Talk:Dragon Ball: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 08:59, 16 May 2022 editA09 (talk \| contribs)Edit filter helpers, Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,466 editsm Reverted edits by 43.225.26.150 (talk) to last version by Lowercase sigmabot IIITag: Rollback ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 13:07, 7 January 2025 edit undoAirshipJungleman29 (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors44,333 edits assess
(40 intermediate revisions by 30 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Vital article\|topic=Art\|level=5\|class=GA}}
	{{Skip to talk}}		{{Skip to talk}}
			{{Article history
	{{GA\|01:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)\|topic=langlit\|page=1\|oldid=571998372}}
			\|topic = langlit
	{{WikiProjectBannerShell\|1=

⚫	{{WikiProject Anime and manga\|dragon-ball-work-group=yes~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=High}}
			\|action1 = GAN
⚫	{{WikiProject Media franchises~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=Mid}}
			\|action1date = 01:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
⚫	{{WikiProject Magazines~~\|class=GA~~\|importance=Low}}
			\|action1link = Talk:Dragon Ball/GA1
			\|action1result = listed
			\|action1oldid = 571998372

			\|action2 = GAR
			\|action2date = 13:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
			\|action2link = Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Dragon Ball/1
			\|action2result = delisted
			\|action2oldid = 1267661325
			\|currentstatus = DGA
			}}
			{{WikiProject banner shell\|class=b\|vital=yes\|1=
		⚫	{{WikiProject Anime and manga\|dragon-ball-work-group=yes\|importance=High}}
		⚫	{{WikiProject Media franchises\|importance=Mid}}
		⚫	{{WikiProject Magazines\|importance=Low}}
	}}		}}
	{{Todo}}		{{Todo}}
			{{Refideas
			\|1=https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2024-09-08/toyo-keizai-dragon-ball-rights-are-unresolved-after-akira-toriyama-death/.213418
			}}

	{{Round In Circles}}		{{Round In Circles}}
Line 26:		Line 43:
	__TOC__		__TOC__

			== Dragon Ball Daima ==
	== Expand : : Find all Voice actors for the anime adaptations ==

	good luck with that LOL
	] (]) 19:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

			I was wondering if we should add the details about the new anime ] (]) 02:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
	== According to Toei Animation, Dragon Ball has sold 260 million copies ==

			:Agreed, there's already a redirect for it, but the article only mentions its existence in the info box. ] (]) 11:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
	The page is protected and I can't edit it. Dragon Ball Super has sold 260 million copies according to the Toei Animation news of May 9, 2021 (Source: https://corp.toei-anim.co.jp/en/press/press-6953497287618550869.html). Can someone change that information and put these numbers in? --] (]) 19:56, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

	== ~~Dragon~~ ~~Ball~~ Z ~~Kai~~ ~~Misplaced Pages~~ article ==		== Why is there no Dragon Ball Daima article yet? ==

	~~Hello~~ ~~there.~~ ~~Why~~ no ~~one~~ ~~realized~~ ~~that~~ ~~there~~'s no ~~Misplaced Pages~~ ~~article~~ ~~created~~ ~~for~~ ~~Dragon~~ ~~Ball~~ Z ~~Kai~~? ~~Please~~ ~~someone help me out create~~ it ~~asap.~~ ~~Thanks. <!-~~- ~~Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by~~ ] (]) 14:10, 15 ~~June~~ ~~2021~~ (UTC)~~</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->~~		Series comes out in a little over a month. It's fairly significant. Why isn't there a Daima article yet? Why does it just re-direct here? ] (]) 11:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

			:It already released now, someone really ought to make an article. ] (]) 00:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
	== About licensing revenue and merchandise sales. ==

			== GA concerns ==
	Found this for toei's
	https://corp.toei-anim.co.jp/en/ir.html

			I am concerned that this article no longer meets the ]. Some of my concerns are listed below:
	I think this gives us a clear information of how much overseas and domestic licensing makes. Instead of relying on bandai only. Licenseglobal while useful doesn't provide by series.

			*There are numerous uncited statements throughout the article, including entire paragraphs
	Also bandai's have already uploaded new Financial results. were they updated?
			*There numerous block quotes used in the article, which I think would be better as prose.
			*The lead is very long and contains a table, which is very usual for an article. I think this area needs to be reformatted.

			Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? Is not, should this go to ]? ] (]) 01:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
	https://www.bandainamco.co.jp/en/ir/library/result.html
	] (]) 11:26, 25 September 2021 (UTC)

			== Split proposal ==
	== Changing back into Japanese manga ==
			{{archive top}}
			I think that the topic of ''Dragon Ball'''s cultural impact is notable enough to justify its own page, and can probably be expanded upon significantly. I've started a draft for a new page with the content from this one: ]. Does a split sound reasonable? ] (]) 22:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

			:It's been several days with no objections, so I will take that as an affirmative. ] (]) 10:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
	Hi everyone. I suggest to change this article back into being considered a Japanese manga because if we were to still consider this to be a media franchise, many other series should also be considered that way but aren't however. Could someone please do this? Thanks! <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 14:32, 13 October 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
			{{archive bottom}}

			==GA Reassessment==
	:Since there is already an ] of that, then this should be a merge request. I don’t find it necessary though. Other mainstream manga/animes like One Piece and Naruto for example are justified in being split this way too. There definitely should be a limit though. ]<sup>''']'''</sup> 14:39, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
			{{Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Dragon Ball/1}}

Latest revision as of 13:07, 7 January 2025

Skip to table of contents

Dragon Ball was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 8, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
January 7, 2025	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

This

level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anime and manga: Dragon Ball High‑importance

	Anime and manga portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anime and manga, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of anime, manga, and related topics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anime and mangaWikipedia:WikiProject Anime and mangaTemplate:WikiProject Anime and mangaanime and manga
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Dragon Ball work group.

Media franchises Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media franchises, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to media franchises on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Media franchisesWikipedia:WikiProject Media franchisesTemplate:WikiProject Media franchisesmedia franchise
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Magazines Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Magazines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of magazines on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MagazinesWikipedia:WikiProject MagazinesTemplate:WikiProject Magazinesmagazine
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
See WikiProject Magazines' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

To-do list for Dragon Ball: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2013-07-21

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Expand : : Find all Voice actors for the anime adaptations
Update : : Make sure all license/airing info is up to date
Verify : : Check all sources to make sure they are WP:RS; source all unsourced, non-plot summary section
Other : : Clean up List of Dragon Ball video games, merge back any games that fail WP:N; add real lead
Clean up List of Dragon Ball soundtracks, merge back any that fail WP:MUSIC; add real lead

The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:

https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2024-09-08/toyo-keizai-dragon-ball-rights-are-unresolved-after-akira-toriyama-death/.213418

Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting.

Archives

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Dragon Ball (manga) archive
Dragon Ball GT archive

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Dragon Ball Daima

I was wondering if we should add the details about the new anime 66.244.95.12 (talk) 02:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Agreed, there's already a redirect for it, but the article only mentions its existence in the info box. Whatever you do, I'm probably not interested. (talk) 11:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Why is there no Dragon Ball Daima article yet?

Series comes out in a little over a month. It's fairly significant. Why isn't there a Daima article yet? Why does it just re-direct here? 141.126.92.77 (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)

It already released now, someone really ought to make an article. 2601:406:8480:7940:555C:1516:19B8:E836 (talk) 00:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

GA concerns

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

There are numerous uncited statements throughout the article, including entire paragraphs
There numerous block quotes used in the article, which I think would be better as prose.
The lead is very long and contains a table, which is very usual for an article. I think this area needs to be reformatted.

Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? Is not, should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)

Split proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I think that the topic of Dragon Ball's cultural impact is notable enough to justify its own page, and can probably be expanded upon significantly. I've started a draft for a new page with the content from this one: Draft:Cultural impact of Dragon Ball. Does a split sound reasonable? Di (they-them) (talk) 22:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

It's been several days with no objections, so I will take that as an affirmative. Di (they-them) (talk) 10:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Reassessment

Dragon Ball

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

The article contains uncited passages, including entire sections and paragraphs. Notes are used as citations to other Misplaced Pages articles, instead of citing the information directly in the article (note b and e) Z1720 (talk) 22:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

Comment: I'm pretty sure all those notes and several paragraphs regarding sales, estimated circulation figures and such were added by sockpuppet user Maestro2016, known for including that kind of information in several articles, doing sums with different sources (which is against WP:SYNTH), using sources of questionable reliability, and more, so I would recommend to check and remove that kind of content. Xexerss (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Categories: