| Revision as of 17:38, 4 August 2010 editRick jens (talk | contribs)223 edits →Lot of POVs in first paragraph← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 06:51, 5 January 2025 edit undoRavensfire (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers88,947 editsm rv sockTag: Rollback |
| (751 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{WP India |
|
|
|
{{Indian English}} |
|
|class= |
|
|
|
{{Contentious topics/talk notice|ipa}} |
|
|importance= |
|
| ⚫ |
}} |
|
|
{{oldafdfull |
|
{{oldafdfull |
|
| date = February 20, 2007 |
|
| date = February 20, 2007 |
|
| result = '''keep''' |
|
| result = '''keep''' |
|
| votepage = Popular Front of India |
|
| votepage = Popular Front of India |
|
⚫ |
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|class=C| |
|
|
{{WikiProject India|importance=low|politics=yes|politics-importance=mid|assess-date=May 2012}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Islam|importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Discrimination |importance=High}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Organizations|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{Talk archive}} |
|
|
|algo = old(365d) |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 50K |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 5 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|counter = 4 |
|
|
|archive = Talk:Popular Front of India/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 June 2024 == |
|
== |
|
|
''' |
|
|
Reference Number 18,19 are referred from Malayalam Regional sites,so as an english wiki please remove the lines with that reference.so in that case "Connection with other terror networks" has no evidence.So in my opinion it should remove. (Achu 14:10, 2 August 2010 (UTC))''' |
|
|
|
|
|
Popupar front is not a political party. It has a political strategy for supporting the down-trodden in the society, but not a political organisation. It is just a confederation of different like minded organisations. ] 12:39, 21 January 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
I dont know what is a neutrality issue here. Need to remove the tag.] 07:34, 5 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Many events are listed here. I feel that a brief detail of each event can be given, either in the same page or a separate page. If not proper references can be put for each events. |
|
|
|
|
|
popular front do not have any link with terrorist organizations in india or abroad ,here given reference was fake and non-existent so as an encyclopedia that fake information should not come in this page,so i removed the fake link --] (]) 11:10, 23 April 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Initial level of formatting and wikifying is done == |
|
|
|
|
|
The page has originally contained un-wikified article. Now I have edited page and cleaned all the WOI and POV. Please remove the tag for deletion ] 11:30, 23 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
* Removed the deletion tag. It is found that ], ] has added this tag, not the administrators. ] 04:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Tag AfD is no more valid == |
|
|
The arguments that are raised by ] at ] |
|
|
is no more exisits.] 05:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Fair use rationale for Image:Pfi.jpg== |
|
|
] |
|
|
''']''' is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under ] but there is no ] as to why its use in '''this''' Misplaced Pages article constitutes fair use. In addition to the ], you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with ]. |
|
|
|
|
|
Please go to ] and edit it to include a ]. Using one of the templates at ] is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Misplaced Pages policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. |
|
|
|
|
|
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on ]. If you have any questions please ask them at the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Missing rationale2 --> |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 20:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Rewrite needed == |
|
|
|
|
|
The prose and the balance of this article are both lacking. I'm going to be rewriting several sections across the next few days. -- ] (]) 14:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Copy and paste of propaganda materials and its circulation need to be done in radical websites not in wikipedia. ] (]) 15:45, 2 August 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Article needs lock == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This article needs to be locked, as the matter has repeatedly been twisted by some editors copying some propaganda materials. |
|
|
|
|
|
===={{la|Popular Front of India}}==== |
|
|
'''full protection'''. High level of IP vandalism. ] (]) 16:53, 2 August 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 16:49, 2 August 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Changes by people associated with ] == |
|
{{Edit extended-protected|Popular Front of India|answered=yes}} |
|
|
Pfi was not formed to counter Hindus but to oppose Hindus and establish Islamist supremacy and to subdue others . It's written in their own charter that they want to make india and Islamic state by 2047 ] (]) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:] '''Not done:''' please provide ] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> The current statement is supported by reliable sources. <span style="font-family:monospace;">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ]) 09:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 October 2024 == |
|
I suspect that people employed or associated with ] and ] are forking this article with their propaganda. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Popular Front of India|answered=yes}} |
|
These are the google news search results ] |
|
|
|
In the Criticism and accusations section, under the heading/subsection, "Creation of an Islamic State in India", please add this: The PFI wanted to establish Islamic rule in India by 2047 as per the ].<ref name="e270">{{cite web | last=Ramdas | first=P | title=PFI wanted to establish Islamic rule in India by 2047: NIA | website=The New Indian Express | date=26 June 2024 | url=https://www.newindianexpress.com/states/kerala/2024/Jun/26/pfi-wanted-to-establish-islamic-rule-in-india-by-2047-nia-3 | access-date=2 October 2024}}</ref> ] (]) 16:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:11 days have passed since I made this request. How do I get someone to respond or carry out my request?-] (]) 13:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
Done sorry for the delay.] (]) 17:57, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 2 October 2024 (2) == |
|
Please also take a look at the related discussion- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{edit extended-protected|Popular Front of India|answered=yes}} |
|
] |
|
|
|
In the Criticism and accusations section, under the heading/subsection, "Links to terrorist organizations", please change this sentence, "In November 2019, the Central Government provided Z category security to Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of India and part of the bench which passed the Ayodhya verdict" to, "In November 2019, the Central Government provided Z category security to Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of India and part of the bench which passed the Ayodhya verdict, due to threats by the PFI". ] (]) 16:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
] (]) 16:12, 3 August 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
:: It is revealed that, ] is a ] pusher by the Wiki Administrators. I have a strong suspicion he is a ] of some banned users in Misplaced Pages. see ] -- ] (]) 16:50, 4 August 2010 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:11 days have passed since I made this request. How do I get someone to respond or carry out my request?-] (]) 13:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
== Lot of ]s in first paragraph == |
|
|
|
Very sorry for the delay.] (]) 17:58, 13 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
The reference is just a comment (Rejoinder) of a user on a the detailed report of Empower India Conferece came in the weekly. This doesn't meet the criteria of an wikipedia reference. The "Love Jihad" is proven as a fake story and the high court says that the arguments are baseless. ,,. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:{{re|Pharaoh of the Wizards}} I see that you have just copied and pasted the whole thing but you were supposed to avoid copying the first bit, that is, the sentence to be replaced. Please delete the old sentence now (and add links where they are needed).-] (]) 19:17, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
It is hereby requested to discuss before you further push information from propaganda pamphlets. |
|
|
] (]) 17:38, 4 August 2010 (UTC) |
|
:Done hopefully got it right this time.] (]) 19:40, 15 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::{{re|Pharaoh of the Wizards}} Please remove the inverted commas and add a full stop at the end of the sentence.-] (]) 03:27, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Done hopefully it is right now.] (]) 03:40, 16 October 2024 (UTC) |
Pfi was not formed to counter Hindus but to oppose Hindus and establish Islamist supremacy and to subdue others . It's written in their own charter that they want to make india and Islamic state by 2047 Abraca21 (talk) 08:54, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
In the Criticism and accusations section, under the heading/subsection, "Creation of an Islamic State in India", please add this: The PFI wanted to establish Islamic rule in India by 2047 as per the NIA. QueSera1 (talk) 16:19, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
In the Criticism and accusations section, under the heading/subsection, "Links to terrorist organizations", please change this sentence, "In November 2019, the Central Government provided Z category security to Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of India and part of the bench which passed the Ayodhya verdict" to, "In November 2019, the Central Government provided Z category security to Justice S. Abdul Nazeer, one of the judges of the Supreme Court of India and part of the bench which passed the Ayodhya verdict, due to threats by the PFI". QueSera1 (talk) 16:26, 2 October 2024 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. The current statement is supported by reliable sources. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 09:31, 2 June 2024 (UTC)