Revision as of 18:00, 21 April 2004 view sourceGdr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users29,064 edits Revert vandalism by 216.124.78.250← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 16:58, 8 January 2025 view source Deb (talk | contribs)Administrators212,580 editsm improve wording | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{pp|small=yes}} | |||
A '''confidence trick''', '''confidence game''', or '''con''' for short, (also known as a '''scam''') is an attempt to intentionally ] a person or persons (known as the ''mark'') usually with the goal of financial or other gain. The ''confidence trickster'', ''con man'', ''scam artist'' or ''con artist'' often works with an accomplice called the '']'', who tries to encourage the mark by pretending to believe the trickster. In a traditional con, the mark is encouraged to believe that he will obtain money dishonestly by cheating a third party, and is stunned to find that due to what appears to be an error in pulling off the scam he is the one who loses money; in more general use, the term ''con'' is used for any fraud in which the victim is tricked into losing money by false promises of gain. | |||
{{Short description|Attempt to defraud a person or group}} | |||
{{Hatnote|Several terms redirect here. For the 2016 film, see ]. For counterfeits, see ]. For other uses, see ], ] and ].}} | |||
]: ] attempts to raise £100,000 for a college in Sudan by calling on the name of ]]] | |||
A '''scam''', or a '''confidence trick''', is an attempt to ] a person or group after first gaining their ]. Confidence tricks exploit victims using a combination of the victim's ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. Researchers have defined confidence tricks as "a distinctive species of fraudulent conduct ... intending to further voluntary exchanges that are not mutually beneficial", as they "benefit con operators ('con men') at the expense of their victims (the ']')".<ref name=Huang18>{{cite journal |first1=Lindsey |last1=Huang |first2=Barak |last2=Orbach |title=Con Men and Their Enablers: The Anatomy of Confidence Games |journal=Social Research: An International Quarterly |year=2018 |volume=85 |issue=4 |pages=795–822 |doi=10.1353/sor.2018.0050 |s2cid=150021652 |url=https://ssrn.com/abstract=3228077 |access-date=2018-09-03 |archive-date=2023-01-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230115101852/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3228077 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
==Terminology== | |||
Confidence tricks in general exploit the inherent ] and ] of their victims; it has been said by confidence tricksters that it was impossible to con a completely honest man. Often, the mark tries to out-cheat the conmen, only to discover that they have been manipulated into this. | |||
Other terms for "scam" include confidence trick, con, con game, confidence game, confidence scheme, ripoff, stratagem, finesse, grift, hustle, bunko, bunco, swindle, flimflam, gaffle, and bamboozle. | |||
The perpetrator is often referred to as a scammer, confidence man, con man, con artist, ], hustler, or swindler. The intended victims are known as marks, suckers, stooges, mugs, rubes, or gulls (from the word ''gullible''). When accomplices are employed, they are known as ]s. | |||
==Well-known Confidence Tricks== | |||
*'''Three Card Monte''', '''The Three-Card Trick''', '''Follow The Lady''' or '''Find the Lady'''. The trickster shows three playing cards to the audience, one of which is a queen (the ''lady''), then places the cards face-down, shuffles them around and invites the audience to bet on which one is the queen. At first the audience are sceptical, so the ''shill'' places a bet and the trickster allows him to win. This is sometimes enough to entice the audience to place bets, but the trickster uses sleight of hand to ensure that they always lose. See ]. | |||
* The ''']''' scam, which is essentially the same as the ]. The basic come-on is "we need your help to get some stolen money out of its hiding place". The victim sometimes goes in figuring he or she can cheat the con artists out of their money: anyone trying this has already fallen for the essential con, by believing that the money is there to steal. | |||
* The early ] favorite '''The Big Store''', around which scam the plot of the film '']'' revolves. Big store scams are described in detail in David W. Maurer's ''The Big Con'' (see references), on which the film was loosely based. They often involved teams of dozens of con artists working together with elaborate sets and costumes. | |||
*'''Religious cults'''. Some religious cults have been described by their critics as confidence tricks. It is alleged that their aim is to obtain money from their followers by deception. | |||
==Length== | |||
==Famous Con Artists== | |||
{{Anchor|short con|Short con|small con|Small con}}A ''short con'' or ''small con'' is a fast swindle that takes just minutes, possibly seconds. It typically aims to rob the victim of his money or other valuables that they carry on their person or are guarding.<ref>{{harvnb|Maurer|1999|loc=Ch. 8. Short-Con Games}}</ref> {{Anchor|long con|Long con|big con|Big con|long game|Long game}}A ''long con'' or ''big con'' (also, chiefly in British English, ''long game'')<ref name="NOOB">{{cite web|url=http://britishisms.wordpress.com/2012/06/05/the-long-game/ |title=The long game|last=Yagoda|first=Ben |work=Not One-off Britishisms|date=June 5, 2012|url-status=live|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20140707084040/http://britishisms.wordpress.com/2012/06/05/the-long-game/ |archive-date=July 7, 2014}} This language blog, while not a reliable etymological source, provides statistically gathered usage data that demonstrates neutral as well as critical usage, and that it is of British origin, only recently making notable inroads into American English.</ref> is a scam that unfolds over several days or weeks; it may involve a team of swindlers, and even props, sets, extras, costumes, and scripted lines. It aims to rob the victim of a huge amount of money or other valuables, often by getting them to empty out banking accounts and borrow from family members.<ref>{{harvnb|Reading|2012|loc=Ch. 1. Confidence}}</ref> | |||
* ], sold the ] | |||
* ], a.k.a. the ], one of the inspirations for the Academy-award winning film ''The Sting''. | |||
* ], organized massive ] ring in Denver in early 1900s | |||
==History== | |||
==Confidence tricks in the movies== | |||
The ] dates back at least to ].<ref>{{cite web|title= Shell Game|url=https://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/539702/shell-game|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110714065828/http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/539702/shell-game |archive-date=2011-07-14 }}</ref> ] (1821–1856) was the original "confidence man". Thompson was a clumsy swindler who asked his victims to express confidence in him by giving him money or their watch rather than gaining their confidence in a more nuanced way. A few people trusted Thompson with their money and watches.<ref name=Braucher15>{{cite journal |first1=Jean |last1=Braucher |first2=Barak |last2=Orbach |title=Scamming: The Misunderstood Confidence Man |journal=Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities |year=2015 |volume=72 |issue=2 |pages=249–292 |doi=10.2139/ssrn.2314071 |s2cid=148270133 }}</ref> Thompson was arrested in July 1849. Reporting on this arrest, James Houston, a reporter for the '']'', publicized Thompson by naming him the "Confidence Man".<ref name=Braucher15/> Although Thompson was an unsuccessful scammer, he gained a reputation as a genius operator mostly because Houston's satirical tone was not understood as such.<ref name=Braucher15 /> The '']'' coined the term "confidence game" a few weeks after Houston first used the name "confidence man".<ref name=Braucher15 /> | |||
''(incomplete)'' | |||
* ''Flim Flam Man, The''. 1967. Produced by Lawrence Turman; directed by Irvin Kershner and Yakima Canutt. Twentieth Century Fox. | |||
* ''Grifters, The''. 1991. Produced by Martin Scorsese; directed by Stephen Frears. Miramax Films. | |||
* ''House of Games''. 1987. Produced by Michael Hausman; directed by David Mamet. Orion. | |||
* ''Matchstick Men''. 2003. | |||
* ''Music Man, The''. 1962. Produced and directed by Morton da Costa. Warner. | |||
* ''Paper Moon''. 1973. Directed and produced by Peter Bogdanovitch. Paramount. | |||
* ''Rainmaker, The.'' 1956. Produced by Paul Nathan. Paramount. | |||
* ''Sting, The''. 1973. Directed by George Roy Hill. Universal. | |||
* ''Spanish Prisoner, The''. 1997. Produced by ??; directed by David Mamet. | |||
* ''The Score''. 2001. Produced by ??; directed by Frank Oz. | |||
* ''Heist''. 2001. Produced by ??; directed by David Mamet. | |||
* ''Confidence''. 2003. Produced by ??; directed by James Foley. | |||
==Stages== | |||
==Confidence tricks in literature== | |||
In ''Confessions of a Confidence Man'', Edward H. Smith lists the "six definite steps or stages of growth" of a confidence game.<ref name="smith">{{cite book |first=Edward H. |last=Smith |title=Confessions of a Confidence Man: A Handbook for Suckers |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=Cyq8QAAACAAJ |year=1923 |publisher=Scientific American Publishing |pages=35–37 |access-date=2015-11-07 |archive-date=2023-01-15 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20230115101905/https://books.google.com/books?id=Cyq8QAAACAAJ |url-status=live }}</ref> He notes that some steps may be omitted. It is also possible some can be done in a different order than below, or carried out simultaneously. | |||
''(very incomplete)'' | |||
* Many of the crime novels of ] involve confidence artists. | |||
;Foundation work | |||
* ]'s ''My Heart Laid Bare'' features a family of confidence artists. | |||
:Preparations are made in advance of the game, including the hiring of any assistants required and studying the background knowledge needed for the role. | |||
* ]'s ''American Gods'' uses a ] as a major plot element. | |||
;Approach | |||
:The victim is approached or contacted. | |||
;Build-up | |||
:The victim is given an opportunity to profit from participating in a scheme. The victim's greed is encouraged, such that their rational judgment of the situation might be impaired. | |||
;Pay-off or convincer | |||
:The victim receives a small payout as a demonstration of the scheme's purported effectiveness. This may be a real amount of money or faked in some way (including physically or electronically). In a ] con, the victim is allowed to win several small bets. In a ] con, the victim is given fake ]s. | |||
;The "hurrah" | |||
:A sudden manufactured crisis or change of events forces the victim to act or make a decision immediately. This is the point at which the con succeeds or fails. With a financial scam, the con artist may tell the victim that the "window of opportunity" to make a large investment in the scheme is about to suddenly close forever. | |||
;The in-and-in | |||
:A conspirator (in on the con, but assumes the role of an interested bystander) puts an amount of money into the same scheme as the victim, to add an appearance of legitimacy. This can reassure the victim, and give the con man greater control when the deal has been completed. | |||
In addition, some games require a "]" step, particularly those involving a fake, but purportedly "rare item" of "great value". This usually includes the use of an accomplice who plays the part of an uninvolved (initially skeptical) third party, who later confirms the claims made by the con man.<ref name="smith"/> | |||
=== In a Long Con === | |||
Alternatively, in ''The Big Con'', David Maurer writes that all cons "progress through certain fundamental stages" and that there are ten stages for a "''big con''."<ref name=":0">{{Harvnb|Maurer|1999|loc=Ch. 1. A Word About Confidence Men}}</ref> | |||
# Locating and investigating a well-to-do victim. (Putting the mark up.) | |||
# Gaining the victim’s confidence. (Playing the con for him.) | |||
# Steering him to meet the insideman. (Roping the mark.) | |||
# Permitting the insideman to show him how he can make a large amount of money dishonestly. (Telling him the tale.) | |||
# Allowing the victim to make a substantial profit. (Giving him the convincer.) | |||
# Determining exactly how much he will invest. (Giving him the breakdown.) | |||
# Sending him home for this amount of money. (Putting him on the send.) | |||
# Playing him against a big store and fleecing him. (Taking off the touch.) | |||
# Getting him out of the way as quietly as possible. (Blowing him off.) | |||
# Forestalling action by the law. (Putting in the fix.) | |||
==Vulnerability factors== | |||
Confidence tricks exploit characteristics such as ],<ref name=":0" /> ], ], ], ], ], ], ], ], and ]. As such, there is no consistent profile of a confidence trick victim; the common factor is simply that the victim relies on the good faith of the con artist. Victims of ] tend to show an incautious level of greed and gullibility, and many con artists target the elderly and other people thought to be vulnerable, using various forms of confidence tricks.<ref> {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070415230029/http://www.crimes-of-persuasion.com/Victims/victims.htm |date=2007-04-15 }} ''Fraud Victim Advice / Assistance for Consumer Scams and Investment Frauds''</ref> Researchers Huang and Orbach argue:<ref name=Huang18/> | |||
{{blockquote|Cons succeed for inducing judgment errors—chiefly, errors arising from ] and ]es. In popular culture and among professional con men, the human vulnerabilities that cons exploit are depicted as "dishonesty", "greed", and "gullibility" of the marks. Dishonesty, often represented by the expression "you can't cheat an honest man", refers to the willingness of marks to participate in unlawful acts, such as rigged gambling and embezzlement. Greed, the desire to "get something for nothing", is a shorthand expression of marks' beliefs that too-good-to-be-true gains are realistic. Gullibility reflects beliefs that marks are "suckers" and "fools" for entering into costly voluntary exchanges. Judicial opinions occasionally echo these sentiments.}} | |||
== Online fraud == | |||
{{see also|Internet fraud}} | |||
Fraud has rapidly adapted to the Internet. The ] (IC3) of the ] received 847,376 reports in 2021 with a reported loss of money of $6.9 billion in the US alone.<ref>{{Cite web |title=Internet Crime Report, 2021 |url=https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2021_IC3Report.pdf |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220322182942/https://www.ic3.gov/Media/PDF/AnnualReport/2021_IC3Report.pdf |archive-date=2022-03-22 |url-status=live |website=Internet Crime Complaint Center, FBI}}</ref> The Global Anti Scam Alliance annual Global State of Scam Report, stated that globally $47.8 billion was lost and the number of reported scams increased from 139 million in 2019 to 266 million in 2020.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Greening |first=James |date=2021-12-07 |title=Scammers are Winning: € 41.3 ($ 47.8) Billion lost in Scams, up 15% |url=https://www.gasa.org/post/scammers-are-winning-41-3-47-8-billion-lost-in-scams-up-15 |access-date=2022-05-19 |website=GASA |language=en |archive-date=2022-05-17 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20220517001559/https://www.gasa.org/post/scammers-are-winning-41-3-47-8-billion-lost-in-scams-up-15 |url-status=live }}</ref> | |||
Government organizations have set up online fraud reporting websites to build awareness about online scams and help victims make reporting of online fraud easier. Examples are in the United States (] ], ]), Australia (ScamWatch ]), Singapore (ScamAlert<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.scamalert.sg/|title=ScamAlert - Bringing you the latest scam info|website=Default|accessdate=May 3, 2023}}</ref>), United Kingdom (]), Netherlands (FraudeHelpdesk<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.fraudehelpdesk.nl/|title=Home|website=www.fraudehelpdesk.nl|accessdate=May 3, 2023}}</ref>). In addition, several private, non-profit initiatives have been set up to combat online fraud like ] (2004), ] (2004) and ScamAdviser (2012). | |||
==See also==<!-- Please respect alphabetical order --> | |||
{{Columns-list|colwidth=30em| | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* '']'' (novel) – fictional religious cons | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ]s | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
* ] | |||
}} | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{Reflist}} | |||
* Maurer, David W. 1940. ''The Big Con: The Story of the Confidence Man and the Confidence Game.'' New York: The Bobbs Merrill company. | |||
* Maurer, David W. 1974. ''The American Confidence Man.'' Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher. | |||
==Further reading== | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Bell |first=J. Bowyer |author2=Whaley, Barton |year=1982 |title=Cheating and Deception (reprint 1991) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=ojmwSoW8g7IC |publisher=Transaction Publishers |isbn=978-0887388682}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Blundell |first=Nigel |orig-year=1982 |title=The World's Greatest Crooks and Conmen and other mischievous malefactors |publisher=Octopus Books |year=1984 |isbn=978-0706421446}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Dillon |first=Eamon |orig-year=2008 |title=The Fraudsters: Sharks and Charlatans – How Con Artists Make Their Money |publisher=Merlin Publishing |year=2008 |isbn=978-1903582824}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Ford |first=Charles V. |orig-year=1999 |title=Lies! Lies!! Lies!!!: The Psychology of Deceit |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=_FSc5C2bFYUC |publisher=American Psychiatric |year=1999 |isbn=978-0880489973}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Henderson |first=Les |title=Crimes of Persuasion: Schemes, scams, frauds |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=-aJ8d_oewg8C |publisher=Coyote Ridge |year=2000 |isbn=978-0968713303}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Kaminski |first=Marek M. |year=2004 |title=Games Prisoners Play |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YIGzIaNmokgC |location=Princeton |publisher=Princeton University Press |isbn=978-0691117218}} | |||
* {{Cite book|title=The Confidence Game: Why We Fall for It...Every Time |last=Konnikova |first=Maria |year=2016 |publisher=Viking |isbn=978-0525427414 }} | |||
* {{Cite book|author1=Lazaroff, Steven |author2=Rodger, Mark |orig-year=2018 |title=History's Greatest Deceptions and Confidence scams |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=pf_NtQEACAAJ |publisher=Rodger & Laz Publishing S.E.N.C. |year=2018 |isbn=978-1775292128}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Maurer |first=David W. |orig-year=1940 |year=1999 |title=The Big Con: The Story of the Confidence Man and the Confidence Game |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=jxbbV5x66usC |publisher=Bobbs Merrill / Anchor Books |isbn=978-0385495387 }} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Maurer |first=David W. |year=1974 |title=The American Confidence Man |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=W6twAAAACAAJ |location=Springfield |publisher=Charles C. Thomas, Publisher |isbn=978-0398029746}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Reading |first=Amy |year=2012 |title=The Mark Inside: A Perfect Swindle, a Cunning Revenge, and a Small History of the Big Con |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=skV3BGg-znYC |publisher=Knopf |isbn=978-0307473592 }} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Smith |first=Jeff |year=2009 |title=Soapy Smith: The Life and Death of a Scoundrel |url=http://www.soapysmith.net/id50.html |publisher=Klondike Research |location=Juneau |isbn=978-0981974309}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Sutherland |first=Edwin Hardin |year=1937 |title=The Professional Thief (reprint 1989) |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=muZuPt327pwC |publisher=University of Chicago Press |isbn=978-0226780511}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Weil |first=J.R. "Yellow Kid" |year=1948 |orig-year=2004 |title=Con Man: A Master Swindler's Own Story |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=wScQOATAjMMC&q=con+man+yellow+kid+weil |publisher=Broadway Books|isbn=978-0767917377}} | |||
* {{Cite book|last=Zhang |first=Yingyu |year=2017 |title=The Book of Swindles: Selections from a Late Ming Collection |url=https://cup.columbia.edu/book/the-book-of-swindles/9780231178631 |publisher=Columbia University Press |isbn=978-0231178631}} | |||
==External links== | |||
* {{Wikivoyage inline}} | |||
* {{Commons category-inline}} | |||
* {{cite web |website= The Lost Museum, (]) |url= https://lostmuseum.cuny.edu/archive/arrest-of-the-confidence-man-newyork-herald |title= Arrest of the Confidence Man |publisher= ] |series= Police Intelligence |date= July 8, 1849 }} | |||
* {{cite web<!--Deny Citation Bot-->|url=http://www.chinafile.com/library/books/book-of-swindles|website=ChinaFile|title=Book of Swindles|date=2017-11-15}} Confidence tricks in China. | |||
* {{cite web|url=https://www.fbi.gov/news/stories/prepaid-funeral-scam|website=FBI.gov|title=Prepaid funeral scam}} | |||
* {{cite news|url=http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17697615/|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070324001555/http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17697615 |url-status=dead|archive-date=2007-03-24|work=] investigation |title=To Catch a Con Man}} | |||
{{fraud}} | |||
{{Corruption}} | |||
{{Manipulation (psychology)}} | |||
{{Scams and confidence tricks}} | |||
{{Authority control}} | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] | |||
] |
Latest revision as of 16:58, 8 January 2025
Attempt to defraud a person or group Several terms redirect here. For the 2016 film, see Confidence Game. For counterfeits, see Counterfeit consumer goods. For other uses, see Con Man, Con artist (disambiguation) and Scam (disambiguation).
A scam, or a confidence trick, is an attempt to defraud a person or group after first gaining their trust. Confidence tricks exploit victims using a combination of the victim's credulity, naivety, compassion, vanity, confidence, irresponsibility, and greed. Researchers have defined confidence tricks as "a distinctive species of fraudulent conduct ... intending to further voluntary exchanges that are not mutually beneficial", as they "benefit con operators ('con men') at the expense of their victims (the 'marks')".
Terminology
Other terms for "scam" include confidence trick, con, con game, confidence game, confidence scheme, ripoff, stratagem, finesse, grift, hustle, bunko, bunco, swindle, flimflam, gaffle, and bamboozle.
The perpetrator is often referred to as a scammer, confidence man, con man, con artist, grifter, hustler, or swindler. The intended victims are known as marks, suckers, stooges, mugs, rubes, or gulls (from the word gullible). When accomplices are employed, they are known as shills.
Length
A short con or small con is a fast swindle that takes just minutes, possibly seconds. It typically aims to rob the victim of his money or other valuables that they carry on their person or are guarding. A long con or big con (also, chiefly in British English, long game) is a scam that unfolds over several days or weeks; it may involve a team of swindlers, and even props, sets, extras, costumes, and scripted lines. It aims to rob the victim of a huge amount of money or other valuables, often by getting them to empty out banking accounts and borrow from family members.
History
The shell game dates back at least to Ancient Greece. William Thompson (1821–1856) was the original "confidence man". Thompson was a clumsy swindler who asked his victims to express confidence in him by giving him money or their watch rather than gaining their confidence in a more nuanced way. A few people trusted Thompson with their money and watches. Thompson was arrested in July 1849. Reporting on this arrest, James Houston, a reporter for the New York Herald, publicized Thompson by naming him the "Confidence Man". Although Thompson was an unsuccessful scammer, he gained a reputation as a genius operator mostly because Houston's satirical tone was not understood as such. The National Police Gazette coined the term "confidence game" a few weeks after Houston first used the name "confidence man".
Stages
In Confessions of a Confidence Man, Edward H. Smith lists the "six definite steps or stages of growth" of a confidence game. He notes that some steps may be omitted. It is also possible some can be done in a different order than below, or carried out simultaneously.
- Foundation work
- Preparations are made in advance of the game, including the hiring of any assistants required and studying the background knowledge needed for the role.
- Approach
- The victim is approached or contacted.
- Build-up
- The victim is given an opportunity to profit from participating in a scheme. The victim's greed is encouraged, such that their rational judgment of the situation might be impaired.
- Pay-off or convincer
- The victim receives a small payout as a demonstration of the scheme's purported effectiveness. This may be a real amount of money or faked in some way (including physically or electronically). In a gambling con, the victim is allowed to win several small bets. In a stock market con, the victim is given fake dividends.
- The "hurrah"
- A sudden manufactured crisis or change of events forces the victim to act or make a decision immediately. This is the point at which the con succeeds or fails. With a financial scam, the con artist may tell the victim that the "window of opportunity" to make a large investment in the scheme is about to suddenly close forever.
- The in-and-in
- A conspirator (in on the con, but assumes the role of an interested bystander) puts an amount of money into the same scheme as the victim, to add an appearance of legitimacy. This can reassure the victim, and give the con man greater control when the deal has been completed.
In addition, some games require a "corroboration" step, particularly those involving a fake, but purportedly "rare item" of "great value". This usually includes the use of an accomplice who plays the part of an uninvolved (initially skeptical) third party, who later confirms the claims made by the con man.
In a Long Con
Alternatively, in The Big Con, David Maurer writes that all cons "progress through certain fundamental stages" and that there are ten stages for a "big con."
- Locating and investigating a well-to-do victim. (Putting the mark up.)
- Gaining the victim’s confidence. (Playing the con for him.)
- Steering him to meet the insideman. (Roping the mark.)
- Permitting the insideman to show him how he can make a large amount of money dishonestly. (Telling him the tale.)
- Allowing the victim to make a substantial profit. (Giving him the convincer.)
- Determining exactly how much he will invest. (Giving him the breakdown.)
- Sending him home for this amount of money. (Putting him on the send.)
- Playing him against a big store and fleecing him. (Taking off the touch.)
- Getting him out of the way as quietly as possible. (Blowing him off.)
- Forestalling action by the law. (Putting in the fix.)
Vulnerability factors
Confidence tricks exploit characteristics such as greed, dishonesty, vanity, opportunism, lust, compassion, credulity, irresponsibility, desperation, and naïvety. As such, there is no consistent profile of a confidence trick victim; the common factor is simply that the victim relies on the good faith of the con artist. Victims of investment scams tend to show an incautious level of greed and gullibility, and many con artists target the elderly and other people thought to be vulnerable, using various forms of confidence tricks. Researchers Huang and Orbach argue:
Cons succeed for inducing judgment errors—chiefly, errors arising from imperfect information and cognitive biases. In popular culture and among professional con men, the human vulnerabilities that cons exploit are depicted as "dishonesty", "greed", and "gullibility" of the marks. Dishonesty, often represented by the expression "you can't cheat an honest man", refers to the willingness of marks to participate in unlawful acts, such as rigged gambling and embezzlement. Greed, the desire to "get something for nothing", is a shorthand expression of marks' beliefs that too-good-to-be-true gains are realistic. Gullibility reflects beliefs that marks are "suckers" and "fools" for entering into costly voluntary exchanges. Judicial opinions occasionally echo these sentiments.
Online fraud
See also: Internet fraudFraud has rapidly adapted to the Internet. The Internet Crime Complaint Center (IC3) of the FBI received 847,376 reports in 2021 with a reported loss of money of $6.9 billion in the US alone. The Global Anti Scam Alliance annual Global State of Scam Report, stated that globally $47.8 billion was lost and the number of reported scams increased from 139 million in 2019 to 266 million in 2020.
Government organizations have set up online fraud reporting websites to build awareness about online scams and help victims make reporting of online fraud easier. Examples are in the United States (FBI IC3, Federal Trade Commission), Australia (ScamWatch ACCC), Singapore (ScamAlert), United Kingdom (ActionFraud), Netherlands (FraudeHelpdesk). In addition, several private, non-profit initiatives have been set up to combat online fraud like AA419 (2004), APWG (2004) and ScamAdviser (2012).
See also
- Advance-fee scam
- Badger game
- Boiler room (business)
- Catfishing
- Charlatan
- Confidence tricks in literature
- Confidence tricks in film and television
- Counterfeit
- Elmer Gantry (novel) – fictional religious cons
- Gaslighting
- Graft
- Hijacked journals
- List of con artists
- List of scams
- Phishing
- Quackery
- Racketeering
- Ripoff
- Scam baiting
- Scams in intellectual property
- Social engineering (security)
- SSA impersonation scam
- Technical support scam
- White-collar crime
References
- ^ Huang, Lindsey; Orbach, Barak (2018). "Con Men and Their Enablers: The Anatomy of Confidence Games". Social Research: An International Quarterly. 85 (4): 795–822. doi:10.1353/sor.2018.0050. S2CID 150021652. Archived from the original on 2023-01-15. Retrieved 2018-09-03.
- Maurer 1999, Ch. 8. Short-Con Games
- Yagoda, Ben (June 5, 2012). "The long game". Not One-off Britishisms. Archived from the original on July 7, 2014. This language blog, while not a reliable etymological source, provides statistically gathered usage data that demonstrates neutral as well as critical usage, and that it is of British origin, only recently making notable inroads into American English.
- Reading 2012, Ch. 1. Confidence
- "Shell Game". Archived from the original on 2011-07-14.
- ^ Braucher, Jean; Orbach, Barak (2015). "Scamming: The Misunderstood Confidence Man". Yale Journal of Law & the Humanities. 72 (2): 249–292. doi:10.2139/ssrn.2314071. S2CID 148270133.
- ^ Smith, Edward H. (1923). Confessions of a Confidence Man: A Handbook for Suckers. Scientific American Publishing. pp. 35–37. Archived from the original on 2023-01-15. Retrieved 2015-11-07.
- ^ Maurer 1999, Ch. 1. A Word About Confidence Men
- Crimes-of-persuasion.com Archived 2007-04-15 at the Wayback Machine Fraud Victim Advice / Assistance for Consumer Scams and Investment Frauds
- "Internet Crime Report, 2021" (PDF). Internet Crime Complaint Center, FBI. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2022-03-22.
- Greening, James (2021-12-07). "Scammers are Winning: € 41.3 ($ 47.8) Billion lost in Scams, up 15%". GASA. Archived from the original on 2022-05-17. Retrieved 2022-05-19.
- "ScamAlert - Bringing you the latest scam info". Default. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
- "Home". www.fraudehelpdesk.nl. Retrieved May 3, 2023.
Further reading
- Bell, J. Bowyer; Whaley, Barton (1982). Cheating and Deception (reprint 1991). Transaction Publishers. ISBN 978-0887388682.
- Blundell, Nigel (1984) . The World's Greatest Crooks and Conmen and other mischievous malefactors. Octopus Books. ISBN 978-0706421446.
- Dillon, Eamon (2008) . The Fraudsters: Sharks and Charlatans – How Con Artists Make Their Money. Merlin Publishing. ISBN 978-1903582824.
- Ford, Charles V. (1999) . Lies! Lies!! Lies!!!: The Psychology of Deceit. American Psychiatric. ISBN 978-0880489973.
- Henderson, Les (2000). Crimes of Persuasion: Schemes, scams, frauds. Coyote Ridge. ISBN 978-0968713303.
- Kaminski, Marek M. (2004). Games Prisoners Play. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0691117218.
- Konnikova, Maria (2016). The Confidence Game: Why We Fall for It...Every Time. Viking. ISBN 978-0525427414.
- Lazaroff, Steven; Rodger, Mark (2018) . History's Greatest Deceptions and Confidence scams. Rodger & Laz Publishing S.E.N.C. ISBN 978-1775292128.
- Maurer, David W. (1999) . The Big Con: The Story of the Confidence Man and the Confidence Game. Bobbs Merrill / Anchor Books. ISBN 978-0385495387.
- Maurer, David W. (1974). The American Confidence Man. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas, Publisher. ISBN 978-0398029746.
- Reading, Amy (2012). The Mark Inside: A Perfect Swindle, a Cunning Revenge, and a Small History of the Big Con. Knopf. ISBN 978-0307473592.
- Smith, Jeff (2009). Soapy Smith: The Life and Death of a Scoundrel. Juneau: Klondike Research. ISBN 978-0981974309.
- Sutherland, Edwin Hardin (1937). The Professional Thief (reprint 1989). University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0226780511.
- Weil, J.R. "Yellow Kid" (1948) . Con Man: A Master Swindler's Own Story. Broadway Books. ISBN 978-0767917377.
- Zhang, Yingyu (2017). The Book of Swindles: Selections from a Late Ming Collection. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0231178631.
External links
- Scam travel guide from Wikivoyage
- Media related to Confidence tricks at Wikimedia Commons
- "Arrest of the Confidence Man". The Lost Museum, (GMU). Police Intelligence. New York Herald. July 8, 1849.
- "Book of Swindles". ChinaFile. 2017-11-15. Confidence tricks in China.
- "Prepaid funeral scam". FBI.gov.
- "To Catch a Con Man". Dateline NBC investigation. Archived from the original on 2007-03-24.
Types of fraud | |
---|---|
Business-related | |
Family-related | |
Financial-related | |
Government-related | |
Other types | |
Manipulation (psychology) | |
---|---|
Positive manipulation | |
Negative manipulation | |
Other manipulation | |
Related manipulation topics |
Scams and confidence tricks | |
---|---|
Terminology | |
Variants |
|
Internet scams and countermeasures |
|
Pyramid and Ponzi schemes |
|
Lists |