Revision as of 12:02, 31 August 2005 editAllen3 (talk | contribs)60,397 edits {{oldpeerreview}}← Previous edit |
Revision as of 15:04, 9 January 2025 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,302,385 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:The Godfather/Archive 5) (botNext edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
{{oldpeerreview}} |
|
{{Talkheader}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{ArticleHistory |
|
==Forked Article== |
|
|
|
|action1=PR |
|
|
|action1date=16 August 2005 |
|
|
|action1link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Godfather/archive1 |
|
|
|action1result=reviewed |
|
|
|action1oldid=21143374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action2=FAC |
|
The content of this article was ''forked'' from another article, ]. Please see that article's page history for contributor information for parts of this article. |
|
|
|
|action2date=September 3 2005 |
|
|
|action2link=Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/The Godfather/archive1 |
|
|
|action2result=failed |
|
|
|action2oldid=22472734 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action3=GAN |
|
==Cast List== |
|
|
|
|action3date=June 23 2006 |
|
|
|action3link=Talk:The Godfather/Archive 1#Failed GA |
|
|
|action3result=failed |
|
|
|action3oldid=60763282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action4=PR |
|
I'm thinking that the '''See Also''' section ought to be used for the more notable among the cast, e.g. ], ] and of course ]. Perhaps a selective cast list could go under the '''Casting''' section, to avoid clogging up the bottom of the article? ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 10:55, 17 August 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action4date=March 13 2007 |
|
*Certainly sounds reasonable. Perhaps a seperate cast section should be added instead of listed under See Also ? ] 20:53, 18 August 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action4link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Godfather/archive2 |
|
**I'll get onto this later today. ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 02:30, 22 August 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action4result=reviewed |
|
***Done. ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 12:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|action4oldid=114710440 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action5=PR |
|
==References== |
|
|
|
|action5date=January 21, 2017 |
|
|
|action5link=Misplaced Pages:Peer review/The Godfather/archive3 |
|
|
|action5result=reviewed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|action6=GAN |
|
I'm now in the awkward position of trying to fill up the ''References'' section for this article. As I didn't write most of the content (forked from another article), this is going to be difficult. All help is therefore welcome. A brief read-through suggests references for the following claims will be needed, at the very least: |
|
|
|
|action6date=April 10 2020 |
|
|
|action6link=Talk:The Godfather/GA1 |
|
|
|action6result=passed |
|
|
|action6oldid=950054730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|otd1date=2010-03-15|otd1oldid=349863230|otd2date=2011-03-15|otd2oldid=419036810|otd3date=2014-03-15|otd3oldid=599536847|otd4date=2017-03-15|otd4oldid=770364934 |
|
*''Pacino was only granted the role after Coppola threatened to quit the production.'' |
|
|
|
|otd5date=2022-03-15|otd5oldid=1077030410 |
|
*''It was voted greatest film of all time by Entertainment Weekly, and #3 of all time by the American Film Institute. It is consistently, and currently, ranked #1 on IMDB's Top 250.'' |
|
|
|
|action7 = FAC |
|
*''Coppola stated that the horse's head was delivered to him from a dog food company; a horse had not been killed especially for the movie.'' |
|
|
|
|action7date = 2024-10-27 |
|
*''Mafia families began a "real life" tradition of paying respect to the family don by kissing his ring, in imitation of the opening scene of The Godfather.'' |
|
|
|
|action7link = Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/The Godfather/archive2 |
|
|
|action7result = failed |
|
|
|action7oldid = 1253439950 |
|
|
|currentstatus=FFAC/GA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|topic=media and drama |
|
All pointers welcome. ] <sup>'']'' | '']''</sup> 12:36, 22 August 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1= |
|
|
{{WikiProject Film|core=yes|American=yes}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography|importance=low|organizedcrime=yes|organizedcrime-imp=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Library of Congress|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject New York City|importance=Low}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject Sicily|importance=Mid}} |
|
|
{{WikiProject United States|importance=Mid|USFilm=Yes|USFilm-importance=Top}} |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{annual readership}} |
|
|
{{User:MiszaBot/config |
|
|
|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav|noredlinks=y}} |
|
|
|maxarchivesize = 150K |
|
|
|counter = 5 |
|
|
|minthreadsleft = 2 |
|
|
|minthreadstoarchive = 1 |
|
|
|algo = old(180d) |
|
|
|archive = Talk:The Godfather/Archive %(counter)d |
|
|
}} |
|
|
{{User:HBC Archive Indexerbot/OptIn |
|
|
|target=Talk:The Godfather/Archive index |
|
|
|mask=Talk:The Godfather/Archive <#> |
|
|
|leading_zeros=0 |
|
|
|indexhere=yes |
|
|
}} |
|
|
|
|
|
== Redirection == |
|
== Nomination for ] == |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nominating for FA. ] (]) 20:01, 26 October 2024 (UTC) |
|
It is ridiculous for ] to redirect here. Either ] should be a disambiguation page, or this page should be at ]. I think either is defensible, but it is not defensible to have the main title redirecting to a disambiguated title. What on earth is the point of the disambiguated title in this case? ] ] 21:33, 24 August 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:There, happy? - ] ] 22:01, August 24, 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
{{ping|Betty Logan}} {{ping|Mazewaxie}} {{ping|Vaselineeeeeeee}} {{ping|Wrath X}} |
|
::Quite. ] ] 06:14, 25 August 2005 (UTC) |
|
|
|
I think the article is in pretty good shape, would any of you like to bring it to ] status? |
|
|
See ]. ] (]) 22:54, 16 November 2024 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Opening Paragraph == |
|
|
|
|
|
As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? ] (]) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Its influence and the regard it is held in is covered by the fourth paragraph in the lead. I don't see this as an issue as these elements as a rule are not discussed in the opening paragraph. Indeed, ] (by which GA status is assessed) recommends covering these aspects after the opening paragraph, and states "Summarize awards and achievements using proper context in a ''later'' paragraph" . Obviously there are many valid ways of writing a lead, but the lead in this article follows a common format. ] (]) 02:00, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
|
|
::@] Thank you. The resource you linked is helpful and I can see where the first paragraph is uniform. However, to me at least, it is obvious that the fourth paragraph should be move to second. The film's acclaim is of far more notability than the standard intrigue and deal making that accompanies many film productions. One example of what I'm suggesting is the ] article. Your thoughts? ] (]) 03:30, 9 January 2025 (UTC) |
As noted in the article, this film is one of the greatest and most influential films of all time. Yet, the article's entire first paragraph makes absolutely no note of this. Has this issue been discussed before? Johnadams11 (talk) 01:26, 9 January 2025 (UTC)