| Revision as of 20:06, 3 December 2005 editSplash (talk | contribs)33,425 edits →Votes: discussion more important← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 12:52, 6 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,301,698 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Misplaced Pages talk:Deletion review/Archives/2024/June) (bot | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{User:MiszaBot/config | |||
| '''Archives''': | |||
| |maxarchivesize = 500K | |||
| ] | |||
| |minthreadsleft = 5 | |||
| ] | |||
| |archive = Misplaced Pages talk:Deletion review/Archives/%(year)d/%(monthname)s | |||
| ] | |||
| |algo = old(180d) | |||
| ] | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |||
| }} | |||
| {{Talk header|noarchives=yes|search=no|WT:DRV}} | |||
| {{notice|This is '''not''' the place to contest a deletion or to request a history undeletion. Follow the instructions at ]. This page is for discussing maintenance issues, proper usage of deletion review, etc.}} | |||
| {{Archive box|search=yes|archive_age=180|archive_bot=Lowercase sigmabot III| | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2010''': {{Archives by months|2010}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2011''': {{Archives by months|2011}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2012''': {{Archives by months|2012}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2013''': {{Archives by months|2013}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2014''': {{Archives by months|2014}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2015''': {{Archives by months|2015}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2016''': {{Archives by months|2016}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2017''': {{Archives by months|2017}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2018''': {{Archives by months|2018}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2019''': {{Archives by months|2019}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2020''': {{Archives by months|2020}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2021''': {{Archives by months|2021}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2022''': {{Archives by months|2022}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2023''': {{Archives by months|2023}}}} | |||
| {{nowrap|'''2024''': {{Archives by months|2024}}}} | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| * ] | |||
| }} | |||
| __TOC__ | |||
| == |
== Neha Harsora == | ||
| I think somewhere at the top of the page we should describe standardized wording for votes, particularly given that the rather contradictory verbs '''endorse''' (the deletion) and '''oppose''' (the undeletion request) amount to the same thing. Perhaps stick with, '''undelete''' and '''keep deleted.''' ] 14:30, 19 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :There is already a yellow box describing precisely that. In the change to Deletion review, the notion of reviewing a not-delete debate was introduced, and the old wording doesn't really fit that. -]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 04:42, 20 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::Ah yes. To qualify then, we should follow the wording as presented. (And perhaps we should tidy the top of the page). ] 04:50, 20 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| I think it would be easier to read through this stuff if we switched to a format similar to that used in RFA. Have three numbered lists, "Endorse", "Relist", and "Overturn". --] 18:53, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :Not a vote. Is discussion. Splitting into votes not compatible with good discussion. -]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 18:55, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| ::I understand it's not a vote, but it's no more not a vote than RFA is not a vote. We're asking people to assert their preference for one of three alternatives; we might as well make it easy to figure out which of those they are asserting. --] 19:08, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| :::This is done by the bolding most people use. AfD works fine with this format. I see no need to change it here. Reading the discussion is vastly more important. -]<small><sup>]</sup></small> 20:06, 3 December 2005 (UTC) | |||
| Hi, I would like to contest the deletion of the article of this actress, but since it was deleted under G5 there was no consensus, hence where can I do it? ] (]) 04:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Archived to history == | |||
| :This is the wrong place to contest a deletion. If you go to ], you will see a box telling you to "please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below", that is to say, {{user|Explicit}}. --] 🌹 (]) 08:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| (i.e. deleted)<br/> | |||
| If I trimmed any current threads, a firm spanking is always welcome. - ]]] 06:12, 20 November 2005 (UTC) | |||
| == I want my article back == | |||
| The article I wrote was deleted around 2 years ago because 6 months passed without activity and now they wont undelete it because they think there's a conflict of interest. I am writing an article for Dr. Zouhair Amarin because I was his student. There is no conflict of interest as we are not colleagues, friends or family. I have maintained a neutral tone throughout the article. ] (]) 15:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{replyto|Zamarin}} This is not the place to make such a request. The notice at ] directs you as follows: | |||
| ::If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available ]. | |||
| :You need to follow that last link and do what it says. --] 🌹 (]) 21:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::@] The user already requested undeletion, which was declined, multiple times ] 22:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Twice, actually - once at 14:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC) and declined at 15:09, 16 August 2024 (UTC), i.e. before posting here; the second was at 16:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC) and declined at 16:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC), i.e. afterward. --] 🌹 (]) 07:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Status update of DRV still ongoing beyond 7 days == | |||
| Page ] was submitted for DRV on 26 Aug, now on the 9th the article message says review is still underway. Can someone tell me the status of it and what stages it awaits? ] (]) 00:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :The reason this debate is still open is a large number of our DRV regular closers got involved in the debate itself, in my case due to sub-optimal behaviour that was leading to disruption of the discussion. Having been involved in the process like that, I am reticent to close it per a broad interpretation of ], and I imagine a number of my peers are the same. It will be closed in due course. ] (]) 22:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Pawn (scripting language) == | |||
| : I plan to improve and expand the ] article to meet the required criteria. | |||
| : I intend to move ] to the mainspace and will strive to improve its quality. I would also like to highlight that on the page ]), there was a fairly supportive discussion about the topic's eligibility for a main article. | |||
| : I hope to gain support from the Misplaced Pages community to develop this article into a comprehensive source of information on the Pawn programming language. | |||
| ] (]) 01:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Instructions subpages == | |||
| The DRV instructions/rules are transcluded from ] (11 watchlisters) and ] (21 watchlisters), meaning any changes aren't visible to the main DRV page's 1316 watchlisters. Is there ]? If not, I think it'd make more sense to just copy them over. ] (]) 22:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :I don’t know the history of the splitting and transclusion of the instructions, but I think the semi-hidden content is very long overdue for editing. It’s convoluted, read differently by different people, and we reached an impasse years ago trying to fix it. ] (]) 22:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 12:52, 6 January 2025
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Deletion review page. |
|
 | This is not the place to contest a deletion or to request a history undeletion. Follow the instructions at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review. This page is for discussing maintenance issues, proper usage of deletion review, etc. |
Neha Harsora
Hi, I would like to contest the deletion of the article of this actress, but since it was deleted under G5 there was no consensus, hence where can I do it? 202.41.10.107 (talk) 04:44, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
- This is the wrong place to contest a deletion. If you go to Neha Harsora, you will see a box telling you to "please first contact the user(s) who performed the action(s) listed below", that is to say, Explicit (talk · contribs). --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 08:27, 20 July 2024 (UTC)
I want my article back
The article I wrote was deleted around 2 years ago because 6 months passed without activity and now they wont undelete it because they think there's a conflict of interest. I am writing an article for Dr. Zouhair Amarin because I was his student. There is no conflict of interest as we are not colleagues, friends or family. I have maintained a neutral tone throughout the article. Zamarin (talk) 15:38, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Zamarin: This is not the place to make such a request. The notice at User talk:Zamarin#Concern regarding Draft:Zouhair Amarin directs you as follows:
- If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
- You need to follow that last link and do what it says. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Redrose64 The user already requested undeletion, which was declined, multiple times Mach61 22:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
- Twice, actually - once at 14:10, 16 August 2024 (UTC) and declined at 15:09, 16 August 2024 (UTC), i.e. before posting here; the second was at 16:00, 16 August 2024 (UTC) and declined at 16:08, 16 August 2024 (UTC), i.e. afterward. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 07:56, 17 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Redrose64 The user already requested undeletion, which was declined, multiple times Mach61 22:19, 16 August 2024 (UTC)
Status update of DRV still ongoing beyond 7 days
Page The Peel Club was submitted for DRV on 26 Aug, now on the 9th the article message says review is still underway. Can someone tell me the status of it and what stages it awaits? Hellenistic accountant (talk) 00:43, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
- The reason this debate is still open is a large number of our DRV regular closers got involved in the debate itself, in my case due to sub-optimal behaviour that was leading to disruption of the discussion. Having been involved in the process like that, I am reticent to close it per a broad interpretation of WP:INVOLVED, and I imagine a number of my peers are the same. It will be closed in due course. Daniel (talk) 22:16, 9 September 2024 (UTC)
Pawn (scripting language)
- I plan to improve and expand the Pawn (scripting language) article to meet the required criteria.
- I intend to move the Pawn (programming language) draft to the mainspace and will strive to improve its quality. I would also like to highlight that on the page Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pawn (scripting language), there was a fairly supportive discussion about the topic's eligibility for a main article.
- I hope to gain support from the Misplaced Pages community to develop this article into a comprehensive source of information on the Pawn programming language.
Putu Suhartawan (talk) 01:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
Instructions subpages
The DRV instructions/rules are transcluded from Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Purpose (11 watchlisters) and Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Discussions (21 watchlisters), meaning any changes aren't visible to the main DRV page's 1316 watchlisters. Is there some non-obvious good reason for this? If not, I think it'd make more sense to just copy them over. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 22:09, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
- I don’t know the history of the splitting and transclusion of the instructions, but I think the semi-hidden content is very long overdue for editing. It’s convoluted, read differently by different people, and we reached an impasse years ago trying to fix it. SmokeyJoe (talk) 22:36, 5 January 2025 (UTC)