Misplaced Pages

Talk:Imane Khelif: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:15, 30 December 2024 editMC12GT1 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,078 edits →Old controversial: new sectionTags: Reverted New topic← Previous edit Latest revision as of 22:35, 7 January 2025 edit undoClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,379,450 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Imane Khelif/Archive 5. (BOT) 
(20 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 24: Line 24:
| format = %%i | format = %%i
}} }}

== Remove typo: italics from "references" in the last section ==

In the last section word ", references" is marked by italic after The Correspondent by typo. ] (]) 00:51, 20 November 2024 (UTC)

:{{done}}. ] (]) 01:39, 20 November 2024 (UTC)


== List of medals == == List of medals ==
Line 71: Line 65:
:These achievements already appear in the article. What is your comment, request, or suggestion? ] (]) 19:12, 30 November 2024 (UTC) :These achievements already appear in the article. What is your comment, request, or suggestion? ] (]) 19:12, 30 November 2024 (UTC)


== Old controversial == == Intro move ==

For you all thinking it's a bold move, we're here to talk. Now, I ask to you: why (maybe) every athlete on Misplaced Pages has a "normal" intro with no arguments about his/her sexual behavior while this (Imane) has to? ''gtp'' (]) 11:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

:I sympathise with the motivation but I don't think this works. First up, we are meant to avoid "Controversies" sections whenever possible. Secondly, the "controversies" are included throughout the rest of the article so having the section introducing it near the end seems back to front. It would be confusing for a reader, reading this for the first time.
:Now, I'm certainly not here to argue that the "controversies" are anything other than artificially created misogynistic bullshit (with maybe a little racism sprinkled on for seasoning) but we do have to explain them without endorsing or overplaying them. I think we need to put some, (maybe not all?) of this back in the lead. The advantage of this is that it provides context for the content that follows and also makes sure that anybody who only reads the lead (like a lot of people do when they are in a hurry) learns that there is absolutely no evidence that any of the allegations are true at all.
:One other thing that can be done to help is for editors who are good with sports articles to expand the coverage of her sporting activities so that this nonsense doesn't unfairly eclipse her achievements. ] (]) 12:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
::I really appreciate your answer and consideration. What's more the fact you didn't "aggressively" revert even if you could. Anyway, my answer would be very simple and surprising and seemingly bad compared to your well explained argument. Simple: lots of Wikipedians and, in particular, occasional editors to Misplaced Pages are sex-addicted people. Everything they do, think is lead by sex or sex-sublimation. I'm really tired of this and, sometimes, I will "fight" those edits again and again.
::As for this particular situation, there is also the negligence of who makes a surprise that one female boxeur (now professional) will seem quite androgyno, masculine. ''WTF'', she's a punching girl! It's clear she didn't play with Barbies...As well as women in rugby, women power lifters etc. The surprising, enciclopedicity, would be if Miss Universe will seem a male, not a boxeur!
::What's more, all claims started from disq. from World cup/championship sanctioned by Russia, ok? Russia, Putin, (obv. not everybody, not generalizing) a bunch of psychopathic pedophiles who aimed to have done some (vodka-influenced) "post-URSS" experiments on this babe. Final? With long hair she appears more feminine than half of ladies we can find out there.
::All this to say, I'm not here to censure the controversy, just I'll fight to "detach" that label from her name, by pushing it in proper section. Peace. ''gtp'' (]) 14:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
:::I removed the newly created "controversies" section because it's just a repeat of what's covered in the article. No comment on the rest. Here's the ] of what was removed just in case there is disagreement about it. ] (]) 22:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
::::I've reverted it back to the lead. It's not excessively repetitive and, it is, unfortunately, the main thing she is notable for, and so it has to be in the lead, although maybe not in this much detail. The lead should summarise the body. Given the extent to which she has been lied about we can't de-emphasise this. We can't "detach that label". What we can do is make sure that even the most casual reader is told from the start that none of it is true. --] (]) 01:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::"it is, unfortunately, the main thing she is notable for". This time, I totally disagree with you. It could be, in your fantastic world where people follow news 3x each-day, but for majority of the world 3 Billions indo/chinese she's nobody. Maybe for some chinos she's the one who punched their girl, so well known for the gold medal instead that for androgyne appear. (Also their chino-girl was not a kind of a chick, honestly) ''gtp'' (]) 07:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
:::::I'm not fighting, since edit warring would result in further more claims to her controversies, which could result in losing the way to may goal. Anyway, if you all were more honest, per coherence (since she's well known), you would change the "is an Algerian athlete" with "is a controversial public figure due to claims by Russia on her genes and by one Italian girl who got punched by her". Apologize my sarcasm, but you experienced editors are often wise politic. correct when it advantageous, while popular when it's not. ''gtp'' (]) 07:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

== This article avoids a discussion worth having ==
{{hat}}

There are various outlets actively reporting that Imane has DSD, claiming this is a similar situation as Caster Semanya. This Wiki article overly emphasizes that failure of published medical examination is clear indication of "misinformation" or "false claims" as if to dismiss the existence of a worthy debate. An objective view of the situation should discuss that much of the public backlash is coming from the unusually masculine features of this person, and general waning public support towards others with DSD (Caster) competing in female sports. The reason that's important to discuss is that if an eventual medical report comes out to verify active news stories (and DSD is confirmed), it doesn't validate either side of the controversy as public gender interpretation is not consistent. In other words, despite medically verified DSD in Caster, some people call Caster female and others call her male. The point is, the conversation is worth having to accurately reflect in an online encyclopedia that a debate exists. ] (]) 07:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)


I can't understand if you feminist are defending, because androgyne means gyno too OR are attacking 'cause she's to strong for you "girls"? Nothing personal. Just trying to understand. ''gtp'' (]) 13:15, 30 December 2024 (UTC) :Do you have any examples of these sources you can point us to? ] (]) 11:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
:This has been discussed and consensus arrived at in the RFC at ]. If no discussion point is put forward, about how to improve the article, relatively soon I will close this again per ]. '']''<sup>]</sup> 11:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
{{hab}}

Latest revision as of 22:35, 7 January 2025

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imane Khelif article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 30 days 
Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to articles about living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

  • You must be logged-in to an extended confirmed account (granted automatically to accounts with 500 edits and an age of 30 days)
  • You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on this article (except in limited circumstances)

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Imane Khelif. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Imane Khelif at the Reference desk.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.
WikiProject iconBiography: Sports and Games
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Misplaced Pages's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconAlgeria Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Algeria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Algeria on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AlgeriaWikipedia:WikiProject AlgeriaTemplate:WikiProject AlgeriaAlgeria
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconBoxing
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Boxing on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoxingWikipedia:WikiProject BoxingTemplate:WikiProject BoxingBoxing
WikiProject Boxing "To Do":

→ Help pick the next article for collaboration.


WikiProject iconOlympics Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconWomen
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women
WikiProject iconWomen's sport: Boxing Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Misplaced Pages. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Women's boxing task force.
ConsensusCurrent consensus (September 2024):
  • In this RfC there was no consensus to remove the sentence in the lead which states that no medical evidence that Khelif has XY chromosomes has been published, consensus against stating that Khelif was assigned female at birth and consensus that sources presenting evidence for the possibility of XY chromosomes are unreliable.
This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report 3 times. The weeks in which this happened:


List of medals

2018 Balkan Women's Tournament Silver

2019 african championship Gold

2020 Ahmet Comert Tournament silver African Olympic Qualifier Gold

2021 Bocskai Memorial Tournament silver Bosphorous Tournament Gold Golden Gloves Tournament Gold

2022 Strandja Memorial Gold Golden Belt Series Gold

2023 African Olympic Qualifier Gold

2024 USA Boxing International Tournament Gold Eindhoven Box Cup Gold 105.101.216.39 (talk) 19:02, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

These achievements already appear in the article. What is your comment, request, or suggestion? JFHJr (㊟) 19:12, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

Intro move

For you all thinking it's a bold move, we're here to talk. Now, I ask to you: why (maybe) every athlete on Misplaced Pages has a "normal" intro with no arguments about his/her sexual behavior while this (Imane) has to? gtp (talk) 11:28, 2 January 2025 (UTC)

I sympathise with the motivation but I don't think this works. First up, we are meant to avoid "Controversies" sections whenever possible. Secondly, the "controversies" are included throughout the rest of the article so having the section introducing it near the end seems back to front. It would be confusing for a reader, reading this for the first time.
Now, I'm certainly not here to argue that the "controversies" are anything other than artificially created misogynistic bullshit (with maybe a little racism sprinkled on for seasoning) but we do have to explain them without endorsing or overplaying them. I think we need to put some, (maybe not all?) of this back in the lead. The advantage of this is that it provides context for the content that follows and also makes sure that anybody who only reads the lead (like a lot of people do when they are in a hurry) learns that there is absolutely no evidence that any of the allegations are true at all.
One other thing that can be done to help is for editors who are good with sports articles to expand the coverage of her sporting activities so that this nonsense doesn't unfairly eclipse her achievements. DanielRigal (talk) 12:33, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
I really appreciate your answer and consideration. What's more the fact you didn't "aggressively" revert even if you could. Anyway, my answer would be very simple and surprising and seemingly bad compared to your well explained argument. Simple: lots of Wikipedians and, in particular, occasional editors to Misplaced Pages are sex-addicted people. Everything they do, think is lead by sex or sex-sublimation. I'm really tired of this and, sometimes, I will "fight" those edits again and again.
As for this particular situation, there is also the negligence of who makes a surprise that one female boxeur (now professional) will seem quite androgyno, masculine. WTF, she's a punching girl! It's clear she didn't play with Barbies...As well as women in rugby, women power lifters etc. The surprising, enciclopedicity, would be if Miss Universe will seem a male, not a boxeur!
What's more, all claims started from disq. from World cup/championship sanctioned by Russia, ok? Russia, Putin, (obv. not everybody, not generalizing) a bunch of psychopathic pedophiles who aimed to have done some (vodka-influenced) "post-URSS" experiments on this babe. Final? With long hair she appears more feminine than half of ladies we can find out there.
All this to say, I'm not here to censure the controversy, just I'll fight to "detach" that label from her name, by pushing it in proper section. Peace. gtp (talk) 14:29, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
I removed the newly created "controversies" section because it's just a repeat of what's covered in the article. No comment on the rest. Here's the diff of what was removed just in case there is disagreement about it. M.Bitton (talk) 22:41, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
I've reverted it back to the lead. It's not excessively repetitive and, it is, unfortunately, the main thing she is notable for, and so it has to be in the lead, although maybe not in this much detail. The lead should summarise the body. Given the extent to which she has been lied about we can't de-emphasise this. We can't "detach that label". What we can do is make sure that even the most casual reader is told from the start that none of it is true. --DanielRigal (talk) 01:18, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
"it is, unfortunately, the main thing she is notable for". This time, I totally disagree with you. It could be, in your fantastic world where people follow news 3x each-day, but for majority of the world 3 Billions indo/chinese she's nobody. Maybe for some chinos she's the one who punched their girl, so well known for the gold medal instead that for androgyne appear. (Also their chino-girl was not a kind of a chick, honestly) gtp (talk) 07:19, 3 January 2025 (UTC)
I'm not fighting, since edit warring would result in further more claims to her controversies, which could result in losing the way to may goal. Anyway, if you all were more honest, per coherence (since she's well known), you would change the "is an Algerian athlete" with "is a controversial public figure due to claims by Russia on her genes and by one Italian girl who got punched by her". Apologize my sarcasm, but you experienced editors are often wise politic. correct when it advantageous, while popular when it's not. gtp (talk) 07:37, 3 January 2025 (UTC)

This article avoids a discussion worth having

This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.


There are various outlets actively reporting that Imane has DSD, claiming this is a similar situation as Caster Semanya. This Wiki article overly emphasizes that failure of published medical examination is clear indication of "misinformation" or "false claims" as if to dismiss the existence of a worthy debate. An objective view of the situation should discuss that much of the public backlash is coming from the unusually masculine features of this person, and general waning public support towards others with DSD (Caster) competing in female sports. The reason that's important to discuss is that if an eventual medical report comes out to verify active news stories (and DSD is confirmed), it doesn't validate either side of the controversy as public gender interpretation is not consistent. In other words, despite medically verified DSD in Caster, some people call Caster female and others call her male. The point is, the conversation is worth having to accurately reflect in an online encyclopedia that a debate exists. Rlplaisted (talk) 07:47, 7 January 2025 (UTC)

Do you have any examples of these sources you can point us to? Riposte97 (talk) 11:36, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
This has been discussed and consensus arrived at in the RFC at Special:PermanentLink/1246750486#RfC_lead. If no discussion point is put forward, about how to improve the article, relatively soon I will close this again per WP:NOTFORUM. TarnishedPath 11:50, 7 January 2025 (UTC)
Categories: