Revision as of 01:26, 9 January 2025 editJohnadams11 (talk | contribs)303 edits →Opening Paragraph: new sectionTag: New topic← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:30, 9 January 2025 edit undoJohnadams11 (talk | contribs)303 edits →Opening Paragraph: ReplyTag: ReplyNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 88: | Line 88: | ||
As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? ] (]) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? ] (]) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | ||
:Its influence and the regard it is held in is covered by the fourth paragraph in the lead. I don't see this as an issue as these elements as a rule are not discussed in the opening paragraph. Indeed, ] (by which GA status is assessed) recommends covering these aspects after the opening paragraph, and states "Summarize awards and achievements using proper context in a ''later'' paragraph" . Obviously there are many valid ways of writing a lead, but the lead in this article follows a common format. ] (]) 02:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
::@] Thank you. The resource you linked is helpful and I can see where the first paragraph is uniform. However, to me at least, it is obvious that the fourth paragraph should be move to second. The film's acclaim is of far more notability than the standard intrigue and deal making that accompanies many film productions. One example of what I'm suggesting is the ] article. Your thoughts? ] (]) 03:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:30, 9 January 2025
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Godfather article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
The Godfather is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination was archived. For older candidates, please check the archive. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Godfather has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This level-4 vital article is rated GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
"Look how they massacred my boy" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect Look how they massacred my boy has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Misplaced Pages:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 18 § Look how they massacred my boy until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:23, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination for FA
Nominating for FA. Caleb Stanford (talk) 20:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC)
@Betty Logan: @Mazewaxie: @Vaselineeeeeeee: @Wrath X: I think the article is in pretty good shape, would any of you like to bring it to FA status? See discussion here. Caleb Stanford (talk) 22:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC)
Opening Paragraph
As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? Johnadams11 (talk) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Its influence and the regard it is held in is covered by the fourth paragraph in the lead. I don't see this as an issue as these elements as a rule are not discussed in the opening paragraph. Indeed, MOS:FILMLEAD (by which GA status is assessed) recommends covering these aspects after the opening paragraph, and states "Summarize awards and achievements using proper context in a later paragraph" . Obviously there are many valid ways of writing a lead, but the lead in this article follows a common format. Betty Logan (talk) 02:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- @Betty Logan Thank you. The resource you linked is helpful and I can see where the first paragraph is uniform. However, to me at least, it is obvious that the fourth paragraph should be move to second. The film's acclaim is of far more notability than the standard intrigue and deal making that accompanies many film productions. One example of what I'm suggesting is the Citizen Kane article. Your thoughts? Johnadams11 (talk) 03:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC)
- Misplaced Pages good articles
- Media and drama good articles
- Old requests for peer review
- Former good article nominees
- GA-Class level-4 vital articles
- Misplaced Pages level-4 vital articles in Arts
- GA-Class vital articles in Arts
- GA-Class film articles
- GA-Class core film articles
- WikiProject Film core articles
- GA-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- Core film articles supported by the American cinema task force
- WikiProject Film articles
- GA-Class Crime-related articles
- Low-importance Crime-related articles
- GA-Class Organized crime articles
- Low-importance Organized crime articles
- Organized crime task force articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles
- GA-Class Library of Congress articles
- Low-importance Library of Congress articles
- WikiProject Library of Congress articles
- GA-Class New York City articles
- Low-importance New York City articles
- WikiProject New York City articles
- GA-Class Sicily articles
- Mid-importance Sicily articles
- WikiProject Sicily articles
- GA-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- GA-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- Top-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles