Misplaced Pages

Talk:Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 21:28, 13 December 2018 editAhrtoodeetoo (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users4,519 edits Jim Comey's comments about Matthew Whitaker: new section← Previous edit Latest revision as of 00:22, 5 January 2025 edit undoMuboshgu (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators376,756 edits Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2024 
(83 intermediate revisions by 48 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{afd-merged-from|One people under one God|One people under one God|20 October 2018}}
{{Skip to talk}} {{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header}} {{Talk header}}
{{American politics AE}}
{{American English}} {{American English}}
{{afd-merged-from|One people under one God|One people under one God|20 October 2018}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|blp=yes|class=B|1=
{{WikiProject 2010s|importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject Conservatism|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums}}
{{WikiProject Politics|importance=Low|American=Yes|American-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid|USPE=Yes|USPE-importance=mid}}
{{WikiProject United States Presidents |importance=top |trump=yes |trump-importance=top}}
}}
{{Copied|from=Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016|from_oldid=705229724|to=Political positions of Donald Trump|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Political_positions_of_Donald_Trump&oldid=705229642}} {{Copied|from=Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016|from_oldid=705229724|to=Political positions of Donald Trump|diff=https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Political_positions_of_Donald_Trump&oldid=705229642}}
{{American politics AE|1RR=no|Consensus required=no|BRD=yes}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1=

{{WikiProject Conservatism|class=C|importance=Low}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
{{WikiProject Donald Trump|class=C|importance=top}}
| algo = old(365d)
{{WikiProject Elections and Referendums|class=C}}
| archive = Talk:Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign/Archive %(counter)d
{{WikiProject Politics|class=C|importance=Low|American=Yes|American-importance=Low}}
| counter = 13
{{WikiProject United States|class=C|importance=Low|USPE=Yes|USPE-importance=mid}}
| maxarchivesize = 150K
| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minthreadstoarchive = 1
| minthreadsleft = 1
}} }}
{{Section sizes}}
{{Spoken Misplaced Pages request|Lionsdude148|Important}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Misplaced Pages:Wiki_Ed/Hunter_College_CUNY/AFPRL_29026_Intro_to_Hip_Hop_Culture_and_History_(Fall_2016) | assignments = ] }}
{{Auto archiving notice|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=2 |units=weeks}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| archiveheader = {{Tan}}
| maxarchivesize = 100K
| counter = 13
| algo = old(14d)
| archive = Talk:Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016/Archive %(counter)d
}}
{{Annual readership}}


== Shift focus to neutrality ==
== Semi-protected edit request ==


Requester suggests the article author used bias. Critic, criticism or criticized words are used 92 times. Suggests a shift of focus from opinion to fact, with less speech quotes, which will be more appropriate for an encyclopedia.
{{edit semi-protected|Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016|answered=yes}}
I'd like to make an addition to the sentence "Trump was supported by other right-wing and far-right leaders in various countries, including Austria, Germany, Serbia, the Czech Republic, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Italy." to read "Trump was supported by other right-wing and far-right leaders in various countries, including Austria, Germany, Serbia, the Czech Republic, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Italy '''as well as the former Estonian PM and ex-chairman of the centre-left ]'''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.postimees.ee/3778961/savisaar-toetaks-usa-presidendina-donald-trumpi|title=Savisaar toetaks USA presidendina Donald Trumpi - Eesti uudised - Postimees.ee|work=postimees.ee|accessdate=October 1, 2016}}</ref>".


== Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2024 ==
I think it would be important to mention this as its shows that Trump was endorsed by some centrist and centre-left figures as well.--] (]) 12:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
:] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:ESp --> See ] for why this is unnecessary and, ultimately, inaccurate. National presidential candidates are expected to attract centrist endorsements. ] ] ] 17:44, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
{{reflist-talk}}


{{Edit semi-protected|Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign|answered=yes}}
== Second Amendment Comment
Please change the date where he is recorded as being declared the presumptive nominee to May 3, 2016.


Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/2016_Indiana_Republican_presidential_primary
This page indicates that Trump's statement that Clinton wanted to abolish the second amendment is 'factually false'. While it was not strictly true, people are removing my comment that many people consider it to bear a degree of truth. Clinton expressed opposition to modern supreme court second amendment jurisprudence, which has thus far only affirmed mainstream understanding that the second amendment protects an individual right to firearm ownership. Overturning those decisions would indeed in effect 'abolish' the meaning of the amendment. Again, Clinton never expressly desired to repeal the amendment, but to say that such notion is false without any context is misleading to this page's readers. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 15:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


Also, if you look up “Trump may 3 2016,” you’ll see portraits of Trump at an election night event in Manhattan with his family members, giving a speech. ] (]) 22:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
== External links modified ==
:{{done}}<!-- Template:ESp --> This was already verified by citations in the ]. Thanks. ] (]) 23:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


== Cambridge Analytics ==
Hello fellow Wikipedians,


''In addition, UK big data voter opinion influencer Cambridge Analytics was hired by the Trump campaign in 2016. '''In March 2018, it was revealed through undercover footage that Cambridge Analytica used seductive women to entice a rival candidate while secretly videotaping the encounter. The firm also sent impostors who acted like wealthy individuals only to give them bribes.'''''
I have just modified 2 external links on ]. Please take a moment to review . If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit ] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20170508054010/https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-statement-on-preventing-muslim-immigration to https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-statement-on-preventing-muslim-immigration
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160126043513/http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2016/01/national_black_republican_association_endorses_donald_trump_for_president.html to http://www.theroot.com/articles/news/2016/01/national_black_republican_association_endorses_donald_trump_for_president.html
*Added {{tlx|dead link}} tag to https://doc-0o-9c-apps-viewer.googleusercontent.com/viewer/secure/pdf/geq08fjtiu763j6vtr723u92e9078vhf/2louikq3b51elh62a6gnj96guimfk4h0/1470787800000/lantern/00790276663516429489/ACFrOgBIelx2TwOYb7vnpwRsoN-ZVKaBLN48hX6ZtykvjO46cpvcKUxxy6wHeEZKC0nkmIzRnHe6kCE8fZxoA-_sIPqXV7UKCp42aZY26EGTpNf2ws3osR5jujTttP8%3D?print=true&nonce=4npi5it39mh3k&user=00790276663516429489&hash=psrhn2p9t3fivsl2b9pci15oh7o565jv


This section should be removed or at least heavily reworded. An ''unrelated'' controversy with a consultancy firm shouldn't be in the ''Branding'' subsection of an article about a presidential campaign. Not every controversy with every consultancy firm hired by a campaign is noteworthy.
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.


In addition- that's comparatively minor for the firm and was not widely reported on. There are actually much more relevant controversies. Possible campaign finance law violations and how the firm acquired Facebook data used in the campaign. ] (]) 05:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}


== Full edit summary ==
Cheers.—] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">(])</span> 18:58, 12 September 2017 (UTC)


I tried to provide a long edit summary for my recent (and possibly controversial) removal of a sentence about Trump's support among minority Republicans, but it got cut off around 3/4 through. As such, I thought I'd provide the full summary here:
== Second Amendment Comment ==
{{quote|Removed sentence "Trump had a persistently high popularity among Republican and leaning-Republican minority voters". None of the four cited sources explicitly or even somewhat back up this claim. One source is a poll that shows Clinton leading among minority voters, but doesn't specify the views of minority Republicans specifically. Another is about the National Black Republican Association endorsing Trump. The third is about a group of black pastors endorsing Trump, while the fourth has a Trump advisor talking about how much Hispanics love him, but then notes that "One national poll this fall had Mr. Trump’s unfavorability among Hispanics at a death-rattling 82 percent." Together, none of these citations support the stated claim.}} ] (]) 14:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#Support for President Donald Trump by white Americans}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 20:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#Trump campaign controversies}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 20:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)
== "]" listed at ] ==
]
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24#TrumPAC}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 20:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)


== Trump' campaign announcement deserves its own article ==


I know not everything deserves its own article, however; I believe with how iconic his announcement was with coming down the escalator in Trump Tower, as well as his speech, and how that was the springboard for essentially a whole new era in America, it definitely deserves its own article. ] (]) 00:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
This page indicates that Trump's statement that Clinton wanted to abolish the second amendment is 'factually false'. While it was not strictly true, people are removing my comment that many people consider it to bear a degree of accuracy. Clinton expressed opposition to modern supreme court second amendment jurisprudence, which has thus far only affirmed mainstream understanding that the second amendment protects an individual right to firearm ownership. Overturning those decisions would indeed in effect 'abolish' the meaning of the amendment. Again, Clinton never expressly desired to repeal the amendment, but to say that such notion is false without any context is misleading to this page's readers. Reputable sources, (National Review, Federalist), have stood by the comment.


:I {{u|That Coptic Guy}} left on your talk page. You didn't listen. That's unfortunate. This is getting disruptive. &ndash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;(]) 00:46, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
== Citation error ==
::Agree with what you've said regarding his editing habits; however, on this one I think he has a good point. Trump's 2015 campaign announcement has received plenty of coverage independent of his campaign itself, and over a long period of time: I believe it meets ] and is worthy of discussion as a standalone article. ] (]) 02:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)


== Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2024 ==
Citation 768 is not working ] (]) 00:58, 1 November 2017 (UTC)


{{edit semi-protected|Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign|answered=yes}}
== Russian collusion / interference ==
For the "Praise for authoritarian foreign leaders", I would consider adding this about Assad:


Trump has praised ] ] multiple times. During the ], Trump stated that he didn't like Assad, but also praised him, ], and ] for their fight against ISIS.<ref>https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-praise-russia-iran-assad-criticism-229546</ref> The ] condemned Trump, calling him a "liar".<ref>https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-assad-isis-debate-2016-10</ref> In the October 16 debate, he stated that Assad is "much tougher and much smarter" than Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.<ref>https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-assad-tougher-and-smarter-than-obama-and-clinton-2016-10</ref> ] (]) 19:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
The content on this issue is all in the lede. None of it is in the body of this article. ]] '''<span style="border:2px solid black">]</span>''' 01:17, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
:{{partly done}} We try to avoid using Business Insider as a source for political content due to concerns about quality/reliability, but I've added the first sentence with the Politico citation. ] (]) 22:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

{{reflist-talk}}
:: I have added a paragraph to the body of the article (and restored the content in the lead, with some updated sourcing, now that it is in the body). ]<sup>]</sup> 14:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)

==Former chairman of the campaign Paul Manafort==

The former chairman of this campaign, Paul Manafort, is currently in jail and on trial for conspiracy against the United States, being an agent of a foreign country, false statements and fraud. Oddly enough it isn't even mentioned in the article, despite being one of the most notable characteristics of this campaign, in terms of how much coverage in reliable sources it has received. --] (]) 21:28, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
:Why should it be in here? As his article says {{tq|None of the charges that have been brought against Manafort are related to Russian interference in the 2016 election}}. -- ] (]) 21:31, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
::Um, the ''chairman'' of this entity is in prison for conspiracy against the United States. A campaign which btw. had "lock her up" as its campaign slogan. I fail to see how that's not relevant from a neutral and encyclopedic perspective. This isn't just about Russian interference in the 2016 election either. --] (]) 23:25, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
:::This article is not about the chairman of the campaign, that article is at ]. "lock her up" is not listed as one of the slogans in the article, and even still it is not really relevant as Manafort is a man. You have failed to demonstrate how this is relevant from a neutral or encyclopedic perspective. ] (]) 17:28, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
::::Partisan views is not a reason to omit this material and you have failed to demonstrate why it's not relevant in this article that its chairman is in jail for conspiracy against the United States, especially considering that a major focus of this entity (campaign) was the alleged crimes of its opponent. --] (]) 07:16, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
:::::I have not said anything about partisan view. The ] is on you to prove that something is relevant. Crimes, alleged or otherwise, of an opponent doesn't mean we should include charges on Manafort unless it is related. This is an encyclopedia not a newspaper. ] (]) 19:49, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
:::::Please read sources. Manafort's indictments are totally unrelated to his election work for Trump. — ] <sup>]</sup> 10:33, 7 August 2018 (UTC)

The Trump campaign made changes to the GOP platform about Ukraine in support of Putin's wishes. Manafort worked for the pro-Russian Ukraine President, all for the purpose of promoting Putin's wishes in Ukraine, and Manafort brought that work with him into the Trump campaign, and the campaign adopted Manafort's lobby work (for which he was richly rewarded, and for which he is now on trial) as part of its appeasement work with Putin, in return for which Putin allegedly promised to help Trump win, and for which Rosneft/Ukraine promises were allegedly made, with a share of the sale of Rosneft allegedly promised to Trump if he would lift the sanctions, which were tied to Ukraine and the Magnitsky Act sanctions. One of his first acts as president was to attempt to lift those sanctions, the lifting of which was also the subject of the Trump Tower meeting.

The proven help which then came from Russia to interfere in the election for Trump is all tied together, so this content is very relevant. We have a number of good articles here on these subjects, with many RS which document this series of events and ties between Russians, Ukraine, and Putin/Russia. -- ] (]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 11:30, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
:] you know better. We do not need random conspiracy theories here that are unrelated to the subject. ] (]) 18:13, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
:: Here's one difference between us. What I've written is straight from our articles and (there) backed by RS. You don't seem to be aware of what RS say, and call this narrative "random conspiracy theories". What I wrote is in direct answer to the subject being discussed. By explaining how all this is related to the subject of this article, I help editors to understand what is relevant to keep, and what is not. That's not FORUM, but doing what we're supposed to do on a talk page. That you don't see it that way doesn't give you license to force your opinion by hatting my very serious explanation of events and alleged connections, all based on RS. I don't write my own suppositions. One editor's narrative based on RS is another editor's "random conspiracy theories". We base our content on RS, and I base my opinions on RS. -- ] (]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 18:28, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
:::No, you are expounding your own OR and fringe conspiracy theories that are not related to the section being discussed. ] (]) 18:34, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
:::: ] -- ] (]) <u><small>'''''PingMe'''''</small></u> 19:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Mueller's team says there is a Trump campaign connection to the bank fraud case, according to . This might warrant a mention in this article. <em><sup>]</sup><sub>]</sub></em> 22:42, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
:That is actually an interesting article. A little bit of a stretch though. Basically a senior executive at a bank gave an override on a bank loan to get an advisor position on the campaign and hoped, but did not get, a position in the administration. ] (]) 13:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)


== Should Trump's 2015 announcement get its own article? ==
== Jim Comey's comments about Matthew Whitaker ==


I argued this above but wanted to make it a standalone post. Trump's campaign announcement is unique compared to other campaign announcements for the lasting coverage it received: It meets ], imo. ] (]) 22:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
You are invited to participate in ]. ] <small>(])</small> 21:28, 13 December 2018 (UTC)
: I don't think his campaign announcement is independently notable from the campaign itself. What more needs to be said outside of that three-paragraph section? &ndash;&nbsp;]&nbsp;(]) 00:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 00:22, 5 January 2025

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13Auto-archiving period: 12 months 
This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
One people under one God was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 20 October 2018 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject icon2010s Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject 2010s, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of 2010s on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.2010sWikipedia:WikiProject 2010sTemplate:WikiProject 2010s2010s
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
WikiProject iconConservatism Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconElections and Referendums
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums
WikiProject iconPolitics: American Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconUnited States: Presidential elections Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. presidential elections (assessed as Mid-importance).
WikiProject iconUnited States Presidents: Donald Trump Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States Presidents, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of United States Presidents on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States PresidentsWikipedia:WikiProject United States PresidentsTemplate:WikiProject United States PresidentsUnited States Presidents
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Donald Trump task force.
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Donald Trump presidential campaign, 2016 was copied or moved into Political positions of Donald Trump with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must follow the bold-revert-discuss cycle if your change is reverted. You may not reinstate your edit until you post a talk page message discussing your edit and have waited 24 hours from the time of this talk page message

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information
Enforcement procedures:
  • Violations of any of these restrictions should be reported immediately to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard.
  • Editors who are aware of this topic being designated a contentious topic and who violate these restrictions may be sanctioned by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offense.

The contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topics sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. Remember: When in doubt, don't revert!

Section sizes
Section size for Donald Trump 2016 presidential campaign (68 sections)
Section name Byte
count
Section
total
(Top) 28,924 28,924
Background 11,557 11,557
Announcement 13,620 13,620
Early campaign 7,905 27,910
Border wall and illegal immigration 10,318 10,318
Temporary Muslim ban proposal 9,687 9,687
Primary front-runner 7,391 7,391
Caucuses and primaries 7,185 7,185
Rallies and crowds 4,994 12,544
Violence, protests and expulsions 7,550 7,550
Presumptive nominee and party reaction 6,571 6,571
General election campaign staff 8,120 8,120
Selection of running mate 4,016 4,016
Presidential debates 2,848 2,848
Endorsements 6,283 6,283
Results 5,805 5,805
Post-election 2,578 2,578
Russian interference in the 2016 election 8,792 8,792
Political positions 2,337 12,816
Opposition to trade agreements 10,479 10,479
Campaign branding 5,169 9,863
Ground game 1,273 1,273
Music 3,421 3,421
Media coverage 12,830 12,830
Relationships with people and groups 84 99,193
Black communities 3,073 3,073
Business community 4,282 4,282
Conservative movement 19,166 36,910
Stop Trump movement 5,902 5,902
Mitt Romney 4,277 4,277
Paul Ryan 7,565 7,565
Economists 2,166 2,166
Fox News and Megyn Kelly 5,140 5,140
Hispanic and Latino Americans 6,551 6,551
Military 1,510 1,510
Religious community 9,128 9,128
Tea Party movement 1,047 1,047
Trump family 2,802 2,802
Wikileaks 7,338 7,338
Women 5,894 5,894
White nationalists and white supremacists 9,624 9,624
r/The_Donald subreddit 3,644 3,644
Supporter demographics 4,406 4,406
Campaign finances 25 15,253
Primary campaign 7,869 7,869
General election campaign 7,359 7,359
Controversies 251 78,114
Comment about the Second Amendment and Hillary Clinton 5,659 5,659
Khizr and Ghazala Khan 6,193 6,193
Campaign misstatements 2,486 2,486
Praise for authoritarian foreign leaders 10,151 10,151
Support for fringe or conspiracy theories 3,134 3,134
Refusal to release tax returns 3,496 3,496
Use of Twitter 6,890 6,890
Opposition from Republicans 8,145 8,145
Trump University 9,328 9,328
2005 Access Hollywood video tape 8,278 8,278
Sexual misconduct accusations 4,810 4,810
Uncertainty over accepting the election results 5,945 5,945
Allegations of promoting voter intimidation 3,348 3,348
Reactions 17 8,899
Domestic reactions 1,065 1,065
World leaders 4,369 4,369
Foreign politicians 2,097 2,097
Protests 1,351 1,351
Notes 26 26
References 35 35
External links 2,072 2,072
Total 397,651 397,651

Shift focus to neutrality

Requester suggests the article author used bias. Critic, criticism or criticized words are used 92 times. Suggests a shift of focus from opinion to fact, with less speech quotes, which will be more appropriate for an encyclopedia.

Semi-protected edit request on 5 March 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Please change the date where he is recorded as being declared the presumptive nominee to May 3, 2016.

Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/2016_Indiana_Republican_presidential_primary

Also, if you look up “Trump may 3 2016,” you’ll see portraits of Trump at an election night event in Manhattan with his family members, giving a speech. 2604:2D80:7A87:EA00:F8A3:496F:CDD4:490 (talk) 22:41, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done This was already verified by citations in the article. Thanks. Jamedeus (talk) 23:00, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Cambridge Analytics

In addition, UK big data voter opinion influencer Cambridge Analytics was hired by the Trump campaign in 2016. In March 2018, it was revealed through undercover footage that Cambridge Analytica used seductive women to entice a rival candidate while secretly videotaping the encounter. The firm also sent impostors who acted like wealthy individuals only to give them bribes.

This section should be removed or at least heavily reworded. An unrelated controversy with a consultancy firm shouldn't be in the Branding subsection of an article about a presidential campaign. Not every controversy with every consultancy firm hired by a campaign is noteworthy.

In addition- that's comparatively minor for the firm and was not widely reported on. There are actually much more relevant controversies. Possible campaign finance law violations and how the firm acquired Facebook data used in the campaign. ArguedOyster (talk) 05:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)

Full edit summary

I tried to provide a long edit summary for my recent (and possibly controversial) removal of a sentence about Trump's support among minority Republicans, but it got cut off around 3/4 through. As such, I thought I'd provide the full summary here:

Removed sentence "Trump had a persistently high popularity among Republican and leaning-Republican minority voters". None of the four cited sources explicitly or even somewhat back up this claim. One source is a poll that shows Clinton leading among minority voters, but doesn't specify the views of minority Republicans specifically. Another is about the National Black Republican Association endorsing Trump. The third is about a group of black pastors endorsing Trump, while the fourth has a Trump advisor talking about how much Hispanics love him, but then notes that "One national poll this fall had Mr. Trump’s unfavorability among Hispanics at a death-rattling 82 percent." Together, none of these citations support the stated claim.

Loytra (talk) 14:24, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

"Support for President Donald Trump by white Americans" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Support for President Donald Trump by white Americans has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24 § Support for President Donald Trump by white Americans until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:20, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

"Trump campaign controversies" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Trump campaign controversies has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24 § Trump campaign controversies until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:39, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

"TrumPAC" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect TrumPAC has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 24 § TrumPAC until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 20:49, 24 July 2024 (UTC)

Trump' campaign announcement deserves its own article

I know not everything deserves its own article, however; I believe with how iconic his announcement was with coming down the escalator in Trump Tower, as well as his speech, and how that was the springboard for essentially a whole new era in America, it definitely deserves its own article. Vinnylospo (talk) 00:42, 5 August 2024 (UTC)

I saw the note That Coptic Guy left on your talk page. You didn't listen. That's unfortunate. This is getting disruptive. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:46, 5 August 2024 (UTC)
Agree with what you've said regarding his editing habits; however, on this one I think he has a good point. Trump's 2015 campaign announcement has received plenty of coverage independent of his campaign itself, and over a long period of time: I believe it meets WP:GNG and is worthy of discussion as a standalone article. Dingers5Days (talk) 02:04, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 26 October 2024

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

For the "Praise for authoritarian foreign leaders", I would consider adding this about Assad:

Trump has praised Syrian President Bashar al-Assad multiple times. During the October 9 debate, Trump stated that he didn't like Assad, but also praised him, Russia, and Iran for their fight against ISIS. The Raqqa Is Being Slaughtered Silently condemned Trump, calling him a "liar". In the October 16 debate, he stated that Assad is "much tougher and much smarter" than Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton. 217.180.201.178 (talk) 19:12, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

 Partly done We try to avoid using Business Insider as a source for political content due to concerns about quality/reliability, but I've added the first sentence with the Politico citation. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 22:35, 26 October 2024 (UTC)

References

  1. https://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/trump-praise-russia-iran-assad-criticism-229546
  2. https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-assad-isis-debate-2016-10
  3. https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-assad-tougher-and-smarter-than-obama-and-clinton-2016-10

Should Trump's 2015 announcement get its own article?

I argued this above but wanted to make it a standalone post. Trump's campaign announcement is unique compared to other campaign announcements for the lasting coverage it received: It meets WP:SIGCOV, imo. Dingers5Days (talk) 22:54, 4 January 2025 (UTC)

I don't think his campaign announcement is independently notable from the campaign itself. What more needs to be said outside of that three-paragraph section? – Muboshgu (talk) 00:22, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: