| Revision as of 05:04, 31 October 2023 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,303,657 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:MuZemike/Archive 11) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:44, 5 January 2025 edit undoGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers381,979 edits →Precious anniversary: new sectionTag: New topic | ||
| (26 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown) | |||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| {{User:MuZemike/Talkheader}} | {{User:MuZemike/Talkheader}} | ||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| == A very, very, very old block == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| Hi, this may come a bit out of the blue, and I'm sure you don't remember anything. I was scrolling around random articles and their edit histories when I noticed that one ] was blocked by you in 2010 for sockpuppeting. The account appears to be one of those accounts which spam-creates geographical stubs (a practice which, as I understand, is no longer accepted nowadays but was acceptable at the time). Around the time of the block, there was a bit of a heated discussion at ANI and the user had blanked the user/talk page. I could, however, find absolutely no trace of sockpuppeting even being mentioned in any of these instances. Is there a reason for this? Regards, ] (]) 06:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Looking at ], the user was blocked as a sock back when I was an admin and CU, presumably per CU evidence. The sockmaster, whom I did not disclose, was warned privately not to sock again, according to that discussion. Any other information I would have about that specific case would be long gone, I'm afraid. --] 15:26, 29 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ::Alright, thank you very much for the reply. ] (]) 15:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you == | |||
| == Inquiry == | |||
| I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @] | |||
| Hello, MuZemike, your talk archive pages 1-7, and 9 are all currently admin level protected. As you are not currently an admin at this time, I wondered if you would have any objection (as the page protector) to their protection levels being lowered to extended confirmed? | |||
| this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself. | |||
| are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? ] (]) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| My personal interest in these 8 pages is I'd like to address the large number of (a high priority ] error that affect how some users' signatures display on these pages) and plan on filing a ] for reduction so I can address these, unless there is an objection. My edits would be minimal (one edit per page), thorough, and respectful. ] (]) 00:58, 20 March 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :Sorry, but I no longer actively work on ]. --] 14:46, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{-}} | |||
| :It was protected by another admin, so I personally have no issue with it. --] 13:31, 16 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Precious anniversary == | |||
| {{User QAIbox/auto|years=Four}} | |||
| == afd == | |||
| --] (]) 10:44, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hi there, | |||
| I wanted to ask why is the page keep getting added for AFD? It already passed, and then user US-Verified has been putting a lot of pages for AFD, for no reason. ] (]) 12:59, 18 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| :The previous AfD closed as "no consensus", which means it can be re-tagged for AfD at a later time, which it has (though it may have been a little early, there is no time limit). In any case, discuss the 2nd AfD at ] as opposed to removing the tag from the article. | |||
| :Moreover, see the ] for valid reasons for deletion. --] 01:01, 19 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
| ==Orphaned non-free image File:Car Town.jpg== | |||
| ] Thanks for uploading ''']'''. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a ]. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see ]). | |||
| Note that any non-free images not used in any '''articles''' will be deleted after seven days, as described in ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:Di-orphaned fair use-notice --> --] (]) 17:14, 30 August 2023 (UTC) | |||
| == Deletion review for ] == | |||
| An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRVNote --> ] (]) 04:33, 31 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:44, 5 January 2025
Credit: Diego Delso
Subpages: Articles worked on · Good article reviews · GA standards · common.css · common.js
Archives as of the dates listed (250KB or more to load; threads more than 3 days to be archived by bot or earlier upon personal discretion; displayed in order of date of last thread):
- 2009-04-29 · 2009-10-17 · 2010-01-09 · 2010-04-27 · 2010-08-12 · 2010-11-21 · 2010-03-10 · 2011-08-07 · 2012-01-28 · 2012-09-17 · present
Good article reassessment for Kingdom of Sicily
Kingdom of Sicily has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:24, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Wild Arms (video game)
Wild Arms (video game) has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 13:38, 3 November 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I whould like to file an SockPupet Investigation report but the page was protected by you
I would like the SockpupetTeam to investigate the SPA which is @M.Bitton this page was protected by you so I am Unable to Do this Change By myself.
are you willing to assist me with this change and investigation of this single purpose account? 109.64.104.168 (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I no longer actively work on WP:SPI. --MuZemike 14:46, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Precious anniversary
 | |
| Four years! |
|---|