| Revision as of 13:15, 12 October 2011 editKygora (talk | contribs)445 edits →Please help: adding header← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 19:08, 6 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,304,377 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:Jayjg/Archive 43) (bot | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 125K | |maxarchivesize = 125K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 43 | ||
| |minthreadsleft = 3 | |||
| |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | |minthreadstoarchive = 1 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(7d) | ||
| |archive = User talk:Jayjg/Archive %(counter)d | |archive = User talk:Jayjg/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{/WelcomeNotice}} | {{/WelcomeNotice}} | ||
| {{AutoArchivingNotice|bot=MiszaBot III|age=14|small=yes}} | |||
| {{archives|auto=yes}} | {{archives|auto=yes|age=7|bot=MiszaBot III}} | ||
| {{busy|small=yes}} | {{busy|small=yes}} | ||
| <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> | <br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/><br/> | ||
| {{clear}} | {{clear}} | ||
| == |
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | ||
| An article that you have been involved in editing, '''Falafel''' ] has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the good article reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status will be removed from the article. ] (]) 01:27, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :I don't think I've made any significant edits to that article in years. Anyway, the fact that you dispute the accuracy of one source used for one sentence does not mean the Good Article status will be removed from the article. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 00:26, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == Also of interest to you == | |||
| Heya, | |||
| So I just started the article on the new Jewish international news network, ]. I thought you might like to check it out, see if improvements could be made, maybe add it to your watchlist, eh? :p Thanks. | |||
| And now, the . ] | <sup>]</sup> 01:59, 20 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :Nice article, interesting topic! ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 00:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Why thank you, but I am unfortunately dealing with ] who refuses to respond to my messages to him as well as my reverts of his material. If the third time (three of those messages including the welcome template are from the second time) talking to him is ignored that will be enough for COI right? I think that's reasonable. ] | <sup>]</sup> 29 Elul 5771 00:35, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::It's frustrating. I'll try to keep an eye on the article. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 01:10, 28 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == On a personal note == | |||
| Ktiva vehatima tova for 5772! A gut gebensht yor! ] (]) 21:34, 27 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == PunBB deletion == | |||
| You recently deleted ] for the second time, apparently because ] says you can due to the result of ]. Considering that the current ] article mentions PunBB, do you think redirecting “PunBB” to “FluxBB” should be acceptable, at least while “FluxBB” is an article? (“FluxBB” was discussed at ] but never deleted.) If redirecting is acceptable, how do we do it without having the redirect deleted again? | |||
| Since the initial deletion I created the redirect. Very recently I think someone turned it into an article. I would like to re-create the redirect, and if necessary put a note somewhere or modify your deletion criteria so that it does not get deleted again without a bit of warning. I would also undo your : I don’t see the benefit in this. Vadmium (], ]) 02:15, 28 September 2011 (UTC). | |||
| :In my turn, I would like to contest the deletion of the latest version of ] article itself. Here are the reasons for it: 1) the software is used by millions of people and thousands of sites around the world, hence deeming it popular; 2) Google search returns a lot of websites when you search “Powered by PunBB” - discussion boards and sites with extensions developed for PunBB. If it wasn't a significant project, then Google would not return as many results; 3) Facebook Developers were using PunBB engine for a long time, therefore it aided in creation and advancement of Facebook as we know it, pretty significant; 4) There is still an article on FluxBB on Wiki that wasn't deleted after a deletion discussion, hence it is only logical that the project that was foundation of FluxBB should be described as well; 5) there are many books in Google Books about PunBB, nearly 119 items are returned, with at least 6 solid books that can be quoted and referenced. | |||
| :Thank you for your attention, and I hope you will accept the facts named above as sufficient for letting the article about ] be in its place, or at least for continuing the deletion discussion, which initially took place as long ago as in February and hence is obviously based on outdated information. | |||
| :VoiceWithoutFace (]) 06:58, 28 September 2011 (UTC). | |||
| ::I didn't see ] ] references in the "new" article - can you point them out? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 00:59, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::As I understand, this discussion addresses two different issues: 1) if the project is significant enough to be featured on Misplaced Pages; and 2) if there are any reliable sources at hand. I hope you would agree that in case of the first issue, the project is worth being featured on Misplaced Pages (without any redirects) as it is used by many in the world. Concerning the second issue, we must admit that all articles on Misplaced Pages undergo constant improvement; however, PunBB article does not have a chance to be improved as it is getting deleted for the second time already. If there were an article to improve, I would be more than willing to include references to the published books I've found about PunBB and other discussion boards. Here is an example of at least two printed books: | |||
| :::Potts, Kevin. Web Design and Marketing Solutions for Business Websites. New York: Apress, 2007. Print. pp. 232-233 | |||
| :::Bradburne, Alan. Practical Rails Social Networking Sites. Berkeley, CA: Apress, 2007. Print. pp. 117 | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| :::I would highly appreciate your guidance and any input on how to make the article better, but I believe the decision to delete the article should be reconsidered. | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| :::VoiceWithoutFace (]), 8:03, 04 October 2011 (UTC). | |||
| ::::OK, that's a good start. Do they say anything significant about PunBB, or do they just mention it in passing? ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 18:43, 10 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| Jayjg, can you give me any comment on creating and keeping the redirect, or should I find somewhere else to discuss this? Are you saying you’re against it because ] doesn’t seem to have much in the way of secondary sources, or was that just about re-creating it as an article? ] (], ]) 04:33, 4 October 2011 (UTC). | |||
| :I have no issue with creating and keeping the redirect. The only problem was that people kept turning it into an article again. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 18:43, 10 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| == Please help == | |||
| </div> | |||
| Hi, | |||
| </div> | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/01&oldid=1258243333 --> | |||
| == Mink (manga) == | |||
| I made a request to SlimVirgin more than a week ago regarding a problem I created in one of the pages associated with WT:V. It seems that she is not currently active, and you helped out recently at WP:V, so I'd appreciate it if you would take a look at . What I need specifically is to have ] moved back to ] without a redirect, such that I can start the talk page at ]. Thanks, ] (]) 18:18, 2 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :I will try to take a look in the next couple of days. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 01:00, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks. ] (]) 01:04, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::I just checked, and a search shows: | |||
| :::Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability/First sentence/Polls (redirect from Wikipedia_talk:Verifiability/First sentence/Archive 1) | |||
| :::Can you take a look at this? Thanks, ] (]) 17:41, 6 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Done. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 18:41, 10 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| :::::Whew, thanks! ] (]) 19:58, 10 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
| I am interested in recreating the article for ]. I am not sure how the original article looked, but I have since found more sources for the article, including and a from '']''. ] (]) 00:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| == |
== Deletion review for ] == | ||
| An editor has asked for ] of ]. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.<!-- Template:DRV notice --> ] (]) 03:22, 6 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| Hey. Just thought it would interest you to know that ], the album by ], has reached GA status in less than two months after it was created and deleted like 40 times lol It's really a good article now, thought you'd enjoy seeing that. Cheers, ]] ] 05:47, 12 October 2011 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:08, 6 January 2025
| Thanks for visiting my Talk: page.
If you are considering posting something to me, please: *Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
Comments which fail to follow the four rules above may be immediately archived or deleted. Thanks again for visiting. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
 | This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Mink (manga)
I am interested in recreating the article for Mink (manga). I am not sure how the original article looked, but I have since found more sources for the article, including an interview with the author about the creation of the series and a review from Da Vinci. lullabying (talk) 00:42, 6 January 2025 (UTC)
Deletion review for Mink (manga)
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Mink (manga). Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. lullabying (talk) 03:22, 6 January 2025 (UTC)