Revision as of 18:23, 16 April 2021 editPraxidicae (talk | contribs)Edit filter helpers, Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, IP block exemptions, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers169,003 edits →Hatnote← Previous edit |
Revision as of 03:30, 9 January 2025 edit undoJohnadams11 (talk | contribs)303 edits →Opening Paragraph: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → |
(44 intermediate revisions by 27 users not shown) |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{Talk header}} |
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
|
|
|
{{Vital article|level=4|topic=Art|class=GA}} |
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
|action1=PR |
|
|action1=PR |
Line 26: |
Line 26: |
|
|action4oldid=114710440 |
|
|action4oldid=114710440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|action5=GAN |
|
|action5=PR |
|
|action5date=April 10 2020 |
|
|action5date=January 21, 2017 |
|
|action5link=Talk:The Godfather/GA1 |
|
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Godfather/archive3 |
|
|action5result=passed |
|
|action5result=reviewed |
|
|
|
⚫ |
|action5oldid=950054730 |
|
|
|
|action6=GAN |
|
|
|action6date=April 10 2020 |
|
⚫ |
|action6link=Talk:The Godfather/GA1 |
|
|
|action6result=passed |
|
⚫ |
|action6oldid=950054730 |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|otd1date=2010-03-15|otd1oldid=349863230|otd2date=2011-03-15|otd2oldid=419036810|otd3date=2014-03-15|otd3oldid=599536847|otd4date=2017-03-15|otd4oldid=770364934 |
|
|
|otd5date=2022-03-15|otd5oldid=1077030410 |
|
|
|action7 = FAC |
|
|
|action7date = 2024-10-27 |
|
|
|action7link = Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/The Godfather/archive2 |
|
|
|action7result = failed |
|
|
|action7oldid = 1253439950 |
|
⚫ |
|currentstatus=FFAC/GA |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
|currentstatus=GA |
|
|
|topic=media and drama |
|
|topic=media and drama |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
⚫ |
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1= |
|
{{Old peer review|archive=3}} |
|
|
|
{{WikiProject Film|core=yes|American=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Film|core=yes|class=GA|American=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=low|organizedcrime=yes|organizedcrime-imp=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Organized crime|class=GA|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Library of Congress|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States|class=GA|importance=Mid|USFilm=Yes|USFilm-importance=High}} |
|
{{WikiProject New York City|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Library of Congress|class=GA|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject Sicily|importance=Mid}} |
|
{{WikiProject New York City|class=GA|importance=Low}} |
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid|USFilm=Yes|USFilm-importance=Top}} |
⚫ |
{{WikiProject Sicily|class=GA|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
{{annual readership}} |
|
{{annual readership}} |
⚫ |
{{On this day|date1=2010-03-15|oldid1=349863230|date2=2011-03-15|oldid2=419036810|date3=2014-03-15|oldid3=599536847|date4=2017-03-15|oldid4=770364934}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} |
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} |
|
|maxarchivesize = 125K |
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|counter = 5 |
|
|counter = 5 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|algo = old(90d) |
|
|algo = old(180d) |
|
|archive = Talk:The Godfather/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|archive = Talk:The Godfather/Archive %(counter)d |
|
}} |
|
}} |
Line 61: |
Line 73: |
|
}} |
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== "]" listed at ] == |
|
== Moe Greene == |
|
|
|
] |
|
|
|
|
|
The redirect <span class="plainlinks"></span> has been listed at ] to determine whether its use and function meets the ]. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at '''{{slink|Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18#Look how they massacred my boy}}''' until a consensus is reached. <!-- Template:RFDNote --> <span style="background-color: #FFCFBF; font-variant: small-caps">] <sub>(''']''' / ''']''')</sub></span> 05:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC) |
|
Anyone have/find sources as to why ] as ] was not credited in the end credits of the film? ''']<sup><small>]</small></sup>''' 20:36, 24 February 2020 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
⚫ |
{{Talk:The Godfather/GA1}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
== John Cazale == |
|
== Nomination for ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating for FA. ] (]) 20:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
John Cazale is not credited with the role of Fredo Corleone on this page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ping|Betty Logan}} {{ping|Mazewaxie}} {{ping|Vaselineeeeeeee}} {{ping|Wrath X}} |
|
:He is if you read ]. ]|] 01:05, 4 April 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
I think the article is in pretty good shape, would any of you like to bring it to ] status? |
|
|
See ]. ] (]) 22:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Disambig == |
|
== Opening Paragraph == |
|
{{u|Gareth Griffith-Jones}} and {{u|Some Dude From North Carolina}} you're both being disruptive and need to hash it out here. Stop reverting to your preferred version. ] 18:20, 16 April 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? ] (]) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
== Hatnote == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:Its influence and the regard it is held in is covered by the fourth paragraph in the lead. I don't see this as an issue as these elements as a rule are not discussed in the opening paragraph. Indeed, ] (by which GA status is assessed) recommends covering these aspects after the opening paragraph, and states "Summarize awards and achievements using proper context in a ''later'' paragraph" . Obviously there are many valid ways of writing a lead, but the lead in this article follows a common format. ] (]) 02:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
The current hatnote (''This article is about the 1972 film. For the original novel on which the film is based, see ]. For the male godparent in many Christian traditions, see ].''), has an issue in the last part. ] sends a reader to a disambiguation page, and so the hatnote should say just that (... for other uses, see ].) However, even after ] agreed that the small correction was helpful, ] began reverting my edits by calling me "boring" and saying that the current version had been there for a long time. After Praxidicae reverted Gareth for being "silly", Gareth continued to revert everyone's edits. Now, the question is, which hatnote works better? ''']''' ] 18:21, 16 April 2021 (UTC) |
|
|
|
::@] Thank you. The resource you linked is helpful and I can see where the first paragraph is uniform. However, to me at least, it is obvious that the fourth paragraph should be move to second. The film's acclaim is of far more notability than the standard intrigue and deal making that accompanies many film productions. One example of what I'm suggesting is the ] article. Your thoughts? ] (]) 03:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
:Point of clarification, I did not call Gareth silly. I said the note was silly, further, you both edit warred. ] 18:23, 16 April 2021 (UTC) |
|
As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? Johnadams11 (talk) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)