Revision as of 00:25, 16 September 2024 editTarnishedPath (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers17,692 edits →Image in infobox: ReplyTag: Reply← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 00:30, 6 January 2025 edit undoTarnishedPath (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers17,692 edits Assessment: banner shell, Biography (Rater) |
(12 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
⚫ |
{{contentious topics/page restriction talk notice|protection=ecp|1RR=yes|ap}} |
|
{{American English}} |
|
{{American English}} |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=c|living=yes |activepol=yes |collapsed=yes |listas=Willis, Fani|1= |
|
{{WikiProject banner shell |class=B |blp=activepol |collapsed=yes |listas=Willis, Fani |1= |
|
{{WikiProject African diaspora |importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject African diaspora |importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography |politician-work-group=y |politician-priority= |activepol=y}} |
|
{{WikiProject Biography |politician-work-group=yes |politician-priority= }} |
|
{{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) |importance=Low |atlanta=y}} |
|
{{WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) |importance=Low |atlanta=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Law |importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States |USPresidents=yes|USPresidents-importance=Low|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States |USPresidents=yes|USPresidents-importance=Low|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women's History |importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Women's History |importance=Low}} |
|
|
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{Connected contributor|Yedaman54|declared=1154772100}} |
|
{{Connected contributor|Yedaman54|declared=1154772100}} |
⚫ |
{{contentious topics/page restriction talk notice|protection=ecp|1RR=yes|ap}} |
|
|
|
|
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
{{Annual readership}} |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
Line 24: |
Line 22: |
|
| minthreadsleft = 3 |
|
| minthreadsleft = 3 |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
__TOC__ |
|
{{reqp}} |
|
|
== Bad infobox image and odd placement of image in body of article == |
|
|
|
|
|
1. The of Fani Willis is oddly cropped, at a strange angle, and has a blurred background. Is there a better image we can use for this? A district attorney should have a recent, publicly available image online that we can use without fear of copyright. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. The of Fani Willis and Nikema Williams in the 2020 election influence investigation section is oddly placed. No mention in the article is made of how Fani Willis and Nikema Williams relate to one another, or why this image should be specifically placed within the 2020 election influence investigation section of the article itself. ] (]) 03:44, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
:@], please have a look at the edit I've just made. '']''<sup>]</sup> 08:09, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks! #2 seems to be solved, but putting that image of Fani Willis as the new infobox image still isn't a great image. I'm not sure if there is another image of Fani Willis we have that could use. A simple headshot would work well, I would imagine. ] (]) 20:47, 28 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:::We don't always have access to the best free images or sometimes have to wait for them to come along. Is the replacement image better than what was there previously? '']''<sup>]</sup> 00:51, 29 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:I would agree the infobox picture is oddly cropped and blurry. I wouldn't mind replacing it if we have access to a better one. I am just not sure if we actually do have any other pictures that don't impede on copyright infringement. ] (]) 18:27, 2 May 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Georgia Court of Appeals == |
|
== Georgia Court of Appeals == |
Line 48: |
Line 36: |
|
Hi all, for the infobox image what should the best corse of action be. I feel that the most updated photo of Willis is not very good when compared with the other images available on commons. Any thoughts? ] (]) 20:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
Hi all, for the infobox image what should the best corse of action be. I feel that the most updated photo of Willis is not very good when compared with the other images available on commons. Any thoughts? ] (]) 20:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:The image with the blurred background looks weird as the blurring goes right up to her face and makes her hair look funny. The most up to date image, which not perfect, is preferable. '']''<sup>]</sup> 00:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
:The image with the blurred background looks weird as the blurring goes right up to her face and makes her hair look funny. The most up to date image, while not perfect, is preferable. '']''<sup>]</sup> 00:25, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::Dude she looks like a gremlin in that photo. It also a large amount of motion blur on her hands. The other photo while yes having a blurred background has a clear photo of her face and quite frankly its a less ugly image. ] (]) 02:34, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
:::Looks like a gremlin is your subjective opinion. The blurring of the entire background in the older photo is jarring when all of a sudden her face is in focus. '']''<sup>]</sup> 03:07, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::::Your opinions of the blurring is also subjective. Look I get you like the photo cause you uploaded it but we need some other opinions on this. ] (]) 17:04, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:Honestly neither photo is that great. Perhaps there's an official portrait that we can use under Fair Use or something? ] (]) 20:37, 16 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
::I agree that neither photo is perfect. Unfortunately we can't do Fair Use of photos that are under copyright when we have alternative photos available to use that have free use. In this circumstance it's a decision of which of the imperfect photo is better. '']''<sup>]</sup> 01:02, 17 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
:::How about no photo until a better one is uploaded? ] (]) 08:26, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
⚫ |
::::Any photo is better than none. I think the questions comes down to which is the best of the two imperfect photo. '']''<sup>]</sup> 09:32, 20 September 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Fani REMOVED from case == |
|
|
|
|
|
Appeals Court has removed Fani Willis from the Trump Georgia case |
|
|
|
|
|
https://apnews.com/article/trump-fani-willis-georgia-election-indictment-removed-0aa6db3b7abed22eb08ed9323f687972 |
|
|
|
|
|
https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/5048455-fani-willis-disqualified-trump-georgia/ |
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/politics/georgia-appeals-court-removes-prosecutor-fani-willis-from-trump-election-case |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
] (]) 15:37, 19 December 2024 (UTC) |
In the section dealing with teh 2020 electoin interference investiagation it is stated that "In May 2024, the Georgia Court of Appeals agreed to hear an appeal to the ruling, revisiting whether Willis may be allowed to stay on the case
". Has there been any progress on this? I ask because I'm in Australia and I don't see the same news as American editors. TarnishedPath 00:23, 6 September 2024 (UTC)
Hi all, for the infobox image what should the best corse of action be. I feel that the most updated photo of Willis is not very good when compared with the other images available on commons. Any thoughts? Yedaman54 (talk) 20:52, 15 September 2024 (UTC)