| Revision as of 17:25, 9 November 2024 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,301,698 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject International relations/Archive 7) (bot← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 00:05, 6 January 2025 edit undoMusikBot (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Bots, Mass message senders209,456 edits →One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!: new section | ||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| {{Archives|auto=yes|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=61|minthreadsleft=4}} | {{Archives|auto=yes|bot=lowercase sigmabot III|age=61|minthreadsleft=4}} | ||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| == Bilateral relations articles == | |||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 23:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| I've noticed that {{user|Kawnhr}} has been changeing the lead statement like . I have worked on 100s of bilateral articles and the standard introduction is that. They have only changed this for Canada related articles, there are probably over a 1000 of these bilateral articles. Also is changing from the standard "See Also" section in 100s of bilaterals. ] (]) 04:32, 26 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :I think there is consensus (and support in the MOS) for edits like the first one changing the lead sentence. See the past discussion here: ]. —] (] '''·''' ]) 13:23, 26 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :It is true that "X–Y relations are the relations between X and Y" is the common introduction, but it is by no means universal — there were several foreign relations articles that did not use that even before I started my edits, such as ], ], ], ], etc. Regardless, just being the common introduction does not mean it is unassailable or even correct. | |||
| :The Manual of Style is clear that we do not absolutely have to include (and bold) the article name in the lead. ] says {{tquote|If the article's title does not lend itself to being used easily and naturally in the first sentence, the wording should not be distorted in an effort to include it. Instead, simply describe the subject in normal English, avoiding unnecessary redundancy.}} Furthermore, because ] says we must avoid putting links in the boldface recitation of the title, that means we can't link to X and Y countries without mentioning them again, which leads to awkward, redundant phrasing. But don't take it from me; ] says {{tquote|The title need not appear verbatim in the lead if it is descriptive.}}, and specifically uses the "X–Y relations are the relations between X and Y" as something ''not'' to do. I am only bringing these articles in-line with what the MOS suggests. | |||
| :I'm not sure what you're getting at by pointing out I've only done this for Canadian articles. Is it that I've now put Canada out of step with the others? Well, I'm only one person… I can't make changes to over a thousand pages in two days… | |||
| :That said, I fully own up to making a mistake with the "See Also" section. My intent was to remove repeated links (generally frowned upon per ]), but I forgot that navboxes don't (or don't always) display on mobile, so those links are still helpful for mobile readers. I'll go through my edits and restore those. — ] (]) 16:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hi everyone. It's been over a week since this thread was created and nobody else has objected… can I take this to mean that the changes are fair game? Would it be controversial to resume these edits? — ] (]) 20:43, 7 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Even though it's been over a week, I would like to see more community input. ] (]) 23:27, 7 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::As an alternate, I've seen "X–Y relations are the relations between these 2 countries." ] (]) 04:21, 9 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Agree with others above that the change seems good. "X–Y relations are X–Y relations" is not a good opening, best to just go into the topic per ]. ] (]) 04:50, 9 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I don't see how that's meaningfully different… it still has the same problem of redundancy. — ] (]) 17:24, 9 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::OK, well, I think it's clear by now that there is no community objection. I will be resuming these edits shortly. — ] (]) 23:53, 26 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Actually I think you should refrain from your campaign of systematically introducing bias to dozens of Misplaced Pages articles regarding Canada's international relations... ] (]) 02:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Please explain the bias? — ] (]) 05:20, 16 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 00:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) |
||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ''']]''' 11:33, 1 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 22:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| == ] RfC == | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ''']]''' 13:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Requested move at ] == | |||
| There's a discussion at ] about whether specific prose attributed to Benny Morris should be added to ]. Editors are invited to participate. '']''<sup>]</sup> 07:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] (]) 17:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Idea about diplomat categorization == | |||
| == RfC at ] == | |||
| I am about to post an idea about fiplomat categorization at Misplaced Pages:Wikiproject Categorization. People here may have thoughts as well.] (]) 16:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>''']''', which is within the scope of this WikiProject, has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the ''']'''.<!-- Template:Rfc notice--> Thank you. ] (]) 17:05, 25 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :It is actually ] It will be on the talk page there.] (]) 16:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 18:10, 25 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 23:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. ] |
||
| == Consuls == | |||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. |
||
| At ] I posted some questions regarding the name and scope of Category:Consuls that people may want to comment on.] (]) 17:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Assistance with interpreting scope and manner of a UN event == | |||
| == Two almost identical pages should be merged == | |||
| Hello, I see new draft at Wikinews, sister of Misplaced Pages, about a ceasefire call: ''']'''. I have difficulty understanding structure of the UN organisation or its events. Please view the talk page of the article and assist at your earliest convenience? Thank you in advance. ] (], ]) 06:24, 30 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] | |||
| ⚫ | == Requested move at ] == | ||
| ⚫ | ] There is a requested move discussion at ] that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. <span style="white |
||
| ] | |||
| ⚫ | == Good article reassessment for ] == | ||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 07:50, 7 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| These two articles are almost identical and should be merged. Retaining both is confusing ] (]) 23:00, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| :No, they are about different topics. The first article is about missions that foreign countries operate in Timor-Leste (mainly embassies in ]) and for diplomacy with Timor-Leste. The second article is about missions that the government of Timor-Leste operates in other countries. —] (] '''·''' ]) 23:19, 30 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:35, 18 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement! == | |||
| == Good article reassessment for ] == | |||
| ⚫ | ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the ]. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ] (]) |
||
| {| style="background:#FFFFFF; border:2px solid #000080; padding: 10px; width: 100%" | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| Hello,<br>Please note that ''']''', which is within this project's scope, has been selected as one of the ''']'''. The article is ] to appear on Misplaced Pages's ] in the "Articles for improvement" section for one week, beginning today. Everyone is encouraged to collaborate to improve the article. Thanks, and happy editing! <!-- Substituted from Template:AFI project notice --><br /> | |||
| <sub>Delivered by <!-- mbsig --><span style="font-family:sans-serif">— <b>] <sup>]</sup></b></span><!-- mbdate --> 00:05, 6 January 2025 (UTC) on behalf of the AFI team</sub> | |||
| |- | |||
| |} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:05, 6 January 2025
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject International relations and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
 | This project page was nominated for deletion on 11 April 2007. The result of the discussion was Keep (withdrawn). |
 | This project page does not require a rating on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 61 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Requested move at Talk:Scolding Letters#Requested move 13 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Scolding Letters#Requested move 13 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Dick Cheney
Dick Cheney has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:39, 21 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:European Union–United States relations#Requested move 23 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:European Union–United States relations#Requested move 23 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Web-julio (talk) 00:09, 25 November 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Battle of Aleppo (2024)#Requested move 30 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Battle of Aleppo (2024)#Requested move 30 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Abo Yemen✉ 11:33, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Yemeni civil war (2014–present)#Requested move 7 December 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Yemeni civil war (2014–present)#Requested move 7 December 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Abo Yemen✉ 13:13, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Gaza Strip famine#Requested move 27 November 2024
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Gaza Strip famine#Requested move 27 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Feeglgeef (talk) 17:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
Idea about diplomat categorization
I am about to post an idea about fiplomat categorization at Misplaced Pages:Wikiproject Categorization. People here may have thoughts as well.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:14, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
- It is actually Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Categories It will be on the talk page there.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:19, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for Eurasian Economic Union
Eurasian Economic Union has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:25, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
Consuls
At Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Categories I posted some questions regarding the name and scope of Category:Consuls that people may want to comment on.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:38, 29 December 2024 (UTC)
Two almost identical pages should be merged
List of diplomatic missions in Timor-Leste
List of diplomatic missions of Timor-Leste
These two articles are almost identical and should be merged. Retaining both is confusing Blue Moses (talk) 23:00, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
- No, they are about different topics. The first article is about missions that foreign countries operate in Timor-Leste (mainly embassies in Dili) and for diplomacy with Timor-Leste. The second article is about missions that the government of Timor-Leste operates in other countries. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 23:19, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
One of your project's articles has been selected for improvement!
 Hello, |