| Revision as of 03:13, 8 July 2024 editAbecedare (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators33,231 edits →Regarding long ongoing vandalism in Maratha Confederacy article: r← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 10:45, 9 January 2025 edit undoMr.Hanes (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,224 editsNo edit summaryTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit Advanced mobile edit | ||
| (98 intermediate revisions by 29 users not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| == SPI request == | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| Hi Abecedare, I know you're inactive on Misplaced Pages for the time being, but I was wondering if you could take a quick look at this report . You know HaughtonBrit and the tricks he employs, how he acts like, and his campaign against me-you've dealt with him, your input would be immensely appreciated here. ] (]) 21:49, 6 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| :{{You got mail}} ] (]) 19:30, 7 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ::{{reply|Suthasianhistorian8}} I looked over the two recent SPI reports and the behavioral evidence is indeed suspicious. I have to take a look to see if CU findings can support this suspicion. Will follow up once they (or, other admins/CUs) have weighted in. Cheers. ] (]) 18:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks Abecedare for looking into it. It doesn't look like CUs are going to look at RR at the moment but in due time I'll file a SPI (although this message may finally deter RR from interacting with me any further so a SPI may be redundant). Your input will tremendously help if/when I file it. I also hope I didn't bother you too much while you were inactive. ] (]) 01:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::{{reply|Suthasianhistorian8}} I would suggest holding off on filing another SPI report at least until the current one is resolved and not to do so unless there is ''fresh'' evidence that supports sockpupptry specifically. If the evidence is regarding disruption etc, it may be better handled at ANI/AE since that can be addressed regardless of whether an account is new or an LTA. ] (]) 15:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::" I would suggest holding off on filing another SPI report at least until the current one is resolved" | |||
| :::::Yeah, I'll definitely wait until the Historian2325 case is resolved before filing anything new. | |||
| :::::"and not to do so unless there is fresh evidence that supports sockpupptry specifically" | |||
| :::::I'm a bit confused about this; for example, would the votes on the Battle of Michni and Battle of Haidru AFDs be considered evidence of sockpuppetry since they align with HB's POV and one of his former SPAs? ] (]) 15:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::Hi Abecedare, I saw your comment on RegentPark's t/p - it was unclear whether you're going off the email/SPI report back in March/April or if you checked the recent SPI case, which is many times better than the former. If you haven't, I really, really think the RR/Festivalfalcon873 reports will convince you. Apologies if you have looked at the current version. | |||
| ::::::The evidence is far stronger than the , who didn't even have a CU check run on him, but was rightfully blocked as a DUCK. RangersRus took it multiple steps further than Elifanta, and only began his AFD mass votes as an obvious reaction to me, having ~1000 edits, 5 months, and zero participation in AFDs before my first nom of 2024, made his first vote 3 hours after my nom, his first 3 AFD votes were clearly DUCK like with one having 4 votes made by HB's IPs, sabotaged multiple of my AFDs, was created one hour after was blocked with both accounts making the same edits to movie articles etc etc. In conjunction with the FestivalFalcon case, there's undeniable proof of sock accounts vote stacking. | |||
| ::::::I'm imploring you to not allow his sock puppetry give him an unfair advantage over legitimate users. ] (]) 23:28, 30 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::{{reply|Southasianhistorian8}} I had taken a look at the Apr 6 report last month but haven't read through the ] one. Will go through the Festivalfalcon873 part of the latter later today and see if there is enough behavioral evidence to reach a definitive conclusion. ] (]) 18:58, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::Okay, thank you! ] (]) 18:59, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::{{reply|Southasianhistorian8}} I just realized that I have ] over content issues and so cannot weigh in as an admin. That said, taking a look at ] (esp. including the ]) shows a consistent pattern of poor sourcing/content and POV-pushing despite feedback from several editors. Festivalfalcon873 hasn't edited in a couple of weeks but if they return and continue in the same vein, it would be worthwhile to request at least a TBAN from Indian & Afghan history or ]. ] (]) 19:27, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::Yeah, but there is strong behavioural evidence for Festivalfalcon, which even Drmies implied to, stating the smoking guns in the report were reason for him to check. I'm not too familiar with this, but given that you're one of the only admins who knows HB best, perhaps ] might apply when dealing with his sock accounts, especially since they are creating an enormous amount of disruption. I also added some new evidence for RangersRus in the May 10 report and made the SPI far more articulate than before. ] (]) 19:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::Southasianhistorian8, as I commented recently at RP's talkpage I don't think trying to prove sockpuppetry for these accounts is the most productive direction. Just evaluating Festivalfalcon873's contributions ''on their own'' would have been IMO sufficient to sanction them under ]. Note though that it is essential for the editor to be ] designation for them to be sanctionable under ]. I have just done so for Festivalfalcon873 and would highly recommend doing so for any account editing in this particular "battles" niche from hereon. Cheers. ] (]) 19:56, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::But what am I supposed to do in AFDs where 2-3 sock accounts vote? Or one of my AFDs in which RR tries to undermine, I don't think I can take those votes ''alone'' to ANI or AE...] (]) 20:11, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::: Just !vote on the merit since AFD is not a vote counting exercise, ie, either list a few ] compliant sources that discuss the battle in significant detail if you think the article should be retained or ask others !voting keep to list the ]. I realize that this will not always work (''c'est la vie'') but IMO it will work well in surprisingly many cases since many of these battle articles are based on on-wiki OR, ie, editors read a single sentence in a (often, dated/hagiographical) source that there was some skirmish at, say, the foothills of Alabanada in year 1523 and create a newly designated "Battle of Alabanda (1523)" complete with Infobox with flags, combatants, commanders, casualties and declaring their favored side the victor. You , of course, are well aware of this but in case any TPS'ers believe that I am exaggerating see the ]. Unfortunately, there are dozens (hundreds?) of dubious articles on wikipedia, esp. relating to Mughal, Maratha, Sikh and Afghan "battles", that follow this formula. | |||
| ::::::::::::: To be clear, I am not suggesting that you ignore HB sockpuppetry from hereon. Only that there are several tools and processes on wikipedia to handle disruption and in some cases, instead of just relying on admin/CU's (limited) ability to confirm sockpuppetry, just ask admins at ANI/ARE to address the disruptive behavior head-on. Cheers. ] (]) 20:44, 31 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::::Abecedare, one of the sockpuppets in the SPI, Alvin1783, has been following me around in 4 separate cases now: Maratha-Patiala clashes, Battle of Chenab, Guru Tegh Bahadur (within a few hours-days of my edits) and now on the Battle of Wan. In addition to the similarity in names with Festivalfalcon873 and the latter emailing the AFD closer on a page that Alvin1783 created, this is what HB keeps on doing time and time again; you were there for it during the summer last year. If this trend continues, what am I to do? His hounding is not something I can tolerate. ] (]) 21:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::::::How is it that he only he comes back after his "hiatus" and the very first things he does is to try to undermine articles that I PRODed? He's obviously taking advantage of the laxity surrounding his SPIs to continue his harassment campaigns? ] (]) 21:42, 7 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::::::::::::Extremely, extremely, extremely thankful that you blocked that account. ] (]) 21:56, 7 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::::::::See my note the SPI with the TLDR being that Alvin1783 is clearly Ganda Singh and likely HB. Cheers. ] (]) 22:11, 7 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::::::::Abecedare, I'm incredibly grateful to you, one last thing; this might be of interest: . Festivalfalcon873 comes back within minutes after Alvin1783's block to update the article, then backtracks when he likely realized that he messed up. It undeniably proves they are both socks. Bizarre stuff. ] (]) 22:14, 7 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::::::::: Blocked. | |||
| :::::::::::::::::: As with the Koli sockmaster, if there a set of articles in this area that would benefit from protection, feel free to list them here. Cheers. ] (]) 22:36, 7 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::::::::::::::::::Thanks again Abecedare. Sorry, who's Koli? ] (]) 22:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{od}} I was alluding to another ] who is active in the Koli-caste area. One approach to dealing with them besides the usual whack-a-mole is to EC protect the articles most commonly targeted by the socks. For example, search for my Aug 4, 2023 comment ]. A similar approach can be tried wrt to the HB socks (under ] instead of ]). Cheers. ] (]) 22:46, 7 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :Understood. I will definitely employ page protection in the future in case HB continues his hounding, and I understand that it's easier than filing a SPI. Thank you once again. ] (]) 22:49, 7 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| :: To be clear: page protection is not an alternative to SPI. While the latter is an effort to identify and block socks, the former is an effort to prevent disruption at an article by ''future'' sock accounts. Page protection makes it less fruitful for sockmasters like HB to divide their editing among dozens of essentially throwaway accounts; the accounts instead have to build up enough of an editing history, which both makes it easier to identify behavioral patterns and is a greater loss of effort for the sockmaster if the account is blocked. But admins will apply page-protection only to articles which already have a history of being targeted by previously identified sockaccounts and not merely because an editor believes that some currently unblocked account is a sock. Cheers. ] (]) 23:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
| == |
== Season's Greetings == | ||
| {| style="border:2px ; background-color: #FFF7E6;" | |||
| If you are intending to archive the ADL discussion there's an empty archive that could be used. The discussion was previously archived but then moved back to the notivceboard, leaving ] completely empty. -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 21:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="right" | ] | |||
| :Thanks but by "archiving" I just meant so that there is a greater disincentive to add further comments to the already voluminous discussion. I don't want to the move the ADL RFC off the main ] page yet, even though it is making the board hard to view and edit, because doing so prematurely is likely to only lead to further confusion and meta-discussions. Cheers. ] (]) 21:54, 20 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| ::Sorry misunderstood what you said, thanks anyway. -- <small>LCU</small> ''']''' <small>''«]» °]°''</small> 21:56, 20 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 2; vertical-align: left; height: 1.1em;" | '''Season's Greetings''' | |||
| :::Not your fault. I myself was searching for the correct word to describe my intended action because both archiving and closing could be misinterpreted. Hence wrote it up as "archiving" with the scare quotes. :) ] (]) 22:00, 20 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | <blockquote>When he took up his hat to go, he gave one long look round the library. Then he turned ... (and Saxon took advantage of this to wag his way in and join the party), and said, "It's a rare privilege, the free entry of a book chamber like this. I'm hoping ... that you are not insensible of it." </blockquote> | |||
| (Text on page 17 illustrated in the ] in ]'s ''Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers'', illustrated by ], London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.) | |||
| == Request for intervention == | |||
| ]] 04:47, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hi Abecedare, hope you are fine. I would like to request you to have a look at this SPA (if not a caste warrior), {{noping|RobertJudeson}} trying to push their POV with no intention of achieving consensus! The user is also engaged in edit warring in contentious caste articles in spite of being aware of the discretionary sanctions and even after warnings. Please check the revision history of the article on ] and the user talk page! Moreover, it doesn't seem that they are a new user, rather they seem to be a sock from the sockfarm of ]. Before I could file an SPI, another editor has already done so; you may check ]! Thanks & Regards. ] (]) 18:08, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| == Happy Holidays! == | |||
| :For now, I have full protected ] and left ]. Should at least give everyone some breathing room to calmly discuss the content issues ''and'' deal with the suspected sockpuppetry (I may take a look at that later but no promises). Let me know if the edit-warring continues or spreads to other articles. Cheers. ] (]) 18:38, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks a lot. Regards. ] (]) 18:44, 24 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{reply|Ekdalian}} Good call on the sockmaster! Btw in reverting the sock's edits at I noticed that they had cited and they have misrepresented sources at other places (eg, in ; I had seen other examples but lost track of exactly where). Pinging {{ping|Fylindfotberserk}} who I saw that the sock mentioned at ANI. Cheers. ] (]) 15:12, 29 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Thanks, Abecedare. You have done everything to protect these articles and revert to the last clean versions. I would like to thank you once again for being here; you truly represent an ideal admin! Regards. ] (]) 17:05, 29 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border: 3px solid #01902a; background-color:#fff; text-align:left; padding:2px;"><div style="border: 2px solid red; background-color:#fff; text-align:left; padding:6px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| == Undiscussed page moves and hijacking attempts by TSJ/Bensebgli/Anujror sockfarms == | |||
| I saw that you blocked the TSJ's range and protected the redirects. I'm wondering if it's possible to undo the damage they've done by moving these long standing redirects by renaming back to their original name or merging their histories or deleting them. I tried but I got a error that states "page of that name already exists". These are the redirects that I'm talking about. | |||
| *] was moved to ] by {{noping|Varoon Punia}} and then moved to ] by {{noping|Ravish Dhankar}} (TSJ sock). | |||
| *] was moved to ] by {{noping|Vinuraj Solanki}} and was subsequently hijacked as a ] related article by {{noping|Santosh Semwal Uttarkashi}}. (Both TSJ socks). | |||
| *] was moved to ] by Vinuraj Solanki.. | |||
| *] was moved to ] by Vinuraj Solanki. | |||
| *] moved to ] by Vinuraj Solanki. | |||
| *] to ] by {{noping|Salimbhatt234}} . | |||
| *] was moved to ] by {{noping|Akshay Rotela}}. . | |||
| *] was moved to ] by Salimbhatt234 . | |||
| *] was an accepted ] submission and served as a redirect to ] ,it was later moved to ] and then to ] by Akshay Rotela , and was subsequently hijacked by a sock from the Bensebgli group. . | |||
| *] was moved to ] by {{noping|Chotu singhaniya}}. | |||
| *] was moved to ] by Chotu singhaniya . | |||
| *](a redirect to ]) was moved to ] and then to ] by {{noping|Dhirendra Sengar}}. | |||
| *] was moved to ] and then to ] by {{noping|Kaljibhai Mer}}.. | |||
| These are the ones that I've encountered, I'm certain there are many more such redirects . <span style="font-family:'forte'">] <b>(])</b></span> 06:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ] (]) is wishing you a ] ]! This greeting (and season) promotes ] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! | |||
| :Will take a look in the next 24h. Feel free to add to the list in the meantime. Cheers ] (]) 07:11, 26 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::{{reply|Ratnahastin}} Done except for ] / ] because in that case I couldn't figure out where the article actually belongs and what its content (if anything) should be; several sockfarms seem to be involved; and, a few good-faith editors have weighed in (likely w/o being aware of the socking issues)making it ineligible for G5. I have protected the two pages so that non-sock knowledgeable editors can fix the content as they see fit. | |||
| ::Let me know if I missed something or erred somewhere in handling the above list. Cheers. ] (]) 01:01, 27 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Thanks, can you have a look at these redirect moves too? | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] <span style="font-family:'forte'">] <b>(])</b></span> 06:05, 27 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::These are from ]/]/] sock group. | |||
| ::*] > ]> | |||
| ::*] > ] > ]. | |||
| ::*] > ] . | |||
| ::*] > ] > ] . | |||
| ::*] > ]. | |||
| ::*] > ] > ]. | |||
| ::*] >]. | |||
| ::*] > ] . | |||
| ::*] > ]. | |||
| ::*] > ] . | |||
| ::*] > ] . | |||
| ::*] > ] . | |||
| ::*] > ] . | |||
| ::*] > ] . | |||
| ::*] > ] . | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] (See also who moved many Japanese clan pages) | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| ::*] > ] | |||
| <span style="font-family:'forte'">] <b>(])</b></span> 06:51, 27 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Thanks. Will take a look as and when I am procrastinating from other tasks. :) ] (]) 17:13, 27 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::: I've cleaned up most of the first group of pages where a redirect was hijacked by an unrelated subject. I wonder if some ] entries would be useful here, i.e <code><nowiki>.*koli.* <moveonly></nowiki></code> would block any attempts to move a page to a title containing the word "koli" (case insensitive) by anyone who is not in the ], ] or ] groups. ] ] 21:23, 5 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::''Much'' appreciated {{u|Pppery}}! | |||
| :::::: I have ] our a bit but thanks for setting up the title blacklist and if there is anything more that can be done, feel free to get in touch by email. Cheers. ] (]) 22:09, 5 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ''Spread the cheer by adding {{tls|Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.'' | |||
| == Nsibidi-related editing == | |||
| </div></div> ] (]) 08:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy Holidays == | |||
| Hey Abecedare, I want to bring the articles ] and ] back into a more neutral and fact-based shape, since CHI-Research has been spreading their POV there as well. Can you keep an eye on that and maybe lend a helping hand, if needed? Thanks, ] (]) 11:18, 30 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{reply|Gawaon}} I don't plan to edit those, or even the ] article, myself but I have watchlisted ] and ] to keep an eye and provide talkpage input from a disinterested viewpoint, if needed. In case there is disruption on the pages that I miss, feel free to ping me or drop a note here. Happy editing! ] (]) 14:56, 30 June 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:red; background-color:#fff; border-width:2px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| == Publish this page, please. == | |||
| https://en.m.wikipedia.org/Draft:V._Balsara | |||
| ] (]) is wishing you ]! This greeting (and season) promotes ] and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user ], whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year! <br /> | |||
| Used genuine references from ], ], ], ], and ] | |||
| ] (]) 01:57, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :{{reply|Wikifulness}} I have submitted your draft for review so that an AFC regular can take a look, provide you feedback, and move it mainspace when ready. You can continue to make improvements to the draft in the meantime. For example, on a spot check not all the facts in each para seem to match up with the specific reference cited at the the the para's end. You should take another look and make sure that everything is verifiable and properly cited. Cheers. ] (]) 02:21, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| {{Re|Abecedare}} Thanks for your kind attention. From Wikifulness <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 03:16, July 7, 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ''Spread the cheer by adding {{tls|Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.'' | |||
| == Biased user == | |||
| </div>] (]) 14:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Happy New Year, Abecedare! == | |||
| Ratnahastin has an anti-BJP and pro-INC bias, and engage in edit war. Their edits are a mix of content removal (sourced), POV pushing, censoring, and misrepresentation of sources. Refer the edit history and talk page of ] in early April this year, also check the edit warring in ] from 31 March where the user tag-teamed with Rzvas for content removal without even providing a valid explanation. The problem in those articles still prevails.--] (]) 16:01, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em; height:auto; min-height:173px; border-radius:1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks"> | |||
| :IP, at a quick glance the edits at the two articles you mentioned appear to be routine content disputes that can and should be settled through talkpage discussion or ]; I cannot determine if you have tried that approach while editing through another IP or account. If there is anything particular you are concerned about, you'll need to be more specific (ie, provide ] etc), and ] or ] may be a better venue to ensure a broader and more timely response. Pinging {{u|The Doom Patrol }} who was involved in both those disputes in case they wish to follow up on this complaint at those boards. Cheers. ] (]) 17:03, 7 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ]] | |||
| {{Paragraph break}} | |||
| == Regarding long ongoing vandalism in Maratha Confederacy article == | |||
| {{Center|{{resize|179%|''''']!'''''}}}} | |||
| '''Abecedare''',<br />Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable ], and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. | |||
| Hi, | |||
| <br />] (]) 01:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)<br /><br /> | |||
| </div> | |||
| A user ] is repeatedly removing sourced content (WP:RS) from ] article without any valid reason. He is telling any editor to have a discussion or consensus if they wanna add any information in the article. Moreover he is not accepting the statement of reliable sources and when I am asking him to provide any sources for support of his statement or views he isn't (see this ). The article prior to my most recent edits has numerous failed sources and wrong information in the lead, when i am correcting it, he is reverting my edits, removing wrong information and changing it to correct information doesn't require consensus or discussion. I have even quoted from the sources so that other editors could easily verify it. Kindly see to it. | |||
| ''{{resize|88%|Send New Year cheer by adding {{tls|Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.}}'' | |||
| {{clear}}<!-- From template:Happy New Year fireworks --> ] (]) 01:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| ==Proposal== | |||
| Hey Abe, please have a look here . ''']''' ] ''']''' 10:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
| :{{reply|Mohammad Umar Ali|PadFoot2008 }} I don't know offhand which of your preferred is superior or has consensus but I can second the advice {{u| Flemmish Nietzsche}} has offered several times on the page (eg and ) that edit-warring and arguing about what the article lede should state ''while'' the discussions are ongoing (or on hiatus) is unproductive. Until clear consensus is established, any "correction" you may make to the article is going to be unstable. So I would suggest that: | |||
| :# Get back to the article talkpage, and use ] if needed | |||
| :# Break up the problem into addressable chunks because it is unlikely that you will be able to settle all the differences seen in at one go. | |||
| :# Also consider whether all that detail belongs in the article lede (again, as Flemmish Nietzsche ) | |||
| :# Stop reverting each other in the meantime! | |||
| :Note that if the current conduct continues, page protection or page blocks are likely. Hopefully, that won't be necessary though. Cheers. ] (]) 02:41, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::That ] was just about one line and Flemmish didn't remove it after I added it but the rest of what I added see this is supported by reliable sources. While the previous version prior to my edit has wrong information, it's that sources say one this but lead contains entirely different information. I already had a discussion with him but he is providing no sources random statements of any user can't be included in the argument. The main problem is that he isn't accepting information stated by reliable sources nor he is giving any reliable sources for support of his claim. So please help me out. ] (]) 02:56, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Also I wanted to point out one more thing, Padfoot often ignores the discussion once he revert my edits you could see this from the many discussions me and Padfoot had on article's talk page. Now as he has restored the previous version he will likely not answer or delay the discussion. ] (]) 03:11, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::{{reply|Mohammad Umar Ali}} reading the discussions on the talkage, it is difficult for an outside observer to even determine what proposed addition or deletion is being argued over in which section. That is why I suggested the above steps. That way, even if you/PadFoot2008 cannot see eye to eye, you can point to the specific section where the particular edit was discussed and ''other'' discussants weighed in on one side. ] (]) 03:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 10:45, 9 January 2025
Please sign your messages by appending ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 21 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Season's Greetings
|
Season's Greetings | |
(Text on page 17 illustrated in the frontispiece in Juliana Horatia Ewing's Mary's Meadow and Other Tales of Fields and Flowers, illustrated by Mary Wheelhouse, London: G. Bell and Sons, 1915.) |
Happy Holidays!
.jpg)
Ekdalian (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas5}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Ekdalian (talk) 08:39, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
LukeEmily (talk) is wishing you Happy Holidays! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user Happy Holidays, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!
Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Happy holidays}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
LukeEmily (talk) 14:43, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy New Year, Abecedare!
Abecedare,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Misplaced Pages.
Dympies (talk) 01:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.
Dympies (talk) 01:05, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Proposal
Hey Abe, please have a look here . Mr.Hanes 
Talk 10:45, 9 January 2025 (UTC)