in abundance.<ref>{{cite book |author1=John Martin Carroll |author2=Colin F. Baxter |title=The American Military Tradition: From Colonial Times to the Present |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UMuKtxqRH8wC&pg=PA14 |year=2007 |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |page=14}}</ref> Howe instead argued capturing ] and defeating Washington was a priority.<ref name="Ketchum, 1999 p. 81">Ketchum, ''Saratoga'' (1999), p. 81</ref> Germain approved this plan, leaving Howe unable to assist Burgoyne.<ref name="Martin, p. 11-15">Martin, p. 11-15</ref> Washington himself was baffled by Howe's choices.<ref name="John E 2010">], ''The First of Men: A Life of George Washington'' (2010) p.</ref> Alden argues Howe was influenced by the idea that, upon success, he would not receive credit, but Burgoyne.<ref name="Alden, 1954 p. 118">Alden, ''The American Revolution'' (1954) p. 118</ref> Controversy persists over whether Germain approved Burgoyne's plan after reading Howe's, and whether he shared this information with his subordinates.<ref name="K84"/><ref name="Griffith">Samuel B. Griffith, ''The War for American Independence: From 1760 to the Surrender at Yorktown in 1781''</ref><ref name="K104"/> Howe was not given any explicit orders to assist Burgoyne, however, a copy Germain sent to Quebec explicitly stated Howe was to assist Burgoyne's efforts.<ref>Martin, p. 11</ref><ref>Fisher, Sydney George. Vol. II (1908) pp. 73–74</ref> Another letter stated Howe should launch his campaign against Philadelphia as intended, while allowing enough time to assist Burgoyne.<ref name="K104">], p. 104</ref> Black argues Germain either left his generals too much latitude, or without a clear direction.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Black |first=Jeremy |title=War for America: The Fight for Independence, 1775–1783 |publisher=St. Martin's Press |location=New York |year=1991 |isbn=0-312-06713-5 |ref=Black}}, p. 126</ref>


The outlook following the defeat at Fort Washington appeared bleak for the American cause. The reduced Continental Army had dwindled to fewer than 5,000 men and was reduced further when enlistments expired at the end of the year.<ref name="U9aPa">], pp. 266–267</ref> Popular support wavered, and morale declined. On December 20, 1776, the Continental Congress abandoned the revolutionary capital of Philadelphia and moved to ], where it remained until February 27, 1777.<ref name="SpAkV">], pp. 138–142</ref> Loyalist activity surged in the wake of the American defeat, especially in ].<ref name="kPQRy">], p. 139</ref>
Burgoyne's plan was to lead an army along ], while a strategic diversion advanced along the ], and both would rendezvous at ].<ref>Ketchum (1997), p.&nbsp;84.</ref> Burgoyne set out on June 14, 1777, ] on July 5. The hasty withdrawal of the Continental Army after little resistance outraged the American public.<ref>Pancake (1977), p.125</ref> Burgoyne's pursuit ran into stiff resistance at ] and ]. Leaving 1,300 men behind as a garrison, Burgoyne continued the advance.<ref name="Nickerson146_57_438">], pp. 146–157, 438</ref> Progress was slow; the Americans blocked roads, destroyed bridges, dammed streams and ] of food.<ref name="K249">], p. 244-249</ref> Meanwhile, ] diversionary column ]. St. Ledger withdrew to Quebec on August 22 after his ].<ref name="Pancake145">Pancake (1977), p. 145</ref><ref name="N271_5">], pp. 271–275</ref> On August 16, a British foraging expedition was ], and more than 700 troops were captured.<ref>{{Cite book|title=The Battle of Bennington: Soldiers and Civilians|first=Michael P.|last=Gabriel|publisher=The History Press|year=2012|isbn=978-1609495152}}</ref> As a result of the defeat, the vast majority of Burgoyne's Indian support abandoned him.<ref>Ketchum (1997), pp.&nbsp;285–323.</ref> Meanwhile, Howe informed Burgoyne he would launch his campaign on Philadelphia as planned, and would be unable to render aid.<ref name="K283">], p. 283</ref>


In London, news of the victorious Long Island campaign was well received with festivities held in the capital. Public support reached a peak.<ref name="sCNCR">], p. 195</ref> Strategic deficiencies among Patriot forces were evident: Washington divided a numerically weaker army in the face of a stronger one, his inexperienced staff misread the military situation, and American troops fled in the face of enemy fire. The successes led to predictions that the British could win within a year.<ref name="bCOlv">]&nbsp;, pp. 650–670</ref> The British established winter quarters in the New York City area and anticipated renewed campaigning the following spring.<ref name="w14iW">], pp. 259–263</ref>
Having considered his options, Burgoyne decided to continue the advance.<ref>Nickerson (1967), pp.&nbsp;296.</ref> On September 19, he attempted to flank the American position, and ]. The British won, but at the cost of 600 casualties. Burgoyne then ], but suffered a constant haemorrhage of deserters, and critical supplies were running low.<ref>Ketchum (1997), pp.&nbsp;337–378.</ref> Henry Clinton did ] on October 6 to divert American resources, though he turned back ten days later.<ref>Nickerson (1967), pp.&nbsp;343–405.</ref> Meanwhile, the American army was growing in size daily,<ref>Nickerson (1967), pp.&nbsp;327.</ref> swelling to some 15,000 men.<ref>{{Cite book |title=Saratoga: A Military History of the Decisive Campaign of the American Revolution |first=John F |last=Luzader |ref=Luzader |location=New York |publisher=Savas Beatie |isbn=978-1-932714-44-9}} pp.&nbsp;249.</ref> On October 7, a British ] against the American lines was ]. Burgoyne then withdrew with the Americans in pursuit, and by October 13, he was surrounded. With no hope of relief and supplies exhausted, Burgoyne surrendered on October 17. 6,222 soldiers became ].<ref>Ketchum (1997), pp.&nbsp;403–425.</ref> The decisive success spurred France to ] as an ], securing the final elements needed for victory over Britain, that of foreign assistance.<ref>Edmund Morgan, The Birth of the Republic: 1763–1789 (1956) pp 82–83</ref><ref>Higginbotham (1983), pp. 188–98</ref>


===Patriot resurgence===
] and ] inspect the troops at ].]]
{{Further|George Washington's crossing of the Delaware River|Battle of Trenton|Battle of Princeton}}
]'', an iconic 1851 ] portrait depicting ]]]
], the last U.S. president to fight in the Revolutionary War as a ] officer, took part in the ] and the ] alongside ]]]


On the night of December 25–26, 1776, Washington ], leading a column of Continental Army troops from today's ], to today's ], in a logistically challenging and dangerous operation.
Meanwhile, Howe launched his campaign against Washington, though his ] to bring him to battle in June 1777 failed.<ref>Stedman, Charles, (1794), pp. 287–89.</ref> Howe declined to attack Philadelphia overland via ], or by sea via the ], even though both options would have enabled him to assist Burgoyne if necessary. Instead, he took his army on a time-consuming route through the ], leaving him completely unable to assist Burgoyne. This decision was so difficult to understand, Howe's critics accused him of treason.<ref name="Campaign of 1777">Adams, Charles Francis. ''Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society, Volume 44'' (1910–11) pp. 25–26</ref>


Meanwhile, the Hessians were involved in numerous clashes with small bands of Patriots and were often aroused by false alarms at night in the weeks before the actual ]. By Christmas they were tired, while a heavy snowstorm led their commander, Colonel ], to assume no significant attack would occur.<ref>], p. 122</ref> At daybreak on the 26th, the American Patriots surprised and overwhelmed Rall and his troops, who lost over 20 killed including Rall,<ref>], pp. 248, 255</ref> while 900 prisoners, German cannons and supplies were captured.<ref name="QceAB">], pp. 206–208, 254</ref>
Howe ] on September 11, though he failed to follow-up on the victory and destroy his army.<ref name="Higginbotham pp. 181">Higginbotham, The War of American Independence, pp. 181–86</ref><ref name="Adams, Charles Francis p. 43">Adams, Charles Francis. , ''Massachusetts Historical Society'', Vol. 44 (1910–11), p. 43.</ref> A ] left Philadelphia defenceless, and Howe captured the city unopposed on September 26. Howe then moved 9,000 men to ], north of Philadelphia.<ref>Ward, Christopher. ''The War of the Revolution''. (2 volumes. New York: Macmillan, 1952.) History of land battles in North America., p. 362</ref> Washington ] on Howe's garrison on October 4, which was eventually repulsed.<ref>Stephen R. Taaffe, ''The Philadelphia Campaign, 1777–1778'' (2003), pp. 95–100 </ref> Again, Howe did not follow-up on his victory, leaving the American army intact and able to fight.<ref name="books.google.co.uk">Rose, Michael (2007), Washington's War: From Independence to Iraq, , Retrieved on May 24, 2017</ref> Later, after ] American defences at White Marsh, Howe inexplicably ordered a retreat to Philadelphia, astonishing both sides.<ref name="McGuire, p. 254">McGuire, p. 254</ref> Howe ignored the vulnerable American rear, where an attack could have deprived Washington of his baggage and supplies.<ref>{{cite book|last=Cadwalader|first=Richard McCall|title=Observance of the One Hundred and Twenty-third Anniversary of the Evacuation of Philadelphia by the British Army. Fort Washington and the Encampment of White Marsh, November 2, 1777:|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kWhar7AYIwAC&pg=PA20|year=1901|pages=20–28|accessdate=January 7, 2016}}</ref> On December 19, Washington's army entered winter quarters at ]. Poor conditions and supply problems resulted in the deaths of some 2,500 troops.<ref>], p. 1-30</ref> Howe, only 20 miles (32&nbsp;km) away, made no effort to attack, which critics observed could have ended the war.<ref name="Noel Fairchild Busch 1974">Noel Fairchild Busch, ''Winter Quarters: George Washington and the Continental Army at Valley Forge'' (Liveright, 1974).</ref><ref name="A Concluding Commentary"> ''Supplying Washington's Army'' (1981).</ref><ref name="history.army.mil"> ''American Military History'' Volume I (2005).</ref>


The Battle of Trenton restored the American army's morale, reinvigorated the Patriot cause,<ref name="mjfFg">], pp. 72–74</ref> and dispelled their fear of what they regarded as Hessian "mercenaries".<ref name="yIUgZ">], p. 416</ref> A British attempt to retake Trenton was repulsed at ] on January 2;<ref name="GGEem">], p. 307</ref> during the night, Washington outmaneuvered Cornwallis, then defeated his rearguard in the ] the following day. The two victories helped convince the French that the Americans were worthy military allies.<ref name="G2skh">], p. 290</ref>
The Continental Army was put through a new training program, supervised by ], introducing the most modern ] methods of drilling.<ref>Paul Douglas Lockhart, ''The Drillmaster of Valley Forge: The Baron de Steuben and the Making of the American Army'' (2008).</ref> Meanwhile, Howe resigned, and was replaced by Henry Clinton on May 24, 1778.<ref name="Frances H. Kennedy 2014 163">{{cite book|author=Frances H. Kennedy|title=The American Revolution: A Historical Guidebook|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rTSTAwAAQBAJ&pg=PA163|year=2014|publisher=Oxford UP|page=163}}</ref> Clinton received orders to abandon Philadelphia and fortify New York following France's entry into the war. On June 18, the British departed Philadelphia, with the reinvigorated Americans in pursuit.<ref name="vafo">Text incorporated from website, which is in the public domain.</ref> The two armies ] on June 28, with the Americans holding the field, greatly boosting morale and confidence.<ref>], p. 70-83</ref> By July, both armies were back in the same positions they had been two years prior.


After his success at Princeton, Washington entered winter quarters at ], where he remained until May<ref name="sZDyW">], p. 208</ref> and received Congressional direction to inoculate all Patriot troops against ].<ref name="4ru2u">], "Writings" v. 7, pp. 38, 130–131</ref>{{efn|The mandate came by way of Benjamin Rush, chair of the Medical Committee. Congress had directed that all troops who had not previously survived smallpox infection be inoculated. In explaining himself to state governors, Washington lamented that he had lost "an army" to smallpox in 1776 by the "Natural way" of immunity.<ref name="fsQm0">], "Writings" v. 7, pp. 131, 130</ref>}} With the exception of a ] between the two armies which continued until March,<ref name="T0TSz">], pp. 345–358</ref> Howe made no attempt to attack the Americans.<ref name="MdrQi">]&nbsp;Vol. 4, p. 57</ref>
=== Foreign intervention ===
{{Main|France in the American Revolutionary War|Spain in the American Revolutionary War|Carlisle Peace Commission}}


===British northern strategy fails===
]]]
{{Further|Saratoga campaign|Philadelphia campaign|Valley Forge}}
] maneuvers and (inset) the ] in September and October 1777]]


The 1776 campaign demonstrated that regaining ] would be a prolonged affair, which led to a change in British strategy to isolating the north by taking control of the ], allowing them to focus on the south where Loyalist support was believed to be substantial.<ref name="RnTHY">], pp. 79–80</ref> In December 1776, Howe wrote to the Colonial Secretary ], proposing a limited offensive against Philadelphia, while a second force moved down the Hudson from Canada.<ref name="FD6xX">], pp. 81–82</ref> Burgoyne supplied several alternatives, all of which gave him responsibility for the offensive, with Howe remaining on the defensive. The option selected required him to lead the main force south from ] down the Hudson Valley, while a detachment under ] moved east from Lake Ontario. The two would meet at ], leaving Howe to decide whether to join them.<ref name="qw8y4">], p. 84</ref> Reasonable in principle, this did not account for the logistical difficulties involved and Burgoyne erroneously assumed Howe would remain on the defensive; Germain's failure to make this clear meant he opted to attack ] instead.<ref name="UlroQ">], pp. 85–86</ref>
The defeat at Saratoga caused considerable anxiety in Britain over foreign intervention. The ] sought ] by consenting to their original demands,<ref>Reid, Authority to Tax, 51.</ref> although ] refused to grant independence.<ref>Stockley (2001), p. 11-12</ref> No positive reply was received from the Americans.<ref>{{cite book|author=Terry M. Mays|title=Historical Dictionary of the American Revolution|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=q3CvVcvmxUQC&pg=PR7|year=2009|publisher=Scarecrow Press|page=7}}</ref>


With a mixed force of British regulars, professional German soldiers and Canadian militia Burgoyne set out on June 14, 1777 and ] on July 5. As General ] retreated, his troops blocked roads, destroyed bridges, dammed streams, and stripped the area of food.<ref name="KjViH">], pp. 244–249</ref> This slowed Burgoyne's progress and forced him to send out large foraging expeditions; one of more than 700 British troops were captured at the ] on August 16.<ref name="BNFDD">], p. x</ref> St Leger moved east and besieged ]; despite defeating an American relief force at the ] on August 6, Burgoyne was abandoned by his Indian allies and withdrew to Quebec on August 22.<ref name="SzR6M">], p. 332</ref> Now isolated and outnumbered by Gates, Burgoyne continued onto Albany rather than retreating to Fort Ticonderoga, reaching ] on September 13. He asked Clinton for support while constructing defenses around the town.<ref name="VbMeB">], pp. 337–339</ref>
] the ] was strongly ],<ref name="crucible">{{cite book | last = Jones | first = Howard | authorlink = | coauthors = | title = Crucible of Power: A History of American Foreign Relations to 1913 | publisher = Scholarly Resources Inc. | year = 2002 | location = | pages = 5 | url = https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&id=TFyLOUrdGFwC&dq=crucible+of+power&printsec=frontcover&source=web&ots=R5McHMJ2SJ&sig=-Q3JyWkBZhwvwE9HDCiUfWf8oJ8&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result#PPP1,M1 | doi = | id = | isbn = 0-8420-2916-8}}</ref> and he sought a '']'' to go to war with and weaken their perennial foe following the ] in 1763.<ref>Hoffman, Ronald, and Peter J. Albert, eds. Diplomacy and Revolution: The Franco-American Alliance of 1778 (United States Capitol Historical Society, 1981)</ref> The French had ] the Americans through neutral ] ports since the onset of the war,<ref name="crucible" /> proving invaluable throughout the Saratoga campaign.<ref>"Journal of the American Revolution, The Gunpowder shortage'' (September 9, 2013).</ref><ref>], , p.8–9 in ], Ed. ''The American Secretaries of State and their diplomacy'' V.1–2, 1963.</ref><ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.nps.gov/spar/historyculture/french-field_4pdr.htm |title=Springfield Armory |publisher=Nps.gov |date=April 25, 2013 |accessdate=May 8, 2013}}</ref> The French public favored war, though Vergennes and ] ] were hesitant, owing to the military and financial risk.<ref>{{cite book|author=Georges Édouard Lemaître|title=Beaumarchais|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZlxAFMQs4kYC&pg=PA229|year= 2005|publisher=Kessinger Publishing|page=229}}</ref> The American victory at Saratoga convinced the French that supporting the Patriots was worthwhile,<ref>{{cite book|author=Thomas G. Paterson|title=American Foreign Relations, Volume 1: A History to 1920|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9-alDgRk-IYC&pg=PA13|year= 2009|publisher=Cengage Learning|pages=13–15|display-authors=etal}}</ref> but doing so also brought major concerns. The King was concerned that Britain's concessions would be accepted, and that she would then reconcile with the Colonies to strike at French and Spanish possessions in the ].<ref name="France In The Revolution">Perkins, James Breck, (1911).</ref><ref name="archive.org">Corwin, Edward Samuel, (1916), pp. 121–48.</ref> To prevent this, France ] the United States on February 6, 1778 and followed with a ]. France aimed to expel Britain from the ], end restrictions on ] sovereignty, regain ] in India, recover ] and ], and restore the ] provisions pertaining to Anglo-French trade.<ref>{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Morris|first=Richard B.|title=The Peacemakers: The Great Powers and American Independence|url=|year=1983|origyear=1965}}, p. 15</ref><ref>{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Renaut|first=Francis P.|title=Le Pacte de famille et l’Amérique: La politique coloniale franco-espagnole de 1760 à 1792|location=Paris|url=|year=1922}}, p. 290</ref>


Morale among his troops rapidly declined, and an unsuccessful attempt to break past Gates at the ] on September 19 resulted in 600 British casualties.<ref name="xIkVK">], pp. 368–369</ref> When Clinton advised he could not reach them, Burgoyne's subordinates advised retreat; a ] on October 7 was repulsed by Gates at the ], forcing them back into Saratoga with heavy losses. By October 11, all hope of British escape had vanished; persistent rain reduced the camp to a "squalid hell" and supplies were dangerously low.<ref name="MRVwq">], pp. 238–239</ref> Burgoyne capitulated on October 17; around 6,222 soldiers, including German forces commanded by General ], surrendered their arms before being taken to Boston, where they were to be transported to England.<ref name="G36uo">], pp. 421–424</ref>
] was wary of provoking war with Britain before she was ready, so she covertly supplied the Patriots via her colonies in ].<ref>{{cite book | last= Caughey |first= John W. |title= Bernardo de Gálvez in Louisiana 1776–1783 | location=Gretna| publisher= Pelican Publishing Company | year=1998 | isbn=1-56554-517-6}}, p. 87</ref><ref>{{cite news | last = Mitchell | first = Barbara A. | title = America's Spanish Savior: Bernardo de Gálvez | newspaper = MHQ (Military History Quarterly) | pages = 98–104 | date = Autumn 2012 | url = http://www.historynet.com/americas-spanish-savior-bernardo-de-galvez.htm}}, p. 99</ref> Congress hoped to persuade Spain into an open alliance, so the first American Commission met with the ] in 1776.<ref>{{cite book | title=Spain's Support Vital to United States Independence, 1777–1783 | publisher=United States. Dept. of Defense | author=E. Chavez, Thomas | year=1997 | pages=United States}}</ref> Spain was still reluctant to make an early commitment, owing to a lack of direct French involvement, the threat against their ], and the possibility of war with ], Spain's neighbor and a ].<ref>{{cite book | last= Sparks |first= Jared |title= The Diplomatic Correspondence of the American Revolution | location=Boston| publisher= Nathan Hale and Gray & Bowen | year=1829–1830}}, p. 1:408</ref> However, Spain affirmed its desire to support the Americans the following year, hoping to weaken Britain's empire.<ref>{{cite book | last= Fernández y Fernández |first= Enrique |title= Spain's Contribution to the independence of the United States | publisher= Embassy of Spain: United States of America | year=1885}}, p. 4</ref> In the ], the Portuguese threat was neutralized. On 12 April 1779, Spain signed the ] with France and went to war against Britain.<ref>Clarfield, Gerard. United States Diplomatic History: From Revolution to Empire. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, 1992.</ref> Spain sought to recover ] and ] in Europe, as well as ] and ] in Florida, and also to expel the British from ].<ref>{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Stockley|first=Andrew|title=Britain and France at the Birth of America: The European Powers and the Peace Negotiations of 1782–1783|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mHoaiPKTKvwC|accessdate=28 August 2015|date=1 January 2001|publisher=University of Exeter Press|isbn=978-0-85989-615-3}}, p. 19</ref><ref>{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Chartrand|first=René|title=Gibraltar 1779–83: The Great Siege|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qMEsAbT-eRUC|accessdate=16 November 2015|year=2006|publisher=Osprey Publishing|isbn=978-1-84176-977-6}}, p. 9</ref>


After securing additional supplies, Howe made another attempt on Philadelphia by landing his troops in ] on August 24.<ref name="V3zgZ">], pp. 317–319</ref> He now compounded failure to support Burgoyne by missing repeated opportunities to destroy his opponent: despite defeating Washington at the ] on September 11, he then allowed him to withdraw in good order.<ref name="lgid0">], p. 43</ref> After dispersing an American detachment at ] on September 20, Cornwallis occupied Philadelphia on September 26, with the main force of 9,000 under Howe based just to the north at ].<ref name="IMKqn">], pp. 361–362</ref> Washington ] on October 4, but was repulsed.<ref name="LEStg">], pp. 95–100</ref>
Meanwhile, George III had given up on subduing America while Britain had a European war to fight.<ref>{{cite book|author=John Ferling|title=Almost a Miracle: The American Victory in the War of Independence|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lyjjEsqlqo0C&pg=PA294|year=2007|publisher=Oxford UP|page=294}}</ref> He did not welcome war with France, but he believed that Britain had made all necessary steps to avoid it and cited the ] in the Seven Years' War as a reason to remain optimistic.<ref>Syrett (1998), p. 17</ref> Britain tried in vain to find a powerful ally to engage France, leaving it isolated,<ref name="Scott 1990">{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Scott|first=Hamish M.|title=British Foreign Policy in the Age of the American Revolution|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kndnAAAAMAAJ|year=1990|publisher=Clarendon Press|isbn=978-0-19-820195-3}}, p. 264-72</ref> preventing Britain from focusing the majority of her efforts in one ],<ref name="Cf., Richard Pares, 1936: 429–65">Cf., Richard Pares, (1936): 429–65</ref><ref>{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Syrett|first=David|title=The Royal Navy in European Waters During the American Revolutionary War|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eEfsS5QKeFQC|year=1998|publisher=Univ of South Carolina Press|isbn=978-1-57003-238-7}}, p. 18</ref> and forcing a major diversion of military resources from America.<ref name="Ketchum 1997, p. 405–448">Ketchum (1997), p. 405–448</ref><ref name="Higginbotham 1983, pp. 175–88">Higginbotham (1983), pp. 175–88</ref> Despite this, the King determined never to recognize American independence and to ravage the colonies indefinitely, or until they pleaded to return to the yoke of the Crown.<ref>Trevelyan (1912), vol.&nbsp;1, p.&nbsp;4., p.&nbsp;5.</ref> ] argues that Britain's attempt to fight in multiple theaters simultaneously without major allies was fundamentally flawed, citing impossible mutual support, exposing the forces to ].<ref name="Alfred Thayer Mahan 1890 p. 534">Alfred Thayer Mahan, The Influence of Sea Power upon History, 1660–1783 (Boston:Little, Brown, 1890), p. 534</ref>


To prevent Howe's forces in Philadelphia being resupplied by sea, the Patriots erected ] and nearby ] on the east and west banks of the Delaware respectively, and placed ] in the river south of the city. This was supported by a small flotilla of ] ships on the Delaware, supplemented by the ], commanded by ]. An attempt by the Royal Navy to take the forts in the October 20 to 22 ] failed;<ref name="75GN3">], pp. 148–155</ref><ref name="mcgeorge5">], pp. 4–8</ref> a second attack captured Fort Mifflin on November 16, while Fort Mercer was abandoned two days later when Cornwallis breached the walls.<ref name="OKOhj">], p. 20</ref> His supply lines secured, Howe tried to tempt Washington into giving battle, but after inconclusive skirmishing at the ] from December 5 to 8, he withdrew to Philadelphia for the winter.<ref name="Hlf4h">], p. 22</ref>
Since the outbreak of the conflict, Britain had appealed to her ally, the neutral Dutch Republic, to loan her the use of the Scots Brigade for service in America, but pro-American sentiment among the Dutch public forced them to deny the request.<ref>{{Harvnb|Edler|2001|pp=28–32}}</ref> Consequently, the British attempted to invoke several treaties for outright Dutch military support, but the Republic still refused. Moreover, American troops were being supplied with ordnance by Dutch merchants via their ].<ref>{{Harvnb|Edler|2001|pp=42–62}}</ref> French supplies bound for America had also passed through Dutch ports.<ref name="crucible" /> The Republic maintained free trade with France following France's declaration of war on Britain, citing a ] by Britain on this issue. Britain responded by confiscating Dutch shipping, and ] upon it. Consequently, the Republic joined the ] to enforce their neutral status.<ref>{{Harvnb|Edler|2001|pp=95–138}}</ref> The Republic had also given sanctuary to American privateers<ref>{{Harvnb|Edler|2001|pp=62–69}}</ref> and had drafted a treaty of commerce with the Americans. Britain argued that these actions contravened the Republic's neutral stance and declared war in December 1780.<ref>{{Harvnb|Edler|2001|pp=88–91, 151–152, 164}}</ref>


On December 19, the Americans followed suit and entered winter quarters at ]. As Washington's domestic opponents contrasted his lack of battlefield success with Gates' victory at Saratoga,<ref name="fsEEE">], pp. 22, 27</ref> foreign observers such as Frederick the Great were equally impressed with Washington's command at Germantown, which demonstrated resilience and determination.<ref name="KFJ3w">], p. 332</ref> Over the winter, poor conditions, supply problems and low morale resulted in 2,000 deaths, with another 3,000 unfit for duty due to lack of shoes.<ref name="USnEK">], pp. 327–328</ref> However, Baron ] took the opportunity to introduce ] drill and infantry tactics to "model companies" in each Continental Army regiment, who then instructed their home units.<ref name="NPYXp">], p.?{{page?|date=September 2024}}</ref> Despite Valley Forge being only twenty miles away, Howe made no effort to attack their camp, an action some critics argue could have ended the war.<ref name="A Concluding Commentary">], pp. 322, 417–418</ref>
=== International war breaks out (1778–1780) ===
{{Main|France in the American Revolutionary War|Anglo-French War (1778-1783)|Spain in the American Revolutionary War|Second Anglo-Mysore War|Fourth Anglo-Dutch War}}


==== Europe ==== ===Foreign intervention===
{{Main|France in the American Revolutionary War|Spain and the American Revolutionary War|Carlisle Peace Commission}}
] with U.S. warships in European waters with access to ], ], and ] ports]]


Like his predecessors, French foreign minister ] considered the 1763 Peace a national humiliation and viewed the war as an opportunity to weaken Britain. He initially avoided open conflict, but allowed American ships to take on cargoes in French ports, a technical violation of neutrality.<ref name="RQia1">], p. 117</ref> Vergennes persuaded ] to secretly fund a ] to purchase munitions for the Patriots, carried in neutral Dutch ships and imported through ] in the Caribbean.<ref name="7Emll">], pp. 5–6</ref>
Soon after France declared war, French and British fleets ] off ] on 27 July 1778.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Turning Point of the Revolution|first=Hoffman|last=Nickerson|publisher=Kennikat|year=1967 |origyear= 1928|location=Port Washington, NY|oclc=549809|ref=Nickerson}}, p. 412</ref> On 12 April 1779, Spain entered the war, with a primary goal of capturing Gibraltar.<ref>{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Chartrand|first=René|title=Gibraltar 1779–83: The Great Siege|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qMEsAbT-eRUC|accessdate=16 November 2015|year=2006|publisher=Osprey Publishing|isbn=978-1-84176-977-6}}, p. 9</ref> On June 24, Spanish troops under the ] ] to the ].<ref>{{Citation | last = Harvey | first = Robert | title = A Few Bloody Noses: The American War of Independence | place = London | year = 2001|isbn= 0719561418|oclc=46513518}}, p. 385-87</ref> The naval blockade, however, was relatively weak, and the British were able to resupply the garrison.<ref>{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Chartrand|first=René|title=Gibraltar 1779–83: The Great Siege|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qMEsAbT-eRUC|accessdate=16 November 2015|year=2006|publisher=Osprey Publishing|isbn=978-1-84176-977-6}}, p. 37</ref> Meanwhile, a plan was formulated for a ] of the ]. A combination of poor planning, disease, logistical issues and high financial expenditures resulted in the expedition's failure.<ref>{{Citation | last = Selig | first = Robert A | url = http://www.hudsonrivervalley.org/ROCHAMBEAUINCONNECTICUT/Historical.php#5.3 | title = Rochambeau in Connecticut | chapter = 5, sect 3 | publisher = Connecticut Historical Commission | year = 1999 | accessdate = 7 December 2007|display-authors=etal}}.</ref><ref>{{Citation | last = Patterson | first = Alfred Temple | title = The Other Armada: The Franco-Spanish attempt to invade Britain in 1779 | place = Manchester, UK | publisher = Manchester University Press | year = 1960}}, p. 3</ref> However, a diversionary Franco-American squadron under ] did ] on 23 September.<ref name="DANFS">{{cite DANFS|title=Bonhomme Richard|url=http://www.history.navy.mil/danfs/b8/bonhomme_richard-i.htm|accessdate=2 June 2017}}</ref> On 16 January 1780, the Royal Navy under ] scored a ] over the Spanish, weakening the naval blockade of Gibraltar.<ref name="Duffy1992">{{cite book|author=Michael Duffy|title=Parameters of British Naval Power, 1650–1850|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ysC9rOCxGhgC&pg=PA105|accessdate=12 April 2013|year=1992|publisher=University of Exeter Press|isbn=978-0-85989-385-5|page=105}}</ref>


Many Americans opposed a French alliance, fearing to "exchange one tyranny for another", but this changed after a series of military setbacks in early 1776. As France had nothing to gain from the colonies reconciling with Britain, Congress had three choices: making peace on British terms, continuing the struggle on their own, or proclaiming independence, guaranteed by France. Although the Declaration of Independence had wide public support, over 20% of Congressmen voted against an alliance with France.<ref name="m8HfD">], pp. 117–119</ref> Congress agreed to the treaty with reluctance and as the war moved in their favor increasingly lost interest in it.<ref name="Jh722">]</ref>
On 9 August, a Franco-Spanish fleet commanded by ] ] a large British convoy off ], led by ], bound for the West Indies.<ref>Volo, M. James. ''Blue Water Patriots: The American Revolution Afloat'', Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. (2008) {{ISBN|978-0-7425-6120-5}}, p. 77</ref> The defeat was catastrophic for Britain; losing 52 ],<ref>Campbell, Thomas. ''Annals of Great Britain from the ascension of George III to the peace of Amiens, Printed by Mundell and co., for Silvester Doig and Andrew Stirling'' (1811)., p.56</ref><ref>Gordon, William. The history of the rise, progress, and establishment of the Independence of the United States of America, Books for Libraries Press (1969) {{ISBN|978-0-8369-5024-3}}, p. 4</ref> 5 ],<ref>Campbell p.36</ref><ref>Syrett, p.136</ref> 80,000 muskets, equipment for 40,000 troops, 294 ]<ref>Parkinson N, C. The Trade Winds: A Study of British Overseas Trade during the French wars, 1793–1815. Routledge; Reprint edition. {{ISBN|978-0-415-38191-8}}, p.38</ref> and 3,144 men,<ref>Syrett, p. 136</ref> making it one of the most complete naval captures ever made.<ref>The encyclopaedia of London, p.483</ref> The loss was valued at some £1.5 million, or £{{Formatprice|{{inflation|UK|1500000|1780}}}} in today's money, dealing a severe blow to British commerce.<ref>Guthrie, William. A New Geographical, Historical And Commercial Grammar And Present State Of The World.Complete With 30 Fold Out Maps – All Present. J. Johnson Publishing (1808) {{ASIN|B002N220JCC}}, p.354</ref><ref>]. Universal History Americanized, or an Historical View of the World from the Earliest Records to the Nineteenth Century, with a Particular Reference to the State of Society, Literature, Religion, and Form of Government of the United States of America. Vol. VI (1819), p. 184</ref>


Silas Deane was sent to ] to begin negotiations with Vergennes, whose key objectives were replacing Britain as the United States' primary commercial and military partner while securing the ] from American expansion.<ref name="AxPnm">]</ref> These islands were extremely valuable; in 1772, the value of sugar and coffee produced by ] on its own exceeded that of all American exports combined.<ref name="XpW61">] pp. 23–24</ref> Talks progressed slowly until October 1777, when British defeat at Saratoga and their apparent willingness to negotiate peace convinced Vergennes only a permanent alliance could prevent the "disaster" of Anglo-American rapprochement. Assurances of formal French support allowed Congress to reject the Carlisle Peace Commission and insist on nothing short of complete independence.<ref name="LV00I">], pp. 11–14</ref>
], 16 January 1780 by Francis Holman, painted 1780]]


On February 6, 1778, France and the United States signed the ] regulating trade between the two countries, followed by a defensive military alliance against Britain, the ]. In return for French guarantees of American independence, Congress undertook to defend their interests in the West Indies, while both sides agreed not to make a separate peace; conflict over these provisions would lead to the 1798 to 1800 ].<ref name="Jh722" /> ] was invited to join on the same terms but refused, largely due to concerns over the impact of the Revolution on Spanish colonies in the Americas. Spain had complained on multiple occasions about encroachment by American settlers into ], a problem that could only get worse once the United States replaced Britain.<ref name="cLbUe">{{Cite web |last=Renouf |first=Stephen |title=Spain in the American Revolution |url=https://members.sar.org/media/uploads/pages/309/TJx3jcf0O6up.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://members.sar.org/media/uploads/pages/309/TJx3jcf0O6up.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |access-date=7 December 2020 |website=Spain Society; SAR |publisher=sar.org}}</ref>
==== Americas ====


]'s joint expedition with ] at the ] in August 1778]]
In the Caribbean, intending to damage British trade, the French blockaded the lucrative sugar islands of ] and ].<ref>{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Mirza|first=Rocky M.|title=The Rise and Fall of the American Empire: A Re-Interpretation of History, Economics and Philosophy: 1492–2006|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ubuq0oO-0aIC|accessdate=14 November 2015|year=2007|publisher=Trafford Publishing|isbn=978-1-4251-1383-4}}, p. 185</ref> In order to improve communication among ], and to strike a blow to privateering,<ref>{{cite journal|last=Boromé|first=Joseph|title=Dominica during French Occupation, 1778–1784|journal=The English Historical Review|issue=Volume 884, No. 330|date=January 1969|jstor=562321|pages=36–58}}</ref> French troops led by the ] ] on 7 September 1778.<ref>Mirza, p. 185</ref> To monitor the French naval base on ], the British ] a French naval force on 15 December, and ] on 28 December.<ref>Mahan, pp. 429–432</ref> Though both fleets received reinforcements through the first half of 1779, the French under the ] soon enjoyed superiority in the Caribbean, and began capturing British territories;<ref>{{cite book|last=Colomb|first=Philip|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YJbAC0WK7K8C&pg=PA386#v=onepage&f=false|title=Naval Warfare, its Ruling Principles and Practice Historically Treated|publisher=W. H. Allen|year=1895|location=London|oclc=2863262}}, pp. 388–389</ref> seizing ] on 18 June, and ] on 4 July.<ref>Colomb, 389–391</ref> On July 6, having pursued d'Estaing from Grenada, the British fleet under ] was ],<ref>{{cite book|title=Dictionnaire des batailles navales franco-anglaises|first=Jean-Claude|last=Castex|author-link =|publisher=Presses Université Laval|year=2004|isbn=978-2-7637-8061-0|ref=Castex|location=|oclc=|url=|volume=}}, pp. 196–199</ref> the worst loss the Royal Navy had suffered ].<ref>Mahan, pp. 438–439</ref> Naval skirmishes continued until 17 April 1780, when British and French fleets ] off ].<ref>Jaques, Tony (2007) ''Dictionary of Battles and Sieges: F-O''. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group {{ISBN|978-0-313-33538-9}}., p. 638</ref><ref>Sweetman, Jack (1997) ''The great admirals: command at sea, 1587–1945''. Annapolis: Naval Institute Press {{ISBN|978-0-87021-229-1}}., p. 146</ref>


Although Spain ultimately made important contributions to American success, in the ], Charles agreed only to support ] outside America, in return for help in recovering ], ] and ].<ref name="1WkNc">], pp. 145–146</ref> The terms were confidential since several conflicted with American aims; for example, the French claimed exclusive control of the Newfoundland cod fisheries, a non-negotiable for colonies like Massachusetts.<ref name="Zpiql">], p. 146</ref> One less well-known impact of this agreement was the abiding American distrust of 'foreign entanglements'; the U.S. would not sign another treaty with France until their ] agreement of 1949.<ref name="Jh722" /> This was because the US had agreed not to make peace without France, while Aranjuez committed France to keep fighting until Spain recovered Gibraltar, effectively making it a condition of U.S. independence without the knowledge of Congress.<ref name="Sj8Yw">], p. 27</ref>
On the mainland, ], ] of ], had intercepted intelligence the British were planning to invade ], and decided to ].<ref>{{cite book|title=History of Louisiana : The Spanish domination, Volume 3|first=Charles|last=Gayarré|publisher=Widdleton|year=1867|ref=Gayarre|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tXQOAAAAIAAJ|oclc=1855106|location=New York}}, p. 122</ref> Gálvez intended to conquer West Florida, and set out with 670 men on August 27, 1779,<ref>Gayarré, pp. 125–126</ref> though his force was soon swollen to 1,400 by local Native Americans.<ref name="Gayarré, p. 126">Gayarré, p. 126</ref> On 7 September, ] to the Spanish,<ref name="Gayarré, p. 126"/> who then marched on to ], arriving on September 12. After ], the town fell.<ref>Gayarré, p. 129</ref> Leaving a garrison behind, Gálvez returned to New Orleans to recruit additional troops. In early 1780, Gálvez mounted an expedition to take ], setting off with 750 troops on 11 January. Joined by reinforcements from Havana, siege operations commenced on March 1, and ] after a 14-day siege.<ref>{{cite book|title=Colonial Mobile|first=Peter Joseph|last=Hamilton|publisher=Houghton Mifflin|year=1897|ref=Hamilton|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=B0sUAAAAYAAJ|oclc=9296191}}, p. 255</ref> Gálvez had hoped to push on to ], the British capital of West Florida, however, a hurricane devastated his expedition, stalling it till 1781.<ref>{{cite book|title=Archaeology of colonial Pensacola|first=Judith Ann|last=Bense|publisher=University Press of Florida|year=1999|isbn=978-0-8130-1661-0|ref=Bense|location=Gainesville, FL|oclc=40444062}}, p. 36</ref>


To encourage French participation in the struggle for independence, the U.S. representative in Paris, Silas Deane promised promotion and command positions to any French officer who joined the Continental Army. Such as ], whom Congress via Dean appointed a major general,<ref>], p. 298</ref><ref>], pp. 24–25, 30</ref> on July 31, 1777.<ref>], pp. 234–235</ref>
In Central America, the defence of ] was a priority for Spain. The British intended to capture the key fortress of ] and drive the Spanish from the region.<ref>{{cite book|title=Spain and the Independence of the United States: An Intrinsic Gift|first=Thomas E|last=Chávez|publisher=UNM Press|year=2004|isbn=978-0-8263-2794-9|ref=Chavez|oclc=149117944}}, p. 151</ref> After inadequate first attempts, 1,200 British troops led by ] arrived on 16 October, and ] on 20 October.<ref>Chávez, p. 152</ref> However, the British suffered terribly due to disease, and were forced to abandon the fort on 29 November,<ref>Chávez, p. 153</ref> and Spanish troops subsequently reoccupied the fort.<ref>Chávez, p. 158</ref> In 1780, ], ] of Jamaica, planned an expedition to cut New Spain in two, by capturing ], which would subsequently allow them full control of the ].<ref>{{cite book |last= Southey |first= Robert |title=The Life of Horatio Lord Nelson |year=2007 |publisher=Echo Library|location=Teddington, UK |isbn=978-1-4068-3003-3}}, p. 9</ref> The British ], led by John Polson and ], set out on 3 February 1780.<ref name="Southey p.10">Southey p.10</ref> On 17 March, the expedition reached ] and laid siege, capturing it on 29 April.<ref>{{cite book |last= de Saavedra de Sangronis |first= Francisco |authorlink= |author2=Francisco Morales Padrón |title=Diario de don Francisco de Saavedra |volume= |year=2004 |publisher=Universidad de Sevilla |location=Madrid, Spain |isbn=978-84-472-0782-4}}, p. 73</ref> The British were ravaged by disease,<ref>{{cite book |last= Coleman |first= Terry |title=The Nelson Touch: The Life and Legend of Horatio Nelson |year=2004 |publisher=Oxford University Press |location=London, UK |isbn=978-0-19-517322-2}}, p. 32</ref> and were running low on food due to poor logistics.<ref name="Southey p.10"/> The British withdrew on 8 November, the expedition having suffered a decisive defeat;<ref>{{cite book |last= Linebaugh |first= Peter |author2=Rediker, Marcus |title=La hidra de la revolución: marineros, esclavos y campesinos en la historia oculta del Atlántico |year=2005 |publisher=Editorial Critica |location= |isbn=978-84-8432-601-4}}, p. 307</ref> some 2,500 troops had perished, making it the costliest British disaster of the war.<ref>{{cite book |last= Sudgen |first= John |title=Nelson: A Dream of Glory, 1758–1797 |year=2004 |publisher=Holt |location=New York, USA |isbn=0-224-06097-X}}, p. 173</ref>


When the war started, Britain tried to borrow the Dutch-based ] for service in America, but pro-Patriot sentiment led the ] to refuse.<ref name="REc39">]&nbsp;, pp. 28–32</ref> Although the Republic was no longer a major power, prior to 1774 they still dominated the European carrying trade, and Dutch merchants made large profits shipping French-supplied munitions to the Patriots. This ended when Britain ] in December 1780, a conflict that proved disastrous to the Dutch economy.<ref name="2mejD">], pp. 572–573</ref>
] against closely massed British infantry]]


The British government failed to take into account the strength of the American merchant marine and support from European countries, which allowed the colonies to import munitions and continue trading with relative impunity. While well aware of this, the North administration delayed placing the Royal Navy on a war footing for cost reasons; this prevented the institution of an effective blockade.<ref name="vh541">], p. 2</ref> Traditional British policy was to employ European land-based allies to divert the opposition; in 1778, they were diplomatically isolated and faced war on multiple fronts.<ref name="30Yfr">], pp. 18–19</ref>
==== India ====


Meanwhile, George III had given up on subduing America while Britain had a European war to fight.<ref name="BNJcV">], p. 294</ref> He did not welcome war with France, but he held the ] in the Seven Years' War as a reason to believe in ultimate victory over France.<ref name="0Xa9K">], p. 17</ref> Britain subsequently changed its focus into the Caribbean theater,<ref name="bdwF7">], p. 18</ref> and diverted major military resources away from America.<ref name="uPqly">]&nbsp;, pp. 175–188</ref>
After word of ] reached ], the British ] moved quickly to capture French possessions, and took ] after a ] on 19 October 1778.<ref>{{cite book|last=Riddick|first=John F.|title=The History of British India: A Chronology|year=2006|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group}}, p. 23-25</ref> The Company resolved to drive the French out of India entirely,<ref>{{cite book|last=Barua|first=Pradeep|title=The State at War in South Asia|publisher=]|date=2005|isbn=0-8032-1344-1}}, p. 79</ref> capturing the ] port of ] in 1779.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://mahe.gov.in/mws/leftmenupages/history.html|title=History of Mahé |accessdate=2 June 2017}}</ref> Mahé had been under the protection of ], as French ordnance passed through the port to the Mysorean ruler, ]. Tensions were already inflamed due to British support for Malabar rebels against Ali,<ref>{{cite book|last=Almon|first=John|author2=Deberett, John & Stockdale, John|title=The Parliamentary Register; or History of the Proceedings and Debates of the House of Commons|year=1793|publisher=New York Public Library}}, p.56</ref> and the fall of Mahé ].<ref>Cust, Eduard. (1862). "Annals of the Wars of the Eighteenth Century, Compiled from the Most Authentic Histories of the Period" Volume 3, University of Lausanne., p. 222</ref> In July 1780, Ali invaded the ], and ] to ] and ]. A 7,000-strong<ref name="dalrymple_2005">{{cite journal|last=Dalrymple|first=William|title=ASSIMILATION AND TRANSCULTURATION IN EIGHTEENTH-CENTURY INDIA: A Response to Pankaj Mishra|journal=Common Knowledge|date=1 October 2005|volume=11|issue=3|pages=445–485|doi=10.1215/0961754X-11-3-445|url=http://commonknowledge.dukejournals.org/content/11/3/445.citation|accessdate=2 June 2017|authorlink=William Dalrymple (historian)|quote=As late as 1780, following the disastrous British defeat by Tipu Sultan of Mysore at the Battle of Pollilur, 7,000 British men, along with an unknown number of women, were held captive by Tipu in his sophisticated fortress of Seringapatam.}}</ref> Company relief force under ] was ] by the ] on 10 September; thus far the worst defeat suffered by a European army in India.<ref>Ramaswami, N.S. (1984). Political History of Carnatic under the Nawabs. New Delhi: Abhinav Publications. p. 225</ref> Instead of pressing on for a decisive victory against a second Company army at ], Ali renewed the siege at Arcot, capturing it on 3 November. The delay allowed British forces to regroup for campaigning the following year.<ref>Barua, p. 80</ref>


=== Stalemate in the North (1778–1780) === ===Stalemate in the North===
{{Main|Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War after Saratoga|Western theater of the American Revolutionary War}} {{Main|Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War after Saratoga|Western theater of the American Revolutionary War}}


] repulse ] attack at ]]] ] repulsing the British at the ] in June 1780; "Give 'em Watts, boys!"]]


At the end of 1777, Howe resigned and was replaced by Sir Henry Clinton on May 24, 1778; with French entry into the war, he was ordered to consolidate his forces in New York.<ref name="uPqly" /> On June 18, the British departed Philadelphia with the reinvigorated Americans in pursuit; the ] on June 28 was inconclusive but boosted Patriot morale. That midnight, the newly installed Clinton continued his retreat to New York.<ref name="ru2b1">], p. 343</ref> A French naval force under Admiral ] was sent to assist Washington; deciding New York was too formidable a target, in August they launched a combined attack on Newport, with General ] commanding land forces.<ref name="2fC9I">], pp. 77–78</ref> The resulting ] was indecisive; badly damaged by a storm, the French withdrew to avoid risking their ships.<ref name="hGItT">]&nbsp;, pp. 174–176</ref>
Following the British defeat at Saratoga, and the entry of France into the war, Henry Clinton withdrew from Philadelphia, consolidating in New York.<ref name="Higginbotham 1983, pp. 175–88"/> French admiral the Comte d'Estaing had been dispatched to North America in April 1778 to assist Washington, arriving shortly after Clinton withdrew into New York.<ref>Morrissey, p. 77</ref> Concluding New York's defences were too formidable for the French fleet,<ref>{{cite book|last=Daughan|first=George|title=If By Sea: The Forging of the American Navy—from the Revolution to the War of 1812|publisher=Basic Books|year=2011|isbn=978-0-465-02514-5|oclc=701015376|origyear=2008}}, pp.174–175</ref> the Franco-American forces opted to attack Newport.<ref>Morrissey, p. 78</ref> This effort, ], failed after the French opted to withdraw, greatly angering the Americans.<ref>{{cite book|last=Dearden|first=Paul F|title=The Rhode Island Campaign of 1778|publisher=Rhode Island Bicentennial Federation|year=1980|location=Providence, RI|isbn=978-0-917012-17-4|oclc=60041024}}, p.102-106</ref> The war then ground down to a stalemate, with the majority of actions fought as large skirmishes, such as those at ] and ]. In the summer of 1779, the Americans captured British posts at ] and ].<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MIcUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA54|title=Hazard's Register of Pennsylvania: Devoted to the Preservation of Facts and Documents, and Every Kind of Useful Information Respecting the State of Pennsylvania, Volume 4|date=1829|publisher=W.F. Geddes|pages=54}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Eaton|first=Harry|title=Jersey City and its historic sites|publisher=The Woman's Club|year=1899|location=Jersey City, NJ|oclc=6340873}}</ref>


Further activity was limited to British raids on ] and ] in October.<ref name="aNa6z">]</ref> In July 1779, the Americans captured British positions at ] and ].<ref name="g7TYG">], p. 54</ref> Clinton unsuccessfully tried to tempt Washington into a decisive engagement by sending General ] to ].<ref name="Tk2S6">], p. 170</ref> In July, a large American naval operation, the ], attempted to retake ] but was defeated.<ref name="rBeAQ">], p. 149</ref>
In July, Clinton's attempts to coax Washington into a decisive engagement with a ] failed.<ref>{{Cite book|last=Nelson|first=Paul David|title=William Tryon and the course of empire: a life in British imperial service|isbn=978-0-8078-1917-3|year=1990|publisher=UNC Press|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CPtiZBAufk4C&printsec=frontcover}}, p. 170</ref> That month, a large American ] to retake ] resulted in the worst American naval defeat until ] in 1941.<ref>{{cite book|last=Bicheno|first=Hugh|year=2003|title=Redcoats and Rebels: The American Revolutionary War|ref=Bicheno|oclc=51963515|location=London|publisher=Harper Collins|isbn=978-0-00-715625-2}}, p. 149</ref> The high frequency of Iroquois ] compelled Washington to mount a ], destroying a large number of Iroquois settlements, but the effort ultimately failed to stop the raids.<ref>{{cite book| author=Fischer, Joseph R.| title="A Well Executed Failure: The Sullivan campaign against the Iroquois, July–September 1779"| publisher=Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press| date=2007| isbn=978-1-57003-837-2}}</ref><ref>{{cite book| url=https://books.google.com/?id=qEsVAAAAYAAJ&pg=RA1-PA49&dq=%22ann+hupp%22+indian| title=History of Washington County| author=Alfred Creigh| publisher=B. Singerly| date=1871 | page=49}}</ref> During the winter of 1779–80, the Continental Army suffered greater hardships than at Valley Forge.<ref>Tolson, Jay (July 7–14, 2008). How Washington's Savvy Won the Day. U.S. News & World Report.</ref> Morale was poor; public support was being eroded by the long war, the ] was virtually worthless, the army was plagued with supply problems, desertion was common, and, in early 1780, whole regiments mutinied over the conditions.<ref>{{cite journal |last=Flexner |first=James Thomas |authorlink= |coauthors= |date=April 1984 |title= Washington "The Indispensable Man"|volume= |issue= |pages=154 |id= |url= |accessdate= |quote= }}</ref><ref>Ketchum, pp. 8,12</ref>
Persistent ] in New York and Pennsylvania led to the punitive ] from July to September 1779. Involving more than 4,000 patriot soldiers, the ] campaign destroyed more than 40 Iroquois villages and 160,000 bushels (4,000 mts) of ], leaving the Iroquois destitute and destroying the Iroquois confederacy as an independent power on the American frontier. However, 5,000 Iroquois fled to Canada, where, supplied and supported by the British, they continued their raids.<ref name="mffSI">], p. 86</ref><ref name="Soodalter">{{cite web |last1=Soodalter |first1=Ron |title=Massacre & Retribution: The 1779-1780 Sullivan Expedition |url=https://www.historynet.com/massacre-retribution-the-1779-80-sullivan-expedition/ |website=History Net |date=July 8, 2011 |access-date=8 May 2024}}</ref><ref name="National Park Service">{{cite web |title=The Clinton-Sullivan Campaign of 1779 |url=https://www.nps.gov/articles/000/the-clinton-sullivan-campaign-of-1779.htm |website=National Park Service |access-date=8 April 2024}}</ref>


During the winter of 1779–1780, the Continental Army suffered greater hardships than at Valley Forge.<ref name="qGXr7">], "Washington's Savvy Won the Day"</ref> Morale was poor, public support fell away, the ] was virtually worthless, the army was plagued with supply problems, desertion was common, and mutinies occurred in the ] and ] regiments over the conditions.<ref name="Q0VqJ">], pp. 363–380</ref>
]


In 1780, Clinton launched an attempt to re-take New Jersey. On June 7, an invasion of 6,000 men under Hessian general ] met ] from the local militia. Though the British held the field, Knyphausen feared a general engagement with Washington's main army, and withdrew.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Forgotten Victory: The Battle for New Jersey&nbsp;– 1780|first=Thomas|last=Fleming|publisher=Reader's Digest Press|location=New York|year=1973|isbn=0-88349-003-X|ref=Fleminng}}, p. 174-175</ref> A fortnight later, Knyphausen and Clinton decided upon a second attempt, which was ], effectively ending British ambitions in New Jersey.<ref>Fleming, p. 232, 302</ref> Meanwhile, American general ] had ] with the war, and conspired with the British to surrender the key American fortress of ].<ref>{{citation|url=http://www.si.umich.edu/spies/letter-1780july15-code.html|title=July 15, 1780 Benedict Arnold to John André (Code)|journal=Spy Letters of the American Revolution From the Collection of the Clements Collection|accessdate=2017-05-30}}</ref> Arnold's plot was foiled upon the capture of his contact, ], and he escaped to British lines in New York. Though Arnold's reasoning reflected Loyalist opinion, Patriots strongly condemned him.<ref>Willard M. Wallace, Traitorous Hero: The Life and Fortunes of Benedict Arnold (New York: Harper & Brothers, 1954), p. 263, 270</ref> In June 1780, Clinton sent 6,000 men under ] to retake New Jersey, but they were halted by local militia at the ]; although the Americans withdrew, Knyphausen felt he was not strong enough to engage Washington's main force and retreated.<ref name="cUzlf">]&nbsp;, pp. 174–175</ref> A second attempt two weeks later ended in a British defeat at the ], effectively ending their ambitions in New Jersey.<ref name="RoM95">]&nbsp;, pp. 232, 302</ref> In July, Washington appointed ] commander of ]; his attempt to betray the fort to the British failed due to incompetent planning, and the plot was revealed when his British contact ] was captured and executed.<ref name="cmndD">], pp. 340–342</ref> Arnold escaped to New York and switched sides, an action justified in a pamphlet addressed "]"; the Patriots condemned his betrayal, while he found himself almost as unpopular with the British.<ref name="oKXqF">], pp. 376–377</ref>


===War in the South===
West of the ], the war was largely confined to skirmishing and raids. In February 1778, an expedition of militia to destroy British military supplies in settlements along the ] was halted due to adverse weather.<ref>Downes, Council Fires, 211; Nester, Frontier War, 194; Nelson, Man of Distinction, 101.</ref> Later in the year, a ] was undertaken to seize the ] from the British. The Americans captured ] on July 4, and then secured ], although the latter was quickly recaptured by ], the British commander at ]. In early 1779, the Americans counter-attacked by undertaking a risky winter march, and ] of the British at Vincennes, taking Hamilton prisoner.<ref>James, James Alton, ed. ''George Rogers Clark Papers.'' 2 vols. Originally published 1912–1926. Reprinted New York: AMS Press, 1972. {{ISBN|0-404-01556-5}}, p. 144-48</ref><ref>Lowell Hayes Harrison, George Rogers Clark and the War in the West (2001).</ref>

On May 25, 1780, the British launched ], as part of a wider operation to clear resistance from Quebec to the ]. The expedition met with only limited success, though hundreds of settlers were killed or captured.<ref>Grenier, John. ''The First Way of War: American War Making on the Frontier, 1607–1814''. Cambridge University Press, 2005. {{ISBN|0-521-84566-1}}., p. 159. Grenier argues that "The slaughter the Indians and rangers perpetrated was unprecedented."</ref> The Americans responded with a major offensive along the ] in August, which ], but did little to abate the Native American raids on the frontier.<ref>Nelson, Larry L. ''A Man of Distinction among Them: Alexander McKee and the Ohio Country Frontier, 1754–1799.'' Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press, 1999. {{ISBN|0-87338-620-5}} (hardcover). p. 118</ref> An attempt by French militia to capture Detroit ended in disaster when ] ] the gathered troops on November 5.<ref>{{cite book |last=Gaff |first=Alan D. |title=Bayonets in the Wilderness. Anthony Waynes Legion in the Old Northwest. |publisher=University of Oklahoma Press |location=Norman |year=2004 |isbn=0-8061-3585-9}}</ref> The war in the west had become a stalemate; the Americans did not have the manpower to simultaneously defeat the Indian tribes and occupy their land.<ref>Scaggs, David Curtis, ed. ''The Old Northwest in the American Revolution: An Anthology''. Madison: The State Historical Society of Wisconsin, 1977. {{ISBN|0-87020-164-6}}, p. 132</ref>

=== War in the South (1778–1781) ===
{{Main|Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War}} {{Main|Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War}}
] in May 1780]]
] routs the ] at the ] in ], in January 1781]]


The Southern Strategy was developed by Lord Germain, based on input from London-based Loyalists, including Joseph Galloway. They argued that it made no sense to fight the Patriots in the north where they were strongest, while the New England economy was reliant on trade with Britain. On the other hand, duties on tobacco made the South far more profitable for Britain, while local support meant securing it required small numbers of regular troops. Victory would leave a truncated United States facing British possessions in the south, ] to the north, and ] on their western border; with the ] controlled by the ], Congress would be forced to agree to terms. However, assumptions about the level of Loyalist support proved wildly optimistic.<ref name="WmAJ5">], pp. 16–19</ref>
]]]


Germain ordered ], the British commander in ], to advance into ] in December 1778. ], an experienced officer, ] on December 29, 1778. He recruited a Loyalist militia of nearly 1,100, many of whom allegedly joined only after Campbell threatened to confiscate their property.<ref name="oVXIX">], p. 87</ref> Poor motivation and training made them unreliable troops, as demonstrated in their defeat by Patriot militia at the ] on February 14, 1779, although this was offset by British victory at ] on March 3.<ref name="eTiqi">], pp. 46–50</ref>
In 1778, despite the defeat at Saratoga, the British turned their attention to reconquering the South. Prominent Loyalists with great influence in London<ref name="jstor.org">Ritcheson, C.; "Loyalist Influence on British Policy Toward the United States After the American Revolution"; ''Eighteenth-Century Studies''; Vol. 7, No. 1; Autumn, 1973; p. 6. </ref> had convinced the British that Loyalist support was high in the South, and that a campaign there would inspire a popular Loyalist uprising. The British centred their strategy upon this thinking.<ref name="Wickwire p.315">Wickwire; ''Cornwallis, the American Adventure''; p.315.</ref><ref name="clements.umich.edu">, Clinton Papers; Clements Library, University of Michigan.</ref> A southern campaign also had the advantage of keeping the Royal Navy closer to the Caribbean, where it would be needed to defend lucrative colonies against the Franco-Spanish fleets.<ref>Henry Lumpkin, ''From Savannah to Yorktown: The American Revolution in the South'' (2000).</ref>


In June 1779, Prévost launched an abortive assault on Charleston, before retreating to Savannah, an operation notorious for widespread looting by British troops that enraged both Loyalists and Patriots. In October, a joint French and American operation under d'Estaing and General ] failed to ].<ref name="yBaSD">], p. 112</ref> Prévost was replaced by Lord Cornwallis, who assumed responsibility for Germain's strategy; he soon realized estimates of Loyalist support were considerably over-stated, and he needed far more regular forces.<ref name="fDcs9">], pp. 22–23</ref>
On December 29, 1778, an expeditionary corps from New York ]. British troops then moved inland to recruit Loyalist support.<ref>{{cite book|last=Morrill|first=Dan|title=Southern Campaigns of the American Revolution|publisher=Nautical & Aviation Publishing|year=1993|location=Baltimore, MD|isbn=978-1-877853-21-0|oclc=231619453|ref=Morrill}}, p. 46-47</ref> Despite a promising initial turnout in early 1779, a large Loyalist militia was defeated at ] on February 14, demonstrating their vulnerability when operating away from British regulars. The British recovered their loss, defeating Patriot militia at ] on March 3.<ref>Morrill (1993), p. 48-50</ref> The British then launched an ] on ]. The operation was noted for a high degree of looting by British troops, enraging both Loyalists and Patriot colonists.<ref>{{cite book|title=The Southern Strategy: Britain's Conquest of South Carolina and Georgia, 1775–1780|first=David K|last=Wilson|publisher=University of South Carolina Press|year=2005|isbn=1-57003-573-3|location=Columbia, SC|oclc=232001108}}, p. 112</ref> In October, a combined Franco-American effort to ] failed.<ref>Hibbert, C.; Rebels and Redcoats; p. 246</ref> In 1780, Henry Clinton moved against Charleston, ] on May 12. With few losses of their own, the British took 5,266 prisoners,<ref>, The American Revolution in South Carolina</ref> effectively destroying the Continental Army in the south.<ref>John W. Gordon and John Keegan, ''South Carolina and the American Revolution: A Battlefield History'' (2007).</ref><ref>Mackey, The War for America, 1964</ref> Organized American resistance in the region collapsed when ] defeated the withdrawing Americans at ] on May 29.<ref>{{cite book|last=Scoggins|first=Michael C|title=The Day It Rained Militia: Huck's Defeat and the Revolution in the South Carolina Backcountry, May–July 1780|location=Charleston, SC|publisher=The History Press|year=2005|isbn=978-1-59629-015-0|oclc=60189717}}, p. 46</ref>


Reinforced by Clinton, Cornwallis's troops captured Charleston in May 1780, inflicting the most serious Patriot defeat of the war; over 5,000 prisoners were taken and the Continental Army in the south effectively destroyed. On May 29, Lieutenant-Colonel ]'s mainly Loyalist force routed a Continental Army force nearly three times its size under Colonel Abraham Buford at the ]. The battle is controversial for allegations of a massacre, which were later used as a recruiting tool by the Patriots.<ref name="9sQwG">], pp. 4–8</ref>
]


Clinton returned to New York, leaving Cornwallis to oversee the south; despite their success, the two men left barely on speaking terms.<ref name="zCa8T">], pp. 127–128</ref> The Southern strategy depended on local support, but this was undermined by a series of coercive measures. Previously, captured Patriots were sent home after swearing not to take up arms against the king; they were now required to fight their former comrades, while the confiscation of Patriot-owned plantations led formerly neutral "]s" to side with them.<ref name="UE0Rz">], pp. 101–102</ref> Skirmishes at ], Cedar Springs, ], and ] signaled widespread resistance to the new oaths throughout South Carolina.<ref name="eJXda">], pp. 88–92</ref>
Clinton returned to New York, leaving Charles Cornwallis in command in Charleston to oversee the southern war effort. In the interim, the war was carried on by Patriot militias, whom effectively suppressed Loyalists by winning victories in ],<ref>Shelton, Kenneth, ''All That Dare Oppose Them: The Whig Victory at Mobley's Meeting House, June 1780'', (2005)</ref> ],<ref>{{Cite web|url=http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Gazetteer/Places/America/United_States/North_Carolina/_Texts/journals/The_North_Carolina_Booklet/4/2*.html|title=The Battle of Ramsaur's Mill • The North Carolina Booklet 4:2 (1904)|website=penelope.uchicago.edu|access-date=2016-08-24}}</ref> ],<ref name="Michael C. Scoggins 2005">Michael C. Scoggins, The Day It Rained Militia: Huck's Defeat and the Revolution in the South Carolina Backcountry, May–July 1780 (Charleston: The History Press, 2005)</ref> ],<ref>O. C. Stonestreet IV, ''The Battle of Colson's Mill: Death Knell of the Carolina Tories'', (Createspace Publishing, 2014) pp.67–70. {{ISBN|9781499173888}}</ref> and ].<ref name="Michael C. Scoggins 2005"/> Congress appointed ], victor at Saratoga, to lead the American effort in the south. Soon after arriving, on August 16, Gates suffered a ], setting the stage for Cornwallis to invade North Carolina.<ref>Hugh F. Rankin, ''North Carolina in the American Revolution'' (1996).</ref> While Patriot militia continued to interfere in attempts to pacify the countryside, Cornwallis dispatched troops to raise Loyalist forces to cover his left flank as he moved north.<ref>{{cite book |title=The Road To Guilford Court House: The American Revolution in the Carolinas |last=Buchanan |first=John |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |year=1997 |isbn=0-471-32716-6|location=New York }}, p. 202</ref> This wing of Cornwallis' army was ] on October 7, irreversibly breaking Loyalist support in the Carolinas. Cornwallis subsequently aborted his advance and retreated back into South Carolina.<ref name="Buchanan, p. 241">Buchanan, p. 241</ref> In the interim, Washington replaced Gates with his trusted subordinate, ].<ref>Buchanan, p. 275</ref>


In July 1780, Congress appointed Gates commander in the south; he was defeated at the ] on August 16, leaving Cornwallis free to enter North Carolina.<ref name="CR0we">]&nbsp;, p.</ref> Despite battlefield success, the British could not control the countryside and Patriot attacks continued; before moving north, Cornwallis sent Loyalist militia under Major ] to cover his left flank, leaving their forces too far apart to provide mutual support.<ref name="P43ob">], p. 202</ref> In early October, Ferguson was defeated at the ], dispersing organized Loyalist resistance in the region.<ref name="6Dbvn">], pp. 459–461</ref> Despite this, Cornwallis continued into North Carolina hoping for Loyalist support, while Washington replaced Gates with General ] in December 1780.<ref name="MsfX6">], p. 275</ref>
Unable to confront the British directly, Greene dispatched a force under ] to recruit additional troops.<ref>Buchanan, p. 292</ref> Morgan then defeated the ] under Tarleton on January 17, 1781, at ].<ref name="Buchanan, p. 326">Buchanan, p. 326</ref> As after the defeat of the Loyalists at King's Mountain, Cornwallis was criticized for his decision to detach a substantial part of his army without adequate support.<ref name="ReferenceA">Clinton, H.; The American Rebellion; 1783</ref> Despite the setbacks, Cornwallis proceeded to advance into North Carolina, gambling that he would receive substantial Loyalist support.<ref name="clements.umich.edu"/> Greene evaded combat with Cornwallis, instead wearing his army down through a protracted ].<ref>{{cite book | title=George the Third and Charles Fox: The Concluding Part of The American Revolution | first=Sir George Otto | last=Trevelyan | authorlink=Sir George Trevelyan, 2nd Baronet | publisher=Longmans, Green and Co | location=New York and elsewhere | year=1914}}</ref> By March, Greene's army had grown enough where he felt confident in facing Cornwallis. The two armies engaged at ] on March 15, and, though Greene was beaten, Cornwallis' army had suffered irreplaceable casualties.<ref name=MtVernon>{{cite web | url = http://www.mountvernon.org/digital-encyclopedia/article/battle-of-guilford-courthouse/ | title = Battle of Guilford Courthouse | first = Nick | last = McGrath | work = George Washington’s Mount Vernon: Digital Encyclopedia | publisher = Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association | date = | access-date = January 26, 2017 | quote = In three hours, Cornwallis’s army took possession of the field, but it was a Pyrrhic victory.... Cornwallis could not afford the casualties his army sustained, and withdrew to Wilmington. By doing so, Cornwallis ceded control of the countryside to the Continentals.}}</ref> Compounding this, far fewer Loyalists were joining as expected due to effective Patriot suppression.<ref>Lumpkin, ''From Savannah to Yorktown: The American Revolution in the South'' (2000).</ref> Cornwallis' casualties were such that he was compelled to retreat to ] for reinforcement, leaving the interior of the Carolinas, and Georgia, wide open to Greene.


Greene divided his army, leading his main force southeast pursued by Cornwallis; a detachment was sent southwest under ], who defeated Tarleton's ] at ] on January 17, 1781, nearly eliminating it as a fighting force.<ref name="Y8Aqz">], pp. 238–242</ref> The Patriots now held the initiative in the south, with the exception of a ] led by Benedict Arnold in January 1781.<ref name="kFdPt">]&nbsp;, pp. 234–238</ref> Greene led Cornwallis on a series of countermarches around North Carolina; by early March, the British were exhausted and short of supplies and Greene felt strong enough to fight the ] on March 15. Although victorious, Cornwallis suffered heavy casualties and retreated to ], seeking supplies and reinforcements.<ref name="NcMDc">], p. 241</ref>
In Cornwallis' absence, Greene proceeded to reconquer the South. Despite suffering a reversal at ] on April 25,<ref>Greene, Francis Vinton D. ''General Greene'', Appleton and Company 1893, p. 241</ref> American troops continued to dislodge strategic British posts in the area, capturing ],<ref>{{cite book|title=This Destructive War|first=John|last=Pancake|publisher=University of Alabama Press|year=1985|isbn=0-8173-0191-7}}</ref> and ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Founding Fighters: The Battlefield Leaders who Made American Independence|first=Alan|last=C. Cate|publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group|year=2006}}, p. 162</ref> Augusta, the last major British outpost in the South outside of Charleston and Savannah, ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Andrew Pickens: South Carolina Patriot in the Revolutionary War|last=Reynolds, Jr.|first=William R.|year=2012|publisher=McFarland & Company, Inc.|location=Jefferson NC|isbn=978-0-7864-6694-8}}</ref> In an effort to stop Greene, a British force clashed with American troops at ] on September 8. Despite inflicting a tactical defeat on Greene's army, the casualties suffered by the British were such that they withdrew to Charleston.<ref>{{cite book|title=This Destructive War|first=John|last=Pancake|publisher=University of Alabama Press|year=1985|isbn=0-8173-0191-7}}, p. 221</ref> While minor skirmishes in the Carolinas continued till the end of the war, British troops were effectively confined to Charleston and Savannah for the remainder of the conflict.<ref name="ReferenceB">Bicheno, H: Rebels and Redcoats: The American Revolutionary War, London, 2003</ref>


The Patriots now controlled most of the Carolinas and Georgia outside the coastal areas; after a minor reversal at the ], they recaptured ] and ] on April 15.<ref name="Sfu2K">], pp. 234–237</ref> On June 6, Brigadier General ] captured ], leaving the British in Georgia confined to Charleston and Savannah.<ref name="ei9uo">], pp. 255–277</ref> The assumption Loyalists would do most of the fighting left the British short of troops and battlefield victories came at the cost of losses they could not replace. Despite halting Greene's advance at the ] on September 8, Cornwallis withdrew to Charleston with little to show for his campaign.<ref name="Mn9U7">], p. 221</ref>
=== British defeat in America (1781) ===
{{Main|Yorktown campaign}}
]]]


===Western campaign===
Cornwallis had discovered that the majority of the American's supplies in the Carolinas were passing through ], and had written to both Lord Germain and Clinton detailing his intentions to invade. Cornwallis believed a successful campaign there would cut supplies to Greene's army and precipitate a collapse of American resistance in the South. Clinton strongly opposed the plan, instead favoring conducting a campaign further north in the ] region.<ref name="ReferenceC">Cornwallis; An Answer to Sir Henry Clinton's Narrative. Note: Cornwallis wrote this pamphlet shortly after the war in explanation of his actions.</ref> Lord Germain wrote to Cornwallis approving his plan, neglecting to include Clinton in the decision-making entirely, despite him being Cornwallis' superior officer.<ref name="Public Record Office">Cornwallis Correspondence, </ref> Cornwallis then decided to move into Virginia without informing Clinton.<ref>Clinton, H.; ''The American Rebellion''. Note: This lack of notification was one of Clinton's main arguments in his own defense in the controversy that followed the surrender at Yorktown.</ref> Clinton, however, had failed to construct a coherent strategy for British operations in 1781,<ref>{{cite book|last=Grainger|first=John|title=The Battle of Yorktown, 1781: a Reassessment|publisher=Boydell Press|year=2005|location=Woodbridge, NJ|isbn=978-1-84383-137-2|oclc=232006312}}, p. 29</ref> owing to his difficult relationship with his naval counterpart, ].<ref name="Billias 1969">{{cite book|last=Billias|first=George|title=George Washington's Generals and Opponents: their Exploits and Leadership|publisher=Da Capo Press|year=1969|location=New York|isbn=978-0-306-80560-8|oclc=229206429}}, p. 267-275</ref>
{{main|Western theater of the American Revolutionary War}}
] Governor ] surrenders to Colonel ] at ] in July 1779]]


From the beginning of the war, ], the ], allowed the Americans to import supplies and munitions into ], then ship them to ].<ref name="sDaXP">], p. 81</ref> This provided an alternative transportation route for the Continental Army, bypassing the British blockade of the Atlantic Coast.<ref name="T3jCI">], p. 108</ref>
Following the calamitous operations at Newport and Savannah, French planners realized closer cooperation with the Americans was required to achieve success.<ref>{{cite book|last=Dull|first=Jonathan R|title=The French Navy and American Independence: A Study of Arms and Diplomacy, 1774–1787|location=Princeton, NJ|publisher=Princeton University Press|year=1975|ref=Dull|isbn=978-0-691-06920-3|oclc=1500030}}, p. 247-248</ref> The French fleet, led by the ], had received discretionary orders from Paris to assist joint efforts in the north if naval support was needed.<ref>Grainger, p. 40</ref><ref>Dull, p. 241</ref> Washington and his French counterpart, the ], discussed their options. Washington pushed for an attack on New York, while Rochambeau preferred a strike in Virginia, where the British were less well-established and thus, easier to defeat.<ref>Ketchum, p. 139</ref> Franco-American movements around New York caused Clinton a great deal of anxiety, fearing an attack on the city. His instructions to Cornwallis during this time were vague, rarely forming explicit orders. However, Clinton did instruct Cornwallis to establish a fortified naval base, and transfer troops to the north to defend New York.<ref>Grainger, p. 43-44</ref> Cornwallis dug in at ], and awaited the Royal Navy.<ref>Michael Cecere, ''Great Things are Expected from the Virginians: Virginia in the American Revolution'' (2009).</ref>


In February 1778, an expedition of militia to destroy British military supplies in settlements along the ] was halted by adverse weather.<ref name="zrHvB">], p. 194</ref> Later in the year, a ] was undertaken to seize the ] from the British. Virginia militia, '']'' settlers, and Indian allies commanded by Colonel George Rogers Clark captured ] on July 4 and then secured ], though Vincennes was recaptured by Quebec Governor ]. In early 1779, the Virginians counter-attacked in the ] and took Hamilton prisoner. Clark secured western ] as the American Northwest Territory in the ] brought the Revolutionary War to an end.<ref name="A5cfw">], pp. 58–60</ref>
], 1797]]


When Spain joined France's war against Britain in the Anglo-French War in 1779, their treaty specifically excluded Spanish military action in North America. Later that year, however, Gálvez initiated offensive operations against British outposts.<ref name="lGgZh">], p. 170</ref> First, he cleared British garrisons in ], ], ], and ], ], and captured five forts.<ref name="zQHJI">], speech</ref> In doing so, Gálvez opened navigation on the Mississippi River north to the American settlement in Pittsburgh.<ref name="ipFTR">], "Spanish New Orleans helped America"</ref>
Washington still favored an assault on New York, but was essentially overruled when the French opted to send their fleet to their preferred target of Yorktown. In August, the combined Franco-American army moved south to cooperate with de Grasse to defeat Cornwallis.<ref>{{cite book|last=Johnston|first=Henry Phelps|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rWwFAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA34#v=onepage&f=false|title=The Yorktown Campaign and the Surrender of Cornwallis, 1781|location=New York|publisher=Harper & Bros|year=1881|oclc=426009}}, p. 101</ref> Lacking sufficient naval resources to effectively counter the French, the British dispatched an inadequate fleet under ] to assist Cornwallis and assume naval dominance.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Middleton|first=Richard|date=2014|title=Naval Resources and the British Defeat at Yorktown, 1781|url=|journal=The Mariner's Mirror |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=29–43|doi=10.1080/00253359.2014.866373|pmid=|access-date=}}</ref> On September 5, the French fleet ], giving the French control of the seas around Yorktown, cutting Cornwallis off from reinforcements and relief.<ref>{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Duffy|first=Michael|title=Parameters of British Naval Power, 1650–1850|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ysC9rOCxGhgC|accessdate=8 February 2016|year=1992|publisher=University of Exeter Press|isbn=978-0-85989-385-5}}, p. 110</ref> Despite the continued urging of his subordinates,<ref name="Ketchum, p. 205">Ketchum, p. 205</ref> Cornwallis made no attempt to break out and engage the Franco-American army before it had established siege works, instead expecting reinforcements would arrive from New York.<ref>{{cite book|last=Wickwire|first=Franklin and Mary|title=Cornwallis: The American Adventure|location=Boston|publisher=Houghton Mifflin|year=1970|oclc=62690}}, p. 362</ref>


On May 25, 1780, British Colonel Henry Bird ] as part of a wider operation to clear American resistance from ] to the ]. Their advance on New Orleans was repelled by Spanish Governor Gálvez's offensive on ]. Simultaneous British attacks were repulsed on ] by the Spanish Lieutenant Governor ], and on the ] in ], by Lieutenant Colonel Clark. The British initiative under Bird from Detroit was ended at the rumored approach of Clark.{{Efn|Bird's expedition numbered 150 British soldiers, several hundred Loyalists, and 700 Shawnee, Wyandot, and Ottawa auxiliaries. The force skirted into the eastern regions of Patriot-conquered western Quebec that had been annexed as ]. His target was Virginia militia stationed at ]. As they approached downriver on the ], rumor among the natives spread that the feared Colonel Clark had discovered their approach. Bird's natives and Loyalists abandoned their mission 90 miles upriver to loot settlements at the ]. At the surrender of Ruddles Station, safe passage to families was promised, but 200 were massacred by Indian raiders. Grenier maintains that "The slaughter the Indians and rangers perpetrated was unprecedented".}} The scale of violence in the ], was extreme "even for frontier standards." It led to ] and ] settlements, who joined Clark's militia when the British and their hired German soldiers withdrew to the ].<ref name="XfL5Q">], p. 159</ref> The Americans responded with a major offensive along the ] in August which met with some success in the ] but did not end Indian raids.<ref name="nolLI">], p. 118</ref>
On September 28, the Franco-American army ].<ref>Ketchum, p. 214</ref> Believing relief from Clinton was imminent, Cornwallis prematurely abandoned all of his outer defences, which were then occupied by the Franco-American troops, serving to hasten his subsequent defeat.<ref>{{cite book|last=Lengel|first=Edward|authorlink=Edward G. Lengel|title=General George Washington|location=New York|publisher=Random House Paperbacks|year=2005|isbn=0-8129-6950-2|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yHTGAAAACAAJ&dq=General+George+Washington+Lengel}}, p. 337</ref> A British attempt to break out of the siege across the river at ] failed when a storm hit.<ref>{{cite book|last=Davis|first=Burke|title=The Campaign that Won America|location=New York|publisher=HarperCollins|year=2007|isbn=978-0-8368-5393-3}}, p. 237</ref> Under increasing bombardment and with dwindling supplies, Cornwallis and his subordinates agreed their situation was untenable, and negotiated a surrender on October 17.<ref>{{cite book|last=Fleming|first=Thomas|title=The Perils of Peace |location=New York|publisher=The Dial Press|year=1970|isbn=978-0-06-113911-6}}, p. 16</ref> Some 7,685 soldiers became prisoners of the Franco-American army.<ref>Greene, pp. 307–308</ref> The same day as the surrender, 6,000 troops under Clinton had departed New York, sailing to relieve Yorktown.<ref>Ketchum, p. 241</ref><ref>Richard Ferrie, ''The World Turned Upside Down: George Washington and the Battle of Yorktown'' (1999).</ref>


French soldier ] led a Canadian militia in an attempt to capture ], but they dispersed when ] led by ] attacked the encamped settlers on November 5.<ref name="nGyQz">], p. 85</ref>{{Efn|Most Native Americans living in the area remembered the French better than any of the British they had met. Despite the British military nearby, the ] sought to avoid fighting with either Virginian Clark or Frenchman La Balme. On La Balme's horseback advance on Detroit, he paused two weeks to ruin a local French trader and loot surrounding Miami towns. La Balme might have treated them as allies, but he pushed ] into warrior leadership, converting most Miami tribes into British military allies, and launching the military career of one of the most successful opponents of westward settlement over the next 30 years.<ref name="h260W">], pp. 88–89</ref>}} The war in the west stalemated with the British garrison sitting in Detroit and the Virginians expanding westward settlements north of the Ohio River in the face of British-allied Indian resistance.<ref name="b02bR">], p. 132</ref>
=== North Ministry collapses ===


In 1781, Galvez and Pollock ] to secure West Florida, including British-held Mobile and Pensacola.<ref name="COArV">], p. 135</ref> The Spanish operations impaired the British supply of armaments to British Indian allies, which effectively suspended a military alliance to attack settlers between the Mississippi River and the Appalachian Mountains.<ref name="wwErI">], p. 124</ref>{{Efn|Governor Bernardo de Gálvez is only one of eight men made honorary US citizens for his service in the American Cause. see Bridget Bowman (29 December 2014). "Bernardo de Gálvez y Madrid's Very Good Year". Roll Call. The Economist Group. Retrieved April 25, 2020.}}
]]]


In 1782, large scale retaliations between settlers and Native Americans in the region included the ] and the ]. The 1782 ] was one of the last major engagements of the war. News of the treaty between Great Britain and the United States arrived late that year. By this time, about 7% of ] settlers had been killed in battles against Native Americans, contrasted with 1% of the population killed in the Thirteen Colonies. Lingering resentments led to ] after the war officially ended.
Following British successes at Newport and Charleston, the North government had gained support in Parliament.<ref>Rodger, N.A.M. ''Command of the Ocean: A Naval History of Britain 1649–1815,'' (2007), p. 343</ref> However, the government's decision to allow Irish Catholics to enlist in the army<ref name="Lecky 162–65"/> was deeply unpopular, triggering a massive protest in London in 1780, culminating in ].<ref>{{Cite book | publisher = Printed by W. Wilson, for Vernor, Hood, and Sharpe | last = Brayley | first = Edward Wedlake | authorlink=Edward Wedlake Brayley |author2=] |author3=Joseph Nightingale | title = London and Middlesex | year = 1810 }}</ref> The riots were the most destructive in ], damaging the prestige of the government.<ref>http://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/the-gordon-riots-of-1780-london-in-flames-a-nation-in-ruins</ref><ref>Rogers p.152</ref> On 25 November 1781, the situation worsened when news of the surrender at Yorktown arrived in London. Prime Minister Lord North is said to have repeatedly exclaimed; "Oh, God! It's all over!"<ref>{{cite book|last=Hallahan|first=William|title=The Day the Revolution Ended|publisher=John Wiley|year=2004|location=Hoboken, NJ|isbn=0-471-26240-4|oclc=249579015}}, p.249</ref> King George III received the news with dignity, though later became ] and considered ].<ref>Hallahan, p.250</ref> The Whig opposition gained traction in Parliament, though a motion proposed on December 12 to end the war was defeated by only one vote.<ref>Hallahan, p.251</ref>


===British defeat===
], who had overseen strategic matters in the war effort, was dismissed from office in early 1782. Soon after, a ] in the Prime Minister was passed, forcing the resignation of North and leading to the collapse of his ministry.<ref>{{cite book|last=Larrabee|first=Harold A|title=Decision at the Chesapeake|publisher=Clarkson N. Potter|location=New York|year=1964|oclc=426234}}, p. 279-280</ref> The ] came to power soon after and began opening negotiations for peace.<ref>{{cite book|last=Greene|first=Jerome|title=The Guns of Independence: The Siege of Yorktown, 1781|publisher=Savas Beatie|location=New York|year=2005|isbn=1-932714-05-7|oclc=60642656}}, p. 325</ref> Prime Minister the ] died in office on 1 July 1782, and was succeeded by the ], forcing the resignations of prominent Whigs ] and ], with whom Shelburne had an icy relationship.<ref>Fleming, Thomas. The Perils of Peace: America's Struggle for Survival After Yorktown. First Smithsonian books, 2008. p.179-180</ref> Shelburne was initially hesitant to granting full American independence, instead preferring the colonies accept ], though such intentions were never realized.<ref name=www.number10.gov.uk>{{cite web|title=Charles Watson-Wentworth, 2nd Marquess of Rockingham|website=Past Prime Ministers|publisher=UK Government|url=https://www.gov.uk/government/history/past-prime-ministers/charles-watson-wentworth-2nd-marquess-of-rockingham}}</ref>
{{Main|Yorktown campaign}}
] fleet (left) engages the ] in the ] on September 5, 1781]]
] surrenders at ] in October 1781]]


Clinton spent most of 1781 based in New York City; he failed to construct a coherent operational strategy, partly due to his difficult relationship with Admiral ].<ref name="ap5wX">], p. 444</ref> In ], Cornwallis independently developed an aggressive plan for a campaign in Virginia, which he hoped would isolate Greene's army in the ] and cause the collapse of Patriot resistance in the ]. This strategy was approved by Lord Germain in London, but neither informed Clinton.<ref name="mnb58">], pp. 423, 520</ref>
Despite the defeats in America, the British still had 30,000 troops garrisoned there, occupying New York, Charleston and Savannah.<ref>Mackesy, p.&nbsp;435.</ref> Henry Clinton was recalled to London after the defeat at Yorktown, and departed America in March 1782.<ref>Hallahan, p. 245</ref> He was replaced by ], who was under orders to suspend offensive operations in America.<ref name="Greene, p. 325">Greene, p. 325</ref>


Washington and ] discussed their options: Washington wanted to attack the British in New York, and Rochambeau wanted to attack them in ], where Cornwallis's forces were less established.<ref name="xzQbp">], p. 139</ref> Washington eventually gave way, and Lafayette took a combined Franco-American force into Virginia.<ref name="bsnMy">], pp. 526–529</ref> Clinton misinterpreted his movements as preparations for an attack on New York and instructed Cornwallis to establish a fortified sea base, where the Royal Navy could evacuate British troops to help defend New York.<ref name="b3QwE">], pp. 43–44</ref>
=== Final years of the war (1781–1783) ===
{{Main|Anglo-French War (1778-1783)|Spain in the American Revolutionary War|Second Anglo-Mysore War|Fourth Anglo-Dutch War}}


When Lafayette entered Virginia, Cornwallis complied with Clinton's orders and withdrew to ], where he constructed strong defenses and awaited evacuation.<ref name="SkAo5">], pp. 293–295</ref> An agreement by the ] to defend the French West Indies allowed Admiral ] to relocate to the Atlantic seaboard, a move Arbuthnot did not anticipate.<ref name="ap5wX" /> This provided Lafayette naval support, while the failure of previous combined operations at ] and ] meant their coordination was planned more carefully.<ref name="6XKWu">]&nbsp;, pp. 247–248</ref> Despite repeated urging from his subordinates, Cornwallis made no attempt to engage Lafayette before he could establish siege lines.<ref name="jzAf8">], p. 205</ref> Expecting to be withdrawn within a few days, he also abandoned the outer defenses, which were promptly occupied by the besiegers and hastened British defeat.<ref name="4QJnx">], p. 337</ref>
==== Europe ====


On August 31, a Royal Navy fleet under ] left New York for Yorktown.<ref name="xdltf">], pp. 29–43</ref> After landing troops and munitions for the besiegers on August 30, de Grasse remained in Chesapeake Bay and intercepted him on September 5; although the ] was indecisive in terms of losses, Graves was forced to retreat, leaving Cornwallis isolated.<ref name="pTsmW">], p. 110</ref> An attempted breakout over ] at ] failed due to bad weather.<ref name="0d9W7">], pp. 36–37</ref> Under heavy bombardment with dwindling supplies, on October 16 Cornwallis sent emissaries to General Washington to negotiate surrender; after twelve hours of negotiations, the terms of surrender were finalized the following day.<ref name="g66wL">], pp. 534–535</ref> Responsibility for defeat was the subject of fierce public debate between Cornwallis, Clinton, and Germain. Clinton ultimately took most of the blame and spent the rest of his life in relative obscurity.<ref name="irWjD">], pp. 370–372</ref>
After hostilities with the Dutch began in late 1780, Britain had moved quickly, enforcing a blockade across the ]. Within weeks, the British had captured 200 Dutch merchantmen, and 300 more were holed up in foreign ports,<ref>{{citation |last=Dirks |first=J. J. B. |title=De Nederlandsche Zeemagt in Hare verschillende Tijdperken Geschetst. Deel 3 |year=1871 |publisher=H. Nijgh |location=Rotterdam |isbn= |language=Dutch }}, p. 291</ref> though political turmoil within the Republic<ref>Edler, pp. 169–176</ref> and peace negotiations by both sides helped keep conflict to a minimum.<ref>{{citation |last=Edler |first=F. |title=The Dutch Republic and The American Revolution |origyear=1911 |year=2001 |publisher=University Press of the Pacific |location=Honolulu, Hawaii |isbn=0-89875-269-8 }}, p.193-198</ref> The majority of the Dutch public favored a military alliance with France against Britain, however, the Dutch ] impeded these efforts, hoping to secure an early peace.<ref>Edler, p. 200-203</ref> To restore diminishing trade<ref>Davies, Charles Maurice. </ref> a Dutch squadron under ] escorted a fleet of some 70 merchantmen from the ]. Zoutman's ships were intercepted by ], who ] on 5 August 1781. Though the contest was tactically inconclusive, the Dutch fleet did not leave harbor again during the war, and their merchant fleet remained crippled.<ref>Syrett p. 131</ref>


Subsequent to Yorktown, American forces were assigned to supervise the armistice between Washington and Clinton made to facilitate British departure following the January 1782 law of Parliament forbidding any further British offensive action in North America. British-American negotiations in Paris led to signed preliminary agreements in November 1782, which acknowledged U.S. independence. The enacted ] war objective, a British withdrawal from North America and cession of these regions to the U.S., was completed in stages in East Coast cities.<ref name="OtLkf">], pp. 378–379</ref>
]'', September 13, 1782, by ]]]


In the U.S. South, Generals Greene and Wayne observed the British remove their troops from Charleston on December 14, 1782.<ref name="FF82B">], p. 516</ref> Loyalist provincial militias of whites and free blacks and Loyalists with slaves were transported to Nova Scotia and the British West Indies.{{efn|In Nova Scotia, a province that had been a Massachusetts county in the 1600s, British settlement of freed black Loyalists from the American Revolutionary War secured its Canadian claim there. Britain continued its last "Bourbon War" with the French and Spanish primarily amidst their mutually conflicting territorial claims adjacent the Caribbean Sea, including Jamaica, adjacent the Mediterranean Sea including ] and Isla Mallorca, and adjacent the Indian Ocean during the ].}} Native American allies of the British and some freed blacks were left to escape unaided through the American lines.
On 6 January 1781, a French ] to neutralize British privateering failed.<ref>Maj Gen Porter. History of the Corps of Royal Engineers. p. 208.</ref> Frustrated in their attempts to capture Gibraltar, a Franco-Spanish force of 14,000 men under the ] met with more success in August; ] on 19 August. After a long siege of ], the British garrison under ] surrendered on 5 February 1782,<ref>Chartrand, Rene. The French Army in the American War of Independence (1994), p. 54-56</ref> securing a primary war goal for the Spanish.<ref>Stockley, p. 19</ref> At Gibraltar, a ] on 13 September 1782 was repulsed with heavy casualties.<ref>{{Citation | language = Spanish| url = http://www.todoababor.es/datos_docum/bajas-flotantes.html | title = Bajas españolas de las baterías flotantes del ataque a Gibraltar el 13 de septiembre de 1782 |newspaper= Gaceta de Madrid |publisher=Todo a Babor |accessdate=11 March 2010}}.</ref> On 20 October 1782, following a successful resupply of Gibraltar, British ships under ] successfully ] to the Franco-Spanish fleet under Luis de Córdova, denying Córdova dominance at sea.<ref>Chartrand p.84</ref><ref>Fernández Duro, Cesáreo (1901). Armada Española desde la unión de los reinos de Castilla y Aragón. VII. Madrid, Spain: Sucesores de Rivadeneyra., p. 329</ref> On 7 February 1783, after 1,322{{refn|(3 years, 7 months and 2 weeks)}} days of siege, the Franco-Spanish army withdrew, decisively defeated.<ref>Syrett (2006), p. 105</ref><ref>{{Citation|last1=Chartrand |first1=René |first2=Patrice |last2=Courcelle |title=Gibraltar 1779–1783: The Great Siege |year=2006 |url=http://www.ospreypublishing.com/title_detail.php/title=S9770 |publisher=Osprey |location=Gibraltar |isbn=978-1-84176-977-6 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20070927003243/http://www.ospreypublishing.com/title_detail.php/title%3DS9770 |archivedate=September 27, 2007 }}, p. 86</ref>


On April 9, 1783, Washington issued orders that "all acts of hostility" were to cease immediately. That same day, by arrangement with Washington, Carleton issued a similar order to British troops.<ref name="zaInj">], p. 553</ref> As directed by a Congressional resolution of May 26, 1783, all non-commissioned officers and enlisted were furloughed "to their homes" until the "definitive treaty of peace", when they would be automatically discharged. The U.S. armies were directly disbanded in the field as of Washington's General Orders on June 2, 1783.<ref name="clMCt">], p. 350</ref> Once the Treaty of Paris was signed with Britain on September 3, 1783, Washington resigned as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army.<ref name="OtLkf" /> The last British occupation of New York City ended on November 25, 1783, with the departure of Clinton's replacement, General Sir ].<ref name="Xx5DW">], p. 312</ref>
==== Americas ====


==Strategy and commanders==
] in combat at ]. Oil on canvas, ], 2015.]]
]</ref> with British movements in red and American movements in blue; the timeline shows the British won most battles in the war's first half, but Americans won the most in the second.]]


To win their insurrection, Washington and the Continental Army needed to outlast the British will to fight. To restore ], the British had to defeat the Continental Army quickly and compel the Second Continental Congress to retract its claim to self-governance.<ref name="I7Xou">], pp. 1–2</ref> Historian Terry M. Mays of ] identifies three separate types of warfare during the Revolutionary War. The first was a colonial conflict in which objections to imperial trade regulation were as significant as taxation policy. The second was a civil war between American Patriots, American Loyalists, and those who preferred to remain neutral. Particularly in the south, many battles were fought between Patriots and Loyalists with no British involvement, leading to divisions that continued after independence was achieved.<ref name="StQAE">], pp. 2–3</ref>
In the West Indies, on 29–30 April 1781, a Royal Navy squadron under ] was ] by the French, led by the Comte de Grasse.<ref>Castex, Jean-Claude (2004). Dictionnaire des batailles navales franco-anglaises. Presses Université Laval. {{ISBN|978-2-7637-8061-0}}., p. 175-176</ref> de Grasse continued seizing British territories; ] fell on 2 June,<ref>De Grasse, François Joseph Paul. </ref> ] on 22 January 1782,<ref>Henry, Dalton G. (1855) The History of British Guiana: Comprising a General Description of the Colony: A narrative of some of the principal events from the earliest period of products and natural history., p.239</ref> ] on 12 February,<ref>David F. Marley. Wars of the Americas: A Chronology of Armed Conflict in the New World, 1492 to the Present ABC-CLIO (1998) {{ISBN|0-87436-837-5}}, p. 182</ref> despite a British ] on 25 January,<ref>Jaques, Hood arrived and repulsed de Grasse with victory at sea off Basseterre p. 881</ref> and ] on 22 February.<ref>Black p.59</ref> In 1782, the primary strategic goal of the French and Spanish was the capture of Jamaica,<ref>Dull, Jonathan. (1985) "A diplomatic history of the American Revolution", {{ISBN|978-0-3000-3886-6}}, p. 244</ref> whose sugar exports were more valuable to the British than the Thirteen Colonies combined.<ref name="O'Shaughnessy p. 208">O'Shaughnessy p. 208</ref><ref>Trew, Peter. (2005), "Rodney and the Breaking of the Line", Published by Leo Cooper Ltd. {{ISBN|978-1-8441-5143-1}}, p. 154-55</ref> On 7 April 1782, de Grasse departed ] to rendezvous with Franco-Spanish troops at ], and invade Jamaica from the north.<ref>Trew p. 157-62</ref> The British under Hood and ] pursued<ref>{{Cite book|last=Mahan|first=Alfred T.|year=1898|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hpI_AAAAYAAJ|title=Major Operations of the Royal Navy, 1762–1783: Being Chapter XXXI in The Royal Navy. A History|publisher=Little, Brown|location=Boston|oclc=46778589|ref=harv}}, p. 205-226</ref> and ]<ref>Black, Jeremy (1999). Warfare in the Eighteenth Century. London: Cassell. p. 141. {{ISBN|978-0-304-35245-6}}.</ref> the French off ] between 9–12 April. The Franco-Spanish plan to conquer Jamaica was in ruins,<ref>O'Shaughnessy p. 314</ref> and the balance of naval power in the Caribbean shifted to the Royal Navy.<ref>Mahan, p. 225-226</ref>


The third element was a global war between France, ], the ], and Britain, with America serving as one of several different war theaters.<ref name="StQAE" /> After entering the Revolutionary War in 1778, France provided the Americans money, weapons, soldiers, and naval assistance, while French troops fought under U.S. command in North America. While Spain did not formally join the war in America, they provided access to the Mississippi River and captured British possessions on the ] that denied bases to the Royal Navy, ] and ] in Europe.<ref name="ONzWM">], p. 168</ref> Although the Dutch Republic was no longer a major power prior to 1774, they still dominated the European carrying trade, and Dutch merchants made large profits by shipping French-supplied munitions to the Patriots. This ended when Britain declared war in December 1780, and the conflict proved disastrous to the Dutch economy.<ref name="72JXk">], pp. 572–573</ref>
After the ] to Spanish troops under Bernardo de Gálvez, an attempt to capture Pensacola was thwarted due to a hurricane. Emboldened by the disaster, ], British commander at Pensacola, decided to recapture Mobile.<ref>Nester, William R (2004). The frontier war for American independence. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole Books. {{ISBN|978-0-8117-0077-1}}, p. 291</ref> Campbell's expeditionary force of around 700 men was ] on 7 January 1781.<ref>Nester, p. 291</ref> After re-grouping at ], Gálvez set out for Pensacola on 13 February.<ref>Bense, Judith Ann (1999). Archaeology of colonial Pensacola. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida. {{ISBN|978-0-8130-1661-0}}, p. 36</ref> Arriving on 9 March, siege operations did not begin until 24 March, owing to difficulties in bringing the ships into the bay.<ref>Dupuy, R. Ernest; Hammerman, Gay; Hayes, Grace P (1977). The American Revolution: A Global War. New York: David McKay. {{ISBN|0-679-50648-9}}, p. 151</ref> After a 45-day siege, Gálvez ] the garrison, securing the conquest of West Florida.<ref>Caughey pp. 209–211</ref> In May, Spanish troops ],<ref>Chavez, Thomas E. Spain and the Independence of the United States: An Intrinsic Gift, University of New Mexico Press, 2003., p.208</ref> although the British bloodlessly ] the following year on 18 April.<ref>Marley, David. Wars of the Americas: A Chronology of Armed Conflict in the New World, 1492 to the Present, ABC-CLIO (1998). {{ISBN|0-87436-837-5}}, p. 346</ref>


===American strategy===
In Guatemala, ] led Spanish troops in an effort to dislocate British settlements along the ].<ref>Chávez, p. 151</ref> Gálvez ] on 16 March 1782, and then quickly took ].<ref>Chávez, p. 163</ref> Following the decisive naval victory at the ],<ref>Chávez, p. 165</ref> ], the Royal governor of Jamaica, authorized ] to re-take Black River,<ref>Jay, Mike, The Unfortunate Colonel Despard, Bantam Press, 2004 {{ISBN|0-593-05195-5}}, p. 93</ref> which ].<ref name="Chavez, p. 165">Chavez, p. 165</ref> However, with peace talks opening, and Franco-Spanish resources committed to the siege of Gibraltar, no further offensive operations took place.<ref name="Chavez, p. 165"/>
The Second Continental Congress stood to benefit if the Revolution evolved into a protracted war. Colonial state populations were largely prosperous and depended on local production for food and supplies rather than on imports from Britain. The thirteen colonies were spread across most of North American Atlantic seaboard, stretching 1,000 miles. Most colonial farms were remote from the seaports, and control of four or five major ports did not give Britain control over American inland areas. Each state had established internal distribution systems.<ref name="lNS5K">], pp. 36–39</ref> Motivation was also a major asset: each colonial capital had its ], and the Patriots enjoyed more popular support than the Loyalists. Britain hoped that the Loyalists would do much of the fighting, but found that the Loyalists did not engage as significantly as they had hoped.<ref name="6bqxv" />


====Continental Army====
Few operations were conducted against the Dutch, although several Dutch colonies ] by the British in 1781.<ref>Edler, F. (2001) . The Dutch Republic and The American Revolution. Honolulu, Hawaii: University Press of the Pacific. {{ISBN|0-89875-269-8}}.</ref> Sint Eustatius, a key supply port for the Patriots, was ] under George Rodney on 3 February 1782, plundering the island's wealth.<ref>Edler, p. 184</ref>
{{Main|Continental Army}}
{{See also|Militia (United States)#American Revolutionary War (1775-1783)|Minutemen}}
] by ], now housed in the ]|alt=Formal painting of General George Washington, standing in uniform, as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army]]


When the Revolutionary War began, the Second Continental Congress lacked a professional army or navy. However, each of the colonies had a long-established system of local militia, which were combat-tested in support of British regulars in the French and Indian War. The colonial state legislatures independently funded and controlled their local militias.<ref name="lNS5K"/>
==== India ====


Militiamen were lightly armed, had little training, and usually did not have uniforms. Their units served for only a few weeks or months at a time and lacked the training and discipline of more experienced soldiers. Local county militias were reluctant to travel far from home and were unavailable for extended operations.<ref name="JOPiQ">]&nbsp;, p. 59</ref> To compensate for this, the Continental Congress established a regular force known as the Continental Army on June 14, 1775, which proved to be the origin of the modern ], and appointed Washington as its commander-in-chief. However, it suffered significantly from the lack of an effective training program and from largely inexperienced officers.<ref name="4DbAi">], pp. 286–287</ref>
Following Dutch entry into the conflict, East India Company troops under ] captured the Dutch port of ] after a ] on 11 October 1781.<ref>Lohuizen, Jan (1961). The Dutch East India Company and Mysore, 1762–1790. 's-Gravenhage: M. Nijhoff, p. 117</ref> Soon after, British Admiral ] ] after a brief engagement on 11 January 1782.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=aBsEAAAAQAAJ&pg=PA119&dq=port+praya+suffren+1781&as_brr=3#PPA120,M1|title=Historical record of the Royal Marine Forces, Volume 2|first=Paul Harris|last=Nicolas|ref=Nicolas|year=1845|publisher=Thomas and William Boone|location=London}}, p. 124</ref>
Each state legislature appointed officers for both county and state militias and their regimental Continental line officers; although Washington was required to accept Congressional appointments, he was permitted to choose and command his own generals, such as Greene; his chief of artillery, Knox; and ], the chief of staff.<ref name="pSJBj">], Chap. 3</ref> One of Washington's most successful general officer recruits was Steuben, a veteran of the Prussian general staff who wrote the ].<ref name="4DbAi" /> The development of the Continental Army was always a work in progress and Washington used both his regulars and state militias throughout the war; when properly employed, the combination allowed them to overwhelm smaller British forces, as they did in battles at Concord, Boston, Bennington, and Saratoga. Both sides used partisan warfare, but the state militias effectively suppressed Loyalist activity when British regulars were not in the area.<ref name="JOPiQ" />{{Efn|Three branches of the United States Military trace their roots to the American Revolutionary War; the Army comes from the ]; the Navy comes from the ], appointing ] as the Navy's first commander.<ref name="63K4s">], pp. 11–12, 16</ref> The Marine Corps links to the ], created by Congress on November 10, 1775.<ref name="ztc3C">], pp. iv, 459</ref>}}


Washington designed the overall military strategy in cooperation with Congress, established the principle of civilian supremacy in military affairs, personally recruited his senior officer corps, and kept the states focused on a common goal.<ref name="l3gHY">], pp. 365–371</ref> Washington initially employed the inexperienced officers and untrained troops in ] rather than risk frontal assaults against Britain's professional forces.<ref name="UxzJ5">], pp. 92–109</ref> Over the course of the war, Washington lost more battles than he won, but he never surrendered his troops and maintained a fighting force in the face of British field armies.<ref name="oBjRC">]&nbsp;, pp. 258–261</ref>
] '']'' on the far left, exchange fire at ], by Auguste Jugelet, 1836. ]]


By prevailing European standards, the armies in America were relatively small, limited by lack of supplies and logistics. The British were constrained by the logistical difficulty of transporting troops across the Atlantic and their dependence on local supplies. Washington never directly commanded more than 17,000 men,<ref name="6Djag">], p. 264</ref> and the combined Franco-American army in the decisive American victory at ] was only about 19,000.<ref name="mtUen">]&nbsp;, p. 13</ref> At the beginning of 1776, Patriot forces consisted of 20,000 men, with two-thirds in the Continental Army and the other third in the state militias. About 250,000 American men served as regulars or as militia for the revolutionary cause during the war, but there were never more than 90,000 men under arms at any time.<ref name="0HyhO">], p. 51</ref>
In March 1781, French Admiral ] was dispatched to India to assist colonial efforts. Suffren arrived off the Indian coast in February 1782, where he ] a British fleet under Hughes, winning a narrow tactical victory.<ref>Castex (2004), p. 340-344</ref> After landing troops at ] to assist Mysore, Suffren's fleet clashed with Hughes again ] on 12 April. There was no clear victor, though Hughes' fleet came off worse,<ref>Castex (p. 315) calls this a French victory, on account of more severe damage to Hughes' fleet. Mahan (p. 566) does not explicitly designate a victor.</ref> and he withdrew to the British-held port of Trincomalee. Hyder Ali wished for the French to capture Negapatam to establish naval dominance over the British, and this task fell to Suffren. Suffren's fleet clashed with Hughes again ] on 6 July.<ref>Castex (2004), pp. 269–272</ref> Suffren withdrew to ], strategically defeated, and the British remained in control of Negapatam.<ref>Sweetman, Jack (1997). The Great Admirals: Command at Sea, 1587–1945. Naval Institute Press. {{ISBN|9780870212291}}., p. 176</ref><ref>Fredriksen, John C (2006). Revolutionary War Almanac Almanacs of American wars Facts on File library of American history. Infobase Publishing. {{ISBN|9780816074686}}., p. 229</ref> Intending to find a more suitable port than Cuddalore, Suffren captured Trincomalee on 1 September, and successfully ] two days later.<ref>{{cite book|title=Final French Struggles in India and on the Indian Seas|first=George Bruce|last=Malleson|publisher=W.H. Allen|year=1884|ref=Malleson|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=at5GAAAAIAAJ}}</ref>


On the whole, American officers never equaled their British opponents in tactics and maneuvers, and they lost most of the pitched battles. The great successes at Boston (1776), Saratoga (1777), and ] (1781) were won by trapping the British far from base with a greater number of troops.<ref name="pSJBj" /> After 1778, Washington's army was transformed into a more disciplined and effective force, mostly as a product of ]'s military training.<ref name="4DbAi" /> Immediately after the Continental Army emerged from Valley Forge in June 1778, it proved its ability to match the military capabilities of the British at the Battle of Monmouth, including a black ] regiment fending off a British bayonet attack and then counter charging the British for the first time as part of Washington's army.<ref name="kgNGc">], pp. 294–295</ref> After the Battle of Monmouth, Washington came to realize that saving entire towns was not necessary, but preserving his army and keeping the revolutionary spirit alive was more important. Washington informed ], then president of the Second Continental Congress,{{Efn|Laurens was president of the Second Continental Congress at this time.<ref name="6CNkb">Jillson and Wilson, 1994, p. 77</ref>}} "that the possession of our towns, while we have an army in the field, will avail them little."<ref name="76ZOZ">], p. 344</ref>
Meanwhile, Ali's troops ] as the East India Company regrouped.<ref>Vibart, H. M (1881). </ref> Company troops under ] led a counter-offensive, defeating Ali at ] on 1 July 1781,<ref>Naravane, M.S. (2014). Battles of the Honorourable East India Company. A.P.H. Publishing Corporation. p. 174. {{ISBN|9788131300343}}.</ref> ] on 27 August,<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://archive.org/download/in.ernet.dli.2015.180904/2015.180904.South-Of-India-History-Of-Mysoor--Vol-1.pdf|title=Historical Sketches of the South of India, in an Attempt to Trace the History of Mysoor|last=Wilks|first=Mark|date=|website=|archive-url=|archive-date=|dead-url=|access-date=4 June 2017}}</ref> and ] on 27 September, expelling the Mysorean troops from the Carnatic.<ref>Singh, Sarbans (1993). Battle Honours of the Indian Army 1757 – 1971. New Delhi: Vision Books. pp. 102–103. {{ISBN|8170941156}}.</ref><ref name='Vibart'>{{cite book |title=The Military History of the Madras Engineers and Pioneers, from 1743 up to the present time (Volume 1) |last=Vibart |first=H.M. |authorlink= |coauthors= |year=1881 |publisher=W.H. Allen & Co |location=London|pages=158–159 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QyxFAAAAYAAJ&dq=wandiwash%201781&pg=PA158#v=onepage&q=wandiwash%201781&f=false |accessdate=3 November 2013}}</ref> On 18 February 1782, Tipu Sultan defeated ] near ], taking his entire 1,800-strong force prisoner.<ref name="Naravane, M.S. 2014 pp. 173">Naravane, M.S. (2014). Battles of the Honorourable East India Company. A.P.H. Publishing Corporation. pp. 173–175. {{ISBN|9788131300343}}.</ref> The war had, by this point, reached an uneasy stalemate.<ref>Lohuizen, p. 115</ref> On 7 December 1782, Hyder Ali died,<ref>{{cite book |last=Hasan|first=Mohibbul|title=History of Tipu Sultan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hkbJ6xA1_jEC |accessdate=19 January 2013|year=2005|publisher=Aakar Books|isbn=8187879572 |page=21 }}</ref> and the rule of Mysore passed to his son, Tipu Sultan.<ref>{{cite book |last=Hasan|first=Mohibbul|title=History of Tipu Sultan|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hkbJ6xA1_jEC |accessdate=19 January 2013|year=2005|publisher=Aakar Books|isbn=8187879572 |page=24 }}</ref>


Although the Continental Congress was responsible for the war effort and provided supplies to the troops, Washington took it upon himself to pressure Congress and the state legislatures to provide the essentials of war; there was never nearly enough.<ref name="CX4G4">], p. 220</ref> Congress evolved in its committee oversight and established the Board of War, which included members of the military.<ref name="rBEkF">], p. 42</ref> Because the Board of War was also a committee ensnared with its own internal procedures, Congress also created the post of ], appointing Major General Benjamin Lincoln to the position in February 1781. Washington worked closely with Lincoln to coordinate civilian and military authorities and took charge of training and supplying the army.<ref name="t1m52">], pp. 3–4"</ref><ref name="4DbAi" />
Sultan advanced along the west coast, ] on 20 May 1783.<ref>{{cite book |last=Fortescue |first= John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1GlKAAAAYAAJ&dq=Bednore%201783&pg=PA489#v=onepage&q=Bednore%201783&f=false |title=A history of the British army |volume= Volume 3 |pages=483–489}}</ref> Meanwhile, on the east coast, an army under ] ] the French-held port of Cuddalore on 9 June 1783.<ref>{{Citation |last=Fortescue |first=Sir John William |year=1902 |title=A history of the British army |volume=3 |publisher=Macmillan |pages=481–485 |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofbritish03fortuoft}}</ref> On 20 June, key British naval support for the siege was neutralized when Suffren defeated Hughes' fleet ],<ref>Paine, Lincoln P. (2000). Warships of the world to 1900. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. {{ISBN|978-0-395-98414-7}}., p. 75</ref> and though narrow, the victory gave Suffren the opportunity to displace British holdings in India.<ref>Mahan, p. 416</ref> On 25 June, the Franco-Mysorean defenders made repeated sorties against British lines, though all assaults failed. On 30 June, news arrived of a ] between the belligerent powers, and the siege was effectively over when the French abandoned the siege.<ref>{{cite book|ref=harv|last=Hagan|first=Kenneth J.|title=Strategy in the American War of Independence: A Global Approach|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3k9_AgAAQBAJ|date=16 October 2009|publisher=Routledge|isbn=978-1-134-21039-8|chapter=The birth of American naval strategy|editor-last=Hagan|editor-first=Kenneth J.|editor2-last=McMaster|editor2-first=Michael T.|editor3-last=Stoker|editor3-first=Donald}}, p. 51</ref> Mangalore remained under siege, and capitulated to Sultan on 30 January 1784.<ref>Fortescue, p. 483-489</ref> Little fighting took place thereafter, and Mysore and Britain ] on 11 March.<ref name="Naravane, M.S. 2014 pp. 173"/>


====Continental Navy====
== Peace of Paris ==
{{Main|Continental Navy|Continental Marines}} {{see also|Privateer#American_Revolutionary_War|Whaleboat War}} {{Further|Naval battles of the American Revolutionary War}}
{{Main|Peace of Paris (1783)|Treaty of Paris (1783)}}
]'s famous painting of the American delegations at the Treaty of Paris. The British delegation refused to pose, and the painting was never completed.]]


] commanded by Captain ]]]
Following the surrender at Yorktown, the Whig party came to power in Britain and began opening negotiations for a cessation of hostilities. While peace negotiations were being undertaken, British troops in America were restricted from launching further offensives.<ref name="Greene, p. 325"/> Prime Minister the Earl of Shelburne was reluctant to accept American independence as a prerequisite for peace, as the British were aware that the French economy was nearly bankrupt, and reinforcements sent to the West Indies could potentially reverse the situation there. He preferred that the colonies accept Dominion status within the Empire,<ref name="www.number10.gov.uk" /> though a similar offer had been rejected by the Americans in 1778.<ref>{{cite book| url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ALDbuNPu_IQC&pg=PA121&lpg=PA121&dq=Carlisle+Commission&source=bl&ots=sSzqXOHwJC&sig=FXqEmNWTiCqLBcIb_QymwIstP3U&hl=en&ei=0_DrSYX2IdOrtgfkn5GRBg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=7#PPA121,M1| title=British friends of the American Revolution | author=Jerome R. Reich| page=121| publisher=M.E. Sharpe| year=1997| isbn=978-0-7656-0074-5 }}</ref> Negotiations soon began in Paris.


During the first summer of the war, Washington began outfitting schooners and other small seagoing vessels to prey on ships supplying the British in Boston.<ref name="N26y3">], p. 360</ref> The Second Continental Congress established the Continental Navy on October 13, 1775, and appointed ] as its first commander;<ref name="ofLtd">]&nbsp;, pp. 11–12, 16</ref> for most of the war, the Continental Navy included only a handful of small frigates and sloops, supported by privateers.<ref name="o5APS">]&nbsp;, pp. 331–346</ref> On November 10, 1775, Congress authorized the creation of the ], which ultimately evolved into the ].<ref name="ztc3C" />
The Americans initially demanded that Quebec be ceded to them as ],<ref>Rideau, Roger. A Brief History of Canada. Facts on File. p. 79.</ref> a proposal that was dropped when Shelburne accepted American demands for recognition of independence. On April 19, 1782, the Dutch formally recognized the United States as a sovereign power, enhancing American leverage at the negotiations.<ref name ="fiske">Fiske, John Boston, Houghton Mifflin (1896), via unimelb.edu.au— accessed 2008-01-11</ref> Spain initially impeded the negotiations, refusing to enter into peace talks until Gibraltar had been captured. The Comte de Vergennes proposed that American territory be confined to the east of the Appalachians; Britain would have sovereignty over the ], below which an ] would be established under Spanish control. The United States fiercely opposed the proposal.<ref>Dwight L. Smith, "A North American Neutral Indian Zone: Persistence of a British Idea." Northwest Ohio Quarterly 61#2–4 (1989): 46–63.</ref>


John Paul Jones became the first American naval hero when he captured ] on April 24, 1778, the first victory for any American military vessel in British waters.<ref name="L9ds0">]&nbsp;, pp. 331–346</ref> The last such victory was by the frigate ], commanded by Captain ]. On March 10, 1783, the ''Alliance'' outgunned HMS ''Sybil'' in a 45-minute duel while escorting Spanish gold from Havana to the Congress in Philadelphia.<ref name="unG7V">], "Last Naval Battle"</ref> After Yorktown, all US Navy ships were sold or given away; it was the first time in America's history that it had no fighting forces on the high seas.<ref name="jC7za">]&nbsp;, p. 240</ref>
].]]


Congress primarily commissioned privateers to reduce costs and to take advantage of the large proportion of colonial sailors found in the British Empire. In total, they included 1,700 ships that successfully captured 2,283 enemy ships to damage the British effort and to enrich themselves with the proceeds from the sale of cargo and the ship itself.<ref name="OVxVT">, "Privateers"</ref>{{Efn|In what was known as the ], American privateers mainly from ], ], and ] attacked and robbed British merchant ships and raided and robbed coastal communities of ] reputed to have Loyalist sympathies.<ref name="dqbl5">], p. 237</ref>}} About 55,000 sailors served aboard American privateers during the war.<ref name="usmm" />
The Americans skirted their allies, recognizing that more favorable terms would be found in London. They negotiated directly with Shelburne, who hoped to make Britain a valuable trading partner of America at the expense of France.<ref>Charles R. Ritcheson, "The Earl of Shelbourne and Peace with America, 1782–1783: Vision and Reality." International History Review 5#3 (1983): 322–345.</ref> To this end, Shelburne offered to cede all the land east of the ], north of Florida, and south of Quebec,<ref>William E. Lass (1980). Minnesota's Boundary with Canada: Its Evolution Since 1783. Minnesota Historical Society. pp. 63–70.</ref> while also allowing American fishermen access to the rich Newfoundland fishery.<ref>Jonathan R. Dull (1987). A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution. Yale UP. pp. 144–151.</ref> According to one historian, Shelburne was hoping to facilitate the growth of the American population, creating lucrative markets that Britain could exploit at no administrative cost to London.<ref>Charles R. Ritcheson, "The Earl of Shelbourne and Peace with America, 1782–1783: Vision and Reality." ''International History Review'' (1983) 5#3 pp: 322–345. </ref> As Vergennes commented, "the English buy peace rather than make it".<ref name="Thomas Paterson 2009 p 20">Quote from Thomas Paterson, J. Garry Clifford and Shane J. Maddock, American foreign relations: A history, to 1920 (2009) vol 1 p 20</ref>


===France===
Throughout the negotiations, Britain never consulted her American Indian allies, forcing them to reluctantly accept the treaty. However, the subsequent tension erupted into conflicts between the Indians and the young United States, the largest being the ].<ref>Benn (1993), p.&nbsp;17.</ref> Britain continued trying to create an Indian buffer state in the American Midwest as late as 1814 during the ].<ref>Dwight L. Smith, "A North American Neutral Indian Zone: Persistence of a British Idea" ''Northwest Ohio Quarterly'' 1989 61(2–4): 46–63.</ref><ref>{{cite book|last=Francis M. Carroll|title=A Good and Wise Measure: The Search for the Canadian-American Boundary, 1783–1842|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1AjlS20Q5J8C&pg=PA24|year=2001|publisher=U of Toronto Press|page=24}}</ref>
{{Main|France in the American Revolution}}
{{Further|History of the French Navy#Louis XVI|Military history of France#Ancien Régime}}


At the beginning of the war, the Americans had no major international allies, since most nation-states waited to see how the conflict unfolded. Over time, the Continental Army established its military credibility. Battles such as the Battle of Bennington, the Battles of Saratoga, and even defeats such as the Battle of Germantown, proved decisive in gaining the support of powerful European nations, including France, Spain, and the ]; the Dutch moved from covertly supplying the Americans with weapons and supplies to overtly supporting them.<ref name="zaqGl">], p. 249</ref>
Britain negotiated separate treaties with Spain, France, and the Dutch Republic.<ref>Frances G, Davenport and Charles O. Paullin, European Treaties Bearing on the History of the United States and Its Dependencies (1917) vol 1 p vii</ref> Gibraltar proved to be a stumbling block in the peace talks; Spain offered to relinquish their conquests in West Florida, Minorca, and the Bahamas<ref>Dull, p. 321</ref> in exchange for Gibraltar, terms which Shelburne steadfastly refused. Shelburne instead offered to cede ], West Florida, and Minorca if Spain would relinquish the claim on Gibraltar, terms which were reluctantly accepted.<ref>Dull, p. 327-331</ref> However, in the long-term, the new territorial gains were of little value to Spain.<ref name="historiographical431">Lawrence S. Kaplan, "The Treaty of Paris, 1783: A Historiographical Challenge", ''International History Review'', September 1983, Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp 431–42.</ref> France's only net gains were the island of ] in the Caribbean and ] in Africa, after agreeing to return all other colonial conquests to British sovereignty.<ref>Stone, Bailey. The Genesis of the French Revolution: A Global-historical Interpretation, UK, Cambridge University Press (1994).</ref> Britain returned Dutch Caribbean territories to Dutch sovereignty, in exchange for free trade rights in the ]<ref>Gerald Newman and Leslie Ellen Brown, Britain in the Hanoverian age, 1714–1837 (1997) p. 533</ref><ref>Edler 2001, 181–189</ref> and control of the Indian port of ].<ref>{{cite book|title=Gazetteer of South India, Volume 1|last=W.|first= Francis |url=https://books.google.com/?id=vERnljM1uiEC&pg=PA152&dq=negapatam#v=onepage&q=negapatam&f=false|publisher=Mittal Publications|year=2002|ref = harv|isbn=}}, p. 161</ref>


The decisive American victory at Saratoga convinced ], which was already a long-time rival of Britain, to offer the Americans the Treaty of Amity and Commerce. The two nations also agreed to a defensive Treaty of Alliance to protect their trade and also guaranteed American independence from Britain. To engage the United States as a French ally militarily, the treaty was conditioned on Britain initiating a war on France to stop it from trading with the U.S. Spain and the Dutch Republic were invited to join by both France and the United States in the treaty, but neither was responsive to the request.<ref name="yOYGS">]&nbsp;, pp. 82–83</ref>
Preliminary peace articles were signed in Paris on 30 November 1782, while preliminaries between Britain, Spain, France, and the Netherlands continued until September 1783. The United States ] ratified the ] on ]. Copies were sent back to Europe for ratification by the other parties involved, the first reaching France in March 1784. British ratification occurred on April 9, 1784, and the ratified versions were exchanged in Paris on May 12, 1784.<ref>Dwight L. Smith, "Josiah Harmar, Diplomatic Courier." ''Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography'' 87.4 (1963): 420–430.</ref> The war formally concluded on September 3, 1783.<ref name="was proclaimed by Congress">A ceasefire in America on April 11, 1783 in response to a ceasefire agreement between Great Britain and France on January 20, 1783. The final peace treaty was signed on September 3, 1783 and ratified in the U.S. on January 14, 1784, with final ratification exchanged in Europe on May 12, 1784. Hostilities in India continued until July 1783.</ref>


On June 13, 1778, France declared war on Great Britain, and it invoked the French military alliance with the U.S., which ensured additional U.S. private support for French possessions in the ].{{Efn|King George III feared that the war's prospects would make it unlikely he could reclaim the North American colonies.<ref name="JuC0w">], p. 447</ref> During the later years of the Revolution, the British were drawn into numerous other conflicts about the globe.<ref name="OqppY">], pp. 405–448</ref>}} Washington worked closely with the soldiers and navy that France would send to America, primarily through Lafayette on his staff. French assistance made critical contributions required to defeat Cornwallis at Yorktown in 1781.<ref name="fNRxX">], pp. 203, 303, 391</ref>{{Efn|The final elements for US victory over Britain and US independence was assured by direct military intervention from France, as well as ongoing French supply and commercial trade over the final three years of the war.<ref name="jPPnA">]&nbsp;, pp. 188–198</ref>}}
The last British troops ] on November 25, 1783, marking the end of British rule in the new United States.<ref>Richard Morris, ''The Peacemakers: The Great Powers and American Independence'' (1983).</ref>


== Aftermath == ===British strategy===
{{Further|Seven Years' War}}


The British military had considerable experience fighting in North America.<ref name="cdOwo">], pp. 21–22</ref> However, in previous conflicts they benefited from local logistics and support from the colonial militia. In the American Revolutionary War, reinforcements had to come from Europe, and maintaining large armies over such distances was extremely complex; ships could take three months to cross the Atlantic, and orders from London were often outdated by the time they arrived.<ref name="HZaQ9">], pp. 298, 306</ref>
=== Casualties and losses ===


Prior to the conflict, the colonies were largely autonomous economic and political entities, with no centralized area of ultimate strategic importance.<ref name="Jvdgy">], p. 2</ref> This meant that, unlike Europe where the fall of a capital city often ended wars, that in America continued even after the loss of major settlements such as Philadelphia, the seat of Congress, New York, and Charleston.<ref name="WTNUb">], pp. 148–149</ref> British power was reliant on the Royal Navy, whose dominance allowed them to resupply their own expeditionary forces while preventing access to enemy ports. However, the majority of the American population was agrarian, rather than urban; supported by the French navy and blockade runners based in the ], their economy was able to survive.<ref name="Pole 2004">], pp. 42, 48</ref>
==== Americans and allies ====
], Prime Minister since 1770, delegated control of the war in North America to ] and the ], who was ] from 1771 to 1782. Defeat at Saratoga in 1777 made it clear the revolt would not be easily suppressed, especially after the Franco-American alliance of February 1778. With Spain also expected to join the conflict, the Royal Navy needed to prioritize either the war in America or in Europe; Germain advocated the former, Sandwich the latter.<ref name="Zfq4g">], pp. 18–22</ref>
The total loss of life throughout the conflict is largely unknown. As was typical in wars of the era, diseases such as ] claimed more lives than battle. Between 1775 and 1782, a ] broke out throughout North America, killing 40 people in Boston alone. Historian ] suggests that Washington's decision to have his troops ] against the disease was one of his most important decisions.<ref>Ellis (2004), p.&nbsp;87.</ref>


North initially backed the Southern strategy attempting to exploit divisions between the mercantile north and slave-owning south, but after the defeat of Yorktown, he was forced to accept that this policy had failed.<ref name="6mBg1">], p. 333</ref> It was clear the war was lost, although the Royal Navy forced the French to relocate their fleet to the Caribbean in November 1781 and resumed a close blockade of American trade.<ref name="EiC1K">], p. 64</ref> The resulting economic damage and rising inflation meant the US was now eager to end the war, while France was unable to provide further loans; Congress could no longer pay its soldiers.<ref name="q5EIL">], pp. 300–313</ref>
Between 25,000 and 70,000 American Patriots died during active military service.<ref name="Howard H. Peckham 1974"/> Of these, approximately 6,800 were killed in battle, while at least 17,000 died from disease. The majority of the latter died while ] of the British, mostly in the ] in New York Harbor.<ref name="Burrows" /> If the upper limit of 70,000 is accepted as the total net loss for the Patriots, it would make the conflict proportionally deadlier than the ].<ref name=medical /> Uncertainty arises due to the difficulties in accurately calculating the number of those who succumbed to disease, as it is estimated at least 10,000 died in 1776 alone.<ref name=medical /> The number of Patriots seriously wounded or disabled by the war has been estimated from 8,500 to 25,000.<ref>American dead and wounded: Shy, pp.&nbsp;249–50. The lower figure for number of wounded comes from Chambers, p.&nbsp;849.</ref>
The geographical size of the colonies and limited manpower meant the British could not simultaneously conduct military operations and occupy territory without local support. Debate persists over whether their defeat was inevitable; one British statesman described it as "like trying to conquer a map".<ref name="arzue">], p. 148</ref> While ] argues Patriot victory was nothing short of a miracle,<ref name="holEy">], pp. 562–577</ref> ] suggests the odds always favored the Americans, especially after Howe squandered the chance of a decisive British success in 1776, an "opportunity that would never come again".<ref name="MqYnj">], p. xi</ref> The US military history speculates the additional commitment of 10,000 fresh troops in 1780 would have placed British victory "within the realm of possibility".<ref name="Ma3JT">], vol. 4, p. 103</ref>
====British Army====
{{Main|British Army during the American Revolutionary War}}
{{See also|Loyalist (American Revolution)#Military service}}
], ] Commander from 1763 to 1775]]


The expulsion of France from North America in 1763 led to a drastic reduction in British troop levels in the colonies; in 1775, there were only 8,500 regular soldiers among a civilian population of 2.8&nbsp;million.<ref name="0qbek">], Vol. 1, p. 268</ref> The bulk of military resources in the Americas were focused on defending sugar islands in the Caribbean; ] alone generated more revenue than all thirteen American colonies combined.<ref name="FJWrp">], p. 83</ref> With the end of the Seven Years' War, the permanent army in Britain was also cut back, which resulted in administrative difficulties when the war began a decade later.<ref name="Y118y">], p. 65</ref>
The French suffered approximately 7,000 total dead throughout the conflict; of those, 2,112 were killed in combat in the American theaters of war.<ref name="frenchcasualtiesrevolution" />


Over the course of the war, there were four separate British commanders-in-chief. The first was Thomas Gage, appointed in 1763, whose initial focus was establishing British rule in former French areas of Canada. Many in London blamed the revolt on his failure to take firm action earlier, and he was relieved after the heavy losses incurred at the Battle of Bunker Hill.<ref name="cosou">], p. 86</ref> His replacement was Sir William Howe, a member of the Whig faction in Parliament who opposed the policy of coercion advocated by Lord North; Cornwallis, who later surrendered at Yorktown, was one of many senior officers who initially refused to serve in North America.<ref name="CZWL2">], p. 76</ref>
The Dutch suffered around 500 total killed, owing to the minor scale of their conflict with Britain.<ref name="Necrometrics">{{cite web|url= http://necrometrics.com/wars18c.htm#AmRev |title= Spanish casualties in The American Revolutionary war. |publisher= Necrometrics}}</ref>


The 1775 campaign showed the British overestimated the capabilities of their own troops and underestimated the colonial militia, requiring a reassessment of tactics and strategy,<ref name="pWpln">], p. 208</ref> and allowing the Patriots to take the initiative.<ref name="57mVs">], pp. 410–412</ref> Howe's responsibility is still debated; despite receiving large numbers of reinforcements, Bunker Hill seems to have permanently affected his self-confidence and lack of tactical flexibility meant he often failed to follow up opportunities.<ref name="r4hyC">], p. 44</ref> Many of his decisions were attributed to supply problems, such as his failure to pursue Washington's beaten army.<ref name="MlUcq">], vol. 12 – 1776, 5:93, Howe to Germain, June 7 and July 7, 1776</ref> Having lost the confidence of his subordinates, he was recalled after Burgoyne surrendered at Saratoga.<ref name="UkMe5">], p. 216</ref>
==== British and allies ====
British returns in 1783 listed 43,633 rank and file deaths across the ].<ref name="Annual Register, 1783"> (1785), pp. 199–200.</ref> A table from 1781 puts total British Army deaths at 9,372 soldiers killed in battle across the Americas; 6,046 in North America (1775–1779), and 3,326 in the West Indies (1778–1780).<ref name="books.google.com"> (1781), pp. 263–65.</ref> In 1784, a British lieutenant compiled a detailed list of 205 British officers killed in action during the war, encompassing Europe, the Caribbean and the East Indies.<ref>, Volume 27 (1903), p. 176.</ref> Extrapolations based upon this list puts British Army losses in the area of at least 4,000 killed or died of wounds.<ref name=medical /> Approximately 7,774 ] died in British service in addition to 4,888 deserters; of the former, it is estimated 1,800 were killed in combat.<ref name=medical />


Following the failure of the Carlisle Commission, British policy changed from treating the Patriots as subjects who needed to be reconciled to enemies who had to be defeated.<ref name="o6DjZ">], pp. 160–161</ref> In 1778, Howe was replaced by Sir Henry Clinton.<ref name="eA9wm">], p.</ref> Regarded as an expert on tactics and strategy,<ref name="UkMe5" /> like his predecessors Clinton was handicapped by chronic supply issues.<ref name="BZg2c">], vol. 15 – 1778, 5:96, Clinton to Germain, September 15, 1778</ref> In addition, Clinton's strategy was compromised by conflict with political superiors in London and his colleagues in North America, especially Admiral ], replaced in early 1781 by Rodney.<ref name="ap5wX" /> He was neither notified nor consulted when Germain approved Cornwallis's invasion of the south in 1781 and delayed sending him reinforcements believing the bulk of Washington's army was still outside New York City.<ref name="mWJRm">], pp. 208–210</ref> After the surrender at Yorktown, Clinton was relieved by Carleton, whose major task was to oversee the evacuation of Loyalists and British troops from Savannah, Charleston, and New York City.<ref name="YZsHH">], "Revolutionary War in Georgia"</ref>
Around 171,000 ] served in the ] during the war; approximately a quarter of whom had been ] into service. Around 1,240 were killed in battle, while an estimated 18,500 died from disease (1776–1780).<ref name="Parliamentary Register" /> The greatest killer at sea was ], a disease caused by ] deficiency.<ref name=GARD2016>{{cite web|title=Scurvy|url=https://rarediseases.info.nih.gov/diseases/10406/scurvy|website=GARD|accessdate=26 September 2016|date=5 June 2017}}</ref> It was not until 1795 that scurvy was eradicated from the Royal Navy after the Admiralty declared ] and ] were to be issued among the standard daily rations of sailors.<ref name="Vale, Brian 2008">Vale, Brian (2008). "The Conquest of Scurvy in the Royal Navy 1793–1800: a Challenge to Current Orthodoxy". The Mariner's Mirror. 94: 160–175.</ref> Around 42,000 sailors ] during the war.<ref>Mackesy (1964), pp.&nbsp;6, 176 (British seamen).</ref> The impact on merchant shipping was substantial; an estimated 3,386 ] were seized by enemy forces during the war;<ref>Conway (1995) p. 191</ref> of those, 2,283 were taken by American privateers alone.<ref name="John Pike">{{cite web|author=John Pike |url=http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/navy/privateer.htm |title=Privateers |publisher=Globalsecurity.org |date=October 18, 1907 |accessdate=May 8, 2013}}</ref>


=== Financial debts === ====German troops====
{{Main|Hessian (soldier)}}
{{Main|Financial costs of the American Revolutionary War}}
At the start of the war, the economy of the colonies was flourishing,<ref>Marston, Daniel. The American Revolution 1774–1783. Osprey Publishing (2002) {{ISBN|978-1-84176-343-9}}. p. 82</ref> and the free white population enjoyed the highest standard of living in the world.<ref>{{Cite journal|last=Whaples|first=Robert|author-link=Robert Whaples|journal=]|publisher=]|volume=55|issue=1|pages=144|jstor=2123771|title=Where Is There Consensus Among American Economic Historians? The Results of a Survey on Forty Propositions|year=March 1995|via=]|registration=y|doi=10.1017/S0022050700040602|quote=There is an overwhelming consensus that Americans' economic standard of living on the eve of the Revolution was among the highest in the world.}}</ref> The Royal Navy enforced a naval blockade during the war to financially cripple the colonies, however, this proved unsuccessful; 90% of the population worked in farming, not in coastal trade, and, as such, the American economy proved resilient enough to withstand the blockade.<ref name="Pole 2004">Greene and Pole, eds., A Companion to the American Revolution (2004) chapters 42, 48</ref>


] troops surrender after ]'s victory at the ] in December 1776]]
Congress had immense difficulties throughout the conflict to efficiently finance the war effort.<ref>Curtis P. Nettels, The Emergence of a National Economy, 1775–1815 (1962) pp 23–44</ref> As the circulation of hard currency declined, the Americans had to rely on loans from American merchants and bankers, France, Spain and the Netherlands, saddling the young nation with crippling debts. Congress attempted to remedy this by printing vast amounts of paper money and bills of credit to raise revenue. The effect was disastrous; inflation skyrocketed, and the paper money became virtually worthless. The inflation spawned a popular phrase that anything of little value was "not worth a ]".<ref>"", "Creating the United States", Library of Congress. Retrieved 14 January 2012.</ref>


During the 18th century, states commonly ], including Britain.<ref name="jSAGZ">], p. 115</ref> When it became clear additional troops were needed to suppress the revolt in America, it was decided to employ ]. There were several reasons for this, including public sympathy for the Patriot cause, a historical reluctance to expand the British army and the time needed to recruit and train new regiments.<ref name="cCTlC">], p. 117</ref> Many smaller states in the ] had a long tradition of renting their armies to the highest bidder. The most important was ], known as "the Mercenary State".<ref name="NNZE8">], "Best armies money could buy"</ref>
By 1791, the United States had accumulated a national debt of approximately $75.5 million.<ref>Trescott, Paul. "Federal-State Financial Relations, 1790–1860". 15: 227–45.</ref> The United States finally solved its debt and currency problems in the 1790s, when ] ] secured legislation by which the national government assumed all of the state debts, and, in addition, created a ] and a funding system based on tariffs and bond issues that paid off the foreign debts.<ref>{{cite book|author=David Kennedy|title=The Brief American Pageant: A History of the Republic, Volume I: To 1877|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=dfWPpr84E7QC&pg=PA136|year=2011|publisher=Cengage Learning|page=136|display-authors=etal}}</ref>


The first supply agreements were signed by the North administration in late 1775; 30,000 Germans served in the American War.<ref name="btSGH">], pp. 111–112</ref> Often generically referred to as "Hessians", they included men from many other states, including ] and Brunswick.<ref name="srbv4">], p. 508</ref> Sir Henry Clinton recommended recruiting Russian troops whom he rated very highly, having seen them in action against the ]; however, negotiations with ] made little progress.<ref name="IqLsU">], pp. 118–119</ref>
Britain spent around ]80 million and ended with a ] of £250 million, (£{{Formatprice|{{inflation|UK|250000000|1783}}}} in today's money), generating a yearly interest of £9.5 million annually. The debts piled upon that which it had already accumulated from the ].<ref>{{cite book|author=Robert Tombs and Isabelle Tombs|title=That Sweet Enemy: The French and the British from the Sun King to the Present|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TxUqAAAAYAAJ&q=american+revolution+British+%C2%A380+million++of+%C2%A3250+million,++%C2%A39.5+interest+inauthor:Tombs&dq=american+revolution+British+%C2%A380+million++of+%C2%A3250+million,++%C2%A39.5+interest+inauthor:Tombs&hl=en&sa=X&ei=d6KXVaThE8zeUaTMg7gN&redir_esc=y |year=2006|page=179|publisher=Knopf Doubleday }}</ref> Due to wartime taxation upon the British populace, the tax for the average Briton amounted to approximately four ] in every ].<ref>Conway, Stephen. The War of American Independence 1775–1783. Publisher: E. Arnold (1995) {{ISBN|0-340-62520-1}}. 280 pages.</ref>


Unlike previous wars their use led to intense political debate in Britain, France, and even Germany, where ] refused to provide passage through his territories for troops hired for the American war.<ref name="schmidt208-209">], pp. 208–209</ref> In March 1776, the agreements were challenged in Parliament by Whigs who objected to "coercion" in general, and the use of foreign soldiers to subdue "British subjects".<ref name="vyLv6">], pp. 121, 141–142</ref> The debates were covered in detail by American newspapers; in May 1776 they received copies of the treaties themselves, provided by British sympathizers and smuggled into North America from London.<ref name="tIwST">], pp. 143–144</ref>
The French spent approximately 1.3 billion ] on aiding the Americans,<ref>{{cite book |first=Stacy |last=Schiff |title=A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1vhpYe99Tn4C&pg=PT18 |year=2006 |publisher=Macmillan |page=5}}</ref> accumulating a national debt of 3.315.1 billion livres by 1783 on war costs.<ref>Conway (1995) p. 242</ref> Unlike Britain, which had a very efficient taxation system,<ref>Paul Kennedy, The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers (1987) p. 81, 119</ref> the French tax system was highly unstable, eventually leading to a financial crisis in 1786.<ref>Marston (2002) p. 82</ref> The debts contributed to a worsening fiscal crisis that ultimately begat the ] at the end of the century.<ref>Tombs (2007) p. 179</ref> The debt continued to spiral; on the eve of the French Revolution, the national debt had skyrocketed to 12 billion livres.<ref>{{cite book|author=Stacy Schiff|authorlink=Stacy Schiff|title=A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1vhpYe99Tn4C&pg=PT18|year=2006|publisher=Macmillan|page=5}}</ref>


The prospect of foreign German soldiers being used in the colonies bolstered support for independence, more so than taxation and other acts combined; the King was accused of declaring war on his own subjects, leading to the idea there were now two separate governments.<ref name="ImWYT">], pp. 136–143</ref><ref name="juHEN">], p. 20</ref> By apparently showing Britain was determined to go to war, it made hopes of reconciliation seem naive and hopeless, while the employment of what was regarded as "foreign mercenaries" became one of the charges levelled against George III in the Declaration of Independence.<ref name="schmidt208-209" /> The Hessian reputation within Germany for brutality also increased support for the Patriot cause among German American immigrants.<ref name="taPBr">], p. 142</ref>
Spain had nearly doubled her military spending during the war, from 454 million ] in 1778 to over 700 million in 1779.<ref>Lynch, John. Bourbon Spain 1700–1808. Publisher: Oxford (1989) {{ISBN|978-0-631-19245-9}}. p. 326</ref> Spain more easily disposed of her debts unlike her French ally, partially due to the massive increase in ] in her American colonies; production increased approximately 600% in Mexico, and by 250% in Peru and Bolivia.<ref>Castillero Calvo, Alfredo (2004). Las Rutas de la Plata: La Primera Globalización. Madrid: Ediciones San Marcos. {{ISBN|84-89127-47-6}}., p. 193</ref>


The presence of over 150,000 ] meant both sides felt the German soldiers might be persuaded to desert; one reason Clinton suggested employing Russians was that he felt they were less likely to defect. When the first German troops arrived on Staten Island in August 1776, Congress approved the printing of handbills, promising land and citizenship to any willing to join the Patriot cause. The British launched a counter-campaign claiming deserters could be executed.<ref name="mauch415">], p. 415</ref> Desertion among the Germans occurred throughout the war, with the highest rate of desertion occurring between the surrender at Yorktown and the Treaty of Paris.<ref name="Nf6u9">], p. 194</ref> German regiments were central to the British war effort; of the estimated 30,000 sent to America, some 13,000 became casualties.<ref name="bnmql">], pp. 20–21, 282–283</ref>
== Analysis of combatants ==


=== Great Britain === ==Revolution as civil war==
{{See also|British Army during the American Revolutionary War|Royal Navy|Hessian (soldier)|Loyalist (American Revolution)}}


===Loyalists===
] at the ] in 1775.]]
{{Main|Loyalist (American Revolution)}}
{{See also|American Legion (Great Britain)|Prince of Wales' American Regiment}}
] routed ] at the ] in 1780, raising Patriot morale.]]


Wealthy Loyalists convinced the British government that most of the colonists were sympathetic toward the Crown;<ref name="6cWCe">], p. 6</ref> consequently, British military planners relied on recruiting Loyalists, but had trouble recruiting sufficient numbers as the Patriots had widespread support.<ref name="JOPiQ" />{{Efn|On militia see Boatner 1974, p.&nbsp;707;<br />Weigley 1973, ch.&nbsp;2}} Approximately 25,000 Loyalists fought for the British throughout the war.<ref name="savas41" /> Although Loyalists constituted about twenty percent of the colonial population,<ref name="Greene p. 235" /> they were concentrated in distinct communities. Many of them lived among large plantation owners in the ] and ].<ref name="Greene p. 235" />
The population of ] and ] in 1780 was approximately 12.6 million,<ref>Mulhall, Michael G., (1884), p. 357.</ref> while the ] held a population of some 2.8 million, including some 500,000 slaves.<ref> U.S. Census Bureau.</ref> Theoretically, Britain had the advantage, however, many factors inhibited the procurement of a large army.


When the British began probing the backcountry in 1777–1778, they were faced with a major problem: any significant level of organized Loyalist activity required a continued presence of British regulars.<ref name="Gu69t">]&nbsp;, p. 12</ref> The available manpower that the British had in America was insufficient to protect Loyalist territory and counter American offensives.<ref name="xeYC7">]&nbsp;, pp. 13–14</ref> The Loyalist militias in the South were constantly defeated by neighboring Patriot militia. The Patriot victory at the Battle of Kings Mountain irreversibly impaired Loyalist militia capability in the South.<ref name="NcMDc" />
==== Armed Forces ====


When the early war policy was administered by Howe, the Crown's need to maintain Loyalist support prevented it from using the traditional revolt suppression methods.<ref name="m4e3v">]&nbsp;, p. 14</ref> The British cause suffered when their troops ransacked local homes during an aborted attack on Charleston in 1779 that enraged both Patriots and Loyalists.<ref name="yBaSD" /> After Congress rejected the ] in 1778 and Westminster turned to "hard war" during Clinton's command, neutral colonists in the Carolinas often allied with the Patriots.<ref name="dh9oI">]&nbsp;, pp. 14–16 , 35, 38</ref> Conversely, Loyalists gained support when Patriots intimidated suspected Tories by destroying property or ].<ref name="4VC7B">], p. {{Page needed|date=June 2023}}</ref>
===== Recruitment =====


A Loyalist militia unit—the ]—provided some of the best troops in British service.<!-- Add citation for Babits 1998? --><ref name="b5poP">], p. 327</ref> It was commanded by Tarleton and gained a fearsome reputation in the colonies for "brutality and needless slaughter".<ref name="rankin">], pp. 548–550</ref>{{better source needed|reason=see talk The Green Dragoon|date=May 2023}}
]
{{Clear}}


===Women===
In 1775, the standing ], exclusive of militia, comprised 45,123 men worldwide, made up of 38,254 infantry and 6,869 cavalry. The Army had approximately eighteen regiments of foot, some 8,500 men, stationed in North America.<ref>Clode, Charles Matthew (1869), "The Military Forces of the Crown: Their Administration and Government", London, J Murray, p. 268. '''Note:''' Figures include the 41st regiment of invalids, but not the 20 independent companies on garrison duty. Troops in India were under the control of the ], and did not become part of the British Army until 1858.</ref> Standing armies had played a key role in the purge of the ] in 1648,<ref>{{cite book|title=The Oxford Companion to British History.|edition=2|authorlink=Pride's Purge}}</ref> the maintenance of a ] under ],<ref>{{Citation|last=Plant |first=David |url=http://www.british-civil-wars.co.uk/glossary/rule-major-generals.htm |title=Rule of the Major-Generals |publisher=British Civil Wars and Commonwealth website|accessdate= June 9, 2017}}</ref> and the ],<ref>Rodger, N.A.M (2004). The Command of the Ocean: A Naval History of Britain 1649–1815. Penguin Group. {{ISBN|978-0-393-06050-8}}, p. 137</ref> and, as such, the Army had been deliberately kept small in peacetime to prevent abuses of power by the King.<ref name="Scheer64" /><ref name=Finchley>{{cite news|url= http://www.umich.edu/~ece/student_projects/soldier|title=The March of the Guards to Finchley; 18th Century Recruitment|publisher=Umich education|accessdate=|date=}}</ref> Despite this, eighteenth century armies were not easy guests, and were regarded with scorn and contempt by the ] and public of the ] and ] alike, derided as enemies of liberty. An expression ran in the ]; "A messmate before a shipmate, a shipmate before a stranger, a stranger before a dog, a dog before a soldier".<ref>Belcher, Henry (1911), "The First American Civil War; First Period, 1775–1778, with chapters on the Continental or Revolutionary army and on the forces of the Crown", Volume 1, London Macmillan, p. 250, 258</ref>
{{Main|Women in the American Revolution}}
] single-handedly captured six ] soldiers who barged into her home intending to ransack it.]]


Women played various roles during the Revolutionary War; they often accompanied their husbands when permitted. For example, throughout the war ] was known to visit and provide aid to her husband George at various American camps.<ref name="NsXgO">], p. 215</ref> Women often accompanied armies as ]s to sell goods and perform necessary tasks in hospitals and camps, and numbered in the thousands during the war.<ref name="s5toN">], "Camp Followers"</ref>
Parliament suffered chronic difficulties in obtaining sufficient manpower,<ref>War Office Papers, Manuscripts in the Public Record Office, 1:992–1008, passim</ref> and found it impossible to fill the quotas they had set.<ref>War Officer Papers, 4:275, Jenkinson to Clinton, 5 Dec. 1780</ref> The Army was a deeply unpopular profession, one contentious issue being pay. A ] infantryman was paid a wage of just 8] per day,<ref>9th Report on Public Accounts (1783) in 39 House of Commons Journal, H.M. Stationery Office, 1803, pp. 325–344</ref> the same pay as for a ] infantryman, 130 years earlier.<ref>Plant, David, "The New Model Army", BCW Project, http://bcw-project.org/military/new-model-army, Retrieved 9 June 2017</ref> The rate of pay in the army was insufficient to meet the rising costs of living, turning off potential recruits,<ref>Fortescue, Volume III, p. 41</ref> as service was nominally for life.<ref>Owen, Captain Wheeler (1914), "The War Office Past and Present", Methuen & Co. London, p. 90</ref>


Women also assumed military roles: some dressed as men to directly support combat, fight, or act as spies on both sides.<ref name="HUZJR">], "Women Spies"</ref> Anna Maria Lane joined her husband in the Army. The Virginia General Assembly later cited her bravery: she fought while dressed as a man and "performed extraordinary military services, and received a severe wound at the battle of Germantown ... with the courage of a soldier".<ref name="F5oSv">]</ref> On April 26, 1777, ] is said to have ridden to alert militia forces to the British's approach; she has been called the "female Paul Revere".<ref name="om7F0">], pp. 188–222</ref> Whether the ride occurred is questioned.<ref name=Hunt>{{Cite journal|last=Hunt|first=Paula D.|date=June 2015|title=Sybil Ludington, the Female Paul Revere: The Making of a Revolutionary War Heroine |journal=]|volume=88|issue=2|pages=187–222|doi=10.1162/TNEQ_a_00452|s2cid=57569643|issn=0028-4866|doi-access=free}}</ref><ref name=Tucker>{{cite news |title= Did the Midnight Ride of Sibyl Ludington Ever Happen? |last= Tucker |first= Abigail |date= March 2022 |access-date= July 6, 2022 |url= https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/did-midnight-ride-sibyl-ludington-ever-happen-180979557/ |work= ]}}</ref><ref name= Lewis>{{cite web |url= https://www.thoughtco.com/sybil-ludington-biography-3530671 |title= Sybil Ludington, Possible Female Paul Revere |publisher= ] |date= August 15, 2019 |access-date= July 6, 2022 |last= Lewis |first= Jone Johnson}}</ref><ref name=Eschner>{{cite news |url= https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smithsonianmag/was-there-really-teenage-female-paul-revere-180962993/ |work= ] |title= Was There Really a Teenage, Female Paul Revere? |last= Eschner |first= Kat |date= April 26, 2017 |access-date= July 6, 2022}}</ref> A few others ]. ] fought until her gender was discovered and she was discharged as a result; ] was killed in action.<ref name="F5oSv" />
To entice people to enrol, Parliament offered a ] of ]1.10] for every recruit.<ref>War Office Papers, 3:5, Harvey to Elliot, 10 March 1775</ref> As the war dragged on, Parliament became desperate for manpower; criminals were offered military service to escape legal penalties, and deserters were pardoned if they re-joined their units.<ref>Clode, Volume II, p.13-14</ref> After the defeat at Saratoga, Parliament doubled the bounty to £3,<ref>Statutes at Large, Ruffhead's Edition (London, 1763–1800), Volume XIII, p. 273-280</ref> and increased it again the following year, to £3.3s, as well as expanding the age limit from 17–45 to 16–50 years of age.<ref>Statutes at Large, Ruffhead's Edition, Volume XIII, p. 316-317</ref>


===African Americans===
], essentially conscription by the "press gang", was a favored recruiting method, though it was unpopular with the public, leading many to enlist in local militias to avoid regular service.<ref>War Office Papers, 4:966, Jenkinson to John Livesey and E. Brewer, 13 Apr. 1779</ref> Attempts were made to draft such levies, much to the chagrin of the militia commanders.<ref>War Office Papers, 1:996, Sir William Codrington to Barrington, December 1778</ref> Competition between naval and army press gangs, and even between rival ships or regiments, frequently resulted in brawls between the gangs in order to secure recruits for their unit.<ref>War Office Papers. 1:998, Lieutenant General Parker to Barrington, 19 June 1778.</ref> Men would maim themselves to avoid the press gangs,<ref>War Office Papers, 1:1005, Oughton to Jenkinson, 27 May 1779</ref> while many deserted at the first opportunity.<ref>Andrews, Charles McLean (1912), "Guide to the materials for American history, to 1783, in the Public record office of Great Britain", Washington, D.C., Carnegie institution of Washington, Volume II, p. 32</ref> Pressed men were militarily unreliable; regiments with large numbers of such men were deployed to garrisons such as Gibraltar or the West Indies, purely to increase the difficulty in successfully deserting.<ref>War Office Papers, 4:966, Jenkinson to Amherst, 26 Oct. 1779</ref>
{{Main|African Americans in the Revolutionary War}}


] soldiers, including one from the ] on the left]]
By 1781, the Army numbered approximately 121,000 men globally,<ref name="British Army 1775–1783" /> 48,000 of whom were stationed throughout the Americas.<ref name="totallyhistory.com">{{cite web|url=http://totallyhistory.com/red-coats/|title=Red Coats Facts – British Soldiers in the American Revolution|work=totallyhistory.com}}</ref> Of the 171,000 sailors<ref name="Mackesy 1964 pp. 6, 176" /> who served in the Royal Navy throughout the conflict, around a quarter were pressed. Interestingly, this same proportion, approximately 42,000 men, deserted during the conflict.<ref name="Mackesy pp. 6, 176">Mackesy (1964), pp. 6, 176 (British seamen)</ref> At its height, the Navy had 94 ],<ref>Jonathan Dull, A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution (Yale University Press, 1985), p. 110.</ref> 104 ]<ref>Winfield, Rif, British Warships in the Age of Sail: 1714–1792 (Seaforth Publishing, 2007) {{ISBN|978-1-84415-700-6}}</ref> and 37 ]<ref>Winfield, Rif, British Warships in the Age of Sail 1714–1792: Design, Construction, Careers and Fates (Seaforth Publishing, 2007)</ref> in service.


When war began, the population of the Thirteen Colonies included an estimated 500,000 slaves, predominantly used as labor on ].<ref name="517PM">], p. 251</ref> In November 1775, Lord Dunmore, the royal governor of Virginia, issued a proclamation that promised freedom to any Patriot-owned slaves willing to bear arms. Although the announcement helped to fill a temporary manpower shortage, white Loyalist prejudice meant recruits were eventually redirected to non-combatant roles. The Loyalists' motive was to deprive Patriot ] of labor rather than to end slavery; Loyalist-owned slaves were returned.<ref name="CJ6XK">], pp. 167–168</ref>
] soldiers of the Leibregiment]]


The 1779 ] issued by Clinton extended the offer of freedom to Patriot-owned slaves throughout the colonies. It persuaded entire families to escape to British lines, many of which were employed growing food for the army by removing the requirement for military service. While Clinton organized the ], he also ensured fugitive slaves were returned to Loyalist owners with orders that they were not to be punished.<ref name="DKDsq">] "Black Loyalists"</ref> As the war progressed, service as regular soldiers in British units became increasingly common; Black Loyalists formed two regiments of the Charleston garrison in 1783.<ref name="bfNHp">], pp. 68–69</ref>
====== Loyalists and Hessians ======


Estimates of the numbers who served the British during the war vary from 25,000 to 50,000, excluding those who escaped during wartime. Thomas Jefferson estimated that Virginia may have lost 30,000 slaves to escapes.<ref name="zag2G">], p. 59</ref> In South Carolina, nearly 25,000 slaves (about 30 percent of the enslaved population) either fled, migrated, or died, which significantly disrupted the plantation economies both during and after the war.<ref name="yRG5O">], p. 73</ref>
In 1775, Britain unsuccessfully attempted to secure 20,000 mercenaries from ],<ref>Colonial Office Papers. Manuscripts in the Public Record Office, 5:92, Dartmouth to Howe, 5 Sept. 1775</ref> and the use of the ] from the Dutch Republic,<ref>Edler 2001, pp. 28–32</ref> such was the shortage of manpower. Parliament managed to negotiate treaties with the princes of German states for large sums of money, in exchange for ].<ref name="library.si.edu" /> In total, 29,875 troops were hired for British service from six German states; ] (5,723), ] (16,992), ] (2,422), ] (2,353), ] (1,225) and ] (1,160).<ref name="Lowell, Edward J 1884">Lowell, Edward J (1884), "The Hessians and the other German Auxiliaries of Great Britain in the Revolutionary War", Harper and Brothers Publishers, New York, Chapter II</ref> King George III, who also ruled ] as a ] of the ], was approached by Parliament to loan the government Hanoverian soldiers for service in the war. Hanover supplied 2,365 men in five ], however, the lease agreement permitted them to only be used in Europe.<ref>Knesebeck, Ernst von dem (1845), "Geschichte de churhannoverschen Truppen in Gibraltar, Minorca und Ostindien", Published by Im Verlage der Helwingschen Hof-Buchhandlung. '''Note:''' The strength of a Hanoverian battalion is listed as 473 men</ref>


]s were barred from the Continental Army until Washington convinced Congress in January 1778 that there was no other way to replace losses from disease and desertion. The ] formed in February included former slaves whose owners were compensated; however, only 140 of its 225 soldiers were black and recruitment stopped in June 1788.<ref name="Ltvqf">], p. 75</ref> Ultimately, around 5,000 African Americans served in the Continental Army and Navy in a variety of roles, while another 4,000 were employed in Patriot militia units, aboard privateers, or as teamsters, servants, and spies. After the war, a small minority received land grants or Congressional pensions; many others were returned to their masters post-war despite earlier promises of freedom.<ref name="aJJzP">], p. 356</ref>
Without any major allies,<ref name="Scott 1990"/> the manpower shortage became critical when France and Spain entered the war, forcing a major diversion of military resources from the Americas.<ref name="Ketchum 1997, p. 405–448"/><ref name="Higginbotham 1983, pp. 175–88"/> Recruiting adequate numbers of Loyalist militia in America proved difficult due to high Patriot activity.<ref name="Black 2001 p. 59">Black (2001), p.&nbsp;59. On militia see Boatner (1974), p.&nbsp;707, and Weigley (1973), ch.&nbsp;2.</ref> To bolster numbers, the British promised freedom and grants of land to slaves who ].<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/learning_history/revolution/dunsmore.cfm |title=Lord Dunmore's Proclamation |publisher=Digital History |accessdate=2007-10-18 |date=2007-10-18 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20080422231140/http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/learning_history/revolution/dunsmore.cfm |archivedate=April 22, 2008 |df= }}</ref> Approximately 25,000 Loyalists fought for the British throughout the war,<ref name="Savas and Dameron 2006, p. xli">Savas and Dameron (2006), p. xli</ref> and provided some of the best troops in the British service;<ref>Buchanan, 327</ref> the ], a mixed regiment of 250 ] and 200 infantry<ref>Babits, page 46, “British Legion Infantry strength at Cowpens was between 200 and 271 enlisted men”. However, this statement is referenced to a note on pages 175–176, which says, “The British Legion infantry at Cowpens is usually considered to have had about 200–250 men, but returns for the 25 December 1780 muster show only 175. Totals obtained by Cornwallis, dated 15 January, show that the whole legion had 451 men, but approximately 250 were dragoons”. There would therefore appear to be no evidence for putting the total strength of the five British Legion Light Infantry companies at more than 200.</ref> commanded by Banastre Tarleton, gained a fearsome reputation in the colonies, especially in the South.<ref name="rankin"></ref><ref>{{cite journal|last=Bass|first=Robert.D|title=''The Green Dragoon: The Lives of Banastre Tarleton and Mary Robinson ''|jstor= 23517100|date=August 1957|publisher=North Carolina Office of Archives and History}}</ref><ref>{{cite web|last=Agniel|first=Lucien|title=''The Late Affair Has Almost Broke My Heart: The American Revolution in the South, 1780–1781''|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K0MhAQAAIAAJ&pg=PA3254&lpg=PA3254&dq=THE+LATE+AFFAIR+HAS+ALMOST+BROKE+MY+HEART+lucien+agniel&source=bl&ots=Na-jbt0Jpw&sig=ROzmHZ8fAUAqj7Oxmbst81LMu8c&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CDkQ6AEwB2oVChMIhtOe-eSZyQIViAQaCh0McgEf#v=onepage&q=THE%20LATE%20AFFAIR%20HAS%20ALMOST%20BROKE%20MY%20HEART%20lucien%20agniel&f=false|date= June 1972|publisher=Chatham Press|accessdate=18 November 2015}}</ref>


As a Patriot victory became increasingly likely, the treatment of Black Loyalists became a point of contention; after the surrender of Yorktown in 1781, Washington insisted all escapees be returned but Cornwallis refused. In 1782 and 1783, around 8,000 to 10,000 freed blacks were evacuated by the British from Charleston, Savannah, and New York; some moved onto London, while 3,000 to 4,000 settled in Nova Scotia.<ref name="Bvc5o">], p. 61</ref> White Loyalists transported 15,000 enslaved blacks to Jamaica and the ]. The free Black Loyalists who migrated to the British West Indies included regular soldiers from Dunmore's ], and those from Charleston who helped garrison the ].<ref name="bfNHp" />
===== Leadership =====


===Native Americans===
Britain had a difficult time appointing a determined senior military leadership in America. Thomas Gage, Commander-in-Chief of North America at the outbreak of the war, was criticized for being too lenient on the rebellious colonists. Jeffrey Amherst, who was appointed Commander-in-Chief of the Forces in 1778, refused a direct command in America, due to unwillingness to take sides in the war.<ref>Ketchum (1997), p. 76</ref> Admiral ] similarly opposed a command, stating; "I cannot draw the sword in such a cause". The ] resigned his commission when his regiment was posted to America, while William Howe and John Burgoyne were opposed to military solutions to the crisis. Howe and Henry Clinton both stated they were unwilling participants, and were only following orders.<ref>Ketchum (1997), p. 77</ref>
{{Main|Category:Native Americans in the American Revolution}}
] ].|Colonel ] of the British-led ] ] in the war]]


Most Native Americans east of the Mississippi River were affected by the war, and many tribes were divided over how to respond. A few tribes were friendly with the colonists, but most Natives opposed the union of the Colonies as a potential threat to their territory. Approximately 13,000 Natives fought on the British side, with the largest group coming from the ] tribes who deployed around 1,500 men.<ref name="Greene p. 393">], p. 393</ref>
As was the case in many European armies, except the ], officers in British service could ] to ascend the ranks.<ref>Duffy, Christopher. The Military Experience in the Age of Reason. p. 61. {{ISBN|1-85326-690-6}}.</ref> Despite repeated attempts by Parliament to suppress it, the practise was common in the Army.<ref>Forteseue, The British Army, 1783–1802, p. 34</ref> Values of commissions varied, but were usually in line with social and military prestige, for example, regiments such as the ] commanded the highest prices.<ref name=cwsite>{{cite web|url=http://www.colonialwargaming.co.uk/Miscellany/Army/Commissions.htm |title=The Purchase of Officers' Commissions in the British Army |first=John |last=Armatys |first2=Robert George |last2=Cordery |publisher=Colonial Wargames |year=2005 |accessdate=10 June 2017|archiveurl=http://archive.is/3gHP|archivedate=July 28, 2012}}</ref> The lower ranks often regarded the treatment to high-ranking commissions by wealthier officers as "plums for consumption".<ref>Belcher, Volume I, p. 270</ref> Wealthy individuals lacking any formal military education, or practical experience, often found their way into positions of high responsibility, diluting the effectiveness of a regiment.<ref>{{cite book|author=Michael Lanning|title=American Revolution 100: The Battles, People, and Events of the American War for Independence, Ranked by Their Significance|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1GEs53wMr7EC&pg=PA193|year=2009|publisher=Sourcebooks|pages=193–96}}</ref> Though Royal authority had forbade the practise since 1711, it was still permitted for infants to hold commissions. Young boys, often orphans of deceased wealthy officers, were taken from their schooling and placed in positions of responsibility within regiments.<ref>Duncan, Volume II, p. 15</ref>


Early in July 1776, ] allies of Britain attacked the short-lived ] of ]. Their defeat splintered both Cherokee settlements and people, and was directly responsible for the rise of the ], who perpetuated the ] against American settlers for decades after hostilities with Britain ended.<ref name="finger2001">], pp. 43–64</ref>
===== Logistics =====


] and ] allies of Britain fought against Americans in Georgia and South Carolina. In 1778, a force of 800 Muscogee destroyed American settlements along the ] in Georgia. Muscogee warriors also joined ]'s raids into South Carolina and assisted Britain during the siege of Savannah.<ref name="KPNF9">], p. 198</ref> Many Native Americans were involved in the fight between Britain and Spain on the Gulf Coast and along the British side of the Mississippi River. Thousands of Muscogee, ], and ] fought in major battles such as the ], the ], and the ].<ref name="npQH7">], pp. 123–126</ref>
Logistical organization of eighteenth century armies was chaotic at best, and the British Army was no exception. No logistical corps existed in the modern sense; while on campaign in foreign territories such as America, horses, wagons, and drivers were frequently requisitioned from the locals, often by impressment or by hire.<ref>Duncan, Francis (1879). "History of the Royal Regiment of Artillery", Volume 1. J. Murray, p. 131, 303, 309</ref> No centrally organized medical corps existed. It was common for surgeons to have no formal medical education, and no diploma or entry examination was required. Nurses sometimes were apprentices to surgeons, but many were drafted from the women who ].<ref>Sergeant Lamb, "Journal of the American War", p. 75</ref> Army surgeons and doctors were poorly paid and were regarded as social inferiors to other officers.<ref>Duncan, History of the Royal Regiment of Artillery, Volume 2, p. 15</ref>


The Iroquois Confederacy was shattered as a result of the American Revolutionary War. The ], ], and ] tribes sided with the British; members of the ] fought on both sides; and many ] and ] sided with the Americans. To retaliate against raids on American settlement by Loyalists and their Indian allies, the Continental Army dispatched the Sullivan Expedition throughout New York to debilitate the Iroquois tribes that had sided with the British. Mohawk leaders ] and ] sided with the Americans and the British respectively, which further exacerbated the split.<ref name="Q9pmz">], pp. 200–203</ref>
] armed with ] muskets, c. 1790.]]
] in 1767, armed with a Brown Bess musket.]]


In the western theater, conflicts between settlers and Native Americans led to lingering distrust.<ref name="y9yCm">], p.</ref> In the 1783 Treaty of Paris, Great Britain ceded control of the disputed lands between the Great Lakes and the ], but Native inhabitants were not a part of the peace negotiations.<ref name="lsicb">], p. 24</ref> Tribes in the Northwest Territory joined as the ] and allied with the British to resist American settlement, and their conflict continued after the Revolutionary War as the ].<ref name="BnzRx">], pp. 354–355</ref>
The heavy personal equipment and wool uniform of the regular infantrymen were wholly unsuitable for combat in America, and the outfit was especially ill-suited to comfort and agile movement.<ref>Burgoyne, State of the Expedition, p. 148</ref> During the ] in late June 1778, the temperature exceeded 100°] (37.8°]) and is said to have claimed more lives through ] than through actual combat.<ref>{{cite web|title=Battle of Monmouth Courthouse|url=http://www.robinsonlibrary.com/america/unitedstates/1775/campaigns/monmouth.htm|website=Robinson Library|publisher=Self-published|accessdate=20 June 2017}}</ref> The standard-issue firearm of the British Army was the ]. Some officers preferred their troops to fire careful, measured shots (around two per minute), rather than rapid firing. A bayonet made firing difficult, as its cumbersome shape hampered ramming down the charge into the barrel.<ref>Lloyd, Ernest Marsh (1908), Review of the History of Infantry, p. 155</ref> British troops had a tendency to fire impetuously, resulting in inaccurate fire, a trait for which John Burgoyne criticized them during the Saratoga campaign.<ref>Howe, William, Orderly Book, p. 116</ref> Burgoyne instead encouraged bayonet charges to break up enemy formations,<ref>Howe, Orderly Book, 20 June 1777, p. 3.</ref> which was a preferred tactic in most European armies at the time.<ref>Trevelyan, Volume III, p. 6; Volume IV, p. 158</ref>


==Peace negotiations==
Every battalion in America had organized its own rifle company by the end of the war, although rifles were not formally issued to the army until the ] in 1801.<ref>Fortescue, The British Army, 1783–1802, p. 83.</ref> Flintlocks were heavily dependent on the weather; high winds could blow the gunpowder from the ],<ref>Sawyer, Charles Winthrop (1910), "Firearms in American History", p. 99</ref> while heavy rain could soak the ], ruining the powder and rendering the musket unable to fire.<ref>Trevelyan, Volume IV, p. 224</ref> Furthermore, flints used in British muskets were of notoriously poor quality; they could only be fired around six times before requiring resharpening, while American flints could fire sixty. This led to a common expression among the British: "Yankee flint was as good as a glass of grog".<ref>Trevelyan, Volume IV, p.34</ref>
{{Further|Treaty of Paris (1783)|l1=Treaty of Paris (1783)}}
]'' by ] portrays the ] of (left–right): ], ], ], ], and ]. The portrait was never completed because the British commissioners refused to pose. Laurens, pictured, was actually in London at the time it was painted.<ref name="Usbu7">]&nbsp;, pp. 435–436</ref>]]
], November 1783. ] is on left. The parade route in 1783 went from ] on ], then continued down ], ], ], and ended at Cape's Tavern on ].]]
The terms presented by the ] in 1778 included acceptance of the principle of self-government. Parliament would recognize Congress as the governing body, suspend any objectionable legislation, surrender its right to local colonial taxation, and discuss including American representatives in the House of Commons. In return, all property confiscated from Loyalists would be returned, British debts honored, and locally enforced martial law accepted. However, Congress demanded either immediate recognition of independence or the withdrawal of all British troops; they knew the commission were not authorized to accept these, bringing negotiations to a rapid end.<ref name="EVGwD">], p. 175</ref>


On February 27, 1782, a Whig motion to end the offensive war in America was carried by 19 votes.<ref name="PpAUy">], p. 246</ref> North resigned, obliging the king to invite ] to form a government; a consistent supporter of the Patriot cause, he made a commitment to U.S. independence a condition of doing so. George III reluctantly accepted and the ] took office on March 27, 1782; however, Rockingham died unexpectedly on July 1, and was replaced by ] who acknowledged American independence.<ref name="6fSnW">], p. 458</ref>
Provisioning troops and sailors proved to be an immense challenge, as the majority of food stores had to be shipped overseas from Britain.<ref>Minute Book of a Board of General Officers of the British Army in New York, 1781. New York Historical Society Collections, 1916, p. 81.</ref> The need to maintain Loyalist support prevented the Army from living off the land.<ref>Black (2001), p. 14</ref> Other factors also impeded this option; the countryside was too sparsely populated and the inhabitants were largely hostile or indifferent, the network of roads and bridges was poorly developed, and the area which the British controlled was so limited that foraging parties were frequently in danger of being ambushed.<ref>Correspondence of George III with Lord North, Volume II, p. 7, 52</ref> After France entered the war, the threat of the French navy increased the difficulty of transporting supplies to America. The food that could be bought in America was purchased at vastly inflated prices.<ref name="Minute Book 1916, p. 81">Minute Book (1916), p. 81</ref> Soldiers stationed in the West Indies perhaps suffered the worst; the garrison commander of Tobago, Barbados, and ] frequently complained of the near-total lack of regular supply from Britain, and the food that could be bought was so expensive that the pay of the troops was inadequate to cover the costs.<ref>War Office Papers, Manuscripts in the Public Record Office, 1:51, Graham to Jenkinson, 13 September and 23 November 1779; 1:51, Vaughan to Jenkinson, 2 November 1780</ref>


When Lord Rockingham was elevated to Prime Minister, Congress consolidated its diplomatic consuls in Europe into a peace delegation at Paris. The dean of the delegation was Benjamin Franklin. He had become a celebrity in the French Court, but he was also influential in the courts of ] and ]. Since the 1760s, Franklin had been an organizer of British American inter-colony cooperation, and then served as a colonial lobbyist to Parliament in London. John Adams had been consul to the Dutch Republic and was a prominent early New England Patriot. ] of New York had been consul to Spain and was a past president of the Continental Congress. As consul to the Dutch Republic, Henry Laurens had secured a preliminary agreement for a trade agreement. Although active in the preliminaries, he was not a signer of the conclusive treaty.<ref name="OtLkf" />
Food supplies were frequently in terrible condition, infested with mould, ], worms, and maggots.<ref>Treasury Papers, Manuscripts in the Public Record Office, 64:118, Chamier to Robinson, 9 Nov 1776</ref> Provisions were frequently destroyed by rats,<ref>Treasury Papers, 64:103, Day to Robinson, 22 Aug. 1777</ref> and their containers were too fragile to sustain a long ocean voyage or the rigors of campaigning.<ref>Treasury Papers, 64:200, Marsh to Navy Board, 17 Dec 1779</ref> The climate was also against the British in the southern colonies and the Caribbean, where the intense summer heat caused food supplies to sour and spoil.<ref>Treasury Papers, 64:120, Paumier to Robinson, 20 June & 7 August 1779</ref> British troops stationed in America were often on the verge of starvation.<ref>Treasury Papers, Manuscripts in the Public Record Office, 64:201, Wier to Robinson, 14 September 1780</ref>


The Whig negotiators included long-time friend of Franklin ], and ], who had negotiated Laurens' release from the Tower of London.<ref name="OtLkf" /> The Preliminary Peace signed on November 30 met four key Congressional demands: independence, territory up to the Mississippi, navigation rights into the Gulf of Mexico, and fishing rights in Newfoundland.<ref name="OtLkf" />
Life at sea was little better. Sailors and passengers were issued a daily food ration, largely consisting of ] and beer.<ref name=RoyNavyMus>{{cite web|url=http://www.royalnavalmuseum.org/info_sheet_ship_biscuit.htm |title=Ships Biscuits – Royal Navy hardtack |publisher=Royal Navy Museum |accessdate=2010-01-14 |deadurl=yes |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20091031064002/http://www.royalnavalmuseum.org/info_sheet_ship_biscuit.htm |archivedate=October 31, 2009 }}</ref> The hardtack was often infested by weevils and was so tough that it earned the nicknames "molar breakers" and "worm castles",<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.19thusregulars.com/html/hardtack.html |title=19th United States Infantry |publisher=19thusregulars.com |date= |accessdate=2013-12-25|archiveurl=http://archive.is/pOcB|archivedate=July 15, 2012}}</ref> and it sometimes had to be broken up with cannon shot. Meat supplies often spoiled on long voyages.<ref>Lowell, Edward J and Andrews, Raymond J (June 15, 1997) "The Hessians in the Revolutionary War", Corner House Pub, {{ISBN|978-0879281168}}, p. 56</ref> The lack of fresh fruit and vegetables gave rise to scurvy, one of the biggest killers at sea.<ref name="GARD2016" /> Rum was issued as part of a daily ration and was a popular drink among soldiers and sailors alike, often mixed with fresh water to make ].<ref>Blue, Anthony Dias (2004). The Complete Book of Spirits : A Guide to Their History, Production, and Enjoyment. HarperCollins. {{ISBN|0-06-054218-7}}, p. 77</ref><ref name="Minute Book 1916, p. 81"/>


British strategy was to strengthen the U.S. sufficiently to prevent France from regaining a foothold in North America, and they had little interest in these proposals.<ref name="6HMUl">], pp. 117–118</ref> However, divisions between their opponents allowed them to negotiate separately with each to improve their overall position, starting with the American delegation in September 1782.<ref name="s8bf9">], pp. 531–532</ref> The French and Spanish sought to improve their position by creating the U.S. dependent on them for support against Britain, thus reversing the losses of 1763.<ref name="0XLAe">], p. 85</ref> Both parties tried to negotiate a settlement with Britain excluding the Americans; France proposed setting the western boundary of the U.S. along the Appalachians, matching the British 1763 Proclamation Line. The Spanish suggested additional concessions in the vital Mississippi River Basin, but required the cession of ] in violation of the Franco-American alliance.<ref name="0XLAe" />
===== Discipline =====


Facing difficulties with Spain over claims involving the Mississippi River, and from France who was still reluctant to agree to American independence until all her demands were met, John Jay told the British that he was willing to negotiate directly with them, cutting off France and Spain, and Prime Minister Lord Shelburne, in charge of the British negotiations, agreed.<ref name="iRKom">]&nbsp;, pp. 221–323, 331–333</ref> Key agreements for the United States in obtaining peace included recognition of US independence; all of the territory east of the Mississippi River, north of Florida and south of Canada; and fishing rights in the ], off the coast of ] and in the ]. The United States and Great Britain were each given perpetual access to the Mississippi River.<ref name="XAtfM">]&nbsp;, pp. 144–151</ref><ref name="dKEt7">]&nbsp;, pp. 218–221</ref>
], 17th century]]


An Anglo-American Preliminary Peace was formally entered into in November 1782, and Congress endorsed the settlement on April 15, 1783. It announced the achievement of peace with independence, and the conclusive treaty was signed on September 2, 1783, in Paris, effective the following day when Britain signed its treaty with France. John Adams, who helped draft the treaty, claimed it represented "one of the most important political events that ever happened on the globe". Ratified respectively by Congress and Parliament, the final versions were exchanged in Paris the following spring.<ref name="9BwsN">], "Treaty of Paris"</ref> On November 25, the last British troops remaining in the U.S. were ] to Halifax.<ref name="Nuhdu">], p. 287</ref>
Discipline in the armed forces was harsh, and ] was used to punish even trivial offences, nor was it applied sparingly.<ref>Howe, (Sir) William, Orderly Book, edited by B. F. Stevens (London, 1890), pp. 263, 288</ref> For instance, during the Saratoga campaign, two redcoats received 1,000 lashes each for robbery,<ref>Burgoyne, John, Orderly Book, edited by E. B. O'Callaghan (Albany, 1860), p. 74.</ref> while another received 800 lashes for striking a superior officer.<ref>Howe, Orderly Book, pp 263, 288</ref> During the ], one soldier received 700 lashes for stealing a beehive, while another, whom had received only 175 strikes of his 400-lash sentence, spent three weeks in hospital from his injuries.<ref>Oman, Charles. Wellington's Army, 1809–1814. London: Greenhill, (1913) 1993. {{ISBN|0-947898-41-7}}, p. 246, 254</ref> The practise could often be a contentious source of resentment; during the ] in 1815, the commander of the ] was shot and killed by a soldier whom he had recently flogged.<ref>Regan, G. (2004). More Military Blunders. Carlton Books. {{ISBN|1-84442-710-2}}.</ref> Flogging was a common punishment in the Royal Navy, and came to be associated with the stereotypical hardiness of sailors.<ref>"". National Maritime Museum.</ref>


==Aftermath==
Despite the harsh discipline, a distinct lack of self-discipline pervaded all ranks. Soldiers had an intense passion for gambling, reaching such excesses that troops would often wager their own uniforms.<ref>Lamb, Memoir, p. 74</ref> Soldiers drank heavily, and was not exclusive to the lower ranks; William Howe was said to have seen many "crapulous mornings" while campaigning in New York. John Burgoyne drank heavily on a nightly basis towards the end of the Saratoga campaign. The two generals were also reported to have found solace with the wives of subordinate officers to ease the stressful burdens of command.<ref>Riedesel, Mrs. General, Letters and Journals, translated from the original German by W. L. Stone (Albany, 1867) p. 125</ref> During the Philadelphia campaign, British officers deeply offended local Quakers by entertaining their mistresses in the houses they had been quartered in.<ref>Stedman, Charles, History of the American War (London, 1794), Volume I, p. 309</ref> Despite such issues, British troops are reported to have been generally scrupulous in their treatment of non-combatants.<ref>Fortescue, The British Army, 1783–1802, p. 35</ref> This is contrasted by Hessian diaries, who wrote of their disapproval of British conduct towards the colonists, such as the destruction of property and the execution of prisoners.<ref>Steven Schwamenfeld."The Foundation of British Strength: National Identity and the Common British Soldier." Ph.D. diss., Florida State University 2007, p. 123-124</ref>
{{Main|American Revolution}}


===Territory===
The presence of Hessian soldiers caused considerable anxiety amongst the colonists, both Patriot and Loyalist, who viewed them as brutal mercenaries.<ref>Schwamenfeld (2007), p.123-124</ref> British soldiers were often contemptuous in their treatment of Hessian troops, despite orders from General Howe that "the English should treat the Germans as brothers". The order only began to have any real effect when the Hessians learned to speak a minimal degree of English, which was seen as a prerequisite for the British troops to accord them any respect.<ref>Schwamenfeld (2007), p. 123</ref>
The expanse of territory that was now the U.S. included millions of sparsely settled acres south of the Great Lakes line between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River, much of which was part of Canada. The tentative colonial migration west became a flood during the war.<ref name="0xR4w">]&nbsp;, p. 41</ref>


Britain's extended post-war policy for the U.S. continued to try to establish an ] below the Great Lakes as late as 1814 during the ]. The formally acquired western American lands continued to be populated by Indigenous tribes that had mostly been British allies.<ref name="lsicb" /> In practice the British refused to abandon the forts on territory they formally transferred. Instead, they provisioned military allies for continuing frontier raids and sponsored the Northwest Indian War (1785–1795). British sponsorship of local warfare on the U.S. continued until the Anglo-American ], authored by Hamilton, went into effect on February 29, 1796.<ref name="CrkMd">Benn 1993, p. 17</ref>{{Efn|For the thirteen years prior to the Anglo-American commercial ] of 1796 under President ], the British maintained five forts in New York state: two forts at northern Lake Champlain, and three beginning at ] stretching east along Lake Ontario. In the Northwest Territory, they garrisoned ] and ].<ref name="1S547">]&nbsp;, p. 45</ref>}}
During peacetime, the Army's idleness led to it becoming riddled with corruption and inefficiency, resulting in a myriad of administrative difficulties once campaigning began.<ref>Clayton, Anthony (2007). The British Officer: Leading the Army from 1660 to the Present. Routledge. {{ISBN|178159287X}}, p. 65</ref>


Of the European powers with American colonies adjacent to the newly created U.S., Spain was most threatened by American independence, and it was correspondingly the most hostile to it.{{Efn|There had been native-born Spanish (hidalgo) uprisings in several American colonies during the American Revolution, contesting mercantilist reforms of Carlos III that had removed privileges inherited from the Conquistadors among ]s, and they also challenged Jesuit dominance in the Catholic Church there. American ship captains were known to have smuggled banned copies of the Declaration of Independence into Spanish Caribbean ports, provoking Spanish colonial discontent.}} Its territory adjacent to the U.S. was relatively undefended, so Spanish policy developed a combination of initiatives. Spanish soft power diplomatically challenged the British territorial cession west to the Mississippi River and the previous northern boundaries of Spanish Florida.<ref name="ImmKb">]&nbsp;, p. 46</ref> It imposed a high tariff on American goods, then blocked American settler access to the port of New Orleans. At the same time, the Spanish also sponsored war within the U.S. by Indian proxies in its Southwest Territory ceded by France to Britain, then Britain to the Americans.<ref name="0xR4w" />
==== Strategic deficiencies ====


===Casualties and losses===
The British leadership soon discovered it had overestimated the capabilities of its own troops, while underestimating those of the colonists, causing a sudden re-think in British planning.<ref name="Ketchum208_9" /><ref name="Frothingham298"/> The ineffective initial response of British military and civil officials to the onset of the rebellion had allowed the advantage to shift to the colonists, as British authorities rapidly lost control over every colony.<ref name="John C. Miller 1959 410–12"/> A microcosm of these shortcomings were evident at the ]. It took ten hours for the British leadership to respond following the sighting of the Americans on the Charlestown Peninsula, giving the colonists ample time to reinforce their defenses.<ref name="French263">], pp. 263–265</ref> Rather than opt for a simple flanking attack that would have rapidly succeeded with minimal loss,<ref>Frothingham, p. 155</ref> the British decided on repeated frontal attacks. The results were telling; the British suffered 1,054 casualties of a force of around 3,000 after repeated frontal assaults.<ref>Frothingham pp. 191, 194</ref> The British leadership had nevertheless remained excessively optimistic, believing that just two regiments could suppress the rebellion in Massachusetts.<ref name="Frothingham156">], p. 156</ref><ref name=Ferling15>], p. 127-129</ref>
{{further|Prisoners in the American Revolutionary War}}
] in ]]]


The total loss of life throughout the conflict is largely unknown. As was typical in wars of the era, diseases such as smallpox claimed more lives than battle. Between 1775 and 1782, a ] throughout North America killed an estimated 130,000.<ref name="3kb8Q" />{{Efn|In addition to as many as 30% deaths in port cities, and especially high rates among the closely confined prisoner-of-war ships, scholars have reported large numbers lost among the Mexican population, and large percentage losses among the American Indian along trade routes, Atlantic to Pacific, Eskimo to Aztec.}} Historian ] suggests that Washington having his troops ] against the disease was one of his most important decisions.<ref name="VcQK9">], p. 87</ref>
Debate persists over whether a British defeat was a guaranteed outcome. ] argues that the odds were so long, the defeat of Britain was nothing short of a miracle.<ref>John E. Ferling, ''Almost A Miracle: The American Victory in the War of Independence'' (2009), pp. 562–77.</ref> ], however, considers that the odds always favored the Americans, and questions whether a British victory by any margin was realistic. Ellis argues that the British squandered their only opportunities for a decisive success in 1777, and that the strategic decisions undertaken by William Howe underestimated the challenges posed by the Americans. Ellis concludes that, once Howe failed, the opportunity for a British victory "would never come again".<ref name="Ellis 2013">{{cite book|author=Joseph J. Ellis|title=Revolutionary Summer: The Birth of American Independence|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z4RqZJzho1QC&pg=PR11|year=2013|publisher=Random House}}</ref> Conversely, the United States Army's official textbook argues that, had Britain been able to commit 10,000 fresh troops to the war in 1780, a British victory was within the realms of possibility.<ref name="Richard W. Stewart 2005 p. 103"> ch 4 "The Winning of Independence, 1777–1783" (2005), p. 103.</ref>


Up to 70,000 American Patriots died during active military service.<ref name="gNorb">], p.</ref> Of these, approximately 6,800 were killed in battle, while at least 17,000 died from disease. The majority of the latter died while ] of the British, mostly in the ] in New York Harbor.<ref name="hQzBc">], p.{{Page needed|date=May 2021}}</ref>{{Efn|If the upper limit of 70,000 is accepted as the total net loss for the Patriots, it would make the conflict proportionally deadlier than the ]. Uncertainty arises from the difficulties in accurately calculating the number of those who succumbed to disease, as it is estimated at least 10,000 died in 1776 alone.<ref name="duncan371" />}} The number of Patriots seriously wounded or disabled by the war has been estimated from 8,500 to 25,000.<ref name="Xwtjh">] p. 849</ref>
===== William Howe =====


The French suffered 2,112 killed in combat in the United States.<ref name="TO8lQ">], "Frenchmen who died"</ref>{{Efn|Elsewhere around the world, the French lost another approximately 5,000 total dead in conflicts 1778–1784.<ref name="TO8lQ" />}} The Spanish lost 124 killed and 247 wounded in West Florida.<ref name="White 2010, Essay">], "Essay"</ref>{{Efn|During the same time period in the ], the Dutch suffered around 500 total killed, owing to the minor scale of their conflict with Britain.<ref name="White 2010, Essay" />}}
] from 1775–1778]]


A British report in 1781 puts their total Army deaths at 6,046 in North America (1775–1779).<ref name="3kb8Q" />{{Efn|British returns in 1783 listed 43,633 rank and file deaths across the ].<ref name="VdGXi">], p.</ref> In the first three years of the Anglo-French War (1778), British list 9,372 soldiers killed in battle across the Americas; and 3,326 in the West Indies (1778–1780).<ref name="3kb8Q" /> In 1784, a British lieutenant compiled a detailed list of 205 British officers killed in action during British conflicts outside of North America, encompassing Europe, the Caribbean, and the East Indies.<ref name="g1sff">], pp. 203–205</ref> Extrapolations based upon this list puts British Army losses in the area of at least 4,000 killed or died of wounds outside of its North American engagements.<ref name="duncan371" />}} Approximately 7,774 Germans died in British service in addition to 4,888 deserters; among those labeled German deserters, however, it is estimated that 1,800 were killed in combat.<ref name="duncan371" />{{Efn|Around 171,000 ] served in the ] during British conflicts worldwide 1775–1784; approximately a quarter of whom had been ] into service. Around 1,240 were killed in battle, while an estimated 18,500 died from disease (1776–1780).<ref name="ICbFh">], p. 269</ref> The greatest killer at sea was ], a disease caused by ] deficiency.<ref name="HKwDq">], "Scurvy"</ref> It was not until 1795 that scurvy was eradicated from the ] after the Admiralty declared ] and ] were to be issued among the standard daily ] rations of sailors.<ref name="xPtQE">], p. 160</ref> Around 42,000 sailors ] worldwide during the era.<ref name="macksey6,176" /> The impact on merchant shipping was substantial; 2,283 were taken by American privateers.<ref name="OVxVT" /> Worldwide 1775–1784, an estimated 3,386 British ] were seized by enemy forces during the war among Americans, French, Spanish, and Dutch.<ref name="We1Cr">], p. 191</ref>}}
Historians such as Ellis and Stewart have observed that, under William Howe's command, the British squandered several opportunities to achieve a decisive victory over the Americans.<ref name="Richard W. Stewart 2005 p. 103"/><ref name="Ellis 2013" /> Throughout the New York and Philadelphia campaigns, Howe made several strategic errors, errors which cost the British opportunities for a complete victory. At ], Howe failed to even attempt an encirclement of Washington,<ref name="Battle of Long Island"/> and actively restrained his subordinates from mounting an aggressive pursuit of the defeated American army.<ref name="Adams, Charles Francis 1896 p. 657"/> At ], he refused to engage Washington's vulnerable army, and instead concentrated his efforts upon a hill which offered the British no strategic advantage.<ref name="Fischer 2004, pp. 102–11"/><ref name="Barnet Schecter 2002"/> After securing control of New York, Howe dispatched Henry Clinton to capture Newport, a measure which Clinton was opposed to, on the grounds the troops assigned to his command could have been put to better use in pursuing Washington's retreating army.<ref name="Ridpath 1915"/><ref>{{cite book|author=David McCullough|title=1776|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5LBVT46o5yQC&pg=PT122|year=2006|page=122}}</ref><ref name="Stedman, Charles 1794 p. 221"/> Despite the bleak outlook for the revolutionary cause<ref name="Fischer, pp. 138–142"/> and the surge of Loyalist activity in the wake of Washington's defeats,<ref name="American History 1982 p. 130"/> Howe made no attempt to mount an attack upon Washington while the Americans settled down into winter quarters, much to their surprise.<ref name="Lecky, William 1891 p. 57"/>


===Legacy===
During planning for the Saratoga campaign, Howe was left with the choice of committing his army to support Burgoyne, or capture Philadelphia, the revolutionary capital. Howe decided upon the latter, determining that Washington was of a greater threat.<ref name="Ketchum, 1999 p. 81"/> The decision left Burgoyne precariously isolated,<ref name="Martin, p. 11-15"/> and left the Americans confounded at the decision.<ref name="John E 2010"/> Alden argues Howe may have been motivated by ]; if Burgoyne was successful, he would receive the credit for a decisive victory, and not Howe.<ref name="Alden, 1954 p. 118"/> However, the confusion was further compounded by the lack of explicit and contradictory instructions from London.<ref>{{Cite book |last=Black |first=Jeremy |title=War for America: The Fight for Independence, 1775–1783 |publisher=St. Martin's Press |location=New York |year=1991 |isbn=0-312-06713-5 |ref=Black}}, p. 126</ref> When Howe launched his campaign, he took his army upon a time-consuming route through the Chesapeake Bay, rather than the more sensible choices of overland through New Jersey, or by sea through the Delaware Bay. The move left him unable to assist Burgoyne even if it was required of him. The decision so confused Parliament, that Howe was accused by Tories on both sides of the Atlantic of treason.<ref name="Campaign of 1777"/>
]'', meaning "A New Age Now Begins", is paraphrased from ]'s '']'', published January 10, 1776. "We have it in our power to begin the world over again", Paine wrote in it.<ref name="McDonald, Forrest pp. 6">McDonald, Forrest. ''Novus Ordo Seclorum: The Intellectual Origins of the Constitution,'' pp. 6–7, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1985. {{ISBN|0700602844}}.</ref>]]


The American Revolution set an example to overthrow both monarchy and colonial governments. The United States has the world's oldest written constitution, which was used as a model in other countries, sometimes word-for-word. The Revolution inspired revolutions in France, Haiti, Latin America, and elsewhere.<ref name="Xqvd2">], pp. 35, 134–149</ref>
During the Philadelphia campaign, Howe failed to pursue and destroy the defeated Americans on two occasions; once after the ],<ref name="Higginbotham pp. 181"/><ref name="Adams, Charles Francis p. 43"/> and again after the ].<ref name="books.google.co.uk"/> At the ], Howe failed to even attempt to exploit the vulnerable American rear,<ref>{{cite book|last=Cadwalader|first=Richard McCall|title=Observance of the One Hundred and Twenty-third Anniversary of the Evacuation of Philadelphia by the British Army. Fort Washington and the Encampment of White Marsh, November 2, 1777:|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kWhar7AYIwAC&pg=PA20|year=1901|pages=20–28|accessdate=January 7, 2016}}</ref> and then inexplicably ordered a retreat to Philadelphia after only minor skirmishes, astonishing both sides.<ref name="McGuire, p. 254"/> While the Americans wintered only twenty miles away, Howe made no effort to attack their camp, which critics argue could have ended the war.<ref name="Noel Fairchild Busch 1974"/><ref name="A Concluding Commentary"/><ref name="history.army.mil"/> Following the conclusion of the campaign, Howe resigned his commission, and was replaced by Henry Clinton on May 24, 1778.<ref name="Frances H. Kennedy 2014 163"/>


Although the Revolution eliminated many forms of inequality, it did little to change the status of women, despite the role they played in winning independence. Most significantly, it failed to end slavery. While many were uneasy over the contradiction of demanding liberty for some, yet denying it to others, the dependence of southern states on slave labor made abolition too great a challenge. Between 1774 and 1780, many of the states banned the importation of slaves, but the institution itself continued.<ref name="0skc6">]&nbsp;, pp. 96–97</ref> In 1782, Virginia passed a law permitting ] and over the next eight years more than 10,000 slaves were given their freedom.<ref name="DggJY">]&nbsp;, p. 97</ref> The number of abolitionist movements greatly increased, and by 1804 all the northern states had outlawed it.<ref name="wneY7">], pp. 3–8, 186–187</ref> However, slavery continued to be a serious social and political issue and caused divisions that would ultimately end in ].
Contrary to Howe's more hostile critics, however, there were strategic factors at play which impeded aggressive action. Howe may have been dissuaded from pursuing aggressive manoeuvres due to the memory of the grievous losses the British suffered at Bunker Hill.<ref>Frothingham pp. 152–153</ref><ref>Jackson, Kenneth T; Dunbar, David S (2005). Empire City: New York Through the Centuries. Columbia University Press. {{ISBN|978-0-231-10909-3}}, p. 20</ref> During the major campaigns in New York and Philadelphia, Howe often wrote of the scarcity of adequate provisions, which hampered his ability to mount effective campaigns.<ref>Colonial Office Papers, Manuscripts in the Public Record Office, 5:93, Howe to Dartmouth, 1st December 1775</ref> Howe's tardiness in launching the New York campaign, and his reluctance to allow Cornwallis to vigorously pursue Washington's beaten army, have both been attributed to the paucity of available food supplies.<ref>Colonial Office Papers, 5:93, Howe to Germain, 7 June and 7 July 1776</ref><ref>A View of the Evidence (London, 1783), p. 13</ref>


===Historiography===
During the winter of 1776–1777, Howe split his army into scattered cantonments. This decision dangerously exposed the individual forces to defeat in detail, as the distance between them was such that they could not mutually support each other. This strategic failure allowed the Americans to achieve victory at the ], and the concurrent ].<ref>Correspondence of George III with Lord North, Volume II, p. 57</ref> While a major strategic error to divide an army in such a manner, the quantity of available food supplies in New York was so low that Howe had been compelled to take such a decision. The garrisons were widely spaced so their respective foraging parties would not interfere with each other's efforts.<ref>Colonial Office Papers, 5:93, Howe to Germain, 30 Nov 1776</ref> Howe's difficulties during the Philadelphia campaign were also greatly exacerbated by the poor quality and quantity of available provisions.<ref>Stedman, American War, Volume I, p. 287</ref>
The body of historical writings on the American Revolution cite many motivations for the Patriot revolt.<ref name="g6SJo">Paul David Nelson, "British Conduct of the American Revolutionary War: A Review of Interpretations." ''Journal of American History'' 65.3 (1978): 623–653. {{JSTOR|1901416}}</ref> American Patriots stressed the denial of their constitutional ], especially "]." Contemporaries credit the ] with laying the intellectual, moral, and ethical foundations for the American Revolution among the ], who were influenced by the ] of ] and other Enlightenment writers and philosophers.


'']'' has long been cited as a major influence on Revolutionary-era American thinking, but historians David Lundberg and ] contend that Locke's '']'' was far more widely read.<ref>See David Lundberg and Henry F. May, "The Enlightened Reader in America", ''American Quarterly'', vol. 28, no. 2 (1976): 267.</ref> Historians since the 1960s have emphasized that the Patriot constitutional argument was made possible by the emergence of an American nationalism that united the Thirteen Colonies. In turn, that nationalism was rooted in a ] that demanded consent of the governed and deeply opposed ] control.<ref name="fcrPt">{{cite journal | last1 = Tyrrell | first1 = Ian | year = 1999 | title = Making Nations/Making States: American Historians in the Context of Empire | journal = Journal of American History | volume = 86 | issue = 3| pages = 1015–1044 | jstor=2568604| doi = 10.2307/2568604| issn = 0021-8723}}</ref> In Britain, on the other hand, republicanism was largely a fringe ideology since it challenged the aristocratic control of the ] and political system. Political power was not controlled by an aristocracy or nobility in the 13 colonies; instead, the colonial political system was based on the winners of free elections, which were open at the time to the majority of white men. In analysis of the Revolution, historians in recent decades have often cited three motivations behind it:<ref name="ZBA7A">Robin Winks, ed. ''Historiography'' (1999) 5:95</ref>
===== Clinton and Cornwallis =====
* The ] view places the American story in a broader context, including subsequent revolutions in France and Haiti. It tends to reintegrate the historiographies of the American Revolution and the British Empire.<ref name="ZJ2KF">{{cite journal | last1 = Cogliano | first1 = Francis D. | year = 2010 | title = Revisiting the American Revolution | journal = History Compass | volume = 8 | issue = 8| pages = 951–963 | doi=10.1111/j.1478-0542.2010.00705.x}}</ref><ref name="WWA5Z">Eliga H. Gould, Peter S. Onuf, eds. ''Empire and Nation: The American Revolution in the Atlantic World'' (2005)</ref><ref name="UTDV9">{{cite journal | last1 = Gould | first1 = Eliga H. | year = 1999 | title = A virtual nation: Greater Britain and the imperial legacy of the American Revolution | journal = American Historical Review | volume = 104 | issue = 2| pages = 476–489 | doi=10.2307/2650376| jstor = 2650376}}</ref>
* The "]" approach looks at community social structure to find cleavages that were magnified into colonial cleavages.
* The ideological approach that centers on republicanism in the United States.<ref name="Uo7j4">{{cite book|author1=David Kennedy|author2=Lizabeth Cohen|title=American Pageant|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MJ6aBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA156|year=2015|publisher=Cengage Learning|page=156|isbn=978-1305537422}}</ref> Republicanism dictated there would be no royalty, aristocracy or national church but allowed for continuation of the British common law, which American lawyers and jurists understood and approved and used in their everyday practice. Historians have examined how the rising American legal profession adopted British common law to incorporate republicanism by selective revision of legal customs and by introducing more choices for courts.<ref name="dd44y">Ellen Holmes Pearson. "Revising Custom, Embracing Choice: Early American Legal Scholars and the Republicanization of the Common Law", in Gould and Onuf, eds. ''Empire and Nation: The American Revolution in the Atlantic World'' (2005) pp. 93–113</ref><ref name="5N3hK">], ''Rise of the Legal Profession in America'' (1965) vol. 2.</ref>


===Revolutionary War commemoration stamps===
], who led British forces in the ].]]
After the first ] was issued in 1849, the ] frequently issued commemorative stamps celebrating people and events of the Revolutionary War. The first such stamp was the ] issue of 1926.<ref name="ULvJk">{{Cite book |last1=Houseman |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lhB5tAEACAAJ |title=Scott Specialized Catalogue of United States Stamps and Covers |last2=Kloetzel |publisher=Amos Media Company |year=2019 |isbn=978-0894875595 |quote=Stamps listed in chronological order}}</ref>


<gallery caption="Selected issues:" mode="packed" heights="120px">
In 1780, the primary British strategy hinged upon a Loyalist uprising in the south, for which Charles Cornwallis was chiefly responsible. After an encouraging success at ], Cornwallis was poised to invade North Carolina. However, any significant Loyalist support had been effectively destroyed at the ],<ref name="Buchanan, p. 241"/> and the British Legion, the cream of his army, had been decisively defeated at the ].<ref name="Buchanan, p. 326"/> Following both defeats, Cornwallis was fiercely criticized for detaching a significant portion of his army without adequate mutual support.<ref name="ReferenceA"/> Despite the defeats, Cornwallis chose to proceed into North Carolina, gambling his success upon a large Loyalist uprising which never materialized.<ref name="clements.umich.edu"/><ref name="Lumpkin 2000">Lumpkin, From Savannah to Yorktown: The American Revolution in the South (2000).</ref> As a result, subsequent engagements cost Cornwallis valuable troops he could not replace, as at the ],<ref name="MtVernon" /> and the Americans steadily wore his army down in an exhaustive ].<ref>Trevelyan, Sir George Otto (1914). George the Third and Charles Fox: The Concluding Part of The American Revolution. New York and elsewhere: Longmans, Green and Co.</ref> Cornwallis had thus left the Carolinas ripe for reconquest. The Americans had largely achieved this aim by the end of 1781, effectively confining the British to the coast, and undoing all the progress they had made in the previous year.<ref>Pancake, John (1985). This Destructive War. University of Alabama Press. {{ISBN|0-8173-0191-7}}., p. 221</ref><ref name="ReferenceB"/>


File:150th Anniversary of the Liberty Bell, 1926 Issue-2c.jpg|upright=1|The ] stamp, issued on the 150th anniversary of American independence in 1926
In a last-ditch attempt to win the war in the South, Cornwallis resolved to invade Virginia, in order to cut off the American's supply base to the Carolinas. Henry Clinton, Cornwallis' superior, strongly opposed the plan, believing the decisive confrontations would take place between Washington in the North.<ref name="ReferenceC"/> London had approved Cornwallis plan, however they had failed to include Clinton in the decision-making, despite his seniority over Cornwallis, leading to a muddled strategic direction.<ref name="Public Record Office"/> Cornwallis then decided to invade Virginia without informing Clinton of his intentions.<ref>Clinton, H.; ''The American Rebellion''. Note: This lack of notification was one of Clinton's main arguments in his own defense in the controversy that followed the surrender at Yorktown.</ref> Clinton, however, had wholly failed to construct a coherent strategy for British campaigning that year,<ref>{{cite book|last=Grainger|first=John|title=The Battle of Yorktown, 1781: a Reassessment|publisher=Boydell Press|year=2005|location=Woodbridge, NJ|isbn=978-1-84383-137-2|oclc=232006312}}, p. 29</ref> owing to his fractious relationship that he shared with Mariot Arbuthnot, his naval counterpart.<ref name="Billias 1969"/>
File:Saratoga 1777 Oriskany 1927 Issue-2c.jpg|upright=1|150th anniversary of the ] stamp featuring ]'s surrender, issued in 1927
File:Washington at Prayer Valley Forge 1928 Issue-2c.jpg|upright=1|] at prayer at ] stamp, issued in 1928
File:Yorktown 1931 Issue-2c.jpg|upright=1|150th anniversary of the ] stamp featuring ], ], and ], issued in 1931
</gallery>


==See also==
As the Franco-American army approached Cornwallis at Yorktown, he made no attempt to ] and engage before siege lines could be erected,<ref>Wickwire, Franklin and Mary (1970). Cornwallis: The American Adventure. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. {{OCLC|62690}}. p. 362</ref> despite the repeated urging of his subordinate officers.<ref name="Ketchum, p. 205"/> Expecting ] to soon arrive from Clinton, Cornwallis prematurely abandoned all of his outer defences, which were then promptly occupied by the besiegers, serving to hasten the British defeat.<ref>Lengel, Edward (2005). General George Washington. New York: Random House Paperbacks. {{ISBN|0-8129-6950-2}}., p. 337</ref> These factors contributed to the eventual surrender of Cornwallis' entire army, and the end of major operations in North America.<ref>Fleming, Thomas (1970). The Perils of Peace. New York: The Dial Press. {{ISBN|978-0-06-113911-6}}, p. 16</ref>
{{Div col}}
* ]: events, births, deaths, and other years
* ]


===Topics of the Revolution===
Like Howe before him, Clinton's efforts to campaign suffered from chronic supply issues. In 1778, Clinton wrote to Germain complaining of the lack of supplies, even after the arrival of a convoy from Ireland.<ref>Colonial Office Papers, 5:96, Clinton to Germain, 15 September 1778</ref> That winter, the supply issue had deteriorated so badly, that Clinton expressed considerable anxiety over how the troops were going to be properly fed.<ref>Colonial Office Papers, 5:97, Clinton to Germain, 15 December 1778</ref> Clinton was largely inactive in the North throughout 1779, launching few major campaigns. This inactivity was partially due to the shortage of food.<ref>Colonial Office Papers, 5:98, Haldimand to Clinton, 19 July and 29 August 1779</ref> By 1780, the situation had not improved. Clinton wrote a frustrated correspondence to Germain, voicing concern that a "fatal consequence will ensue" if matters did not improve. By October that year, Clinton again wrote to Germain, angered that the troops in New York had not received "an ounce" of that year's allotted stores from Britain.<ref>Colonial Office Papers, 5:100, Clinton to Germain, 31st October 1780</ref>
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


==== Campaign issues ==== ===Social history of the Revolution===
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


===Others in the American Revolution===
Suppressing a rebellion in America presented the British with major problems. The key issue was distance; it could take up to three months to cross the Atlantic, and, subsequently, orders from London were often outdated by the time they arrived.<ref>Black (2001), p. 39; Greene and Pole (1999), pp. 298, 306</ref> As the colonies had never been united in a homogeneous manner prior to the conflict, there was no centralized area of ultimate strategic importance. Traditionally, the fall of a capital city often signalled the end of a conflict,<ref>Rossman, Vadim (2016), "Capital Cities: Varieties and Patterns of Development and Relocation", Taylor & Francis, {{ISBN|1317562852}}, p. 2</ref> yet after the fall of major settlements such as New York, Philadelphia (which was the Patriot capital), and Charleston, the war continued unabated.<ref>Edward E. Curtis, The Organization of the British Army in the American Revolution, Conclusion, (Yale U.P. 1926), Retrieved 10 June 2017</ref> Britain's ability to project its power overseas lay chiefly in the power of the Royal Navy, allowing her to control major coastal settlements with relative ease, and enforce a strong blockade of colonial ports. However, the overwhelming majority of the American population was ], not urban. As a result, the American economy proved resilient enough to withstand the blockade's effects.<ref name="Pole 2004"/>
* ]
* ]


===Lists of Revolutionary military===
] soldiers fought alongside ] in the 1781 ], from '']'']]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


===Legacy and related===
The need to maintain Loyalist support prevented the British from using the harsh methods of suppressing revolts they had used in ] and ].<ref>Black (2001), p.&nbsp;14.</ref> For example, during an aborted attack on Charleston in 1779, British troops looted and pillaged the locals, enraging both Patriots and Loyalists.<ref>Wilson, David K (2005). The Southern Strategy: Britain's Conquest of South Carolina and Georgia, 1775–1780. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press. {{ISBN|1-57003-573-3}}. {{OCLC|232001108}}. p. 112</ref> Neutral colonists were often driven into the ranks of the Patriots when brutal combat broke out between Tories and Whigs across the Carolinas in the later stages of the war.<ref>Black (2001), pp. 14–16 (Harsh methods), pp. 35, 38 (slaves and Indians), p. 16 (neutrals into revolutionaries).</ref> Conversely, Loyalists were often emboldened, or at the very least sympathies to the Patriots dulled, when Patriots resorted to intimidating suspected Tories, such as destroying property, or ].<ref>Leonard Woods Larabee, Conservatism in Early American History (1948) pp 164–65</ref><ref>Calhoon, Robert M. The Loyalists in Revolutionary America, 1760–1781 (1973)</ref> The vastness of the American countryside, and the limited manpower available, meant the British could never simultaneously defeat the Americans, and occupy captured territory. One British statesman described the attempt as "like trying to conquer a map".<ref>Curtis, "The Organization of the British Army in the American Revolution, Conclusion</ref>
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{Div col end}}


==Notes==
Wealthy Loyalists wielded great in influence in London,<ref name="jstor.org"/> and were successful in convincing the British that sympathies to the Crown was the majority view in the colonies.<ref>Lorenzo Sabine, , Vol. I (1864) p. 48; Sabine adds they were certainly wrong.</ref> Consequently, British planners pinned the success of their strategies on popular uprisings of Loyalists,<ref name="Wickwire p.315"/><ref name="clements.umich.edu"/> which never transpired on the scale required.<ref name="Lumpkin 2000"/> Historians have estimated that Loyalists made up only 15–20% of the population,<ref>Greene and Pole (1999), p. 235</ref> and that they continued to deceive themselves on their level of support as late as 1780.<ref name="Lecky1891">{{cite book|author=William Edward Hartpole Lecky|title=A History of England: In the Eighteenth Century|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m3cUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA139|year=1891|page=139}}</ref> The British soon discovered that any significant level of organized Loyalist activity would require the continued presence of British regulars,<ref>Black (2001), p.&nbsp;12.</ref> which presented them with a major dilemma. The manpower the British had available was insufficient to both protect Loyalist territory, and counter American advances, often leaving the former vulnerable to the latter.<ref>Black (2001), p.&nbsp;13–14.</ref> The vulnerability of Loyalist militias was repeatedly demonstrated in the South, where they suffered strings of defeats to their Patriot neighbors. The most crucial juncture of this was at Kings Mountain; the victory of the Patriot partisans irreversibly crippled Loyalist military capability in the South.<ref name="Buchanan, p. 241"/>
{{Notelist}}
{{reflist|group=N}}


==Citations==
Upon the entry of France and Spain into the conflict, the British were forced to severely limit the number of troops and warships it sent to North America, in order to defend other key territories, and the British mainland.<ref name="Ketchum 1997, p. 405–448"/><ref name="Higginbotham 1983, pp. 175–88"/> As a result, King George III abandoned any hope of subduing America militarily, while it had a European war to contend with.<ref>Ferling (2007), p. 294</ref> The small size of Britain's army left it unable to concentrate its resources primarily in one ], as it had done in the Seven Years' War, leaving it at a critical disadvantage.<ref name="Cf., Richard Pares, 1936: 429–65"/> Compelled to disperse its troops from the Americas, to Europe, to the East Indies, these forces were thus unable to mutually assist each other, precariously exposing them to defeat in detail.<ref name="Alfred Thayer Mahan 1890 p. 534"/> In North America, the immediate strategic focus of the French, Spanish and British shifted to Jamaica,<ref>Dull, (1985) p. 244</ref> whose sugar exports were more valuable to the British than the economy of the Thirteen colonies combined.<ref name="O'Shaughnessy p. 208"/>
:''Year dates enclosed in denote year of original printing''
{{reflist|1=20em}}


==Bibliography==
Following the end of the war, Britain had lost some of her most populous colonies. However, the economic effects of the loss were negligible in the long-term; just thirty-two years after the end of the conflict, Britain had risen to become the foremost global superpower.<ref>Tellier, L.-N. (2009). Urban World History: an Economic and Geographical Perspective. Quebec: PUQ. p. 463. {{ISBN|2-7605-1588-5}}.</ref>
{{Main|Bibliography of the American Revolutionary War}}
<!-- Deny Citation Bot-->
<!--works cited in the notes-->
{{Refbegin|30em}}
<!-- A -->
* {{Cite web |last=Abrams |first=Creighton W. |title=The Yorktown Campaign, October 1781 |url=https://armyhistory.org/the-yorktown-campaign-october-1781/ |access-date=May 20, 2020 |website=National Museum, United States Army, Army Historical Foundation |date=July 16, 2014 |ref=abrams }}
* {{Cite book |last=Adams |first=Charles Francis |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CgALAAAAIAAJ |title=Proceedings of the Massachusetts Historical Society: Campaign of 1777 |publisher=Massachusetts Historical Society |year=1911 |volume=44 |ref=adams1911 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Adams |first=Charles Francis |url=https://archive.org/details/americanhistoric18951896jame/page/n7/mode/2up/search/mcclary |title=The American historical review |publisher=Kraus Reprints |location=New York |year=1963 |editor-last=Jameson, J. Franklin |ref=adams63 |author-mask=2 |orig-year=1895–1896 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Alden |first=John R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gV0xAAAAQBAJ |title=A History of the American Revolution |publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group |year=1969 |isbn=978-0306803666 |ref=alden1969 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Alden |first=John R. |title=American Revolution, Seventeen Seventy Five to Seventeen Eighty-Three |publisher=Harper Collins |year=1976 |isbn=978-0061330117 |ref=alden1976}}
* {{Cite book |last=Alexander |first=Leslie |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uivtCqOlpTsC&pg=PA356 |title=Encyclopedia of African American History |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2010 |isbn=978-1851097746 |page=356 |ref=alexander2010 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IlpnDwAAQBAJ |title=The American Revolution: A World War |date=2018 |publisher=Smithsonian Institution |isbn=978-1588346599 |editor-last=Allison |editor-first=David K |ref=Allison&Ferreiro2018 |editor2-last=Ferreiro |editor2-first=Larrie D. }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ammerman |first=David |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1Eh2AAAAMAAJ |title=In the Common Cause: American Response to the Coercive Acts of 1774 |publisher=Norton |year=1974 |isbn=978-0813905259 |location=New York |ref=ammerman }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Armour |first=Alexander W. |date=October 1941 |title=Revolutionary War Discharges |journal=William and Mary Quarterly |publisher=Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture |volume=21 |issue=4 |pages=344–360 |doi=10.2307/1920145 |jstor=1920145 |ref=armour1941}}
* {{Cite book |last=Archuleta |first=Roy A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UPE8yotFAT4C |title=Where We Come from |year=2006 |isbn=978-1424304721 |page=69 |publisher=Where We Come From, collect. |ref=roy2006 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Atwood |first=Rodney |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GejQdlQrD-kC |title=The Hessians: Mercenaries from Hessen-Kassel in the American Revolution |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0521526371 |ref=atwood2002 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Axelrod |first=Alan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iBvtuSWgt_QC |title=The Real History of the American Revolution: A New Look at the Past |publisher=Sterling Publishing Company, Inc. |year=2009 |isbn=978-1402768163 |ref=axelrod2009 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Axelrod |first=Alan |title=Mercenaries: A guide to Private Armies and Private Military Companies |publisher=SAGE Publications |year=2014 |isbn=978-1608712489 |author-mask=2 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EWQXBAAAQBAJ |ref=axelrod2014 }}


<!-- B -->
=== Patriots ===
* {{Cite book |last=Babits |first=Lawrence E. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bUpBDwAAQBAJ&q=Tarleton |title=A Devil of a Whipping: The Battle of Cowpens |publisher=University of North Carolina Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0807887660 |ref=babits }}
{{Main|Continental Army|Minutemen}}
* {{Cite book |last=Bailyn |first=Bernard |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pct726HjrHIC |title=To Begin the World Anew: The Genius and Ambiguities of the American Founders |publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group |year=2007 |isbn=978-0307429780 |ref=bailyn2007 }}
]]]
* {{Cite journal |last=Baer |first=Friederike |date=Winter 2015 |title=The Decision to Hire German Troops in the War of American Independence: Reactions in Britain and North America, 1774–1776 |journal=Early American Studies |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |volume=13 |issue=1 |pages=111–150 |doi=10.1353/eam.2015.0003 |jstor=24474906 |ref=baer2015 |s2cid=143134975}}
The Americans began the war with significant disadvantages compared to the British. They had no national government, no national army or navy, no financial system, no banks, no established credit, and no functioning government departments, such as a treasury. The Congress tried to handle administrative affairs through legislative committees, which proved inefficient. The state governments were themselves brand new and officials had no administrative experience. In peacetime the colonies relied heavily on ocean travel and shipping, but that was now shut down by the British blockade and the Americans had to rely on slow overland travel.
* {{Cite book |last=Baker |first=Mark Allen |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9gB3CQAAQBAJ |title=Spies of Revolutionary Connecticut: From Benedict Arnold to Nathan Hale |date=2014 |publisher=The History Press |isbn=978-1626194076 |location=Charleston, South Carolina |ref=baker2014 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Bass |first=Robert D. |date=October 1957 |title=The Green Dragoon: The Lives of Banastre Tarleton and Mary Robinson |journal=The North Carolina Historical Review |publisher=North Carolina Office of Archives and History |volume=34 |issue=4 |pages=548–550 |jstor=23517100 |ref=bass}}
* {{cite journal |last=Beerman |first=Eric |title="Yo Solo" Not "Solo": Juan Antoniao Riano |url=https://palmm.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/ucf%3A25449/datastream/OBJ/view |journal=The Florida Historical Quarterly |date=October 1979 |publisher=Florida Historical Society |issn=0015-4113 |access-date=June 1, 2021 |ref=beerman1979 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Belcher |first=Henry |url=https://archive.org/details/firstamericanciv01belcuoft/page/n6/mode/2up |title=The first American Civil War, first period 1775–1778 |publisher=London, MacMillan |year=1911 |volume=1 |ref=belcher1 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Bell |first=William Gardner |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Xwyykzbi4pUC&pg=PA3 |title=Commanding Generals and Chiefs of Staff, 1775–2005: Portraits & Biographical Sketches of the United States Army's Senior Officer |year=2005 |publisher=Government Printing Office |isbn=978-0160873300 |ref=bell2005 }}
* {{Cite thesis |last=Bellot |first=LJ |title=Canada v Guadeloupe in Britain's old colonial empire: the Peace of Paris of 1763 |date=1960 |publisher=Rice Institute |url=https://scholarship.rice.edu/bitstream/handle/1911/89064/RICE0099.pdf?sequence=1 |type=PhD |ref=bellot }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Bemis |first1=Samuel Flagg |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ENgUAAAAIAAJ |title=The American Secretaries of State and Their Diplomacy |last2=Ferrell |first2=Robert H. |publisher=Pageant Book Company |year=1958 |ref=bemis1958 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Benn |first=Carl |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bf66Rh7QuMcC |title=Historic Fort York, 1793–1993 |publisher=Toronto: Dundurn Press Ltd. 1 |year=1993 |isbn=0920474799 |ref=benn1993 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Berkin |first=Carol |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=gCES-ZwlN3MC |title=Revolutionary Mothers. Women in the Struggle for America's Independence |publisher=Alfred A. Knopf |year=2005 |isbn=1400041635 |location=New York |ref=berkin2005 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Bibko |first=Julia |year=2016 |title=The American Revolution and the Black Loyalist Exodus |url=http://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/hashtaghistory/vol1/iss1/5 |journal=History: A Journal of Student Research |volume=1 |issue=1 |ref=bibko2016 |access-date=November 11, 2020 |archive-date=April 12, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210412064945/https://digitalcommons.brockport.edu/hashtaghistory/vol1/iss1/5/ |url-status=dead }}
* {{Cite book |last=Bicheno |first=Hugh |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xw2hAgAAQBAJ |title=Rebels and Redcoats: The American Revolutionary War |publisher=HarperCollins |year=2014 |isbn=978-0007390915 |ref=bicheno14 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Billias |first=George Athan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0euvXS-AwD4C |title=George Washington's Opponents: British Generals and Admirals in the American Revolution |publisher=University of California |year=1969 |ref=billias1969 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Black |first=Jeremy |title=Parameters of British Naval Power, 1650–1850 |publisher=University of Exeter Press |year=1992 |isbn=978-0859893855 |editor-last=Michael Duffy |location=Exeter, UK |pages=95–120; here: 105 |chapter=Naval Power, Strategy and Foreign Policy, 1775–1791 |ref=black1992 |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ysC9rOCxGhgC }}
* {{Cite book |last=Black |first=Jeremy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=owQaAQAAIAAJ |title=War for America: The Fight for Independence, 1775–1783 |publisher=Sutton Publishing |year=2001 |isbn=978-0750928083 |ref=black2001 |author-mask=2 |author-link=Jeremy Black (historian) |orig-year=1991 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Black |first=Jeremy |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EIst_CSWOqIC |title=Fighting for America: The Struggle for Mastery in North America, 1519–1871 |date=2011 |publisher=Indiana University Press |isbn=978-0253005618 |ref=Black2011 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Boatner |first=Mark M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hQN2AAAAMAAJ |title=Encyclopedia of the American Revolution' |publisher=D. McKay Company |year=1974 |isbn=978-0679504405 |ref=boatner74 |orig-year=1966 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Borick |first=Carl P. |title=A Gallant Defense: the Siege of Charleston, 1780 |publisher=University of South Carolina Press |year=2003 |isbn=978-1570034879 |oclc=5051139 |ref=borick2003}}
* Britannica.com {{cite web |title= François Joseph Paul, count de Grasse |date= 2021 |url= https://www.britannica.com/biography/Francois-Joseph-Paul-comte-de-Grasse-marquis-de-Grasse-Tilly |publisher= Britannica.com |page= Wikisourse |ref= degrasseEB2021 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Brown |first=Weldon A |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BoYlAQAAMAAJ |title=Empire Or Independence A Study in the Failure Of Reconciliation 1774–1783 |publisher=Kennikat Press |year=1941 |ref=brown41 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Buchanan |first=John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zHh2AAAAMAAJ |title=The Road to Guilford Courthouse: The American Revolution in the Carolinas |publisher=John Wiley & Sons |year=1997 |isbn=978-0471164029 |ref=buchanan97 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Burgoyne |first=John |url=https://archive.org/details/orderlybookoflie00burg |title=Orderly book of Lieut. Gen. John Burgoyne, from his entry into the state of New York until his surrender at Saratoga, 16th Oct. 1777 |publisher=Albany, N.Y., J. Munsell |year=1860 |editor-last=O'Callaghan, E. B. |ref=burgoyne1860 |author-mask=2 |author-link=John Burgoyne }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=c5tNAAAAcAAJ |title=Annual Register: World Events, 1783 |publisher=Jay Dodsley |year=1785 |editor-last=Burke, Edmond |location=London |ref=Burke1785 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Burrows |first=Edwin G. |author-link=Edwin G. Burrows |date=Fall 2008 |title=Patriots or Terrorists |url=http://www.americanheritage.com/content/patriots-or-terrorists |url-status=live |journal=American Heritage |series=58 |issue=5 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130323233806/http://www.americanheritage.com/content/patriots-or-terrorists |archive-date=March 23, 2013 |access-date=November 29, 2014 |ref=burrows2008a }}
* {{Cite book |last=Burrows |first=Edwin |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=vpUs4J8XEXoC |title=Forgotten Patriots: The Untold Story of American Prisoners During the Revolutionary War |publisher=Basic Books |location=New York |year=2008 |isbn=978-0786727049 |ref=burrows2008b |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Butterfield |first=Consul W. |url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/007936660 |title=History of George Rogers Clark's Conquest of the Illinois and the Wabash Towns 1778–1779 |publisher=Heer |year=1903 |location=Columbus, Ohio |quote=online at Hathi Trust |ref=butterfield }}


<!-- C -->
However, the Americans had multiple advantages that in the long run outweighed the initial disadvantages they faced. The Americans had a large prosperous population that depended not on imports but on local production for food and most supplies, while the British were mostly shipped in from across the ocean. The British faced a vast territory far larger than Britain or France, located at a far distance from home ports. Most of the Americans lived on farms distant from the seaports—the British could capture any port but that did not give them control over the hinterland. They were on their home ground, had a smoothly functioning, well organized system of local and state governments, newspapers and printers, and internal lines of communications. They had a long-established system of local militia, previously used to combat the French and Native Americans, with companies and an officer corps that could form the basis of local militias, and provide a training ground for the national army created by Congress.<ref name="autogenerated1">Pole and Greene, eds. '' Companion to the American Revolution'', ch. 36–39.</ref>
* {{Cite book |last=Cadwalader |first=Richard McCall |url=https://archive.org/details/pennsylvaniasoc00socigoog |title=Observance of the One Hundred and Twenty-third Anniversary of the Evacuation of Philadelphia by the British Army: Fort Washington and the Encampment of White Marsh, November 2, 1777 |publisher=Press of the New Era Printing Company |year=1901 |pages=–28 |ref=cadwalader1901 |access-date=January 7, 2016 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Calhoon |first=Robert McCluer |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Zy53AAAAMAAJ |title=The Loyalists in Revolutionary America, 1760–1781 |date=1973 |publisher=Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc. |isbn=978-0801490088 |quote=The Founding of the American Republic Series |ref=Calhoon1973 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Calloway |first=Colin G. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XtxG369-VHQC&q=mercenaries |title=The Scratch of a Pen: 1763 and the Transformation of North America |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0195331271 |ref=calloway2007 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Cannon |first1=John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9vL8CgAAQBAJ |title=The Oxford Companion to British History |last2=Crowcroft |first2=Robert |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-0199677832 |edition=2nd |ref=cannon2015 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Carp |first=E. Wayne |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DL66YCXMbZ8C |title=To Starve the Army at Pleasure: Continental Army Administration and American Political Culture, 1775–1783 |publisher=UNC Press Books |year=1990 |isbn=978-0807842690 |ref=carp1990 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Carroll |first=Francis M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZiEkygEACAAJ |title=A Good and Wise Measure: The Search for the Canadian-American Boundary, 1783–1842 |publisher=U of Toronto Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-0802083586 |ref=carroll2001 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Cashin |first=Edward J. |date=26 March 2005 |title=Revolutionary War in Georgia |url=https://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/revolutionary-war-georgia |access-date=21 September 2020 |website=New Georgia Encyclopedia |quote=Revolution & Early Republic, 1775–1800 |ref=cashin }}
* {{Cite book |last=Cave |first=Alfred A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iiZoWyv77qQC&pg=PP1 |title=The French and Indian War |publisher=Greenwood Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0313321689 |location=Westport, Connecticut; London |ref=cave2004 }}
* {{Cite book |editor-last=Chambers |editor-first=John Whiteclay II |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=O69xjgEACAAJ |title=The Oxford Companion to American Military History |publisher=] |year=1999 |isbn=978-0195071986 |ref=chambers1999 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Chandler |first=Jonathan |year=2017 |title=To become again our brethren': Desertion and community during the American Revolutionary War, 1775–83 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PEvdvQEACAAJ |journal=Historical Research |publisher=Oxford University Press |volume=90 |issue=March 2017 |pages=363–380 |doi=10.1111/1468-2281.12183 |access-date=March 20, 2020 |ref=chandler |doi-access=free }}
* {{Cite book |last=Chávez |first=Thomas E. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z96CAwAAQBAJ&q=ireland |title=Spain and the Independence of the United States: An Intrinsic Gift |publisher=UNM Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0826327956 |ref=chavez }}
* {{Cite book |last=Chartrand |first=René |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JUQ8vgAACAAJ |title=Gibraltar 1779–1783: The Great Siege |publisher=Bloomsbury US |year=2006 |isbn=978-1841769776 |ref=chartrand63 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Chernow |first=Ron |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=r3-rsrDiE5cC |title=Washington: A Life |publisher=Penguin Press |year=2010 |isbn=978-1594202667 |ref=chernow2010 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Clayton |first=Anthony |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=HlDJAwAAQBAJ |title=The British Officer: Leading the Army from 1660 to the present |publisher=Routledge |year=2014 |isbn=978-1317864448 |ref=clayton2014 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Clode |first=Charles M. |url=https://archive.org/details/militaryforcesc02clodgoog/page/n4/mode/2up |title=The military forces of the crown; their administration and government |publisher=London, J. Murray |year=1869 |volume=1 |ref=clode1869a }}
* {{Cite book |last=Clodfelter |first=Micheal |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kNzCDgAAQBAJ |title=Warfare and Armed Conflicts: A Statistical Encyclopedia of Casualty and Other Figures, 1492–2015 |publisher=McFarland |year=2017 |isbn=978-1476625850 |edition=4th |ref=clodfelter2017 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Conway |first=Stephen |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ghkm8IxFCQIC |title=The British Isles and the War of American Independence |date=2002 |publisher=OUP Oxford |isbn=978-0199254552 |ref=conway }}
* {{Cite book |last=Cogliano |first=Francis D. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QMAKWDQt1LAC |title=Revolutionary America, 1763–1815: A Political History |publisher=Francis and Taylor |year=2003 |isbn=978-1134678693 |ref=cogliano2003 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Corwin |first=Edward Samuel |url=https://archive.org/details/frenchpolicyamer00corwuoft |title=French policy and the American Alliance of 1778 |date=1916 |publisher=Princeton University Press |quote=online at Internet Archive |ref=corwin }}
* {{Cite book |last=Crocker |first=H.W. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bQNwDwAAQBAJ |title=Don't Tread On Me: A 400-year History of American at War, from Indian Fighting to Terrorist Hunting |publisher=Three Rivers Press |year=2006 |isbn=978-1400053643 |page=51 |ref=crocker }}
* {{Cite book |last=Curtis |first=Edward E. |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.89355/page/n165/mode/2up?q=The+failure+of+British+arms |title=The Organization of the British Army in the American Revolution, Conclusion |publisher=Yale University Press |year=1926 |ref=curtis1926 }}


<!-- D -->
Motivation was a major asset. The Patriots wanted to win; over 200,000 fought in the war; 25,000 died. The British expected the Loyalists to do much of the fighting, but they did much less than expected. The British also hired German mercenaries to do much of their fighting.<ref name="Michael Lanning 2009 195–96"/>
* {{Cite book |last=Dale |first=Anderson |url=https://archive.org/details/battleofyorktown0000ande |title=The Battle of Yorktown |publisher=HarperCollins |year=2005 |isbn=978-0836853933 |location=New York |ref=dale2005 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Daughan |first=George |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pFmJ9HTq7QIC |title=If By Sea: The Forging of the American Navy – from the Revolution to the War of 1812 |publisher=Basic Books |year=2011 |isbn=978-0465025145 |oclc=701015376 |ref=daughan2011 |orig-year=2008 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Davenport |first1=Frances G |url=https://archive.org/details/europeantreaties04daveuoft/page/144/mode/2up |title=European Treaties Bearing on the History of the United States and Its Dependencies |last2=Paullin |first2=Charles O. |year=1917 |volume=IV |publisher=Washington, D.C. Carnegie Institution of Washington |ref=davenport1917 }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/000774193 |title=Documents of the American Revolution, 1779–1783 |series=Vol. 16 has title:Documents of the American Revolution, 1779–1780 |date=1972–1981 |publisher=Irish University Press |editor-last=Davies, K.G. |volume=12, 15, 17, 18 |location=Shannon |isbn=978-0716520856 |oclc=836225 |quote=Colonial Office Series: Great Britain, America and Canada |ref=daviesk1972 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Davis |first1=Lance E |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=AyeqDTmM7BIC |title=Naval Blockades in Peace and War: An Economic History since 1750 |last2=Engerman |first2=Stanley L |date=2006 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1139458481 |ref=davisengerman2006 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Davis |first=Burke |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pT92AAAAMAAJ |title=George Washington and the American Revolution |publisher=Random House |year=1975 |isbn=978-0394463889 |ref=davis75 }}
* Dictionary of American Biography {{Cite web |title=Jean Baptiste Donatien De Vimeur Rochambeau |date=1936 |url=https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/BT2310004552/GPS?u=wikipedia&sid=GPS&xid=744d6016 |access-date=June 1, 2021 |publisher=Charles Scribner's Sons |series=Gale in Context |ref=rochDAB }}
* {{Cite news |last=Deane |first=Mark |date=May 14, 2018 |title=That time when Spanish New Orleans helped America win independence |work=WGNO-ABC-TV |url=https://wgno.com/news-with-a-twist/nola-300-that-time-when-spanish-new-orleans-helped-america-win-independence/ |access-date=6 October 2020 |quote=Exhibit at the Cabildo Museum, 'Recovered Memories: Spain, New Orleans, and the Support for the American Revolution' |ref=Deane2018 }}{{Dead link|date=September 2024 |bot=InternetArchiveBot |fix-attempted=yes }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/parliamentaryre11parlgoog/page/n2/mode/2up |title=Parliamentary Register, House of Commons, Fifteenth Parliament of Great Britain |year=1781 |editor-last=Debrett, J. |volume=1 |publisher=Printed for J. Almon |ref=Debrett1781 }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc1.$b750334&view=1up&seq=5 |title=The correspondence of King George the Third with Lord North from 1768 to 1783 |year=1867 |editor-last=Donne, W. Bodham |volume=2 |publisher=J. Murray |quote=online at Hathi Trust |ref=donne }}
* {{Cite book |last=Duffy |first=Christopher |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zZiRAgAAQBAJ |title=The Military Experience in the Age of Reason, 1715–1789 |publisher=Routledge |year=2005 |isbn=978-1135794583 |ref=duffy1987 |orig-year=1987 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Dull |first=Jonathan R |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2WF9BgAAQBAJ |title=The French Navy and American Independence: A Study of Arms and Diplomacy, 1774–1787 |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=2015 |isbn=978-0691069203 |location=Princeton, NJ |oclc=1500030 |ref=dull1975 |orig-year=1975 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Dull |first=Jonathan R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W86WS9Z0ycYC |title=A Diplomatic History of the American Revolution |publisher=Yale University Press |year=1987 |isbn=978-0300038866 |ref=dull1987 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Duncan |first=Louis Caspar |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Tj0JAAAAIAAJ |title=Medical Men in the American Revolution, 1775–1783 |publisher=Medical field service school |year=1931 |ref=duncan1931 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Dunkerly |first=Robert M. |date=April 2, 2014 |title=8 Fast Facts about Camp Followers |url=https://allthingsliberty.com/2014/04/8-fast-facts-about-camp-followers/ |access-date=August 23, 2019 |publisher=Journal of the American Revolution |ref=dunkerly }}


<!-- E -->
At the onset of the war, the Americans had no major international allies. Battles such as the ], the ] and even defeats such as the ]<ref name="Trevelyan, p. 249">Trevelyan, p. 249.</ref> proved decisive in gaining the attention and support of powerful European nations such as France and Spain, who moved from covertly supplying the Americans with weapons and supplies, to overtly supporting them militarily, moving the war to a global stage.<ref name="K405_48">], pp. 405–48.</ref>
* {{cite book|author=Eelking, Max von|title=The German Allied Troops in the North American War of Independence, 1776–1783|url=https://archive.org/details/germanalliedtroo00eelk/page/n11/mode/2up|others=Translated from German by ]|year=1893|publisher=Joel Munsell's Sons, Albany, NY.|lccn=72081186|ref=eelking1893}}
* {{Cite thesis |last=Eclov |first=Jon Paul |title=Informal Alliance: Royal Navy And U.S. Navy Co-Operation Against Republican France During The Quasi-War And Wars Of The French Revolution |date=2013 |publisher=University of North Dakota |url=https://commons.und.edu/theses/1417 |type=PhD |ref=eclov2013 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Edler |first=Friedrich |url=https://archive.org/details/dutchrepublic00edlerich/page/n8/mode/2up |title=The Dutch Republic and The American Revolution |publisher=University Press of the Pacific |year=2001 |isbn=0898752698 |ref=edler |orig-year=1911 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ellis |first=Joseph J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2Y9Rko9sT3kC |title=His Excellency: George Washington |year=2004 |publisher=Knopf Doubleday Publishing |isbn=978-1400032532 |ref=ellis2004 |author-link=Joseph Ellis }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ellis |first=Joseph J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=z4RqZJzho1QC |title=Revolutionary Summer: The Birth of American Independence |publisher=Random House |year=2013 |isbn=978-0307701220 |ref=ellis2013 |author-mask=2 }}
* Encyclopædia Britannica {{cite EB1911|wstitle= Estaing, Charles Hector, Comte d' |volume= 09 | page = 789 |short=x |ref=estaingEB1911}}
* {{Cite book |last=Everest |first=Allan Seymour |title= Moses Hazen and the Canadian Refugees in the American Revolution| publisher=Syracuse University Press |year=1977|isbn=978-0815601296 |ref=everest1977}}


<!-- F -->
The new Continental Army suffered significantly from a lack of an effective training regime, and largely inexperienced officers and sergeants. The inexperience of its officers was compensated for in part by its senior officers; officers such as ], ], ], ] and ] all had military experience with the British Army during the ]. The Americans solved their training dilemma during their stint in Winter Quarters at Valley Forge, where they were relentlessly drilled and trained by General ], a veteran of the famed Prussian General Staff. He taught the Continental Army the essentials of military discipline, drills, tactics and strategy, and wrote the ].<ref>Philander D. Chase. "Steuben, Friedrich Wilhelm von";
* {{Cite book |last=Faust |first=Albert Bernhardt |url=https://archive.org/details/germanelementinu00faus |title=The German element in the United States |publisher=Boston : Houghton Mifflin Co. |year=1909 |ref=faust1909 |author-link=Albert Bernhardt Faust }}
.
* {{Cite book |last=Ferling |first=John |url=https://archive.org/details/leapindark00ferl |title=A Leap in the Dark: The Struggle to Create the American Republic |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2003 |isbn=978-0199728701 |ref=ferling2003 }}
Accessed January 29, 2015.</ref> When the Army emerged from Valley Forge, it proved its ability to equally match the British troops in battle when they fought a successful strategic action at the ].<ref>Ferling, John (2007), pp. 294–95"</ref>
* {{Cite book |last=Ferling |first=John E. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lyjjEsqlqo0C |title=Almost a Miracle |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0199758470 |ref=ferling2007 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ferling |first=John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=P0fCBwAAQBAJ |title=Whirlwind: The American Revolution and the War That Won It |publisher=Bloomsbury Publishing, US |year=2015 |isbn=978-1620401736 |ref=ferling2015 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Fernández y Fernández |first=Enrique |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ND93AAAAMAAJ |title=Spain's Contribution to the independence of the United States: An Intrinsic Gift |date=2004 |publisher=University of New Mexico Press |isbn=978-0826327949 |ref=fernández1885 |orig-year=1885 }}
* {{cite book |last=Field |first=Edward |title=Esek Hopkins, Commander-in-Chief of the Continental Navy During the American Revolution, 1775 to 1778: Master Mariner, politician, Brigadier General, Naval Officer, and Philanthropist |publisher=Preston & Rounds Company |year=1898 |url=https://archive.org/details/esekhopkinsco00fiel/page/n7/mode/2up |ref=field }}
* {{cite book |last=Finger |first=John |title-link=Tennessee Frontiers: Three Regions in Transition |title=Tennessee Frontiers: Three Regions in Transition |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-0253108722 |ref=finger2001}}
* {{cite book |last=Fischer |first=David Hackett |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Oreq1YztDcQC |title=Washington's Crossing |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0195170344 |ref=fischer2004 |author-link=David Hackett Fischer }}
* {{cite book |last=Fischer |first=Joseph R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_7ikGwAACAAJ |title=A Well-Executed Failure: The Sullivan Campaign against the Iroquois |publisher=University of South Carolina Press |year=2008 |isbn=978-1570038372 |ref=fischer2008 }}
* {{cite book |last=Fiske |first=John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XCcQAAAAYAAJ |title=''The American Revolution: In Two Volumes'' |date=1891 |publisher=The Riverside Press |volume=1 |location=Cambridge, MA |ref=fiske1891 |author-link=John Fiske (philosopher) }}
* {{cite book |last=Fiske |first=John |title=Harpers' Encyclopaedia of United States History |volume=9 |date=1902 |publisher=Harper & brothers |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=0sJAAQAAMAAJ&pg=PA516 |ref=fiske1902 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{cite book |last=Fleming |first=Thomas |title=New Jersey in the American Revolution |publisher=Rivergate Books, Rutgers University Press |year=2005 |isbn=0813536022 |editor-last=Barbara J. Mitnick |ref=fleming |orig-year=1973}}
* {{cite book |last=Fleming |first=Thomas |title=Washington's Secret War |publisher=HarperCollins |year=2006 |isbn=978-0060829629 |ref=fleming2006 |author-mask=2}}
* {{cite book |last=Fortescue |first=John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1GlKAAAAYAAJ&q=Bednore%201783&pg=PA489 |title=A history of the British army |year=1902 |volume=3 |ref=fortescue }}
* {{cite book |last1=Freeman |first1=Douglas Southall |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=7hWBcg2iLooC |title=Washington |last2=Harwell |first2=Richard Barksdale |publisher=Simon and Schuster |year=2011 |isbn=978-1439105337 |quote=An abridgement in one volume by Richard Harwell of the seven-volume biography of George Washington |ref=harwell2011 }}
* {{cite book |last=French |first=Allen |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZYwGAQAAIAAJ |title=General Gage's Informers |publisher=University of Michigan Press |year=1932 |ref=french1932 }}
* {{cite book |last=Frothingham |first=Richard |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Cu9BAAAAIAAJ |title=History of the Siege of Boston, and of the Battles of Lexington, Concord, and Bunker Hill: also an Account of the Bunker Hill Monument |publisher=Little, Brown, & Company |year=1903 |via=Google Books ebook |ref=Frothingham }}


<!-- G -->
] in 1775]]
* {{cite book |last=Gabriel |first=Michael P. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Xpx2CQAAQBAJ&q=mercenaries |title=The Battle of Bennington: Soldiers and Civilians |publisher=The History Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-1609495152 |ref=gabriel2012 }}
When the war began, the 13 colonies lacked a professional army or navy. Each colony sponsored local ]. Militiamen were lightly armed, had little training, and usually did not have uniforms. Their units served for only a few weeks or months at a time, were reluctant to travel far from home and thus were unavailable for extended operations, and lacked the training and discipline of soldiers with more experience. If properly used, however, their numbers could help the Continental armies overwhelm smaller British forces, as at the ] of ], ] and ], and the ]. Both sides used partisan warfare but the Americans effectively suppressed Loyalist activity when ] were not in the area.<ref name="Black 2001 p. 59"/>
* {{cite book |last=Gaff |first=Alan D. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QEI11WSV3WcC&q=Augustin |title=Bayonets in the Wilderness. Anthony Waynes Legion in the Old Northwest |publisher=University of Oklahoma Press |year=2004 |isbn=978-0806135854 |location=Norman |ref=gaff }}
* {{Cite archive |author1=George III, his Britannic Majesty |author2=Commissioners of the United States of America |item=Preliminary Articles of Peace |date=30 November 1782 |url=https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/prel1782.asp |access-date=6 October 2020 |collection=18th Century; British-American Diplomacy |institution=Yale Law School Avalon Project |ref=geoIII1782 |quote=Nine articles}}
* {{Cite book |last=Glattharr |first=Joseph T. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XedxagDKH7EC |title=Forgotten Allies: The Oneida Indians and the American Revolution |publisher=Hill & Wang |year=2007 |isbn=978-0809046003 |ref=glatthaar }}
* {{Cite book |last=Golway |first=Terry |title=Washington's General: Nathanael Greene and the Triumph of the American Revolution |date=2005 |publisher=Henry Holt and Company, LLC |isbn=0805070664 |ref=golway2005}}
* {{Cite web |last=Goos |first=Norman |title=A Very Large British Military Investment for Very Little Practical Profit |url=https://www.sar.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Battle-at-Chestnut-Neck-by-Norman-Goos.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/https://www.sar.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Battle-at-Chestnut-Neck-by-Norman-Goos.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |access-date=5 December 2020 |website=Sons of the American Revolution |ref=goos }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Gordon |first1=John W. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UYqYDMxOcc4C |title=South Carolina and the American Revolution: A Battlefield History |last2=Keegan |first2=John |year=2007 |publisher=Univ of South Carolina Press |isbn=978-1570034800 |ref=gordon }}
* {{Cite book |last=Grainger |first=John D. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mUO8ulaX2PsC |title=The Battle of Yorktown, 1781: A Reassessment |publisher=Boydell Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-1843831372 |ref=grainger2005 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Greene |first=Francis Vinton |url=https://archive.org/details/generalgreene00greeuoft/page/n8/mode/2up |title=General Greene |publisher=New York : D. Appleton & Co. |year=1913 |ref=fgreene1913 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Greene |first1=Jack P. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xK1NuzpAcH8C |title=A Companion to the American Revolution |last2=Pole |first2=J.R. |publisher=Blackwell Publishers |year=2008 |isbn=978-0470756447 |quote=Collection of essays focused on political and social history. |ref=jgreene2008 |orig-year=2000 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Grenier |first=John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=JGCin1JJp8cC&q=bird |title=The First Way of War: American War Making on the Frontier, 1607–1814 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-1139444705 |ref=grenier }}
* {{Cite map |last1=Gutman |first1=Alejandro |last2=Avanzati |first2=Beatriz |title=Native North American Languages Distribution |url=http://www.languagesgulper.com/eng/Northmap.html |publisher=A. Gutman & B. Avanzati |date=2013 |access-date=3 September 2020 |ref=gutman }}


<!-- H -->
Seeking to coordinate military efforts, the ] established a regular army on June 14, 1775, and appointed ] as commander-in-chief. The development of the Continental Army was always a work in progress, and Washington used both his regulars and state militia throughout the war.
* {{cite journal |last=Harrington |first=Hugh T. |date=January 2013 |title=The strange oddessy of George Merchant |url=https://allthingsliberty.com/2013/01/the-strange-odyssey-of-george-merchant-rifleman/ |journal=Journal of the American Revolution |ref=harrington2018 }}
* {{cite book |last=Harrison |first=Lowell Hayes |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hKsQ7yKYkaoC&q=Henry+Hamilton |title=George Rogers Clark and the War in the West |publisher=University Press of Kentucky |year=2001 |isbn=978-0813190143 |ref=harrison2001 }}
* {{cite book |last=Harvey |first=Robert |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YMWSDwAAQBAJ |title=A Few Bloody Noses: The American Revolutionary War |date=2004 |publisher=Robinson |isbn=978-1841199528 |ref=Harvey2004 }}
* {{cite book |last=Hazard |first=Samuel |url=https://archive.org/details/B-001-003-105/mode/2up |title=Hazard's Register of Pennsylvania |publisher=W.F. Geddes |year=1829 |volume=4 |ref=hazard54 }}
* {{cite book |last=Herring |first=George C. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=fODT-qOVoiIC |title=From Colony to Superpower: U.S. Foreign Relations since 1776 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2011 |isbn=978-0199765539 |quote=Oxford History of the United States Book 12 |ref=herring2011 |orig-year=2008 }}
* {{cite book |last=Hibbert |first=Christopher |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ShQAtAEACAAJ |title=George III: A Personal History |publisher=Basic Books |year=2000 |isbn=978-0465027248 |ref=hibbert2000 }}
* {{cite book |last=Hibbert |first=Christopher |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZwGSAwAAQBAJ |title=Redcoats and Rebels |publisher=Pen and Sword |year=2008 |isbn=978-1844156993 |ref=hibbert |author-mask=2 }}
* {{cite book |last=Higginbotham |first=Don |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UGYqAAAAYAAJ |title=The War of American Independence: Military Attitudes, Policies, and Practice, 1763–1789 |publisher=Northeastern University Press |year=1983 |isbn=0930350448 |ref=higginbotham1983 |author-link=Don Higginbotham |orig-year=1971 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Higginbotham |first=Don |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=NzZD0Wh99HEC |title=George Washington and the American Military Tradition |publisher=University of Georgia Press |year=1987 |isbn=978-0820324005 |ref=higginbotham1987 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Hoffman |first=Ronald |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=hwKoMgAACAAJ |title=Diplomacy and Revolution: The Franco-American Alliance of 1778 |date=1981 |publisher=University of Virginia Press |isbn=978-0813908649 |ref=hoffman }}
* {{Cite book |last=Hogeland |first=William |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=j-hQDQAAQBAJ |title=Autumn of the Black Snake |publisher=Farrar, Straus and Giroux |year=2017 |isbn=978-0374107345 |location=New York |ref=hogeland2017 }}
* {{cite book |last=Horn |first=Pierre L. |title=Marquis de Lafayette |author-link= |publisher=New York : Chelsea House Publishers |year=1989 |isbn=978-1555468132 |url=https://archive.org/details/marquisdelafayet0000horn |ref=horn1989 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Howat |first=Kenna |date=9 November 2017 |title=Revolutionary Spies: Women Spies of the American Revolution |url=https://www.colonialwilliamsburg.org/trend-tradition-magazine/spring-2017/fighting-common-soldier/ |access-date=23 August 2019 |website=National Women's History Museum |ref=howat2017 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Hubbard |first=Robert Ernest |title=Major General Israel Putnam: Hero of the American Revolution |publisher=McFarland & Company, Inc. |year=2017 |isbn=978-1476664538 |location=Jefferson, North Carolina |ref=hubbard2017}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Hunt |first=Paula D. |date=June 2015 |title=Sybil Ludington, the Female Paul Revere: The Making of a Revolutionary War Heroine |journal=The New England Quarterly |volume=88 |issue=2 |pages=187–222 |doi=10.1162/tneq_a_00452 |issn=0028-4866 |ref=hunt2015 |s2cid=57569643|doi-access=free }}


<!-- I -->
Three current branches of the ] trace their institutional roots to the American Revolutionary War; the ] comes from the ], formed by a resolution of the Continental Congress on June 14, 1775. The ] recognizes October 13, 1775 as the date of its official establishment, the passage of the resolution of the Continental Congress at Philadelphia that created the ].<ref name=Establish>{{Cite web|url=http://www.history.navy.mil/faqs/faq59-13.htm|title=Establishment of the Navy, 13&nbsp;October 1775|publisher=United States Navy|accessdate=November 5, 2009}}</ref> And the ] traces its institutional roots to the ] of the war, formed by a resolution of the Continental Congress on November 10, 1775, a date regarded and celebrated as the birthday of the Marine Corps. At the beginning of 1776, Washington's army had 20,000 men, with two-thirds enlisted in the Continental Army and the other third in the various state militias.<ref name="Tread">Crocker (2006), p.&nbsp;51.</ref> At the end of the American Revolution in 1783, both the ] and Continental Marines were disbanded. About 250,000 men served as regulars or as militiamen for the Revolutionary cause in the eight years of the war, but there were never more than 90,000 men under arms at one time. About 55,000 American sailors served aboard privateers during the war.<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.usmm.org/revolution.html |title=Privateers or Merchant Mariners help win the Revolutionary War |publisher=Usmm.org |date= |accessdate=May 8, 2013}}</ref> The American privateers had almost 1,700 ships, and they captured 2,283 enemy ships.<ref name="John Pike"/> ] became the first great American naval hero, capturing ] on April 24, 1778, the first victory for any American military vessel in British waters.<ref>Higginbotham (1983), pp.&nbsp;331–46.</ref>
* {{Cite book |last=Ingrao |first=Charles W. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=PdXBnelX89YC&q=%22mercenary+state%22 |title=The Hessian Mercenary State: Ideas, Institutions, and Reform Under Frederick II, 1760–1785 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |year=2003 |isbn=978-0521533225 |ref=ingrao2003 }}
* {{Cite magazine |last=Inman |first=George |date=1903 |title=Losses of the Military and Naval Forces Engaged in the War of the American Revolution |url=https://archive.org/stream/pennsylvaniamaga27hist#page/176/mode/1up |magazine=The Pennsylvania Magazine of History and Biography |volume=XXVII |issue=1 |pages=176–205 |quote=open access online at Internet Archive |ref=inman }}


<!-- J -->
Armies were small by European standards of the era, largely attributable to limitations such as lack of powder and other logistical capabilities on the American side.<ref>Boatner (1974), p.&nbsp;264 says the largest force Washington commanded was "under 17,000"; Duffy (1987), p.&nbsp;17, estimates Washington's maximum was "only 13,000 troops".</ref> It was also difficult for Great Britain to transport troops across the Atlantic and they depended on local supplies that the Patriots tried to cut off. By comparison, Duffy notes that ] usually commanded from 23,000 to 50,000 in battle.{{citation needed|date=November 2012}} Both figures pale in comparison to the armies that were fielded in the early 19th century, where troop formations approached or exceeded 100,000 men.
* {{Cite book |last1=Jackson |first1=Kenneth T. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rI_S-HgFdccC |title=Empire City: New York Through the Centuries |last2=Dunbar |first2=David S. |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-0231109093 |ref=jackson2005 }}
* {{Cite book |last=James |first=James Alton |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yoUUngEACAAJ |title=The Life of George Rogers Clark |publisher=Literary Licensing |year=2013 |isbn=978-1494118921 |ref=james2013 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Jasanoff |first=Maya |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uGKsn09oVwQC |title=Liberty's Exiles: American Loyalists in the Revolutionary World |publisher=Vintage Books |year=2012 |isbn=978-1400075478 |ref=jasanoff2012 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Jefferson |first=Thomas |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W_5ZDwAAQBAJ |title=The Papers of Thomas Jefferson, Volume 4: October 1780 to February 1781 |publisher=Princeton University Press |year=2018 |isbn=978-0691184692 |editor-last=Julian P. Boyd |ref=jefferson1780 |author-link=Thomas Jefferson }}
* {{Cite book |last=Johnston |first=Henry Phelps |url=https://archive.org/details/battleofharlemhe00john_0/page/n10/mode/2up |title=The Battle of Harlem Heights |publisher=Columbia University Press |year=1897 |ref=johnston1897 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Jones |first=Howard |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TFyLOUrdGFwC&q=crucible+of+power |title=Crucible of Power: A History of American Foreign Relations to 1913 |publisher=Scholarly Resources Inc. |year=2002 |isbn=978-0842029162 |page=5 |ref=jones2002 }}


<!-- K -->
=== African Americans ===
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t3SDQgfxsCIC |title=A Necessary Evil?: Slavery and the Debate Over the Constitution |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=1995 |isbn=978-0945612339 |editor-last=Kaminski |editor-first=John P. |ref=kaminski1995 }}
] shows a black infantryman from the ].]]
* {{Cite journal |last=Kaplan |first=Lawrence S. |date=September 1983 |title=The Treaty of Paris, 1783: A Historiographical Challenge |journal=International History Review |publisher=Taylor & Francis, Ltd. |volume=5 |pages=431–442 |doi=10.1080/07075332.1983.9640322 |jstor=40105317 |ref=lskaplan1983 |number=3}}
]—slave and free—served on both sides during the war. The British recruited slaves belonging to ] masters and promised freedom to those who served by act of Lord ]. Because of manpower shortages, George Washington lifted the ban on black enlistment in the Continental Army in January 1776. Small all-black units were formed in ] and ]; many slaves were promised freedom for serving. Some of the men promised freedom were sent back to their masters, after the war was over, out of political convenience. Another all-black unit came from ] with French colonial forces. At least 5,000 black soldiers fought for the Revolutionary cause.<ref>Kaplan and Kaplan (1989), pp.&nbsp;64–69.</ref><ref>{{cite book|author=Leslie Alexander|title=Encyclopedia of African American History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uivtCqOlpTsC&pg=PA356|year=2010|publisher=ABC-CLIO|page=356}}</ref>
* {{Cite book |last=Katcher |first=Philip |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5Ld2AAAAMAAJ |title=Encyclopedia of British, Provincial, and German Army Units, 1775–1783 |date=1973 |publisher=Stackpole Books |isbn=978-0811705424 |ref=katcher }}
* {{cite CE1913|wstitle=Jean-Baptiste-Donatien de Vimeur, Count de Rochambeau |volume= 13 |last= Keiley |first= Jarvis|ref=keiley1912 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Kelly |first1=James |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=4wMaAQAAIAAJ |title=Jamestown, Quebec, Santa Fe: Three North American Beginnings |last2=Smith |first2=Barbara Clark |date=2007 |publisher=Smithsonian |isbn=978-1588342416 |ref=kelly }}
* {{Cite book |last=Kennedy |first=Frances H. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=rTSTAwAAQBAJ |title=The American Revolution: A Historical Guidebook |publisher=Oxford UP |year=2014 |isbn=978-0199324224 |page=163 |ref=kennedy2014 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ketchum |first=Richard M |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZWf2AwAAQBAJ |title=The Winter Soldiers: The Battles for Trenton and Princeton |publisher=Henry Holt and Company (reprint of 1973) |year=2014 |isbn=978-1466879515 |ref=ketchum73 |author-link=Richard M. Ketchum |orig-year=1973 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ketchum |first=Richard M |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=w00MBAAAQBAJ |title=Saratoga: Turning Point of America's Revolutionary War |publisher=Macmillan |year=1997 |isbn=978-0805046816 |ref=ketchum97 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ketchum |first=Robert M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QGf2AwAAQBAJ&q=frontal |title=Decisive Day: The Battle for Bunker Hill |publisher=Henry Holt and Company |year=2014 |isbn=978-1466879508 |ref=ketchum2014a |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ketchum |first=Richard M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CwEDBAAAQBAJ&q=6,000 |title=Victory at Yorktown: The Campaign That Won the Revolution |publisher=Henry Holt and Company |year=2014 |isbn=978-1466879539 |ref=ketchum2014b |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Kolchin |first=Peter |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=F3nMRwAACAAJ |title=American Slavery: 1619–1877 |publisher=New York: Hill and Wang |year=1994 |isbn=978-0809015542 |ref=kolchin1994 }}, p.&nbsp;73
* {{Cite book |last=Knesebeck |first=Ernst von dem |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eNF3DgAAQBAJ&q=Hanover |title=Geschichte der kurhannoverschen Truppen: in Gibraltar, Menorca und Ostindien |publisher=Im Verlage der Helwingschen Hof-Buchhandlung |year=2017 |isbn=978-9925057382 |ref=ernst |orig-year=1845 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Kupperman |first=Karen Ordahl |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lIp7_e8KMJ0C |title=The Jamestown Project |publisher=Harvard University Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0674027022 |ref=kupperman }}


<!-- L -->
Tens of thousands of slaves escaped during the war and joined British lines; others simply moved off in the chaos. For instance, in South Carolina, nearly 25,000 slaves (30% of the enslaved population) fled, migrated or died during the disruption of the war.<ref>Peter Kolchin, ''American Slavery: 1619–1877'', New York: Hill and Wang, 1994, p. 73</ref> This greatly disrupted plantation production during and after the war. When they withdrew their forces from Savannah and Charleston, the British also evacuated 10,000 slaves belonging to Loyalists.<ref>Kolchin, p.73</ref> Altogether, the British evacuated nearly 20,000 blacks at the end of the war. More than 3,000 of them were freedmen and most of these were resettled in Nova Scotia; other blacks were sold in the West Indies.<ref>{{cite book|author=William Weir|title=The Encyclopedia of African American Military History|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WEXj4gHHARgC&pg=PA32|year=2004|publisher=Prometheus Books|pages=31–32}}</ref><ref>Cassadra Pybus, "Jefferson's Faulty Math: the Question of Slave Defections in the American Revolution", ''William and Mary Quarterly'' (2005) 62#2 pp: 243–264. </ref>
* {{Cite book |last1=Lanctot |first1=Gustave |title=Canada and the American Revolution 1774–1783 |translator-last=Cameron|translator-first= Margaret M|publisher=Harvard University Press |year=1967|oclc=70781264 |ref=lanctot}}
* {{Cite book |last=Landrum |first=John Belton O'Neall |url=https://archive.org/details/colonialandrevo00landgoog |title=Colonial and Revolutionary History of Upper South Carolina |publisher=Shannon |year=1897 |location=Greenville, SC |oclc=187392639 |ref=landrum1897 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Lanning |first=Michael |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1GEs53wMr7EC&pg=PA193 |title=American Revolution 100: The Battles, People, and Events of the American War for Independence, Ranked by Their Significance |publisher=Sourcebooks |year=2009 |isbn=978-1402241703 |pages=195–196 |ref=lanning2009 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Lanning |first=Michael |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=EQ-uPQAACAAJ |title=Defenders Of Liberty: African Americans in the Revolutionary War |publisher=Citadel Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-1559725132 |ref=lanning2012 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Lass |first=William |title=Minnesota's Boundary with Canada: Its Evolution Since 1783|publisher=Minnesota Historical Society Press |year=1980 |isbn=978-0873511537}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lecky |first=William Edward Hartpole |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofengland03leck/page/n6/mode/2up |title=A History of England in the Eighteenth Century |publisher=London: Longmans, Green |year=1892 |volume=3 |ref=lecky3 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Lecky |first=William Edward Hartpole |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=m3cUAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA70 |title=A History of England |year=1891 |volume=4 |pages=70–78 |ref=lecky4 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Lefkowitz |first=Arthur S. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tCcRAQAAMAAJ |title=Benedict Arnold's Army: The 1775 American Invasion of Canada during the Revolutionary War |publisher=Savas Beatie |year=2007 |isbn=978-1932714036 |ref=lefkowitz2007 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Lengel |first=Edward |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yHTGAAAACAAJ |title=General George Washington |publisher=Random House Paperbacks |year=2005 |isbn=978-0812969504 |location=New York |ref=lengel2005 |author-link=Edward G. Lengel }}
* {{Cite book |last=Lockhart |first=Paul Douglas |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Iq8KX4VOgJEC |title=The Drillmaster at Valley Forge: The Baron de Steuben and the Making of the American Army |date=2010 |publisher=Harper Perennial |isbn=978-0061451645 |ref=lockhart }}
* {{Cite archive |author1=Louis XVI, his most Christian King |author2=Commissioners of the United States of America |item=Treaty of Alliance |date=6 February 1778|url=https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fr1788-2.asp |collection=18th Century |institution=Yale Law School Avalon Project |ref=louisXVI1778b |quote=Thirteen articles}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lowell |first=Edward Jackson |url=https://archive.org/details/hessiansotherger00lowe/page/n4/mode/2up |title=The Hessians and the other German auxiliaries of Great Britain in the revolutionary war |publisher=Harper & Brothers. |year=1884 |location=New York |ref=lowell84 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Lowenthal |first=Larry |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=TPEQAQAAMAAJ |title=Hell on the East River: British Prison Ships in the American Revolution |publisher=Purple Mountain Press |year=2009 |isbn=978-0916346768 |ref=lowenthal2009 }}


<!-- M -->
=== Native Americans ===
* {{Cite book |last=Mackesy |first=Piers |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VKJ2AAAAMAAJ |title=The War for America: 1775–1783 |publisher=University of Nebraska Press |year=1993 |isbn=978-0803281929 |ref=mackesy93 |orig-year=1964 }}–&nbsp;Highly regarded examination of British strategy and leadership. An introduction by John W. Shy with his biographical sketch of Mackesy.
Most ] east of the ] were affected by the war, and many communities were divided over the question of how to respond to the conflict. Though a few tribes were on friendly terms with the Americans, most Native Americans opposed the United States as a potential threat to their territory. Approximately 13,000 Native Americans fought on the British side, with the largest group coming from the ] tribes, who fielded around 1,500 men.<ref>Greene and Pole (1999), p.&nbsp;393; Boatner (1974), p.&nbsp;545.</ref> The powerful ] was shattered as a result of the conflict; although the Confederacy did not take sides, the ], ], and ] nations sided with the British. Members of the ] fought on both sides. Many ] and ] sided with the colonists. The Continental Army sent the ] on raids throughout New York to cripple the Iroquois tribes that had sided with the British. Both during and after the war friction between the Mohawk leaders ] and ], who had sided with the Americans and the British respectively, further exacerbated the split.
* {{Cite book |last=Mahan |first=Alfred Thayer |url=https://archive.org/details/seanpowerinf00maha/page/n6/mode/2up |title=The influence of sea power upon history, 1660–1783 |publisher=Boston : Little, Brown and Company |year=1890 |ref=mahan1890 |author-link=Alfred Thayer Mahan }}
]
* {{Cite book |last=Mahan |first=Alfred T. |url=https://archive.org/details/majoroperationso00maha |title=Major Operations of the Royal Navy, 1762–1783: Being Chapter XXXI in The Royal Navy. A History |publisher=Little, Brown |year=1898 |location=Boston |oclc=46778589 |ref=mahan1898 |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Mahan |first=Alfred Thayer |url=https://archive.org/details/majoroperationso1913maha |title=The Major Operations of the Navies in the War of American Independence |publisher=Courier Dover Publications |year=2020 |isbn=978-0486842103 |ref=mahan2020 |author-mask=2 |orig-year=1913 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Maier |first=Pauline |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yvsCEY5oI8sC |title=American scripture: making the Declaration of Independence |publisher=Vintage Books |year=1998 |isbn=978-0679779087 |ref=maier1998 |author-link=Pauline Maier }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Mauch |first=Christof |date=Winter 1998 |title=Images of America—Political Myths—Historiography: "Hessians" in the War of Independence |journal=Amerikastudien / American Studies |publisher=Universitätsverlag WINTER Gmbh |volume=48 |issue=3 |pages=411–423 |jstor=41157873 |ref=mauch2003}}
* {{Cite book |last=Mays |first=Terry M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=e35_DwAAQBAJ |title=Historical Dictionary of the American Revolution |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield |year=2016 |isbn=978-1538119723 |ref=mays2019 }}
* {{Cite book |last=McCrady |first=Edward |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofsouthca00mccr |title=The history of South Carolina in the Revolution, 1775–1780 |publisher=New York, The Macmillan Company; London, Macmillan & Co., ltd. |year=1901 |ref=mccrady1775 }}
* {{Cite book |last=McCullough |first=David |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=uu1mC6zWNTwC |title=1776 |publisher=New York: Simon & Schuster |year=2005 |isbn=978-0743287708 |ref=mccullough2005 |author-link=David McCullough }}
* {{Cite book |last=McGeorge |first=Wallace |url=https://archive.org/details/battleofredbankr00mcge |title=The battle of Red Bank, resulting in the defeat of the Hessians and the destruction of the British frigate Augusta, Oct. 22 and 23, 1777 |publisher=Camden, New Jersey, Sinnickson Chew, printers |year=1905 |ref=mcgeorge1905 }}
* {{Cite book |last=McGuire |first=Thomas J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OsNi7Byog6kC&pg=PA166 |title=Stop the Revolution: America in the Summer of Independence and the Conference for Peace |publisher=Stackpole Books |year=2011 |isbn=978-0811745086 |ref=mcguire2011 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Middlekauff |first=Robert |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nya0ODz-B-cC |title=The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789 |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2007 |isbn=978-0199740925 |ref=middlekauff1982 |author-link=Robert Middlekauff |orig-year=1982 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Middleton |first=Richard |date=2014 |title=Naval Resources and the British Defeat at Yorktown, 1781 |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00253359.2014.866373 |journal=The Mariner's Mirror |volume=100 |issue=1 |pages=29–43 |doi=10.1080/00253359.2014.866373 |ref=middleton2014 |s2cid=154569534 }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=huu6xgEACAAJ |title=Treaties and Other International Acts of the United States of America: 1776–1818 &nbsp;<small>(Documents 1–40)</small> |publisher=U.S. Government Printing Office |year=1931 |editor-last=Miller, Hunter |volume=II |ref=miller1931 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Miller |first=John C. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=DlmrAAAAIAAJ&pg=PA410 |title=Origins of the American Revolution |publisher=Stanford UP |year=1959 |isbn=978-0804705936 |ref=miller1959 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Mitchell |first=Barbara A. |date=Autumn 2012 |title=America's Spanish Savior: Bernardo de Gálvez |url=http://www.historynet.com/americas-spanish-savior-bernardo-de-galvez.htm |journal=MHQ (Military History Quarterly) |pages=98–104 |ref=mitchell2012 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Montero |first=Francisco Maria |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=bHRmkdBONd0C |title=Historia de Gibraltar y de su campo |publisher=Imprenta de la Revista Médica |year=1860 |page=356 |language=es |ref=montero }}
* {{Cite book |last=Morgan |first=Edmund S. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=QC1dtQAACAAJ |title=The Birth of the Republic: 1763–1789 |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-0226923420 |edition=4th |quote=foreword by Joseph Ellis |ref=morgan2012 |orig-year=1956 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Morley |first=Vincent |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iBrJz9XYzNgC&pg=PA154 |title=Irish Opinion and the American Revolution, 1760–1783 |publisher=Cambridge UP |year=2002 |isbn=978-1139434560 |ref=morley2002 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Morrill |first=Dan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RXh2AAAAMAAJ |title=Southern Campaigns of the American Revolution |publisher=Nautical & Aviation Publishing |year=1993 |isbn=978-1877853210 |ref=morrill }}
* {{Cite book |last=Morris |first=Richard B. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_sXbxwEACAAJ |title=The Peacemakers: The Great Powers and American Independence |year=1983 |isbn=978-1299106598 |ref=morris1965 |orig-year=1965 }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=CUV2AAAAMAAJ |title=Encyclopedia of American History |publisher=Harper & Row |year=1982 |isbn=978-0061816055 |editor-last=Morris |editor-first=Richard B. |edition=6th |quote=with Henry Steele Commager as chief consulting editor |ref=Morris1982 |editor2-last=Morris |editor2-first=Jeffrey B. }}
* {{Cite book |last=Morrissey |first=Brendan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eR9WvgAACAAJ |title=Yorktown 1781: The World Turned Upside Down |publisher=Bloomsbury |year=1997 |isbn=978-1855326880 |ref=morrissey1997 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Mulhall |first=Michael G. |url=https://archive.org/details/newdictionaryofs00webb |title=Mulhall's Dictionary of Statistics |publisher=George Boutleddge and Sons, London |year=1884 |ref=mulhall |orig-year=1884 }}


<!-- N -->
Early in July 1776, a major action in the fledgling conflict occurred when the ] allies of Britain attacked the ] of ]. Their defeat resulted in a splintering of the Cherokee towns and people, and was directly responsible for the rise of the ], bitter enemies of the Colonials who carried on a ] for decades following the end of hostilities with Britain.<ref name=finger1>John Finger, ''Tennessee Frontiers: Three Regions in Transition'' (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 2001), pp. 43–64.</ref>
* {{Cite book |last1=Namier |first1=Lewis |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Taw7DVGrbRcC&pg=RA1-PA246 |title=The House of Commons 1754–1790 |last2=Brooke |first2=John |publisher=Boydell & Brewer |year=1985 |isbn=978-04363-0420-0 |ref=namier1985 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Nash |first=Gary B. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=nOURDAAAQBAJ |title=Oxford Handbook of the American Revolution |date=2012 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-0199746705 |editor-last=Gray |editor-first=Edward G. |pages=250–270 |chapter=Chapter: The African Americans Revolution |quote=Oxford Handbooks |ref=nash2012 |editor2-last=Kamensky |editor2-first=Jane }}
* {{Cite book |last=Nash |first=Gary |title=The Unknown American Revolution: The Unruly Birth of Democracy and the Struggle to Create America |date=2005 |publisher=Viking Books |isbn=978-0670034208 |ref=nash2005}}
* {{Cite book |last=Nelson |first=Larry L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y1KekDaaKKAC |title=A Man of Distinction among Them: Alexander McKee and the Ohio Country Frontier, 1754–1799 |publisher=Kent, Ohio: Kent State University Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-0873387002 |ref=nelson1999 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Nester |first=William R. |title=The Frontier War for American Independence |publisher=Stackpole Books |year=2004 |isbn=978-0811700771 |ref=nester2004}}


<!-- O -->
] and ] allies of Britain fought against Americans in Georgia and South Carolina. In 1778, a force of 800 Creeks destroyed American settlements along the ] in Georgia. Creek warriors also joined ] raids into South Carolina and assisted Britain during the ].<ref name="Ward1999">{{cite book|last=Ward|first=Harry M.|title=The war for independence and the transformation of American society|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kgqa4_OBcIkC&pg=PA198|accessdate=March 25, 2011|year=1999|publisher=Psychology Press|isbn=978-1-85728-656-4|page=198}}</ref> Many Native Americans were involved in the fighting between Britain and Spain on the ] and up the Mississippi River—mostly on the British side. Thousands of Creeks, ]s, and ]s fought in or near major battles such as the ], the ], and the ].<ref name="O'Brien2008">{{cite book|last=O'Brien|first=Greg|title=Pre-removal Choctaw history: exploring new paths|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jGFmNPevedUC&pg=PA123|accessdate=March 25, 2011|date=April 30, 2008|publisher=University of Oklahoma Press|isbn=978-0-8061-3916-6|pages=123–126}}</ref>
* {{Cite book |last=O'Brien |first=Greg |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jGFmNPevedUC&pg=PA123 |title=Pre-removal Choctaw history: exploring new paths |year=2008 |publisher=University of Oklahoma Press |isbn=978-0806139166 |ref=o'brien2008 |access-date=March 25, 2011 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Olsen |first=Alison G |date=1992 |title=Eighteenth-Century Colonial Legislatures and Their Constituents |journal=The Journal of American History |volume=79 |issue=2 |pages=543–567 |doi=10.2307/2080046 |jstor=2080046 |ref=olsen1992}}
* {{Cite book |last=Otfinoski |first=Steven |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=RqAaRdNGCYIC |title=The New Republic |date=2008 |publisher=Marshall Cavendish |isbn=978-0761429388 |ref=otfinoski }}
* {{Cite journal |last=O'Shaughnessy |first=Andrew Jackson |date=Spring 2004 |title=If Others Will Not Be Active, I Must Drive": George III and the American Revolution |journal=Early American Studies |publisher=University of Pennsylvania Press |volume=2 |issue=1 |pages=1–46 |doi=10.1353/eam.2007.0037 |jstor=23546502 |ref=oshaughnessy2004 |s2cid=143613757}}
* {{Cite book |last=O'Shaughnessy |first=Andrew |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zFc-UCp6ZQsC |title=The Men Who Lost America |publisher=Yale University Press |year=2013 |isbn=978-0300191073 |ref=nessy |author-mask=2 }}
<!-- P -->
* {{Cite book |last=Paine |first=Thomas |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=8xNAMDp9NasC |title=Common Sense |publisher=Penguin Classics |year=1982 |isbn=978-0140390162 |editor-last=Kramnick, Isaac |ref=kramnick82 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Pancake |first=John |url=https://archive.org/details/thisdestructivew00panc |title=This Destructive War |publisher=University of Alabama Press |year=1985 |isbn=978-0817301910 |ref=pancake1985 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Palmer |first=Dave Richard |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=zANrP6rOOJkC |title=George Washington and Benedict Arnold: A Tale of Two Patriots |publisher=Simon and Schuster |year=2010 |isbn=978-1596981645 |ref=palmer2010 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Pares |first=Richard |url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001314334 |title=War and Trade in the West Indies, 1739–1763 |date=1963 |publisher=F. Cass Press |quote=online at Hathi Trust |ref=pares |orig-year=1936 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Paterson |first=Thomas G. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9-alDgRk-IYC&pg=PA13 |title=American Foreign Relations, Volume 1: A History to 1920 |publisher=Cengage Learning |year=2009 |isbn=978-0547225647 |pages=13–15 |ref=paterson2009 |display-authors=etal }}
* {{Cite book |last=Paullin |first=Charles |url=https://archive.org/details/navyamericanrev01paulgoog |title=The navy of the American Revolution: its administration, its policy and its achievements Oscar |publisher=The Burrows Brothers Co |year=1906 |quote=paullin massachusetts navy. |ref=paullin }}
* {{Cite thesis |last=Pearson |first=Jesse T |title=The Failure of British Strategy during the Southern Campaign of the American Revolutionary War, 1780–81 |publisher=Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a437052.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210228062141/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a437052.pdf |url-status=live |archive-date=February 28, 2021 |year=2005 |type=Thesis |ref=pearson2005 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Peckham |first=Howard Henry |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=khuuQgAACAAJ |title=The Toll of Independence: Engagements & Battle Casualties of the American Revolution |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=1974 |isbn=978-0226653181 |ref=peckham74 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Peterson |first=Merrill D. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=XcOXEb0O4-UC |title=Thomas Jefferson and the New Nation |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1975 |isbn=978-0195019094 |ref=peterson1975 |orig-year=1970 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Philbrick |first=Nathaniel |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wZ1iCgAAQBAJ |title=Valiant Ambition: George Washington, Benedict Arnold, and the Fate of the American Revolution |publisher=Penguin Books |year=2016 |isbn=978-0698153233 |ref=philbrick2016 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Piecuch |first=Jim |date=October 2004 |title=Massacre or Myth? Banastre Tarleton at the Waxhaws, May 29, 1780 |url=http://www.southerncampaign.org/newsletter/v1n2.pdf |archive-url=https://ghostarchive.org/archive/20221009/http://www.southerncampaign.org/newsletter/v1n2.pdf |archive-date=2022-10-09 |url-status=live |journal=Southern Campaigns of the American Revolution |volume=1 |issue=2 |ref=piecuch2004 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Pybus |first=Cassandra |year=2005 |title=Jefferson's Faulty Math: The Question of Slave Defections in the American Revolution |journal=The William and Mary Quarterly |volume=62 |issue=2 |pages=243–264 |doi=10.2307/3491601 |jstor=3491601 |ref=pybus2005}}


<!-- R -->
=== Race and class ===
* {{Cite book |last=Raab |first=James W. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=eCc8BQAAQBAJ&pg=PA135 |title=Spain, Britain and the American Revolution in Florida, 1763–1783 |year=2007 |isbn=978-0786432134 |page=135 |publisher=McFarland |ref=raab }}
Pybus (2005) estimates that about 20,000 slaves defected to or were captured by the British, of whom about 8,000 died from disease or wounds or were recaptured by the Patriots. The British took along some 12,000 at the end of the war; of these 8000 remained in slavery. Including those who left during the war, a total of about 8000 to 10,000 ex-slaves gained freedom.<ref>, ''William and Mary Quarterly'' 2005 62#2: 243–264.</ref> About 4000 freed slaves went to Nova Scotia along with about 1200 blacks who remained slaves.<ref>John N. Grant, "Black Immigrants into Nova Scotia, 1776–1815." ''Journal of Negro History'' (1973): 253–270. </ref><ref>James W. St G. Walker, ''The Black Loyalists: The Search for a Promised Land in Nova Scotia and Sierra Leone, 1783–1870'' (1992).</ref>
* {{Cite journal |last=Randall |first=Willard Sterne |date=Summer 1990 |title=Benedict Arnold at Quebec |url=http://www.aferguson.net/mhq/default.asp?year=1990&vol=2&issue=4 |journal=MHQ: The Quarterly Journal of Military History |volume=2 |issue=40 |pages=38–39 |access-date=March 31, 2020 |ref=randall'mhq |archive-date=September 23, 2020 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200923095400/http://www.aferguson.net/mhq/default.asp?year=1990&vol=2&issue=4 |url-status=dead }}
* {{Cite book |last=Rankin |first=Hugh F. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cJIqTB0B_7kC |title=Rebels and Redcoats: The American Revolution Through the Eyes of Those who Fought and Lived it |publisher=Da Capo Press |year=1987 |isbn=978-03068-03079 |ref=rankin }}
* {{Cite book |last=Rankin |first=Hugh F. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=GV_MCQAAQBAJ |title=The North Carolina Continentals |year=2011 |publisher=UNC Press Books |isbn=978-1258093402 |editor-last=Memory F. Blackwelder |ref=rankin |author-mask=2 |orig-year=1996 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Rappleye |first=Charles |url=https://archive.org/details/robertm_rap_2010_00_1148 |title=Robert Morris: Financier of the American Revolution |date=2010 |publisher=Simon & Schuster |isbn=978-1416570912 |ref=Rappleye2010 |url-access=registration }}
* {{Cite book |last=Reeve |first=John L. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=3k9_AgAAQBAJ |title=Strategy in the American War of Independence: A Global Approach |publisher=Routledge |year=2009 |isbn=978-1134210398 |editor-last=Hagan |editor-first=Kenneth J. |chapter=British Naval Strategy: War on a Global Scale |ref=reeve |editor2-last=McMaster |editor2-first=Michael T. |editor3-last=Stoker |editor3-first=Donald }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Reid |first=Darren R. |date=June 19, 2017 |title=Anti-Indian Radicalisation in the Early American West, 1774–1795 |url=https://allthingsliberty.com/2017/06/anti-indian-radicalisation-early-american-west-1774-1795 |journal=Journal of the American Revolution |ref=reidD2017 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Reid |first=John Phillip |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K4zyARfDVpUC |title=The Authority to Tax: Constitutional History of the American Revolution |date=1987 |publisher=University of Wisconsin Press |isbn=978-0299112905 |ref=reidJ1987 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Renaut |first=Francis P. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WZQFAQAAIAAJ |title=Le Pacte de famille et l'Amérique: La politique coloniale franco-espagnole de 1760 à 1792 |year=1922 |location=Paris |ref=renaut1922 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Reynolds |first=William R. Jr. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2dK4A8bpxEYC&q=Augusta |title=Andrew Pickens: South Carolina Patriot in the Revolutionary War |publisher=McFarland & Company, Inc. |year=2012 |isbn=978-0786466948 |location=Jefferson, NC |ref=reynolds2012 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Rignault |first1=Daniel P. |url=http://resource.nlm.nih.gov/101659674 |title=The History of the French Military Medical Corps |translator-last=DeBakey |translator-first=Michael E. |publisher=Ministère de la défense, Service de santé des armées |year=2004 |id=NLM 101659674 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Rinaldi |first=Richard A. |title=The British Army 1775–1783 |url=https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/30059083/the-british-army-1775-1783-richard-a-rinaldi-orders-of-battle |access-date=September 23, 2013 |publisher=Yumpu |ref=rinaldi |archive-date=August 17, 2021 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210817011751/https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/view/30059083/the-british-army-1775-1783-richard-a-rinaldi-orders-of-battle |url-status=dead }}
* {{Cite book |last=Risch |first=Erna |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sfpt2Wjzcw4C |title=Supplying Washington's Army |publisher=Center of Military History, United States Army |year=1981 |ref=risch1981 }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Ritcheson |first=Charles R. |year=1973 |title="Loyalist Influence" on British Policy Toward the United States After the American Revolution |journal=Eighteenth-Century Studies |publisher=Johns Hopkins University Press |volume=7 |issue=1 |pages=1–17 |doi=10.2307/3031609 |jstor=3031609 |ref=ritcheson}}
* Robinson Library {{Cite web |title=Battle of Monmouth Courthouse |url=http://www.robinsonlibrary.com/america/unitedstates/1775/campaigns/monmouth.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120213042627/http://www.robinsonlibrary.com/america/unitedstates/1775/campaigns/monmouth.htm |url-status=dead |archive-date=February 13, 2012 |access-date=June 20, 2017 |website=Robinson Library |publisher=Self-published |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Rose |first=Alexander |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=K4lUeuo-UI8C |title=Washington's Spies: The Story of America's First Spy Ring |publisher=Bantam Books |year=2014 |isbn=978-0553392593 |ref=alexrose |orig-year=2006 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Rose |first=Michael |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tUWSAAAAQBAJ |title=Washington's War: From Independence To Iraq |publisher=Orion Publishers |year=2013 |isbn=978-1780227108 |ref=rose2013 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Rossman |first=Vadim |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=A3djDQAAQBAJ |title=Capital Cities: Varieties and Patterns of Development and Relocation |publisher=Taylor & Francis |year=2016 |isbn=978-1317562856 |ref=rosssman2016 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Russell |first=David Lee |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5DFy0eWaPxIC&pg=PA72 |title=The American Revolution in the Southern colonies |publisher=McFarland |year=2000 |isbn=978-0786407835 |location=Jefferson, NC |oclc=248087936 |ref=russell }}


<!-- S -->
Baller (2006) examines family dynamics and mobilization for the Revolution in central Massachusetts. He reports that warfare and the farming culture were sometimes incompatible. Militiamen found that living and working on the family farm had not prepared them for wartime marches and the rigors of camp life. Rugged individualism conflicted with military discipline and regimentation. A man's birth order often influenced his military recruitment, as younger sons went to war and older sons took charge of the farm. A person's family responsibilities and the prevalent patriarchy could impede mobilization. Harvesting duties and family emergencies pulled men home regardless of the sergeant's orders. Some relatives might be Loyalists, creating internal strains. On the whole, historians conclude the Revolution's effect on patriarchy and inheritance patterns favored ].<ref>William Baller, "Farm Families and the American Revolution," ''Journal of Family History'' (2006) 31(1): 28–44. {{ISSN|0363-1990}}. Fulltext: online in ].</ref>
* {{Cite book |last1=Savas |first1=Theodore P. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KRRSfy7eVoIC |title=A Guide to the Battles of the American Revolution |last2=Dameron |first2=J. David |publisher=Savas Beatie LLC |year=2006 |isbn=978-1611210118 |ref=savas2006 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Scheer |first1=George F. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WC2vugAACAAJ |title=Rebels and Redcoats |last2=Rankin |first2=Hugh F. |publisher=New American library |year=1959 |asin=B000ZLZW9I |ref=scheer1959 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Schecter |first=Barnet |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=9LRhOpZid40C |title=The Battle for New York: The city at the heart of the American Revolution |publisher=Penguin Books |year=2003 |isbn=978-0142003336 |ref=schecter }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Schmidt |first=H. D. |date=1958 |title='The Hessian mercenaries: the career of a political cliche |journal=History |publisher=Wiley |volume=43 |issue=149 |pages=207–212 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-229X.1958.tb02208.x |jstor=24404012 |ref=schmidt1958}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Scott |first=Hamish M |date=1988 |title=Sir Joseph Yorke, Dutch Politics and the Origins of the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War |journal=The Historical Journal |volume=31 |issue=3 |pages=571–589 |doi=10.1017/S0018246X00023499 |jstor=2639757 |s2cid=154619712 |ref=scott1988}}
* {{Cite book |last=Scott |first=Hamish M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kndnAAAAMAAJ |title=British Foreign Policy in the Age of the American Revolution |publisher=Clarendon Press |year=1990 |isbn=978-0198201953 |ref=scott1990 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Showalter |first=Dennis |year=2007 |title=Hessians: The Best Armies Money Could Buy |url=https://www.historynet.com/hessians-the-best-armies-money-could-buy.htm |access-date=October 3, 2020 |publisher=Military History Magazine/HistoryNet |ref=showalter2007 }}
* {{Cite thesis |last=Schwamenfeld |first=Steven W. |title="The Foundation of British Strength": National Identity and the British Common Soldier |publisher=Florida State University |url=https://fsu.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fsu:176453/datastream/PDF/view |year=2007 |type=PHD |ref=schwamenfeld2007 }}
* {{cite book |last=Seineke |first=Kathrine Wagner |title=George Rogers Clark: Adventure in the Illinois and Selected Documents of the American Revolution at the Frontier Posts |publisher=Polyanthos |year=1981 |isbn=9992016531 |ref=seineke1981}}
* {{Cite book |last=Selby |first=John E. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WfCBYZs_jIMC |title=The Revolution in Virginia, 1775–1783 |publisher=Colonial Williamsburg |year=2007 |isbn=978-0879352332 |ref=selby2007 }}
* {{cite book|last=Simmons|first=Edwin Howard|author-link=Edwin H. Simmons|title=The United States Marines: A History|edition=4th|publisher=]|year=2003|location=]|isbn=1591147905|url-access=registration|url=https://archive.org/details/unitedstatesmari0000simm_r8b9|ref=simmons2003}}
* {{Cite book |last=Simms |first=Brendan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=izhwqC3W23UC |title=Three Victories and a Defeat: The Rise and Fall of the First British Empire, 1714–1783 |publisher=Penguin Books Limited |year=2009 |isbn=978-0140289848 |ref=simms }}
* {{Cite book |last=Skaggs |first=David Curtis |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1niaAAAAIAAJ |title=The Old Northwest in the American Revolution: An Anthology |publisher=State Historical Society of Wisconsin |year=1977 |isbn=978-0870201646 |ref=skaggs1977 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Smith |first=David |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IlMa-Krnxl8C&pg=PA21 |title=New York 1776: The Continentals' First Battle |publisher=Osprey Publishing |year=2012 |isbn=978-1782004431 |ref=smithD2012 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Smith |first=Justin Harvey |url=https://archive.org/details/bub_gb_Ls9BAAAAIAAJ |title=Our Struggle for the Fourteenth Colony: Canada and the American Revolution |publisher=G.P. Putnam's Sons |year=1907 |volume=1 |location=New York & London |ref=smithJ1907a }}
* {{Cite book |last=Smith |first=Justin Harvey |url=https://archive.org/details/ourstruggleforf03smitgoog |title=Our Struggle for the Fourteenth Colony: Canada and the American Revolution |publisher=G.P. Putnam's Sons |year=1907 |volume=1 |location=New York & London |ref=smithJ1907b |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Franklin |first1=Benjamin |url=https://archive.org/details/diplomaticcorres01sparuoft/page/n7/mode/2up/search/Portugal |title=The diplomatic correspondence of the American Revolution |last2=Lee |first2=Arthur |last3=Adams |first3=John |publisher=Boston: Hale, Gray & Bowen |year=1829 |editor-last=Sparks |editor-first=Jared |volume=1 |ref=sparks1829 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Stanley |first=George |url=https://archive.org/details/canadainvaded17700stan |title=Canada Invaded 1775–1776 |publisher=Hakkert |year=1973 |isbn=978-0888665782 |location=Toronto |oclc=4807930 |ref=stanley |url-access=registration }}
* {{Cite book |last=Stedman |first=Charles |url=https://archive.org/details/gri_33125010928733/page/n6/mode/2up |title=The history of the origin, progress, and termination of the American war |publisher=Dublin : Printed for Messrs. P. Wogan, P. Byrne, J. Moore, and W. Jones |year=1794 |volume=1 |ref=stedman1 }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://archive.org/details/dictionaryofnat02stepuoft/page/64/mode/2up?q=Aruthnot |title=Dictionary of National Biography |publisher=Macmillan |year=1885–1900 |editor-last=Stephen, Leslie |volume=2 |location=New York |ref=stephen1885 |editor2-last=Lee, Sidney }}
* {{Cite book |url=http://history.army.mil/books/AMH-V1/ch04.htm |title=American Military History Volume 1 The United States Army and the Forging of a Nation, 1775–1917 |publisher=Center of Military History, United States Army |year=2005 |isbn=0160723620 |editor-last=Stewart, Richard W. |volume=4 |location=Washington, D.C. |ref=stewartR }}
* {{Cite book |last=Stockley |first=Andrew |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=mHoaiPKTKvwC |title=Britain and France at the Birth of America: The European Powers and the Peace Negotiations of 1782–1783 |publisher=University of Exeter Press |year=2001 |isbn=978-0859896153 |ref=stockley2001 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Stone |first=Bailey |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UAZAhYVJwlUC |title=The Genesis of the French Revolution: A Global Historical Interpretation |year=1994 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-0521445702 |ref=stone1994 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Syrett |first=David |url=https://archive.org/details/royalnavyineurop00syre |title=The Royal Navy in European Waters During the American Revolutionary War |publisher=Univ of South Carolina Press |year=1998 |isbn=978-1570032387 |ref=syrett1998 |url-access=registration }}
* {{cite book |last=Stryker |first=William Scudder |title=The Battles of Trenton and Princeton |volume= |author-link= |publisher=Boston : Houghton, Mifflin and Company |year=1898 |url=https://archive.org/details/battlesoftrenton00stry/page/n9/mode/2up |ref=stryker1898 }}
<!-- T -->
* {{Cite book |last=Taafe |first=Stephen R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=LlN2AAAAMAAJ |title=The Philadelphia Campaign, 1777–1778 |date=2003 |publisher=University Press of Kansas |isbn=978-0700612673 |ref=taffe }}
* {{Cite book |last=Taylor |first=Alan |title=] |publisher=WW Norton & Company |year=2016 |isbn=978-0393253870 |ref=taylor2016 |author-link=Alan Taylor (historian) }}
* {{Cite book |last=Tellier |first=L.-N. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=cXuCjDbxC1YC |title=Urban World History: an Economic and Geographical Perspective |publisher=Quebec: PUQ |year=2009 |isbn=978-2760522091 |ref=tellier2009 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Thomas |first=Molly |date=November 9, 2017 |title=The Last Naval Battle of the American Revolution |url=https://myfloridahistory.org/frontiers/article/184 |access-date=October 2, 2020 |publisher=Florida Frontiers Article, The Florida Historical Society |ref=thomas2017 }}
* {{Cite web |last=Tolson |first=Jay |date=27 June 2008 |title=How George Washington's Savvy Won the Day:Despite his share of errors, the commander in chief prevailed as a strategist and a politician |url=https://www.usnews.com/news/national/articles/2008/06/27/how-george-washingtons-savvy-won-the-day?context=amp |access-date=29 September 2020 |ref=tolson }}
* {{Cite book |last=Trevelyan |first=George Otto |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=hvd.hw20mv&view=1up&seq=7 |title=George the Third and Charles Fox: the concluding part of The American revolution |date=1912 |publisher=Longmans, Green, and Company |quote=Archived online at HathiTrust.org |ref=trevelyan1912a |author-link=Sir George Trevelyan, 2nd Baronet }}
* {{Cite book |last=Trevelyan |first=George Otto |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_ggRIvlX3hAC |title=History of the American Revolution |date=1912 |publisher=Longmans, Green & Co. |volume=IV |ref=trevelyan1912b |author-mask=2 |author-link=Sir George Trevelyan, 2nd Baronet }}
* {{Cite book |last=Tucker |first=Mary |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=IZUx6QnUxxQC&pg=PA22 |title=Washington Crossing the Delaware |date=March 1, 2002 |publisher=Lorenz Educational Press |isbn=978-0787785642 |pages=22–23 |ref=tucker2002 }}


<!-- U -->
McDonnell (2006) shows a grave complication in Virginia's mobilization of troops was the conflicting interests of distinct social classes, which tended to undercut a unified commitment to the Patriot cause. The Assembly balanced the competing demands of elite slave-owning planters, ] (some owning a few slaves), and landless indentured servants, among other groups. The Assembly used deferments, taxes, military service substitute, and conscription to resolve the tensions. Unresolved class conflict, however, made these laws less effective. There were violent protests, many cases of evasion, and large-scale desertion, so that Virginia's contributions came at embarrassingly low levels. With the British invasion of the state in 1781, Virginia was mired in class division as its native son, George Washington, made desperate appeals for troops.<ref>Michael A. McDonnell, "Class War: Class Struggles During the American Revolution in Virginia", ''William and Mary Quarterly'' 2006 63(2): 305–344. {{ISSN|0043-5597}} Fulltext: online at ].</ref>
* {{Cite web |last=U.S. Census Bureau |date=September 1975 |title=Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970; Colonial and Pre-Federal Statistics |url=https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1975/compendia/hist_stats_colonial-1970.html |quote=Bicentennial Edition |ref=uscb1975 }}
* {{Cite web |last=U.S. Central Intelligence Agency |date=5 December 2007 |title=An Overview of American Intelligence Until World War II |url=https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/2007-featured-story-archive/overview-of-american-intelligence.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20080311225710/https://www.cia.gov/news-information/featured-story-archive/2007-featured-story-archive/overview-of-american-intelligence.html |url-status=dead |archive-date=March 11, 2008 |website=US Central Intelligence Agency |quote=Featured Story Archive, Historical Document |ref=revamintel }}
* {{Cite archive |author1=U.S. Congress |author 2=Tribes Northwest of the Ohio River: Wyandots, Delawares, etc. |item=Treaty of Greenville 1795 |date=3 August 1795 |url=https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/greenvil.asp |collection=Document Collection: 18th Century, 1700–1799 |institution=Yale Law School Avalon Project |ref=USCon1795 |quote=Ten articles in the treaty, and fifteen tribal signatories for sixteen tribes.}}
* {{Cite archive |author=U.S. Military Academy History Department |item= Principal Campaigns of the War, 1775–1783 |item-url =https://www.westpoint.edu/sites/default/files/inline-images/academics/academic_departments/history/Am%20Rev/01ARPrincipalCampaigns.pdf |type =map |date = |series= Campaign Atlases of the United States Army |collection = The American Revolutionary War |collection-url= https://www.westpoint.edu/academics/academic-departments/history/atlases
|institution = United States Military Academy, History Department |location = West Point, New York |accession=20 October 2020 |ref=arwcampaigns}}


<!-- V -->
] at Yorktown, 1781]]
* {{Cite journal |last=Vale |first=Brian |date=22 March 2013 |title=The Conquest of Scurvy in the Royal Navy 1793–1800: A Challenge to Current Orthodoxy |url=https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00253359.2008.10657052 |journal=The Mariner's Mirror |volume=94, 2008 |issue=2 |pages=160–175 |doi=10.1080/00253359.2008.10657052 |ref=vale2013 |s2cid=162207993 }}


<!-- W -->
== See also ==
* {{Cite book |last=Walker |first=James W. St. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=BMY79c675JsC |title=The Black Loyalists: The Search for a Promised Land in Nova Scotia and Sierra Leone, 1783–1870 |year=1992 |publisher=University of Toronto Press |isbn=978-0802074027 |ref=walker1992 }}
{{portal|American Revolutionary War|United States Army}}
* {{Cite book |last=Wallace |first=Willard M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=y192AAAAMAAJ |title=Traitorous Hero: The Life and Fortunes of Benedict Arnold |publisher=Harper & Brothers |year=1954 |isbn=978-1199083234 |location=New York |ref=wallace54 |author-link=Willard M. Wallace }}
{{colbegin|2}}
* {{cite book |last1=Wallace |first1=Willard M. |last2=Ray |first2=Michael |author-mask=2 |date=21 September 2015 |title=American Revolution |url=https://www.britannica.com/event/American-Revolution |access-date=24 August 2020 |website=Britannica |publisher=Encyclopedia Britannica |quote=American Revolution, (1775–83), insurrection by which 13 of Great Britain's North American colonies won political independence and went on to form the United States of America. |ref=wallaceray2015 }}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last1=Ward |first1=A.W. |url=https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.107358/page/n503/mode/2up?q=Van+Tyne |title=Cambridge Modern History, vol.6 (18th Century) |last2=Prothero |first2=G.W. |publisher=University of Oxford, The University Press |year=1925 |quote=Digital Library of India Item 2015.107358 |ref=wardA1925 }}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Ward |first=Christopher |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ut5DCgAAQBAJ |title=The War of the Revolution (2 volumes) |publisher=New York: Macmillan |year=1952 |isbn=978-1616080808 |quote=History of land battles in North America |ref=ward1952 }}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Ward |first=Harry M. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=kgqa4_OBcIkC&pg=PA198 |title=The war for independence and the transformation of American society |publisher=Psychology Press |year=1999 |isbn=978-1857286564 |ref=wardH1999 }}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Washington |first=George |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=msu.31293023046711&view=1up&seq=190&q1=small%20pox |title=The Writings of George Washington: from the Original Manuscript Sources 1745–1799 |publisher=United States Government Printing Office |year=1932 |editor1-last=Fitzpatrick |editor1-first=John C. |volume=7 January 13, 1777 – April 30, 1777 |location=Washington, D.C. |quote=George Washington Bicentennial Edition in 35 volumes |ref=washington1932 }}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last1=Watson |first1=J. Steven |url=https://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=22810670 |title=The Reign of George III, 1760–1815 |last2=Clark |first2=Sir George |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1960 |isbn=978-0198217138 |ref=watsonclark |access-date=August 24, 2017 |archive-date=May 24, 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120524163653/http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=22810670 |url-status=dead }}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Weeks |first=William |title=The New Cambridge History of American Foreign Relations: Volume 1 |orig-year=2013 |publisher=Cambridge University Press |isbn=978-1107536227 |year=2015 |ref=weeks2013}}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Weigley |first=Russell F. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=77wNLMJn8CEC |title=The American Way of War |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=1977 |isbn=978-0253280299 |ref=weigley1977 }}
* ]
* {{Cite web |last=White |first=Matthew |year=2010 |title=Spanish casualties in The American Revolutionary war |url=http://necrometrics.com/wars18c.htm#AmRev |publisher=Necrometrics |ref=white2020 }}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Whiteley |first=Peter |title=Lord North: The Prime Minister Who Lost America |publisher=Hambledon Continuum |year=1996 |isbn=978-1852851453 |ref=whiteley1996}}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Wilson |first=David K |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=X2GrR0Eyh-4C |title=The Southern Strategy: Britain's Conquest of South Carolina and Georgia, 1775–1780 |publisher=University of South Carolina Press |year=2005 |isbn=978-1570035739 |location=Columbia, SC |oclc=232001108 |ref=wilson2005 }}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Winfield |first=Rif |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=VJCCAwAAQBAJ |title=British Warships in the Age of Sail: 1714–1792 |publisher=Seaforth Publishing |year=2007 |isbn=978-1844157006 |ref=winfield2007 }} (See also:])
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Wood |first=Gordon S. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=6lGinKwz7l8C |title='The Radicalism of the American Revolution |publisher=Alfred A. Knopf, New York |year=1992 |isbn=978-0307758965 |ref=wood1992 |author-link=Gordon S. Wood }}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Wood |first=Gordon S. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=xxgcDgAAQBAJ |title=Friends Divided: John Adams and Thomas Jefferson |publisher=Penguin Press, New York |year=2017 |isbn=978-0735224711 |ref=wood2017 }}
* ]
* {{Cite book |last=Wood |first=W. J. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ims9O7z2zc0C |title=Battles of the Revolutionary War, 1775–1781 |publisher=Da Capo Press |year=2003 |isbn=978-0306806179 |ref=wood1995 |orig-year=1995 }}
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
{{colend}}


<!-- Y -->
== Notes ==
* {{Cite web |last=Yaniz |first=Jose I. |date=2009 |title=The Role of Spain in the American Revolution: An Unavoidable Mistake |url=https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a519344.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200924021946/https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a519344.pdf |url-status=live |archive-date=September 24, 2020 |publisher=Marine Corps University |ref=yaniz }}
{{Reflist|group=N}}
<!-- Z -->


<!--Websites without authors-->
== References ==
* {{Cite web |last=Franklin |first=Bruce H |access-date=30 November 2015 |title=Which Side Benefitted the Most from the Native Americans |url=https://allthingsliberty.com/2015/11/which-side-benefited-the-most-from-the-native-americans/ |website=Journal of the American Revolution |date=November 30, 2015 |ref=jareditors2025 }}
<!-- To add a reference simply enclose the text you want to appear here inside a pair in the correct place in the body of the article.-->
* Canada's Digital Collections Program {{Cite web |title=The Philipsburg Proclamation |url=http://www.blackloyalist.com/canadiandigitalcollection/story/revolution/philipsburg.htm |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20071117055926/http://www.blackloyalist.com/canadiandigitalcollection/story/revolution/philipsburg.htm |archive-date=November 17, 2007 |access-date=1 November 2020 |website=Black Loyalists: Our History, Our People |publisher=Canada's Digital Collections Program |ref=blackcancol |place=Industry Canada }}
{{Reflist|30em}}
* History.org {{Cite web |last=Aron |first=Paul |year=2020 |orig-year=2005 |title=Women's Service with the Revolutionary Army : The Colonial Williamsburg Official History & Citizenship Site |url=http://www.history.org/history/teaching/enewsletter/volume7/nov08/women_revarmy.cfm |access-date=October 2, 2020 |publisher=The Colonial Williamsburg Foundation |ref=womens2009 }}

* Maryland State House {{Cite web |year=2007 |title="The Road to Peace, A Chronology: 1779–1784 |url=https://msa.maryland.gov/msa/mdstatehouse/html/road_peace.html |access-date=June 3, 2020 |publisher=William L. Clements Library / The Maryland State House |ref=clements2007 }}
== Further reading ==
* The History Place {{Cite web |title=An Unlikely Victory 1777–1783 |url=https://www.historyplace.com/unitedstates/revolution/revwar-77.htm |access-date=16 September 2020 |website=The History Place |quote=American Revolution timeline |ref=unlikelyvictory }}
<!-- works cited in the notes -->
* Totallyhistory.com {{Cite web |year=2012 |title=Red Coats |url=http://totallyhistory.com/red-coats/ |access-date=March 23, 2020 |publisher=Totallyhistory.com |ref=redcoats2012 }}
{{Refbegin|30em}}
* U.S. Merchant Marine {{Cite web |year=2012 |title=Privateers and Mariners in the Revolutionary War |url=http://www.usmm.org/revolution.html |access-date=May 25, 2017 |publisher=U.S. Merchant Marine |ref=usmm2012 }}
* ]. ''War for America: The Fight for Independence, 1775–1783''. 2001. Analysis from a noted British military historian.
* U.S. National Archives {{Cite web |year=1783 |title=Continental Congress: Remarks on the Provisional Peace Treaty |url=https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-03-02-0186#ARHN-01-03-02-0186-fn-0001 |access-date=July 15, 2020 |publisher=U.S. National Archives |ref=national }}
* Benn, Carl. ''Historic Fort York, 1793–1993''. Toronto: Dundurn Press Ltd. 1993. {{ISBN|0-920474-79-9}}.
* Valley Forge National Historic Park {{Cite web |date=12 August 2019 |orig-year=2007 |title=Overview of History and Significance of Valley Forge |url=https://www.nps.gov/vafo/learn/historyculture/valley-forge-history-and-significance.htm |website=Valley Forge National Historical Park, Pennsylvania |ref=vafo.nhp }}
* Boatner, Mark Mayo, III. ''Encyclopedia of the American Revolution.'' 1966; revised 1974. {{ISBN|0-8117-0578-1}}. Military topics, references many ]s.
* Yale Law School, Massachusetts Act {{Cite web |year=2008 |title=Great Britain : Parliament – The Massachusetts Government Act; May 20, 1774 |url=https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/mass_gov_act.asp |publisher=Yale Law School: The Avalon Project |ref=yale'mga }}
* Chambers, John Whiteclay II, ed. in chief. ''The Oxford Companion to American Military History''. ], 1999. {{ISBN|0-19-507198-0}}.
* Conway, Stephen. ''The British Isles and the War of American Independence'' (2002) {{doi|10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199254552.001.0001}} online
* {{Cite book|last=Crocker III|first=H. W.|title=Don't Tread on Me|publisher=Crown Forum|year=2006|location=New York|isbn=978-1-4000-5363-6}}
* Curtis, Edward E. ''The Organization of the British Army in the American Revolution'' (Yale U.P. 1926)
* Duffy, Christopher. ''The Military Experience in the Age of Reason, 1715–1789'' Routledge, 1987. {{ISBN|978-0-7102-1024-1}}.
* Edler, Friedrich. . University Press of the Pacific, 1911, reprinted 2001. {{ISBN|0-89875-269-8}}.
* Ellis, Joseph J. ''His Excellency: George Washington''. (2004). {{ISBN|1-4000-4031-0}}.
* ]. '']''. New York: Oxford University Press, 2004. {{ISBN|0-19-517034-2}}.
* Fletcher, Charles Robert Leslie. . E.P. Dutton, 1909. {{OCLC|12063427}}.
* Greene, Jack P. and Pole, J.R., eds. ''The Blackwell Encyclopedia of the American Revolution''. Malden, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 1991; reprint 1999. {{ISBN|1-55786-547-7}}. Collection of essays focused on political and social history.
* Gilbert, Alan. ''Black Patriots and Loyalists: Fighting for Emancipation in the War for Independence''. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012. {{ISBN|978-0-226-29307-3}}.
* ]. ''The War of American Independence: Military Attitudes, Policies, and Practice, 1763–1789''. Northeastern University Press, 1983. {{ISBN|0-930350-44-8}}. Overview of military topics; online in ACLS History E-book Project.
* Morrissey, Brendan. ''Monmouth Courthouse 1778: The Last Great Battle in the North''. Osprey Publishing, 2004. {{ISBN|1-84176-772-7}}.
* Jensen, Merrill. ''The Founding of a Nation: A History of the American Revolution 1763–1776.'' (2004)
* Kaplan, Sidney and Emma Nogrady Kaplan. ''The Black Presence in the Era of the American Revolution''. Amherst, Massachusetts: The ], 1989. {{ISBN|0-87023-663-6}}.
* Ketchum, Richard M. ''Saratoga: Turning Point of America's Revolutionary War''. Henry Holt, 1997. {{ISBN|0-8050-4681-X}}.
* ]. . London, 1964. Reprinted ], 1993. {{ISBN|0-8032-8192-7}}. Highly regarded examination of British strategy and leadership.
* ]. '']''. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2005.
* Middleton, Richard, ''The War of American Independence, 1775–1783''. London: Pearson, 2012. {{ISBN|978-0-582-22942-6}}
* {{cite book | last=Reynolds, Jr. | first=William R. | title=Andrew Pickens: South Carolina Patriot in the Revolutionary War | publisher=McFarland & Company, Inc. | location=Jefferson NC | year=2012 | isbn=978-0-7864-6694-8}}
* Riddick, John F. ''The History of British India: a Chronology''. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2006. {{ISBN|978-0-313-32280-8}}.
* Savas, Theodore P. and Dameron, J. David. ''A Guide to the Battles of the American Revolution.'' New York: Savas Beatie LLC, 2006. {{ISBN|1-932714-12-X}}.
* ]. '']'', New York, NY: Ecco/HarperCollins, 2006
* O'Shaughnessy, Andrew Jackson. ''The Men who Lost America: British Leadership, the American Revolution, and the Fate of the Empire'' (Yale UP, 2014).
* Shy, John. ''A People Numerous and Armed: Reflections on the Military Struggle for American Independence''. New York: Oxford University Press, 1976 ({{ISBN|0-19-502013-8}}); revised University of Michigan Press, 1990 ({{ISBN|0-472-06431-2}}). Collection of essays.
* Stephenson, Orlando W. "The Supply of Gunpowder in 1776", ''American Historical Review'', Vol.&nbsp;30, No.&nbsp;2 (Jan. 1925), pp.&nbsp;271–281 in ].
* Tombs, Robert and Isabelle. ''That Sweet Enemy: The French and the British from the Sun King to the Present'' Random House, 2007. {{ISBN|978-1-4000-4024-7}}.
* Trevelyan, George Otto. ''George the Third and Charles Fox: the concluding part of The American revolution'' Longmans, Green, 1912.
* Watson, J. Steven. . 1960. Standard history of British politics.
* Weigley, Russell F. ''The American Way of War''. Indiana University Press, 1977. {{ISBN|978-0-253-28029-9}}.
* Weintraub, Stanley. ''Iron Tears: America's Battle for Freedom, Britain's Quagmire: 1775–1783''. New York: Free Press, 2005 (a division of Simon & Schuster). {{ISBN|0-7432-2687-9}}. An account of the British politics on the conduct of the war.
{{Refend}} {{Refend}}


==Further reading==
== Reference literature ==
<!-- Deny Citation Bot-->
<!-- books about the war in general that are not cited above -->
{{Main|Bibliography of the American Revolutionary War|Bibliography of George Washington}}
{{Refbegin|30em}} {{Refbegin|30em}}
* Allison, David, and Larrie D. Ferreiro, eds. ''The American Revolution: A World War'' (Smithsonian, 2018)
These are some of the standard works about the war in general that are not listed above; books about specific campaigns, battles, units, and individuals can be found in those articles.
* Bobrick, Benson. ''Angel in the Whirlwind: The Triumph of the American Revolution''. Penguin, 1998 (paperback reprint)
* Billias, George Athan. ''George Washington's Generals and Opponents: Their Exploits and Leadership'' (1994) scholarly studies of key generals on each side.\
* ] ''Our First Civil War: Patriots and Loyalists in the American Revolution''. New York: Anchor Books 2022. {{ISBN|978-0-593-08256-0}}
* Black, Jeremy. "Could the British Have Won the American War of Independence?." ''Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research.'' (Fall 1996), Vol. 74 Issue 299, pp 145–154.
* {{Cite book |last=British Army |url=https://catalog.hathitrust.org/Record/001658143 |title=Proceedings of a Board of general officers of the British army at New York, 1781 |series=New-York Historical Society. Collections. The John Watts de Peyster publication fund series, no. 49 |date=1916 |publisher=New York Historical Society |quote=The board of inquiry was convened by Sir Henry Clinton into Army accounts and expenditures |ref=none |orig-year=7 August 1781 }}
* Conway, Stephen. ''The War of American Independence 1775–1783''. Publisher: E. Arnold, 1995. {{ISBN|0-340-62520-1}}. 280 pages.
* {{Cite book |last=Burgoyne |first=John |url=https://archive.org/details/stateofexpeditio00burg |title=A state of the expedition from Canada : as laid before the House of commons |publisher=London : Printed for J. Almon |year=1780 |ref=none |author-link=John Burgoyne }}
* Lowell, Edward J. Williamstown, Massachusetts, Corner House Publishers, 1970, Reprint
* {{Cite journal |last=Butterfield |first=Lyman H. |date=June 1950 |title=Psychological Warfare in 1776: The Jefferson-Franklin Plan to Cause Hessian Desertions |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/3143556 |journal=Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society |publisher=American Philosophical Society |volume=94 |pages=233–241 |jstor=3143556 |ref=none |number=3 }}
* ]. ''History of the United States of America, from the discovery of the American continent.'' (1854–78), vol. 7–10.
* {{Cite book |last=Cate |first=Alan C. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=l24SiYu1AjgC |title=Founding Fighters: The Battlefield Leaders Who Made American Independence |publisher=Greenwood Publishing Group |year=2006 |isbn=0275987078 |ref=name }}
* Bobrick, Benson. ''Angel in the Whirlwind: The Triumph of the American Revolution''. Penguin, 1998 (paperback reprint).
* {{Cite book |last=Caughey |first=John W. |title=Bernardo de Gálvez in Louisiana 1776–1783 |publisher=Pelican Publishing Company |year=1998 |isbn=978-1565545175 |location=Gretna |ref=none}}
* Fremont-Barnes, Gregory, and Ryerson, Richard A., eds. ''The Encyclopedia of the American Revolutionary War: A Political, Social, and Military History'' (ABC-CLIO, 2006) 5 volume paper and online editions; 1000 entries by 150 experts, covering all topics
* Chartrand, Rene. ''The French Army in the American War of Independence'' (1994). Short (48 pp), very well illustrated descriptions.
* Frey, Sylvia R. ''The British Soldier in America: A Social History of Military Life in the Revolutionary Period'' (University of Texas Press, 1981).
* {{Cite book |last1=Christie |first1=Ian R. |title=Empire or independence, 1760–1776 |last2=Labaree |first2=Benjamin W. |publisher=Phaidon Press |year=1976 |isbn=978-0714816142 |ref=none}}
* Hibbert, Christopher. ''].'' New York: Norton, 1990. {{ISBN|0-393-02895-X}}.
* {{Cite book |last=Clarfield |first=Gerard |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=t-OhkgEACAAJ |title=United States Diplomatic History: From Revolution to Empire |publisher=Prentice-Hall |year=1992 |isbn=978-0130292322 |location=New Jersey |ref=none }}
* Kwasny, Mark V. ''Washington's Partisan War, 1775–1783''. Kent, Ohio: 1996. {{ISBN|0-87338-546-2}}. Militia warfare.
* {{Cite book |last=Clode |first=Charles M. |url=https://archive.org/details/militaryforcesc00clodgoog/page/n7/mode/2up |title=The military forces of the crown; their administration and government |publisher=London, J. Murray |year=1869 |volume=2 |ref=none }}
* ]. ''The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763–1789''. Oxford University Press, 1984; revised 2005. {{ISBN|0-19-516247-1}}.
* ] and ], eds. ''The Spirit of 'Seventy-Six': The Story of the American Revolution as told by Participants''. (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1958).
* {{cite book|author1=Savas, Theodore|author2=J. David Dameron|title=Guide to the Battles of the American Revolution|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=KRRSfy7eVoIC&pg=PR37|year=2006|publisher=Savas Beatie}} Contains a detailed listing of American, French, British, German, and Loyalist regiments; indicates when they were raised, the main battles, and what happened to them. Also includes the main warships on both sides, And all the important battles.
* {{Cite journal |last=Davies |first=Wallace Evan |date=July 1939 |title=Privateering around Long Island during the Revolution |journal=New York History |publisher=Fenimore Art Museum |volume=20 |issue=3 |pages=283–294 |jstor=23134696 |ref=none}}
* Simms, Brendan. ''Three Victories and a Defeat: The Rise and Fall of the First British Empire, 1714–1783'' (2008) 802 pp., detailed coverage of diplomacy from London viewpoint
* {{Cite book |last=Downes |first=Randolph C. |url=https://www.amazon.com/Council-Fires-Upper-Ohio-Narrative/dp/B07GH35VCG |title=Council Fires on the Upper Ohio: A Narrative of Indian Affairs in the Upper Ohio Valley until 1795 |publisher=University of Pittsburgh Press |year=1940 |isbn=0822952017 |location=Pittsburgh |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Duncan |first=Francis |url=https://archive.org/details/historyofroyalre02duncuoft |title=History of the Royal Regiment of Artillery |publisher=London: John Murray |year=1879 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ferling |first=John E. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=lifQ0G0m9WwC&q=lafayette |title=Setting the World Ablaze: Washington, Adams, Jefferson, and the American Revolution |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2002 |isbn=978-0195134094 |ref=none |author-link=John E. Ferling |orig-year=2000 }}
* {{cite book|last=Fleming|first=Thomas|title=The Perils of Peace |location=New York|publisher=The Dial Press|year=1970|isbn=978-0061139116}}
* ], "Whose Revolution?: The history of the United States' founding from below" (review of ], ''Liberty Is Sweet: The Hidden History of the American Revolution'', Simon & Schuster, 2021, 800 pp.), '']'', vol. 314, no. 8 (18–25 April 2022), pp.&nbsp;32–37. Highlighted are the struggles and tragic fates of America's Indians and Black slaves. For example, "In 1779 Washington dispatched a contingent of soldiers to upstate New York to burn Indian towns and crops and seize hostages 'of every age and sex.' The following year, while serving as governor of Virginia, Jefferson ordered troops under the command of ] to enter the ] and bring about the expulsion or 'extermination' of local Indians." (pp.&nbsp;34–35.)
* {{Cite book |last=Fortescue |first=John |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1GlKAAAAYAAJ&q=Bednore%201783&pg=PA489 |title=A history of the British army |year=1902 |volume=3 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Fredriksen |first=John C. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2ZIdNNZVDzgC |title=Revolutionary War Almanac Almanacs of American wars Facts on File library of American history. |publisher=Infobase Publishing |year=2006 |isbn=978-0816074686 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Freedman |first=Russell |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Ia5ivgAACAAJ |title=Washington at Valley Forge |date=2008 |publisher=Holiday House |isbn=978-0823420698 |ref=none }}
* {{cite book|editor1-last=Fremont-Barnes|editor1-first=Gregory|editor2-last= Ryerson|editor2-first=Richard A|title=Encyclopedia of the American Revolutionary War: A Political, Social, and Military History|publisher=ABC-CLIO|year=2006|isbn=978-1851094080}}
* {{cite book|last=Frey|first=Sylvia R|title=The British Soldier in America: A Social History of Military Life in the Revolutionary Period|publisher=University of Texas Press|year=1982|isbn=978-0292780408}}
* {{Cite book |last=Gilbert |first=Alan |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-c7-udZhrvgC |title=Black Patriots and Loyalists: Fighting for Emancipation in the War for Independence |publisher=University of Chicago Press |year=2012 |isbn=978-0226101552 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Grant |first=John N. |year=1973 |title=Black Immigrants into Nova Scotia, 1776–1815 |journal=The Journal of Negro History |volume=58 |issue=3 |pages=253–270 |doi=10.2307/2716777 |jstor=2716777 |ref=none |s2cid=150064269}}
* {{Cite book |last=Jensen |first=Merrill |title=The Founding of a Nation: A History of the American Revolution 1763–1776 |publisher=Hackett Publishing |year=2004 |isbn=978-0872207059 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite book |last=Johnston |first=Henry Phelps |url=https://archive.org/details/yorktowncampaign00johnrich |title=The Yorktown Campaign and the Surrender of Cornwallis, 1781 |publisher=Harper & Bros |year=1881 |location=New York |page=34 |oclc=426009 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Hagist |first=Don N. |date=Winter 2011 |title=Unpublished Writings of Roger Lamb, Soldier of the American War of Independence |journal=Journal of the Society for Army Historical Research |publisher=Society for Army Historical Research |volume=89 |issue=360 |pages=280–290 |jstor=44232931 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Kaplan |first=Rodger |date=January 1990 |title=The Hidden War: British Intelligence Operations during the American Revolution |journal=The William and Mary Quarterly |publisher=Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture |volume=47 |issue=1 |pages=115–138 |doi=10.2307/2938043 |jstor=2938043 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite journal |last=Kepner |first=K. |date=February 1945 |title=A British View of the Siege of Charleston, 1776 |journal=The Journal of Southern History |publisher=Southern Historical Association |volume=11 |issue=1 |pages=93–103 |doi=10.2307/2197961 |jstor=2197961 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite book |last1=Kilmeade |first1=Brian. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=S-8QE2uCbScC |title=George Washington's Secret Six: The Spy Ring That Saved the American Revolution |last2=Yaeger |first2=Don |publisher=Penguin Books |year=2013 |isbn=978-0698137653 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Knight |first=Peter |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=qMIDrggs8TsC&pg=PA184 |title=Conspiracy Theories in American History: An Encyclopedia |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2003 |isbn=978-1576078129 |pages=184–185 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Kohn |first=George C. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OIzreCGlHxIC |title=Dictionary of Wars |edition=3rd |publisher=Infobase Publishing |year=2006 |isbn=978-1438129167 |ref=none }}
* Kwasny, Mark V. ''Washington's Partisan War, 1775–1783''. Kent, Ohio: 1996. {{ISBN|0873385462}}. Militia warfare.
* {{Cite book |last=Larabee |first=Leonard Woods |title=Conservatism in Early American History |date=1959 |publisher=Cornell University Press |isbn=978-0151547456 |quote=Great Seal Books |ref=none}}
* {{Cite book |last=Lemaître |first=Georges Édouard |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ZlxAFMQs4kYC&pg=PA229 |title=Beaumarchais |publisher=Kessinger Publishing |year=2005 |isbn=978-1417985364 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Levy |first=Andrew |url=https://archive.org/details/firstemancipator0000levy/page/74 |title=The First Emancipator: Slavery, Religion, and the Quiet Revolution of Robert Carter |publisher=Random House Trade Paperbacks |year=2007 |isbn=978-0375761041 |page= |ref=none }}
* Library of Congress {{Cite web |last=<!--Not stated--> |title=Revolutionary War: Groping Toward Peace, 1781–1783 |url=https://www.loc.gov/teachers/classroommaterials/presentationsandactivities/presentations/timeline/amrev/peace/ |access-date=24 August 2020 |website=Library of Congress |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Lloyd |first=Earnest Marsh |url=https://archive.org/details/reviewofhistoryo00lloyrich |title=A review of the history of infantry |publisher=New York: Longmans, Green, and Co. |year=1908 |ref=none }}
* May, Robin. ''The British Army in North America 1775–1783'' (1993). Short (48pp), very well illustrated descriptions.
* {{Cite web |last=McGrath |first=Nick |title=Battle of Guilford Courthouse |url=http://www.mountvernon.org/digital-encyclopedia/article/battle-of-guilford-courthouse/ |access-date=January 26, 2017 |website=George Washington's Mount Vernon: Digital Encyclopedia |publisher=Mount Vernon Ladies' Association |ref=none }}
* {{Cite journal |last=Middleton |first=Richard |date=July 2013 |title=The Clinton–Cornwallis Controversy and Responsibility for the British Surrender at Yorktown |url=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/1468-229X.12014 |journal=] |publisher=Wiley Publishers |volume=98 |issue=3 |pages=370–389 |doi=10.1111/1468-229X.12014 |jstor=24429518 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Middleton |first=Richard |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=s9MFBAAAQBAJ |title=The War of American Independence, 1775–1783 |publisher=London: Pearson |year=2014 |isbn=978-0582229426 |ref=none |author-mask=2 }}
* {{Cite book |last=Miller |first=Ken |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UKZFDwAAQBAJ&q=mercenaries |title=Dangerous Guests: Enemy Captives and Revolutionary Communities During the War for Independence |publisher=Cornell University Press |year=2014 |isbn=978-0801454943 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last1=Nash, Gary B. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=tyzmAJfLKs8C&pg=PA64 |title=Atlas Of American History |last2=Carter Smith |publisher=Infobase Publishing |year=2007 |isbn=978-1438130132 |page=64 |ref=none }}
* Neimeyer, Charles Patrick. ''America Goes to War: A Social History of the Continental Army'' (1995) {{JSTOR|j.ctt9qg7q2}}
* {{Cite book |last=Nicolas |first=Paul Harris |url=https://archive.org/details/historicalrecor00harrgoog/page/n167 |title=Historical record of the Royal Marine Forces, Volume 2 |publisher=Thomas and William Boone |year=1845 |location=London |quote=port praya suffren 1781. |ref=none }}
* {{Cite web |last=Ortiz |first=J.D. |title=General Bernardo Galvez in the American Revolution |url=http://www.thecajuns.com/galvezrw.htm |access-date=9 September 2020 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Perkins |first=James Breck |url=https://archive.org/details/franceinamerican00perk |title=France in the American Revolution |date=2009 |publisher=Cornell University Library |asin=B002HMBV52 |ref=none |orig-year=1911 }}
* {{Cite book |url=https://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=008/llsl008.db&recNum=21 |title=A Century of Lawmaking for a New Nation: U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774–1875: Treaty of Alliance with France 1778, "Article II". |publisher=Library of Congress archives |year=1846 |editor-last=Peters |editor-first=Richard |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ramsay |first=David |url=https://archive.org/details/universalhistor03ramsgoog/page/n4/mode/2up |title=Universal History Americanised: Or, An Historical View of the World, from the Earliest Records to the Year 1808 |publisher=Philadelphia : M. Carey & Son |year=1819 |volume=4 |ref=none |author-link=David Ramsay (historian) }}
* {{Cite book |last=Reich |first=Jerome R. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ALDbuNPu_IQC&q=Carlisle+Commission&pg=PA121 |title=British friends of the American Revolution |publisher=M.E. Sharpe |year=1997 |isbn=978-0765631435 |page=121 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Ridpath |first=John Clark |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Y8lKAAAAYAAJ |title=The new complete history of the United States of America |publisher=Jones Brothers |year=1915 |volume=6 |location=Cincinnati |oclc=2140537 |ref=none }}
* Royal Navy Museum {{Cite web |title=Ships Biscuits – Royal Navy hardtack |url=http://www.royalnavalmuseum.org/info_sheet_ship_biscuit.htm |url-status=dead |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20091031064002/http://www.royalnavalmuseum.org/info_sheet_ship_biscuit.htm |archive-date=October 31, 2009 |access-date=January 14, 2010 |publisher=Royal Navy Museum |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Sawyer |first=C.W. |url=https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=mdp.39015004848258&view=1up&seq=9 |title=Firearms in American History |publisher=C.W. Sawyer |year=1910 |location=Boston |quote=online at Hathi Trust |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Schiff |first=Stacy |author-link=Stacy Schiff |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=1vhpYe99Tn4C&pg=PT18 |title=A Great Improvisation: Franklin, France, and the Birth of America |publisher=Macmillan |year=2006 |isbn=978-1429907996 |page=5 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Scribner |first=Robert L. |title=Revolutionary Virginia, the Road to Independence |publisher=] |year=1988 |isbn=978-0813907482 |ref=none}}
* {{Cite book |last=Selig |first=Robert A. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ngEmGQAACAAJ |title=Rochambeau in Connecticut, Tracing His Journey: Historic and Architectural Survey |publisher=Connecticut Historical Commission |year=1999 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Smith |first=Merril D. |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=yqxmCgAAQBAJ&pg=PA374 |title=The World of the American Revolution: A Daily Life Encyclopedia |publisher=ABC-CLIO |year=2015 |isbn=978-1440830280 |page=374 |ref=none }}
* {{Cite book |last=Southey |first=Robert |url=https://archive.org/details/lifeoflordnelson00sout_0/page/n2/mode/2up |title=The life of Lord Nelson |publisher=Henry Chapman Publishers |year=1831 |isbn=978-0665213304 |ref=none }}
* Stoker, Donald, Kenneth J. Hagan, and Michael T. McMaster, eds. ''Strategy in the American War of Independence: a global approach'' (Routledge, 2009) .
* Symonds, Craig L. ''A Battlefield Atlas of the American Revolution'' (1989), newly drawn maps emphasizing the movement of military units * Symonds, Craig L. ''A Battlefield Atlas of the American Revolution'' (1989), newly drawn maps emphasizing the movement of military units
* {{Cite book |last=Trew |first=Peter |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=5XfxAAAAMAAJ |title=Rodney and the Breaking of the Line |publisher=Pen & Sword Military |year=2006 |isbn=978-1844151431 |ref=none }}
* Ward, Christopher. ''The War of the Revolution''. (2 volumes. New York: Macmillan, 1952.) History of land battles in North America.
* {{Cite web |last=Trickey |first=Erick |title=The Little-Remembered Ally Who Helped America Win the Revolution |url=https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/little-remembered-ally-who-helped-america-win-revolution-180961782/ |access-date=April 28, 2020 |publisher=Smithsonian Magazine January 13, 2017 |ref=none }}
* Wood, W. J. ''Battles of the Revolutionary War, 1775–1781''. {{ISBN|0-306-81329-7}} (2003 paperback reprint). Analysis of tactics of a dozen battles, with emphasis on American military leadership.
* {{Cite book |last=Turner |first=Frederick Jackson |url=https://archive.org/details/frontierinameric1920turn |title=The frontier in American history |publisher=New York: H. Holt and company |year=1920 |ref=turner1920 |author-link=Frederick Jackson Turner }}
* Men-at-Arms series: short (48pp), very well illustrated descriptions:
* {{Cite book |last=Volo |first=M. James |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=2gw8grU4NcoC |title=Blue Water Patriots: The American Revolution Afloat |publisher=Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc. |year=2006 |isbn=978-0742561205 |ref=none }}
** Zlatich, Marko; Copeland, Peter. ''General Washington's Army (1): 1775–78'' (1994)
* U.S. Army, ''American Military History'' Volume I, 2005.
** Zlatich, Marko. ''General Washington's Army (2): 1779–83'' (1994)
* U.S. National Park Service {{Cite web |date=April 25, 2013 |title=Springfield Armory |url=http://www.nps.gov/spar/historyculture/french-field_4pdr.htm |access-date=May 8, 2013 |publisher=Nps.gov |ref=none }}
** Chartrand, Rene. ''The French Army in the American War of Independence'' (1994)
* {{Cite book |last=Weir |first=William |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=WEXj4gHHARgC&pg=PA32 |title=The Encyclopedia of African American Military History |publisher=Prometheus Books |year=2004 |isbn=978-1615928316 |ref=none }}}
** May, Robin. ''The British Army in North America 1775–1783'' (1993)
* {{Cite web |last=Zeller-Frederick |first=Andrew A. |date=18 April 2018 |title=The Hessians Who Escaped Washington's Trap at Trenton |url=https://allthingsliberty.com/2018/04/the-hessians-who-escaped-washingtons-trap-at-trenton/ |website=Journal of the American Revolution |publisher=Bruce H. Franklin |quote=Citing William M. Dwyer and Edward J. Lowell, ''The Hessians: And the Other German Auxiliaries in the Revolutionary War'', 1970 |ref=none }}
* '']'', a treatise on light infantry tactics written by Colonel Andreas Emmerich in 1789.
* Zlatich, Marko; Copeland, Peter. ''General Washington's Army (1): 1775–78'' (1994). Short (48pp), very well illustrated descriptions.
* ——. ''General Washington's Army (2): 1779–83'' (1994). Short (48pp), very well illustrated descriptions.
{{Refend}} {{Refend}}


== External links == == External links ==
{{Commons category}}
{{Wiktionary|American Revolutionary War}} {{Wiktionary|American Revolutionary War}}
{{EB1911 poster|American War of Independence}}
{{Commons}}
{{Spoken Misplaced Pages|date=2022-10-16|En-American_Revolutionary_War-article.ogg}}
* from PBS
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230415155049/https://www.westpoint.edu/academics/academic-departments/history/american-revolution |date=April 15, 2023 }} at ]
*
*
*
* compiled by the ]

=== Bibliographies ===
*
* http://wayback.archive.org/web/20151101171424/http://www.history.army.mil/reference/revbib/revwar.htm compiled by the ]
* Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture

{{American Revolutionary War}} {{American Revolutionary War}}
{{Continental Army}} {{Continental Army}}
Line 718: Line 1,057:
{{US history}} {{US history}}
{{United States topics}} {{United States topics}}
{{Portal bar|United States|Great Britain}}
{{Authority control}} {{Authority control}}


] ]
] ]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
] ]
]
] ]
]
]
]

Latest revision as of 19:54, 4 January 2025

1775–1783 American war of independence from Great Britain This article is about military actions primarily. For origins and aftermath, see American Revolution.

American Revolutionary War
Part of the American Revolution
Clockwise from top left: Surrender of Lord Cornwallis after the siege of Yorktown, Battle of Trenton, The Death of General Warren at the Battle of Bunker Hill, Battle of Long Island, and the Battle of Guilford Court House
DateApril 19, 1775 – September 3, 1783
(8 years, 4 months and 15 days)
Ratification effective: May 12, 1784
LocationEastern North America, North Atlantic Ocean, the Caribbean
Result

American and allied victory

Territorial
changes

Great Britain cedes generally, all mainland territories east of the Mississippi River, south of the Great Lakes, and north of the Floridas to the United States.

Belligerents
Patriots:
 Thirteen Colonies (1775)
United Colonies (1775–1776)

 Great Britain

Combatants

  • Br. Canadien, Cong. rgts.
  • Br. Canadien mil., Fr. led
Native Americans
Combatants
Commanders and leaders


Strength
  • Great Britain:
    • Army:
      • 48,000 (average), most in North America
    • Navy:
      • Task-force fleets & blockading squadrons
  • Loyalist troops:
    • 25,000 (total)
  • German troops:
    • 29,875 (total)
  • Native Americans:
    • 13,000
Casualties and losses
  • United States:
    • 178,800–223,800 total dead
    • 6,800 killed
    • 6,100 wounded
    • 17,000 dead from disease
    • 25,000–70,000 war dead
    • 130,000 dead from smallpox
  • France:
    • 2,112 killed– East Coast
  • Spain:
    • 371 killed – W. Florida
    • 4,000 dead – prisoners
  • Native Americans: Unknown
  • Great Britain:
    • 8,500 killed
  • Germans:
    • 7,774 total dead
    • 1,800 killed
    • 4,888 deserted
  • Loyalists:
    • 7,000 total dead
    • 1,700 killed
    • 5,300 dead from disease
  • Native Americans
    • 500 total dead
American
Revolutionary War

Campaigns and theaters

The American Revolutionary War (April 19, 1775 – September 3, 1783), also known as the Revolutionary War or American War of Independence, was an armed conflict that was part of the broader American Revolution, in which American Patriot forces organized as the Continental Army and commanded by George Washington defeated the British Army. The conflict was fought in North America, the Caribbean, and the Atlantic Ocean. The war ended with the Treaty of Paris (1783), which resulted in Great Britain ultimately recognizing the independence of the United States of America.

After the British Empire gained dominance in North America with victory over the French in the Seven Years' War in 1763, tensions and disputes arose between Great Britain and the Thirteen Colonies over a variety of issues, including the Stamp and Townshend Acts. The resulting British military occupation led to the Boston Massacre in 1770. Among further tensions, the British Parliament imposed the Intolerable Acts in mid-1774. A British attempt to disarm the Americans and the resulting Battles of Lexington and Concord in April 1775 ignited the war. In June, the Second Continental Congress formalized Patriot militias into the Continental Army and appointed Washington its commander-in-chief. The British Parliament declared the colonies to be in a state of rebellion in August 1775. The stakes of the war were formalized with passage of the Lee Resolution by the Congress in Philadelphia on July 2, 1776, and the unanimous ratification of the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776.

After a successful siege, Washington's forces drove the British Army out of Boston in March 1776, and British commander in chief William Howe responded by launching the New York and New Jersey campaign. Howe captured New York City in November. Washington responded by clandestinely crossing the Delaware River and winning small but significant victories at Trenton and Princeton. In the summer of 1777, as Howe was poised to capture Philadelphia, the Continental Congress fled to Baltimore. In October 1777, a separate northern British force under the command of John Burgoyne was forced to surrender at Saratoga in an American victory that proved crucial in convincing France and Spain that an independent United States was a viable possibility. France signed a commercial agreement with the rebels, followed by a Treaty of Alliance in February 1778. In 1779, the Sullivan Expedition undertook a scorched earth campaign against the Iroquois who were largely allied with the British. Indian raids on the American frontier, however, continued to be a problem. Also, in 1779, Spain allied with France against Great Britain in the Treaty of Aranjuez, though Spain did not formally ally with the Americans.

Howe's replacement Henry Clinton intended to take the war against the Americans into the Southern Colonies. Despite some initial success, British General Cornwallis was besieged by a Franco-American force in Yorktown in September and October 1781. Cornwallis was forced to surrender in October. The British wars with France and Spain continued for another two years, but fighting largely ceased in North America. In the Treaty of Paris, ratified on September 3, 1783, Great Britain acknowledged the sovereignty and independence of the United States, bringing the American Revolutionary War to an end. The Treaties of Versailles resolved Great Britain's conflicts with France and Spain and forced Great Britain to cede Tobago, Senegal, and small territories in India to France, and Menorca, West Florida and East Florida to Spain.

Prelude to war

Main article: American Revolution Further information: American Enlightenment, Colonial history of the United States, and Thirteen Colonies
MAP of the 1763 Treaty of Paris claims in North America by the British and Spanish. The British claim east of the Mississippi River, including the Floridas ceded by Spain, and the previous French North America along the St. Lawrence River, west through the Great Lakes, and southerly along the east bank of the Mississippi River. Spanish claims added French cessions from French Louisiana east to the Mississippi River.
Map showing the territorial gains of Great Britain and Spain following the French and Indian War with lands held by the British prior to 1763 (in red), land gained by Britain in 1763 (in pink), and lands ceded to the Kingdom of Spain in secret during 1762 (in light yellow).

The French and Indian War, part of the wider global conflict known as the Seven Years' War, ended with the 1763 Peace of Paris, which expelled France from their possessions in New France. The Royal Proclamation of 1763 was designed to refocus colonial expansion north into Nova Scotia and south into Florida, with the Mississippi River as the dividing line between British and Spanish possessions in America. Settlement was tightly restricted beyond the 1763 limits, and claims west of this line, including by Virginia and Massachusetts, were rescinded. With the exception of Virginia and others deprived of rights to western lands, the colonial legislatures agreed on the boundaries but disagreed on where to set them. Many settlers resented the restrictions entirely, and enforcement required permanent garrisons along the frontier, which led to increasingly bitter disputes over who should pay for them.

Taxation and legislation

Further information: Boston Tea Party and Pine Tree Riot

The huge debt incurred by the Seven Years' War and demands from British taxpayers for cuts in government expenditure meant Parliament expected the colonies to fund their own defense. The 1763 to 1765 Grenville ministry instructed the Royal Navy to cease trading smuggled goods and enforce customs duties levied in American ports. The most important was the 1733 Molasses Act; routinely ignored before 1763, it had a significant economic impact since 85% of New England rum exports were manufactured from imported molasses. These measures were followed by the Sugar Act and Stamp Act, which imposed additional taxes on the colonies to pay for defending the western frontier. The taxes proved highly burdensome, particularly for the poorer classes, and quickly became a source of discontent. In July 1765, the Whigs formed the First Rockingham ministry, which repealed the Stamp Act and reduced tax on foreign molasses to help the New England economy, but re-asserted Parliamentary authority in the Declaratory Act.

However, this did little to end the discontent; in 1768, a riot started in Boston when the authorities seized the sloop Liberty on suspicion of smuggling. Tensions escalated in March 1770 when British troops fired on rock-throwing civilians, killing five in what became known as the Boston Massacre. The Massacre coincided with the partial repeal of the Townshend Acts by the Tory-based North Ministry. North insisted on retaining duty on tea to enshrine Parliament's right to tax the colonies; the amount was minor, but ignored the fact it was that very principle Americans found objectionable.

In April 1772, colonialists staged the first American tax revolt against British royal authority in Weare, New Hampshire, later referred to as the Pine Tree Riot. This would inspire the design of the Pine Tree Flag. Tensions escalated following the destruction of a customs vessel in the June 1772 Gaspee Affair, then came to a head in 1773. A banking crisis led to the near-collapse of the East India Company, which dominated the British economy; to support it, Parliament passed the Tea Act, giving it a trading monopoly in the Thirteen Colonies. Since most American tea was smuggled by the Dutch, the act was opposed by those who managed the illegal trade, while being seen as another attempt to impose the principle of taxation by Parliament. In December 1773, a group called the Sons of Liberty disguised as Mohawks dumped crates of tea into Boston Harbor, an event later known as the Boston Tea Party. The British Parliament responded by passing the so-called Intolerable Acts, aimed specifically at Massachusetts, although many colonists and members of the Whig opposition considered them a threat to liberty in general. This increased sympathy for the Patriot cause locally, in the British Parliament, and in the London press.

Break with the British Crown

Further information: Battles of Lexington and Concord and First Continental Congress

Throughout the 18th century, the elected lower houses in the colonial legislatures gradually wrested power from their governors. Dominated by smaller landowners and merchants, these assemblies now established ad-hoc provincial legislatures, effectively replacing royal control. With the exception of Georgia, twelve colonies sent representatives to the First Continental Congress to agree on a unified response to the crisis. Many of the delegates feared that a boycott would result in war and sent a Petition to the King calling for the repeal of the Intolerable Acts. After some debate, on September 17, 1774, Congress endorsed the Massachusetts Suffolk Resolves and on October 20 passed the Continental Association, which instituted economic sanctions and a boycott of goods against Britain.

While denying its authority over internal American affairs, a faction led by James Duane and future Loyalist Joseph Galloway insisted Congress recognize Parliament's right to regulate colonial trade. Expecting concessions by the North administration, Congress authorized the colonial legislatures to enforce the boycott; this succeeded in reducing British imports by 97% from 1774 to 1775. However, on February 9 Parliament declared Massachusetts to be in rebellion and instituted a blockade of the colony. In July, the Restraining Acts limited colonial trade with the British West Indies and Britain and barred New England ships from the Newfoundland cod fisheries. The tension led to a scramble for control of militia stores, which each assembly was legally obliged to maintain for defense. On April 19, a British attempt to secure the Concord arsenal culminated in the Battles of Lexington and Concord, which began the Revolutionary War.

Political reactions

Main article: Olive Branch Petition
The artist's recreation of the Declaration signing with portraits of the entire Second Congress, as though all members were present. The Committee of Five are standing centered together presenting a parchment on the table.
The Committee of Five, who were charged with drafting the Declaration of Independence, including (from left to right): John Adams (chair), Roger Sherman, Robert Livingston, Thomas Jefferson (the Declaration's principal author), and Benjamin Franklin

After the Patriot victory at Concord, moderates in Congress led by John Dickinson drafted the Olive Branch Petition, offering to accept royal authority in return for George III mediating in the dispute. However, since the petition was immediately followed by the Declaration of the Causes and Necessity of Taking Up Arms, Colonial Secretary Lord Dartmouth viewed the offer as insincere and refused to present the petition to the king. Although constitutionally correct, since the monarch could not oppose his own government, it disappointed those Americans who hoped he would mediate in the dispute, while the hostility of his language annoyed even Loyalist members of Congress. Combined with the Proclamation of Rebellion, issued on August 23 in response to the Battle at Bunker Hill, it ended hopes of a peaceful settlement.

Backed by the Whigs, Parliament initially rejected the imposition of coercive measures by 170 votes, fearing an aggressive policy would drive the Americans towards independence. However, by the end of 1774 the collapse of British authority meant both Lord North and George III were convinced war was inevitable. After Boston, Gage halted operations and awaited reinforcements; the Irish Parliament approved the recruitment of new regiments, while allowing Catholics to enlist for the first time. Britain also signed a series of treaties with German states to supply additional troops. Within a year, it had an army of over 32,000 men in America, the largest ever sent outside Europe at the time. The employment of German soldiers against people viewed as British citizens was opposed by many in Parliament and by the colonial assemblies; combined with the lack of activity by Gage, opposition to the use of foreign troops allowed the Patriots to take control of the legislatures.

Declaration of Independence

Main article: United States Declaration of Independence

Support for independence was boosted by Thomas Paine's pamphlet Common Sense, which was published on January 10, 1776, and argued for American self-government and was widely reprinted. To draft the Declaration of Independence, the Second Continental Congress appointed the Committee of Five: Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Roger Sherman, and Robert Livingston. The declaration was written almost exclusively by Jefferson.

Identifying inhabitants of the Thirteen Colonies as "one people", the declaration simultaneously dissolved political links with Britain, while including a long list of alleged violations of "English rights" committed by George III. This is also one of the first times that the colonies were referred to as "United States", rather than the more common United Colonies.

On July 2, Congress voted for independence and published the declaration on July 4. At this point, the revolution ceased to be an internal dispute over trade and tax policies and had evolved into a civil war, since each state represented in Congress was engaged in a struggle with Britain, but also split between American Patriots and American Loyalists. Patriots generally supported independence from Britain and a new national union in Congress, while Loyalists remained faithful to British rule. Estimates of numbers vary, one suggestion being the population as a whole was split evenly between committed Patriots, committed Loyalists, and those who were indifferent. Others calculate the split as 40% Patriot, 40% neutral, 20% Loyalist, but with considerable regional variations.

At the onset of the war, the Second Continental Congress realized defeating Britain required foreign alliances and intelligence-gathering. The Committee of Secret Correspondence was formed for "the sole purpose of corresponding with our friends in Great Britain and other parts of the world". From 1775 to 1776, the committee shared information and built alliances through secret correspondence, as well as employing secret agents in Europe to gather intelligence, conduct undercover operations, analyze foreign publications, and initiate Patriot propaganda campaigns. Paine served as secretary, while Benjamin Franklin and Silas Deane, sent to France to recruit military engineers, were instrumental in securing French aid in Paris.

War breaks out

Main articles: Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War and Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War See also: Western theater of the American Revolutionary War Further information: Naval battles of the American Revolutionary War


Early engagements

Further information: Battles of Lexington and Concord and Shot heard round the world
Snow-covered street fighting of British and Tory Provincials repulsing an American assault
The British repulse a Continental Army attack at the Battle of Quebec in December 1775
Continental Sergeant William Jasper of the 2nd South Carolina Regiment, on a parapet raising the fort's South Carolina Revolutionary flag with its white crescent moon.
Sergeant William Jasper of the 2nd South Carolina Regiment raises the fort's flag at the Battle of Sullivan's Island in Charleston, South Carolina, in June 1776

On April 14, 1775, Sir Thomas Gage, Commander-in-Chief, North America and Governor of Massachusetts, received orders to take action against the Patriots. He decided to destroy militia ordnance stored at Concord, Massachusetts, and capture John Hancock and Samuel Adams, who were considered the principal instigators of the rebellion. The operation was to begin around midnight on April 19, in the hope of completing it before the American Patriots could respond. However, Paul Revere learned of the plan and notified Captain Parker, commander of the Concord militia, who prepared to resist. The first action of the war, commonly referred to as the shot heard round the world, was a brief skirmish at Lexington, followed by the full-scale Battles of Lexington and Concord. British troops suffered around 300 casualties before withdrawing to Boston, which was then besieged by the militia.

In May 1775, 4,500 British reinforcements arrived under Generals William Howe, John Burgoyne, and Sir Henry Clinton. On June 17, they seized the Charlestown Peninsula at the Battle of Bunker Hill, a frontal assault in which they suffered over 1,000 casualties. Dismayed at the costly attack which had gained them little, Gage appealed to London for a larger army, but instead was replaced as commander by Howe.

On June 14, 1775, Congress took control of Patriot forces outside Boston, and Congressional leader John Adams nominated Washington as commander-in-chief of the newly formed Continental Army. On June 16, Hancock officially proclaimed him "General and Commander in Chief of the army of the United Colonies." He assumed command on July 3, preferring to fortify Dorchester Heights outside Boston rather than assaulting it. In early March 1776, Colonel Henry Knox arrived with heavy artillery acquired in the Capture of Fort Ticonderoga. Under cover of darkness, on March 5, Washington placed these on Dorchester Heights, from where they could fire on the town and British ships in Boston Harbor. Fearing another Bunker Hill, Howe evacuated the city on March 17 without further loss and sailed to Halifax, Nova Scotia, while Washington moved south to New York City.

Beginning in August 1775, American privateers raided towns in Nova Scotia, including Saint John, Charlottetown, and Yarmouth. In 1776, John Paul Jones and Jonathan Eddy attacked Canso and Fort Cumberland respectively. British officials in Quebec began negotiating with the Iroquois for their support, while US envoys urged them to remain neutral. Aware of Native American leanings toward the British and fearing an Anglo-Indian attack from Canada, Congress authorized a second invasion in April 1775. After the defeat at the Battle of Quebec on December 31, the Americans maintained a loose blockade of the city until they retreated on May 6, 1776. A second defeat at Trois-Rivières on June 8 ended operations in Quebec.

British pursuit was initially blocked by American naval vessels on Lake Champlain until victory at Valcour Island on October 11 forced the Americans to withdraw to Fort Ticonderoga, while in December an uprising in Nova Scotia sponsored by Massachusetts was defeated at Fort Cumberland. These failures impacted public support for the Patriot cause, and aggressive anti-Loyalist policies in the New England colonies alienated the Canadians.

In Virginia, Dunmore's Proclamation on November 7, 1775, promised freedom to any slaves who fled their Patriot masters and agreed to fight for the Crown. British forces were defeated at Great Bridge on December 9 and took refuge on British ships anchored near Norfolk. When the Third Virginia Convention refused to disband its militia or accept martial law, Lord Dunmore ordered the Burning of Norfolk on January 1, 1776.

The siege of Savage's Old Fields began on November 19 in South Carolina between Loyalist and Patriot militias, and the Loyalists were subsequently driven out of the colony in the Snow Campaign. Loyalists were recruited in North Carolina to reassert British rule in the South, but they were decisively defeated in the Battle of Moore's Creek Bridge. A British expedition sent to reconquer South Carolina launched an attack on Charleston in the Battle of Sullivan's Island on June 28, 1776, but it failed.

A shortage of gunpowder led Congress to authorize a naval expedition against the Bahamas to secure ordnance stored there. On March 3, 1776, an American squadron under the command of Esek Hopkins landed at the east end of Nassau and encountered minimal resistance at Fort Montagu. Hopkins' troops then marched on Fort Nassau. Hopkins had promised governor Montfort Browne and the civilian inhabitants that their lives and property would not be in any danger if they offered no resistance; they complied. Hopkins captured large stores of powder and other munitions that was so great he had to impress an extra ship in the harbor to transport the supplies back home, when he departed on March 17. A month later, after a brief skirmish with HMS Glasgow, they returned to New London, Connecticut, the base for American naval operations.

British New York counter-offensive

Main article: New York and New Jersey campaign Further information: Battle of Fort Washington and Battle of Long Island
Sailing ships on the Hudson River from afar, the scene emphases the two tall bluffs overlooking either side of the Hudson Narrows.
The British used the Narrows, connecting Upper and Lower New York Bay, to isolate Fort Washington in the Battle of Fort Washington in November 1776.

After regrouping at Halifax in Nova Scotia, Howe set sail for New York in June 1776 and began landing troops on Staten Island near the entrance to New York Harbor on July 2. The Americans rejected Howe's informal attempt to negotiate peace on July 30; Washington knew that an attack on the city was imminent and realized that he needed advance information to deal with disciplined British regular troops.

On August 12, 1776, Patriot Thomas Knowlton was ordered to form an elite group for reconnaissance and secret missions. Knowlton's Rangers, which included Nathan Hale, became the Army's first intelligence unit. When Washington was driven off Long Island, he soon realized that he would need to professionalize military intelligence. With aid from Benjamin Tallmadge, Washington launched the six-man Culper spy ring. The efforts of Washington and the Culper Spy Ring substantially increased the effective allocation and deployment of Continental regiments in the field. Throughout the war, Washington spent more than 10 percent of his total military funds on military intelligence.

Washington split the Continental Army into positions on Manhattan and across the East River in western Long Island. On August 27 at the Battle of Long Island, Howe outflanked Washington and forced him back to Brooklyn Heights, but he did not attempt to encircle Washington's forces. Through the night of August 28, Knox bombarded the British. Knowing they were up against overwhelming odds, Washington ordered the assembly of a war council on August 29; all agreed to retreat to Manhattan. Washington quickly had his troops assembled and ferried them across the East River to Manhattan on flat-bottomed freight boats without any losses in men or ordnance, leaving General Thomas Mifflin's regiments as a rearguard.

Howe met with a delegation from the Second Continental Congress at the September Staten Island Peace Conference, but it failed to conclude peace, largely because the British delegates only had the authority to offer pardons and could not recognize independence. On September 15, Howe seized control of New York City when the British landed at Kip's Bay and unsuccessfully engaged the Americans at the Battle of Harlem Heights the following day. On October 18, Howe failed to encircle the Americans at the Battle of Pell's Point, and the Americans withdrew. Howe declined to close with Washington's army on October 28 at the Battle of White Plains and instead attacked a hill that was of no strategic value.

Washington's retreat isolated his remaining forces and the British captured Fort Washington on November 16. The British victory there amounted to Washington's most disastrous defeat with the loss of 3,000 prisoners. The remaining American regiments on Long Island fell back four days later. General Henry Clinton wanted to pursue Washington's disorganized army, but he was first required to commit 6,000 troops to capture Newport, Rhode Island, to secure the Loyalist port. General Charles Cornwallis pursued Washington, but Howe ordered him to halt.

The outlook following the defeat at Fort Washington appeared bleak for the American cause. The reduced Continental Army had dwindled to fewer than 5,000 men and was reduced further when enlistments expired at the end of the year. Popular support wavered, and morale declined. On December 20, 1776, the Continental Congress abandoned the revolutionary capital of Philadelphia and moved to Baltimore, where it remained until February 27, 1777. Loyalist activity surged in the wake of the American defeat, especially in New York state.

In London, news of the victorious Long Island campaign was well received with festivities held in the capital. Public support reached a peak. Strategic deficiencies among Patriot forces were evident: Washington divided a numerically weaker army in the face of a stronger one, his inexperienced staff misread the military situation, and American troops fled in the face of enemy fire. The successes led to predictions that the British could win within a year. The British established winter quarters in the New York City area and anticipated renewed campaigning the following spring.

Patriot resurgence

Further information: George Washington's crossing of the Delaware River, Battle of Trenton, and Battle of Princeton
Washington standing up in a freight boat crossing a windy river filled with winter chunks of ice.
Washington Crossing the Delaware, an iconic 1851 Emanuel Leutze portrait depicting Washington's covert crossing of the Delaware River on December 25–26, 1776
James Monroe, the last U.S. president to fight in the Revolutionary War as a Continental Army officer, took part in the crossing of the Delaware River and the Battle of Trenton alongside George Washington

On the night of December 25–26, 1776, Washington crossed the Delaware River, leading a column of Continental Army troops from today's Bucks County, Pennsylvania, to today's Mercer County, New Jersey, in a logistically challenging and dangerous operation.

Meanwhile, the Hessians were involved in numerous clashes with small bands of Patriots and were often aroused by false alarms at night in the weeks before the actual Battle of Trenton. By Christmas they were tired, while a heavy snowstorm led their commander, Colonel Johann Rall, to assume no significant attack would occur. At daybreak on the 26th, the American Patriots surprised and overwhelmed Rall and his troops, who lost over 20 killed including Rall, while 900 prisoners, German cannons and supplies were captured.

The Battle of Trenton restored the American army's morale, reinvigorated the Patriot cause, and dispelled their fear of what they regarded as Hessian "mercenaries". A British attempt to retake Trenton was repulsed at Assunpink Creek on January 2; during the night, Washington outmaneuvered Cornwallis, then defeated his rearguard in the Battle of Princeton the following day. The two victories helped convince the French that the Americans were worthy military allies.

After his success at Princeton, Washington entered winter quarters at Morristown, New Jersey, where he remained until May and received Congressional direction to inoculate all Patriot troops against smallpox. With the exception of a minor skirmishing between the two armies which continued until March, Howe made no attempt to attack the Americans.

British northern strategy fails

Further information: Saratoga campaign, Philadelphia campaign, and Valley Forge
Saratoga campaign maneuvers and (inset) the Battles of Saratoga in September and October 1777

The 1776 campaign demonstrated that regaining New England would be a prolonged affair, which led to a change in British strategy to isolating the north by taking control of the Hudson River, allowing them to focus on the south where Loyalist support was believed to be substantial. In December 1776, Howe wrote to the Colonial Secretary Lord Germain, proposing a limited offensive against Philadelphia, while a second force moved down the Hudson from Canada. Burgoyne supplied several alternatives, all of which gave him responsibility for the offensive, with Howe remaining on the defensive. The option selected required him to lead the main force south from Montreal down the Hudson Valley, while a detachment under Barry St. Leger moved east from Lake Ontario. The two would meet at Albany, leaving Howe to decide whether to join them. Reasonable in principle, this did not account for the logistical difficulties involved and Burgoyne erroneously assumed Howe would remain on the defensive; Germain's failure to make this clear meant he opted to attack Philadelphia instead.

With a mixed force of British regulars, professional German soldiers and Canadian militia Burgoyne set out on June 14, 1777 and captured Fort Ticonderoga on July 5. As General Horatio Gates retreated, his troops blocked roads, destroyed bridges, dammed streams, and stripped the area of food. This slowed Burgoyne's progress and forced him to send out large foraging expeditions; one of more than 700 British troops were captured at the Battle of Bennington on August 16. St Leger moved east and besieged Fort Stanwix; despite defeating an American relief force at the Battle of Oriskany on August 6, Burgoyne was abandoned by his Indian allies and withdrew to Quebec on August 22. Now isolated and outnumbered by Gates, Burgoyne continued onto Albany rather than retreating to Fort Ticonderoga, reaching Saratoga on September 13. He asked Clinton for support while constructing defenses around the town.

Morale among his troops rapidly declined, and an unsuccessful attempt to break past Gates at the Battle of Freeman Farms on September 19 resulted in 600 British casualties. When Clinton advised he could not reach them, Burgoyne's subordinates advised retreat; a reconnaissance in force on October 7 was repulsed by Gates at the Battle of Bemis Heights, forcing them back into Saratoga with heavy losses. By October 11, all hope of British escape had vanished; persistent rain reduced the camp to a "squalid hell" and supplies were dangerously low. Burgoyne capitulated on October 17; around 6,222 soldiers, including German forces commanded by General Friedrich Adolf Riedesel, surrendered their arms before being taken to Boston, where they were to be transported to England.

After securing additional supplies, Howe made another attempt on Philadelphia by landing his troops in Chesapeake Bay on August 24. He now compounded failure to support Burgoyne by missing repeated opportunities to destroy his opponent: despite defeating Washington at the Battle of Brandywine on September 11, he then allowed him to withdraw in good order. After dispersing an American detachment at Paoli on September 20, Cornwallis occupied Philadelphia on September 26, with the main force of 9,000 under Howe based just to the north at Germantown. Washington attacked them on October 4, but was repulsed.

To prevent Howe's forces in Philadelphia being resupplied by sea, the Patriots erected Fort Mifflin and nearby Fort Mercer on the east and west banks of the Delaware respectively, and placed obstacles in the river south of the city. This was supported by a small flotilla of Continental Navy ships on the Delaware, supplemented by the Pennsylvania State Navy, commanded by John Hazelwood. An attempt by the Royal Navy to take the forts in the October 20 to 22 Battle of Red Bank failed; a second attack captured Fort Mifflin on November 16, while Fort Mercer was abandoned two days later when Cornwallis breached the walls. His supply lines secured, Howe tried to tempt Washington into giving battle, but after inconclusive skirmishing at the Battle of White Marsh from December 5 to 8, he withdrew to Philadelphia for the winter.

On December 19, the Americans followed suit and entered winter quarters at Valley Forge. As Washington's domestic opponents contrasted his lack of battlefield success with Gates' victory at Saratoga, foreign observers such as Frederick the Great were equally impressed with Washington's command at Germantown, which demonstrated resilience and determination. Over the winter, poor conditions, supply problems and low morale resulted in 2,000 deaths, with another 3,000 unfit for duty due to lack of shoes. However, Baron Friedrich Wilhelm von Steuben took the opportunity to introduce Prussian Army drill and infantry tactics to "model companies" in each Continental Army regiment, who then instructed their home units. Despite Valley Forge being only twenty miles away, Howe made no effort to attack their camp, an action some critics argue could have ended the war.

Foreign intervention

Main articles: France in the American Revolutionary War, Spain and the American Revolutionary War, and Carlisle Peace Commission
From the left, in the background three sailing warships at sea, one clearly flying a British naval ensign; in the center-right foreground, three sailing warships, two of them firing broadsides with gun smoke starting to cover them up. There was no US flag on the American ship, so the British said John Paul Jones was a pirate.
The Battle of Flamborough Head with U.S. warships in European waters with access to Dutch, French, and Spanish ports

Like his predecessors, French foreign minister Vergennes considered the 1763 Peace a national humiliation and viewed the war as an opportunity to weaken Britain. He initially avoided open conflict, but allowed American ships to take on cargoes in French ports, a technical violation of neutrality. Vergennes persuaded Louis XVI to secretly fund a government front company to purchase munitions for the Patriots, carried in neutral Dutch ships and imported through Sint Eustatius in the Caribbean.

Many Americans opposed a French alliance, fearing to "exchange one tyranny for another", but this changed after a series of military setbacks in early 1776. As France had nothing to gain from the colonies reconciling with Britain, Congress had three choices: making peace on British terms, continuing the struggle on their own, or proclaiming independence, guaranteed by France. Although the Declaration of Independence had wide public support, over 20% of Congressmen voted against an alliance with France. Congress agreed to the treaty with reluctance and as the war moved in their favor increasingly lost interest in it.

Silas Deane was sent to Paris to begin negotiations with Vergennes, whose key objectives were replacing Britain as the United States' primary commercial and military partner while securing the French West Indies from American expansion. These islands were extremely valuable; in 1772, the value of sugar and coffee produced by Saint-Domingue on its own exceeded that of all American exports combined. Talks progressed slowly until October 1777, when British defeat at Saratoga and their apparent willingness to negotiate peace convinced Vergennes only a permanent alliance could prevent the "disaster" of Anglo-American rapprochement. Assurances of formal French support allowed Congress to reject the Carlisle Peace Commission and insist on nothing short of complete independence.

On February 6, 1778, France and the United States signed the Treaty of Amity and Commerce regulating trade between the two countries, followed by a defensive military alliance against Britain, the Treaty of Alliance. In return for French guarantees of American independence, Congress undertook to defend their interests in the West Indies, while both sides agreed not to make a separate peace; conflict over these provisions would lead to the 1798 to 1800 Quasi-War. Charles III of Spain was invited to join on the same terms but refused, largely due to concerns over the impact of the Revolution on Spanish colonies in the Americas. Spain had complained on multiple occasions about encroachment by American settlers into Louisiana, a problem that could only get worse once the United States replaced Britain.

From the left, a coastal town set in the background of a harbor; in the foreground center-right in the approach to the harbor and curving into the right background, a line of French warships, one firing a broadside at the town.
French Admiral d'Estaing's joint expedition with Sullivan at the Battle of Rhode Island in August 1778

Although Spain ultimately made important contributions to American success, in the Treaty of Aranjuez, Charles agreed only to support France's war with Britain outside America, in return for help in recovering Gibraltar, Menorca and Spanish Florida. The terms were confidential since several conflicted with American aims; for example, the French claimed exclusive control of the Newfoundland cod fisheries, a non-negotiable for colonies like Massachusetts. One less well-known impact of this agreement was the abiding American distrust of 'foreign entanglements'; the U.S. would not sign another treaty with France until their NATO agreement of 1949. This was because the US had agreed not to make peace without France, while Aranjuez committed France to keep fighting until Spain recovered Gibraltar, effectively making it a condition of U.S. independence without the knowledge of Congress.

To encourage French participation in the struggle for independence, the U.S. representative in Paris, Silas Deane promised promotion and command positions to any French officer who joined the Continental Army. Such as Gilbert du Motier, Marquis de Lafayette, whom Congress via Dean appointed a major general, on July 31, 1777.

When the war started, Britain tried to borrow the Dutch-based Scots Brigade for service in America, but pro-Patriot sentiment led the States General to refuse. Although the Republic was no longer a major power, prior to 1774 they still dominated the European carrying trade, and Dutch merchants made large profits shipping French-supplied munitions to the Patriots. This ended when Britain declared war in December 1780, a conflict that proved disastrous to the Dutch economy.

The British government failed to take into account the strength of the American merchant marine and support from European countries, which allowed the colonies to import munitions and continue trading with relative impunity. While well aware of this, the North administration delayed placing the Royal Navy on a war footing for cost reasons; this prevented the institution of an effective blockade. Traditional British policy was to employ European land-based allies to divert the opposition; in 1778, they were diplomatically isolated and faced war on multiple fronts.

Meanwhile, George III had given up on subduing America while Britain had a European war to fight. He did not welcome war with France, but he held the British victories over France in the Seven Years' War as a reason to believe in ultimate victory over France. Britain subsequently changed its focus into the Caribbean theater, and diverted major military resources away from America.

Stalemate in the North

Main articles: Northern theater of the American Revolutionary War after Saratoga and Western theater of the American Revolutionary War
A close up of Continental infantry fighting in a street; a company on line firing to the left off the painting; in the center the officer; right foreground a drummer boy and behind him a soldier reloading a musket.
Continentals repulsing the British at the Battle of Springfield in June 1780; "Give 'em Watts, boys!"

At the end of 1777, Howe resigned and was replaced by Sir Henry Clinton on May 24, 1778; with French entry into the war, he was ordered to consolidate his forces in New York. On June 18, the British departed Philadelphia with the reinvigorated Americans in pursuit; the Battle of Monmouth on June 28 was inconclusive but boosted Patriot morale. That midnight, the newly installed Clinton continued his retreat to New York. A French naval force under Admiral Charles Henri Hector d'Estaing was sent to assist Washington; deciding New York was too formidable a target, in August they launched a combined attack on Newport, with General John Sullivan commanding land forces. The resulting Battle of Rhode Island was indecisive; badly damaged by a storm, the French withdrew to avoid risking their ships.

Further activity was limited to British raids on Chestnut Neck and Little Egg Harbor in October. In July 1779, the Americans captured British positions at Stony Point and Paulus Hook. Clinton unsuccessfully tried to tempt Washington into a decisive engagement by sending General William Tryon to raid Connecticut. In July, a large American naval operation, the Penobscot Expedition, attempted to retake Maine but was defeated. Persistent Iroquois raids in New York and Pennsylvania led to the punitive Sullivan Expedition from July to September 1779. Involving more than 4,000 patriot soldiers, the scorched earth campaign destroyed more than 40 Iroquois villages and 160,000 bushels (4,000 mts) of maize, leaving the Iroquois destitute and destroying the Iroquois confederacy as an independent power on the American frontier. However, 5,000 Iroquois fled to Canada, where, supplied and supported by the British, they continued their raids.

During the winter of 1779–1780, the Continental Army suffered greater hardships than at Valley Forge. Morale was poor, public support fell away, the Continental dollar was virtually worthless, the army was plagued with supply problems, desertion was common, and mutinies occurred in the Pennsylvania Line and New Jersey Line regiments over the conditions.

In June 1780, Clinton sent 6,000 men under Wilhelm von Knyphausen to retake New Jersey, but they were halted by local militia at the Battle of Connecticut Farms; although the Americans withdrew, Knyphausen felt he was not strong enough to engage Washington's main force and retreated. A second attempt two weeks later ended in a British defeat at the Battle of Springfield, effectively ending their ambitions in New Jersey. In July, Washington appointed Benedict Arnold commander of West Point; his attempt to betray the fort to the British failed due to incompetent planning, and the plot was revealed when his British contact John André was captured and executed. Arnold escaped to New York and switched sides, an action justified in a pamphlet addressed "To the Inhabitants of America"; the Patriots condemned his betrayal, while he found himself almost as unpopular with the British.

War in the South

Main article: Southern theater of the American Revolutionary War
A birds-eye view over the British lines of artillery besieging the port of Charleston in the center-background, and landing some shots at the docks.
The British siege of Charleston in May 1780
A close-up of a cavalry melee on large horses with sabers and pistols drawn; Three redcoats center-right are engaging two Patriots in blue along with an African-American in a brown linen shirt and white pants, with his pistol drawn and leveled at a redcoat.
The Continental Army routs the British Legion at the Battle of Cowpens in Cowpens, South Carolina, in January 1781

The Southern Strategy was developed by Lord Germain, based on input from London-based Loyalists, including Joseph Galloway. They argued that it made no sense to fight the Patriots in the north where they were strongest, while the New England economy was reliant on trade with Britain. On the other hand, duties on tobacco made the South far more profitable for Britain, while local support meant securing it required small numbers of regular troops. Victory would leave a truncated United States facing British possessions in the south, Canada to the north, and Ohio on their western border; with the Atlantic seaboard controlled by the Royal Navy, Congress would be forced to agree to terms. However, assumptions about the level of Loyalist support proved wildly optimistic.

Germain ordered Augustine Prévost, the British commander in East Florida, to advance into Georgia in December 1778. Lieutenant-Colonel Archibald Campbell, an experienced officer, captured Savannah on December 29, 1778. He recruited a Loyalist militia of nearly 1,100, many of whom allegedly joined only after Campbell threatened to confiscate their property. Poor motivation and training made them unreliable troops, as demonstrated in their defeat by Patriot militia at the Battle of Kettle Creek on February 14, 1779, although this was offset by British victory at Brier Creek on March 3.

In June 1779, Prévost launched an abortive assault on Charleston, before retreating to Savannah, an operation notorious for widespread looting by British troops that enraged both Loyalists and Patriots. In October, a joint French and American operation under d'Estaing and General Benjamin Lincoln failed to recapture Savannah. Prévost was replaced by Lord Cornwallis, who assumed responsibility for Germain's strategy; he soon realized estimates of Loyalist support were considerably over-stated, and he needed far more regular forces.

Reinforced by Clinton, Cornwallis's troops captured Charleston in May 1780, inflicting the most serious Patriot defeat of the war; over 5,000 prisoners were taken and the Continental Army in the south effectively destroyed. On May 29, Lieutenant-Colonel Banastre Tarleton's mainly Loyalist force routed a Continental Army force nearly three times its size under Colonel Abraham Buford at the Battle of Waxhaws. The battle is controversial for allegations of a massacre, which were later used as a recruiting tool by the Patriots.

Clinton returned to New York, leaving Cornwallis to oversee the south; despite their success, the two men left barely on speaking terms. The Southern strategy depended on local support, but this was undermined by a series of coercive measures. Previously, captured Patriots were sent home after swearing not to take up arms against the king; they were now required to fight their former comrades, while the confiscation of Patriot-owned plantations led formerly neutral "grandees" to side with them. Skirmishes at Williamson's Plantation, Cedar Springs, Rocky Mount, and Hanging Rock signaled widespread resistance to the new oaths throughout South Carolina.

In July 1780, Congress appointed Gates commander in the south; he was defeated at the Battle of Camden on August 16, leaving Cornwallis free to enter North Carolina. Despite battlefield success, the British could not control the countryside and Patriot attacks continued; before moving north, Cornwallis sent Loyalist militia under Major Patrick Ferguson to cover his left flank, leaving their forces too far apart to provide mutual support. In early October, Ferguson was defeated at the Battle of Kings Mountain, dispersing organized Loyalist resistance in the region. Despite this, Cornwallis continued into North Carolina hoping for Loyalist support, while Washington replaced Gates with General Nathanael Greene in December 1780.

Greene divided his army, leading his main force southeast pursued by Cornwallis; a detachment was sent southwest under Daniel Morgan, who defeated Tarleton's British Legion at Cowpens on January 17, 1781, nearly eliminating it as a fighting force. The Patriots now held the initiative in the south, with the exception of a raid on Richmond led by Benedict Arnold in January 1781. Greene led Cornwallis on a series of countermarches around North Carolina; by early March, the British were exhausted and short of supplies and Greene felt strong enough to fight the Battle of Guilford Court House on March 15. Although victorious, Cornwallis suffered heavy casualties and retreated to Wilmington, North Carolina, seeking supplies and reinforcements.

The Patriots now controlled most of the Carolinas and Georgia outside the coastal areas; after a minor reversal at the Battle of Hobkirk's Hill, they recaptured Fort Watson and Fort Motte on April 15. On June 6, Brigadier General Andrew Pickens captured Augusta, leaving the British in Georgia confined to Charleston and Savannah. The assumption Loyalists would do most of the fighting left the British short of troops and battlefield victories came at the cost of losses they could not replace. Despite halting Greene's advance at the Battle of Eutaw Springs on September 8, Cornwallis withdrew to Charleston with little to show for his campaign.

Western campaign

Main article: Western theater of the American Revolutionary War
At left center, Virginia militia Colonel George Rogers Clark with buckskinned uniformed militia lined up behind him; at right center, red-coated British Quebec Governor Hamilton surrendering with ranks of white-uniformed Tory militia behind receding into the background; a drummer boy in the foreground; a line of British Indian allies lined up on the right receding into the background.
Province of Quebec Governor Henry Hamilton surrenders to Colonel George Rogers Clark at Vincennes in July 1779

From the beginning of the war, Bernardo de Gálvez, the Governor of Spanish Louisiana, allowed the Americans to import supplies and munitions into New Orleans, then ship them to Pittsburgh. This provided an alternative transportation route for the Continental Army, bypassing the British blockade of the Atlantic Coast.

In February 1778, an expedition of militia to destroy British military supplies in settlements along the Cuyahoga River was halted by adverse weather. Later in the year, a second campaign was undertaken to seize the Illinois Country from the British. Virginia militia, Canadien settlers, and Indian allies commanded by Colonel George Rogers Clark captured Kaskaskia on July 4 and then secured Vincennes, though Vincennes was recaptured by Quebec Governor Henry Hamilton. In early 1779, the Virginians counter-attacked in the siege of Fort Vincennes and took Hamilton prisoner. Clark secured western British Quebec as the American Northwest Territory in the Treaty of Paris brought the Revolutionary War to an end.

When Spain joined France's war against Britain in the Anglo-French War in 1779, their treaty specifically excluded Spanish military action in North America. Later that year, however, Gálvez initiated offensive operations against British outposts. First, he cleared British garrisons in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, Fort Bute, and Natchez, Mississippi, and captured five forts. In doing so, Gálvez opened navigation on the Mississippi River north to the American settlement in Pittsburgh.

On May 25, 1780, British Colonel Henry Bird invaded Kentucky as part of a wider operation to clear American resistance from Quebec to the Gulf Coast. Their advance on New Orleans was repelled by Spanish Governor Gálvez's offensive on Mobile. Simultaneous British attacks were repulsed on St. Louis by the Spanish Lieutenant Governor de Leyba, and on the Virginia County courthouse in Cahokia, Illinois, by Lieutenant Colonel Clark. The British initiative under Bird from Detroit was ended at the rumored approach of Clark. The scale of violence in the Licking River Valley, was extreme "even for frontier standards." It led to English and German settlements, who joined Clark's militia when the British and their hired German soldiers withdrew to the Great Lakes. The Americans responded with a major offensive along the Mad River in August which met with some success in the Battle of Piqua but did not end Indian raids.

French soldier Augustin de La Balme led a Canadian militia in an attempt to capture Detroit, but they dispersed when Miami natives led by Little Turtle attacked the encamped settlers on November 5. The war in the west stalemated with the British garrison sitting in Detroit and the Virginians expanding westward settlements north of the Ohio River in the face of British-allied Indian resistance.

In 1781, Galvez and Pollock campaigned east along the Gulf Coast to secure West Florida, including British-held Mobile and Pensacola. The Spanish operations impaired the British supply of armaments to British Indian allies, which effectively suspended a military alliance to attack settlers between the Mississippi River and the Appalachian Mountains.

In 1782, large scale retaliations between settlers and Native Americans in the region included the Gnadenhutten massacre and the Crawford expedition. The 1782 Battle of Blue Licks was one of the last major engagements of the war. News of the treaty between Great Britain and the United States arrived late that year. By this time, about 7% of Kentucky settlers had been killed in battles against Native Americans, contrasted with 1% of the population killed in the Thirteen Colonies. Lingering resentments led to continued fighting in the west after the war officially ended.

British defeat

Main article: Yorktown campaign
Two lines of warships at sea sailing with full sails downwind away from the viewer and firing broadsides at one another; in the center foreground receding into the left background, six of the French fleet; in the right foreground receding to the center four of the British fleet.
A French Navy fleet (left) engages the British in the Battle of the Chesapeake on September 5, 1781
Center foreground a British officer on the left standing surrenders to a mounted Continental officer; far left foreground receding into the center background, a British line of infantry then mounted cavalry, with a large white flag of surrender; far right foreground receding into the center background, a Continental line of infantry, then mounted cavalry, with a large US flag of the Army.
British general Cornwallis surrenders at Yorktown in October 1781

Clinton spent most of 1781 based in New York City; he failed to construct a coherent operational strategy, partly due to his difficult relationship with Admiral Marriot Arbuthnot. In Charleston, Cornwallis independently developed an aggressive plan for a campaign in Virginia, which he hoped would isolate Greene's army in the Carolinas and cause the collapse of Patriot resistance in the South. This strategy was approved by Lord Germain in London, but neither informed Clinton.

Washington and Rochambeau discussed their options: Washington wanted to attack the British in New York, and Rochambeau wanted to attack them in Virginia, where Cornwallis's forces were less established. Washington eventually gave way, and Lafayette took a combined Franco-American force into Virginia. Clinton misinterpreted his movements as preparations for an attack on New York and instructed Cornwallis to establish a fortified sea base, where the Royal Navy could evacuate British troops to help defend New York.

When Lafayette entered Virginia, Cornwallis complied with Clinton's orders and withdrew to Yorktown, where he constructed strong defenses and awaited evacuation. An agreement by the Spanish Navy to defend the French West Indies allowed Admiral François Joseph Paul de Grasse to relocate to the Atlantic seaboard, a move Arbuthnot did not anticipate. This provided Lafayette naval support, while the failure of previous combined operations at Newport and Savannah meant their coordination was planned more carefully. Despite repeated urging from his subordinates, Cornwallis made no attempt to engage Lafayette before he could establish siege lines. Expecting to be withdrawn within a few days, he also abandoned the outer defenses, which were promptly occupied by the besiegers and hastened British defeat.

On August 31, a Royal Navy fleet under Thomas Graves left New York for Yorktown. After landing troops and munitions for the besiegers on August 30, de Grasse remained in Chesapeake Bay and intercepted him on September 5; although the Battle of the Chesapeake was indecisive in terms of losses, Graves was forced to retreat, leaving Cornwallis isolated. An attempted breakout over York River at Gloucester Point failed due to bad weather. Under heavy bombardment with dwindling supplies, on October 16 Cornwallis sent emissaries to General Washington to negotiate surrender; after twelve hours of negotiations, the terms of surrender were finalized the following day. Responsibility for defeat was the subject of fierce public debate between Cornwallis, Clinton, and Germain. Clinton ultimately took most of the blame and spent the rest of his life in relative obscurity.

Subsequent to Yorktown, American forces were assigned to supervise the armistice between Washington and Clinton made to facilitate British departure following the January 1782 law of Parliament forbidding any further British offensive action in North America. British-American negotiations in Paris led to signed preliminary agreements in November 1782, which acknowledged U.S. independence. The enacted Congressional war objective, a British withdrawal from North America and cession of these regions to the U.S., was completed in stages in East Coast cities.

In the U.S. South, Generals Greene and Wayne observed the British remove their troops from Charleston on December 14, 1782. Loyalist provincial militias of whites and free blacks and Loyalists with slaves were transported to Nova Scotia and the British West Indies. Native American allies of the British and some freed blacks were left to escape unaided through the American lines.

On April 9, 1783, Washington issued orders that "all acts of hostility" were to cease immediately. That same day, by arrangement with Washington, Carleton issued a similar order to British troops. As directed by a Congressional resolution of May 26, 1783, all non-commissioned officers and enlisted were furloughed "to their homes" until the "definitive treaty of peace", when they would be automatically discharged. The U.S. armies were directly disbanded in the field as of Washington's General Orders on June 2, 1783. Once the Treaty of Paris was signed with Britain on September 3, 1783, Washington resigned as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army. The last British occupation of New York City ended on November 25, 1783, with the departure of Clinton's replacement, General Sir Guy Carleton.

Strategy and commanders

West Point Military Academy MAP of America east of the Mississippi River. Campaigns noted in New England; in the middle colonies with three British (red sailing ship) naval victories; in the South with two British naval victories, and in Virginia with one French (blue sailing ship) naval victory. A Timeline bar graph below shows almost all British (red bar) victories on the left in the first half of the war, and almost all US (blue bar) victories on the right in the second half of the war.
A map of principal campaigns in the American Revolutionary War with British movements in red and American movements in blue; the timeline shows the British won most battles in the war's first half, but Americans won the most in the second.

To win their insurrection, Washington and the Continental Army needed to outlast the British will to fight. To restore British America, the British had to defeat the Continental Army quickly and compel the Second Continental Congress to retract its claim to self-governance. Historian Terry M. Mays of The Citadel identifies three separate types of warfare during the Revolutionary War. The first was a colonial conflict in which objections to imperial trade regulation were as significant as taxation policy. The second was a civil war between American Patriots, American Loyalists, and those who preferred to remain neutral. Particularly in the south, many battles were fought between Patriots and Loyalists with no British involvement, leading to divisions that continued after independence was achieved.

The third element was a global war between France, Spain, the Dutch Republic, and Britain, with America serving as one of several different war theaters. After entering the Revolutionary War in 1778, France provided the Americans money, weapons, soldiers, and naval assistance, while French troops fought under U.S. command in North America. While Spain did not formally join the war in America, they provided access to the Mississippi River and captured British possessions on the Gulf of Mexico that denied bases to the Royal Navy, retook Menorca and besieged Gibraltar in Europe. Although the Dutch Republic was no longer a major power prior to 1774, they still dominated the European carrying trade, and Dutch merchants made large profits by shipping French-supplied munitions to the Patriots. This ended when Britain declared war in December 1780, and the conflict proved disastrous to the Dutch economy.

American strategy

The Second Continental Congress stood to benefit if the Revolution evolved into a protracted war. Colonial state populations were largely prosperous and depended on local production for food and supplies rather than on imports from Britain. The thirteen colonies were spread across most of North American Atlantic seaboard, stretching 1,000 miles. Most colonial farms were remote from the seaports, and control of four or five major ports did not give Britain control over American inland areas. Each state had established internal distribution systems. Motivation was also a major asset: each colonial capital had its own newspapers and printers, and the Patriots enjoyed more popular support than the Loyalists. Britain hoped that the Loyalists would do much of the fighting, but found that the Loyalists did not engage as significantly as they had hoped.

Continental Army

Main article: Continental Army See also: Militia (United States) § American Revolutionary War (1775-1783), and Minutemen
Formal painting of General George Washington, standing in uniform, as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army
A 1776 portrait of Washington by Charles Willson Peale, now housed in the Brooklyn Museum

When the Revolutionary War began, the Second Continental Congress lacked a professional army or navy. However, each of the colonies had a long-established system of local militia, which were combat-tested in support of British regulars in the French and Indian War. The colonial state legislatures independently funded and controlled their local militias.

Militiamen were lightly armed, had little training, and usually did not have uniforms. Their units served for only a few weeks or months at a time and lacked the training and discipline of more experienced soldiers. Local county militias were reluctant to travel far from home and were unavailable for extended operations. To compensate for this, the Continental Congress established a regular force known as the Continental Army on June 14, 1775, which proved to be the origin of the modern United States Army, and appointed Washington as its commander-in-chief. However, it suffered significantly from the lack of an effective training program and from largely inexperienced officers. Each state legislature appointed officers for both county and state militias and their regimental Continental line officers; although Washington was required to accept Congressional appointments, he was permitted to choose and command his own generals, such as Greene; his chief of artillery, Knox; and Alexander Hamilton, the chief of staff. One of Washington's most successful general officer recruits was Steuben, a veteran of the Prussian general staff who wrote the Revolutionary War Drill Manual. The development of the Continental Army was always a work in progress and Washington used both his regulars and state militias throughout the war; when properly employed, the combination allowed them to overwhelm smaller British forces, as they did in battles at Concord, Boston, Bennington, and Saratoga. Both sides used partisan warfare, but the state militias effectively suppressed Loyalist activity when British regulars were not in the area.

Washington designed the overall military strategy in cooperation with Congress, established the principle of civilian supremacy in military affairs, personally recruited his senior officer corps, and kept the states focused on a common goal. Washington initially employed the inexperienced officers and untrained troops in Fabian strategies rather than risk frontal assaults against Britain's professional forces. Over the course of the war, Washington lost more battles than he won, but he never surrendered his troops and maintained a fighting force in the face of British field armies.

By prevailing European standards, the armies in America were relatively small, limited by lack of supplies and logistics. The British were constrained by the logistical difficulty of transporting troops across the Atlantic and their dependence on local supplies. Washington never directly commanded more than 17,000 men, and the combined Franco-American army in the decisive American victory at Yorktown was only about 19,000. At the beginning of 1776, Patriot forces consisted of 20,000 men, with two-thirds in the Continental Army and the other third in the state militias. About 250,000 American men served as regulars or as militia for the revolutionary cause during the war, but there were never more than 90,000 men under arms at any time.

On the whole, American officers never equaled their British opponents in tactics and maneuvers, and they lost most of the pitched battles. The great successes at Boston (1776), Saratoga (1777), and Yorktown (1781) were won by trapping the British far from base with a greater number of troops. After 1778, Washington's army was transformed into a more disciplined and effective force, mostly as a product of Baron von Steuben's military training. Immediately after the Continental Army emerged from Valley Forge in June 1778, it proved its ability to match the military capabilities of the British at the Battle of Monmouth, including a black Rhode Island regiment fending off a British bayonet attack and then counter charging the British for the first time as part of Washington's army. After the Battle of Monmouth, Washington came to realize that saving entire towns was not necessary, but preserving his army and keeping the revolutionary spirit alive was more important. Washington informed Henry Laurens, then president of the Second Continental Congress, "that the possession of our towns, while we have an army in the field, will avail them little."

Although the Continental Congress was responsible for the war effort and provided supplies to the troops, Washington took it upon himself to pressure Congress and the state legislatures to provide the essentials of war; there was never nearly enough. Congress evolved in its committee oversight and established the Board of War, which included members of the military. Because the Board of War was also a committee ensnared with its own internal procedures, Congress also created the post of Secretary of War, appointing Major General Benjamin Lincoln to the position in February 1781. Washington worked closely with Lincoln to coordinate civilian and military authorities and took charge of training and supplying the army.

Continental Navy

Main articles: Continental Navy and Continental Marines See also: Privateer § American_Revolutionary_War, and Whaleboat War Further information: Naval battles of the American Revolutionary War
Sail warships at sea with full sail; in the center middle ground, the US ship; in the background, four French warships in a haze giving it a cannon salute with gunpowder; small boats also in the water in the middle ground.
USS Ranger commanded by Captain John Paul Jones

During the first summer of the war, Washington began outfitting schooners and other small seagoing vessels to prey on ships supplying the British in Boston. The Second Continental Congress established the Continental Navy on October 13, 1775, and appointed Esek Hopkins as its first commander; for most of the war, the Continental Navy included only a handful of small frigates and sloops, supported by privateers. On November 10, 1775, Congress authorized the creation of the Continental Marines, which ultimately evolved into the United States Marine Corps.

John Paul Jones became the first American naval hero when he captured HMS Drake on April 24, 1778, the first victory for any American military vessel in British waters. The last such victory was by the frigate USS Alliance, commanded by Captain John Barry. On March 10, 1783, the Alliance outgunned HMS Sybil in a 45-minute duel while escorting Spanish gold from Havana to the Congress in Philadelphia. After Yorktown, all US Navy ships were sold or given away; it was the first time in America's history that it had no fighting forces on the high seas.

Congress primarily commissioned privateers to reduce costs and to take advantage of the large proportion of colonial sailors found in the British Empire. In total, they included 1,700 ships that successfully captured 2,283 enemy ships to damage the British effort and to enrich themselves with the proceeds from the sale of cargo and the ship itself. About 55,000 sailors served aboard American privateers during the war.

France

Main article: France in the American Revolution Further information: History of the French Navy § Louis XVI, and Military history of France § Ancien Régime

At the beginning of the war, the Americans had no major international allies, since most nation-states waited to see how the conflict unfolded. Over time, the Continental Army established its military credibility. Battles such as the Battle of Bennington, the Battles of Saratoga, and even defeats such as the Battle of Germantown, proved decisive in gaining the support of powerful European nations, including France, Spain, and the Dutch Republic; the Dutch moved from covertly supplying the Americans with weapons and supplies to overtly supporting them.

The decisive American victory at Saratoga convinced France, which was already a long-time rival of Britain, to offer the Americans the Treaty of Amity and Commerce. The two nations also agreed to a defensive Treaty of Alliance to protect their trade and also guaranteed American independence from Britain. To engage the United States as a French ally militarily, the treaty was conditioned on Britain initiating a war on France to stop it from trading with the U.S. Spain and the Dutch Republic were invited to join by both France and the United States in the treaty, but neither was responsive to the request.

On June 13, 1778, France declared war on Great Britain, and it invoked the French military alliance with the U.S., which ensured additional U.S. private support for French possessions in the Caribbean. Washington worked closely with the soldiers and navy that France would send to America, primarily through Lafayette on his staff. French assistance made critical contributions required to defeat Cornwallis at Yorktown in 1781.

British strategy

Further information: Seven Years' War

The British military had considerable experience fighting in North America. However, in previous conflicts they benefited from local logistics and support from the colonial militia. In the American Revolutionary War, reinforcements had to come from Europe, and maintaining large armies over such distances was extremely complex; ships could take three months to cross the Atlantic, and orders from London were often outdated by the time they arrived.

Prior to the conflict, the colonies were largely autonomous economic and political entities, with no centralized area of ultimate strategic importance. This meant that, unlike Europe where the fall of a capital city often ended wars, that in America continued even after the loss of major settlements such as Philadelphia, the seat of Congress, New York, and Charleston. British power was reliant on the Royal Navy, whose dominance allowed them to resupply their own expeditionary forces while preventing access to enemy ports. However, the majority of the American population was agrarian, rather than urban; supported by the French navy and blockade runners based in the Dutch Caribbean, their economy was able to survive. Lord North, Prime Minister since 1770, delegated control of the war in North America to Lord George Germain and the Earl of Sandwich, who was head of the Royal Navy from 1771 to 1782. Defeat at Saratoga in 1777 made it clear the revolt would not be easily suppressed, especially after the Franco-American alliance of February 1778. With Spain also expected to join the conflict, the Royal Navy needed to prioritize either the war in America or in Europe; Germain advocated the former, Sandwich the latter.

North initially backed the Southern strategy attempting to exploit divisions between the mercantile north and slave-owning south, but after the defeat of Yorktown, he was forced to accept that this policy had failed. It was clear the war was lost, although the Royal Navy forced the French to relocate their fleet to the Caribbean in November 1781 and resumed a close blockade of American trade. The resulting economic damage and rising inflation meant the US was now eager to end the war, while France was unable to provide further loans; Congress could no longer pay its soldiers. The geographical size of the colonies and limited manpower meant the British could not simultaneously conduct military operations and occupy territory without local support. Debate persists over whether their defeat was inevitable; one British statesman described it as "like trying to conquer a map". While Ferling argues Patriot victory was nothing short of a miracle, Ellis suggests the odds always favored the Americans, especially after Howe squandered the chance of a decisive British success in 1776, an "opportunity that would never come again". The US military history speculates the additional commitment of 10,000 fresh troops in 1780 would have placed British victory "within the realm of possibility".

British Army

Main article: British Army during the American Revolutionary War See also: Loyalist (American Revolution) § Military service
Portrait of the British commander-in-chief, Sir Thomas Gage in dress uniform.
Sir Thomas Gage, British Army Commander from 1763 to 1775

The expulsion of France from North America in 1763 led to a drastic reduction in British troop levels in the colonies; in 1775, there were only 8,500 regular soldiers among a civilian population of 2.8 million. The bulk of military resources in the Americas were focused on defending sugar islands in the Caribbean; Jamaica alone generated more revenue than all thirteen American colonies combined. With the end of the Seven Years' War, the permanent army in Britain was also cut back, which resulted in administrative difficulties when the war began a decade later.

Over the course of the war, there were four separate British commanders-in-chief. The first was Thomas Gage, appointed in 1763, whose initial focus was establishing British rule in former French areas of Canada. Many in London blamed the revolt on his failure to take firm action earlier, and he was relieved after the heavy losses incurred at the Battle of Bunker Hill. His replacement was Sir William Howe, a member of the Whig faction in Parliament who opposed the policy of coercion advocated by Lord North; Cornwallis, who later surrendered at Yorktown, was one of many senior officers who initially refused to serve in North America.

The 1775 campaign showed the British overestimated the capabilities of their own troops and underestimated the colonial militia, requiring a reassessment of tactics and strategy, and allowing the Patriots to take the initiative. Howe's responsibility is still debated; despite receiving large numbers of reinforcements, Bunker Hill seems to have permanently affected his self-confidence and lack of tactical flexibility meant he often failed to follow up opportunities. Many of his decisions were attributed to supply problems, such as his failure to pursue Washington's beaten army. Having lost the confidence of his subordinates, he was recalled after Burgoyne surrendered at Saratoga.

Following the failure of the Carlisle Commission, British policy changed from treating the Patriots as subjects who needed to be reconciled to enemies who had to be defeated. In 1778, Howe was replaced by Sir Henry Clinton. Regarded as an expert on tactics and strategy, like his predecessors Clinton was handicapped by chronic supply issues. In addition, Clinton's strategy was compromised by conflict with political superiors in London and his colleagues in North America, especially Admiral Mariot Arbuthnot, replaced in early 1781 by Rodney. He was neither notified nor consulted when Germain approved Cornwallis's invasion of the south in 1781 and delayed sending him reinforcements believing the bulk of Washington's army was still outside New York City. After the surrender at Yorktown, Clinton was relieved by Carleton, whose major task was to oversee the evacuation of Loyalists and British troops from Savannah, Charleston, and New York City.

German troops

Main article: Hessian (soldier)
Hessian troops surrender after Battle of Trenton, December 1776
Hessian troops surrender after Washington's victory at the Battle of Trenton in December 1776

During the 18th century, states commonly hired foreign soldiers, including Britain. When it became clear additional troops were needed to suppress the revolt in America, it was decided to employ professional German soldiers. There were several reasons for this, including public sympathy for the Patriot cause, a historical reluctance to expand the British army and the time needed to recruit and train new regiments. Many smaller states in the Holy Roman Empire had a long tradition of renting their armies to the highest bidder. The most important was Hesse-Kassel, known as "the Mercenary State".

The first supply agreements were signed by the North administration in late 1775; 30,000 Germans served in the American War. Often generically referred to as "Hessians", they included men from many other states, including Hanover and Brunswick. Sir Henry Clinton recommended recruiting Russian troops whom he rated very highly, having seen them in action against the Ottomans; however, negotiations with Catherine the Great made little progress.

Unlike previous wars their use led to intense political debate in Britain, France, and even Germany, where Frederick the Great refused to provide passage through his territories for troops hired for the American war. In March 1776, the agreements were challenged in Parliament by Whigs who objected to "coercion" in general, and the use of foreign soldiers to subdue "British subjects". The debates were covered in detail by American newspapers; in May 1776 they received copies of the treaties themselves, provided by British sympathizers and smuggled into North America from London.

The prospect of foreign German soldiers being used in the colonies bolstered support for independence, more so than taxation and other acts combined; the King was accused of declaring war on his own subjects, leading to the idea there were now two separate governments. By apparently showing Britain was determined to go to war, it made hopes of reconciliation seem naive and hopeless, while the employment of what was regarded as "foreign mercenaries" became one of the charges levelled against George III in the Declaration of Independence. The Hessian reputation within Germany for brutality also increased support for the Patriot cause among German American immigrants.

The presence of over 150,000 German Americans meant both sides felt the German soldiers might be persuaded to desert; one reason Clinton suggested employing Russians was that he felt they were less likely to defect. When the first German troops arrived on Staten Island in August 1776, Congress approved the printing of handbills, promising land and citizenship to any willing to join the Patriot cause. The British launched a counter-campaign claiming deserters could be executed. Desertion among the Germans occurred throughout the war, with the highest rate of desertion occurring between the surrender at Yorktown and the Treaty of Paris. German regiments were central to the British war effort; of the estimated 30,000 sent to America, some 13,000 became casualties.

Revolution as civil war

Loyalists

Main article: Loyalist (American Revolution) See also: American Legion (Great Britain) and Prince of Wales' American Regiment
A wounded British officer falls from his horse after being struck by gunfire; another British officer to his rights puts his hands forwards to support the wounded rider; troops skirmish in the background; men lie dead at the riders feet.
American Patriots routed Loyalists at the Battle of Kings Mountain in 1780, raising Patriot morale.

Wealthy Loyalists convinced the British government that most of the colonists were sympathetic toward the Crown; consequently, British military planners relied on recruiting Loyalists, but had trouble recruiting sufficient numbers as the Patriots had widespread support. Approximately 25,000 Loyalists fought for the British throughout the war. Although Loyalists constituted about twenty percent of the colonial population, they were concentrated in distinct communities. Many of them lived among large plantation owners in the Tidewater region and South Carolina.

When the British began probing the backcountry in 1777–1778, they were faced with a major problem: any significant level of organized Loyalist activity required a continued presence of British regulars. The available manpower that the British had in America was insufficient to protect Loyalist territory and counter American offensives. The Loyalist militias in the South were constantly defeated by neighboring Patriot militia. The Patriot victory at the Battle of Kings Mountain irreversibly impaired Loyalist militia capability in the South.

When the early war policy was administered by Howe, the Crown's need to maintain Loyalist support prevented it from using the traditional revolt suppression methods. The British cause suffered when their troops ransacked local homes during an aborted attack on Charleston in 1779 that enraged both Patriots and Loyalists. After Congress rejected the Carlisle Peace Commission in 1778 and Westminster turned to "hard war" during Clinton's command, neutral colonists in the Carolinas often allied with the Patriots. Conversely, Loyalists gained support when Patriots intimidated suspected Tories by destroying property or tarring and feathering.

A Loyalist militia unit—the British Legion—provided some of the best troops in British service. It was commanded by Tarleton and gained a fearsome reputation in the colonies for "brutality and needless slaughter".

Women

Main article: Women in the American Revolution
Scene of Nancy Morgan Hart on the left with musket raised and child hiding behind her skirts, and behind; on the right two Loyalist soldiers are lying on the floor, and three are raising their hands defensively in alarm.
Nancy Hart single-handedly captured six Loyalist soldiers who barged into her home intending to ransack it.

Women played various roles during the Revolutionary War; they often accompanied their husbands when permitted. For example, throughout the war Martha Washington was known to visit and provide aid to her husband George at various American camps. Women often accompanied armies as camp followers to sell goods and perform necessary tasks in hospitals and camps, and numbered in the thousands during the war.

Women also assumed military roles: some dressed as men to directly support combat, fight, or act as spies on both sides. Anna Maria Lane joined her husband in the Army. The Virginia General Assembly later cited her bravery: she fought while dressed as a man and "performed extraordinary military services, and received a severe wound at the battle of Germantown ... with the courage of a soldier". On April 26, 1777, Sybil Ludington is said to have ridden to alert militia forces to the British's approach; she has been called the "female Paul Revere". Whether the ride occurred is questioned. A few others disguised themselves as men. Deborah Sampson fought until her gender was discovered and she was discharged as a result; Sally St. Clair was killed in action.

African Americans

Main article: African Americans in the Revolutionary War
A scene of four uniformed soldiers of the Continental 1st Rhode Island Regiment. On the left, a black and a white soldier formally at "Attention" with Brown Bess muskets; on the right, a downcast white soldier walking back into formation with an officer barking at him holding a cat-o-nine tails for flogging.
Continental Army soldiers, including one from the 1st Rhode Island Regiment on the left

When war began, the population of the Thirteen Colonies included an estimated 500,000 slaves, predominantly used as labor on Southern plantations. In November 1775, Lord Dunmore, the royal governor of Virginia, issued a proclamation that promised freedom to any Patriot-owned slaves willing to bear arms. Although the announcement helped to fill a temporary manpower shortage, white Loyalist prejudice meant recruits were eventually redirected to non-combatant roles. The Loyalists' motive was to deprive Patriot planters of labor rather than to end slavery; Loyalist-owned slaves were returned.

The 1779 Philipsburg Proclamation issued by Clinton extended the offer of freedom to Patriot-owned slaves throughout the colonies. It persuaded entire families to escape to British lines, many of which were employed growing food for the army by removing the requirement for military service. While Clinton organized the Black Pioneers, he also ensured fugitive slaves were returned to Loyalist owners with orders that they were not to be punished. As the war progressed, service as regular soldiers in British units became increasingly common; Black Loyalists formed two regiments of the Charleston garrison in 1783.

Estimates of the numbers who served the British during the war vary from 25,000 to 50,000, excluding those who escaped during wartime. Thomas Jefferson estimated that Virginia may have lost 30,000 slaves to escapes. In South Carolina, nearly 25,000 slaves (about 30 percent of the enslaved population) either fled, migrated, or died, which significantly disrupted the plantation economies both during and after the war.

Black Patriots were barred from the Continental Army until Washington convinced Congress in January 1778 that there was no other way to replace losses from disease and desertion. The 1st Rhode Island Regiment formed in February included former slaves whose owners were compensated; however, only 140 of its 225 soldiers were black and recruitment stopped in June 1788. Ultimately, around 5,000 African Americans served in the Continental Army and Navy in a variety of roles, while another 4,000 were employed in Patriot militia units, aboard privateers, or as teamsters, servants, and spies. After the war, a small minority received land grants or Congressional pensions; many others were returned to their masters post-war despite earlier promises of freedom.

As a Patriot victory became increasingly likely, the treatment of Black Loyalists became a point of contention; after the surrender of Yorktown in 1781, Washington insisted all escapees be returned but Cornwallis refused. In 1782 and 1783, around 8,000 to 10,000 freed blacks were evacuated by the British from Charleston, Savannah, and New York; some moved onto London, while 3,000 to 4,000 settled in Nova Scotia. White Loyalists transported 15,000 enslaved blacks to Jamaica and the Bahamas. The free Black Loyalists who migrated to the British West Indies included regular soldiers from Dunmore's Ethiopian Regiment, and those from Charleston who helped garrison the Leeward Islands.

Native Americans

Main page: Category:Native Americans in the American Revolution
Portrait of British regular army Colonel Joseph Brant, Iroquois Mohawk.
Colonel Joseph Brant of the British-led Iroquois Mohawks in the war

Most Native Americans east of the Mississippi River were affected by the war, and many tribes were divided over how to respond. A few tribes were friendly with the colonists, but most Natives opposed the union of the Colonies as a potential threat to their territory. Approximately 13,000 Natives fought on the British side, with the largest group coming from the Iroquois tribes who deployed around 1,500 men.

Early in July 1776, Cherokee allies of Britain attacked the short-lived Washington District of North Carolina. Their defeat splintered both Cherokee settlements and people, and was directly responsible for the rise of the Chickamauga Cherokee, who perpetuated the Cherokee–American wars against American settlers for decades after hostilities with Britain ended.

Muscogee and Seminole allies of Britain fought against Americans in Georgia and South Carolina. In 1778, a force of 800 Muscogee destroyed American settlements along the Broad River in Georgia. Muscogee warriors also joined Thomas Brown's raids into South Carolina and assisted Britain during the siege of Savannah. Many Native Americans were involved in the fight between Britain and Spain on the Gulf Coast and along the British side of the Mississippi River. Thousands of Muscogee, Chickasaw, and Choctaw fought in major battles such as the Battle of Fort Charlotte, the Battle of Mobile, and the siege of Pensacola.

The Iroquois Confederacy was shattered as a result of the American Revolutionary War. The Seneca, Onondaga, and Cayuga tribes sided with the British; members of the Mohawks fought on both sides; and many Tuscarora and Oneida sided with the Americans. To retaliate against raids on American settlement by Loyalists and their Indian allies, the Continental Army dispatched the Sullivan Expedition throughout New York to debilitate the Iroquois tribes that had sided with the British. Mohawk leaders Joseph Louis Cook and Joseph Brant sided with the Americans and the British respectively, which further exacerbated the split.

In the western theater, conflicts between settlers and Native Americans led to lingering distrust. In the 1783 Treaty of Paris, Great Britain ceded control of the disputed lands between the Great Lakes and the Ohio River, but Native inhabitants were not a part of the peace negotiations. Tribes in the Northwest Territory joined as the Western Confederacy and allied with the British to resist American settlement, and their conflict continued after the Revolutionary War as the Northwest Indian War.

Peace negotiations

Further information: Treaty of Paris (1783)
Portrait of the four principal US ministers in Paris; left to right, John Jay, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Henry Laurens, and their secretary on the far right.
Treaty of Paris by Benjamin West portrays the American mission of (left–right): John Jay, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Henry Laurens, and William Temple Franklin. The portrait was never completed because the British commissioners refused to pose. Laurens, pictured, was actually in London at the time it was painted.
A New York City street scene with a mounted George Washington riding at the head of a parade.
Washington enters New York City at British evacuation, November 1783. St. Paul's Chapel is on left. The parade route in 1783 went from Bull's Head Tavern on Bowery, then continued down Chatham, Pearl, Wall, and ended at Cape's Tavern on Broadway.

The terms presented by the Carlisle Peace Commission in 1778 included acceptance of the principle of self-government. Parliament would recognize Congress as the governing body, suspend any objectionable legislation, surrender its right to local colonial taxation, and discuss including American representatives in the House of Commons. In return, all property confiscated from Loyalists would be returned, British debts honored, and locally enforced martial law accepted. However, Congress demanded either immediate recognition of independence or the withdrawal of all British troops; they knew the commission were not authorized to accept these, bringing negotiations to a rapid end.

On February 27, 1782, a Whig motion to end the offensive war in America was carried by 19 votes. North resigned, obliging the king to invite Lord Rockingham to form a government; a consistent supporter of the Patriot cause, he made a commitment to U.S. independence a condition of doing so. George III reluctantly accepted and the new government took office on March 27, 1782; however, Rockingham died unexpectedly on July 1, and was replaced by Lord Shelburne who acknowledged American independence.

When Lord Rockingham was elevated to Prime Minister, Congress consolidated its diplomatic consuls in Europe into a peace delegation at Paris. The dean of the delegation was Benjamin Franklin. He had become a celebrity in the French Court, but he was also influential in the courts of Prussia and Austria. Since the 1760s, Franklin had been an organizer of British American inter-colony cooperation, and then served as a colonial lobbyist to Parliament in London. John Adams had been consul to the Dutch Republic and was a prominent early New England Patriot. John Jay of New York had been consul to Spain and was a past president of the Continental Congress. As consul to the Dutch Republic, Henry Laurens had secured a preliminary agreement for a trade agreement. Although active in the preliminaries, he was not a signer of the conclusive treaty.

The Whig negotiators included long-time friend of Franklin David Hartley, and Richard Oswald, who had negotiated Laurens' release from the Tower of London. The Preliminary Peace signed on November 30 met four key Congressional demands: independence, territory up to the Mississippi, navigation rights into the Gulf of Mexico, and fishing rights in Newfoundland.

British strategy was to strengthen the U.S. sufficiently to prevent France from regaining a foothold in North America, and they had little interest in these proposals. However, divisions between their opponents allowed them to negotiate separately with each to improve their overall position, starting with the American delegation in September 1782. The French and Spanish sought to improve their position by creating the U.S. dependent on them for support against Britain, thus reversing the losses of 1763. Both parties tried to negotiate a settlement with Britain excluding the Americans; France proposed setting the western boundary of the U.S. along the Appalachians, matching the British 1763 Proclamation Line. The Spanish suggested additional concessions in the vital Mississippi River Basin, but required the cession of Georgia in violation of the Franco-American alliance.

Facing difficulties with Spain over claims involving the Mississippi River, and from France who was still reluctant to agree to American independence until all her demands were met, John Jay told the British that he was willing to negotiate directly with them, cutting off France and Spain, and Prime Minister Lord Shelburne, in charge of the British negotiations, agreed. Key agreements for the United States in obtaining peace included recognition of US independence; all of the territory east of the Mississippi River, north of Florida and south of Canada; and fishing rights in the Grand Banks, off the coast of Newfoundland and in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence. The United States and Great Britain were each given perpetual access to the Mississippi River.

An Anglo-American Preliminary Peace was formally entered into in November 1782, and Congress endorsed the settlement on April 15, 1783. It announced the achievement of peace with independence, and the conclusive treaty was signed on September 2, 1783, in Paris, effective the following day when Britain signed its treaty with France. John Adams, who helped draft the treaty, claimed it represented "one of the most important political events that ever happened on the globe". Ratified respectively by Congress and Parliament, the final versions were exchanged in Paris the following spring. On November 25, the last British troops remaining in the U.S. were evacuated from New York to Halifax.

Aftermath

Main article: American Revolution

Territory

The expanse of territory that was now the U.S. included millions of sparsely settled acres south of the Great Lakes line between the Appalachian Mountains and the Mississippi River, much of which was part of Canada. The tentative colonial migration west became a flood during the war.

Britain's extended post-war policy for the U.S. continued to try to establish an Indian barrier state below the Great Lakes as late as 1814 during the War of 1812. The formally acquired western American lands continued to be populated by Indigenous tribes that had mostly been British allies. In practice the British refused to abandon the forts on territory they formally transferred. Instead, they provisioned military allies for continuing frontier raids and sponsored the Northwest Indian War (1785–1795). British sponsorship of local warfare on the U.S. continued until the Anglo-American Jay Treaty, authored by Hamilton, went into effect on February 29, 1796.

Of the European powers with American colonies adjacent to the newly created U.S., Spain was most threatened by American independence, and it was correspondingly the most hostile to it. Its territory adjacent to the U.S. was relatively undefended, so Spanish policy developed a combination of initiatives. Spanish soft power diplomatically challenged the British territorial cession west to the Mississippi River and the previous northern boundaries of Spanish Florida. It imposed a high tariff on American goods, then blocked American settler access to the port of New Orleans. At the same time, the Spanish also sponsored war within the U.S. by Indian proxies in its Southwest Territory ceded by France to Britain, then Britain to the Americans.

Casualties and losses

Further information: Prisoners in the American Revolutionary War
A cemetery; grave stones in the foreground in staggered, irregular rows; behind them grass covered mounds of dead; an American flag in the background along a tree line.
Mass graves from the Battles of Saratoga in Salem, New York

The total loss of life throughout the conflict is largely unknown. As was typical in wars of the era, diseases such as smallpox claimed more lives than battle. Between 1775 and 1782, a smallpox epidemic throughout North America killed an estimated 130,000. Historian Joseph Ellis suggests that Washington having his troops inoculated against the disease was one of his most important decisions.

Up to 70,000 American Patriots died during active military service. Of these, approximately 6,800 were killed in battle, while at least 17,000 died from disease. The majority of the latter died while prisoners of war of the British, mostly in the prison ships in New York Harbor. The number of Patriots seriously wounded or disabled by the war has been estimated from 8,500 to 25,000.

The French suffered 2,112 killed in combat in the United States. The Spanish lost 124 killed and 247 wounded in West Florida.

A British report in 1781 puts their total Army deaths at 6,046 in North America (1775–1779). Approximately 7,774 Germans died in British service in addition to 4,888 deserters; among those labeled German deserters, however, it is estimated that 1,800 were killed in combat.

Legacy

The U.S. motto Novus ordo seclorum, meaning "A New Age Now Begins", is paraphrased from Thomas Paine's Common Sense, published January 10, 1776. "We have it in our power to begin the world over again", Paine wrote in it.

The American Revolution set an example to overthrow both monarchy and colonial governments. The United States has the world's oldest written constitution, which was used as a model in other countries, sometimes word-for-word. The Revolution inspired revolutions in France, Haiti, Latin America, and elsewhere.

Although the Revolution eliminated many forms of inequality, it did little to change the status of women, despite the role they played in winning independence. Most significantly, it failed to end slavery. While many were uneasy over the contradiction of demanding liberty for some, yet denying it to others, the dependence of southern states on slave labor made abolition too great a challenge. Between 1774 and 1780, many of the states banned the importation of slaves, but the institution itself continued. In 1782, Virginia passed a law permitting manumission and over the next eight years more than 10,000 slaves were given their freedom. The number of abolitionist movements greatly increased, and by 1804 all the northern states had outlawed it. However, slavery continued to be a serious social and political issue and caused divisions that would ultimately end in civil war.

Historiography

The body of historical writings on the American Revolution cite many motivations for the Patriot revolt. American Patriots stressed the denial of their constitutional rights as Englishmen, especially "no taxation without representation." Contemporaries credit the American Enlightenment with laying the intellectual, moral, and ethical foundations for the American Revolution among the Founding Fathers, who were influenced by the classical liberalism of John Locke and other Enlightenment writers and philosophers.

Two Treatises of Government has long been cited as a major influence on Revolutionary-era American thinking, but historians David Lundberg and Henry F. May contend that Locke's Essay Concerning Human Understanding was far more widely read. Historians since the 1960s have emphasized that the Patriot constitutional argument was made possible by the emergence of an American nationalism that united the Thirteen Colonies. In turn, that nationalism was rooted in a Republican value system that demanded consent of the governed and deeply opposed aristocratic control. In Britain, on the other hand, republicanism was largely a fringe ideology since it challenged the aristocratic control of the British monarchy and political system. Political power was not controlled by an aristocracy or nobility in the 13 colonies; instead, the colonial political system was based on the winners of free elections, which were open at the time to the majority of white men. In analysis of the Revolution, historians in recent decades have often cited three motivations behind it:

  • The Atlantic history view places the American story in a broader context, including subsequent revolutions in France and Haiti. It tends to reintegrate the historiographies of the American Revolution and the British Empire.
  • The "new social history" approach looks at community social structure to find cleavages that were magnified into colonial cleavages.
  • The ideological approach that centers on republicanism in the United States. Republicanism dictated there would be no royalty, aristocracy or national church but allowed for continuation of the British common law, which American lawyers and jurists understood and approved and used in their everyday practice. Historians have examined how the rising American legal profession adopted British common law to incorporate republicanism by selective revision of legal customs and by introducing more choices for courts.

Revolutionary War commemoration stamps

After the first U.S. postage stamp was issued in 1849, the U.S. Postal Service frequently issued commemorative stamps celebrating people and events of the Revolutionary War. The first such stamp was the Liberty Bell issue of 1926.

See also

Topics of the Revolution

Social history of the Revolution

Others in the American Revolution

Lists of Revolutionary military

Legacy and related

Notes

  1. Including the United Colonies period from 1776 to 1781 and the Confederation period from 1781 to 1783.
  2. Two independent "COR" Regiments, the Congress's Own Regiments, were recruited among British Canadiens. The 1st Canadian Regiment formed by James Livingston of Chambly, Quebec; and the 2nd Canadian Regiment formed by Moses Hazen of Saint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, Quebec.
  3. Augustin de La Balme independently marched on Detroit under a French flag with British Canadien militia recruited from western Quebec (Illinois County, Virginia) at the county seat of Kaskaskia, Cahokia, and Vincennes.
  4. (until 1779)
  5. Sixty-five percent of Britain's German auxiliaries employed in North America were from Hesse-Kassel (16,000) and Hesse-Hanau (2,422), flying this same flag.
  6. Twenty percent of Britain's German auxiliaries employed in North America were from Brunswick-Wolfenbüttel (5,723), flying this flag.
  7. The British hired over 30,000 professional soldiers from various German states who served in North America from 1775 to 1782. Commentators and historians often refer to them as mercenaries or auxiliaries, terms that are sometimes used interchangeably.
  8. (from 1779)
  9. A cease-fire in North America was proclaimed by Congress on April 11, 1783, under a cease-fire agreement between Great Britain and France on January 20, 1783. The final peace treaty was signed on September 3, 1783, and ratified on January 14, 1784, in the U.S., with final ratification exchanged in Europe on May 12, 1784. Hostilities in India continued until July 1783.
  10. Arnold served on the American side from 1775 to 1780; after defecting, he served on the British side from 1780 to 1783.
  11. 1780–1783
  12. The total in active duty service for the American Cause during the American Revolutionary War numbered 200,000.
  13. 5,000 sailors (peak), manning privateers, an additional 55,000 total sailors
  14. In 1780, General Rochambeau landed in Rhode Island with an independent command of about 6000 troops, and in 1781 Admiral de Grasse landed nearly 4000 troops who were detached to Lafayette's Continental Army surrounding British General Cornwallis in Virginia at Yorktown. An additional 750 French troops participated with the Spanish assault on Pensacola.
  15. For five months in 1778 from July to November, the French deployed a fleet to assist American operations off of New York, Rhode Island and Savannah commanded by Admiral d'Estaing, with little result. In September 1781, Admiral de Grasse left the West Indies to defeat the British fleet off Virginia at the Battle of the Chesapeake, then offloaded 3,000 troops and siege cannon to support Washington's siege of Yorktown.
  16. Governor Bernardo de Gálvez deployed 500 Spanish regulars in his New Orleans-based attacks on British-held locations west of the Mississippi River in Spanish Luisiana. In later engagements, Galvez had 800 regulars from New Orleans to assault Mobile, reinforced by infantry from regiments of Jose de Ezpeleta from Havana. In the assault on Pensacola, the Spanish Army contingents from Havana exceeded 9,000. For the final days of the siege at Pensacola siege, Admiral Jose Solano's fleet landed 1,600 crack infantry veterans from that of Gibraltar.
  17. Admiral Jose Solano's fleet arrived from the Mediterranean Sea to support the Spanish conquest of English Pensacola, West Florida.
  18. British 121,000 (global 1781) "Of 7,500 men in the Gibraltar garrison in September (including 400 in hospital), some 3,430 were always on duty".
  19. Royal Navy 94 ships-of-the-line global, 104 frigates global, 37 sloops global, 171,000 sailors
  20. Contains a detailed listing of American, French, British, German, and Loyalist regiments; indicates when they were raised, the main battles, and what happened to them. Also includes the main warships on both sides, and all the important battles.
  21. Beyond the 2112 deaths recorded by the French Government fighting for U.S. independence, additional men died fighting Britain in a war waged by France, Spain, and the Dutch Republic from 1778 to 1784, "overseas" from the American Revolution as posited by a British scholar in his "War of the American Revolution".
  22. Clodfelter reports that the total deaths among the British and their allies numbered 15,000 killed in battle or died of wounds. These included estimates of 3000 Germans, 3000 Loyalists and Canadians, 3000 lost at sea, and 500 Native Americans killed in battle or died of wounds.
  23. "Resolved, 4. That the foundation of English liberty, and of all free government, is a right in the people to participate in their legislative council: ... they are entitled to a free and exclusive power of legislation in their several provincial legislatures, where their right of representation can alone be preserved, in all cases of taxation and internal polity, subject only to the negative of their sovereign, ...: But, ... we cheerfully consent to the operation of such acts of the British parliament, as are bonafide, restrained to the regulation of our external commerce, for the purpose of securing the commercial advantages of the whole empire to the mother country, and the commercial benefits of its respective members; excluding every idea of taxation internal or external, ." quoted from the Declarations and Resolves of the First Continental Congress October 14, 1774.
  24. To learn when and where the attack would occur Washington asked for a volunteer among the Rangers to spy on activity behind enemy lines in Brooklyn. Young Nathan Hale stepped forward, but he was only able to provide Washington with nominal intelligence at that time. On September 21, Hale was recognized in a New York City tavern, and was apprehended with maps and sketches of British fortifications and troop positions in his pockets. Howe ordered that he be summarily hung as a spy without trial the next day.
  25. Tallmadge's cover name became John Bolton, and he was the architect of the spy ring.
  26. The American prisoners were subsequently sent to the infamous prison ships in the East River, where more American soldiers and sailors died of disease and neglect than died in every battle of the war combined.
  27. The mandate came by way of Benjamin Rush, chair of the Medical Committee. Congress had directed that all troops who had not previously survived smallpox infection be inoculated. In explaining himself to state governors, Washington lamented that he had lost "an army" to smallpox in 1776 by the "Natural way" of immunity.
  28. Bird's expedition numbered 150 British soldiers, several hundred Loyalists, and 700 Shawnee, Wyandot, and Ottawa auxiliaries. The force skirted into the eastern regions of Patriot-conquered western Quebec that had been annexed as Illinois County, Virginia. His target was Virginia militia stationed at Lexington. As they approached downriver on the Ohio River, rumor among the natives spread that the feared Colonel Clark had discovered their approach. Bird's natives and Loyalists abandoned their mission 90 miles upriver to loot settlements at the Licking River. At the surrender of Ruddles Station, safe passage to families was promised, but 200 were massacred by Indian raiders. Grenier maintains that "The slaughter the Indians and rangers perpetrated was unprecedented".
  29. Most Native Americans living in the area remembered the French better than any of the British they had met. Despite the British military nearby, the Miami people sought to avoid fighting with either Virginian Clark or Frenchman La Balme. On La Balme's horseback advance on Detroit, he paused two weeks to ruin a local French trader and loot surrounding Miami towns. La Balme might have treated them as allies, but he pushed Little Turtle into warrior leadership, converting most Miami tribes into British military allies, and launching the military career of one of the most successful opponents of westward settlement over the next 30 years.
  30. Governor Bernardo de Gálvez is only one of eight men made honorary US citizens for his service in the American Cause. see Bridget Bowman (29 December 2014). "Bernardo de Gálvez y Madrid's Very Good Year". Roll Call. The Economist Group. Retrieved April 25, 2020.
  31. In Nova Scotia, a province that had been a Massachusetts county in the 1600s, British settlement of freed black Loyalists from the American Revolutionary War secured its Canadian claim there. Britain continued its last "Bourbon War" with the French and Spanish primarily amidst their mutually conflicting territorial claims adjacent the Caribbean Sea, including Jamaica, adjacent the Mediterranean Sea including Gibraltar and Isla Mallorca, and adjacent the Indian Ocean during the Second Mysore War.
  32. Three branches of the United States Military trace their roots to the American Revolutionary War; the Army comes from the Continental Army; the Navy comes from the Continental Navy, appointing Esek Hopkins as the Navy's first commander. The Marine Corps links to the Continental Marines, created by Congress on November 10, 1775.
  33. Laurens was president of the Second Continental Congress at this time.
  34. In what was known as the Whaleboat War, American privateers mainly from New Jersey, Brooklyn, and Connecticut attacked and robbed British merchant ships and raided and robbed coastal communities of Long Island reputed to have Loyalist sympathies.
  35. King George III feared that the war's prospects would make it unlikely he could reclaim the North American colonies. During the later years of the Revolution, the British were drawn into numerous other conflicts about the globe.
  36. The final elements for US victory over Britain and US independence was assured by direct military intervention from France, as well as ongoing French supply and commercial trade over the final three years of the war.
  37. On militia see Boatner 1974, p. 707;
    Weigley 1973, ch. 2
  38. For the thirteen years prior to the Anglo-American commercial Jay Treaty of 1796 under President George Washington, the British maintained five forts in New York state: two forts at northern Lake Champlain, and three beginning at Fort Niagara stretching east along Lake Ontario. In the Northwest Territory, they garrisoned Fort Detroit and Fort Michilimackinac.
  39. There had been native-born Spanish (hidalgo) uprisings in several American colonies during the American Revolution, contesting mercantilist reforms of Carlos III that had removed privileges inherited from the Conquistadors among encomiendas, and they also challenged Jesuit dominance in the Catholic Church there. American ship captains were known to have smuggled banned copies of the Declaration of Independence into Spanish Caribbean ports, provoking Spanish colonial discontent.
  40. In addition to as many as 30% deaths in port cities, and especially high rates among the closely confined prisoner-of-war ships, scholars have reported large numbers lost among the Mexican population, and large percentage losses among the American Indian along trade routes, Atlantic to Pacific, Eskimo to Aztec.
  41. If the upper limit of 70,000 is accepted as the total net loss for the Patriots, it would make the conflict proportionally deadlier than the American Civil War. Uncertainty arises from the difficulties in accurately calculating the number of those who succumbed to disease, as it is estimated at least 10,000 died in 1776 alone.
  42. Elsewhere around the world, the French lost another approximately 5,000 total dead in conflicts 1778–1784.
  43. During the same time period in the Fourth Anglo-Dutch War, the Dutch suffered around 500 total killed, owing to the minor scale of their conflict with Britain.
  44. British returns in 1783 listed 43,633 rank and file deaths across the British Armed Forces. In the first three years of the Anglo-French War (1778), British list 9,372 soldiers killed in battle across the Americas; and 3,326 in the West Indies (1778–1780). In 1784, a British lieutenant compiled a detailed list of 205 British officers killed in action during British conflicts outside of North America, encompassing Europe, the Caribbean, and the East Indies. Extrapolations based upon this list puts British Army losses in the area of at least 4,000 killed or died of wounds outside of its North American engagements.
  45. Around 171,000 sailors served in the Royal Navy during British conflicts worldwide 1775–1784; approximately a quarter of whom had been pressed into service. Around 1,240 were killed in battle, while an estimated 18,500 died from disease (1776–1780). The greatest killer at sea was scurvy, a disease caused by vitamin C deficiency. It was not until 1795 that scurvy was eradicated from the Royal Navy after the Admiralty declared lemon juice and sugar were to be issued among the standard daily grog rations of sailors. Around 42,000 sailors deserted worldwide during the era. The impact on merchant shipping was substantial; 2,283 were taken by American privateers. Worldwide 1775–1784, an estimated 3,386 British merchant ships were seized by enemy forces during the war among Americans, French, Spanish, and Dutch.

Citations

Year dates enclosed in denote year of original printing
  1. Smith 1907, p. 86
  2. Everest 1977, p. 38
  3. Seineke 1981, p. 36, fn
  4. Tortora, Daniel J. (February 4, 2015). "Indian Patriots from Eastern Massachusetts: Six Perspectives". Journal of the American Revolution.
  5. ^ Bell 2015, Essay
  6. Axelrod 2014, p. 66
  7. Eelking 1893, p. 66
  8. "Duchy of Brunswick until 1918 (Germany)". www.crwflags.com. Flags of the World. Retrieved February 5, 2024.
  9. ^ Atwood 2002, pp. 1, 23
  10. Lowell 1884, pp. 14–15
  11. "Avalon Project - British-American Diplomcay : Proclamation Declaring the Cesssation of Arms; April 11, 1783".
  12. Simms 2009, pp. 615–618
  13. ^ Duncan, L. 1931, p. 371
  14. ^ Lanning 2009, pp. 195–196
  15. ^ Greene & Pole 2008, p. 328
  16. ^ U.S. Merchant Marine 2012, "Privateers and Mariners"
  17. Simmons 2003
  18. Paullin 1906, pp. 315–316
  19. Keiley 1912, "Rochambeau"
  20. "Rochambeau", Dictionary of American Biography
  21. ^ Beerman 1979, p. 181
  22. Britannica 1911, "C. H. Estaing"
  23. "F. J. P. de Grasse", Encyclopædia Britannica
  24. Dull 1987, p. 110
  25. Gayarré 1867, pp. 125–126
  26. Beerman 1979, pp. 177–179
  27. Rinaldi, "British Army 1775–1783"
  28. Chartrand 2006, p. 63
  29. ^ Winfield 2007
  30. ^ Mackesy 1993 , pp. 6, 176
  31. ^ Savas & Dameron 2006, p. xli
  32. Knesebeck 2017 , p. 9
  33. ^ Greene & Pole 2008, p. 393
  34. Burrows 2008a, "Patriots or Terrorists"
  35. Peckham (ed.) 1974
  36. ^ Clodfelter 2017, pp. 133–134
  37. Rignault 2004, pp. 20, 53
  38. Clodfelter 2017, pp. 75, 135
  39. Otfinoski 2008, p. 16
  40. Archuleta 2006, p. 69
  41. ^ Clodfelter 2017, p. 134
  42. Burrows 2008b, Forgotten Patriots
  43. Lawrence S. Kaplan, "The Treaty of Paris, 1783: A Historiographical Challenge", International History Review, Sept 1983, Vol. 5 Issue 3, pp 431–442
  44. Wallace 2015, "American Revolution"
  45. Calloway 2007, p. 4
  46. Lass 1980, p. 3.
  47. ^ Calloway 2007, p. 12
  48. Watson and Clark 1960, pp. 183–184
  49. Kay, Marvin L. Michael (April 1969). "The Payment of Provincial and Local Taxes in North Carolina, 1748–1771". The William and Mary Quarterly. 26 (2): 218–240. doi:10.2307/1918676. JSTOR 1918676. Retrieved September 1, 2024.
  50. Watson and Clark 1960, pp. 116, 187
  51. Morgan 2012, p. 40
  52. Ferling 2007, p. 23
  53. Morgan 2012, p. 52
  54. "The Weare NH Historical Society". wearehistoricalsociety.org. Retrieved July 1, 2024.
  55. Greene & Pole 2008, pp. 155–156
  56. Ammerman 1974, p. 15
  57. Olsen 1992, pp. 543–544
  58. Ferling 2003, p. 112
  59. Ferling 2015, p. 102
  60. ^ Greene & Pole 2008, p. 199
  61. Paine, Kramnick (Ed.) 1982, p. 21
  62. Ferling 2007, pp. 62–64
  63. Axelrod 2009, p. 83
  64. Fischer, D. 2004, p. 76
  65. ^ O'Shaughnessy 2013, p. 25
  66. Brown 1941, pp. 29–31
  67. Ketchum 2014a, p. 211
  68. Maier 1998, p. 25
  69. Ferling 2003, pp. 123–124
  70. Lecky 1892, vol. 3, pp. 162–165
  71. Davenport 1917, pp. 132–144
  72. Smith, D. 2012, pp. 21–23
  73. Miller, J. 1959, pp. 410–412
  74. Maier 1998, pp. 33–34
  75. McCullough 2005, pp. 119–122
  76. "The Declaration House Through Time", National Park Services
  77. Ferling 2007, pp. 112, 118
  78. Maier 1998, pp. 160–161
  79. Mays 2019, p. 2
  80. Mays 2019, p. 3
  81. ^ Greene & Pole 2008, p. 235
  82. CIA 2007, "Intelligence Until WWII"
  83. Clary, 2007, pp. 86–87
  84. Rose A. 2014 , p. 43
  85. Ferling, 2007, p. 29
  86. Fischer, p. 85
  87. Ferling 2007, pp. 129–19
  88. Ketchum 2014a, pp. 18, 54
  89. Ketchum 2014a, pp. 2–9
  90. ^ Higginbotham 1983 , pp. 75–77
  91. Ketchum 2014a, pp. 183, 198–209
  92. Rankin 1987, p. 63
  93. Chernow, 2010, p. 186
  94. Chernow, 2010, p. 187
  95. McCullough 2005, p. 53
  96. Frothingham 1903, pp. 100–101
  97. Ferling 2003, p. 183
  98. Alden 1969, pp. 188–190
  99. Smith, J. 1907 vol. 1, p. 293
  100. Glatthaar 2007, pp. 91, 93
  101. Greene & Pole 2008, pp. 504–505
  102. Randall 1990, pp. 38–39
  103. Lanctot 1967, pp. 141–246
  104. Stanley 2006, pp. 127–128
  105. Smith, J. 1907 vol. 1, p. 242
  106. Watson and Clark 1960, p. 203
  107. Lefkowitz 2007, pp. 264–265
  108. Levy 2007, p. 74
  109. Russell 2000, p. 73
  110. McCrady 1901, p. 89
  111. Landrum 1897, pp. 80–81
  112. Wilson 2005, p. 33
  113. Hibbert 2008, p. 106
  114. Bicheno 2014, pp. 154, 158
  115. Field 1898, p. 104
  116. Field 1898, pp. 114–118
  117. Field 1898, pp. 120–125
  118. Fischer, D. 2004, pp. 78–76
  119. Ketchum 2014 , p. 104
  120. Johnston 1897, p. 61
  121. Burke 1975, p. 134
  122. Baker 2014, Chap. 11
  123. ^ Baker 2014, Chap. 12
  124. CIA 2011, Historical Document
  125. Fischer, D. 2004, pp. 89, 381
  126. Adams 1963 , p. 657
  127. McCullough 2005, pp. 184–186
  128. McGuire 2011, pp. 165–166
  129. Fischer, D. 2004, pp. 102–107
  130. Fischer, D. 2004, pp. 102–111
  131. Ketchum 2014 , pp. 111, 130
  132. Fischer, D. 2004, pp. 109–125
  133. McCullough 2005, p. 122
  134. Lowenthal 2009, pp. 61, 131
  135. Tucker 2002, pp. 22–23
  136. Schecter 2003, pp. 266–267
  137. Fischer, D. 2004, pp. 138–142
  138. Morris, R.B. Morris 1983 (1965), p. 139
  139. McCullough 2005, p. 195
  140. Adams 1963 , pp. 650–670
  141. Schecter 2003, pp. 259–263
  142. Stryker, 1898, p. 122
  143. Fischer, 2006, pp. 248, 255
  144. Fischer, D. 2004, pp. 206–208, 254
  145. Wood 1995, pp. 72–74
  146. Mauch 2003, p. 416
  147. Fischer, D. 2004, p. 307
  148. McCullough 2005, p. 290
  149. Lengel 2005, p. 208
  150. Washington 1932, "Writings" v. 7, pp. 38, 130–131
  151. Washington 1932, "Writings" v. 7, pp. 131, 130
  152. Fischer, D. 2004, pp. 345–358
  153. Lecky 1891 Vol. 4, p. 57
  154. Ketchum 1997, pp. 79–80
  155. Ketchum 1997, pp. 81–82
  156. Ketchum 1997, p. 84
  157. Ketchum 1997, pp. 85–86
  158. Ketchum 1997, pp. 244–249
  159. Gabriel 2012, p. x
  160. Ketchum 1997, p. 332
  161. Ketchum 1997, pp. 337–339
  162. Ketchum 1997, pp. 368–369
  163. Ferling, 2007, pp. 238–239
  164. Ketchum 1997, pp. 421–424
  165. Stedman 1794, Vol. 1, pp. 317–319
  166. Adams 1911, p. 43
  167. Ward, C. 1952, pp. 361–362
  168. Taaffe 2003, pp. 95–100
  169. Daughan, 2011, pp. 148–155
  170. McGeorge, 1905, pp. 4–8
  171. Cadwalader 1901, p. 20
  172. Cadwalader 1901, p. 22
  173. Cadwalader 1901, pp. 22, 27
  174. Fiske 1891, p. 332
  175. Chernow 2010 (2011), pp. 327–328
  176. Lockhart 2008, p.?
  177. Risch, 1981, pp. 322, 417–418
  178. Ferling 2007, p. 117
  179. Jones 2002, pp. 5–6
  180. Ferling 2007, pp. 117–119
  181. ^ Chambers 1999
  182. Chambers 2004
  183. Eclov 2013 pp. 23–24
  184. Stockley 2001, pp. 11–14
  185. Renouf, Stephen. "Spain in the American Revolution" (PDF). Spain Society; SAR. sar.org. Archived (PDF) from the original on October 9, 2022. Retrieved December 7, 2020.
  186. Davenport 1917, pp. 145–146
  187. Davenport 1917, p. 146
  188. Weeks 2013, p. 27
  189. Chernow, 2010, p. 298
  190. Horn, 1989, pp. 24–25, 30
  191. Axelrod, 2009, pp. 234–235
  192. Edler 2001 , pp. 28–32
  193. Scott 1988, pp. 572–573
  194. Syrett 1998, p. 2
  195. Syrett 1998, pp. 18–19
  196. Ferling 2007, p. 294
  197. Syrett 1998, p. 17
  198. Syrett 1998, p. 18
  199. ^ Higginbotham 1983 , pp. 175–188
  200. Chernow 2010 (2011), p. 343
  201. Morrissey 2004, pp. 77–78
  202. Daughan 2011 , pp. 174–176
  203. Goos
  204. Hazard 1829, p. 54
  205. Nelson 1999, p. 170
  206. Bicheno 2014, p. 149
  207. Fischer, J. 2008, p. 86
  208. Soodalter, Ron (July 8, 2011). "Massacre & Retribution: The 1779-1780 Sullivan Expedition". History Net. Retrieved May 8, 2024.
  209. "The Clinton-Sullivan Campaign of 1779". National Park Service. Retrieved April 8, 2024.
  210. Tolson 2008, "Washington's Savvy Won the Day"
  211. Chandler 2017, pp. 363–380
  212. Fleming 2005 , pp. 174–175
  213. Fleming 2005 , pp. 232, 302
  214. Palmer 2010, pp. 340–342
  215. Palmer 2010, pp. 376–377
  216. Pearson 1993, pp. 16–19
  217. Wilson 2005, p. 87
  218. Morrill 1993, pp. 46–50
  219. ^ Wilson 2005, p. 112
  220. Pearson 1993, pp. 22–23
  221. Piecuch 2004, pp. 4–8
  222. Borick 2003, pp. 127–128
  223. Gordon and Keegan 2007, pp. 101–102
  224. Gordon and Keegan 2007, pp. 88–92
  225. Rankin 2011 , p.
  226. Buchanan 1997, p. 202
  227. Ferling, 2007, pp. 459–461
  228. Buchanan 1997, p. 275
  229. Golway 2005, pp. 238–242
  230. Peterson 1975 , pp. 234–238
  231. ^ Buchanan 1997, p. 241
  232. Greene, F. 1913, pp. 234–237
  233. Reynolds 2012, pp. 255–277
  234. Pancake 1985, p. 221
  235. Narrett 2015, p. 81
  236. Chavez 2002, p. 108
  237. Nester 2004, p. 194
  238. Harrison 2001, pp. 58–60
  239. Chávez 2002, p. 170
  240. Don Jaun Carlos I 1979, speech
  241. Deane 2018, "Spanish New Orleans helped America"
  242. Grenier 2005, p. 159
  243. Nelson 1999, p. 118
  244. Gaff 2004, p. 85
  245. Hogeland 2017, pp. 88–89
  246. Skaggs 1977, p. 132
  247. Raab 2007, p. 135
  248. O'Brien 2008, p. 124
  249. ^ Ferling 2007, p. 444
  250. Ketchum 2014b, pp. 423, 520
  251. Ketchum 2014b, p. 139
  252. Ferling 2007, pp. 526–529
  253. Grainger 2005, pp. 43–44
  254. Taylor 2016, pp. 293–295
  255. Dull 2015 , pp. 247–248
  256. Ketchum 2014b, p. 205
  257. Lengel 2005, p. 337
  258. Middleton 2014, pp. 29–43
  259. Black 1992, p. 110
  260. Dale 2005, pp. 36–37
  261. Ferling 2007, pp. 534–535
  262. Middleton 2014, pp. 370–372
  263. ^ Ferling 2003, pp. 378–379
  264. Fiske 1902, p. 516
  265. Ferling 2007, p. 553
  266. Armour 1941, p. 350
  267. Fleming 2006, p. 312
  268. USMA History Dept., Map: "American Revolution Principal Campaigns"
  269. Mays 2019, pp. 1–2
  270. ^ Mays 2019, pp. 2–3
  271. Davenport 1917, p. 168
  272. Scott 1988, pp. 572–573
  273. ^ Greene & Pole 2008, pp. 36–39
  274. ^ Black 2001 , p. 59
  275. ^ Ferling 2007, pp. 286–287
  276. ^ Higginbotham 1987, Chap. 3
  277. Miller 1997, pp. 11–12, 16
  278. ^ Smith, D. 2012, pp. iv, 459
  279. Lengel 2005, pp. 365–371
  280. Ellis 2004, pp. 92–109
  281. Rose, A. 2014 , pp. 258–261
  282. Boatner 1974, p. 264
  283. Duffy 2005 , p. 13
  284. Crocker 2006, p. 51
  285. Ferling 2007, pp. 294–295
  286. Jillson and Wilson, 1994, p. 77
  287. Chernow, 2010, p. 344
  288. Carp 1990, p. 220
  289. Freeman and Harwell (ed.), p. 42
  290. Bell 2005, pp. 3–4"
  291. Ferling 2007, p. 360
  292. Miller 1997 , pp. 11–12, 16
  293. Higginbotham 1987 , pp. 331–346
  294. Higginbotham 1983 , pp. 331–346
  295. Thomas 2017, "Last Naval Battle"
  296. Daughan 2011 , p. 240
  297. ^ , "Privateers"
  298. Philbrick 2016, p. 237
  299. Trevelyan 1912a, p. 249
  300. Morgan 2012 , pp. 82–83
  301. Ketchum 1997, p. 447
  302. Ketchum 1997, pp. 405–448
  303. Davis 1975, pp. 203, 303, 391
  304. Higginbotham 1983 , pp. 188–198
  305. Cave 2004, pp. 21–22
  306. Greene & Pole 2008, pp. 298, 306
  307. Rossman 2016, p. 2
  308. Curtis 1926, pp. 148–149
  309. Greene & Pole 2008, pp. 42, 48
  310. Syrett 1998, pp. 18–22
  311. Hibbert 2008, p. 333
  312. Davis, L. and Engerman 2006, p. 64
  313. Rappleye 2010, pp. 300–313
  314. Curtis 1926, p. 148
  315. Ferling 2007, pp. 562–577
  316. Ellis 2013, p. xi
  317. Stewart, R. 2005, vol. 4, p. 103
  318. Clode 1869, Vol. 1, p. 268
  319. Billias 1969, p. 83
  320. Clayton 2014, p. 65
  321. O'Shaunessy 2013, p. 86
  322. Ketchum 1997, p. 76
  323. Ketchum 2014a, p. 208
  324. Miller 1959, pp. 410–412
  325. Fleming 2006, p. 44
  326. Davies, K. 1972, vol. 12 – 1776, 5:93, Howe to Germain, June 7 and July 7, 1776
  327. ^ O'Shaunessy 2013, p. 216
  328. Hibbert 2000, pp. 160–161
  329. O'Shaunessy 2013, p.
  330. Davies, K. 1972, vol. 15 – 1778, 5:96, Clinton to Germain, September 15, 1778
  331. Ketchum 2014b, pp. 208–210
  332. Cashin 2005, "Revolutionary War in Georgia"
  333. Baer 2015, p. 115
  334. Baer 2015, p. 117
  335. Showalter 2007, "Best armies money could buy"
  336. Baer 2015, pp. 111–112
  337. Fetter 1980, p. 508
  338. Baer 2015, pp. 118–119
  339. ^ Schmidt 1958, pp. 208–209
  340. Baer 2015, pp. 121, 141–142
  341. Baer 2015, pp. 143–144
  342. Baer 2015, pp. 136–143
  343. O'Saughnessy, 2004, p. 20
  344. Baer 2015, p. 142
  345. Mauch 2003, p. 415
  346. Atwood, 2002, p. 194
  347. Lowell 1884, pp. 20–21, 282–283
  348. Ritcheson 1973, p. 6
  349. Black 2001 , p. 12
  350. Black 2001 , pp. 13–14
  351. Black 2001 , p. 14
  352. Black 2001 , pp. 14–16 , 35, 38
  353. Calhoon 1973, p.
  354. Buchanan 1997, p. 327
  355. Bass 1957, pp. 548–550
  356. Chernow, 2010, p. 215
  357. Dunkerly 2014, "Camp Followers"
  358. Howat 2017, "Women Spies"
  359. ^ Historical Essay 2009
  360. Hunt 2015, pp. 188–222
  361. Hunt, Paula D. (June 2015). "Sybil Ludington, the Female Paul Revere: The Making of a Revolutionary War Heroine". The New England Quarterly. 88 (2): 187–222. doi:10.1162/TNEQ_a_00452. ISSN 0028-4866. S2CID 57569643.
  362. Tucker, Abigail (March 2022). "Did the Midnight Ride of Sibyl Ludington Ever Happen?". Smithsonian. Retrieved July 6, 2022.
  363. Lewis, Jone Johnson (August 15, 2019). "Sybil Ludington, Possible Female Paul Revere". ThoughtCo. Retrieved July 6, 2022.
  364. Eschner, Kat (April 26, 2017). "Was There Really a Teenage, Female Paul Revere?". Smithsonian. Retrieved July 6, 2022.
  365. Nash 2012, p. 251
  366. Nash, 2005, pp. 167–168
  367. Canada' Digital Collections "Black Loyalists"
  368. ^ Bibko, 2016, pp. 68–69
  369. Bibko, 2016, p. 59
  370. Kolchin 1994, p. 73
  371. Lanning 2012, p. 75
  372. Alexander 2010, p. 356
  373. Bibko, 2016, p. 61
  374. Finger 2001, pp. 43–64
  375. Ward, H. 1999, p. 198
  376. O'Brien 2008, pp. 123–126
  377. Ferling 2007, pp. 200–203
  378. Reid, D. 2017, p.
  379. ^ Carroll 2001, p. 24
  380. Ferling 2007, pp. 354–355
  381. Morris, R.B. Morris 1983 , pp. 435–436
  382. Whiteley 1996, p. 175
  383. Namier and Brooke 1985, p. 246
  384. Ward and Prothero 1925, p. 458
  385. Black 2011, pp. 117–118
  386. Harvey 2004, pp. 531–532
  387. ^ Cogliano 2003, p. 85
  388. Morris, 1983 , pp. 221–323, 331–333
  389. Dull 1987 , pp. 144–151
  390. Morris, 1983 , pp. 218–221
  391. Kaplan, L. 1983, "Treaty of Paris"
  392. Ketchum 2014b, p. 287
  393. ^ Herring 2011 , p. 41
  394. Benn 1993, p. 17
  395. Herring 2011 , p. 45
  396. Herring 2011 , p. 46
  397. Ellis 2004, p. 87
  398. Peckham 1974, p.
  399. Burrows 2008b, p.
  400. Chambers 1999 p. 849
  401. ^ Dawson 2017, "Frenchmen who died"
  402. ^ White 2010, "Essay"
  403. Burke 1785, p.
  404. Inman 1903, pp. 203–205
  405. Debret 1781, p. 269
  406. NIH GARD 2016, "Scurvy"
  407. Vale 2013, p. 160
  408. Conway 1995, p. 191
  409. McDonald, Forrest. Novus Ordo Seclorum: The Intellectual Origins of the Constitution, pp. 6–7, Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 1985. ISBN 0700602844.
  410. Bailyn, 2007, pp. 35, 134–149
  411. Morgan, 2012 , pp. 96–97
  412. Morgan, 2012 , p. 97
  413. Wood, 1992, pp. 3–8, 186–187
  414. Paul David Nelson, "British Conduct of the American Revolutionary War: A Review of Interpretations." Journal of American History 65.3 (1978): 623–653. JSTOR 1901416
  415. See David Lundberg and Henry F. May, "The Enlightened Reader in America", American Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 2 (1976): 267.
  416. Tyrrell, Ian (1999). "Making Nations/Making States: American Historians in the Context of Empire". Journal of American History. 86 (3): 1015–1044. doi:10.2307/2568604. ISSN 0021-8723. JSTOR 2568604.
  417. Robin Winks, ed. Historiography (1999) 5:95
  418. Cogliano, Francis D. (2010). "Revisiting the American Revolution". History Compass. 8 (8): 951–963. doi:10.1111/j.1478-0542.2010.00705.x.
  419. Eliga H. Gould, Peter S. Onuf, eds. Empire and Nation: The American Revolution in the Atlantic World (2005)
  420. Gould, Eliga H. (1999). "A virtual nation: Greater Britain and the imperial legacy of the American Revolution". American Historical Review. 104 (2): 476–489. doi:10.2307/2650376. JSTOR 2650376.
  421. David Kennedy; Lizabeth Cohen (2015). American Pageant. Cengage Learning. p. 156. ISBN 978-1305537422.
  422. Ellen Holmes Pearson. "Revising Custom, Embracing Choice: Early American Legal Scholars and the Republicanization of the Common Law", in Gould and Onuf, eds. Empire and Nation: The American Revolution in the Atlantic World (2005) pp. 93–113
  423. Anton-Hermann Chroust, Rise of the Legal Profession in America (1965) vol. 2.
  424. Houseman; Kloetzel (2019). Scott Specialized Catalogue of United States Stamps and Covers. Amos Media Company. ISBN 978-0894875595. Stamps listed in chronological order

Bibliography

Main article: Bibliography of the American Revolutionary War

Further reading

Main articles: Bibliography of the American Revolutionary War and Bibliography of George Washington

External links

Listen to this article (6 minutes)
Spoken Misplaced Pages iconThis audio file was created from a revision of this article dated 16 October 2022 (2022-10-16), and does not reflect subsequent edits.(Audio help · More spoken articles)
American Revolutionary War
Origins of the American Revolution
Philosophy
Royalists
Related British
Acts of Parliament
Colonials
Events
  • Combatants
  • Campaigns
  • Theaters
  • Battles
  • Events
  • Colonies
Combatants
United Colonies/Thirteen Colonies
Kingdom of Great Britain
Colonial allies
Campaigns and
theaters
Major battles
Other events
Related conflicts
Involvement (by 
colony or location)
Rebel colonies
Loyal colonies
Leaders
British
Military
Civilian
Colonial
Military
Civilian
Colonial allies
French
Aftermath
  • Related topics
Military
Political
Other topics
The Continental Army of the American Revolutionary War
Departments
Units
By state
By year
Extra
Other
Events
Manual
Related
Armed conflicts involving the Armed Forces of the United States
Listed chronologically
Domestic
Foreign
Related
Colonial conflicts involving the English/British Empire
17th
century
18th
century
19th
century
20th
century
History of the United States
Events
Pre-Colonial
Colonial
1776–1789
1789–1815
1815–1849
1849–1865
1865–1917
1917–1945
1945–1964
1964–1980
1980–1991
1991–2008
2008–present
Topics
Groups
Places
Territorial evolution
Regions
States
Federal DistrictWashington, D.C.
Insular areas
Outlying islands
Cities
United States articles
History
By period
By event
By topic
Geography
Politics
Federal
Executive
Legislative
Judicial
Law
Uniformed
State,
Federal District,
and Territorial
Executive
Legislative
Judicial
Law
Tribal
Local
County
Cities
Minor divisions
Special district
Economy
Transport
Society
Culture
Social class
Health
Issues
Portals: Categories: