Revision as of 11:04, 4 September 2024 edit141.126.92.77 (talk) →Why is there no Dragon Ball Daima article yet?: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 13:07, 7 January 2025 edit undoAirshipJungleman29 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors44,333 edits assess | ||
(10 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Skip to talk}} | {{Skip to talk}} | ||
{{Article history | |||
{{GA|01:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)|topic=langlit|page=1|oldid=571998372}} | |||
|topic = langlit | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject banner shell|class= |
||
|action1 = GAN | |||
|action1date = 01:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | |||
|action1link = Talk:Dragon Ball/GA1 | |||
|action1result = listed | |||
|action1oldid = 571998372 | |||
|action2 = GAR | |||
|action2date = 13:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
|action2link = Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Dragon Ball/1 | |||
|action2result = delisted | |||
|action2oldid = 1267661325 | |||
|currentstatus = DGA | |||
}} | |||
⚫ | {{WikiProject banner shell|class=b|vital=yes|1= | ||
{{WikiProject Anime and manga|dragon-ball-work-group=yes|importance=High}} | {{WikiProject Anime and manga|dragon-ball-work-group=yes|importance=High}} | ||
{{WikiProject Media franchises|importance=Mid}} | {{WikiProject Media franchises|importance=Mid}} | ||
Line 7: | Line 22: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{Todo}} | {{Todo}} | ||
{{Refideas | |||
|1=https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/news/2024-09-08/toyo-keizai-dragon-ball-rights-are-unresolved-after-akira-toriyama-death/.213418 | |||
}} | |||
{{Round In Circles}} | {{Round In Circles}} | ||
Line 24: | Line 42: | ||
}} | }} | ||
__TOC__ | __TOC__ | ||
== Maximum estimate Sales of Manga == | |||
The manga maximun estimate sales is 350 million, not 260. ] (]) 21:47, 25 April 2023 (UTC) | |||
== Dragon Ball Daima == | == Dragon Ball Daima == | ||
Line 34: | Line 48: | ||
:Agreed, there's already a redirect for it, but the article only mentions its existence in the info box. ] (]) 11:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) | :Agreed, there's already a redirect for it, but the article only mentions its existence in the info box. ] (]) 11:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC) | ||
== Dragon ball has loads of different types == | |||
Dragon ball | |||
dragon ball z | |||
dragon ball GT | |||
dragon ball super | |||
dragon ball super broly | |||
dragon ball super hero | |||
dragon ball exnoverse | |||
dragon ball exnoverse 2 ] (]) 14:55, 30 October 2023 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#Super Saiyan 6}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (] • ]) 07:27, 26 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== "]" listed at ] == | |||
] | |||
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 26#DragonBall and DragonBall Z}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> ] (] • ]) 07:29, 26 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Why is there no Dragon Ball Daima article yet? == | == Why is there no Dragon Ball Daima article yet? == | ||
Series comes out in a little over a month. It's fairly significant. Why isn't there a Daima article yet? Why does it just re-direct here? ] (]) 11:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC) | Series comes out in a little over a month. It's fairly significant. Why isn't there a Daima article yet? Why does it just re-direct here? ] (]) 11:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC) | ||
:It already released now, someone really ought to make an article. ] (]) 00:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
== GA concerns == | |||
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the ]. Some of my concerns are listed below: | |||
*There are numerous uncited statements throughout the article, including entire paragraphs | |||
*There numerous block quotes used in the article, which I think would be better as prose. | |||
*The lead is very long and contains a table, which is very usual for an article. I think this area needs to be reformatted. | |||
Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? Is not, should this go to ]? ] (]) 01:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
== Split proposal == | |||
{{archive top}} | |||
I think that the topic of ''Dragon Ball'''s cultural impact is notable enough to justify its own page, and can probably be expanded upon significantly. I've started a draft for a new page with the content from this one: ]. Does a split sound reasonable? ] (]) 22:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
:It's been several days with no objections, so I will take that as an affirmative. ] (]) 10:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
{{archive bottom}} | |||
==GA Reassessment== | |||
{{Misplaced Pages:Good article reassessment/Dragon Ball/1}} |
Latest revision as of 13:07, 7 January 2025
Skip to table of contents |
Dragon Ball was one of the Language and literature good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
Current status: Delisted good article |
This level-5 vital article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
To-do list for Dragon Ball: edit · history · watch · refresh · Updated 2013-07-21
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
Discussions on this page often lead to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
Archives | |||
| |||
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Dragon Ball Daima
I was wondering if we should add the details about the new anime 66.244.95.12 (talk) 02:13, 18 October 2023 (UTC)
- Agreed, there's already a redirect for it, but the article only mentions its existence in the info box. Whatever you do, I'm probably not interested. (talk) 11:20, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
Why is there no Dragon Ball Daima article yet?
Series comes out in a little over a month. It's fairly significant. Why isn't there a Daima article yet? Why does it just re-direct here? 141.126.92.77 (talk) 11:04, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
- It already released now, someone really ought to make an article. 2601:406:8480:7940:555C:1516:19B8:E836 (talk) 00:45, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
GA concerns
I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:
- There are numerous uncited statements throughout the article, including entire paragraphs
- There numerous block quotes used in the article, which I think would be better as prose.
- The lead is very long and contains a table, which is very usual for an article. I think this area needs to be reformatted.
Is anyone interested in fixing up this article? Is not, should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:14, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Split proposal
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I think that the topic of Dragon Ball's cultural impact is notable enough to justify its own page, and can probably be expanded upon significantly. I've started a draft for a new page with the content from this one: Draft:Cultural impact of Dragon Ball. Does a split sound reasonable? Di (they-them) (talk) 22:31, 22 November 2024 (UTC)
- It's been several days with no objections, so I will take that as an affirmative. Di (they-them) (talk) 10:36, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
GA Reassessment
Dragon Ball
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review
- Result: Delisted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
The article contains uncited passages, including entire sections and paragraphs. Notes are used as citations to other Misplaced Pages articles, instead of citing the information directly in the article (note b and e) Z1720 (talk) 22:11, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I'm pretty sure all those notes and several paragraphs regarding sales, estimated circulation figures and such were added by sockpuppet user Maestro2016, known for including that kind of information in several articles, doing sums with different sources (which is against WP:SYNTH), using sources of questionable reliability, and more, so I would recommend to check and remove that kind of content. Xexerss (talk) 22:20, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delisted good articles
- B-Class level-5 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-5 vital articles in Arts
- B-Class vital articles in Arts
- B-Class anime and manga articles
- High-importance anime and manga articles
- Dragon Ball work group articles
- All WikiProject Anime and manga pages
- B-Class media franchise articles
- Mid-importance media franchise articles
- WikiProject Media franchises articles
- B-Class magazine articles
- Low-importance magazine articles
- WikiProject Magazines articles
- Misplaced Pages pages with to-do lists