| Revision as of 06:17, 29 January 2023 editFermiboson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers2,415 edits →A very, very, very old block: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:44, 5 January 2025 edit undoGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers381,979 edits →Precious anniversary: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (41 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| {{User:MuZemike/Talkheader}} | {{User:MuZemike/Talkheader}} | ||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| {| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0" | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |'''] |''' <span style="font-size:85%">June 2022 Backlog Drive</span> | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| * On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. | |||
| * Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. | |||
| * Interested in taking part? ''']'''! | |||
| |- | |||
| |colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives.<br> ] to opt out of any future messages. | |||
| == Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you == | |||
| (] · ]) ''']''' 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Buidhe@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Good_articles/GAN_Backlog_Drives/Mailing_list&oldid=1090143622 --> | |||
| I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @] | |||
| ==Birmal Hembram.== | |||
| this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself. | |||
| I just finished cleaning up the mess made by these two block evading accounts: ],]. I'm not a big fan of allowing the Birmal Hembram. (with a period) article to existing for any amount of time, given it's provenance. Any objections to a speedy? The subject's name is not mentioned on any of the reliable sources; it's only mentioned on the two self-published sources. As far as I can tell, the medium source is simply a copy of one of the other articles with the subjects name inserted. <b>] ]</b> 14:23, 30 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :I have no objections. It looked like the 2nd source was a little suspect, also. --] 14:57, 30 May 2022 (UTC) | |||
| are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? ] (]) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Page Amir Mohammad Nekounam == | |||
| :Sorry, but I no longer actively work on ]. --] 14:46, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi,I have a request to remove the tags from Amir Mohammad Nekounam's page | |||
| Reason: | |||
| I have added credible sources to Amir Mohammad Nekounam's page in the past few days ] (]) 16:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Not how it works. Please comment at ], as been pointed out to you several times. Continual removing of the tags from the page may result in your block from an admin. --] 16:05, 13 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| Please agree with me because I have added the desired resources and I do not know where the problem is and so I removed the tags but now I ask you to remove the tags according to the available resources ] (]) 16:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| ::Again, that's not how the process works. Please reread the comment I just made above and comment in the deletion discussion there. --] 16:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| == Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Church of Singapore == | |||
| Thanks for helping out at ], but, well, the one that closed the AfD as "speedy keep" is the article creator, not the nom or an uninvolved editor. They have done this twice, and have also removed the AFD notice from the article repeatedly. I don't want to keep edit warring over it, better to let someone uninvolved handle it. ] (]) 12:06, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| :OK, didn't see that. I was just trying to fix the AfD close so that it didn't affect the rest of the discussions on ]. --] 12:08, 28 June 2022 (UTC) | |||
| {{-}} | {{-}} | ||
| == Precious anniversary == | == Precious anniversary == | ||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years= |
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Four}} | ||
| --] (]) 10:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == Suggestion == | |||
| Hello, MuZemike! You might be interested in ] an essay in which creation I participated – ]. Of course, this is just a suggestion, nothing more. Cheers! — ] ] <sup>(] / ])</sup> 22:46, 24 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == A very, very, very old block == | |||
| Hi, this may come a bit out of the blue, and I'm sure you don't remember anything. I was scrolling around random articles and their edit histories when I noticed that one ] was blocked by you in 2010 for sockpuppeting. The account appears to be one of those accounts which spam-creates geographical stubs (a practice which, as I understand, is no longer accepted nowadays but was acceptable at the time). Around the time of the block, there was a bit of a heated discussion at ANI and the user had blanked the user/talk page. I could, however, find absolutely no trace of sockpuppeting even being mentioned in any of these instances. Is there a reason for this? Regards, ] (]) 06:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:44, 5 January 2025
Credit: Diego Delso
Subpages: Articles worked on · Good article reviews · GA standards · common.css · common.js
Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):
- 2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present
Good article reassessment for Kingdom of Sicily
Kingdom of Sicily has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wild Arms (video game)
Wild Arms (video game) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you
I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @M.Bitton this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself.
are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? 109.64.104.168 (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I no longer actively work on WP:SPI. --MuZemike 14:46, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|