Misplaced Pages

Kitsch: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:45, 3 January 2023 editBeyond My Ken (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers263,451 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit← Previous edit Latest revision as of 23:15, 8 January 2025 edit undoRasptae (talk | contribs)31 edits I've changed the pronunciation of the termTags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit 
(38 intermediate revisions by 26 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{short description|Art or other objects that appeal to popular rather than high art tastes}}
{{italic title}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=August 2020}} {{Use dmy dates|date=August 2020}}
{{About|the art term}} {{About|the art term}}
{{hatnote group|
{{Redirect|Tacky|the physical property|Sticky (disambiguation){{!}}Sticky|the Weird Al song|Tacky (song)}}
{{Redirect|Kitch|the calypsonian|Lord Kitchener (calypsonian)}} {{Redirect|Tacky|other uses|Adhesive|and|Tacky (song)}}
}}
{{Redirect|Kich|radio station|KICH (AM)}}
{{short description|Art or other objects that appeal to popular rather than high art tastes}}
{{Expand Portuguese|date=January 2020}}
]'' painting by ], is a common example of modern kitsch.]] ]'' painting by ], is a common example of modern kitsch.]]
] ] (2010) is a self-aware display of kitsch, specifically as a combination of opulence and cuteness.]]

'''Kitsch''' ({{IPAc-en|k|ɪ|tʃ}} {{Respell|KITCH}}; ] from German){{efn|Despite being a direct borrowing from modern German, kitsch is most often left uncapitalized and without ] (cf. ], '']''). Pronunciation may also be colloquially realized as {{IPAc-en|k|ɪ|ʃ}} {{Respell|KISH}}.}}<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kitsch|title=Definition of KITSCH|website=www.merriam-webster.com}}</ref> is a term applied to art and design that is perceived as ] imitation, overly-eccentric, gratuitous, or of banal ].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|author-link=Theodor W. Adorno|author-link2=Max Horkheimer|date=2002|title=Dialectic of Enlightenment - Philosophical Fragments|url=http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~randall/Readings%20W2/Horkheimer_Max_Adorno_Theodor_W_Dialectic_of_Enlightenment_Philosophical_Fragments.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170614021407/http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~randall/Readings%20W2/Horkheimer_Max_Adorno_Theodor_W_Dialectic_of_Enlightenment_Philosophical_Fragments.pdf|archive-date=14 June 2017|access-date=22 October 2021|website=Wayback Machine Internet Archive}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|last=Dutton|first=Denis|title=Kitsch|date=2003|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t046768|work=Oxford Art Online|publisher=Oxford University Press|doi=10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t046768|access-date=2021-10-22}}</ref> '''''Kitsch''''' ({{IPAc-en|k|ɪ|tʃ}} {{Respell|KICH}}; ] from German){{efn|Despite being a direct borrowing from modern German, kitsch is most often left uncapitalized and without ] (cf. ], '']''). Pronunciation may also be colloquially realized as {{IPAc-en|k|ɪ|ʃ}} {{Respell|KISH}}.}}<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/kitsch|title=Definition of KITSCH|website=www.merriam-webster.com}}</ref> is a term applied to art and design that is perceived as ] imitation, overly eccentric, gratuitous or of banal ].<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|author-link=Theodor W. Adorno|author-link2=Max Horkheimer|date=2002|title=Dialectic of Enlightenment - Philosophical Fragments|url=http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~randall/Readings%20W2/Horkheimer_Max_Adorno_Theodor_W_Dialectic_of_Enlightenment_Philosophical_Fragments.pdf|url-status=live|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170614021407/http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~randall/Readings%20W2/Horkheimer_Max_Adorno_Theodor_W_Dialectic_of_Enlightenment_Philosophical_Fragments.pdf|archive-date=14 June 2017|access-date=22 October 2021|website=Wayback Machine Internet Archive}}</ref><ref>{{Citation|last=Dutton|first=Denis|title=Kitsch|date=2003|url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t046768|work=Oxford Art Online|publisher=Oxford University Press|doi=10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t046768|access-date=2021-10-22}}</ref>


The ] opposed kitsch as ] and superficial affiliation with the ] and its natural standards of ]. In the first half of the 20th century, kitsch referred to products of ] that lacked the depth of ]. However, since the emergence of ] in the 1950s, kitsch is sometimes re-appreciated in knowingly ], humorous or ] fashion. The modern ] traditionally opposed kitsch for its ] tendencies, its superficial relationship with the ] and its naturalistic standards of ]. In the first half of the 20th century, kitsch was used in reference to mass-produced, ] products that lacked the conceptual depth of ]. However, since the emergence of ] in the 1950s, kitsch has taken on newfound highbrow appeal, often wielded in knowingly ], humorous or ] manners.


To brand visual art as "kitsch" is often still ], though not exclusively. Art deemed kitsch may be enjoyed in an entirely positive and ] manner. For example, it carries the ability to be quaint or "quirky" without being offensive on the surface, as in the '']'' paintings. To brand visual art as "kitsch" is often still ], though not exclusively. Art deemed kitsch may be enjoyed in an entirely positive and ] manner. For example, it carries the ability to be quaint or "quirky" without being offensive on the surface, as in the '']'' paintings.


Kitsch can refer to ], ], or any work, and relates to ], as they both incorporate irony and extravagance.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Scruton|first1=Roger|author-link1=Roger Scruton|date=21 February 2014|title=A fine line between art and kitsch|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerscruton/2014/02/21/a-fine-line-between-art-and-kitsch/#7fbd667e3679|website=Forbes|access-date=16 January 2017}}</ref> Along with visual art, the quality of kitsch can be used to describe works of ], ] or any other creative medium. Kitsch relates to ], as they both incorporate irony and extravagance.<ref>{{cite web|last1=Scruton|first1=Roger|author-link1=Roger Scruton|date=21 February 2014|title=A fine line between art and kitsch|url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/rogerscruton/2014/02/21/a-fine-line-between-art-and-kitsch/#7fbd667e3679|website=Forbes|access-date=16 January 2017}}</ref>


==History== ==History==
{{Expand section|date=January 2019}} {{Expand section|date=January 2019}}
] ] and milk jug set, themed like an old ]]] ] ] and milk jug set, themed after an old ]]]
] ]
] in Poland, as an example of kitsch in sacred architecture]]
As a descriptive term, ''kitsch'' originated in the art markets of ], Germany in the 1860s and the 1870s, describing cheap, popular, and marketable pictures and sketches.<ref>Calinescu, Matei. Five Faces of Modernity. Kitsch, p.&nbsp;234.</ref> In ''Das Buch vom Kitsch'' (''The Book of Kitsch''), published in 1936, ] defined it as a professional expression "born in a painter's studio". As a descriptive term, ''kitsch'' originated in the art markets of ], Germany in the 1860s and the 1870s, describing cheap, popular, and marketable pictures and sketches.<ref>Calinescu, Matei. Five Faces of Modernity. Kitsch, p.&nbsp;234.</ref> In ''Das Buch vom Kitsch'' (''The Book of Kitsch''), published in 1936, ] defined it as a professional expression "born in a painter's studio".


The study of kitsch was done almost exclusively in German until the 1970s, with ] being an important scholar in the field.<ref name="menninghaus">{{cite book |last=Menninghaus |first=Winfried |title=Walter Benjamin and the Architecture of Modernity |publisher=re.press |others= |year=2009 |isbn=9780980544091 |editor=Andrew Benjamin and Charles Rice |pages=39–58 |chapter=On the Vital Significance of 'Kitsch': Walter Benjamin's Politics of 'Bad Taste' |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UFx1D_BC5tsC&pg=PA40}}</ref> The study of kitsch was done almost exclusively in Germany until the 1970s, with ] being an important scholar in the field.<ref name="menninghaus">{{cite book |last=Menninghaus |first=Winfried |title=Walter Benjamin and the Architecture of Modernity |publisher=re.press |year=2009 |isbn=9780980544091 |editor=Andrew Benjamin and Charles Rice |pages=39–58 |chapter=On the Vital Significance of 'Kitsch': Walter Benjamin's Politics of 'Bad Taste' |chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=UFx1D_BC5tsC&pg=PA40}}</ref>


Kitsch is regarded as a modern phenomenon, coinciding with social changes in recent centuries such as the ], ], mass production, modern materials and media such as ]s, ] and ], the rise of the ] and ]{{emdash}}all of which have factored into a perception of oversaturation of art produced for the popular taste. Kitsch is regarded as a modern phenomenon, coinciding with social changes in recent centuries such as the ], ], mass production, modern materials and media such as ]s, ] and ], the rise of the ] and ]{{emdash}}all of which have factored into a perception of oversaturation of art produced for the popular taste.
Line 36: Line 38:
# Kitsch depicts a beautiful or highly emotionally charged subject; # Kitsch depicts a beautiful or highly emotionally charged subject;
# The depicted subject is instantly and effortlessly identifiable; # The depicted subject is instantly and effortlessly identifiable;
# Kitsch does not substantially enrich our associations related to the depicted subject.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Kitsch and art|last=Tomas|first=Kulka|publisher=Pennsylvania State Univ. Press|year=1996|isbn=978-0271015941|oclc=837730812}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Kulka|first=Tomas|date=1 January 1988|title=KITSCH|journal=The British Journal of Aesthetics|volume=28|issue=1|pages=18–27|doi=10.1093/bjaesthetics/28.1.18|issn=0007-0904}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal|last=Higgins|first=Kathleen Marie|date=1 January 1998|title=Review of Kitsch and Art|journal=The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism|volume=56|issue=4|pages=410–412|doi=10.2307/432137|jstor=432137}}</ref> # Kitsch does not substantially enrich our associations related to the depicted subject.<ref>{{Cite book|title=Kitsch and art|last=Tomas|first=Kulka|publisher=Pennsylvania State Univ. Press|year=1996|isbn=978-0271015941|oclc=837730812}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | last=Higgins | first=Kathleen Marie | last2=Kulka | first2=Tomas | title=Kitsch and Art | journal=The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism | publisher=JSTOR | volume=56 | issue=4 | year=1998 | issn=0021-8529 | doi=10.2307/432137 | jstor=432137 | page=410}}</ref>


===Kitsch in Milan Kundera's ''The Unbearable Lightness of Being''=== ===Kitsch in Milan Kundera's ''The Unbearable Lightness of Being''===
Line 42: Line 44:
The concept of kitsch is a central motif in ] 1984 novel '']''. Towards the end of the novel, the book's narrator posits that the act of defecation (and specifically, the shame that surrounds it) poses a metaphysical challenge to the theory of divine creation: "Either/or: either shit is acceptable (in which case don't lock yourself in the bathroom!) or we are created in an unacceptable manner".<ref>Kundera, Milan (1984). ''The Unbearable Lightness of Being''. Harper Perennial. p. 248</ref> Thus, in order for us to continue to believe in the essential propriety and rightness of the universe (what the narrator calls "the categorical agreement with being"), we live in a world "in which shit is denied and everyone acts as though it did not exist". For Kundera's narrator, this is the definition of kitsch: an "aesthetic ideal" which "excludes everything from its purview which is essentially unacceptable in human existence". The concept of kitsch is a central motif in ] 1984 novel '']''. Towards the end of the novel, the book's narrator posits that the act of defecation (and specifically, the shame that surrounds it) poses a metaphysical challenge to the theory of divine creation: "Either/or: either shit is acceptable (in which case don't lock yourself in the bathroom!) or we are created in an unacceptable manner".<ref>Kundera, Milan (1984). ''The Unbearable Lightness of Being''. Harper Perennial. p. 248</ref> Thus, in order for us to continue to believe in the essential propriety and rightness of the universe (what the narrator calls "the categorical agreement with being"), we live in a world "in which shit is denied and everyone acts as though it did not exist". For Kundera's narrator, this is the definition of kitsch: an "aesthetic ideal" which "excludes everything from its purview which is essentially unacceptable in human existence".


The novel goes on to relate this definition of kitsch to politics, and specifically — given the novel's setting in ] around the time of the ] — to ] and ]. He gives the example of the Communist ] ceremony, and of the sight of children running on the grass and the feeling this is supposed to provoke. This emphasis on feeling is fundamental to how kitsch operates: The novel goes on to relate this definition of kitsch to politics, and specifically—given the novel's setting in ] around the time of the ]—to ] and ]. He gives the example of the Communist ] ceremony, and of the sight of children running on the grass and the feeling this is supposed to provoke. This emphasis on feeling is fundamental to how kitsch operates:


<blockquote>Kitsch causes two tears to flow in quick succession. The first tear says: How nice to see children running on the grass! The second tear says: How nice to be moved, together with all mankind, by children running on the grass! It is the second tear that makes kitsch kitsch.<ref name="auto1">Kundera, Milan (1984). ''The Unbearable Lightness of Being''. Harper Perennial. p. 251</ref></blockquote> <blockquote>Kitsch causes two tears to flow in quick succession. The first tear says: How nice to see children running on the grass! The second tear says: How nice to be moved, together with all mankind, by children running on the grass! It is the second tear that makes kitsch kitsch.<ref name="auto1">Kundera, Milan (1984). ''The Unbearable Lightness of Being''. Harper Perennial. p. 251</ref></blockquote>
Line 65: Line 67:
Thus, for Olalquiaga, melancholic kitsch is able to function as a Benjaminian dialectical image: "an object whose decayed state exposes and reflects its utopian possibilities, a remnant constantly reliving its own death, a ruin".<ref name="auto"/> Thus, for Olalquiaga, melancholic kitsch is able to function as a Benjaminian dialectical image: "an object whose decayed state exposes and reflects its utopian possibilities, a remnant constantly reliving its own death, a ruin".<ref name="auto"/>


==Uses== ==Further usage==

===Art===
===Historical fiction===
Jewish-American author ] coined the term "]" to describe mass-market, overly sentimental depictions of ] from the end of the ] onwards, including works inspired by his own graphic novel on the subject, '']''. The term is usually used to criticize works seen as relying on ] and mass recognition to commercialize the experiences of ], such as '']'' or '']'', but also includes more positively received works like Polanski's '']''.<ref>Audi, Anthony. ''Literary Hub'', 22 March 2017. Retrieved 7 July 2024.</ref><ref>Bourne, Michael. , ''The Millions'', 22 November 2011. Retrieved 7 July 2024.</ref><ref>Corliss, Richard. , ''Time'', 1 January, 2009. Retrieved 7 July 2024.</ref>

===Reclamation===
The ] is an international movement of classical painters, founded{{clarify|Sources indicate that this was more of an aestethic statement than the founding of a movement|date=September 2014}} in 1998 upon a philosophy proposed by ],<ref>E.J. Pettinger {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120407050738/http://www.boiseweekly.com/boise/the-kitsch-campaign/Content?oid=926148|date=7 April 2012}} "The Kitsch Campaign" , 29 December 2004.</ref> which he clarified in his 2001 book ''On Kitsch'',<ref>Dag Solhjell and Odd Nerdrum. ''On Kitsch'', Kagge Publishing, August 2001, {{ISBN|8248901238}}.</ref> in cooperation with Jan-Ove Tuv and others incorporating the techniques of the ]s with narrative, ], and emotionally charged imagery. The ] is an international movement of classical painters, founded{{clarify|Sources indicate that this was more of an aestethic statement than the founding of a movement|date=September 2014}} in 1998 upon a philosophy proposed by ],<ref>E.J. Pettinger {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20120407050738/http://www.boiseweekly.com/boise/the-kitsch-campaign/Content?oid=926148|date=7 April 2012}} "The Kitsch Campaign" , 29 December 2004.</ref> which he clarified in his 2001 book ''On Kitsch'',<ref>Dag Solhjell and Odd Nerdrum. ''On Kitsch'', Kagge Publishing, August 2001, {{ISBN|8248901238}}.</ref> in cooperation with Jan-Ove Tuv and others incorporating the techniques of the ]s with narrative, ], and emotionally charged imagery.


==See also== ==See also==
*{{annotated link|Camp (style)|Camp}}
*] - Another American painter whose works are described as kitsch.
*{{annotated link|Chocolate box art}}
*{{annotated link|Cliché}} *{{annotated link|Cliché}}
*{{annotated link|Lowbrow (art movement)}} *{{annotated link|Lowbrow (art movement)}}
*{{annotated link|Museum of Bad Art}} *{{annotated link|Museum of Bad Art}}
*{{annotated link|Poshlost}} *{{annotated link|Poshlost}}
*]—in ''],'' ] for entertaining Oceania's working class
*{{annotated link|Prolefeed}}
;Notable examples ;Notable examples
*{{annotated link|Velvet Elvis}} *{{annotated link|Velvet Elvis}}
*{{annotated link|Chinese Girl|''Chinese Girl''}} *{{annotated link|Chinese Girl|''Chinese Girl''}}
*{{annotated link|Christmas cards}} *{{annotated link|Christmas cards}}
*{{annotated link|Chocolate box art}}
*{{annotated link|Thomas Kinkade}}


==References == ==References ==
Line 87: Line 92:
{{Notelist}} {{Notelist}}


'''Citations'''
==References==
{{Reflist}} {{Reflist}}


== Bibliography == '''Bibliography'''
* {{cite book | last=Horkheimer | first=Max | last2=Adorno | first2=Theodor W. | editor-last1=Schmid Noerr | editor-first1=Gunzelin | title=Dialectic of enlightenment : philosophical fragments | publication-place=Stanford, California | date=2002 | isbn=978-0-8047-8809-0 | oclc=919087055 | author-link=Max Horkheimer | author-link2=Theodor W. Adorno | translator-last1=Jephcott |translator-first1=Edmund | archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20170614021407/http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~randall/Readings%20W2/Horkheimer_Max_Adorno_Theodor_W_Dialectic_of_Enlightenment_Philosophical_Fragments.pdf | url = http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~randall/Readings%20W2/Horkheimer_Max_Adorno_Theodor_W_Dialectic_of_Enlightenment_Philosophical_Fragments.pdf | archive-date = June 14, 2017}}

* ] and ] (2002). Noerr, Gunzselin Schmid (ed.). (PDF). Translated by Edmund Jephcott. Standford, California: Standford University Press. I] ]. Archived from (PDF) on 22 October 2021. Retrieved 4 August 2016.


==Further reading== '''Further reading'''
* Adorno, Theodor (2001). ''The Culture Industry''. Routledge. {{ISBN|0-415-25380-2}} * Adorno, Theodor (2001). ''The Culture Industry''. Routledge. {{ISBN|0-415-25380-2}}
* ] (2008). "Wabi and Kitsch: Two Japanese Paradigms" in ''Æ: Canadian Aesthetics Journal'' 15. * ] (2008). "Wabi and Kitsch: Two Japanese Paradigms" in ''Æ: Canadian Aesthetics Journal'' 15.
* ] (2019) ''The New Aesthetics of Deculturation: Neoliberalism, Fundamentalism and Kitsch'' (Bloomsbury). Foreword by Olivier Roy. * ] (2019) ''The New Aesthetics of Deculturation: Neoliberalism, Fundamentalism and Kitsch'' (Bloomsbury). Foreword by Olivier Roy.
*Braungart, Wolfgang (2002). "Kitsch. Faszination und Herausforderung des Banalen und Trivialen". Max Niemeyer Verlag. {{ISBN|3-484-32112-1}}/0083-4564. *Braungart, Wolfgang (2002). "Kitsch. Faszination und Herausforderung des Banalen und Trivialen". Max Niemeyer Verlag. {{ISBN|3-484-32112-1}}/0083-4564.
* Cheetham, Mark A (2001). "Kant, Art and Art History: moments of discipline". ]. {{ISBN|0-521-80018-8}}. * ] (2001). "Kant, Art and Art History: moments of discipline". ]. {{ISBN|0-521-80018-8}}.
* Dorfles, Gillo (1969, translated from the 1968 Italian version, ''Il Kitsch''). ''Kitsch: The World of Bad Taste'', Universe Books. LCCN 78-93950 * ] (1969, translated from the 1968 Italian version, ''Il Kitsch''). ''Kitsch: The World of Bad Taste'', Universe Books. LCCN 78-93950
* Elias, Norbert. (1998). "The Kitsch Style and the Age of Kitsch," in J. Goudsblom and S. Mennell (eds) ''The Norbert Elias Reader''. Oxford: ]. * ] (1998). "The Kitsch Style and the Age of Kitsch," in J. Goudsblom and S. Mennell (eds) ''The Norbert Elias Reader''. Oxford: ].
* Gelfert, Hans-Dieter (2000). "Was ist Kitsch?". ] in Göttingen. {{ISBN|3-525-34024-9}}. * Gelfert, Hans-Dieter (2000). "Was ist Kitsch?". ] in Göttingen. {{ISBN|3-525-34024-9}}.
* Giesz, Ludwig (1971). ''Phänomenologie des Kitsches''. 2. vermehrte und verbesserte Auflage München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. . Reprint (1994): Ungekürzte Ausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: ]. {{ISBN|3-596-12034-9}} / {{ISBN|978-3-596-12034-5}}. * Giesz, Ludwig (1971). ''Phänomenologie des Kitsches''. 2. vermehrte und verbesserte Auflage München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag. . Reprint (1994): Ungekürzte Ausgabe. Frankfurt am Main: ]. {{ISBN|3-596-12034-9}} / {{ISBN|978-3-596-12034-5}}.
Line 126: Line 130:
* {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103001119/http://www.artdesigncafe.com/kitsch-1992 |date=3 November 2012 }}. In John Walker's ''Glossary of art, architecture & design since 1945''. * {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121103001119/http://www.artdesigncafe.com/kitsch-1992 |date=3 November 2012 }}. In John Walker's ''Glossary of art, architecture & design since 1945''.
* – essay by Clement Greenberg * – essay by Clement Greenberg
* – essay by Roger Scruton


{{Aesthetics}} {{Aesthetics}}
Line 134: Line 137:
] ]
] ]
]

Latest revision as of 23:15, 8 January 2025

Art or other objects that appeal to popular rather than high art tastes

This article is about the art term. For other uses, see Kitsch (disambiguation). "Tacky" redirects here. For other uses, see Adhesive and Tacky (song).
A Friend in Need, a 1903 Dogs Playing Poker painting by Cassius Marcellus Coolidge, is a common example of modern kitsch.
Puppy by Jeff Koons (2010) is a self-aware display of kitsch, specifically as a combination of opulence and cuteness.

Kitsch (/kɪtʃ/ KICH; loanword from German) is a term applied to art and design that is perceived as naïve imitation, overly eccentric, gratuitous or of banal taste.

The modern avant-garde traditionally opposed kitsch for its melodramatic tendencies, its superficial relationship with the human condition and its naturalistic standards of beauty. In the first half of the 20th century, kitsch was used in reference to mass-produced, pop-cultural products that lacked the conceptual depth of fine art. However, since the emergence of Pop Art in the 1950s, kitsch has taken on newfound highbrow appeal, often wielded in knowingly ironic, humorous or earnest manners.

To brand visual art as "kitsch" is often still pejorative, though not exclusively. Art deemed kitsch may be enjoyed in an entirely positive and sincere manner. For example, it carries the ability to be quaint or "quirky" without being offensive on the surface, as in the Dogs Playing Poker paintings.

Along with visual art, the quality of kitsch can be used to describe works of music, literature or any other creative medium. Kitsch relates to camp, as they both incorporate irony and extravagance.

History

This section needs expansion. You can help by adding to it. (January 2019)
A mass-produced teapot and milk jug set, themed after an old cottage
Examples of kitsch in architecture
Basilica of Licheń in Poland, as an example of kitsch in sacred architecture

As a descriptive term, kitsch originated in the art markets of Munich, Germany in the 1860s and the 1870s, describing cheap, popular, and marketable pictures and sketches. In Das Buch vom Kitsch (The Book of Kitsch), published in 1936, Hans Reimann defined it as a professional expression "born in a painter's studio".

The study of kitsch was done almost exclusively in Germany until the 1970s, with Walter Benjamin being an important scholar in the field.

Kitsch is regarded as a modern phenomenon, coinciding with social changes in recent centuries such as the Industrial Revolution, urbanization, mass production, modern materials and media such as plastics, radio and television, the rise of the middle class and public education—all of which have factored into a perception of oversaturation of art produced for the popular taste.

Analysis

Kitsch in art theory and aesthetics

Modernist writer Hermann Broch argues that the essence of kitsch is imitation: kitsch mimics its immediate predecessor with no regard to ethics—it aims to copy the beautiful, not the good. According to Walter Benjamin, kitsch, unlike art, is a utilitarian object lacking all critical distance between object and observer. According to critic Winfried Menninghaus, Benjamin's stance was that kitsch "offers instantaneous emotional gratification without intellectual effort, without the requirement of distance, without sublimation". In a short essay from 1927, Benjamin observed that an artist who engages in kitschy reproductions of things and ideas from a bygone age deserved to be called a "furnished man" (in the way that someone rents a "furnished apartment" where everything is already supplied).

Kitsch is less about the thing observed than about the observer. According to Roger Scruton, "Kitsch is fake art, expressing fake emotions, whose purpose is to deceive the consumer into thinking he feels something deep and serious."

Tomáš Kulka, in Kitsch and Art, starts from two basic facts that kitsch "has an undeniable mass-appeal" and "considered (by the art-educated elite) bad", and then proposes three essential conditions:

  1. Kitsch depicts a beautiful or highly emotionally charged subject;
  2. The depicted subject is instantly and effortlessly identifiable;
  3. Kitsch does not substantially enrich our associations related to the depicted subject.

Kitsch in Milan Kundera's The Unbearable Lightness of Being

The concept of kitsch is a central motif in Milan Kundera's 1984 novel The Unbearable Lightness of Being. Towards the end of the novel, the book's narrator posits that the act of defecation (and specifically, the shame that surrounds it) poses a metaphysical challenge to the theory of divine creation: "Either/or: either shit is acceptable (in which case don't lock yourself in the bathroom!) or we are created in an unacceptable manner". Thus, in order for us to continue to believe in the essential propriety and rightness of the universe (what the narrator calls "the categorical agreement with being"), we live in a world "in which shit is denied and everyone acts as though it did not exist". For Kundera's narrator, this is the definition of kitsch: an "aesthetic ideal" which "excludes everything from its purview which is essentially unacceptable in human existence".

The novel goes on to relate this definition of kitsch to politics, and specifically—given the novel's setting in Prague around the time of the 1968 invasion by the Soviet Union—to communism and totalitarianism. He gives the example of the Communist May Day ceremony, and of the sight of children running on the grass and the feeling this is supposed to provoke. This emphasis on feeling is fundamental to how kitsch operates:

Kitsch causes two tears to flow in quick succession. The first tear says: How nice to see children running on the grass! The second tear says: How nice to be moved, together with all mankind, by children running on the grass! It is the second tear that makes kitsch kitsch.

According to the narrator, kitsch is "the aesthetic ideal of all politicians and all political parties and movements"; however, where a society is dominated by a single political movement, the result is "totalitarian kitsch":

When I say "totalitarian," what I mean is that everything that infringes on kitsch must be banished for life: every display of individualism (because a deviation from the collective is a spit in the eye of the smiling brotherhood); every doubt (because anyone who starts doubting details will end by doubting life itself); all irony (because in the realm of kitsch everything must be taken quite seriously).

Kundera's concept of "totalitarian kitsch" has since been invoked in the study of the art and culture of regimes such as Stalin's Soviet Union, Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy and Iraq under Saddam Hussein. Kundera's narrator ends up condemning kitsch for its "true function" as an ideological tool under such regimes, calling it "a folding screen set up to curtain off death".

Melancholic kitsch vs. nostalgic kitsch

A souvenir snow globe with an underwater motif

In her 1999 book The Artificial Kingdom: A Treasury of the Kitsch Experience, cultural historian Celeste Olalquiaga develops a theory of kitsch that situates its emergence as a specifically nineteenth-century phenomenon, relating it to the feelings of loss elicited by a world transformed by science and industry. Focusing on examples such as paperweights, aquariums, mermaids and the Crystal Palace, Olalquiaga uses Benjamin's concept of the "dialectical image" to argue for the utopian potential of "melancholic kitsch", which she differentiates from the more commonly discussed "nostalgic kitsch".

These two types of kitsch correspond to two different forms of memory. Nostalgic kitsch functions through "reminiscence", which "sacrifices the intensity of experience for a conscious or fabricated sense of continuity":

Incapable of tolerating the intensity of the moment, reminiscence selects and consolidates an event's acceptable parts into a memory perceived as complete. This reconstructed experience is frozen as an emblem of itself, becoming a cultural fossil.

In contrast, melancholic kitsch functions through "remembrance", a form of memory that Olalquiaga links to the "souvenir", which attempts "to repossess the experience of intensity and immediacy through an object". While reminiscence translates a remembered event to the realm of the symbolic ("deprived of immediacy in favour of representational meaning"), remembrance is "the memory of the unconscious", which "sacrific the continuity of time for the intensity of the experience". Far from denying death, melancholic kitsch can only function through a recognition of its multiple "deaths" as a fragmentary remembrance that is subsequently commodified and reproduced. It "glorifies the perishable aspect of events, seeking in their partial and decaying memory the confirmation of its own temporal dislocation".

Thus, for Olalquiaga, melancholic kitsch is able to function as a Benjaminian dialectical image: "an object whose decayed state exposes and reflects its utopian possibilities, a remnant constantly reliving its own death, a ruin".

Further usage

Historical fiction

Jewish-American author Art Spiegelman coined the term "Holo-kitsch" to describe mass-market, overly sentimental depictions of the Holocaust from the end of the Cold War onwards, including works inspired by his own graphic novel on the subject, Maus. The term is usually used to criticize works seen as relying on melodrama and mass recognition to commercialize the experiences of Holocaust survivors, such as Life Is Beautiful or The Boy in the Striped Pajamas, but also includes more positively received works like Polanski's The Pianist.

Reclamation

The Kitsch movement is an international movement of classical painters, founded in 1998 upon a philosophy proposed by Odd Nerdrum, which he clarified in his 2001 book On Kitsch, in cooperation with Jan-Ove Tuv and others incorporating the techniques of the Old Masters with narrative, romanticism, and emotionally charged imagery.

See also

Notable examples
  • Velvet Elvis – Painting of Elvis Presley on velvet
  • Chinese Girl – 1952 painting by Vladimir Tretchikoff
  • Christmas cards – A major type of greeting cardsPages displaying short descriptions of redirect targets
  • Chocolate box art – Term describing idealistic paintings
  • Thomas Kinkade – American painter of popular realistic, bucolic, and idyllic subjects

References

Informational notes

  1. Despite being a direct borrowing from modern German, kitsch is most often left uncapitalized and without italics (cf. Gestalt, Sonderweg). Pronunciation may also be colloquially realized as /kɪʃ/ KISH.

Citations

  1. "Definition of KITSCH". www.merriam-webster.com.
  2. "Dialectic of Enlightenment - Philosophical Fragments" (PDF). Wayback Machine Internet Archive. 2002. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 June 2017. Retrieved 22 October 2021.
  3. Dutton, Denis (2003), "Kitsch", Oxford Art Online, Oxford University Press, doi:10.1093/gao/9781884446054.article.t046768, retrieved 22 October 2021
  4. Scruton, Roger (21 February 2014). "A fine line between art and kitsch". Forbes. Retrieved 16 January 2017.
  5. Calinescu, Matei. Five Faces of Modernity. Kitsch, p. 234.
  6. ^ Menninghaus, Winfried (2009). "On the Vital Significance of 'Kitsch': Walter Benjamin's Politics of 'Bad Taste'". In Andrew Benjamin and Charles Rice (ed.). Walter Benjamin and the Architecture of Modernity. re.press. pp. 39–58. ISBN 9780980544091.
  7. Broch, Hermann (2002). "Evil in the Value System of Art". Geist and Zeitgeist: The Spirit in an Unspiritual Age. Six Essays by Hermann Broch. Counterpoint. pp. 13–40. ISBN 9781582431680.
  8. "Walter Benjamin: Dream Kitsch (trans. Edward Viesel) - -". www.edwardviesel.eu. Retrieved 20 December 2022.
  9. Eaglestone, Robert (25 May 2017). The Broken Voice: Reading Post-Holocaust Literature. Oxford University Press. p. 155. ISBN 978-0191084201.
  10. "A Point of View: The strangely enduring power of kitsch". BBC News. 12 December 2014.
  11. Tomas, Kulka (1996). Kitsch and art. Pennsylvania State Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0271015941. OCLC 837730812.
  12. Higgins, Kathleen Marie; Kulka, Tomas (1998). "Kitsch and Art". The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism. 56 (4). JSTOR: 410. doi:10.2307/432137. ISSN 0021-8529. JSTOR 432137.
  13. Kundera, Milan (1984). The Unbearable Lightness of Being. Harper Perennial. p. 248
  14. ^ Kundera, Milan (1984). The Unbearable Lightness of Being. Harper Perennial. p. 251
  15. Makiya, Kanan (2011). Review: What Is Totalitarian Art? Cultural Kitsch From Stalin to Saddam. Foreign Affairs. 90 (3): 142–148
  16. Kundera, Milan (1984). The Unbearable Lightness of Being. Harper Perennial. p. 253
  17. Olalquiaga, Celeste (1999). The Artificial Kingdom: A Treasury of the Kitsch Experience. Bloomsbury.
  18. Olalquiaga, Celeste (1999). The Artificial Kingdom: A Treasury of the Kitsch Experience. Bloomsbury. pp. 26, 75
  19. Olalquiaga, Celeste (1999). The Artificial Kingdom: A Treasury of the Kitsch Experience. Bloomsbury. p. 292
  20. ^ Olalquiaga, Celeste (1999). The Artificial Kingdom: A Treasury of the Kitsch Experience. Bloomsbury. p. 291
  21. Olalquiaga, Celeste (1999). The Artificial Kingdom: A Treasury of the Kitsch Experience. Bloomsbury. p. 294, 292
  22. Olalquiaga, Celeste (1999). The Artificial Kingdom: A Treasury of the Kitsch Experience. Bloomsbury. p. 298
  23. Audi, Anthony. "Art Spiegelman: If It Walks Like a Fascist…" Literary Hub, 22 March 2017. Retrieved 7 July 2024.
  24. Bourne, Michael. "Beyond Holokitsch: Spiegelman Goes Meta", The Millions, 22 November 2011. Retrieved 7 July 2024.
  25. Corliss, Richard. "Defiance: Beyond Holo-kitsch", Time, 1 January, 2009. Retrieved 7 July 2024.
  26. E.J. Pettinger Archived 7 April 2012 at the Wayback Machine "The Kitsch Campaign" , 29 December 2004.
  27. Dag Solhjell and Odd Nerdrum. On Kitsch, Kagge Publishing, August 2001, ISBN 8248901238.

Bibliography

Further reading

External links

Aesthetics
Areas
Schools
Philosophers
Concepts
Works
Related
Categories: